Home » Posts tagged with » house (Page 148)
The Real Reason You’re Not Married (And What to Do About It)

Whether it’s those lurking peak wedding months or the daily talk of royal nuptials, marriage is a subject we’re hearing a lot about lately. Feelings about this trend seem to range from wild enthusiasm to mild resentment. Forgetting for a minute the adversity surrounding the institution of marriage and setting all ceremony aside, stripped down to its barest of bones, marriage is really just a long-term commitment to a serious intimate relationship. Regardless of one’s feeling about marriage, the idea of a lasting romantic relationship is of much significance to most people. So, despite this post’s provocative name, what I really wish to offer here isn’t so much a lecture on why a person isn’t married but an explanation of why many people aren’t able to form a lasting union with someone they love. For many couples, the honeymoon phase is over before they even make it down the aisle. The reasons for this can be many, but one of them is a prevailing fear of intimacy. In nearly 30 years of research into the psychology of interpersonal relationships, both I and my father, psychologist and author Robert Firestone, Ph.D., have closely followed hundreds of clients and case studies of couples. In our research we have found overwhelming consistency in certain behavioral patterns that systematically sabotage real intimacy. First off, the search for a partner to whom we feel a real attraction and deep connection is a challenge that it would be foolish to underestimate. The idea of a soul mate is a pleasing way to maintain faith that there is that perfect someone out there just waiting to complete us. The trouble is that when we seek this someone, we don’t just look for a person who enhances our every attribute; we also look for people who match with our negative traits or fill holes leftover from our past. If we are used to taking control, we may seek someone who is passive. If we are used to being a wallflower, we may seek someone who dominates conversations. Though the match may seem to work well or make us feel secure in the beginning, eventually we grow to resent our partners for the very quality that drew us to them in the first place. As I wrote in my recent blog “Why You Keep Winding Up in the Same Relationship,” the romantic choices we make are heavily informed by our early life experiences. If we grew up being treated as incompetent, it’s very likely that we will seek out a partner who perceives us as incompetent. If we were intruded on, we’re likely to choose someone who is overly attentive, focused or jealous. Conversely, we may seek someone who compensates for our pasts by acting distant or aloof. These often unconscious negative motivators reside within us like mis-attuned matchmakers, driving us toward destructive partners. For example, a woman who grew up feeling rejected by her parents found herself choosing men who were distant and resistant to commitment. When she finally met someone who showed a real interest in her, however, she struggled to accept his affections. Even though her partner possessed the traits she’d thought she wanted, in many ways it was more comfortable to her to choose a more rejecting personality that fit familiarly into her previous self-image and past experience. Going against our negative instincts and choosing someone who brings out the best in us is the first step toward finding lasting love. Yet, even when we find someone who is “good for us,” there are many things we do to push love away. In “Committed: A Skeptic Makes Peace with Marriage,” author Elizabeth Gilbert wrote, “I mean, once the initial madness of desire has passed and we are faced with each other as dimwitted mortal fools, how is it that any of us find the ability to love and forgive each other at all, much less enduringly?” Every human is flawed. Perfect soul mates don’t exist, because perfect people don’t exist. We have all been hurt in very particular ways that then allow us to hurt those close to us in other very particular ways. One of the ways we hurt our relationship is by distorting our partners. The flaws that drive us away from a loved one don’t just appear the minute we move in or say “I do.” They were there from the beginning when we weren’t as likely to blow them out of proportion. Yes, it is true, that often the closer we get to someone, the more driven we become to push them away. This is also a side-effect of a fear of intimacy lingering below the surface and warning us not to be too vulnerable or too intimate. However, this fear also motivates us to react to our partners in ways that are excessively controlling, critical and unkind. We start to read negative intent into our partner’s actions and seek hidden meaning in their words. We can take a behavior as simple as a delay in unlocking the passenger door to a car as insensitive, or we can feel hurt by something as natural as our partner choosing to spend an evening out with friends. When we sense ourselves becoming mean and critical of our partner, we should take note of how we may be distorting him or her. It’s important to be aware of an internal coach informing us of our many faults as well as those of our partner. Be wary of a critical inner voice telling us to be upset, suspicious and mistrusting. That voice may be saying things like, “Where is he tonight? I can’t believe he didn’t call you. He’s so insensitive.” Or, “All that she ever does is nag at me. Why won’t she just leave me alone?” These thoughts are rarely entirely accurate representations of our partners. Still, the more we react to them, the more we actually provoke these characteristic in our partners. Worse yet, we accomplish the very goal of our critical inner coach; we create distance from our partner by failing to relate to him or her in a way that is sensitive or attuned. In one of my father’s books, “Fear of Intimacy,” he wrote, “The average person is unaware that he or she is living out a negative destiny according to his or her past programming, preserving his or her familiar identity, and, in the process, pushing love away. On an unconscious level, many people sense that if they did not push love away, the whole world, as they have experienced it, would be shattered and they would not know who they were.” Though people claim to seek real love, when they find it, they are often unprepared for the many challenges that ensue. When we find someone who makes us happy, it often shakes us to our core. Our perception of ourselves and our lives is turned on its head, and we are forced to expand our capacity for love and closeness. Feeling another person’s affection for us challenges any defenses we’ve grown accustomed to in the course of our lives. When these defenses are challenged, we tend not only to turn against our partners but to provoke them into acting in ways that fit in with our past. For example, a friend of mine often tells stories of growing up feeling intruded on by his mother. Whether she showered him with excessive praise over small accomplishments or erupted at him when he neglected to study, he rarely felt appropriately seen or sensitively treated by her. After years of dating women who showed similar controlling patterns, my friend fell in love with a woman who he felt respected him as an individual. After a while, however, he noticed himself having trouble making decisions and starting to make out-of-character mistakes like losing things around the house or getting lost on the road. His behavior started to provoke his partner, who found herself both literally and figuratively taking the driver’s seat in their relationship. My friend then also grew annoyed by what he saw as his partner’s new know-it-all attitude. By talking through it, the couple was able to gain a foothold on what was operating under the surface to cause the conflict in the first place. Though his motivation was entirely unconscious, my friend understood how he himself had provoked his partner’s more dominating behaviors. This pattern is shockingly common among couples. People who fear rejection find ways to push their partners away. People who feel aggressive find ways to control their partners, then feel critical for qualities they perceive as weak. We must be careful not to stage the scenarios that we later feel victimized by in our relationship. Manipulative acts like testing our partners with seemingly innocent questions about how we look or what they really think is never appropriate if we are hoping to provoke a certain response or to punish them for their answer. If we are lucky enough to choose someone who inspires real feelings of love or passion, we must be wary of how we can try to alter that person to fit the phantoms of our past. It may be a struggle, but by getting to know ourselves and having compassion, we can show patience with ourselves and with our partners throughout this journey. We can share our stories and know each other as the individuals we truly are. By letting our guard down and revealing our soul, we may even find a soul mate. * * * * * To read more from Dr. Lisa Firestone on relationships, visit “PsychAlive: Alive to Intimacy.”

Continue reading …

Rep. Pat Meehan (PA-7) is the suburban Philadelphia Republican who won the seat Joe Sestak left for his unsuccessful Senate run. Following in the footsteps of Crazy Curt Weldon, who held the seat before Sestak, Meehan is a complete creation of the Delaware County GOP machine and typifies their arrogance. Despite promising not to support the privatization of Medicare, he just voted for Paul Ryan’s voucher plan — and his constituents aren’t too happy with him. (By the way, town halls across America are heating up over this very issue .) First-term Rep. Pat Meehan (R-Pa.) has been the recipient of sharp questions from constituents this week about the House Republican budget and its proposed changes to Medicare. According to CNN, Meehan was pressed at town-hall events about whether the plan from House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) would eliminate Medicare for people in their fifties. “Did you not vote for Paul Ryan’s bill?” one attendee asked Meehan at a town hall on Wednesday. “Well, that is to abolish Medicare and give people some money. It will not be the Medicare that we know.” “I said if you voted to abolish Medicare, how will you explain that to people who are in their fifties who are out of work, that they will have not the Medicare that I have?” the woman asked. Meehan denied that he voted to abolish Medicare. “No ma’am, I did not vote to abolish Medicare,” Meehan said. “And that is factually untrue.” But he stood by his vote for the Ryan plan. “I voted for the Ryan plan, let’s be clear from the outset, to talk about what was in the proposal. Now this is a blueprint,” Meehan said. “What Paul Ryan has put out is a blueprint. A sense of what we’d like to do, a direction that we’d like to go in.” Courtesy of the Meehan Report , here’s the campaign press release Meehan put out for last fall’s election, in which he strongly denied he would do what he just did: “Lentz charged that Meehan supports privatization of Social Security and Medicare, stating ‘Pat…wants to fix the debt by privatizing Medicare, which essentially ends Medicare, [and] privatizing Social Security…that ends Social Security.’ Meehan has repeatedly gone on record opposing any privatization of Social Security and Medicare.” [1] Here’s the video taken when he was running against Democrat Bryan Lentz, and he promised not to vote for Ryan’s voucher program:

Continue reading …

Well, at least he wasn’t complaining about

Continue reading …

Seath Jackson

No Comment
Seath Jackson

Seath Tyler Jackson, 15, Killed By Michael Bargo, 5 Others – Florida – April 2011 15 yo murdered teen’s Facebook posts provide clues 6 arrested after Florida teen shot, his body burned in fire pit Charlie Ely, Suspect in Brutal Seath Jackson Murder, Says She Was … Disturbing details continue to come out as police try to figure out why four teenagers and a 20-year-old brutally… Regina's Blog-Thing:): Seath Tyler Jackson. I feel bad for that family.. . Magically Created byyyyyy Regina Alonso:) at 4:58 PM · Email This BlogThis! Share to Twitter Share to Facebook Share to Google Buzz. Labels: Seath Jackson … What Is Going On?….. The frequency of this stuff is growing … The five were gathered at the house Sunday “when Michael Bargo began to speak of his hatred for the victim Seath Jackson ,” authorities wrote the 16-year-old boy told them. “The conversation then turned into a plan to lure Seath to the … Young Man Shot And Burned To Death By Peers | From A Girl's Point … “ Seath Jackson was hit in the head and shot, but he still tried desperately to flee the home in Summerfield where the attack occurred Sunday, police said. He was shot again and his body was placed in a bathtub, where his knees were … Brutal Teen Violence Raises New Concerns About Bullying « Brutal … The horrifying violence that led teens to attack one of their own, beating 15-year-old Seath Jackson , shooting him, and then burning him in a fire pit has parents wondering about the demons their own children face, and how it could put … MandaIsLove says: RT @whattheashley : RIP Seath Jackson .

Continue reading …
International Labor Movement is Overridding U.S. Sovereignty

According to The Blaze : “UNION BOSSES & WHITE HOUSE ADVISORS BOB PARK & RICH TRUMKA ADMIT THEY ARE OVERRIDING US LAW & SOVEREIGNTY WITH THE INTERNATIONAL LABOR MOVEMENT.” . Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : P/Oed Patriot Discovery Date : 22/04/2011 15:23 Number of articles : 5

Continue reading …
International Labor Movement is Overridding U.S. Sovereignty

According to The Blaze : “UNION BOSSES & WHITE HOUSE ADVISORS BOB PARK & RICH TRUMKA ADMIT THEY ARE OVERRIDING US LAW & SOVEREIGNTY WITH THE INTERNATIONAL LABOR MOVEMENT.” . Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : P/Oed Patriot Discovery Date : 22/04/2011 15:23 Number of articles : 5

Continue reading …
International Labor Movement is Overridding U.S. Sovereignty

According to The Blaze : “UNION BOSSES & WHITE HOUSE ADVISORS BOB PARK & RICH TRUMKA ADMIT THEY ARE OVERRIDING US LAW & SOVEREIGNTY WITH THE INTERNATIONAL LABOR MOVEMENT.” . Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : P/Oed Patriot Discovery Date : 22/04/2011 15:23 Number of articles : 5

Continue reading …
International Labor Movement is Overridding U.S. Sovereignty

According to The Blaze : “UNION BOSSES & WHITE HOUSE ADVISORS BOB PARK & RICH TRUMKA ADMIT THEY ARE OVERRIDING US LAW & SOVEREIGNTY WITH THE INTERNATIONAL LABOR MOVEMENT.” . Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : P/Oed Patriot Discovery Date : 22/04/2011 15:23 Number of articles : 5

Continue reading …

So pumping millions of gallons of carcinogenic liquid into the earth in order to get out natural gas deposits is not looking like such a sustainable energy policy. Thank God here in Pennsylvania, our new GOP Gov. Tom Corbett, an energy-industry shill , quickly moved to eliminate (or stop enforcing) the safeguards our previous Democratic administration put in place. Who cares what it might do to the drinking water in the New York-Philadelphia-New Jersey watershed? Let them drink bottled water, damn it! Thousands of gallons of fracking fluid have spilled following an accident at a natural gas well in Pennsylvania, WNEP reports .The Chesapeake Energy well in Bradford County lost control late Tuesday night. From WNEP : The well blew near the surface, spilling thousands and thousands of gallons of frack fluid over containment walls, through fields, personal property and farms, even where cattle continue to graze. Francis Roupp, deputy director of the county emergency management agency, told AP that there were no injuries, and that although fluids have reached a small stream, “no adverse effects” have been reported. Roupp suggests a cracked well casing could be the culprit behind the fracking spill , but that certain details won’t be known until the situation is under control. Pennlive.com reports that seven families have been evacuated as a result of the spill. The chemicals used in fracking fluids have been a contentious subject, as many energy companies have long guarded them as a “trade secret.” A recent report released by three House Democrats says that millions of gallons of potentially hazardous chemicals and known carcinogens, such as methanol, have been injected into wells across the country by energy companies using the controversial fracking method.

Continue reading …
Japan suffering leaves pope stumped

The pope answers questions on Italian TV, but cannot explain the devastation caused by the tsunami Pope Benedict ventured where no pope has gone before on Friday when he answered questions on an Italian television programme – and was stumped by the first. A Japanese girl asked the pope, who, she said, “speaks with God”, why she was having to suffer so much as a result of the earthquake and tsunami that had struck her country. “I am very frightened because the house where I felt safe really shook a lot and many children my age have died. I cannot go to play in the park. I want to know: why do I have to be so afraid? Why do children have to be so sad?” said seven-year-old Elena. Benedict admitted: “I also have the same questions: why is it this way? Why do you have to suffer so much while others live in ease? “And we do not have the answers, but we know that Jesus suffered as you do, an innocent, and that the true God who is revealed in Jesus is by your side.” Whether Elena was satisfied with that answer was unclear. But the studio audience gave the pope a hearty round of applause. The Japanese girl’s question was one of seven fielded by Benedict in an unprecedented exercise. His predecessor, John Paul II, once made a surprise call to a television programme on the 20th anniversary of his papacy. And Benedict himself broke new ground with a Thought for the Day broadcast by BBC Radio 4 last Christmas Eve. But no pope has ever before submitted himself to questioning on television, or indeed radio, in the way Benedict did for a special Good Friday programme on the first channel of the state-owned RAI network. The presenter, Rosario Carello, initially addressed the pope as “holy father” and told him his presence on the programme “fills us with joy”. But thereafter, the reverential tone Italian broadcasters usually employ for papal occasions was wholly lacking. The atmosphere was briskly professional as the show cut between the pope’s answers – pre-recorded in his study in the Vatican – and comments from a panel of three studio guests who also replied to other questions from viewers. The pope’s fellow guests added to the air of informality: one was a poet and columnist in an open-necked shirt; another, the founder of a charity for young runaways who sported a leather jacket and spiky hair. The usually retiring Benedict’s participation was the latest sign of an apparently growing willingness to co-operate with the media. Carello told viewers the pope had initially agreed to answer only three questions, but so many were submitted that the programme-makers asked – and Benedict agreed – that the number be doubled. Then, he said, they received a question from a Muslim woman in the Ivory Coast that was so topical and moving that they were loth not to include it. So the number was raised to seven. Bintu, who greeted the pope in Arabic, asked him for his advice on how to put an end to the violence in her country. Benedict said he was “saddened that I can do so little”, but said he had asked a senior Vatican official to try to mediate. Most of the other questions were about issues of Catholic faith, including one from an Italian woman who wanted to know if her son, who had been in a vegetative coma for two years, still had a soul. “Certainly,” the pope replied. He urged her to keep up her vigil at his side, saying that her “presence enters into the depths of that hidden soul”. Pope Benedict XVI Italy Japan disaster Television Japan Religion Catholicism Christianity Europe John Hooper guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …