NewsBreakingOnline

Click here to view this media Here’s Elisabeth Hasselbeck last night on Sean Hannity’s Fox News show, making excuses for Sarah Palin and her inexcusable “crosshairs” ads after the shooting of Gabrielle Giffords, one of the ad’s targets: HANNITY: You know, I fear we are getting to the point, you can’t say anything — you can’t say war room, you can’t say targeting. You can’t, you know, say, we are going to put a bull’s-eye on a map. HASSELBECK: Yes we can say that. And I will use yes we can. And this is why I believe and I think the more that we link and say, we cannot say anything — I mean, look, I grew up in a family that was based on speak kind words as much as possible and if you don’t, apologize. Work hard and operate with integrity. That goes without saying. I think most civil people in the United States of America agree that you shouldn’t go outside of those boundaries. Right now to even say that we have to curb what we’re saying only links any rhetoric to what happened in Tucson. There’s no link. We haven’t found a link. There’s no evidence that man even watched cable news. That he heard Sarah Palin say anything or saw the map with crosshairs. None. So the more that this conversation continues, in my opinion, it is a weak link that is trying to be strengthened by the left to Sarah and this man again. And here’s Hasselbeck last March, when she agreed with her colleagues at The View that the ads were outrageous and dangerous: Click here to view this media “This hasn’t been a great week in terms of, I think, the Constitution and where it says that you’re supposed to, you know, everybody is, has a mandate to have insurance. But I think the way some Republicans are handling this is nothing more than purely despicable,” Hasselbeck said. “The names that are next to and being highlighted by those crosshairs — I think it’s an abuse of the Second Amendment. I also feel as though every single person on here is a mother, a father, a friend, a brother, a sister, and to take it to this level is — it’s disappointing to see this come from the Party, and I would hope that leaders like Sarah Palin would end this.” Joy Behar thanked her for it, shaking her hand. “Republicans are not speaking out against this and you may be the first one to do it, and I salute you, my girl.” Whoopi Goldberg would say “Republicans, whatever comes from this it’s on your heads.” Something else Hasselbeck said was just flat-out bats–t crazy: HANNITY: It is very sinister to me because I think there’s an effort here to silence opposition voices. And, you know, to exploit a tragedy within two hours the way Paul Krugman did. Now, you really point out, this guy worshipped skulls, he is an atheist, he read Mein Kampf, The Communist Manifesto and smoked dope, and never listen to talk radio according to friends and never watch political debate and hated George Bush. But the narrative has been blame conservatives. HASSELBECK: But we never heard any of that for the first four days. You know, the left wing media, unfortunately Sean, and I’ve been trying not to have to blame anybody in this situation for, you know, wrecking the American people heard by unfortunately, they were so drunk on this cocktail of trying to convict Sarah Palin, that they neglected — when I say neglect, that is with a huge bet that I will say that, neglected to give the American people information because they weren’t searching for it. They had already found their killer. They had already given a man total justification for taking a gun and taking the lives of several human beings and then trying to take the lives of more. Awful, I mean, today we are blessed with the news, right? We have great news about Giffords. And I think that that should have been their first priority, giving us the news, making sure that we understood that the rest were safe. They had the killer. But if you are a crazy person out there, and you know that you have an automatic out to blame it on a politician, what do you think you are going to do? They are lucky that not one more person went out on a spree that day. What? Excuse me? Did I hear this right? Is Hasselbeck actually claiming that the people who warned against the potential for violence being inspired by Palin’s ads were actually giving an excuse to the killer? Not only is that more outrageously speculative than anything written yet about Loughner, it points the finger right back at herself — since at the time, she was one of the people criticizing Palin for the ads. I guess Hasselbeck is blaming herself for Jared Loughner. Who’da thunk?