No reports of deaths but from Manhattan to Washington DC, aeroplanes were grounded and offices evacuated As natural disasters go, it was hardly a catastrophe, but the earthquake felt across parts of America on Tuesday certainly had an impact. As buildings swayed from Manhattan to Detroit to Washington DC, aeroplanes were grounded and offices
Continue reading …Since Al Sharpton took over for Cenk Uygur in MSNBC's 6:00 time slot last month, he's been derided and ridiculed as a laughing stock totally unqualified to host a cable news program. Ironically, that makes him a perfect fit at this farce of a news outlet, and on Tuesday, the folks at MSNBC rewarded his incompetence by officially giving him his own show (press release via TV By The Numbers): REVEREND AL SHARPTON TO HOST “PoliticsNation” ON MSNBC Program to Air at 6 pm ET Weeknights Beginning August 29th NEW YORK – August 23, 2011 – Reverend Al Sharpton, the civil rights activist and minister, has been named host of “PoliticsNation,” a nightly program airing weeknights live at 6 p.m. ET on MSNBC. The announcement was made by Phil Griffin, President of MSNBC. “PoliticsNation” will debut on August 29. In his new role, Sharpton will lead a lively and informed discussion of the top headlines, bringing viewers his take on events in his signature style. “I’ve known Rev. Sharpton for over a decade and have tremendous respect for him. He has always been one of our most thoughtful and entertaining guests,” said Griffin. “I’m thrilled that he’s now reached a point in his career where he’s able to devote himself to hosting a nightly show. ‘PoliticsNation’ is going to be an incredibly strong kick-off to our evening schedule.” In addition to being a frequent guest on MSNBC throughout the network’s history, Rev. Sharpton has also served as an occasional guest host on several programs, most recently on “MSNBC Live at 6PM” and “The Ed Show.” He joins the network at a time where MSNBC has experienced tremendous ratings growth, consistently topping CNN in primetime programming. “I am very happy and honored to join the MSNBC team as we collectively try to get America to ’Lean Forward,’” said Sharpton. “It is a natural extension of my life work and growth. We all learn from our pain and stand up from our stumbling and one must either learn to lean forward or fall backwards. I'm glad they have given me the opportunity to continue my forward lean.” With over 40 years of experience as a community leader, politician, minister and advocate, the Rev. Al Sharpton is one of America’s most-renowned civil rights leaders. Sharpton’s highly visible career began at the tender age of four when he preached his first sermon. A successful civil rights career soon followed, helping Sharpton hold such notable positions as the Youth Director of New York’s Operation Breadbasket, Director of Ministers for National Rainbow Push coalition, and founder of his own broad-based progressive civil rights organization, the National Action Network (NAN), one of the leading civil rights organizations in the world. Since its inception in 1991, NAN has expanded to encompass chapters throughout the United States and maintain important regional offices in Washington, D.C.; Atlanta, GA; Detroit, MI; Chicago, IL; Dallas, TX; Las Vegas, NV; and Los Angeles, CA. Sharpton was a candidate for the Democratic nomination for President in 2004. Rev. Sharpton also hosts a nationally syndicated radio show that broadcasts in 40 markets, five days a week. He resides in New York and has two daughters, Dominique and Ashley. “PoliticsNation” will air weeknights from 6:00-7:00PM ET on MSNBC. Matthew Saal is Executive Producer. Brings a tear to your eye, doesn't it – especially when you take a gander at some of his recent displays of utter incompetence: Tea Partier to Sharpton: I Couldn't Listen to Any More of Your Insanity Without My Earpiece Falling Out Rev. Al Rips Paul Ryan $15 Fundraiser, Forgets Obama Raking In $38,500/Head Al Sharpton Falsely Accuses Well-Known Isolationist Pat Buchanan of Supporting Iraq War Apparent Teleprompter Failure Leaves Sharpton Flailing Tony Blankley Sarcastically Says to Rude and Dismissive Al Sharpton 'You Are a Very Polite Gentleman' Al Sharpton Rendered Inane During Tussle with GOP Congressman And that's just in the last month. As I said – he's a perfect fit. Readers are encouraged to review all of the hilarious NewsBusters pieces about Sharpton as well as videos at MRC-TV.
Continue reading …Apparently, when Rick Perry wrote his book Fed Up! Our Fight to Save America from Washington , he did not anticipate running for president. (As proof, see the passage where he explicitly states that he did not write the book “because I seek higher office.”) Now that he is running…
Continue reading …Baby No. 3 is on the way for Jennifer Garner and Ben Affleck, the couple announced yesterday. The two 39-year-olds, who wed in 2005, are already parents to Violet, 5, and Seraphina, 2, the AP notes. In a statement, they said they are “thrilled” to be welcoming a new member…
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum lashed out at Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) Monday, calling her “vile.” At a jobs summit at Inglewood High School Sunday, the congresswoman had said she wasn’t going to back down from her push for job-creation policies. “This is a tough game,” she explained. “You can’t be intimidated. You can’t be frightened. And as far as I’m concerned — the tea party can go straight to hell.” “She’s a caricature of what’s wrong with Congress,” Santorum told conservative radio host Steve Malzberg. “She’s vile. She’s always been that way, and she’s just one of these real, real nasty, you know, anti-basic traditional, fundamental values of this country.” “This is the left in America. They absolutely despise, you know, the founding principles of this country, that believes in free people, that believes in limited government. She is someone who believes she should control what’s going on in America, that she knows best, and that people that stand by constitutional principles of limited government are folks who are to be condemned.”
Continue reading …In two separate interviews of Republican presidential candidates, CNN's Piers Morgan exhibited an obvious contempt of Tea Party politics as well as a double standard toward moderate and conservative presidential candidates. In Monday's interview with Republican presidential candidate Jon Huntsman, CNN's Piers Morgan baited the moderate candidate to criticize the Tea Party for its unwavering defense of its principles. In contrast, Morgan used the same rhetoric the week before to put Tea Party champion Ron Paul on the defensive. [Video coming shortly.] Huntsman criticized the Tea Party on Monday for its refusal to compromise in the debt ceiling debate. Morgan set him up with plenty of ammunition. For instance he asked if Huntsman felt sympathy for his “friend” President Obama having to deal with the “intransigent” Tea Party faction of the GOP. “But if you're the Republican nominee, how are you going to control these Tea Party side of the GOP, because they are so intransigent,” Morgan later asked Huntsman. However, one week earlier Morgan pressed conservative presidential candidate Ron Paul over the same issues – only Paul had to defend himself from Morgan's criticism, rather than being able to criticize his political opponents. “Many people don't like your total intransigence over any tax increase,” Morgan confronted Paul, adding that “People don't like your intransigence over abortion.” The CNN host then challenged Paul, asking “are you prepared on some of these more extreme lines you have taken to soften, to moderate, to, in short, make yourself more electable?” In both interviews, Morgan pressed the candidates on social issues. While he questioned Ron Paul if he would “moderate” his opposition to abortion in cases of rape or incest, he asked Huntsman, who is okay with abortion in such cases, if he thought a stance like Paul's is “bordering on bigotry.” “When you see, again, intransigence by some of the – particularly the Tea Party end of the Republican party on this kind of thing, do you think again that it's bordering on bigotry?” he asked of Huntsman. A transcript of the segments is as follows: CNN PIERS MORGAN 8/15/2011 9:07 p.m. EDT PIERS MORGAN: (to Rep. Ron Paul (R-Tex.) Let me put this to you, Ron, because you're a charismatic guy. You did very well in this straw poll. It doesn't mean an awful lot. But it's an indicator that you have a popular vote there. You nearly won it. What I hear about you is very experienced, charismatic, people like you. But the thing that holds you back is when you stray into extremity. You know, they don't like the fact you're so completely opposed to any foreign aid. They don't like the fact you want to legalize heroin. Many people don't like your total intransigence over any tax increase, especially when you have someone like Warren Buffett saying, come on, hit the super rich harder. People don't like your intransigence over abortion, for example, where you don't believe even if someone is raped that they should be allowed an abortion. Are you prepared at this moment when everyone is wondering which way the Republicans are going to go – are you prepared on some of these more extreme lines you have taken to soften, to moderate, to, in short, make yourself more electable? CNN PIERS MORGAN 8/22/2011 9:40 p.m. EDT PIERS MORGAN: The problem though, as we saw over the battle over the debt ceiling, a very spurious battle many would argue, is that if the Tea Party got into actual government, there is a sense that they would just never compromise with anybody. And normal process of government, given you all have to compromise, becomes paralyzed – as we saw over the debt ceiling route. And the victim in all that is America and its economy, as we saw. JON HUNTSMAN, Republican presidential candidate: You've got to run the country at the end of the day. You've got to get out from our respective corners politically. And you've got to make a deal. You've got to make the country function. I was the only candidate who stood up on the debt ceiling debate and said this country shouldn't default. We should cut a deal that allows us not to – we're 25 percent of the world's GDP. MORGAN: So when you heard all the Tea Party candidates, to a man and woman, saying no compromise, presumably you think that is completely unacceptable. HUNTSMAN: I thought it was the height of irresponsibility. The height of irresponsibility. We're 25 percent of the world's GDP, the United States of America, that has never defaulted before, just let it go over a cliff. You can imagine what the marketplace would have done in response. The marketplace is trashing everybody right now. I mean, assets are under water, 401(k)s, retirement. You can only imagine what this country would look like today if we had defaulted. It was complete lunacy for people to even talk about that. MORGAN: Do you have sympathy for Barack Obama, who's been a friend of yours personally? Do you have sympathy for him in the position he found himself in, where you have such an intransigent part of the Republican Party really just refusing to compromise? HUNTSMAN: He appointed me and I stood up and took the appointment to serve my country. I love this country. You serve her. But in terms of any personal relationship, there's not a personal relationship. You know, you work for – you work for your President when you're asked to serve.
Continue reading …Season two of ‘Hair Battle Spectacular’ is underway on Oxygen, featuring host Eva Marcille and judge Derek J. Eleven of America’s hottest stylists compete to see who can deliver the most outlandish fantasy hairdo. (Aug. 23)
Continue reading …To borrow from a certain president's former preacher , the ” chickens are coming home to roost ” in Social Security's disability program. It's nearly bankrupt, and set to run out of cash by 2017. In the Associated Press's writeup (“Social Security disability on verge of insolvency”) of the situation occasioned by a congressional report repeating the obvious, Stephen Ohlemacher surprisingly and correctly retold a bit of the history which readers should find quite interesting, as it largely explains how the program got out of control (bold is mine): Congress tried to rein in the disability program in the late 1970s by making it tougher to qualify. The number of people receiving benefits declined for a few years, even during a recession in the early 1980s. Congress, however, reversed course and loosened the criteria, and the rolls were growing again by 1984. The disability program “got into trouble first because of liberalization of eligibility standards in the 1980s,” said Charles Blahous, one of the public trustees who oversee Social Security. “Then it got another shove into bigger trouble during the recent recession.” Today, about 13.6 million people receive disability benefits through Social Security or Supplemental Security Income. Those of us who were around and tried to pay attention during the early 1980s when a very few entities (The New York Times, the Washington Post, CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, and three or four wire services) had a virtual stranglehold on national news coverage were led to believe that it was the evil, mean, heartless, cruel, unfeeling, uncaring Reagan administration which on its own initiative was solely responsible for its attempt to trim the disability rolls of people who did not qualify. As Ohlemacher indicates, what really happened was that Team Reagan — silly them — was trying to implement a law which a firmly Democrat-controlled Congress (58-42 in the Senate and 277-158 in the House during 1979-1980 ) had passed during the final years of Jimmy Carter's presidency. This is reinforced in a 1992 New York Times item covering a government agreement to reopen over New York State-based cases involving over 200,000 claims (not kidding) involving 1980s disability denials, wherein the Times's Robert Pear chose to do a virtual victory dance in print — and used a Bush 41 slogan to do it (bolds and numbered tags are mine): U.S. TO RECONSIDER DENIAL OF BENEFITS TO MANY DISABLED Reversing one of the most widely criticized policies of the Reagan Administration [1], Federal officials have agreed to reopen tens of thousands of cases in which the Government denied benefits to people who said they could not work because of mental or physical disabilities. …
Continue reading …