Home » Posts tagged with » chris matthews (Page 3)

Those who admire Ronald Reagan may want to steer clear of tonight's HBO documentary on the former president, if that film's director's comments, on Monday's Hardball, are an indication of how slanted the project will be, as he trashed many of Reagan's historic accomplishments. From reinvigorating the economy to his staunch anti-communist stance, Eugene Jarecki, who also wrote the film, was egged on by MSNBC host Chris Matthews to deny the 40th president many of his legacies as he charged Reagan's economic policies “hurt the very people he sought…to most

Continue reading …
Matthews Bashes Bush for Holding Saudi King’s Hand in 2005, Ignores Obama’s Bow to Same Man in 2009

In a classic example of liberal media bias, Chris Matthews on Friday bashed former President George W. Bush for holding Prince Abdullah of Saudia Arabia's hand when he visited the Crawford ranch back in 2005. After mentioning how “the bowing and scraping” involved in the “paramount task” of presidents honoring Arab leaders has sometimes “been nearly comical,” the host of the syndicated program bearing his name completely ignored President Barack Obama's deep bow to the very same man less than two years ago (video follows with transcript and commentary): CHRIS MATTHEWS, HOST: I think we do pay attention. I want to give you an example of this as we go to break. Honoring Arab leaders has of course been a paramount task for presidents, but sometimes the bowing and scraping has been nearly comical at least to American ears and eyes. ♪♪ See the pyramids along the Nile ♪♪ Here’s our all-time favorite image, President George W. Bush down in Crawford, his ranch in 2005, just six years ago, tiptoeing through those Texas blue bonnets with Prince Abdullah of Saudi Arabia. They were meeting about a current oil crisis and Bush was trying to get the Saudis to increase production. ♪♪ You belong to me ♪♪ MATTHEWS: (Laughing) Well, Jon Stewart, of course, had this take back then. (BEGIN VIDEOTAPE) JON STEWART: Earlier this week Bush met with a key player on the world energy scene. Prince Abdullah of Saudi Arabia. The President greeted him with a kiss on both cheeks and then led him by the hand into his ranch. That is unacceptable on my part. Two easy to joke about the two of them kissing and holding hands. The truth is both of those are Saudi customs indicating friendship and trust. If you heard what they were talking about, believe me, you’d hardly call them sissies. GEORGE W. BUSH: All of these are blue bonnets. This is our state flower. PRINCE ABDULLAH: Beautiful! It’s just gorgeous. STEWART: Added Prince Abdullah, I mean GORGEOUS! He added, “You know, we used to have fields of blue bonnets in Saudi Arabia. Then we beheaded them in a soccer stadium.” (END VIDEOTAPE) MATTHEWS: Message – we care. I guess Matthews forgot this from April 2009: Matthews could have even used Stewart again to drive home the point, for the “Daily Show” host had a lot to say about Obama's bow at the time: I guess that would have been too much like journalism for a man that believes “Hardball” is “absolutely nonpartisan.”

Continue reading …
Before Obama Was Elected, Chris Matthews Gushed Over the ‘Genius’ Who Is a ‘Miraculous Gift’

Chris Matthews, who famously fawned Over Barack Obama for creating a ” thrill ” up his leg, appeared smitten with the politician long before he reached the White House. In his book, Life's a Campaign , the MSNBC anchor enthused, “In 2007, a new-generation candidate arrived on the national stage, declaring his presidential candidacy and preaching the gospel of good news.” The 2007 book recounted Matthews' reaction to Obama's 2004 speech at the Democratic convention. On page 52, the author extolled, “There, in Boston's FleetCenter, he delivered what might have been the most inspiring speech many Americans listening that evening had ever heard.” Matthews continued, ” Obama, at that moment not elected to the U.S. Senate, was offering a miraculous gift with those words .” Foreshadowing the praise he would heap on President Obama, the Hardball host gushed, “With thoughtful eloquence, Obama was marrying the immigrant story to the African American legacy not simply by his genes, but by his genius.” “No wonder the country's youth turned to him as their hope as well as their hero,” the anchor concluded. During live coverage of the 2004 Democratic convention, Matthews offered an early version of his famous “thrill” line, saying Obama gave him a ” chill in my…legs .” Clips of both the “thrill” and the “chill” can be found below:

Continue reading …
Brent Bozell Excoriates Chris Matthews on ‘Fox & Friends’ for Comparing Muslim Brotherhood to Tea Party

“He's shameless, isn't he?” asked FNC's Steve Doocy, co-host of “Fox & Friends, about MSNBC anchor Chris Matthews, who recently compared the Muslim Brotherhood to the Tea Party. “Chris Matthews is not a journalist,” replied MRC President Brent Bozell. “He's a parody of himself.” On the February 4 “Fox & Friends,” the NewsBusters publisher acknowledged that while most of the coverage surrounding the crisis in Egypt has been relatively “fair and honest,” there have been a few notable “blips.” [Video embedded after the page break.] The most glaring exception was delivered by Matthews on Tuesday: “So the Muslim Brotherhood has a parallel role here with the Tea Party. They're the ones that keep you honest and decide whether you've stayed too long.” After playing the clip, Bozell retorted, “If a meteor came out of the heavens and hit New York City, [Matthews] would blame the Tea Party.” Bozell also criticized analysts at MSNBC and CNN for downplaying the fundamentalist views of the Muslim Brotherhood. “These are useful idiots,” he quipped. –Alex Fitzsimmons is a News Analysis intern at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow him on Twitter.

Continue reading …

Overall the coverage of the ongoing protests against Hosni Mubarak in Egypt has been pretty good, but it's when journalists get around to offering their analysis that bias has crept in, NewsBusters publisher Brent Bozell told Fox News's Steve Doocy on the February 4 “Fox & Friends.” Case in point, MSNBC's Chris Matthews comparing the Muslim Brotherhood with the Tea Party movement. “Mr. Bozell, he's shameless, isn't he?” Doocy asked. Matthews is a pathetic parody of himself at this point, Bozell noted, arguing that the former Jimmy Carter staffer uses every opportunity he can to trash conservatives from his perch at MSNBC. Bozell also reacted to journalists like NBC's Richard Engel benignly painting the Muslim Brotherhood as “nice people.” “This is a group that supports Osama bin Laden. This is a group that is agitating for Egypt to go to war next month with Israel,” Bozell noted. Journalists who fail to report their radical inclinations are “useful idiots,” the Media Research Center founder argued.

Continue reading …
Chris Matthews Rips Obama’s Handling of Egypt Crisis: ‘I Feel Ashamed As an American’

MSNBC anchor Chris Matthews appeared on Morning Joe, Friday, to slam President Obama's handling of the escalating crisis in Egypt, saying it made him ” ashamed as an American .” Matthews, who famously declared Obama gave him a “thrill” up his leg, excoriated what he perceived to be the President's disloyalty to Egypt's leader, Hosni Mubarak. The Hardball host berated, ” And Barack Obama, as much I support him in many ways, there is a transitional quality to the guy that is chilling.” He added, “I believe in relationships…You treat your friends a certain way. You're loyal to them.” Matthews has previously lauded the authoritarian Mubarak.. Pointing out Mubarak's stand against Hezbollah and other extremist elements in the region, the anchor on January 31 wondered, “How can you say he'll easily be replaced? This guy's the George Washington of peace over there.” [See video below.] Deriding immediate calls for Mubarak to step down, Matthews lamented, “Character and planning…I feel shame about this. I feel ashamed as an American, the way we're doing this. I know he has to change. I know we're for democracy, but the way we've handled it is not the way a friend handles a matter.” Matthews even attacked Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's performance: “I watched Secretary Clinton today. I don't get anything. I don't see anything other than two and two are four. I keep waiting for five. Show me you've done your jobs over there.” A transcript of his answer to Joe Scarborough's question, which aired at 8:22am EST, follows: JOE SCARBOROUGH: Chris, a statement yesterday from Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, real concern among Arab states, if this is how we treat our ally of 30 years and I know it's tough to bring these facts up to people who want to call for his immediate lynching, but if we treat an ally of 30 years this way, demanding that he leaves quote “now,” Saudi Arabia, UAE, Jordan, are other allies in the region start questioning America's character [sic]? CHRIS MATTHEWS: Well, I think that's the great word, Joe. It's character. Our national character. We do is have a character. And Americans think about ourselves as the good guys and being good friends and loyal. And these are values that mean a lot to us as people. You don't walk down the street and watch your friend get gunned down and not do anything about it. We're not Kitty Genovese here. We're not a situation in New York or something when somebody gets mugged and we watch it happen. Was he our friend for 30 years? Are we denying that? I remember, Joe, when he came to one of those afternoon events they had in the House Foreign Affairs committee back in 1981 after Sadat had been assassinated. And, of course, we Americans loved Sadat. There was a great emotion towards him because of what he had done for peace and his courage. And we just loved his dignity and his personality. And Along came Mubarak, this strong personality. We thought things might come apart over there and he held everything together. He was strong. I was with Tip O'Neil that day and I walked aback from that meeting with him and I said, “He's a strong guy.” And we were just chatting about what an impressive figure he was and we've been with him for 30 years. And now we're saying, it's time for the gate. Well, we should have known this. My second point of view about this, it's friendship. He's 83 in May. He's getting old. We should have prepared this 10, 20 years ago. In friendship, where was the State Department? Don't we have hundreds of people sitting over there in Foggy Bottom with no other job except to know what's going on in Egypt, with no other job, but to know the culture and politics in that country and to understand who the potential leaders and factions that might off set the Muslim Brotherhood? What are they doing? I watched Secretary Clinton today . I don't get anything. I don't see anything other than two and two are four . I keep waiting for five. Show me you've done your jobs over there . And I just wish, in our friendship, we should have been smart and I think we don't have a plan B. I mean, the guy's almost 83. His plan was Gamal]. I was talking to Secretary Powell while ago. I hope it wasn't off the record, because he said it rather clearly to me. I said, “What do you think of Mubarak?” He said, “He's like every other leader in the world there. All they think about is primogeniture.” They want their oldest kid to be their successor, whether it's Gadaffi or Bashar Assad. They call themselves Baathist, monarchist, whatever, Islamists. It all comes down to the same thing. They want their oldest kid to replace them. And what was the plan for transition for our friend? Did we ever talk to him about it? Did we talk about it, encourage him? That's my view. Character and planning. And I don't see- I feel shame about this. I feel ashamed as an American, the way we're doing this. I know he has to change. I know we're for democracy, but the way we've handled it is not the way a friend handles a matter. We're not handling as Americans should handle a matter like this. I don't feel right about it. And Barack Obama, as much I support him in many ways, there is a transitional quality to the guy that is chilling. I believe in relationships. I think we all do. Relationship politics is what we were brought up with in this country. You treat your friends a certain way. You're loyal to them. And when they're wrong, you try to be with them. You try and stick with them. As the great old line was, “I don't need you when I'm right.” You've got to help out people when they're in trouble and all I'm seeing is transaction. Who we going to get the next deal with? And, by the way, we don't have a plan for the next deal, so we're not even good at transactions, let alone relationships. What are we good at here? That's what I keep asking. What have we done as leaders and friends? Nothing except watch. MIKA BRZEZINSKI: Wow! — Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center. Click here to follow him on Twitter .

Continue reading …
Time’s Halperin Raves: Obama Has Level of ‘Sophistication and Skill’ That Not One Republican Can Duplicate

It's rare when Chris Matthews is outdone in his praise of Barack Obama but Time's Mark Halperin, on Thursday's Hardball, managed to top the MSNBC host as he delivered a rave review of Barack Obama's performance at the National Prayer Breakfast. After playing a clip of the speech, Matthews merely offered a “That's pretty good” but the Game Change co-author did him one better, going as far to warn any GOP candidate considering a presidential run in 2012 to study the address because it had “a level of sophistication and skill that not one Republican on the field right now can duplicate.” (video, audio and transcript after the jump) (MP3 audio) The following exchange was aired on the February 3 edition of MSNBC's Hardball: (Begin clip) BARACK OBAMA: And let me tell you, these past two years, they have deepened my faith. The presidency has a funny way of making a person feel the need to pray. Abe Lincoln said, as many of may know, “I have been driven to my knees many times by the overwhelming conviction that I had no place else to go. (End clip) CHRIS MATTHEWS: That's pretty good. Anyway we're back. That was President Obama today at the National Prayer Breakfast, he's talking about his faith. He's also not shying away from a philosophical fight about what government can do to help people, as some Republicans think about running against him. Is President Obama already running himself? Is he off and running? We're joined right now by MSNBC's political analyst Richard Wolffe and Tim magazine's Mark Halperin. Gentlemen, it's great to have both of you. Mark, of course, is an MSNBC political analyst. I want to start with Rich and then go to Mark. Just, I'm – you guys are the experts. What's up here? RICHARD WOLFFE: Well about this time a year, every year, he does a personal speech. A lot of this stuff is personal He goes to churches and maybe the Sunday before Martin Luther King Day. Obviously this was a prayer breakfast, but he's showing he's fluent in the language of faith. And he's showing that there is some kind of underlying value philosophy through his whole political career. He talked about civil rights, importance of religion there and how inspirational that was for him. But this is about him doing what he finds a very reluctant thing, which is to go personal and public. MATTHEWS: Well what do you think? Do you think we should have a president explain his religion to people? Should we have a religious test? WOLFFE: That's what, that's what people expect. No, that's what people expect. MATTHEWS: Okay let me go to Mark. Are you comfortable with it? Where a president has to, defensively or offensively, talk about what he believes in terms of religion? MARK HALPERIN: If it's what he believes in and that's what the President does. Anyone who's thinking of running for president against this guy should go watch that speech. It was more than just about faith. As Richard said, it was his philosophy, it was brilliant performance. This guy has game. If you want to add, make a long list – what are all the reasons Barack Obama is favored for being re-elected? Forget the Electoral College, forget the unemployment rate and earnings and all that. That performance has a level of sophistication and skill that not one Republican on the field right now can duplicate. —Geoffrey Dickens is the Senior News Analyst at the Media Research Center. You can follow him on Twitter here

Continue reading …
Chris Matthews Compares Tea Party to the Muslim Brotherhood

In just one segment, on Tuesday's Hardball, host Chris Matthews managed to hypocritically use violent “gun play” language, attack Michele Bachmann and Sarah Palin and even

Continue reading …
Palin and Bachmann Nitpicker Chris Matthews Says Panama Canal Is In Egypt

As NewsBusters has been reporting almost ad nauseam, Chris Matthews spent much of last week mercilessly lambasting Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann with cherry-picked and distorted quotes far afield of their intended meaning. On Friday, the “Hardball” host got a touch of instant karma when he said the Panama Canal is in Egypt (video follows with transcript and commentary): CHRIS MATTHEWS, HOST: You know, the great thing about Egypt is it’s its own country. It was always there before there was an America or Britain or anything, there has been an Egypt. It’s like China. It’s a real country. It wasn’t just carved off the map or out of the map by the Europeans, like so many African and third world countries have. It’s got a real rooted history. It’s not just an Arab country. It was a country long before it was an Arab country — long before Islam, there was an Egypt. Will it see itself in this moment of chaos as joining a greater Islamic world or is holding to its national identity? AMB. MARC GINSBERG, FMR. U.S. AMBASSADOR TO MOROCCO (via telephone)GINSBERG: There’s no doubt that the Egyptians view themselves as the center of culture in the Arab and the Muslim world and the center of Islamic learning. I studied there. I used to take classes at the al-Azhar University, which is considered to be the pre-eminent Islamic institution in the Muslim world, Chris. MATTHEWS: Right. GINSBERG: And the fact is that there’s enormous pride going back to the history of the pharaohs. The Egyptians embrace their ancient culture. But they’re very dissatisfied with their current regime. MATTHEWS: Well, let me ask you about the prospects we’re looking at as an American. We’re looking at the map of the world right now and where Egypt sits in the world. It’s so strategically located. It has, of course, the Nile River. It has, of course, the Panama Canal. Someone must have spoken in Matthews’ earplug, for he corrected himself moments later: MATTHEWS: It is the largest and only true partner even if it’s a cold peace with Israel. It is, in fact, the key to whatever Middle East peace we’re able to arrange in our lifetime. It always tends to support the moderate forces in – the Suez Canal. It has always supported the moderate forces in that region. In fairness, I know full well that Matthews is aware of what countries these respective canals reside in. This was a mistake. People make them. The problem is that folks like Matthews, who so desperately hate Palin and Bachmann, are hanging on their every utterance looking to pounce on anything that can be twisted and misconstrued to embarrass and defame these conservative women. As we demonstrated last week, this is even when the comments aren’t nearly as out of line as people like Matthews claim. Contrary to the prevailing liberal meme, Bachmann did not state last Saturday that the Founding Fathers ended slavery before the Emancipation Proclamation and the Civil War. Unlike what Matthews reported Thursday, Palin did not say the Russians beat us in the Space Race. Even the perilously liberal Tommy Christopher admitted as much Saturday. Compounding matters further is folks like Matthews give Democrats a pass when they commit faux pas. Consider all the gaffes and blunders made by candidates Barack Obama and Joe Biden that went completely uncovered during the 2008 campaign. What Americans have painfully learned in recent years is that when people on the Left err, so-called journalists consider them only human. But when conservatives are caught even coming close to making a slip of the tongue, they’re unfit for office. With this in mind, Matthews better be darned careful, for if he’s going to demand perfection from conservatives, we’re going to demand it of him. What's good for conservative geese should be good for liberal gander. (H/T NB reader Miles Taylor)

Continue reading …
Chris Matthews Blames Egypt Riots on George W. Bush and Iraq War

It's a metaphysical certitude that whenever anything happens in the Middle East, the media will quickly blame former President George W. Bush and the war in Iraq. Not missing the opportunity to do so, Chris Matthews began the 5PM installment of “Hardball” Friday connecting the riots in Egypt to a man that has been out of office for two years (video follows with transcript and commentary): CHRIS MATTHEWS, HOST: Trouble on the Nile. Let`s play HARDBALL. Good evening. I`m Chris Matthews in Washington. Leading off tonight: Unrest in Egypt. Proving the Iraq war wasn`t needed, these protests in Egypt, as well as in Yemen and Tunisia, are all aimed at dictators supported by the U.S. The demonstrations have not yet turned anti-American, but they could. These are the events the Bush administration hoped to encourage by lying about weapons of mass destruction and invading Iraq. A live report from Richard Engel at the scene coming up. And we`ll stay on this story throughout the hour as events warrant. Riots and a potential revolution in Egypt prove the Iraq war wasn't needed? How does one come to that conclusion? Who on Matthews' staff decided that the perfect way to lead off Friday's program was by linking the unrest in Egypt to Bush and Iraq? Didn't these folks learn anything from their rush to judgment over this month's shootings in Tucson? This seems especially important as Matthews' guest through much of the program – NBC's Richard Engel reporting from Cairo – didn't say anything about these riots being in any way related to Iraq, anti-Americanism, or Bush. From what Engel could tell, this is all about the high poverty and unemployment rates in Egypt along with continued disgust with the corruption of the government. Matthews himself said, “The demonstrations have not yet turned anti-American.” So why suggest they are or will? Are viewers to believe that if Saddam Hussein was still in power in Iraq, folks in Egypt would be happy with the corruption in their country as well as the high unemployment and poverty? Beyond this, Egypt is and has been a strong ally of the United States and plays a pivotal role in keeping peace in the region as a result of its treaty with Israel. Why would Bush or any President want to see a revolution in this country that could tremendously destabilize this entire part of the world sending oil prices to all-time highs and undermining the economy? As it turned out, Matthews never got to answer such a question or elaborate on his absurd opening as breaking events out of Egypt, including an address by President Hosni Mubarak, dominated the entire hour. But one has to wonder what if anything the folks at MSNBC learned from their rush to judgment when they incorrectly blamed the Tucson shootings on conservatives. Are these people capable of toning down their own rhetoric and avoiding jumping the accusation shark every time news breaks, or is advancing their agenda the only thing that matters and all this civility talk was just a smokescreen to silence the Right? Maybe more importantly, has Matthews foreshadowed what we should expect from so-called journalists in the coming days and that despite all evidence to the contrary, whatever happens in Egypt is going to be blamed on Bush? Stay tuned.

Continue reading …