Home » Posts tagged with » house (Page 180)
The Triangle Fire: Still Burning Before Our Nation

Crossposted with permission from Tula Connell of AFL-CIO Now Blog enlarge Credit: AFL-CIO Now Blog When word got out two weeks ago that Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker had ordered the windows of the state Capitol building bolted shut during the ongoing protests against his attacks on public employees, it was a chilling reminder of a similar action by the employers of the Triangle Shirtwaist factory. Nearly 100 years ago to the day of Walker’s order—which he rescinded after public outrage—146 workers, mostly young immigrant girls, jumped to their deaths from the 10-story building, unable to escape a fire because factory foremen had locked all the doors. The owners, Isaac Harris and Max Blanck, worried the workers would steal from the company. Hyman Meshel worked on the eighth floor. When the rescue crew found Meshel, who was still alive, the flesh of the palms of his hands had been torn from the bones by his sliding down the steel cable in the elevator, and his knuckles and forearms were full of glass splinters from beating his way through the glass door of the elevator shaft. Thirty dead bodies clogged the elevator shaft. All were young girls. Among the many victims, the New York Times reported the day after the disaster, were two girls: charred beyond all hope of recognition, and found in the smoking ruins with their arms clasped around each other’s necks…. Three weeks before the Triangle conflagration, the Protective League of Property Owners had held a meeting, indignant over orders by Fire Commissioner Rhinelander Waldo to install sprinklers in warehouses. Owners claimed the order amounted to a “ confiscation of property .” The League wasn’t the only employer group to put profit over safety. As the New York Times reported, Fire Chief Edward Croker: spoke bitterly of the way in which the Manufacturers’ Association had called a meeting in Wall Street to take measures against his proposal for enforcing better methods of protection for employees in case of fire. His department had cited the Triangle building for lack of fire escapes just one week before the fire. The working conditions at Triangle and other apparel factories had spurred tens of thousands of shirtwaist workers from more than 500 factories to walk off their jobs in November 1909. Led by the International Ladies’ Garment Workers Union (ILGWU), they demanded a 20 percent pay raise, a 52-hour workweek and extra pay for overtime. They also called for adequate fire escapes and open doors from the factories to the street. By February 1910, most of the small and midsized factories, and some of the larger employers, had negotiated a settlement for higher pay and shorter hours. One of the companies that refused to settle was the Triangle Waist Company, one of New York’s largest garment makers. The Triangle fire resulted in enactment of stricter job safety and health regulations in New York and across the country. The ordeal of the victims, who are remembered here by Cornell University, has inspired countless memorials, tributes and documentaries, beginning April 30, 1911, when 50,000 New Yorkers marched behind empty hearses to memorialize those killed in the fire. But as we commemorate the 100th anniversary of the Triangle Shirtwaist fire on March 25, it’s sobering to realize many of the lessons we thought had been absorbed must be re-learned again. And again. The Triangle fire, a symbol of unfettered Gilded Age greed, still stands burning before us—from lack of job safety and health protections, to neglect of the conditions endured by immigrant workers to the fundamental ability of workers to form unions and bargain for a better life. The following three perspectives highlight how the issues behind the Triangle fire still have not been resolved. America’s Immigrant Workers When most of us think how the immigrant workers were treated at the Triangle Shirtwaist factory, we are convinced such environments no longer exist in this country. Not so, says Ai-jen Poo. As the founder of Domestic Workers United based in New York, Poo has helped lead a movement of some the nation’s most invisible workers, those not covered by standard U.S. labor laws and hidden from view in countless homes. Last year, through the efforts of Domestic Workers United, the New York State Legislature enacted a precedent-setting law covering the wages, severance pay and sick days of the state’s estimated 200,000 nannies and housekeepers. The Domestic Workers Bill of Rights is a model for domestic workers who, despite the odds, are joining together and demanding their basic human rights on the job. Immigrant workers face attacks by hostile state legislatures Some of the industries today where many immigrant workers are on the job are unregulated and have fallen outside the protection of existing labor laws, including the right to organize, says Poo. But while these industries were once considered marginal, [t]hey are increasingly defining the entire direction of this economy, where workers, whether immigrant or not, are experiencing dangerous working conditions, long working hours and low wages. This “shadow” economy, with its long hours, low wages and dangerous conditions in which people are overworked and yet still poor, is “more the norm,” says Poo—and worse: It’s a good window into the economic health of this country which is not very healthy. Just as at the turn of the century you could look at the manufacturing industry and see the economy wasn’t healthy. But after Triangle and after countless more outrages, known and unknown, at the workplace, workers took their futures in their hands and reshaped the economy. We’re now in a very similar moment. We’re standing at the precipice of a major crisis for working people in their country, another moment where we have to stand up as immigrant workers and all workers to take back our rights and dignity in the workplace and in the economy as a whole. As Poo says, the actions of immigrant workers to organize against all odds in these workplaces can offer an example for us all as we search for ways to regroup and move forward. Job Safety and Health Last April, 99 years after the Triangle disaster, 29 miners were killed at West Virginia’s Upper Big Branch mine in an explosion that the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) says could have been prevented if the mine had been in compliance with federal mine safety rules. Massey Energy, the mine’s owner, had a significant history of safety violations . The coal industry isn’t the only one where U.S. workers die at work. In 2008, 5,214 workers were killed on the job , another 50,000 workers died from occupational diseases, and at least 4.6 million workers were reported injured. The disasters last year that killed those miners could have been avoided had lawmakers resisted lobbying by mine owners, says Peter Dreier. Dreier, who teaches politics and chairs the Urban and Environmental Policy Department at Occidental College, says that today , the the leading foe of reform is the United States Chamber of Commerce, which is on a crusade against the Obama administration’s plans to set new rules on unsafe workplaces, industrial hazards and threats to public health. The Chamber’s most vocal proponent is Darrell Issa, the conservative California Republican who chairs the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. At the request of the Chamber and other industry lobbies, Issa recently launched a congressional assault on safeguards in workplaces and communities. The American Petroleum Institute, the National Association of Manufacturers, the Association of American Railroads, the National Petrochemical & Refiners Association, and lobbies representing health care, banking, and telecommunication providers are lobbying to scale back the gamut of job safety and health laws that protect millions of workers. And Republicans are doing their bidding. In a piece on Triangle , Dreier and Donald Cohen, director of the Cry Wolf Project that counters attempts to discredit progressive policies, write that Republicans in Congress are proposing to cut OSHA’s budget by 20 percent, which, coming on top of decades of cuts, would cripple an agency that has been effective at significantly reducing workplace injuries and deaths. A century after the Triangle fire, “we still hear much of the same rhetoric whenever reformers seek to use government” to get businesses act more responsibly and protect consumers, workers and the environment. The Republican leadership is trying to drive home the message, in Speaker John Boehner’s words, that “excessive regulation costs jobs” and that the “path to prosperity” is by “getting government out of the way.” Americans of earlier generations—who enjoyed the benefits of the Progressive Era and the New Deal reforms, and the political clout of a vibrant labor movement—understood this was nonsense, but it seems like the lessons of the past have to be relearned again. Freedom to Form Unions enlarge When newly-elected Republican Gov. Scott Walker proposed taking collective bargaining rights away from Wisconsin public employees early this year, Chad Goldberg joined tens of thousands—sometimes hundreds of thousands—of state residents to protest the move. He and others spent the night at the Capitol to ensure the governor didn’t shut them out, in addition to taking part in rallies during the state’s bitter winter. The Wisconsin uprising has lasted for more than five weeks, sparking solidarity rallies across the country and generating support from as far away as Egypt and Australia. Goldberg, an associate professor of sociology at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, notes the bitter irony that on the 100th anniversary of the Triangle fire, Walker is turning the clock back in Wisconsin, refusing to work with unions or allow public employees to bargain over working conditions. “The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire showed what can happen when employers refuse to work with unions,” says Goldberg, vice president of United Faculty & Academic Staff (UFAS), AFT Local 223. If the factory owners had negotiated with the garment workers’ union, which demanded a decent fire escape and better safety conditions, 146 lives would have been saved. The Republican-controlled legislature approved Walker’s proposal to gut collective bargaining, saying the action would help the state’s budget. But Goldberg and others know the move was political —taking away the freedom of workers to bargain has nothing to do with balancing the budget. In state after state, similar attacks on the rights of workers to bargain for good middle class jobs are aimed at gutting the strength of workers and stacking the deck in favor of CEOs and Wall Street. Collective bargaining rights are a matter of basic fairness, says Goldberg. Collective bargaining “strengthens shared governance, needed checks and balances and accountability and improves working conditions.” Our working conditions are students’ learning conditions and when you improve one, you improve the other. The Triangle fire “also showed how arrogance and oppression can galvanize the public to demand better treatment for workers,” he says. “The governor’s arrogance, the arrogance of the public legislators, the way they’re overreaching and the extremist nature of their agenda is really fueling a public reaction in defense of workers’ rights and public services. The Triangle fire led to the growth of the garment workers’ union and the strengthening of fire, health, and labor regulations. Today in Wisconsin, we’re seeing the same kind of public mobilization to defend workers’ rights and the public services on which working families depend. Resources Columbia University’s Remembering the Triangle Factory Fire site offers details of the events, the reforms it sparked and educational resources for teachers. The U.S. Department of Labor offers a mobile-optimized website to commemorate the anniversary, featuring an audio tour and background of the event. When you travel to one of the locations for the Triangle Shirtwaist factory fire you can listen to an audio description of the location by clicking on the link within the page. Remember the Triangle Fire Coalition offers a range of events commemorating the 100th anniversary.

Continue reading …
Arizona Sheriff Arpaio and Steven Seagal send in the tanks to bust up chickens

Click here to view this media America has gone crazy! Well, Arizona certainly leads the way to bizzaro land with the actions of Sheriff Joe Arpaio . And is there such a thing as Action Star Steven Seagal anymore? Sheriff Joe Arpaio rolled out the tanks to take down a man suspected of cockfighting. West Valley residents in the neighborhood are crying foul after armored vehicles, including a tank, rolled into their neighborhood to make the bust. Neighbor Debra Ross was so worried she called 911 and went outside where a nearby home had its windows blown out, was crawling with dozens of SWAT members in full gear, armored vehicles and a bomb robot .“When the tank came in and pushed the wall over and you see what’s in there, and all it is, is a bunch of chickens,” Ross said. In a massive show of force on Monday, the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office executed a search warrant and arrested the homeowner, Jesus Llovera, on charges of suspected cockfighting. Llovera was alone in the house at the time of the arrest, and he was unarmed.“I think taxpayers should be shocked,” said Robert Campus, Llovera’s attorney. Campus said he believes the operation costs tens of thousands of dollars. Deputies had no probable cause to believe Llovera was armed or dangerous, according to Campus. Campus said he believes the entire scene was basically a stage, to help actor Steven Seagal’s TV show, “Lawman.” Seagal was riding in the tank . The Sheriff’s Department has entered into a contract with Seagal and part of that contract gives Seagal carte blanche to go along with the sheriff as he arrests people. Thousands of dollars in damages were made to the property and 115 birds were euthanized on the spot.Llovera was convicted of a misdemeanor last year of attending a cockfight and has no history of owning weapons. Yet the sheriff’s office said they had reasons to believe Llovera might be armed. “We’re going to err on the side of caution. We’re going to make sure that we have the appropriate amount of force in case we do run into anything like that,” said Sgt. Jesse Spurgin. We noticed that Seagal had been recruited along with Lou Ferrigno into Arpaio’s “posse” of brown-people-rounder-uppers back when it happened. Gee, who could have foreseen it would turn out to be a gigantic publicity stunt at taxpayer expense?

Continue reading …
Arizona Sheriff Arpaio and Steven Seagal send in the tanks to bust up chickens

Click here to view this media America has gone crazy! Well, Arizona certainly leads the way to bizzaro land with the actions of Sheriff Joe Arpaio . And is there such a thing as Action Star Steven Seagal anymore? Sheriff Joe Arpaio rolled out the tanks to take down a man suspected of cockfighting. West Valley residents in the neighborhood are crying foul after armored vehicles, including a tank, rolled into their neighborhood to make the bust. Neighbor Debra Ross was so worried she called 911 and went outside where a nearby home had its windows blown out, was crawling with dozens of SWAT members in full gear, armored vehicles and a bomb robot .“When the tank came in and pushed the wall over and you see what’s in there, and all it is, is a bunch of chickens,” Ross said. In a massive show of force on Monday, the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office executed a search warrant and arrested the homeowner, Jesus Llovera, on charges of suspected cockfighting. Llovera was alone in the house at the time of the arrest, and he was unarmed.“I think taxpayers should be shocked,” said Robert Campus, Llovera’s attorney. Campus said he believes the operation costs tens of thousands of dollars. Deputies had no probable cause to believe Llovera was armed or dangerous, according to Campus. Campus said he believes the entire scene was basically a stage, to help actor Steven Seagal’s TV show, “Lawman.” Seagal was riding in the tank . The Sheriff’s Department has entered into a contract with Seagal and part of that contract gives Seagal carte blanche to go along with the sheriff as he arrests people. Thousands of dollars in damages were made to the property and 115 birds were euthanized on the spot.Llovera was convicted of a misdemeanor last year of attending a cockfight and has no history of owning weapons. Yet the sheriff’s office said they had reasons to believe Llovera might be armed. “We’re going to err on the side of caution. We’re going to make sure that we have the appropriate amount of force in case we do run into anything like that,” said Sgt. Jesse Spurgin. We noticed that Seagal had been recruited along with Lou Ferrigno into Arpaio’s “posse” of brown-people-rounder-uppers back when it happened. Gee, who could have foreseen it would turn out to be a gigantic publicity stunt at taxpayer expense?

Continue reading …
O’Callaghan body ‘moved after death’

Police find missing woman’s body and search continues for second, which they believe is of victim from case years ago Police investigating the murder of Sian O’Callaghan believe her body had been moved before it was recovered from an area near the village of Uffington, about 15 miles east of Swindon. A postmortem on the 22-year-old woman, who went missing after leaving a nightclub early last Saturday, was under way, Wiltshire police revealed at a press conference on Friday. A suspect being held on suspicion of kidnap and two murders had also led police to a location near the Gloucester village of Northleach in the Cotswolds, where they are now searching for a second body, said Detective Superintendent Steve Fulcher. He has not been charged and police said that an application might have to be made to magistrates for his continued detention. Police have carried out searches at the house of a Swindon taxi driver named locally as 47-year-old Christopher Halliwell, as well as at Savernake forest in Wiltshire, where O’Callaghan’s phone is known to have been taken after she vanished. Fulcher, who was taken personally to the two areas under investigation by the suspect, said: “We believe Sian’s body was moved to the Uffington area by this individual.” The Northleach search had continued through the night. It was “a painstaking, slow process”. If there was another body, “we believe it relates to an incident some years ago and it is an adult,” said Fulcher. Wiltshire police only had one such missing-person case on its files, he added. The man in custody was arrested on suspicion of kidnap on Thursday after police stopped a green Toyota Avensis estate car. O’Callaghan disappeared after leaving the Suju nightclub in the Old Town area of Swindon at 2.52am on Saturday. She had been expected to walk the half mile to the flat she shared with her boyfriend, Kevin Reape, 25, but did not arrive and was reported missing a few hours later. People have been leaving flowers, cards and candles at the entrance to the nightclub. Police have appealed to those using pubs and nightclubs locally “to do so wisely”. Crime James Meikle guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
A Case for the (Completely Unfashionable) Full English Breakfast

Rollerbladers and sectional couches aside, there are few things as unfashionable in modern Manhattan as hearty breakfasts. On weekdays, convenience is king: New Yorkers favor smoothies, breakfast bars, anything that you can ingest while simultaneously tying a necktie, writing an email, and hailing a cab. As for the weekends? Sure, the Big Apple might be known as the city never sleeps and always brunches, but look closely at those morning meals and you’ll see bistro tables littered with coffee press pots, yogurt-granola parfaits, fruit cups, egg white omelets, and fresh-squeezed fruit juices. These are the dainty, heart-healthy stuffs of a modern day breakfast, perfect fuel for an afternoon spent doing nothing more strenuous than the Sunday crossword puzzle. Weekend mornings tend to go a little differently in my household. I live with an Englishman, you see, one with a hummingbird metabolism who likes to clock 50 miles on the bicycle before I’m done hitting ‘snooze.’ Shopping for our groceries is like provisioning an army, and after a man-sized workout, attempting to sate him on yogurt, fruit, toast, or anything of the sort is an exercise in futility. He could eat like that all day, taking down every last blueberry and grain of muesli in the house and still rummaging through the fridge for more. Luckily I’ve hit on a solution: the Full English Breakfast, which is my domestic equivalent of throwing King Kong a commuter train to gnaw on. A Full English Breakfast (a.k.a The Fully Monty, a.k.a. A Fry Up) consists of some combination of fried eggs, bacon, sausages, tomato, toast, black pudding, potatoes, mushrooms and baked beans. Everything but the baked beans can (and should!) be cooked in a cast-iron skillet, in concert with lots of oil and butter, then slopped onto a plate in a messy, steaming heap. It’s a fat and protein-laden meal that came into existence around the time of the industrial revolution, ideal if you’re going to spend your morning down a mine shaft, in a textile mill, or similar. In my estimation it sits up there with strawberries & cream and marmalade as Britain’s greatest culinary gifts to the world. “The only way to eat well in England is to have breakfast three times a day,” W. Somerset Maugham once said. Quite right. Fast-forward to modern times, and we all know why we shouldn’t eat a Full Monty — it’s calorie-rich, heavy on meat and grease, and light on vitamins and minerals. It’s the kind of thing that would make Mark Bittman, he of veganism-till-six and Meatless Mondays, awake in a cold, shaky sweat. I can assure you that Kate Middleton wouldn’t touch a Full English Breakfast with a ten foot polo mallet, lest she absorb some of the wafting bacon grease through her pores, daahhling. But there are also plenty of good reasons why you should tuck into a big fry up every so often — actually, just one big reason. Because it’s so delicious. It’s decadent, excellent recovery food after a marathon (of both the running and drinking varieties), and manages to put a large, goofy smile on my face until dinnertime. Nutritionists have long been encouraging us to have our biggest meal of the day at breakfast. I can’t be positive that they’re talking about a big plate of fried things, but still. The bread, eggs, tomatoes, baked beans, and mushrooms should be easily found in your local grocery store. Black pudding is optional. Sausages should be 100% pork and bacon should ideally be back bacon — our American bacon is made from pork belly, but traditional British and Irish bacon is made from cured pork back (also called pork loin). I mail order big quantities of both from an excellent Chicago-based purveyor called Spencer’s, and freeze the extras. Full English Breakfast Serves 2 4 sausages 4 pieces back bacon 2 eggs 1 can baked beans 1 tomato, halved through the equator 2 handfuls button mushrooms, thickly sliced 2 pieces good bread, e.g. country loaf bread Canola oil Butter Heat a cast iron skillet with a splash of canola oil. I like to cook the bacon and sausages over very moderate heat (the sausages will take longer then the bacon), then turn up the heat for the mushrooms and tomatoes, which need a good strong sear. Toast can either be fried in the bacon and sausage fat or done in the toaster. Beans can be heated on the stove or in the microwave. Finish up by melting a pat of butter and frying the eggs, flicking a little of the hot fat over the yolk to seal it. Divide all the goodies between two plates, and supplement with a steaming cup of coffee and a glass of cold orange juice.

Continue reading …
Siri Hustvedt: life and other fiction

Siri Hustvedt’s new novel, The Summer Without Men, deals with many women’s worst fear: your husband leaving you in middle age. Just don’t ask her if she and Paul Auster are having marital problems Recently, the American author Siri Hustvedt received an annoying, if all

Continue reading …
Ed Schultz Asks Who Is Standing Up for the Long Term Unemployed

Click here to view this media While I don’t agree with Ed Schultz for supporting what we’re doing in Libya because I think we just put ourselves in another open-ended bottomless pit with what this military commitment might cost the taxpayers when we’re not taking care of our own at home, I do agree with him and his sentiments in this clip. Republicans carp constantly about creating jobs, but they’ve done little to nothing to take care of the long term unemployed since taking power in the House. Where are the jobs John Boehner? As Ed noted, the attempts by some of the Democrats to get unemployment benefits extended for the long term unemployed are likely going to come with the caveat of more tax cuts for their buddies in big business. And as Ed also noted, when is Boehner going to decide to take some time away from his golf game and start doing something in the House to create jobs here in the United States. I’d like to see all of our politicians finally standing up against the race to the bottom with us competing against sweatshop wages overseas. The only jobs I see Republicans creating are ones where someone needs to work two or three jobs just to get by in the US, or a job by some foreign manufacturer where there aren’t any labor protections and those people work for slave labor wages while their employers enrich themselves.

Continue reading …

Thank you to Eric Dolan at Raw Story for bringing attention to this. 100 years after the Triangle Shirtwaist fire which I wrote about here , we’re still seeing these abusive conditions in sweatshops around the world. We got rid of them here and just outsourced our slavery so we didn’t have to look at it. Young women continue to die locked in sweatshops, labor group warns : As the 100th anniversary of the Triangle Shirtwaist factory fire approaches, the Institute for Global Labor and Human Rights urged the United States to pass legislation to prevent multi-national corporations from violating internationally recognized worker rights standards, such as no child or forced labor, decent working conditions, freedom of association and the right to organize a union. The Triangle Shirtwaist factory fire resulted in the death of 146 female workers, who were locked inside the factory by their managers, on March 25, 1911. The women worked 6 days a week, often 14 hours shifts, and earned the meager wage of 14 cents an hour. (The equivalent of $3.18 an hour in 2011, adjusted for inflation.) After the death of workers in a Bangladesh sweatshop, the Institute for Global Labor and Human Rights said now was the time to hold corporations accountable to respect labor laws and pass the Decent Working Conditions and Fair Competition Act. The Decent Working Conditions and Fair Competition Act was introduced by a bipartisan group of senators in 2007, but never made it out of House and Senate committees. The bill would have prohibited the import, export, and sale of goods made with sweatshop labor. More there on how we failed to get any legislation through the Congress here in the US to put a stop to this, so go read the rest of the article. And as he referred to in his article, here’s more from the Institute for Global Labor and Human Rights. Triangle Returns: Young Women Continue to Die Locked in Sweatshops : Institute for Global Labour and Human Rights Releases Explosive New Video and Report for the 100th Anniversary of the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire Triangle Returns on YouTube : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=noL8nFSzsDc Triangle Returns – broadcast quality : http://www3.usw.org/download/triangle_race_to_the_bottom_r2.mov Report: Triangle Returns: Young Women Continue to Die Locked in Sweatshops : http://www.nlcnet.org/admin/reports/files/Triangle-Returns.pdf Supplemental footage : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJG_o94mWqA NEW YORK and PITTSBURGH, March 23, 2011 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — On the 100th anniversary of the Triangle Shirtwaist factory fire in New York City on March 25, 1911, workers in the developing world continue to die needlessly in sweatshops with locked exits. Just three months shy of the 100th anniversary of the Triangle fire, on December 14, 2010, a fire broke out at the Hameem factory in Bangladesh, which was sewing garments for Gap. The fire alarms did not go off, and the emergency exits were locked on the 9th floor, killing 29 workers-many of whom jumped to their deaths-and injuring over 100. At Hameem, the workers toil 12 to 14 hours a day, seven days a week, with just a single day off a month. The highest wage at Hameem is 28 cents an hour–less than one-tenth of what the Triangle workers earned 100 years ago! (Adjusted for inflation, the 14 centsan hour they earned in 1911 is worth $3.18 an hour today.) The garment workers in Bangladesh are trapped in misery, living in makeshift hovels. Just months before the tragic fire, Triangle workers had led a strike movement to organize garment workers in New York City-and ultimately been beaten back by their own factory’s management. In Hameem too, management busted a union organizing drive in September 2008, imprisoning the union president and firing all 19 of the lead activists. It did not matter that well over half of the workers supported the union’s demands. When the workers in Bangladesh took to the streets in July 2010 demanding a 35-cent-an-hour wage, they were beaten with clubs. The police shot rubber bullets and used power water cannons to sweep the workers off their feet. There was dye in the water so that demonstrating workers could be identified and imprisoned later. We are at a cross roads. We can stand back and allow corporations to drive this Race to the Bottom, exploiting sweatshop workers across the developing world, as wages and benefits are also cut for working Americans. Or, we can fight back, and hold corporations accountable to respect local labor and minimum wage laws and the core internationally recognized worker rights standards-no child labor, no forced labor, freedom of association, the right to organize and bargain collectively. The choice is ours. And here’s more from their site where they did a side by side analysis of the similarities between the fire at Triangle 100 years ago and the fire in Savar, Bangladesh that just occurred in December of last year. Triangle Returns: Young Women Continue to Die in Locked Sweatshops : On the 100th Anniversary of the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire Little Has Changed in the Global Sweatshop Economy

Continue reading …
As the Tea Partiers run wild in Montana, the folks with common sense start to turn away

Click here to view this media Douglas Kennedy eagerly filed this report from the wilds of Montana this morning for Fox News, describing the exploits of a Montana Tea Party Republican legislator named Greg Hinkle, from Thompson Falls — just coincidentally the home of the Militia of Montana … Hinkle is a Republican state senator from Thomson Falls, and he recently proposed a law, likely the first of its kind, asking federal law enforcement to first seek approval of county sheriffs before any federal intervention in the state of Montana. He calls it “The Sheriffs First Bill.” “I believe that before any federal agency does any action within a county,” he explained, “they should cooperate with the sheriff, coordinate with the sheriff and go to him and say this is what we need to do in this county.” For instance, Hinkle would want the FBI to first notify a Montana sheriff before executing a search warrant or making an arrest in the state of Montana. At one point he allowed for arrest of any federal agent who didn’t comply, but has since taken out that language. He also reluctantly added a line that allows for federal agents to notify sheriffs “after the fact,” in order to get the bill through the Montana House of Representatives. Nonetheless, legal observers still call Hinkle’s bill “a clear violation of the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution.” “The federal government does not have to ask or even inform local law enforcement about what they are doing,” said James Cohen, a constitutional law professor at Fordham Law School in New York. “Sometimes they do because it’s convenient, but they do not have to.” Hinkle points out that the bill has already passed the Montana State Senate (with the original language) and is expected to pass the House in the next couple of weeks. He also says there’s a lot of support in Montana, a state which he says well remembers the deadly federal raids at Ruby Ridge, Idaho, in 1992 and Waco, Texas, in 1993. Funny that a parachuting reporter would forget this, but in reality, Montanans remember even better the longest armed standoff with federal agents in history: the 81-day FBI standoff in Jordan with the Montana Freemen. (Yes, yours truly was there. ) As Jim Lopach, a professor of constitutional law at the University of Montana, put it in a retrospective piece: Lopach said the real legacy of the standoff could be that it gave people a reason to consider how far and how deep devotion to political individualism should go. “It might be a moderating thing,” he said. “It might be that they saw the dangers of extremism.” In reality, Hinkle’s bill is one we’ve known about for awhile. It was one of a package of bills that Montana Patriot-movement leader Gary Marbut announced last September in Hamilton at a gathering I covered. (You can watch the video of Marbut describing it here. ) Tonight Marbut wants to talk about a new piece of sovereignty legislation he plans to promote in the state legislature, something he calls Sheriffs First. The bill would make it a crime in Montana for a federal officer to arrest, search or seize without advance written permission from the county sheriff, Marbut explains, to enthusiastic applause. “How that will work is, the federal officers might come to your local sheriff and say, ‘OK, here’s our probable cause, we believe there’s people at this location in your county who have a meth lab …and we wanna bust ‘em,’” Marbut says. “The sheriff might look it over and say, ‘Gosh, I’m glad you brought this to me, here’s your advance written permission, and I will send a couple deputies to help you.’ “Or the federal officers might come to the sheriff and say, ‘Here’s our probable cause, it leads us to believe there’s somebody in your county at this location who’s manufacturing firearms without a federal license. And we want to go bust them.’ The sheriff might say, ‘Sorry, we have a state law in Montana that authorizes that activity, it’s perfectly legal here, you may not go bust them, you do not have permission, and if you do, we can put you in Deer Lodge. We can put you behind bars in Montana for doing that.’” That brings out whoops alongside the applause. Kennedy’s fawning coverage at Fox concluded thus: “They can’t do it,” [Fordham law professor James Cohen] said. “They can’t pass a law that says the federal government, the FBI, the [Drug Enforcement Agency], whatever federal law enforcement agency, must contact the sheriff before engaging in law enforcement activities. It simply can’t be done.” Of course it can, said Hinkle. “How on earth could the states not challenge federal law?” he asked. “That’s the way our system of government works.” “The states are what created the federal government,” he added, “so the states should actually have more authority than the federal government.” This is one of the more breathtaking aspects of this legislation: It so clearly flies in the face of the Constitution as to be absurd, and yet its proponents are some of the loudest proponents of their version of so-called “constitutionalism.” These are the Tea Partiers who swept to power in Montana in the last election, and boy, are they making their mark. But it may not be the one they long for. Longtime Montanans are well acquainted with these kooks, and the more they rant and rage and embarrass the state, they more they turn people off. An AP story from a few weeks back pointed this out: HELENA, Mont. – With each bill, newly elected tea party lawmakers are offering Montanans a vision of the future. Their state would be a place where officials can ignore U.S. laws, force FBI agents to get a sheriff’s OK before arresting anyone, ban abortions, limit sex education in schools and create armed citizen militias. It’s the tea party world. But not everyone is buying their vision. Some residents, Democratic Gov. Brian Schweitzer and even some Republican lawmakers say the bills are making Montana into a laughingstock. And, they say, the push to nullify federal laws could be dangerous. “We are the United States of America,” said Schweitzer. “This talk of nullifying is pretty toxic talk. That led to the Civil War.” A tea party lawmaker said raising the specter of a civil war is plain old malarkey. “Nullification is not about splitting this union apart,” freshman Rep. Derek Skees said. “Nullification is just one more way for us to tell the federal government: ‘That is not right.” There’s been a substantial influx of these extremists into the state from elsewhere in the past decade, many of them drawn by cheap land and their own internalized mythology of the Western landscape what Montanans are like (think “rugged individualism”). Perhaps no one symbolizes this influx better than Chuck Baldwin, the erstwhile presidential candidate of the Constitution Party, who recently moved to the Flathead Valley from Florida. Baldwin held a shindig in Kalispell, where he was feted by local white supremacists and other supporters. He all but announced that he was planning to run for governor, in hopes of displacing Schweitzer. And he voiced the view of a lot of these newcomers: Baldwin went on to state that being born in Montana does not necessarily make one a Montanan. “There are a lot of people that were born in Montana but are not Montanans,” Baldwin said. “And there are a lot of people, like me, who were not born in Montana but we have been Montanans our whole lives.” (Baldwin arrived in the Flathead in October.) “Real Montanans love freedom,” he said. “Real Montanans will fight and die for the principles of truth, honor and freedom.” Here’s hoping he and his fellow Montana Tea Partiers run on that kind of platform. Sounds like a surefire winner with all the lifelong Montanans I know.

Continue reading …
Maine’s New Teabag Gov Wants to Wipe Out History of the Labor Movement. Political Correctness in Action!

enlarge Panels 7-9 of “The History of Labor in the State of Maine,” by Maine artist Judy Taylor. Democrats are the ones who are always taunted by the Republicans for being “politically correct,” but when was the last time you heard of a Democrat doing something so stupid, silly and just plain mean as this ? Teabag Gov. LePage is so incredibly tone deaf to the mainstream, I’ll be surprised if he makes it through an entire term without a recall movement: Once again, Republicans are trying to erase the history of America’s working people. In Maine, Republican Gov. Paul LePage has ordered the removal of a 36-foot mural depicting the state’s labor history from the Department of Labor. The 11-panel piece in part depicts a 1986 paper mill strike and “Rosie the Riveter” at Bath Iron Works. Judy Taylor, an artist based on Mount Desert, won a 2007 competition to create the mural to depict the “History of Labor in the State of Maine.” Further, the names of conference rooms are being changed to make them more “business friendly.” One is called the “Perkins Room,” for Frances Perkins, the first female Secretary of Labor and promoter of New Deal policies that improved workers’ rights on the job. Perkins championed labor reforms after the 1911 Triangle Shirtwaist fire that resulted in the deaths of 146 garment workers in New York City. This Friday is the 100th anniversary of that tragedy. In a March 22 e-mail to staff , Maine’s acting commissioner of Labor Laura Boyett wrote: We have received feedback that the administration building is not perceived as equally receptive to both businesses and workers – primarily because of the nature of the mural in the lobby and the names of our conference rooms. From the Maine Sun Journal : According to LePage spokesman Dan Demeritt, the administration felt the mural and the conference room monikers showed “one-sided decor” not in keeping with the department’s pro-business goals. “The message from state agencies needs to be balanced,” said Demeritt, adding that the mural had sparked complaints from “some business owners” who complained it was hostile to business. I suppose the next thing is, they’ll want to change the name from Department of Labor to Department of Management? The governor “wants to pick a battle with working people,” says Maine AFL-CIO Presiden Don Berry. Paul LePage cannot erase our history, and he will not silence the voice of the working class in Maine. In 2009, Republicans on the Texas School Board successfully pushed to remove mention of farmworker leader Cesar Chavez and Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall. And when Republicans took over the House in 1995, then-House Speaker Newt Gingrich relegated to the bowels of the Capitol a depiction of the 1912 Bread and Roses strike by artist Ralph Fasanella that had graced the Capitol. Members of the AFL-CIO Building and Construction Trades Dept. then purchased it for our building in Washington, D.C.

Continue reading …