Home » Posts tagged with » barack-obama (Page 7)
Obama’s no-frills US budget proposal

Barack Obama, the US president, is gearing up to send Congress his budget request for 2012. The Obama administration is wrestling with record budget deficits and a limping economy. And on Wednesday, the head of the US Federal Reserve warned that current job growth is not good enough for a sustained recovery. Al Jazeera’s John Terrett reports.

Continue reading …
How hard would it be to back Egyptian democracy, Mr President? | Joshua Treviño

This is a simple enough choice between liberty and tyranny, yet the White House has done nothing but equivocate and dodge The administration of Barack Obama has reacted to the uprising against Hosni Mubarak with the enthusiasm of a man condemned to consume a gallon of plain yoghurt. The president of the United States is not against Egyptian democracy, exactly – but neither is he especially for it. His administration’s pronouncements on events have reflected his dilatory approach: the day of the revolution’s inception saw his secretary of state affirming the “stability” of the regime; then there was the infamous Robert Gibbs presser in which confusion and uncertainty were clearly communicated; then, there was the White House’s efforts to leak to the press its masterful behind-the-scenes engagement with Egyptian power brokers; and then, there was this past weekend’s jaw-dropping declaration by its envoy Frank Wisner that Mubarak ought to stay . Following that was the secretary of state’s declaration that the American government’s own man in Egypt “does not speak for the American government”. Well. During the 2008 Democratic presidential primaries, Hillary Clinton ran an ad asking whom voters trusted to receive the “3am phone call”. At this point, Egyptians and Americans both would be happy if President Obama handled a call at 3pm. The inability of the United States’s foreign policy apparatus to develop a coherent and public response to the Egyptian revolution is not simply a condemnation of the president’s management. Nor is it a stumble with limited consequences. As the UAE journalist Habiba Hamid quipped, “Imagine the tremendous outpouring of US support that 60 million Egyptians [sic] would have shown had the US actually supported democracy in Egypt.” Indeed, imagine that. Now, though, the post-Mubarak era is both imminent and inevitable – it was so on 25 January – and when it comes, over 80 million Egyptians will remember not that Obama was nuanced and deliberate, but that the United States of America stood against its advent. The real tragedy of the president’s epic mishandling of Egypt is not merely the sceptical-at-best Egypt that will emerge. It’s that Egypt is merely the latest episode in a pattern laid down by Barack Obama in the first two years of his presidency. In just two years, he has faced multiple crises of liberty, democracy and the American national interest abroad – and he has failed each test. Even rhetorical support for those seeking freedom, the bare minimum a president can do, is strikingly absent except under duress. The plain and pathetic reality is that Barack Obama chooses the existing regime over any alternative, and/or against the American ally, every time. Ask the Hondurans who ejected their Chavista president. Ask the Falkland islanders sold out by the Secretary of State Clinton intoning on the “Malvinas”. Ask the east European Nato members stripped of a full American deterrent in the name of a Russia “reset”. Ask the Tunisians who received not a word of endorsement as they ejected Ben Ali. Ask the Iranians who fought and died for their freedom in the hot summer of 2009. And now, ask the Egyptians who gather, once again, in Tahrir Square as you read this. None of this is to say that there is no legitimate apprehension over the Egyptian revolution. That apprehension is well-founded in a country where a “supermajority” polls in favour of the most brutal criminal sanctions in Islam’s name, and where the most organised opposition force, the Muslim Brotherhood, has ideological spinoffs including Hamas and al-Qaida to its credit. The rightful fear of the new Egypt cloaks itself in many justifications, ranging from appeals to Edmund Burke’s cautionary doctrine, to insane conspiracy theories of socialism and universal caliphates. President Obama’s lacklustre response to Egypt’s liberation reflects none of these concerns: only his profound apathy towards the aspiration for freedom, and his striking disconnect from America’s best historic role in the world. Even if the president did share those concerns, the conduct of the Egyptian revolutionaries to date has been generally exemplary in the face of attack, murder, deprivation and arduous struggle. America’s own Declaration of Independence asserts that Egyptians deserve liberty by their very nature as men. Their actions since 25 January only underscore that case. Perhaps they do not deserve American support – but they have earned it. The American people understand that, as shown in the latest Gallup poll revealing 82% public support for Egypt ‘s revolution. Americans who just celebrated the centenary of President Ronald Reagan may well recall his 1982 address to the British parliament, in which he famously declared that Marxism-Leninism would end up “on the ash-heap of history”. But he said something else there that bears repeating as we witness millions of Egyptians seizing their liberties: “[D]emocracy is not a fragile flower. Still it needs cultivating. If the rest of this century is to witness the gradual growth of freedom and democratic ideals, we must take actions to assist the campaign for democracy.” Reagan knew it then. The American people know it now. The Egyptian people know it now. Why doesn’t Barack Obama know it? Egypt Middle East Obama administration Barack Obama United States US foreign policy US politics Ronald Reagan Hosni Mubarak Joshua Treviño guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Lauer to Michelle Obama: ‘Do You Think People Hate Your Husband, Even Those On The Far Right?’

NBC's Matt Lauer seemed shocked that Fox News' Bill O'Reilly, during his Super Bowl interview, actually asked Barack Obama about

Continue reading …
Contessa Brewer’s Liberal Spin: Obama Was at Odds With ‘Conservative’ Chamber of Commerce

Reporting on President Obama's speech to the Chamber of Commerce Monday, MSNBC's Contessa Brewer sloppily labeled the Chamber as “conservative” in narrating the conflict between the business federation and the President. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, though it may have enjoyed the “conservative” label in the past, has supported major liberal legislation over the past few years in the name of being “pro-business.” “Two years, big business and President Obama were at odds,” Brewer introduced the segment. “The boiling point – when Obama accused the conservative Chamber of Commerce of refusing to disclose the millions it spent on campaign ads to defeat Democrats.” The Chamber sent a letter to the U.S. Senate in February of 2009 imploring it to pass the Stimulus bill, H.R. 1. “The legislation is not perfect,” the Chamber confessed, adding that “parts of the bill should be modified or eliminated. However, the Chamber urges the Senate to approve H.R. 1, and encourages Congress and the Administration to work on a conference report that provides timely, targeted, and temporary economic stimulus.”

Continue reading …
CBS ‘Early Show’ Touts Obama’s ‘Olive Branch’ to Business, Ignores Administration’s Expansion of Regulation

At the top of Tuesday's CBS Early Show, co-host Erica Hill cheered President Obama's supposedly pro-business move of speaking at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce on Monday: “Obama's olive branch. The President reaches out into hostile territory and meets with the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, urging the private sector to start hiring.” Introducing the later report on the speech, co-host Chris Wragge touted the event as Obama's continued “effort to make peace with big business,” despite the Chamber being “a group that he has battled ever since he took office.” Senior White House correspondent Bill Plante noted how “Mr. Obama pledged to work on lowering federal spending, revising the corporate tax code, and eliminating some federal regulations.” What the coverage failed to point out was that 43 major new regulations were imposed by the Obama administration in 2010. Interestingly, a report from congressional correspondent Nancy Cordes on Monday's CBS Evening News did feature criticism from the business community over excessive government regulation: “In nearly 2,000 pages of letters to Congress, U.S. businesses unloaded on everything from anti-pollution rules, to new pilot rest requirements, to workplace noise standards, complaining they all kill jobs.” Plante left those details out of his Early Show report. Cordes also featured sound bites of Republican members of Congress calling for less regulation, again something absent in Plante's coverage. What Plante did manage to include was Obama's attack on businesses for not spending enough of their profits on hiring new employees: “The President's message to business? It's time to put their mountain of extra cash to work.” Following Plante's report, Wragge spoke with business and economics correspondent Rebecca Jarvis and promoted the same criticism: “Now companies, they've done extremely well. They've cut a lot of jobs, as we've seen over the years, but their balance sheets are showing record profits. Wall Street's doing very well. So can a speech like this have any impact on these business leaders to go out and then hire more people?” While Plante and Wragge fretted over businesses not hiring enough, they seemed to forget that in early 2010, CBS News itself fired close to 100 staffers . No word yet on many of those people the network news organization has hired back with its own “mountain of cash” ($15 million per year of which goes to CBS Evening News anchor Katie Couric). Concluding his report, Plante argued that “as the President looks forward to his re-election campaign, dissension aside, he stands to benefit from any perceived move toward business – benefit with independents and Republicans.” Here is a full transcript of Plante's February 8 Early Show report: 7:00AM ET TEASE: ERICA HILL: Obama's olive branch. The President reaches out into hostile territory and meets with the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, urging the private sector to start hiring. But did Wall Street buy his message? We have reaction from big business. 7:02AM ET SEGMENT:

Continue reading …
White House Unveils 6-Year, $53 Billion High Speed Rail Plan

Photo: John Leech Call it a “rail shot” — with all the space race allusions being tossed around by the administration of late, this time the term would live up to expectations. The White House has announced a “comprehensive plan” that dedicates $53 billion over the next six years to achieving the president’s newly-minted goal of providing 80% of America with access to high speed rail within a generation. Now this is change we can believe in. Here’s t… Read the full story on TreeHugger

Continue reading …
Egypt’s rich may do business as usual, but their children are protesting

In New Cairo – a satellite city to the east of the capital – life, on the surface at least, seems to have barely changed The grass is cut as finely as ever on the Katameya Heights golf course, and cigars are still being smoked discreetly in the clubhouse. Glancing around the lobby, one could be forgiven for thinking nothing had ever disturbed this gated citadel of Cairo luxury; indeed the ladies’ day Valentine’s tournament is to go ahead as scheduled. There is just one tactful nod to the turmoil that has shaken Egypt to its foundations in the past fortnight: a short letter to members, pinned to a noticeboard by the fountain. “Welcome back – we hope you and your families are all safe,” it reads. “The 18-hole operating hours are as follows.” Barack Obama claims this country “is not going back to what it was”, but in New Cairo – a satellite city to the east of the capital, home to dozens of high-walled residential compounds – life, on the surface at least, seems to have barely changed at all. “Things are back to normal: food is in the shops, the gates are secure, all the cafes are open,” says Wael Hassan, a 34-year-old marketing manager who lives in Al Rehab, one of the oldest private communities in the area. “Naturally people were inconvenienced by the troubles, and no one likes instability. But thankfully things are OK now.”In the nearby courtyard of Costa coffee, a neighbour of Wael’s agreed. “People get tired of revolutions pretty quickly, and when you’re in a self-contained bubble like this it’s hard to associate images on TV with anything that’s happening in real life. So we waited it out and then came out to play; we knew all this disruption wouldn’t last for long.” Yet as Egypt’s pro-change uprising enters its third week, a return to normality in places such as New Cairo is exactly what those camped out 15 miles away in Tahrir Square desperately want to avoid. Carved out of the desert in piecemeal fashion over the past two decades as part of an ambitious and highly controversial urban expansion programme, this elite neighbourhood for many symbolises everything that is wrong with the Mubarak regime. “The corruption and crony capitalism that New Cairo was built on goes to the heart of this government’s contempt for the Egyptian people,” says Hamdy Fakharany, an activist lawyer who has been challenging land sales in the area through the courts. Last year he won a landmark victory after proving that desert plots in Madinaty – a 13sq mile New Cairo compound worth £1.9bn developed by a company with close ties to the Mubarak family – was sold by the Egyptian government at a fraction of the market price. Now judges have ordered the sale agreement to be annulled, threatening similar development contracts with the same fate and throwing the entire district’s future into chaos. “When they sold off our public land to their friends, they did it because they knew they could get away with it – they were not afraid of the people,” says Fakharany, who believes that up to 26,000sq miles of desert land has been misappropriated in Egypt over the past few years, the cumulative size of five nearby Arab countries. “My court cases, and now this revolution, means they can’t be that complacent anymore.” The nepotism that marked New Cairo’s astonishing growth in recent years is not the only reason it has come to symbolise Egypt’s perceived backsliding under Mubarak. As a refuge for the upper classes fleeing Cairo’s demographic explosion, New Cairo also stands as a glaring example of the growing divide between rich and poor that characterised the government of the prime minister Ahmed Nazif – an economic reformist, and one of those who lost his job in Mubarak’s recent reshuffle. Nazif oversaw a replacement of progressive fiscal policies with a flat-rate income tax, refused to raise the minimum wage above £3.50 a month, and presided over a rise in the proportion of those living below the poverty line – who now account for 40% of the population. And yet, despite the contrast between New Cairo and the plethora of poor, redbrick ashwa’iyat (informal neighbourhoods) nearby, attitudes to the current protests do not split neatly along class lines. “Lots of people from here travelled to join the demonstrations, even when their parents told them not to,” says Salma Tariq, a 26-year-old New Cairo resident. “Yes our families have done well out of the regime and you might think that we have an interest in preserving the status quo, but in reality the youth here have the same frustrations as anyone else in Egypt: we want freedom, we want to stop being afraid of the police, we want a chance to shape our own future.”When the uprising started many of the young men in this neighbourhood split into groups and alternated between going to the protests and staying home to defend our properties from looters. Some people I know were fleeing the country, and one got on a private jet to Greece – but these were the minority. As the labourers tending to half-built villas begin to drift back to work, and upscale franchised coffee chains roll back their shutters, the rhythms of life in New Cairo are slowly returning to normal. But that doesn’t mean that nothing has been altered. “Look at those protesting in Tahrir: you have the poor, but you also have young people who are the cream of the elite,” says Prof Ahmed Okasha, a psychiatrist based in New Cairo. “This revolution has changed the character of the Egyptian people and broken their fear; that applies as much to this town as it does to anywhere else. Some here will cling on to their privileges, but their children are with the protesters. No one will be able to go on pretending nothing has happened for long.” Egypt Middle East Jack Shenker guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
DOE Launches Effort to Bring Cost of Solar Down 75% by 2020

Photo: Green Technology In the days following Obama’s State of the Union address , Stephen Chu took center stage in the energy arena to announce a “Sun shot” — a government-funded effort to innovate the technology necessary to make solar power competitive against fossil fuels. The details of that plan have now been outlined: the Department of… Read the full story on TreeHugger

Continue reading …

Barack Obama extended the olive branch to the US Chamber of Commerce today, pledging to work to expand trade opportunities and cut away burdensome regulations. But he also took a page out of JFK’s book, telling executives to “ask yourselves what you can do for America,” according to NPR . “Now…

Continue reading …

Soon, you may be able to forget about getting a flu shot each year—because just one jab could cover you for all strains of the illness. Oxford University scientists tested a universal flu vaccine on humans for the first time, and found it to be successful, the Guardian reports….

Continue reading …