Home » Posts tagged with » america (Page 224)
WikiLeaks Exposes the Danger of Pakistan’s Nukes

By Fred Branfman There are few scenarios more frightening for America than a domestic nuclear terrorist attack. We now know that U.S. policy is actually increasing the danger of a nuclear incident. Related Entries January 13, 2011 President Obama: ‘Our Hearts Are Broken’ January 12, 2011 How Violent Talk Blocks Sane Gun Laws

Continue reading …
Emotional Obama Urges Americans to Heal

President Barack Obama appealed for civility at a Wednesday memorial service for those attacked in the Arizona shooting rampage and implored a divided America to honor them by becoming a better country. (Jan. 12)

Continue reading …
Prayer and Mourning in Haiti a Year After Quake

Haiti’s capital turned quiet Wednesday as prayer services marked the anniversary of the country’s worst natural disaster in history. John Mone reports. (Jan. 12)

Continue reading …
I Blame Jared Lee Loughner

The man who should burn for the crimes of Jared Lee Loughner is Jared Lee Loughner. Not Rush Limbaugh, who said yesterday that Democrats are supporting the man who shot a Democratic congresswoman in the head: “What Mr. Loughner knows is that he has the full support of a major political party in this country. He’s sitting there in jail. He knows what’s going on, he knows that… the Democrat party is attempting to find anybody but him to blame . He knows if he plays his cards right, he’s just a victim. He’s the latest in a never-ending parade of victims brought about by the unfairness of America …this guy clearly understands he’s getting all the attention and he understands he’s got a political party doing everything it can , plus a local sheriff doing everything that they can to make sure he’s not convicted of murder – but something lesser.” Methinks the demagogue doth protest too much. Indeed, I was impressed by the rapid reaction of tea party mouthpieces and conservative talking heads to Saturday morning’s shooting, as well as the constant refrain of victimhood by the right — as if the whole world is painting the blood on their innocent hands. Sales of the gun Loughner used have skyrocketed ; “get one while you still can” is not just a tagline on gun show billboards, it’s literally a call to arms in anticipation of a crackdown on freedom. Democrats, who will probably not see any real gun control legislation out of the tragedy, have nonetheless been accused of exploiting it since about midday Saturday. In practice, of course, the president has made no attempt to round up Glocks and no one has offered First Amendment-killing legislation aimed at the tea party, but why let facts get in the way of paranoid belief-systems? Besides, the whole point of culture wars is that they be continuous, not that they have any basis in fact. In the paranoid universe, it’s okay if Emanuel Goldstein isn’t real. I know, I know. Markos reacted almost immediately to the shooting by tweeting Sarah Palin about a “mission accomplished,” unfairly blaming Sarah Palin. But she’s not responsible for Loughner’s trigger-happy atrocity. Those target crosshairs surveyor’s symbols weren’t to blame, either, just as the birther-racist asshat-apocalypse nut coalition that turned out for Palin’s 2008 rallies and became the 2009 tea party does not mean Palin is responsible for the tea party’s existence. Like the rest of us, Loughner was swimming in a tide of tea for at least the last two years while his evident paranoia grew. Indeed, the tea party began as a libertarian Ron Paul phenomenon into which K-Street poured gobs of cash, and Loughner is evidently anarcho-libertarian . Our just-ended cycle saw the fringe come mainstream; Loughner is a fringe character responding to his times, but he pulled the trigger on his own, planned the attack ahead of time, and knew exactly what he was doing. He will burn for it according to Arizona law, and I doubt the state will settle for lesser charges. No one — not Palin, not Limbaugh, not Beck — can or should share the dock with him. They did not pull the trigger, after all, much as they didn’t directly cause the seventeen incidents of right-wing violence since Obama’s election . The bikers who intimidated Democratic staffers at Allen West’s rallies and the Rand Paul campaign donor who stomped on Lauren Valle’s head were not taking orders from their candidates, either. As far as legal responsibility goes, Rush is blameless — and knows it. He’s defending something else: his conspiracy theory is a rationalization for listeners to excuse the violence he instills in their minds. Remember, this is the same political movement that said comic books caused crime, insisted backwards lyrics and role-playing games caused murder-suicide, and still worries that reading a Qur’an makes you into a suicide bomber. They admit no connection between their rhetoric and the permissive atmosphere of paranoid, armed reaction they created with their own words. The party of responsibility is denying responsibility not for Loughner, but for their own words , as if words suddenly have no effect on people. When we struggle to say what’s on our minds, we’re at the beginning of language. Thought precedes word or deed, and word usually precedes deed. Words have power; repeated often enough, they become real on their own. In fact, Limbaugh’s entire career has consisted of torturing words until they have only the meaning he wants for them — witness his regular mistreatment of the word “liberal,” for instance. Which brings me to Roger Ailes : I told all of our guys, shut up, tone it down, make your argument intellectually. You don’t have to do it with bombast . I hope the other side does that. If only the leading lights of the right had heard such sage advice two years ago! But then, they have so little intellectual credibility anymore. Why else would so much right-wing communication have turned to the desperate language of last stands, hate, and militant confrontation? Bombast is all they have left. There will be more Jared Lee Loughners because they cannot help themselves. Their industry exists to pollute the airwaves with cancerous lies; I hold them responsible for Loughner’s lymphoma, not his trigger finger.

Continue reading …
What Is the Meaning of This ‘Blood Libel’?

Wouldn’t you know it—the Sarah Palin Catchphrase Generator clicked, whirred and spat out another viscerally tinged and menacing two-word combination to righteously apply to her political opponents. This week’s winner: “blood libel.” But what does it mean ? The BBC breaks it down, and, in news that shouldn’t surprise many, the term comes equipped with loaded religious undertones and the capacity to divide and offend.

Continue reading …
Bozell Column: Liberal Sickos Exploit a Rampage

Imagine the Saturday morning of congressional aide Mark Kimble. Kimble told of going to a Safeway for a typical meet-and-greet event with his boss, Rep. Gabrielle Giffords. Kimble said he went into the store for coffee, and as he came out, Giffords was talking to a couple about Medicare and reimbursements, and federal judge John Roll had just walked up to her and shouted “Hi” – when a gunman opened fire. Nobody in America should greet this scene with any other initial reaction than horror. Six people were killed, including Judge Roll, several retirees, and a nine-year-old girl. Over a dozen others were seriously injured in the carnage. Giffords was shot in the head and remains in critical condition. Sadly, shamefully, within just minutes, a nasty political spin was kicking in without any brake for decency or evidence. Conservatives were to blame. read more

Continue reading …
Bill O’Reilly’s ‘Bloody Shirt’ Factor: How to turn perpetrators into victims

Click here to view this media Bill O’Reilly was in rare form last night as he was simply outraged from all the criticism that was heaped on the RWNM after the Giffords shootings. And the extreme right wing rhetoric tha t Paul Krugman talked about in his piece was directed at poor l’il BillO. So Paul, be afraid — you’ll never be forgiven for writing this: And there’s a huge contrast in the media. Listen to Rachel Maddow or Keith Olbermann, and you’ll hear a lot of caustic remarks and mockery aimed at Republicans. But you won’t hear jokes about shooting government officials or beheading a journalist at The Washington Post. Listen to Glenn Beck or Bill O’Reilly, and you will. Of course, the likes of Mr. Beck and Mr. O’Reilly are responding to popular demand. Citizens of other democracies may marvel at the American psyche, at the way efforts by mildly liberal presidents to expand health coverage are met with cries of tyranny and talk of armed resistance. Still, that’s what happens whenever a Democrat occupies the White House, and there’s a market for anyone willing to stoke that anger. But even if hate is what many want to hear, that doesn’t excuse those who pander to that desire. They should be shunned by all decent people. This was too much for BillO, who complained last night that Krugman did the most damage of anyone over the weekend, and then devoted almost a full hour standing on his soapbox and whining away. Click here to view this media Paid stooge Juan Williams was there to back him up as were almost every other guest he had on. Bernie Goldberg was furious too. Hey, how many people used Keith Olbermann’s book to go out and murder people, Bernie? None of course, but I guess he forgot about Jim David Adkisson, who murdered two people in a Knoxville church after reading Bernie’s book. The manifesto he composed before his murderous rampage was just released; you can read the whole thing here [pdf file], and it’s worth reading in its entirety for a number of reasons. But I especially took note of Part III: This was a symbolic killing. Who I wanted to kill was every Democrat in the Senate & House, the 100 people in Bernard Goldberg’s book. I’d like to kill everyone in the mainstream media. But I know those people were inaccessible to me. I couldn’t get to the generals & high ranking officers of the Marxist movement so I went after the foot soldiers, the chickenshit liberals that vote in these traitorous people. Someone had to get the ball rolling. I volunteered. I hope others do the same. It’s the only way we can rid America of this cancerous pestilence. That seems to sum up Adkisson’s thinking: He wanted to be the spark in a wave of similar fed-up-niks taking their anger out on liberals. I guess Bernie and BillO simply forgot to mention that violent episode. O’Reilly even went as far as to say that MSNBC is far worse than anything on right wing talk radio even though there are a few kooks and he needs body guards to protect himself from the network because they attack him so much. Fox always uses their ratings to try and prove how right they are about everything. You see, we have good ratings so we can’t be fermenting hate. Riiiight. I was interviewed on Al-JazeeraTV Sunday night and the host asked me how the Right would react on Monday. I said that they would never take any responsibility for their words and in the end blame the Left , just as they have always done. In fact, this was a classic case of the Right complaining that their critics were “waving the bloody shirt” — an act they perfected after the Civil War and have been rinsing and repeating ever since, whenever anyone has tried to hold them accountable for the violence they foster. As Dave explained awhile back : To Bill O’Reilly and Juan Williams and the rest of the Fox crew, the outrage is never the atrocities they actually uttered, only the effrontery of having those atrocities held against them. They all want to make a victim of the bully and a bully of the victim. Their narrative is that the real story is not the atrocities that Rush Limbaugh utters but only the attempt by his political enemies to make political hay out of it. But then, they’re working out of a long and storied tradition when they do.

Continue reading …
Beck claims ‘I don’t use [violent rhetoric] on or off the air’: Oh really?

Click here to view this media It sure seemed that everyone — and I mean EVERYONE — at Fox News was focused yesterday on beating down the horrifying idea that somehow Fox News’ incendiary rhetoric might have played a significant role in fomenting Saturday’s horrifying tragedy in Arizona. Of course, Glenn Beck — being one of the chief purveyors of said incendiary rhetoric — was out there leading the attack, devoting his entire hour to his newfound desire to prevent political violence. Indeed, he iussed a “letter to America” yesterday containing a pledge he wants everyone else to sign decrying any attempt to connect political violence to the rhetoric that precedes it: I hold those responsible for the violence, responsible for the violence. I denounce those who attempt to blame political opponents for the acts of madmen. In other words: I denounce people who would like to blame me for inspiring guys like Byron Williams, who openly credit me for inspiring them! On his show, he responded to the critics — especially those like David Brock at Media Matters, who demanded Rupert Murdoch take responsibility for this outcome: “You have the power to order them to stop using violent rhetoric, on and off of Fox’s air. If they fail to do so, it is incumbent upon you to fire them or be responsible for the climate they create and any consequences thereof.” Beck’s response: Beck: Well, I don’t use it on or off the air, so I guess I’m in compliance, Media Matters. Well, as Eric Boehlert has amply documented, this is simply a brazen lie: Beck has used violent rhetoric since nearly the first day he joined Fox News, and it has built and amplified since then. Indeed, he uses two particular kinds of violent rhetoric in abundance. The first is eliminationist rhetoric , particularly the kind aimed at progressives: Click here to view this media Here you can see Beck call progressives a “cancer” (multiple times), “the disease that’s killing us,” a “virus,” a “parasite,” “vampires” who will “suck the life out” of the Democratic Party, and claim that progressives intend the “destruction of the Constitution” and will strike it a “death blow”. Then there’s the fearmongering rhetoric he uses to demonize his opponents: Click here to view this media This kind of talk even earned him the sobriquet “Fearmonger in Chief” from the ADL . Hey Glenn! Here’s something you could add to your “pledge”: “I choose not to hold my political opponents up for dehumanization and demonization in a way that makes them the object of fear and loathing and a target for violent elimination.” You take that pledge, and we might listen.

Continue reading …

We all know that everyone wants to live in a city that is affordable but accommodating. Based on the data from Altos Research, a San Fransisco-based real estate research firm. Here is the 5 most affordable cities in America. Short preview of Omaha Stakes As the home of major corporations like Union Pacific, ConAgra Foods and Most affordable cities in America as of January 2011 is a post from: Daily World Buzz

Continue reading …
Biden: US Won’t Cut and Run From Afghanistan

Vice President Joe Biden said Tuesday that America will not cut and run in 2014, when the US-led military coalition plans to hand over control of security to Afghan forces. (Jan. 11)

Continue reading …