Home » Posts tagged with » america (Page 6)
Barack Obama announces total withdrawal of US troops from Iraq

President says ‘America’s war in Iraq will be over’ with decision to pull all troops from Iraq by the end of the year President Barack Obama on Friday declared an end to the Iraq war by announcing that all American troops would be withdrawn from the country by year’s end. Obama’s statement put an end to months of wrangling over whether the US would maintain a force in Iraq beyond 2011. He never mentioned the tense and ultimately fruitless negotiations with Iraq over whether to keep several thousand US forces there as a training force and a hedge against meddling from Iran or other outside forces. Instead, Obama spoke of a promise kept, a new day for a self-reliant Iraq and a focus on building up the economy at home. “I can report that, as promised, the rest of our troops in Iraq will come home by the end of the year,” Obama said. “After nearly nine years, America’s war in Iraq will be over.” Obama spoke after a private video conference with Iraqi prime minister Nouri al-Maliki, and he offered assurances that the two leaders agreed on the decision. The US military presence in Iraq stands at just under 40,000. All US troops are to exit the country in accordance with a deal struck between the countries in 2008 when George Bush was president. Obama, an opponent of the war from the start, took office and accelerated the end of the conflict. In August 2010, he declared the US combat mission over. “Over the next two months our troops in Iraq, tens of thousands of them, will pack up their gear and board convoys for the journey home,” Obama said. “The last American soldier will cross the border out of Iraq with their heads held high, proud of their success and knowing that the American people stand united in our support for our troops.” More than 4,400 American military members have been killed since the US and its allies invaded Iraq in March 2003. The Associated Press first reported last week that the United States would not keep troops in Iraq past the year-end withdrawal deadline, except for some soldiers attached to the US embassy. Denis McDonough, the White House’s deputy national security adviser, said that in addition to the standard Marine security detail, the US will also have 4,000 to 5,000 contractors to provide security for US diplomats, including at the US embassy in Baghdad and US consulates in Basra and Erbil. In recent months, Washington had been discussing with Iraqi leaders the possibility of several thousand American troops remaining to continue training Iraqi security forces. Throughout the discussions, Iraqi leaders refused to give US troops immunity from prosecution in Iraqi courts, and the Americans refused to stay without that guarantee. Moreover, Iraq’s leadership has been split on whether it wanted American forces to stay. When the 2008 agreement requiring all US forces to leave Iraq was passed, many US officials assumed it would inevitably be renegotiated so that Americans could stay longer. The US said repeatedly this year it would entertain an offer from the Iraqis to have a small force stay behind, and the Iraqis said they would like American military help. But as the year wore on and the number of American troops that Washington was suggesting could stay behind dropped, it became increasingly clear that a US troop presence was not a sure thing. The issue of legal protection for the Americans was the deal-breaker. But administration officials said they feel confident that the Iraqi security forces are well prepared to take the lead in their country. McDonough said assessment after assessment of the preparedness of Iraqi forces concluded that “these guys are ready; these guys are capable; these guys are proven; importantly, they’re proven because they’ve been tested in a lot of the kinds of threats that they’re going to see going forward. “So we feel very good about that.” Pulling troops out by the end of this year allows both Maliki and Obama to claim victory. Obama kept a campaign promise to end the war, and Maliki will have ended the American presence and restored Iraqi sovereignty. The president used the war statement to once again turn attention back to the economy, the domestic concern that is expected to determine whether he wins re-election next year. “After a decade of war the nation that we need to build and the nation that we will build is our own, an America that sees its economic strength restored just as we’ve restored our leadership around the globe.” US foreign policy Barack Obama Iraq US military Middle East guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Everything The Media Told You About Occupy Wall Street Is Wrong

After 10 days out of town, I finally made it to Occupy Wall Street on Tuesday and had a chance to see for myself what’s going on. My conclusion: almost everything the media told me about the protest is wrong. Based on my observations, here’s what I consider the Top Ten Myths About Occupy Wall Street. Myth #1. The Movement Is Violent. One of the most striking images I witnessed at the demonstration was a young black man holding a sign that read “End NYPD Violence!” in front of a group of police officers. The officers quickly challenged his accusation. But the young man didn’t leave. Next, the police turned away and ignored him. But he still didn’t leave. Then the officers chuckled and let out an unexpected laugh when they realized the man wasn’t going away. The scene was confrontational, but definitely not violent. In fact, one of the first things I noticed was a sign posted on a wall that embraced “Kingian Nonviolence,” the peaceful principles that guided Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Myth #2. It’s Just A Bunch Of Pampered Kids. Although I supported the concept of the Occupy Wall Street movement when I first heard of it, I admit I didn’t think the group had much to offer me. From what I could see in the media, they were well-educated, well-intentioned young white people, but they didn’t really represent me. I was wrong. What I found was a wide-ranging group of people from various backgrounds, young and old, male and female, black, white, Latin, Asian and mixed. It was the essence of New York, the reason why I moved to this city 10 years ago. Myth #3. There Are No Black People Involved. I was taken aback by how many black and Latino participants I noticed at the demonstration. I hadn’t seen them on the television coverage of the movement, but they were clearly there. Myth #4. They’re Anti-American. In my experience, I saw a lot of American flags being waved proudly at the demonstration. The protesters may not all think the same things, but many of them were clearly hoping America would live up to its promise as a land of opportunity where the rules are fair and all are welcome. Myth #5. They’re Just Modern-Day Hippies. To watch some of the media coverage of the movement, you would think the protest was filled with long-haired hippies left over from the 1960s. In fact, from my experience, I saw a few people who might fit this description, but I also saw just about every type of person you could imagine at the demonstration. There were high school-aged kids with their parents, college students in their school sweatshirts, men in business suits, mothers with baby carriages, people with jobs, people who were unemployed, white-haired retirees, African drummers, rhythmic dancers, and one person who appeared to be wearing pajamas. Myth #6. They Don’t Know What They Want. I found many different people gathered in Zuccotti Park with many different interests and agendas, but they seem to be unified by one common purpose. They’re tired of a system that seems only to cater to the rich and powerful while ignoring the concerns of the vast majority of Americans. Myth #7. The Labor Unions Are Behind This. I saw only one labor union table at the demonstration, but most of the people seemed to have no connection to organized labor. Even if they had, there’s nothing wrong with that. Labor unions are an important part of our country, and while not perfect, they’ve helped throughout history to improve working conditions for millions of Americans. Myth #8. They’re Pro-Obama. They’re Anti-Obama. “I don’t have facts to back this up,” Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain said in an interview recently, “but I happen to believe that these demonstrations are planned and orchestrated to distract from the failed policies of the Obama administration.” That seems unlikely. Not long after I arrived I found a Hispanic man in a camouflage jacket complaining about Obama to a small crowd of onlookers. “Obama is not the savior,” he cried out. Moments after he finished, a young black man in a sweat jacket stood up to defend Obama to the crowd, acknowledging that the president wasn’t perfect but he was doing the best job he could to clean up the mess he had inherited. Both sides had their points to make and both were respectfully acknowledged. Myth #9. They’re In The Wrong Place. I love to hear conservatives complaining that the protesters should be in Washington instead of Wall Street, as if the conservatives were really concerned about the most effective way for the demonstrators to make their case. This location-based argument suggests a limiting “either/or” mentality that you can’t be in both places, and also assumes that there’s no reason to be on Wall Street at all. As Herman Cain said recently, “Don’t blame Wall Street. Don’t blame the big banks. If you don’t have a job and you’re not rich, blame yourself. But there’s a good reason why Wall Street serves as an ideal venue for the demonstration. Unlike politicians in Washington, who have to answer to voters every few years, corporate executives on Wall Street don’t have to answer to the public, even though their actions have a huge impact on all of us. It seems to me, the protesters picked a reasonable venue to launch their movement. In fact, judging by the row of satellite trucks parked outside the protest, I’d say Wall Street was exactly the right place to draw attention to their cause. Myth #10. They’re Taking Over Wall Street. I’ve lived in New York City for 10 years, but I’d never been to Zuccotti Park until the Occupy Wall Street protests took place. I assumed the protesters were camped out at a park somewhere at the end of Wall Street, throwing around garbage and creating a mess. Once again, I was wrong. First, the group was clean, neat and orderly when I saw them. The park was actually cleaner than any park I’ve ever seen in New York City. Some demonstrators even walked around with brooms to clean up any mess that might have been left, and signs were posted advising the occupiers to observe a “good neighbor policy.” Finally, as it turns out, Zuccotti Park isn’t even on Wall Street. It’s a couple blocks away. As you can see from the image below, the only mess on Wall Street came from the police horses standing guard in front of the New York Stock Exchange.

Continue reading …
Jon Stewart Rips GOP For ‘Pitting Americans Against Americans’ With ‘Take Our Country Back’ Rhetoric (VIDEO)

Conservative rhetoric is by no means a new subject on “The Daily Show,” but on Tuesday night’s episode, Jon Stewart began the show with a lengthy segment on just that — and what it means in the wake of Occupy Wall Street. You’d think the GOP’s “Take it to the streets,” “Ready for battle” expressions would coincide with what’s going on in cities across America right now, but the party is primarily opposed to the populist uprising. Specifically, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, whose sentiments on class warfare caught Stewart’s attention most of all. Cantor had previously said that Americans need to “Take this country back” but now, after a month of Occupy Wall Street protests, fears class warfare and is accusing the movement of pitting Americans against Americans. Stewart saw a hole in his logic right away: “If Republicans don’t condone pitting Americans against Americans, well then, who is that we americans should be ‘taking this country back’ from?” Of course, Stewart was ready with a slew of clips to back up his argument, showing just who conservatives think America’s enemies really are. The list goes on and on, including (but not limited to) liberals, federal employees, activist judges, global warming advocates, the entertainment media, “Tenured professors who can flunk you if you’re conservative,” according to Newt Gingrich, and “gay people who are living together.” There are so many that Stewart had to put it all into a Venn diagram, and in the process, might have just figured out who Mitt Romney really is. Watch the full segment above (or click here to watch on “The Daily Show” website) to hear the rest of Stewart’s analysis, including how hard it must be for the GOP to “Love America so much, but hate almost three-quarters of the people in it.”

Continue reading …
Raw Footage of Hillary Clinton Getting the News of Gaddafi

Click here to view this media (Daily Mail) In a year that has already brought the death of America’s most-wanted terrorist, news of Muammar al-Gaddafi’s capture and death proves one can still shock Hillary Clinton. Mrs Clinton was preparing for interviews in Kabul, Afghanistan, when top aide Huma Abedin handed her a BlackBerry with the first news of Muammar Gaddafi’s capture. ‘Wow,’ the secretary of state exclaims. ‘Unconfirmed reports about Gaddafi being captured.’

Continue reading …
Time Magazine Asks: ‘Is Herman Cain the Most Unctuous Black Man Alive?’

The author who calls himself simply Toure — a regular guest on MSNBC, and before that on CNN — is throwing rhetorical bricks at Herman Cain for Time magazine. His article is headlined “Is Herman Cain the Most Unctuous Black Man Alive? Why the Hermanator experience is making me sick.” Toure has compared Cain to a circus

Continue reading …
Time Magazine Asks: ‘Is Herman Cain the Most Unctuous Black Man Alive?’

The author who calls himself simply Toure — a regular guest on MSNBC, and before that on CNN — is throwing rhetorical bricks at Herman Cain for Time magazine. His article is headlined “Is Herman Cain the Most Unctuous Black Man Alive? Why the Hermanator experience is making me sick.” Toure has compared Cain to a circus

Continue reading …
Time Magazine Asks: ‘Is Herman Cain the Most Unctuous Black Man Alive?’

The author who calls himself simply Toure — a regular guest on MSNBC, and before that on CNN — is throwing rhetorical bricks at Herman Cain for Time magazine. His article is headlined “Is Herman Cain the Most Unctuous Black Man Alive? Why the Hermanator experience is making me sick.” Toure has compared Cain to a circus

Continue reading …
Time Magazine Asks: ‘Is Herman Cain the Most Unctuous Black Man Alive?’

The author who calls himself simply Toure — a regular guest on MSNBC, and before that on CNN — is throwing rhetorical bricks at Herman Cain for Time magazine. His article is headlined “Is Herman Cain the Most Unctuous Black Man Alive? Why the Hermanator experience is making me sick.” Toure has compared Cain to a circus

Continue reading …
Liberal Black Journalist Demands NPR Get Beyond Its White ‘Liberal Myopia’

On the Washington Post-owned black commentary website The Root, managing editor Joel Dreyfuss wrote an open letter to Gary Knell, the new CEO of NPR, insisting the firing of Juan Williams means NPR should respond by going beyond its white liberal “myopia” and broadening the network to more “black voices and brown voices and white voices that challenge conventional liberal thinking.” Dreyfuss applauded Knell for “your efforts to set a new tone on this volatile topic after the nasty fallout that followed the clumsy exit of commentator Juan Williams early this year. The highly publicized incident left NPR with a tarnished image, seen by many as hypocritical in its tolerance of a variety of voices, and questionable when it came to giving people of color a significant role.” Dreyfuss added: But don't mistake the fiery exit of Williams as just a nasty personnel matter gone nuclear. His departure was a sad commentary on the monochromatic vision of many liberal institutions — a disease that NPR has not escaped. Sometimes a conservative gets attention for saying or doing something that is obvious. Richard Nixon decided it was silly to pretend that communist China and its 1 billion people didn't exist. Gerald Ford admitted our defeat in Vietnam and cut our losses. And Williams says that National Public Radio has treated blacks poorly. In my opinion, Ellen Weiss, the woman who fired Williams and later resigned for her poor handling of the incident, was a powerful example of the profound challenge you face at NPR. I only met Weiss once, about a decade ago, but I never forgot our conversation. We were chatting over hors d'oeuvres at a convention of the National Association of Black Journalists, the organization I helped create. “So what do you think of All Things Considered ?” she asked, referring to the flagship NPR show she produced for many years. “I love the show,” I admitted. “But why does it have to be so white?” “But we have Juan Williams ,” she replied defensively. I almost choked on my stuffed mushroom. But since she was paying for the canap

Continue reading …

You may remember Ed Henry as a former reporter from CNN who now works for Fox. Today he earned a Roger Ailes gold star in movement conservatism during Obama’s Thursday presser with South Korea’s Myung-Bak : Fox News Chief White House Correspondent Ed Henry experienced a tense moment with President Obama during a Thursday press conference. The President held a joint press conference with Lee Myung-Bak, President of South Korea. Ed Henry had the first question of the conference and asked Obama if he considered the alleged Iranian assassination plot to be “an act of war.” Henry decided to quote a Mitt Romney statement from last week when asking for the President’s plans to address Iran’s alleged terror plot. Henry asked the President “what specific steps will you take to hold Iran accountable? Especially when Mitt Romney charged last week, quote, ‘If you do not want America to be the strongest nation on Earth, I am not your President. You have that president today.’” Obama paused and answered, “Well I did not know you were the spokesman for Romney,” and smiled down at Henry. Henry discussed the exchange with Megyn Kelly on her show and defended his decision to quote Mitt Romney in his question. “I was trying to put it in the broader context of not just Mitt Romney, but there are a lot of Republicans out there who would charge that this president leads from behind,” he said. “…Instead, he decided to go after me a little bit.” Henry has clashed repeatedly with Obama’s spokesman, Jay Carney. He went on and complained to Megyn Kelly. But shilling for Mitt Romney’s position on the situation and quoting him because he’s the Fox News preferred choice as GOP 2012 presidential challenger is pretty pathetic.

Continue reading …