Home » Posts tagged with » breaking news (Page 575)
Mubarak supporters fight to take over Egypt’s Tahrir Square

Claims that plainclothes police hidden in ranks as battles take place in the symbolic epicentre of the revolution The men came with baseball bats and pieces of broken window frame, machetes and even a homemade spear. Forming a line, the small group of plainclothes policemen blocked one of the broad boulevards leading into Tahrir Square, the symbolic epicentre of the Egyptian revolution. The police had been driven from the streets they are so used to controlling last Friday and now they had come to reclaim what they regarded as rightfully theirs. As they gathered on Qasr el-Aini, they prepared themselves for confrontation with the protesters who had humiliated them and their president. Yesterday was not a day of revolution. It was the beginning of a vicious counter-revolution in support of Hosni Mubarak’s regime, one that seemed set fair to confirm all his critics’ fears. The day after hundreds of thousands of anti-Mubarak demonstrators had filled Tahrir Square to demand his ousting, the supporters of Egypt’s president of 30 years had come to reclaim it with violence. The men came by car and on foot, some even on camel and horseback, arriving as Mubarak’s regime – in a dramatic U-turn – defiantly rejected international calls for an orderly transition of power. The moment the square was stormed came a few minutes before 2pm. In the hours beforehand, the crowds of pro-Mubarak demonstrators had poured over the Nile bridges to gather on the Corniche outside the state-run TV station, a symbol of Mubarak’s rule half a mile up the road. Egypt’s army, which had said it would not use force on the demonstrators, did nothing to prevent them. What happened next was inevitable as tens of thousands of the regime’s supporters – some of whom had been bussed in from the countryside or were civil servants given a day’s holiday – forced their way into the square. Within minutes scuffles had broken out between the sides that saw bricks hurled and savage beatings delivered with staves. Suddenly, the centre of Cairo divided into two battling factions pelting each other with stones. An hour later, dozens of wounded demonstrators were being treated at an open-air aid station at the entrance to the square. Many had blood streaming from wounds. According to the first reports, by early evening at least one person had died and 600 were injured. It was the pro-Mubarak demonstrators – many of whom were summoned by a text message calling on “Egypt lovers” to congregate at Tahrir – who threw the first rocks, catching their opponents unawares. Soon the pro-democracy protesters were holding up sheets of corrugated metal ripped from a construction site to use as shields against the hail of missiles. Some of the pro-Mubarak demonstrators who were captured by the opposition, it was claimed last night, were carrying ID cards that identified them as police. At 3pm, in an extraordinary development, men mounted on horseback entered the square on the regime’s side, creating an almost medieval tableau. Within two hours Molotov cocktails were being thrown while bursts of automatic weapons fire could be heard. After the peace and celebration of the previous days, it came as a shock to witness such violence in the square. A war, primitive and brutal, had broken out, and its frontline was the country’s famous Egyptian Museum. “Why don’t you protect us?” some of the opposition protesters shouted at soldiers, who replied they did not have orders to do so and told people to go home. “The army is neglectful. They let them [the pro-regimists] in,” said Emad Nafa, 52, who for days had praised the army for remaining neutral. Mubarak supporters managed to gain control of the roofs of two of the main buildings while young men in crash helmets, volunteers on the opposition side, acted as stretcher-bearers. Some of the gunfire could be observed. Guardian reporter Mustafa Khalili watched as one soldier stood on his tank and fired at a pro-Mubarak demonstrator who had targeted him with a rock. Another Guardian reporter saw grown men crying at the chaos and bloodshed on their streets. “When we were fighting the central security forces last week it was liberating,” said one member of the anti-Mubarak opposition. “Yet now we are fighting each other and that breaks my heart.” Anti-government protesters, streaming with blood, were taken to makeshift clinics in mosques and alleyways, some begging the impassive soldiers for protection. “Hosni has opened the door for these thugs to attack us,” one man with a loudspeaker shouted to the crowds during the fighting. “After the revolution, they want to send people here to ruin it for us,” said Ahmed Abdullah, a 47-year-old lawyer. “Why do they want us to be at each other’s throats, with the whole world watching us?” At first some of those on the pro-regime side tried to protect opponents being beaten. The Guardian saw a man being pulled out from the flying fists. But such camaraderie did not last long. It was not only in Cairo that Mubarak’s regime moved to crush dissent with an orchestrated show of force that included the clear collusion of the military. There were pro-regime protests in Egypt’s second city, Alexandria. Earlier yesterday in Tahrir Square, it seemed initially that the supporters of the regime had orders to avoid conflict. At first their demonstration mirrored scenes from Tahrir Square from the past week, when anti-Mubarak protesters led mostly peaceful rallies. Some prayed. A policeman was carried on the shoulders of the crowd – just as a deserting soldier had been carried by the opposition only days before. They carried their pictures of Mubarak and stuck them on tanks – just as the opposition had done with its own slogans and symbols. And while some admitted that they had been bussed from outside the capital in organised groups, others had come for more complex reasons. As the demonstration began, they chanted: “Yes! Mubarak!” “Mubarak is our hero” and “Baradei must go.” But among those interviewed by the Guardian were men who said they had swapped sides after Mubarak’s televised address to the nation on Tuesday night, offering concessions and promising not to stand in elections later this year. “People should leave Tahrir Square,” said Mohamed Megahid, 30, a quality control manager. “The president has made the concessions he was asked for. So now people can go home. If he tries to undo the changes, we can always go back again,” he said. “There needs to be time for change. We cannot just press a button.” Tarik Abdel Yazid, 40, asked: “Those people in the square – where does the money come from?. All those people are being supported by outside, by Qatar, Iran and Hamas.” Their gathering was shot through with bitterness at the jeers that had been hurled against the 82-year-old Mubarak over the past nine days. “I feel humiliated,” said Mohammed Hussein, a 31-year-old factory worker. “He is the symbol of our country. When he is insulted, I am insulted.” By late last night, contact with those trapped in the square was limited to desperate tweets as most journalists were driven out. They spoke chillingly of the army withdrawing from the sidestreets around the square and gangs of pro-Mubarak thugs advancing towards them armed with knives and swords. “God help us all,” said one. Egypt Hosni Mubarak Middle East Protest Peter Beaumont Jack Shenker Mustafa Khalili guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

Las Vegas casinos are readying their defenses against a group of baccarat cheaters, the Las Vegas Sun reports. The group, known as “cutters” and described by police as “extremely well-organized,” are thought to have stolen tens of millions from casinos worldwide. They take advantage of the baccarat custom in which…

Continue reading …
Bird’s Eye Lowdown On The Future Of Solar Power

Image credit: all images in this post are courtesy of Silverado Power. Have you noticed. as I have, that widely reported solar projects in the USA have spectacular or controversial attributes? Computer simulations of huge projects in desert settings were very big in 2010 – creating a stereotype, I’d say. Extra reporting points for protests by environmentalists, charges of government socialism, or a suitably-phallic central heat collection tower. Could the USA miss important opportunities to mainstream renewable energy by focusing on novelty aspects of big solar projects? Yes! Are there subtle public policy choi… Read the full story on TreeHugger

Continue reading …

The upheaval spreading across the Arab world is at heart a movement for self-determination. The west resists it at its peril The fate of the Egyptian uprising is in the balance. There is a revolutionary situation in Egypt , but there has not yet been a revolution. In the wake of Hosni Mubarak’s pledge not to stand again for the presidency next September , gangs of government loyalists were today let loose on the streets of Cairo and Alexandria . First, the army spokesman called for the protesters to stand down now “your message has arrived”. Truckloads of thugs, armed with iron bars and machetes, many clearly members of the

Continue reading …

We have here an interesting situation in the schism on the American right over Egypt. You have the faction, chiefly either religious extremist or concerned first and foremost about Israel or both, that thinks the protestors are rabble and we must not desert Mubarak. Then you have the group, foreign-policy neocons who are at least consistent in their hopes for democracy for the region, that backs the protestors. The leader (one supposes) of the former faction is Glenn Beck, whose conspiracy theories about Egypt were nicely captured by Michelle Goldberg in The Daily Beast. Beck has been banging on about Egypt all week. I tried to watch one installment. It wasn’t even that it was infuriating. It was just incoherent. Goldberg: Beck, hero of the Tea Party, has become the hysterical tribune of the anti-democracy forces, linking the uprising in Egypt to a bizarre alliance of all of his bête noirs. “This is Saul Alinsky. This is STORM from Van Jones,” he warned on Monday, continuing, “The former Soviet Union, everybody, radical Islam, every—this is the story of everyone who has ever plotted to or wanted to fundamentally change or destroy the Western way of life. This isn’t about Egypt. Everything is up on the table.” It would all end, he warned, with the restoration of a “Muslim caliphate that controls the Mideast and parts of Europe,” along with an expanded China and Russian control of the entire Soviet Union “plus maybe the Netherlands.” Mike Huckabee has punched his ticket on this train, as well as Newt Gingrich. Others are behaving more admirably. Golberg cites AEI’s Michael Rubin as being with the protestors. And Max Boot of the Council on Foreign Relations and Commentary has been making good sense : I fully understand the dangers of what is happening in Egypt. I am as apprehensive as anyone about the possibility of the Muslim Brotherhood exploiting current events to gain power. I am fully aware of how Hosni Mubarak has been a useful ally in many ways. Yet, when I watch pro-government thugs attacking peaceful protesters, I am rooting wholeheartedly for the protesters and against the thugs… …The United States, a nation born in a liberal revolution, has no choice but to stand with the people. In many ways, this is a continuation of the same battle fought in the streets of Europe in 1848 and 1989: the quest of a people yearning for freedom against the representatives of a corrupt and entrenched ruling oligarchy. America’s role, as the champion of liberty, should be to usher Mubarak out of power as quickly and painlessly as possible in order to avert further bloodshed and to make it harder for malign elements to take advantage of the disorder for their own nefarious purposes. We did not do enough to aid democrats in Russia in 1917 or in Iran in 1979; in both cases, we stuck with a discredited ancien regime until it was too late and reacted too slowly to revolutionary upheavals. Let us not repeat that mistake in Egypt. The Weekly Standard rounds up 2012 wannabee statements here . Missing? The old half-termer, who’s been pretty mum on Egypt, which after all can’t be seen out of any American windows. This presents an interesting conundrum for her. On the one hand, she’s an inveterate chiliast. On the other hand, she is under the tutelage of some pure neocons. Republicans Egypt Michael Tomasky guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

The red swimsuit—you know, that one—worn by Farrah Fawcett on a pinup poster that sold more than 12 million copies in the ’70s has been donated to the Smithsonian Institution, the LA Times reports. Ryan O’Neal and Nels Van Patten—a friend who was present when the photo…

Continue reading …
Raw Video: Freezing Rain, Ice in New Jersey

It felt like spring in southern New Jersey Wednesday, while residents in the northern half of the state remained locked in winter’s cold grip. Freezing rain and ice played havoc with the morning commute for travelers heading in and out of Newark. (Feb. 2)

Continue reading …
Why Al Jazeera Isn’t Available in the United States

enlarge I’ve been frustrated by the fact that I can’t get Al Jazeera on cable broadcast, only Roku and via my iPhone. While I know there’s a movement afoot to petition cable networks to add it, I have my doubts it will happen. Why? Well, simply put, because the Department of Defense under the Bush administration was offended by their more objective reporting during the invasion of Iraq. Someone pointed me to this 2003 New York Times article with details. Shortly after their official launch, they were attacked non-stop by hackers on the web. They inked a deal with Akamai to serve their content, only to see it abruptly terminated. The English version of Al Jazeera’s Web site was shut by hackers roughly 12 hours after it went online on March 25. For a time, Web users trying to gain access were directed to a Web page bearing an American flag. Akamai, whose clients include MSNBC and CNN, maintains a broad network of servers that provide protection from hacking attempts. It was for that reason, Ms. Tucker said, that Al Jazeera hired the company. “Basically this was our answer to the hacking that has been nonstop and pretty aggressive,” she said. “We had a done-and-dusted deal on March 28. Then yesterday, we get a letter from them terminating the contract.” While the Akamai deal was for web services, cable companies have found a myriad of reasons to keep them out of cable listings. Beginning in 2009, Al Jazeera undertook a grass-roots effort to petition carriers to add them, but to little avail. Burman told The Standard in an e-mail that he believes the main reason the station has not yet won over Americans is that carriers don’t see it as a money maker. “However, we all recognize that the world is getting smaller, and Americans realize that it is essential to know what is happening in the Middle East, in Africa, in Asia and in Latin America, not just the news that is deemed relevant in Atlanta, London or other Western cities.” When AJE is given the chance to fill that vacuum, people will watch, Burman predicts. “And that’s really the name of the game for cable and satellite companies,” he said. Just in case there are other reasons AJE might not be finding favor, IWantAJE.net features a mythbuster page that corrects erroneous beliefs about the network. It claims that the station is not merely an English translation of Al Jazeera Arabic and it has never aired a beheading. Al Jazeera’s reporting on the Egypt uprising has been unparalleled. Coverage on the usual channels has been ridiculously biased, US-centric, and banal. For an example of the differences, if you have the CNN iPhone or iPad app, check the “live” link on it. It goes straight to Egypt State Television. On the other hand, Al Jazeera has consistently provided on-the-street information, even after being cut off by the Egyptian government. Global Grind has an exclusive email interview up with Al-Jazeera anchor Imran Garda , who lays the blame at the feet of an excessively paranoid Bush administration and their feverish need to shape the news as pro-US, anti-Arab. I’d say that’s about right. For several years Al Jazeera English was perceived by American cable providers and the American public as the voice of Al Qaeda and Osama Bin Laden. With its coverage of the uprising in Egypt, do you see a shift in American perception of Al Jazeera English as a legitimate news organization that reports the news in a fair and balanced way? If so, how? Regarding the perception within the US – that is true. Although pre-9-11, and particular pre the US-led invasion of Iraq, we were celebrated by numerous policymakers, intellectuals and journalists. Thomas Friedman of the NY Times wrote a piece in 1999 championing how free, open and credible Al Jazeera was, and how groundbreaking it was for the region, particularly since it upset the status quo of authoritarian leaders running propaganda channels in each country within the Arab world. With the aftermath of 911, I think there was a strong desire to frame the US response, and specifically the “War on Terror” in very clear cut, almost ideological terms. Al Jazeera showing the effects on civilian populations of air raids which the military told the public only killed “insurgents” or “terrorists” certainly didn’t help when you’re in the DOD and trying to assure the public of the absolute righteousness of a just war, whether in trying to oust the Taliban in Afghanistan or topple Saddam Hussein in Iraq. Because seeing those images might just have changed how we viewed what we were doing over there. After all, Walter Cronkite got away with it during the Viet Nam war and look what happened. Can’t have a repeat performance of that in these times, now can we? However, there seems to be a thaw under the Obama administration , but not necessarily with cable companies. The objections from the cable companies have come for both political and commercial reasons, said Burman, the former editor-in-chief of the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. “In 2006, pre-Obama, the experience was a challenging one. Essentially this was a period when a lot of negative stereotypes were associated with Al Jazeera. The effort was a difficult one,” he said, citing the Bush administration’s public hostility to the network. “There was reluctance from these companies to embark in a direction that would perhaps be opposed by the Bush administration. I think that’s changed. I think if anything the Obama administration has indicated to Al Jazeera that it sees us as part of the solution, not part of the problem, ” Burman said. Petition your carrier to add Al Jazeera here .

Continue reading …
How to Kiss Tips, Kissing Benefits for Health and Romance

WebMD talks about kissing, how it strengthens romance, and how to kiss better.

Continue reading …

Nobody tell the terrorists: The US shares a 4,000-mile border with Canada, and 3,968 of those miles don’t meet an “acceptable level” of security, says a new federal audit. Border Patrol “does not have the ability to detect illegal activity across most of the northern border,” say the…

Continue reading …