Home » Posts tagged with » house (Page 192)

Infowars

No Comment
Infowars

NWO 3.wmv 9/11 – What Happened to Building No. 7 Joel Skousen: The Final Economic Countdown 3/3 mauritius, infowars , syracuse basketball, prison planet, … – World … mauritius infowars syracuse basketball prison planet ncaa basketball benlysta peter king cbs sports red wine atf playlist corned beef and cabbage kelly. Charlie Sheen On InfoWars : Is Alex Jones Selling Out? – Examiner … It’s not a joke. Charlie Sheen was really a guest on Alex Jones’ InfoWars radio show yesterday. But why. Is infowars and Alex Jones a reliable source of information in … Infowars and Alex Jones is a reliable source of *entertainment*. No Mila but That 70s show was funny. Share. Related posts: Another question about Alex Jones: what do you think – News :- Gossip. La douce vie: National Enquirer and The … Saudi unrest escalates, police fire on protesters : Infowars Ireland Opposition calls for bigger protest Friday; oil prices rebound on news msnbc.msn.com CAIRO — Saudi police opened fire Thursday to. Infowars calls Rolling Stone feature on Alex Jones | Says Haalloo! The Rolling Stone feature called Alex Jones “the most paranoid man in America” and “a multiplatform prophet of paranoia who sees diabolical plots in every turn of the news cycle.” Infowars_co_uk says: Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth – 2011 Midwest Tour: AE911Truth Tour | Richard Gage, AIA will embark on a … http://bit.ly/eQz4nR

Continue reading …

Playlist

No Comment
Playlist

[ Part 10 ] Zandonai: Francesca da Rimini, opera in four acts ( Daniel Oren ) AC/DC – Heatseeker (Live) Frets On Fire Full Band – Hard (Rock Band AC/DC Mod) [ Part 7 ] Zandonai: Francesca da Rimini, opera in four acts ( Daniel Oren ) David Wild: “Busted”: A Collective Playlist For Governor Scott Walker I would remind Governor Walker of these words from Clarence Darrow: “With all their faults, trade unions have done more for humanity than any other organization of men that ever existed.” Playlist – Daily Trends | Todays trends. | Daily Trends Copy and paste the code below:

Continue reading …

Michelle Rhee is a puzzle. Widely touted as an public education crusader ( who also appears to overstate her qualifications ), she seems to have no problem trashing the teachers’ unions and tenure while promoting charter schools as the answer. And now she’s cuddling up with Rick Scott in Florida to help him privatize Florida public schools. Who is this woman and why is the Obama administration (and Obama himself) so enamored of her ? In a recent Washington Post op-ed, Richard Kahlenberg credits the Obama administration and Democrats for handing Scott Walker a defense for his blatant union-busting: But Walker’s argument – that greedy teachers are putting their own interests over the interests of the public – resonates in part because in recent years, many Democrats have made that argument as well. Exhibit A is former D.C. schools chancellor Michelle Rhee. Under Democratic mayor Adrian Fenty, she repeatedly clashed with the Washington Teachers’ Union, which she said put the interests of adults over those of children. “Cooperation, collaboration, and consensus-building are way overrated,” Rhee said at the Aspen Institute’s education summit in 2008. She told journalist John Merrow it is imperative that teachers-union bargaining rights exclude issues such as devising a fair teacher-evaluation system. Since resigning as chancellor last year, Rhee has launched a new organization , StudentsFirst , with the express goal of raising $1 billion to counter teachers unions. Her approach remains confrontational. In a profound sense, Democrats like Michelle Rhee have paved the way for Scott Walker. But Rhee couldn’t have done it alone. Then-candidate Barack Obama endorsed Rhee in a 2008 debate as a ” wonderful new superintendent ” and later applauded the firing of every single unionized teacher at Central Falls High School in Rhode Island. (The teachers were later rehired.) Rhee’s agenda also received a big boost from liberal movie director Davis Guggenheim, whose film, ” Waiting for ‘Superman ,’ ” implies that teachers unions are to blame for the failures of urban education and that non-unionized charter schools are the solution. The movie includes no acknowledgment that the things teachers want for themselves – more resources devoted to education, smaller class sizes, policies that allow them to keep order in the classroom – are also good for kids. It’s no secret to regular readers of this blog that the Republican end game is to convert our public school systems to private, for-profit concerns, and no one is more committed to that goal than Rick Scott. To that end, there’s a bill being jetstreamed through the Florida state legislature ” reforming education “. The legislation would measure teacher performance based on four categories, and give principals the option to reject teachers who have not been rated highly effective or effective; end teacher contracts for those who receive two unsatisfactory evaluations in three years; give teachers hired after July 1, 2011, annual and not continuing contracts; and put teachers hired after July 1, 2014, on performance-based scales. The House amended its measure (proposed bill 11-01) to mirror a substitute Senate bill (SB736) that passed its final committee Wednesday morning. The measures are speeding toward Gov. Rick Scott, who has said he would sign the bill once it reaches his desk. Former Gov. Charlie Crist famously vetoed SB6, last year’s controversial teacher tenure bill. The bill also mirrors Wisconsin’s legislation forcing teachers to contribute to their retirement and health plans as well as stripping the majority of their collective bargaining rights. Michelle Rhee’s roadmap. Again. And in Tennessee, she’s busy too . The outcome of Rhee’s work, when combined with the travesty that is NCLB and the general assault on teachers is decisions like this one, where a gifted, committed, successful teacher decides she doesn’t want to be a teacher anymore . There are many policy areas where I can make exceptions or give benefit of the doubt, but when it comes to education, I say that President Obama is dead wrong and worse yet, he’s enabling a movement that will gut our educational system. When he goes to Florida and appears with Jeb Bush , the king of school privatization, it’s a shot in the gut of every teacher in the country. I’ve had three kids go through the public school system. My youngest finishes next year. All three have gotten good, solid, strong educations. They know how to think, how to read, how to function and they were or will be college-ready. All three have had wonderful teachers in an underfunded school district which does not serve rich people. It’s diverse and more students are minorities or poor than the other way around. This is not to say public schools are perfect. They’re not. But much of the reason they’re not is the result of No Child Left Behind, which could possibly be the worst “education reform” I’ve ever seen. One of my kids graduated before NCLB took effect. One graduated a few years in. My youngest has spent more years in the system under that idiot law than not. My experience? She got a great education in spite of NCLB and because of her teachers. To lay the problems with our public school system at the feet of teachers and teachers’ unions is ridiculous, yet Rhee persists, and the Obama administration blesses it! What is the matter with them? Daily Kos points out some (possibly) unintended consequences of Rhee’s “advice”: But slashing pensions? Fantastic! Limiting collective bargaining to “basic things like the salary”? Why, that’s the Michelle Rhee program! I think that, you know, unions can collectively bargain over basic things like salary but they don’t have a place in getting involved in policies and so I think that the move to try to limit what they bargain over is an incredibly important one. If teachers are restricted to bargaining over salary and pension issues, how long do you think it will take the Michelle Rhees of this world to start screaming about how teachers are only in it for themselves, and all they care about are their salaries? What’s that you say? That’s already what she and her ilk are saying? Huh. Funny. It’s almost like she’s suggesting policies that will give her an excuse to do more of what she’s already doing. For generations, teachers—and their unions—have fought for increased education funding, smaller class sizes, and other resources. But so-called reformers like Rhee want to squash teachers’ ability to advocate for their students. Her attacks on teachers helped lay the groundwork for what Scott Walker is trying to do. They’ve helped create the atmosphere that’s made talented, dedicated teachers say I don’t want to be a teacher any more. For all the talk about how terrible it is to leave our children and grandchildren in debt, no one seems to be as outraged about how terrible it is to leave our children and grandchildren without hope of a decent education. That is a far broader problem than the national debt, and the Obama administration needs to quit partnering with Michelle Rhee to undermine the public school system. Now.

Continue reading …
Jack Cafferty Calls Social Security a ‘Social Welfare Program’

Click here to view this media You know, I used to have some respect for Jack Cafferty even though I knew back then that we were on primarily opposite ends of the political spectrum because he spoke out against the Bush administration when that wasn’t necessarily the most popular thing for a conservative to be doing, but he just lost me completely here. Calling Social Security a “welfare program” is just shameless. The widows and orphans who receive those benefits do so after a spouse or a parent paid into the system and seniors receive the benefit after paying into it for their entire lives. And unemployment insurance is just that, insurance. It’s not welfare. And does Jack really think we should just leave our elderly, the disabled and young mothers and children with no help to pay their medical bills at all? What cost does he think it would be to our society to just leave those people to rot on the streets? Painting people who receive these benefits as “welfare” recipients paints a picture of a bunch of lazy unemployed people who don’t want to work, and just want to sit on their duffs and collect government benefits. Does he think that most of the people receiving these benefits now haven’t worked for a living most of their lives and paid into the system? At a time when we’ve got record unemployment and underemployment and a lot of good, decent, hard working Americans who would like to find jobs and can’t, asking a question with this frame is doing nothing but trying to pit one middle or lower class individual in the United States against another and get them to resent each other. It’s divide and conquer bulls**t to distract from us from those who have caused our economic problems and they are NOT the elderly, the poor, the unemployed, widows, orphans and young mothers and their children who don’t have any health insurance. Shame on you Jack. Here’s his post at The Cafferty File. Thankfully a lot of the answers if you go read his entire comments section were a whole lot better than his question, but sadly a lot of the comments there were from individuals who’ve bought into the kind of resentment that Cafferty is peddling here. What does it mean if social welfare benefits make up 1/3 of wages, salaries in U.S.? : Americans have become alarmingly dependent on handouts from Uncle Sam, according to a new report. Government social welfare programs like Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and unemployment insurance made up 35% of all public and private wages and salaries last year. That’s more than one-third of all the money Americans earned. These findings are contained in a study of government data done by TrimTabs Investment Research. In 2000, 21% of all wages and salaries in the United States came from social welfare programs. In 1960, it was just 10%. One of the economists at TrimTabs says we’re in for some difficult times ahead unless this country can get back to at least the 26% ratio it had before the recession started. And she says there are only two ways to do that: Either increase private sector wages and salaries by 35% or cut social welfare benefits by nearly a quarter. Neither of those things is likely to happen. Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, the so-called entitlement programs, make up more than 60% of federal spending each year. As the baby boomers get older, retire and need more medical care, the costs for those programs will only go up. While the squabbling over budget cuts continues on Capitol Hill, you can be sure no one is touching these programs. The $60 billion measure passed by the House last month didn’t touch one dime of those three programs. As the evidence continues to mount that our country is hurtling toward an economic disaster, our government refuses to respond in any meaningful way. Here’s my question to you: What does it mean if social welfare benefits make up more than 1/3 of all wages and salaries paid in the U.S.? Interested to know which ones made it on air? Mike in Brooklyn: It means that we’re in a bad Recession. One so bad that it’s really a Depression. What is shocking to me about how you phrase your question, Jack, is that you fail to include all the handouts to businesses (especially the large corporations), trade associations, and “development” commissions, among other entities, that get subsidies. Sylvia in San Diego: It means that we are a welfare nation and in order to recover from this economic disaster, it will be very painful for many. Larry in Springfield, Ohio: Jack, it means that those jobs that Americans refuse to do need to be done by Americans that refuse to do them. If they are able otherwise, we need to stop paying people not to work. A.: Welcome to reality. The middle class used to make money and pay taxes. Now the rich make the money and don’t pay taxes; the poor don’t make money and receive poverty credits to keep them from attacking the system with pitchforks. Patsy: Jack, I’m certainly no authority but how can Social Security be classified as a “handout” when people who draw on it are the same people who used some of their salary to pay into it? It is money earned but saved. The Government should never have borrowed on it in the first place, and technically were not supposed to. If left alone to earn interest, most likely there would be more money now. Nancy in Tennessee: The answer does lie in increasing wages and salaries in the private sector by 35%. It all boils down to jobs. This country needs more jobs that will provide a living wage. Americans are hurting individually and that translates into a hurting American economy. Rick: It means that we are a socialist country, whether we like it or not. And while people may not like the label, just try taking away all that income! Bob: It means I’m in the wrong job!

Continue reading …

Obama Bullying

No Comment
Obama Bullying

StopBullying.Gov Obama Bullying Obama Bullying Commercial Obama: Bullying is abuse, not passage rite :You Web youwb.com Obama: Bullying is abuse, not passage rite. Thursday, March 10th, 2011 at 10:27 am. Published: March. 10, 2011 at 4:30 AM. First lady Michelle Obama and President Barack Obama in Washington, Feb. 3, 2011. UPI/Gary Fabiano/Pool … Obama: Bullying Not a Harmless Rite of Passage | West Orlando News … President Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama called for a united effort to address bullying at the White House Conference on Bullying Prevention. Obama: Bullying needn't be part of growing up | New News You are here : New News » Politics News » Obama: Bullying needn’t be part of growing up. Obama: Bullying needn’t be part of growing up. Published On Thursday 10 Mar 2011 13:21:19 Under: Politics News. Tags: Bullying, Growing, needn’t, … White House Conference On Bullying Prevention — Obama, Duncan … Read More: Barack Obama, Bullying , Bullying Prevention, Education News, Facebook, Michelle Obama, Michelle- Obama-Bullying , Obama Bullying , Prevent School Bullying, School Bullying, Stopbullying.Gov, White House Conference Bullying … Say Anything » Obama Talks About Bullying While Wisconsin Union … Discussion question: I wonder how the left would feel if the tea party protesters had broken into the US capitol to prevent a vote on Obamacare? Tags: Barack Obama, bullying , unions, wisconsin … braininsights says: RT @usatoday : Obama: Bullying 'is not something we have to accept' http://usat.ly/hzbMMo

Continue reading …
Carl Bernstein, Cenk Uygur Team Up to Thrash Muslim-American Hearings as ‘Un-American,’ ‘Coliseum-like Atmosphere’

MSNBC's “panel” on today's hearings about radicalization of Muslim-Americans featured liberals Carl Bernstein and Cenk Uygur – with MSNBC's Richard Lui moderating. With no substantial conservative counterpoints to be offered, the two guests sounded their condemnations of the hearings as “cultural warfare” and bigotry. Bernstein slammed the House inquiry as a joke and as a “debating society for cultural warfare.” Referencing the institution's past for producing McCarthy-ite investigations, he compared the current hearings with the gladiatorial combat of the Roman coliseum. “Now we have this question which is part of this coliseum-like atmosphere of cultural warfare,” Bernstein spat.

Continue reading …

The standoff in Wisconsin ends suddenly when Republican state senators bypass AWOL Democratic state senators to pass collective bargaining restrictions. Ed Lavandera (@edlavacnn) reports for In The Arena.

Continue reading …

Deryck Whibley

No Comment

Sum 41′s Deryck Whibley Hospitalized With Pneumonia Sum 41 frontman Deryck Whibley has had another mishap… just in time to coincide with the release of their fifth-full length album in 10 years, Screaming Bloody Murder . Whibley has contracted a nasty case of pneumonia that has him holed up in a Sydney, Australia hospital bed for, well… it looks like a while. A statement on Sum 41′s website lets fans know the band were cancelling their upcoming Australian tour dates due to Whibley’s illness. The notice also features a tiny black & white photo of Whibley, sprawled out in the aforementioned hospital bed and hooked up to a barrage of wires to prove he’s really not faking it. While we wish Whibley a speedy recovery, it should be brought to attention that this isn’t his first time calling in sick to work. Last August, Whibley faced a sneak attack in a Japanese bar that lead to a brief hospitalization. Weeks prior, some Vans Warped Tour Dates had to be scrapped while Whibley tried to get over a bout of bronchitis. Going back further, there were a slew of concert cancellations in 2005 and 2007 while the singer tried to recoup from a ruptured vocal cord and a back injury, respectively. Dude has been in rough shape for a long time and needs to start taking better care of himself, or an onslaught of those pesky celebrity death rumours will start flying again. Sum 41 are also scheduled to play this year’s Vans Warped Tour. Here’s hoping Whibley’s better in time to perform. Screaming Bloody Murder comes out March 29. Here are Sum 41′s cancelled dates: March 4 Melbourne, Australia @ Melbourne Showgrounds (Soundwave Festival) March 5 Adelaide, Australia @ Bonython Park (Soundwave Festival) March 7 Perth, Australia @ Claremont Showgrounds (Soundwave Festival) These Sum 41 dates remain unaffected by Whibley’s illness (for now at least): March 12 Valencia, Spain @ Ciudad De Las Artes Y De Las Ciencias (free) March 16 Toronto, ON @ Lee’s Palace March 18 Detroit, MI @ The Fillmore Detroit March 25 Ventura, CA @ Majestic Ventura Theatre March 26 Las Vegas, NV @ Desert Breeze Skate Park (Extreme Thing Sports & Music Festival) March 27 San Diego, CA @ House Of Blues San Diego March 29 Pomona, CA @ The Glass House May 17 Sapporo, Japan @ Sapporo Zepp May 19 Sendai, Japan @ Sendai Zepp May 20 Yokohama, Japan @ Yokohama Blitz May 21 Nagoya, Japan @ Nagoya Zepp May 23 Fukuoka, Japan @ Fukuoka Zepp May 24-25 Osaka, Japan @ Osaka Hatch May 27 Tokyo, Japan @ Studio Coast May 28 Tokyo, Japan @ Tokyo Zepp July 2 Nove Mesto Nad Vahom, Slovakia @ Top Fest July 3 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic @ Hradec Kralove Airport July 9 Knebworth, England @ Knebworth House (Sonisphere) Source : Chart Attack

Continue reading …
David Brooks Slams Newt Gingrich: ‘I Wouldn’t Let Him Run a 7-Eleven Let Alone a Country’

New York Times columnist David Brooks Thursday took quite a swing at former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich. During a videotaped interview with Time magazine, Brooks said, “I wouldn't let that guy run a 7-Eleven let alone a country” (video follows with transcript and commentary): GILBERT CRUZ, TIME MAGAZINE: People read you because you write about politics. I was wondering if I could ask you a couple of questions about politics, the first being is Obama beatable in 2012? DAVID BROOKS, NEW YORK TIMES: He’s certainly beatable. The economy is going to be better, but not in great shape. He's got real problems in the Midwest. Those are states that Republicans have done extraordinarily well in, and so I definitely think he’s beatable. I would still give him a slight odds of being reelected, but he’s definitely beatable. CRUZ: What do you think of the GOP field for 2012? BROOKS: I'm not overwhelmed by its quality. Some people are interesting personalities, like Newt Gingrich, but Newt Gingrich is not going to be President. I wouldn't let that guy run a, you know, 7-Eleven, let alone a country. He’s a really interesting guy, no management skills. And, so there are a couple leaders: Mitt Romney and Tim Pawlenty and Mitch Daniels. I think those are the three. And so I’m not sure there’s a huge number of great candidates, and that’s of the weaknesses that Obama has, the one strength he has is so far what looks like the weakness of the Republican field. In the print version of this Q&A, Brooks said: Haley Barbour's a good governor, but he looks like the kind of guy Michael Moore would cast: Southern guy, heavy guy, was a tobacco lobbyist. I just don't think that's going to fly. Readers are reminded that this is what the Times and its readers consider is a conservative.

Continue reading …
Rep. Keith Ellison’s emotional closing remarks

Click here to view this media (YouTube) Rep. Keith Ellison’s (D-MN) emotional closing remarks today at the House Committee on Homeland Security and their inquiry into the extent of radicalization among American Muslims. The committee is chaired by Rep. Peter King (R-NY). ELLISON: Let me close with a story, but remember that it’s only one of many American stories that could be told. Mohammed Salman Hamdani was a 23-year-old paramedic, a New York City police cadet and a Muslim American. He was one of those brave first responders who tragically lost their lives in the 9/11 terrorist attacks almost a decade ago. As The New York Times eulogized, “He wanted to be seen as an all-American kid.” Mr. Hamdani bravely sacrificed his life to try and help others on 9/11. After the tragedy some people tried to smear his character solely because of his Islamic faith. Some people spread false rumors and speculated that he was in league with the attackers only because he was Muslim. It was only when his remains were identified that these lies were fully exposed. Mohammed Salman Hamdani was a fellow American who gave his life for other Americans. His life should not be defined as a member of an ethnic group or a member of a religion, but as an American who gave everything for his fellow citizens. I yield back. As Think Progress noted, “Hamdami’s mother, Talat Hamdani, is at the hearings today. She works with September 11th Families for Peaceful Tomorrows, which opposes the hearings.”

Continue reading …