WASHINGTON – Moving quickly, House Republicans are taking another whack at federal spending on the day after a State of the Union address in which President Barack Obama pronounced the country “poised for progress” and beckoned lawmakers of both parties to make job creation their common goal. “The challenges we face are bigger than party, and bigger than politics,” the president said in a nationally televised speech at the…
Continue reading …None of the broadcast news programs from Monday evening and Tuesday morning covered the 2011 “March for Life” in Washington, DC, a pro-life rally that reportedly drew at least tens of thousands of attendees. Neither NBC, ABC, nor CBS gave any coverage Monday to the march on their respective evening news programs; none of the networks covered the story Tuesday morning. The New York Times did not cover the story, as the MRC's blog “Times Watch” documented. The Washington Post, however, did provide a fair account of the rally in its Metro section. Although the Post did report “thousands” attended the march, good faith estimates are easily in the tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands. The Post reported that attendees were “encouraged by recent federal and state GOP wins and hopeful about proposed measures that would further tighten bans on federal funding for abortions.”
Continue reading …I don’t think anyone’s surprised about this . I just wonder if anything will happen as a result — even if it’s just that Karl Rove is no longer invited onto news shows as some shining example of political genius. It’s not difficult to do most things if you’re willing to ignore the rules: WASHINGTON — The Bush White House, particularly before the 2006 midterm elections, r outinely violated a federal law that prohibits use of federal tax dollars to pay for political activities by creating a “political boiler room” that coordinated Republican campaign activities nationwide , a report issued Monday by an independent federal agency concludes. The report by the Office of Special Counsel finds that the Bush administration’s Office of Political Affairs — overseen by Karl Rove — served almost as an extension of the Republican National Committee , developing a “target list” of Congressional races, organizing dozens of briefings for political appointees to press them to work for party candidates, and sending cabinet officials out to help these campaigns. The report, based on about 100,000 pages of documents and interviews with 80 Bush administration officials in an investigation of more than three years, documented how these political activities accelerated before the 2006 midterm elections. This included helping coordinate fund-raising by Republican candidates and pressing Bush administration political appointees to help with Republican voter-turnout pitches, particularly in the 72 hours leading up to the election when Democrats took control of the House and Senate for the first time in a dozen years. The Office of Special Counsel, a relatively obscure federal agency, is charged with enforcing the Hatch Act, a 1939 law that prohibits federal employees from engaging in partisan political activity. Certain members of the White House political staff — including the top aides at the Office of Political Affairs — are exempt, as are the president, vice president and members of the cabinet. But the law still prohibits the use of federal money, even by these officials, to support political causes.
Continue reading …A former Tory peer was today found guilty of fiddling his expenses to claim more than £11,000 from the public purse. Lord Taylor of Warwick falsely filed for travel and overnight subsistence, a jury at Southwark Crown Court decided by a majority of 11 to one. The 58-year-old told the House of Lords members’ expenses office that his main residence was in Oxford, when he lived in west London. Taylor, whose first name is John, was the first parliamentarian to be tried and found guilty by a jury over the expenses scandal. The jury of seven men and five women took just over five hours to reach their majority verdict that Taylor, of Lynwood Road, Ealing, made £11,277.80-worth of claims on various…
Continue reading …All images: Finisterre As we’ve said before, Finisterre is an outdoor apparel company we’ve a great deal of respect for. They go from strength to strength. Aside from winning one award after the other, and garnering positive magazine gear reviews, they keep putting out the product they want to wear, sourced and manufactured so they can sleep easy at night. Clean, lean, functional, (and funky) eco and ethically minded clothing for those who spend their days outside, whatever the weather. This northern winter they’ve added, in addition to colour and style revisions to signature products, a number of new products, with back-st… Read the full story on TreeHugger
Continue reading …All images: Finisterre As we’ve said before, Finisterre is an outdoor apparel company we’ve a great deal of respect for. They go from strength to strength. Aside from winning one award after the other, and garnering positive magazine gear reviews, they keep putting out the product they want to wear, sourced and manufactured so they can sleep easy at night. Clean, lean, functional, (and funky) eco and ethically minded clothing for those who spend their days outside, whatever the weather. This northern winter they’ve added, in addition to colour and style revisions to signature products, a number of new products, with back-st… Read the full story on TreeHugger
Continue reading …What's with the New York Times and its inability to practice what it preaches when it comes to avoiding gun-filled images and rhetoric?
Continue reading …Lawmakers from both sides of the aisle are in favor of changing the rules to allow cash-strapped states to seek bankruptcy protection but House Majority Leader Eric Cantor has dismissed the idea. Cantor says states already have the power to balance their books through cutting spending, raising taxes, or renegotiating…
Continue reading …The dominant front-page story in Monday's Washington Post is headlined “Hearings on Muslims trigger panic: Some fear that a coming House inquiry into alleged hidden radicalism will inflame prejudice.” The headline on the inside page is 'Some compare hearings to McCarthyism.” William Wan's story added in the third paragraph, smack dab on the front page: “Angry op-eds have compared the congressional inquiry to McCarthyism and the World War II persecution of Japanese Americans .” Can anyone recall the Post leading a “panic” against a hearing a Democrat had yet to begin? The target of all this “panic” is Rep. Peter King, a moderate Republican from Long Island. Nowhere in this story were mentions of Fort Hood or the Christmas Day bomber, which might define “hidden radicalism.” Wan focused his story on a Long Island mosque where King used to appear, and how those local Muslims feel betrayed by King after 9/11.
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Following the mass shooting in Tucson, Arizona that left six dead and Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (R-AZ) in the hospital, there have been calls for politicians and pundits to back off violent rhetoric. But tea party favorite Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) isn’t about to let the tragedy change his tone. Prior to the shooting, Republicans in the House introduced “The Repealing the Job-Killing Health-Care Law Act.” Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) used the phrase “job-killing” eight times in one briefing on Jan. 4. Most Republicans dialed back that rhetoric in the wake of the shooting. “Whether it’s job-killing, job-destroying, job-crushing, job-ending, job-eliminating, job-preventing, job-limiting, job-hurting, job-excising, job-removing, job-exterminating, or job-doingawaywith – the point is clear,” Cantor later said . In an interview broadcast on ABC Sunday, Lee refused to follow Cantor’s lead. “The shooter wins if we, who’ve been elected, change what we do just because of what he did,” Lee told ABC. And Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) may agree. Speaking to Fox News’ Chris Wallace Sunday about whether Republicans would force a shut down of the government if Democrats didn’t agree to deep spending cuts, McConnell used some violent imagery of his own. “Nobody is going to put a gun to anybody’s head here,” he said.
Continue reading …