Home » Posts tagged with » breaking news (Page 962)
No Time for ‘Tirement’

By Ellen Goodman In little over a century, Americans have gone from a life expectancy of 47 to one of 78. By 2025 there will be 66 million Americans over 65. The decisions that we make individually and collectively about how to spend this gift of time will reshape the country. Related Entries December 31, 2010 War Is Toxic December 31, 2010 Haiti’s Cholera Death Toll Rising

Continue reading …

Fake news by Andy Borowitz By Andy Borowitz The Rev. Pat Robertson sparked controversy in Sunday’s broadcast of his “700 Club” program when he claimed that God created the blizzard currently battering the Northeast “to punish Americans who were planning to drive to do something gay.” Related Entries December 31, 2010 War Is Toxic December 31, 2010 Haiti’s Cholera Death Toll Rising

Continue reading …

From the New York Times on Thursday, in an item put together with the help of a half-dozen Times reporters (“Inaction and Delays by New York as Storm Bore Down”; bold is mine): … Harry Nespoli, president of the Uniformed Sanitationmen’s Association, said the problems late Sunday ( during the initial stages of the Northeast's post-Christmas snowstorm — Ed. ) underscored how the city could not rely on outside contractors to help with snow removal and other jobs in such storms, particularly during a holiday weekend.

Continue reading …
George Will: Public Employees’ Unions ‘Biggest Issue In The Country.’ Uh, Right, George.

Click here to view this media I started the day with this story in the Times (how great that the corporate media so faithfully completes their assigned propaganda!), and because it made me so grumpy, was happy to turn on This Week With Christiane Amanpour and see Donna Brazile knock back George Will’s Very Serious Take on public employees’ unions. Would that our president were as good at standing up for working people! WILL: There is one national resonance from this, however. In New York City, the issue is tangled up with the question, and it’s an open question, whether the public employees union to make a job action point sabotaged street collection. I believe — and this is entirely tangled up with the state bankruptcy — that the issue of public employees and their dominance of blue states is going to be the biggest issue in this country for the next several years. BRAZILE: No, they’re the scapegoat, George. I mean, when you start cutting state budgets and city budgets, and you start cutting snowplows, and you start cutting the amount of salt that you have stored, that has a real impact on people’s lives. And, you know, the one thing — in terms of Brooklyn and some of the — you know, the other boroughs — they didn’t get snowplowed for two, three days, and so they were upset when Mayor Bloomberg went out and said, “Hey, everything is fine.” And they’re like, we have kids who are — who need hospital treatment, but they can’t — the ambulance cannot get there. George, I know that’s the new baby on — on the wish list, to cut all of these budgets, but when they start cutting these state budgets, people are going to feel it. This, in a nutshell, is the problem with the how Democrats and Republicans govern. It sounds fiscally responsible to cut costs, to shrink the size of the government when speaking in the abstract. But when something happens, Americans WANT to rely on the government to take care of these necessities. Public employees didn’t cause the “Snowpocalypse”. But the constant drumming to cut costs to the bare bones (and sometimes even whittle those bones down further) shows you the danger of not having the resources when you need it.

Continue reading …
Magnitude-7.1 Quake Shakes Southern Chile

Chilean officials and the US Geological Survey say a magnitude-7.1 quake has shaken southern Chile, sending hundreds fleeing for higher ground for fear that it would generate a tsunami. (Jan. 3)

Continue reading …
IDF: Palestinian killed at checkpoint was unarmed

Soldier who fired at Palestinian man says he acted suspiciously, but inquiry into incident yields uncertainty as army discovers two other soldiers fired despite not being in danger. ‘We must take all measures to avoid pulling trigger,’ IDF source says

Continue reading …
Lindsey Graham: Don’t Allow Debt Ceiling to Be Raised Without Cuts and Means Testing for Social Security

Click here to view this media Looks like Lindsey Graham is continuing to pander to the extreme right wing of his base, which isn’t too happy with him right now , with this rhetoric. Graham wants to hold raising the debt ceiling hostage even though he admits here that it would not be a good thing to have the United States default on our Treasury obligations. But he wants to use this “opportunity” to raise the retirement age and means test Social Security and Medicare Part D, or in other words, turn them into welfare systems. And as I’ve said before, we all know what Republicans think of welfare. This is nothing more than using the debt ceiling as an excuse to destroy Social Security and our social safety nets in America. Although Graham later admitted that Republicans really didn’t want to shut down the government, he apparently is more than willing to play political games with our entire economy in order to get their last chunk of flesh from the working class. GREGORY: Let me break a few of those things down because it’s important, the level of detail. Let me start with this. You talk about the budget. You talk about spending. How will you vote on the debt ceiling? Will you vote to raise it which is a vote that will come up in relatively short order? GRAHAM: Well to not raise the debt ceiling could be a default of the United States on bond and treasury obligations. That would be very bad for the position of the United States in the world at large but this is an opportunity to make sure that government is changing its spending ways. I will not vote for the debt ceiling increase until I see a plan in place that will deal with our long term debt obligations starting with Social Security, a real bipartisan effort to make sure that Social Security stays solvent, adjusting the age, looking at means tests for benefits. On the spending side I’m not going to vote for a debt ceiling increase unless we go back to 2008 spending levels, cutting discretionary spending… GREGORY: Let me stop you right there Senator. That’s a big condition just on Social Security alone. GRAHAM: Do you think Republicans are prepared to follow you in two things you said; raise the retirement age and means test benefits for older Americans? GRAHAM: I would suggest that if we’re serious about taking America in a new direction and you’re not putting entitlement reform on the table, you’ve missed a great opportunity to change the course of America’s future. And the last election was about change, change that really will make us something other than Greece. I think Pat Toomey, Rand Paul and the other candidates that are new to the Congress that said during the campaign, everything’s on the table when it comes to making America fiscally sound. Let’s see if we can find bipartisan reforms in Social Security before we raise the debt limit. GREGORY: Do you think Sen. McConnell, the leader of the Republicans is going to go along with that? GRAHAM: I hope so. I know that Speaker Boehner is going to produce spending limitation bills every day, but the question for the Republican Party, for the tea party and the Democratic Party, beyond discretionary spending are we willing to look at the debt commission suggestions on entitlement reform and begin to enact those reforms before it’s too late. I hope that this new Congress will do something the other Congresses have never done and that is seriously look at entitlement reform by adjusting the age and means testing benefits, including Medicare Part D. Obama health care needs to be repealed and replaced but the Republican Party created Medicare Part D, a prescription drug entitlement that’s already gotten out of control. I hope we’ll put that on the table for reform. GREGORY: Would you vote to actually scrap that, to take it away? GRAHAM: I would vote to means test it. I would vote to make sure that people with my income level and your income level don’t get their benefit… their prescription drug bill paid by the federal government because we can’t afford it. I would vote to make sure that someone in my income level would have their Social Security benefits renegotiated if they’re under 55, not in a Draconian way but changes we can make now for people 55 and under to avoid a fiscal collapse that’s surely coming if we do nothing. The president said in his speech he wants to work with us. This is a good opportunity to find common ground; entitlement reforms starting with Social Security. Of course, Graham and the rest of the pearl-clutching Republican Party had no problem doubling the national debt under President Bush and raising the debt ceiling seven times , as Jon Perr points out.

Continue reading …

Parag Khanna in a TED lecture, July 2009 I’ve been thinking a lot about history lately. There’s something oddly reassuring about finding patterns in history, if only to reassure myself that the passage of time is cyclical and that we will eventually cycle into a new phase. I’m not the only one whose been thinking this way, and geo-political scholar Parag Khanna is seeing parallels that I admit I don’t necessarily agree with, but I think are thought-provoking: Imagine a world with a strong China reshaping Asia; India confidently extending its reach from Africa to Indonesia; Islam spreading its influence; a Europe replete with crises of legitimacy; sovereign city-states holding wealth and driving innovation; and private mercenary armies, religious radicals and humanitarian bodies playing by their own rules as they compete for hearts, minds and wallets. It sounds familiar today. But it was just as true slightly less than a millennium ago at the height of the Middle Ages. In recent years it has become conventional wisdom that the post-cold-war world will see rising powers such as China and Brazil create what international relations experts call a “multi-polar” order. Yet for the next 10 or 20 years, it is not at all clear that the future many imagine will come to pass – namely that the relative US decline will continue, Europe will muddle along, China and India will grow ever stronger, and other straight-line projections. In fact, the world we are moving into in 2011 is one not just with many more prominent nations, but one with numerous centres of power in other ways. It is, in short, a neo-medieval world. The 21st century will resemble nothing more than the 12th century. You have to go back a thousand years to find a time when the world was genuinely western and eastern at the same time. Then, China’s Song dynasty presided over the world’s largest cities, mastered gunpowder and printed paper money. At around the same time India’s Chola empire ruled the seas to Indonesia, and the Abbasid caliphate dominated from Africa to Persia. Byzantium swayed and lulled in weakness both due to and despite its vastness. Only in Europe is this medieval landscape viewed negatively. This was a truly multi-polar world. Both ends of Eurasia and the powers in between called their own shots, just as in our own time China, India and the Arab/Islamic community increasingly do as well. There is another reason why the metaphor is apt. In medieval times, the Crusades, and the Silk Road, linked Eurasia in the first global trading system – just as the globalised routes of trade are doing today. Certainly, there’s a point to be made in the suspicions and outright rejection of science by people who really don’t belong in leadership positions. Global power is also very decentralized–look at the one remaining alleged “superpower” deeply in debt to China. In lieu of trade routes, we have American corporations outsourcing labor–”flattening” the market, as it were. The metaphor is far from perfect but interesting. Cheryl Rofer, who is very into Medieval history takes a very literal look at Khanna’s parallels and takes issue with them . I’m still trying to figure out what Khanna is trying to say. He’s got a potpourri of observations but doesn’t put them together into anything coherent. When people say that something is medieval, in general, it’s not a compliment and refers to “the dark ages” and a lack of enlightenment, which, by some accounts, came later. He’s also got his centuries mixed up. If he’s talking about Marco Polo and Ibn Battuta, that’s the thirteenth century into the fourteenth. And he leaves a lot out, like how intertwined governance and religion were and that states as we know them were just developing. I’ll address just a few of his points. “Numerous centers of power.” Well, okay, but Matt Eckel points out that the physical and communication separation was much greater in the thirteenth century than it is now. Plus one of those centers today spends more on defense than all the rest combined. The Crusades were an attempt to globalize war, and the Mongols were pretty good at that sort of thing too. Economically, there was some trade, but nothing like the financial globalization we have today. So what do you think? Are we living through the 21st century version of the Dark Ages?

Continue reading …
Raw Video: Australia Floodwaters Keep Rising

Residents of the city of Rockhampton, in the Australian state of Queensland, faced a nervous wait on Sunday as floodwaters continue to rise. (January 2)

Continue reading …
Ashkelon rally targets Arabs who ‘seduce girls’

City councilman leading protest says he is not racist. ‘Seducing teenage girls is a crime,’ he says

Continue reading …