Home » Posts tagged with » breaking news (Page 722)

In a modern take on Peter Pan , a crocodile in a Ukraine zoo has swallowed a visitor’s cellphone. Rimma Golovko had been stretching out to get a good picture of the croc named Gena when the phone slipped out of her hand. Staff didn’t believe her until it started to…

Continue reading …
Some Thoughts About Olbermann’s Exit From Opposite Sides of the Internet

The internet has been all abuzz since Keith Olbermann's surprise announcement that Friday would be his last appearance on MSNBC's “Countdown.” Over at the liberal website Salon, Steve Kornacki wondered, ” Is Olbermann the victim of his own success? “: MSNBC, for its part, embraced the identity Olbermann was offering them. By 2008, his frequent guest, Rachel Maddow, was given her own show at 9 p.m. And liberal radio host Ed Schultz was given his own shortly after that. Lawrence O’Donnell, another left-of-center voice, was added just a few months ago. Eventually, the network adopted a new motto — “Lean forward” — that’s about as subtle as Fox’s “fair and balanced” pledge. MSNBC’s prime-time lineup is now awash in progressive politics. Of course, now that he’s surrounded by similar voices, Olbermann isn’t nearly as essential to MSNBC’s brand, which surely has something to do with his abrupt departure on Friday night…Now that they’ve built a loyal prime-time audience of left-leaning viewers, NBC’s executives may simply feel that they can afford to be rid of Olbermann and all of the headaches he brings with him. It used to be that he was the only reason liberals turned on their channel at night. Now he’s one of many reasons — a victim of his own success, in other words. Hot Air's Ed Morrissey doesn't agree : Other than Maddow, whom Olbermann most certainly discovered and nurtured into a parallel show, the other people in the lineup had careers in broadcasting before Olbermann.

Continue reading …

Independent forensic experts will have 90 days starting next month to review crucial evidence linking American student Amanda Knox to the murder of her British roommate. The experts appointed by the appeals court, Stefano Conti and Carla Vecchiotti from Rome’s Sapienza University, were formally sworn in at a hearing today,…

Continue reading …
Why does Glenn Beck insist on getting Niemoller’s famous poem wrong?

Click here to view this media Glenn Beck has a history of appropriating Martin Niemoller’s famous poem, “First They Came…” — one of the most memorable descriptions of the creep of Nazi totalitarianism — for his own purposes, often by way of describing his own self-martyrdom, because of course it’s really about people like him: “You ever heard of the old poem ‘first they came for the Jews’? Well, first they came for the banks, then it was the insurance companies, then it was the car companies.” “First they came for the Jews and I stayed silent– next I’ll show you the very latest attacks on me …” He was at it again on Thursday, declaring that attempts to confront his penchant for violent rhetoric and its effects on the public were an evil attempt to silence and persecute poor Glenn: BECK: But the pink symbol should be a lesson to everyone . I don’t care what you are, who you are — everyone! “At first they came for the Jews, and I didn’t say anything. And then they came –” Silence equals death. Never — never allow someone to take away your First Amendment right of free speech. It’s number one for a reason! Because that’s the most important — your right to assemble, your right to speak out! It’s Number One. Guard it. Protect it. Revel in it. Responsibly share it. Of course, that’s the issue, isn’t it? Not that anyone wants to take away Beck’s rights to free speech — but they are concerned because he is so profoundly irresponsible with his abuse of his media megaphone to demonize and smear other people and indulge eliminationist rhetoric against his “progressive” nemeses. But it’s really quite revealing that Beck NEVER gets Niemoller’s poem right. There are a number of different versions with slight variations, but the most common is this one: First they came for the communists, and I didn’t speak out because I wasn’t a communist. Then they came for the trade unionists , and I didn’t speak out because I wasn’t a trade unionist. Then they came for the Jews, and I didn’t speak out because I wasn’t a Jew. Then they came for me and there was no one left to speak out for me. The first two victim groups cited were Communists and trade unionists . Both of whom happen to be groups high on Glenn Beck’s list of groups he likes to demonize. Indeed, for most his tenure at Fox we’ve been hearing about how President Obama is eeeevil because he’s “surrounding himself” with “dedicated Communists” like Van Jones: And of course, someday, he warns, we ordinary liberals are going to have to take those Communists out by “shooting them in the head”. Maybe that’s why Glenn Beck never can get Niemoller’s poem right: It really is about people like him.

Continue reading …
The White Pages Wants to Ban Itself? See the Survey & Sexy Video

Seems we have a new chapter in Phone Book Wars. A new survey finds that a majority of Americans don’t use the White Pages anymore. A majority also don’t recycle it and don’t want it left on their doorstep. Believe it or not, people go online to get information these days…. Read the full story on TreeHugger

Continue reading …

If you can’t buy ‘em , run ‘em out of town seems to be Google’s motto. Mashable reports exclusively that Internet 800-pound gorilla Google is planning to launch “Google Offers,” a service that offers a “pre-paid offers/vouchers program” to local merchants. While not announced, much less launched, it appears to be…

Continue reading …

Neither side is talking about Keith Olbermann’s surprise departure from MSNBC, but the gist from a slew of reports (based on anonymous insiders) is that the host’s long-strained relations with management simply never recovered from his suspension over political donations. (See Politico and the Wall Street Journal for more.)…

Continue reading …
Common Cause: Clarence Thomas Didn’t Report Wife’s Income For Several Years

enlarge Now why would you think they’re laughing at us? I’ve looked into this before , and found there was a decision by the court several years ago in which they said they’re weren’t bound by the same ethics rules as other federal judges. (As I recall, the statement was along the lines of “We’re Supreme Court justices, you should assume we wouldn’t do anything unethical.”) I don’t know about you, but I’m immensely reassured: WASHINGTON…Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas failed over the course of at least five years to report his wife’s income from a conservative think-tank on his financial disclosures , according to the watchdog group Common Cause. Between 2003 and 2007, Virginia Thomas, a longtime conservative activist, was paid $686,589 by the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank, according to a Common Cause review of IRS records. Thomas failed to note the income in his financial disclosure forms for those years, choosing instead to check a box titled “none” where “spousal non-investment income” would normally be disclosed. A Supreme Court spokesperson authorized to speak on behalf of the justices could not immediately be reached for comment late Friday. But Virginia Thomas’ employment by the Heritage Foundation was well known at the time. Virginia Thomas has also been active in the group Liberty Central, an organization she founded for the purpose of restoring the “founding principles” of limited government and individual liberty. In his 2009 disclosure, Justice Thomas also reported spousal income as “none.” Common Cause contends that Liberty Central paid Thomas an unknown salary during that year. Federal judges are bound by law to disclose the source of spousal income, according to Stephen Gillers, a law professor at NYU Law School. Thomas’s omission — which could be interpreted as a violation of that law — could lead to some form of penalty, Gillers said. “It wasn’t a miscalculation, he simply omitted his wife’s source of income for six years, which is a rather dramatic omission,” said Gillers “It could not have been an oversight.” But Steven Lubet, an expert on judicial ethics at Northwestern University School of Law, said that such an infraction was unlikely to result in a penalty. While unfamiliar with the Thomas complaint, he said that failure to disclose spousal income “is not a crime of any sort, but there is a potential civil penalty” for failing to follow the rules. He added: “I am not aware of a single case of a judge being penalized simply for this.” The Supreme Court is, “the only judicial body in the country that is not governed by a set of judicial ethical rules,” Gillers said.

Continue reading …

North Carolina cops are looking for Ann Pettway, the woman who raised a girl stolen from a Harlem hospital at 19 days of age, and now they’re armed with an arrest warrant, reports the New York Post. Pettway, a convicted embezzler on parole, has been missing ever since 23-year-old Carlina…

Continue reading …

Gabrielle Giffords’ Tucson doctors handed her over to Houston rehab officials in a “flawless transfer” yesterday, and the congresswoman responded to Arizona crowds cheering along her route by “smiling and even tearing up a little bit,” says one of her doctors. Giffords’ plane flew 14,000 feet lower than normal…

Continue reading …