
James Franco, Geoffrey Rush and Nicole Kidman were full of jokes at a luncheon held for Oscar nominees on Monday in Beverly Hills, Calif. (Feb. 8)
Continue reading …

Click here to view this media [H/t commenter Mugsy ] It was pretty hard this weekend to find anything but warm, gushing encomiums to Ronald Reagan on his 100th birthday anywhere on the teevee — particularly at Fox, where the fawning coverage doubled as an opportunity to bash President Obama . The one exception was this brief report from ABC News’ Jake Tapper. While far from complete, it at least covers some of the more significant differences between the real president that Ronald Reagan was and the fake myths about him that have become enmeshed in right-wing conventional wisdom since — and thus embedded as truth for mainstream media. But really, this only points to the larger truth about this whole weekend’s worth of praise for Reagan, which included a special halftime program at the Super Bowl, fergawdsake. As Charles Pierce adroitly observes : By way of historical comparison, the centennial of Franklin D. Roosevelt’s birth took place in 1982. The halftime entertainment at that year’s Super Bowl — the telecast not yet having been blown up to 96.5 hours — consisted of Up With People singing a medley of Motown hits. Somewhere between those two events is something that says a great deal about this nation, not much of it encouraging. Maybe the NFLPA should change its acronym to PATCO and eliminate all confusion. Much as Reagan himself was during his presidency, his image is now functionally just a stand-in for conservative-movement ideology. Whatever conservatives need him to be now, that’s what the Reagan Myth stands for — even though, as Jon Perr points out, today’s Tea Partiers would call Reagan a RINO. And that’s why, as Will Bunch explores at length in his great book, Tear Down This Myth , there has evolved in fact a cottage industry around the mythologization of Ronald Reagan — naming airports and boulevards and buildings after him, constantly burnishing his achievements, constantly celebrating various Reagan anniversaries, including slightly odd ones like his 100th birthday. This industry exists not to much to celebrate Reagan the actual president, but to embed conservative mythology in the nation’s political landscape — even after its disastrous consequences are made manifest: There has always been a place for mythology in American democracy – the hulking granite edifices of the Capitol Mall in Washington are a powerful testament to that – but this nation has arguably never seen the kind of bold, crudely calculated and ideologically driven legend-manufacturing as has taken place with Ronald Reagan. It is a myth machine that has been spectacularly successful, launched in the mid-1990s when the conservative brand was at low ebb.The docudrama version of the Gipper’s life story, successfully sold to the American public, helped to keep united and refuel a right-wing movement that consolidated power while citing Reaganism – as separate and apart from the flesh-and-blood Reagan – for misguided policies from lowering taxes in the time of war in Iraq to maintaining that unpopular conflict in a time of increasing bloodshed and questionable gains. As Bunch recently observed , in recalling the way the so-called liberal media attended to Reagan’s funeral on bended knee: The death of Reagan some six-and-a-half years ago, and the remarkable tenor – not to mention the depth — of the news coverage, especially on cable TV news channels, marked something of a turning point. It showed the extent to which a vast content-hungry media world – much more extensive than when Reagan was president in the 1980s, when their main concern was the half-hour evening network newscast — was eager to swallow the manufactured myths about Ronald Reagan, and thus honor what the unnamed TV executive told Hoagland, that “today history is what we say it is.” Any chance for an honest portrayal of Reagan and his presidency – the dangerous overreach of the Iran-contra scandal, the growing embrace of deficit spending (both in Washington and for credit-card-laden consumers), or even the positive idea that his greatest contribution to history was a heartfelt desire to rid the world of nuclear weapons (an idea out of step with modern conservative thinking) – has been tossed down the memory hole for the last decade. What the American people have been news-fed instead has been an ideology loosely based on Reagan, called Reaganism – a notion that has led to the Tea Party’s hatred of anything involving government and the bogus ideas that taxes can only be cut or that diplomacy with America’s rivals is for wimps. With each passing election, more and more of the electorate is too young to have remembered or experienced the real Ronald Reagan, yet are searching for an idealized president based on these right-wing perpetrated fallacies. Many of the worst aspects of the George W. Bush presidency – more tax cuts for the rich, soaring deficits, and “axis of evil” bluster – were rooted in this legend of a man who wasn’t there. My own recollection of Reagan was that he destroyed the Republican Party for moderate Republicans such as I was at the time, especially by empowering the Religious Right. It drove people like me out of the GOP, and we’ve never looked back.
Continue reading …
Barack Obama extended the olive branch to the US Chamber of Commerce today, pledging to work to expand trade opportunities and cut away burdensome regulations. But he also took a page out of JFK’s book, telling executives to “ask yourselves what you can do for America,” according to NPR . “Now…
Continue reading …

Al-Jazeera English is enjoying new-found global popularity in the wake of the chaos in Egypt Donald Rumsfeld demonised it and George Bush allegedly said he wanted to bomb it . No one was quite sure whether the then White House incumbent was joking or not, but its offices have been hit by US forces. Twice . Now something rather strange has begun to happen to the Arabic language news broadcaster al-Jazeera and the English language channel it launched nearly five years ago; American viewers have begun to demand it. It is clear some kind of watershed has been reached when the Kansas City Star publishes a cut-out-and-keep guide to the “easiest way to get al-Jazeera English” . The Qatar-based channel’s acclaimed coverage of the Egyptian crisis has been referred to as the broadcaster’s “CNN moment”, doing for al-Jazeera English what the first Gulf war did for CNN, pushing it to the forefront of the public’s consciousness. Put simply, must-see TV. Now the challenge is to translate the plaudits into the major cable or satellite distribution deal the channel has long sought without success in the US. The New York Times, which praised the channel’s “total immersion coverage of news events the whole world is talking about”, bemoaned the fact that US cable viewers were able to watch MTV’s controversial adaptation of E4′s teen drama Skins but not al-Jazeera English. “It seems like a perverse application of free speech,” said the paper . “But sex is sexier than foreign affairs and it certainly sells better.” Intimidation and violence With China investing $7bn in foreign language media , we may also be witnessing the beginning of a shift, albeit slight, in the nature of global TV news and debate. Stephen Claypole, the former senior BBC News and TV news agency executive who is now chairman of the London and Abu Dhabi-based consultancy, DMA Media , says: “Al-Jazeera has the game by the throat, both in Arabic and English, and it has certainly lived up to its reputation as the most watched broadcaster in the Arab world in spite of intimidation and violence against its staff in Egypt. “I have heard that [US secretary of state] Hillary Clinton [pictured] watches it constantly and that Barack Obama has been viewing from the situation room. Although al-Jazeera English has been competent since its launch, it has been waiting for a huge story to call its own. Egypt is certainly that,” Claypole adds. Al-Jazeera English is separate from the main al-Jazeera Arabic channel, which began broadcasting in 1996. Staffed largely by western TV journalists, the English-language service leveraged the advantages of its Arabic network and contacts in covering the emerging crisis. For a story of this scale in the Arab world, it absolutely had to be good. Al Anstey, the former ITN executive who is the managing director of al-Jazeera English, describes it as an “extraordinary week” for the channel and a “truly historical” one for Egypt. “We are being seen worldwide as a channel of reference on this story,” says Anstey. “There has been an exponential increase in the recognition of exactly what it is we do and the quality of our journalism and content. I always say the best way of addressing any misconceptions about al-Jazeera English is to switch on and watch.” Al-Jazeera English is available in around 220m homes in more than 100 countries worldwide, including viewers with Freeview, Sky or Freesat in the UK. But fewer than 3m of those homes are in the US including – helpfully for the White House – Washington DC. The failure to strike a major US distribution deal is partly a result of the political sensitivity that surrounded the perceived negative slant of al-Jazeera Arabic’s coverage of the Iraq war. It is also a reflection of the fact that cable operators do not think they can make money from a foreign news network on systems that are already full. BBC World News is distributed to around 6m homes in the US, against more than 10 times that for the entertainment channel BBC America (on which some World News bulletins air). “For a long time al-Jazeera was seen as the Fox [News] for the bad guys — that’s a really unfortunate way of looking at it,” says Jon Williams, the BBC’s World News editor. “With the change of [US government] administration there’s been a slight change of attitude, and if this means that it does now get carriage in the US, then we welcome that. Al-Jazeera has done some great stuff … It wouldn’t be fair to single out its Egyptian coverage – it has been doing this for a while.” US viewers have been watching the channel by other means – streamed live on YouTube, on set-top box digital video player Roku and on its own website, which reported a traffic increase of 2,500%, with more than half of the upsurge coming from the US. It also gained a valuable window on Link TV, which announced last week it would simulcast around 12 hours a day of al-Jazeera English on its satellite network available nationally on DirecTV and the Dish Network. Blogger and journalism professor Jeff Jarvis said it was a “sad vestige of the era of ‘Freedom Fries’ that the channel was not more widely available on cable, and started a Twitter campaign, #wewantouraje (referencing the line from Dire Straits’ Money For Nothing, but with a twist). “As much of an internet triumphalist as I am, internet streaming is not going to have the same impact — political and education impact — that putting AJE on the cable dial would have,” blogged Jarvis. “It is downright un-American to still refuse to carry it. Vital, world-changing news is occurring in the Middle East and no one — not the xenophobic or celebrity-obsessed or cut-to-the-bone American media — can bring the perspective, insight, and on-the-scene reporting al-Jazeera English can.” Anstey is cautiously optimistic: “I’m confident we will get distribution in the US, it’s just a question of when,” he says. “It’s a very important marketplace for us.” Especially in terms of revenue? “It’s not about the finances of getting into America, it’s about getting the content out there. At this stage of our evolution, the priority for the English channel is about building reputation and reach.” As the broadcaster is bankrolled by the billionaire Emir of Qatar , neither the English nor the Arabic al-Jazeera is under pressure to make a profit any time soon. It has also faced accusations of aligning itself closely to Qatari foreign policy; US embassy cables released by WikiLeaks at the end of last year suggested Qatar was using the Arabic channel as a bargaining chip in foreign policy negotiations with its neighbours. “Never once has Qatar interfered with our editorial,” says Anstey. “It is absolutely not a fair criticism and I can say that with total confidence. We are genuinely independent.” The English channel’s short history has not been without its problems — the launch was delayed and allegations of discontent among the ranks surfaced three years ago, accompanied by a string of staff defections . Anstey, the station’s former director of media development who was appointed managing director in October, says: “As a startup, where your competitors are very established and very good at what they do, there is going to be rapid evolution. We have gone into the next stage of development and things are much more settled. We are able to refine what we do and expand where we feel appropriate.” As the al-Jazeera channel eyes up further international expansion, funded by its backer’s seemingly bottomless pockets, western news organisations such as the BBC’s World Service are having to sharply cut back , with its shortwave Egyptian service among those facing the axe. Richard Sambrook, the former director of BBC Global News and now global vice-chairman of the PR firm Edelman , says it is part of a wider trend which could have far-reaching implications. “Western journalism and newsgathering, including the international networks, is shrinking as news organisations close bureaux and make staff redundant to cut costs. At the same time, states in other parts of the world are investing in journalism including international coverage and networks — al-Jazeera, Iran’s Press TV … and the Chinese have just invested $7bn in expanding [state news agency] Xinhua and CCTV [China Central Television]. So we may be seeing a shift from western dominated international news to Mid East and Asian dominance in the long run.” Every global media story produces its winners. Egypt’s drawn-out agony is a tailor-made opportunity for al-Jazeera English, which it has seized with careful on-the-ground journalism. If the US cable owners relent to the emerging public pressure, it will mark a coup for a news service that, until recently, was battling to prove it had credibility and salience with many Western audiences. Al-Jazeera TV news Television industry Egypt Protest Middle East John Plunkett Josh Halliday guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …

Amid an excellent performance by Aaron Rodgers and a noble failure by Troy Polamalu’s hair, Madison Avenue and corporate America combined to spend $100,000 per second on Super Bowl ads. Because a love of Doritos and pugs can only take… Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : Pop & Hiss Discovery Date : 07/02/2011 01:10 Number of articles : 5
Continue reading …

We saw it teased right around 48 hours ago, and now Motorola’s full Xoom Super Bowl ad is out and about for the world to see. It aired just moments ago during Super Bowl XLV , and it’s fairly obvious where it took inspiration . It’s easily one of the best tech spots we’ve seen in quite some while, and as much as Motorola has been hyping its Honeycomb-based superslate , we’d say it better sell quite a few to recoup what it’s already lost in marketing — even at $800 a pop , it’ll still take a boatload. The real question, however, is this: will today’s America even get it ? Hop on past the break and mash play if you missed out. P.S. – Missed our coverage of Super Bowl Media Day? Catch up here ! Continue reading Motorola’s Xoom Super Bowl commercial tips hat to Apple’s ’1984′ spot (video) Motorola’s Xoom Super Bowl commercial tips hat to Apple’s ’1984′ spot (video) originally appeared on Engadget on Sun, 06 Feb 2011 19:38:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink
Continue reading …

enlarge Credit: The Chocolate Swirl Football, food, million dollar commercials. Who are you rooting for? What’s the best play of the game? Kickoff is at 6:30 pm Eastern / 3:30 Pacific. Also, Blue America has a Super Bowl game going on. Everytime The Packers score, donate to the Blue America fund to help get rid of Wisconsin’s biggest disgrace: Paul Ryan. Football open thread, Super Bowl 2011 Steelers 31% (4 votes) Packers 69% (9 votes) 13 votes
Continue reading …

Click here to view this media There’s something more than a little off-putting about someone once described as America’s “most peripatetic civil liberties lawyer and one of its most distinguished defenders of individual rights,” arguing vigorously against those same rights of free expression and self-determination for another people. That he does so later by invoking Godwin’s law when he states as a fear of democracy emerging in Egypt with “The people of Germany chose Adolph Hitler in 1932 by democratic means” is just sickening. [And historically false anyway, as Hindenburg won the 1932 German election .] Dershowitz’s false equivalence of sacrificing America’s “only reliable ally in the middle east” for one who would never be more than a “fairweather friend” is an embarrassing straw man argument where he points as one thing only as possible, or at least likely, as a given result. That somehow supporting Egypt’s move towards real democracy would always be antithetical to our and Israel’s goals. Mona Eltahawy was blunt in her assessment of the manure Dershowitz was spewing, calling him “hypocritical and alarmist”. “You’re talking nonsense,” she said. David Gergen was given the last word which he used to back up Dershowitz’s call to maintain the status quo as in the best interests of the United States, stability above all else, and especially not the messy and unpredictable nature of democracy. Dershowitz nodded approvingly, content in his own sanctimony.
Continue reading …

Photo: Colros We’ve accepted that America is the fattest nation in the world . I mean three out of four Americans are projected to be overweight or obese within 10 years. Before 1980, only one in ten Americans was overweight. But it seems that a tiny Pacific island nation has quickly come from behind and may actually take the cake or the French fry for that matter. Is America being surpassed by Nauru? … Read the full story on TreeHugger
Continue reading …