Home » Posts tagged with » barack-obama (Page 11)

The BBC is to make an official protest to the Egyptian authorities after one of its journalists was assaulted by police in Cairo today. Assad Sawey , the BBC’s Cairo correspondent, was deliberately assaulted by police while reporting on a baton charge during the street protests. When surrounded by men who appeared to be plain clothes security men, he identified himself as a BBC journalist. He was repeatedly hit, taking blows to the head. He reported that they beat him with steel bars , “the ones used here for slaughtering animals.” His camera was confiscated and he was arrested. After being released without charge, he received medical attention for a head wound, and then continued reporting. The BBC’s global news director Peter Horrocks said: “The BBC condemns this assault on one of our correspondents by the authorities. We shall be forcefully protesting this brutal action directly to the Egyptian authorities. “It is vital that all journalists, whether from the BBC or elsewhere, are allowed to do their job of bringing accurate, impartial eye witness reports to audiences around the world without fear.” Source: BBC World Service Journalist safety Egypt Press freedom BBC World Service Middle East Roy Greenslade guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

Right now, Barack Obama’s approval ratings are riding high in the wake of a strongly bipartisan State of the Union address and lovely Arizona speech. But there’s plenty of time for all that to change before the 2012 election, writes GOP operative Mark McKinnon in the Daily Beast : “@#&! Happens…

Continue reading …
Bill Maher on SOTU ‘Date Night’, Crying Boehner and Bachmann Getting Air Time on CNN

Click here to view this media Bill Maher weighed in before yesterday’s State of the Union address on CNN and had a few things to say about gun control after the tragic shootings in Arizona, the ridiculous “date night” seating arrangements, crying John Boehner, Michele Bachmann getting air time on CNN to respond to the SOTU and the continual move to the right by our politicians. BLITZER: I’m told, Bill, that the president of the United States has decided, despite what happened in Tucson, he will not specifically talk about guns in his speech tonight. He’s going to do that down the road in a future speech in a few weeks. But, tonight, the word gun is not going to be there. You think that’s a mistake, don’t you? MAHER: Oh, I do. That’s a real shame. And it’s always down the road. And it’s always finding common ground with this president. And that common ground always seems to be the ground where the Republicans are already standing on. So, no, that’s a real shame, because this was again an opportunity, similar to the opportunity Ronald Reagan had in 1981, when he was shot. At a moment like that, maybe people would be willing to go along with a — sort of a different point of view. Even Dick Cheney said that. Dick Cheney seems to be to the left of Barack Obama on the gun issue. So, I guess it’s true. He has moved to the center. BLITZER: Well, and it’s helping him in the polls. There’s no doubt about that. You can see, in our most recent job approval number, 55 percent. It was in the 40s, low 40s, not that long ago. So this move to the center, it certainly seems to be helping him with the American public. MAHER: Well, we don’t know what’s helping him. Maybe it’s the fact that there was a tragedy. People tend to rally around the president when there’s any sort of a tragedy. Remember, after 9/11, Bush’s approval rating was 90 percent or something. I don’t think that was because he got a lot smarter after we were attacked. Maybe it’s because — Obama’s popularity hiked because people have now seen the opposition. They got a good look at Boehner. Maybe they don’t like that. Maybe people don’t like someone who cries at the drop of a hat. People don’t like a crier, Wolf. You know, women say they do, but they really don’t. How many times have you really cried in front of your wife? BLITZER: Me? Are you saying — are you asking me? MAHER: Yes. BLITZER: A few times. I see a nice… MAHER: Yes, a few times. BLITZER: I see a nice movie that brings a tear to my eye, I hear about a good person who — who got hurt. I heard about that 9-year- old little girl who was killed in Tucson, I started to cry. I’m not ashamed to say that. Those were pretty sad moments. MAHER: Right. But John Boehner cries just because he wakes up being John Boehner. You don’t do that. Blitzer: No. I don’t cry because I wake up being Wolf Blitzer. That’s — that’s for sure. What do you think about date night? MAHER: I think that during this speech… BLITZER: Date night on Capitol Hill. MAHER: … Joe Biden, who is going to sit next to him, should hand him a box of Kleenex during the speech. BLITZER: He’s an emotional guy, John Boehner. You know, he’s got — he’s got an incredible story. When you think about it, he was one of, what, ten kids growing up. His father had a little bar. They had a small House, one bathroom. And look, he’s now the speaker of the House, second in line after the vice president to the presidency. So it’s — he’s got an amazing story. And I can understand why he gets emotional. MAHER: Wolf, first of all, get over it. That was a long time ago. It’s America. Yes, we understand. People can rise up from places of humble beginnings and make something great of themselves. Most of that is anecdotal. Statistically, people don’t do that any more. America is not, I don’t think, even in the top ten or maybe we’re tenth in social mobility. Social mobility means the ability of one generation to do a little better than the generation that proceeded them, that spawned them. That used to be known as the American dream. That is the American dream. But we’re like tenth in the American dream. BLITZER: All right. MAHER: It’s like Mexico coming in tenth in the Mexican hat dance. BLITZER: The fact that they got — they’re going to be sitting Democrat and Republican together tonight, date night on Capitol Hill. Is that good or bad? MAHER: Oh, I think it’s going to solve all our problems, Wolf. Yes. When a madman kills people at the Safeway, the problem isn’t guns or nuts. It’s that we haven’t been polite enough to each other. Yes, if Barney Frank and Rand Paul are sharing an armrest, I expect all our problems to go away. You know, of course, as always — as always, Wolf, it’s symbolism. That’s all we know how to do. We don’t know how to actually solve problems anymore. We just know how to attack it symbolically. And also, I don’t even think it’s helpful on that level, because it’s actually good to see the parties sitting apart from each other. Because then you see which one cheers or which one sits on their hands according to what the president says, and you get a real feeling for how they feel about him. BLITZER: What’s unusual tonight also, not only that they’re going to be sitting next to each other — they’ve got dates — is that there will be the president’s State of the Union address. The official Republican response from Republican Congressman Paul Ryan, a rising star in the GOP of Wisconsin, the chairman of the budget committee. And then another response from Republican Congressman — woman Michele Bachmann, who’s representing the Tea Party Express. We’ll carry all of that live here on CNN. I don’t know about the other networks, but we’ll let — we’ll let all of those speeches breath. What do you think about the decision by the Tea Party to go ahead and have their own response? MAHER: Well, I understand why they would. Who wouldn’t want to? I don’t understand the decision by CNN to air it. Why are you giving two — why are you giving air time to basically two Republican responses? I mean, the Tea Party is the Republican Party. It’s just a rebranding. The Republican Party realized a couple of years ago they were very unpopular with the American public, possibly because all of their ideas had been miserable failures over the last 10, 20, 30 years. So they rebranded as the Tea Party. Why don’t you give equal time to the Democratic response, and then have Representative Anthony Weiner, who’s from the more progressive wing of the Democratic Party, why doesn’t he get some — some air time? BLITZER: Well, I’m sure — I’m sure he’ll get plenty of opportunities. We’d love to have him in THE SITUATION ROOM. He can — he can respond. I will point out, the president will speak, probably, for an hour. Paul Ryan will speak maybe for 10 or 15 minutes. And Michele Bachmann’s speech will be very short. So in terms of the amount of time that the response will be is nothing compared to what the president of the United States will deliver in making his message, as it should be, since he is, after all, the president of the United States. And this is the State of the Union address, although we will be getting some responses. Give me a grade for the president right now, halfway into his presidential term, two years into this presidency. Does he get an A, B, C, D or F? MAHER: Well, I mean, I guess I’d give him a C-plus at this point. Obviously, he had a lot to deal with when he started, when he came into office. You know, I used to say he was — he was the maid after Led Zeppelin had been in the hotel room. But you know, quite frankly, he’s given up too much of, you know, what I’m calling this common ground. What he calls this common ground. And I don’t really see that we have two policies on enough issues in this country. You know, I keep reading in the newspaper, what would you like — you know, different writers, what would you like to see the president say? Well, I’d like him to say, “OK, let’s get rid of health care, the plan we passed, and let’s have Medicare for all. Let’s have a single-payer system.” That should be the position of a progressive party in this country, if we had one. I’d like to see him say, “We’re pulling the troops out of Iraq and Afghanistan. And not just there, out of Germany and Korea and Japan and all the places in the world where we have a far-flung empire. And while we’re ending wars, we’re also going to end the drug war. And we’re going to take on the gun lobby.” You know, I’d like to see him do all this stuff. But we don’t have a progressive party in this country. We have a right-wing party, and we have a center-right party. So to me, that’s where all our problems come from. BLITZER: Bill Maher, thanks very much for coming in, as usual, and we’ll have you back.

Continue reading …

Rep. John Boehner retreated from his earlier assertions that we should raise the retirement age to 70 to begin collecting Social Security. House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) said he “made a mistake” when he suggested raising the retirement age to 70 last year. The Speaker indicated he was premature in suggesting raising the legal age at which retirees are eligible for full Social Security benefits, since he didn’t want to pre-judge a debate over how to fix the entitlement program. He said he wouldn’t rule out raising the retirement age, however. “I made a mistake when I did that, because I think having the conversation about how big the problem is is the first step,” Boehner said Wednesday evening on CNN . “And once the American people understand how big the problem is, then you can begin to outline an array of possible solutions.” His comments walk back remarks from late June, when he said the retirement age would eventually need to be raised by five years , from 65 to 70. “I think that raising the retirement age — going out 20 years, so you’re not affecting anyone close to retirement — and eventually getting the retirement age to 70 is a step that needs to be taken,” he said at the time. Republicans have been talking tough on entitlements and Social Security, and GOP leaders in the House have expressed dissatisfaction with President Obama’s comments about the program during his State of the Union address on Tuesday. He doesn’t mind using the lie that our life expectancy is going up to attack Social Security benefits. “When you look at life expectancy in America today and you look at the Social Security system, we’re all living far longer than anyone had ever anticipated and the result of these big demographic changes is having a disastrous effect on the Social Security program,” he said. “And so raising the retirement age or considering it is something that ought to be on the table.” These rich politicians and pundits have no problem saying we have to have an adult conversation . I guess lying is an adult thing to do.

Continue reading …
In Major Speeches, Obama Talks Climate Less than Clinton, Bush

Image: Gawker There are some that herald Barack Obama as the greenest president in a long time. And it’s true — his administration has done more than any other in recent memory to reign in pollution and promote clean energy. Aggressive CAFE standards , a mobilized EPA, and clean energy stimulus in the Recovery Act were all jumps in the right direction. So he walks the walk — why isn’t he talking the talk? At least, not … Read the full story on TreeHugger

Continue reading …
Obama’s Time Cover Transition: From FDR To Reagan

What a difference a shellacking makes . . . Just after Barack Obama won the White House in 2008, Time photoshopped him into an iconic FDR photo at the wheel of a convertible, jaunty cigarette-holder in mouth. Obama was riding high as the champion of the left, the promise and personification of a born-again big-government New Deal. That was then, this is the 9+% unemployment, recent-shellacking now. So with which president does Time now find it in the president's interest to be associated? Why, Ronald Reagan, of course.

Continue reading …

By Joe Conason Complaints about President Obama’s State of the Union address on both sides of the political divide (which was obscured but not obliterated by the evening’s novel seating arrangements) seemed to miss its point and purpose. Related Entries January 26, 2011 Barack Obama: Paradoxical Whig January 26, 2011 ‘Daily Show’: Rahm’s Residency Rumble

Continue reading …
America’s Freshmen Are Really Stressed Out

Wedged between past years of standardized testing and fixating on applications and a future of paying off hefty loans with no guarantees of gainful employment, first-year college students around the country are registering higher levels of stress and poorer emotional health, according to a long-standing survey out of UCLA.

Continue reading …
NBC’s Today Show Depicts GOP as a Party Divided

NBC's Today show, on Wednesday, used the occasion of two responses to Barack Obama's State of the Union speech, by Republicans Paul Ryan and Michele Bachmann, as an opportunity to portray the GOP as a party divided. Despite a historic victory by Republicans in last year's midterm elections NBC anchors, past and present, on this morning's Today show, took pains to portray the

Continue reading …
Ari Fleischer Educates David Gergen on Danger of New ‘Investments’ With Huge Budget Deficits

David Gergen not surprisingly believes that increased federal spending on education – or “investments” as Democrats like to say – is essential irrespective of our nation's current fiscal crisis. On “Anderson Cooper 360″ following the President's State of the Union address, former Bush press secretary Ari Fleischer did his darnedest to explain to the CNN senior political analyst that our mammoth budget deficits should first be brought under control before any additional outlays are considered (video follows with transcript and commentary): DAVID GERGEN, CNN SENIOR POLITICAL ANALYST: I agree but let me ask Ari this question, Anderson. Because Republicans have sort of said basically we don't like all this investment to become better — more competitive and everything. It sounds just like more spending. But Ari, didn't George W. Bush embrace this whole report on being more competitive that came out of the National Academies of Science and Engineering and put it forward and got it approved on Capitol Hill? Aren't — aren't people in the Republican Party fundamentally for this? ARI FLEISCHER, FORMER PRESS SECRETARY FOR PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH: You — you bet that's one of the reasons that Paul Ryan is right, both parties have contributed to what's now is a crisis in spending. GERGEN: But no, you are right. No, no, I'm talking about the competitiveness agenda. (CROSSTALK) FLEISCHER: Certainly some people have — (CROSSTALK) GERGEN: Didn't — didn't George W. Bush — didn't you know, I thought he came out in four square in favor of it. FLEISCHER: But the point today is when you have a $1.4 trillion from deficit, you can't look at things from 2006 eyes or 2004 eyes. You've got to look at them with 2011 eyes. GERGEN: So it's no longer important — FLEISCHER: There's no longer — GERGEN: — if the teachers are going to teach science and math? FLEISCHER: We can no longer afford a lot of the things we want and that's what got us into the deep hole we keep paying for all of the things that we like. GERGEN: We can't get — we can't — we can't pay for teachers who are going to educate our kids on science and math, we can't pay for them? Are you really serious? FLEISCHER: Look, listen, what you're saying is, is you want to talk about specific spending increase, but I didn't hear President Obama talked about what specifics he would cut. And this is the problem in Washington, the conversation always begins with the compassionate as measured by how much more money can we spend with this group or that group. GERGEN: Educating — educating our kids is not about compassion. (CROSSTALK) FLEISCHER: Well, I'd rather start the conversation with how we reduce the deficit and the debt. And then at the end of that conversation, if there's room for some spending then, take a look at it but we've got the order wrong in Washington. GERGEN: Which — would you — would you be willing to take away the tax cuts for the top people in order to pay for new teachers in science and math? FLEISCHER: Are you asking me if I'd be willing to raise taxes to redistribute income? GERGEN: No, to — to pay for teachers. FLEISCHER: No, I want to have — I want a tax policy that — I want to have a policy that promotes growth in this country. And one of the interesting things that is going to be is to see whether that December agreement between Democrats and Republicans that have extended the tax rates indeed creates growth, we don't know yet. That's going to be the big question. What viewers witnessed was a classic battle between Right and Left that is likely going to be waged for the rest of our lives. Liberals like Gergen want government to solve problems regardless of whether there's money for it. Conservatives like Fleischer look at things from a more business-like perspective and only want to spend money if it's available. Let's assume America was a corporation whose sales were down (tax revenues) and was bleeding red ink because of rising costs (spending). A solution to this problem is additional training for our employees (education), but we don't have the funds for it because we're already losing money every quarter and are having to borrow monthly to pay our bills. Do we borrow even more to train our people thereby putting additional pressure on our stock and risking a downgrade from bond rating companies, or do we figure out a way to cut our expenses to pay for the training? Obviously, what a smart management team does is that latter. Unfortunately, liberals like Gergen don't see it that way. Instead, his view is to spend the money and try to make up the difference by raising taxes despite Presidents Obama and Clinton informing the nation in December that doing so with this fragile economy could send us into a recession. Going back to the corporate analogy, if our solution to funding the training was raising prices on our products, we likely would find that this wouldn't work under current economic conditions, and our sales would actually end up declining furthering our financial woes. As it pertains to the country's problems, since the Left never wants to cut spending on anything, raising taxes as we pay for education will do nothing to solve our fiscal crisis. Sadly, Fleischer could talk to Gergen or virtually any other liberal media member till he was blue in the face without him or her understanding this logic. Makes you wonder if the way to solve the nation's problems is demanding that all press members go back to school to learn some basic theories of business and economics. Now that's an education program conservatives would support. (H/T Breitbart )

Continue reading …