WATCH Lindsey Vonn Retains World Cup Super-Combined Title RCH_US Ski Damen Empng Kaprun_04012010.mpg Lindsey Vonn – Get to Know America’s Girl
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Michele Bachmann of course refused to walk back her comments that the Obama administration is a “gangster government” on Meet the Press this week, but as Steve Benen noted , she also seems to have a great deal of trouble with any consistency to this argument. Of course not. Bachmann started using this line nearly two years ago — it never really caught on with anyone else — so she obviously isn’t prepared to walk it back. Indeed, it’s part of a larger case the hysterical right-wing lawmaker has pushed repeatedly: this White House reminds her of an organized crime syndicate, using ruthless, Chicago-style hardball tactics intended to intimidate anyone who gets in the president’s way. It’s absurd, but it’s a picture Bachmann has tried to paint. What’s interesting, though, is that Bachmann has also made the exact opposite argument , just as often. Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) launched a verbal assault on President Obama this weekend, claiming that his foreign policy stance was so weak that it made “Jimmy Carter look like a Rambo tough-guy.” I can see one argument or the other, but both at the same time? President Obama, we’re told, is both too tough and too weak. He’s overly aggressive and overly passive. He’s a ruthless mobster and a feeble pushover. Is it too much to ask that right-wing personalities pick one or the other? They can’t both be true. He’s correct but consistency and telling the truth aren’t exactly Michele Bachmann’s strong points, are they? As long as she’s never punished by the electorate for her nonsense, she’s got no reason to stop. Transcript below the fold. GREGORY: Let me ask you about 2012. There’s talk that you’re considering a run for the presidency. And I wonder what you make of how people react to you. A lot of people think that you are an extremist, somebody who, you know, as you’ve done in the past, called the administration “a gangster government,” is far more interested in fueling anger than becoming something of a consensus politician who can attract widespread support. How do you react to all that? BACHMANN: I haven’t made a decision either way about plans for 2012. What my concern is, is that our country move forward and that we regain a sound financial footing. I don’t believe that Barack Obama has done a good job as president of the United States. I think that’s beared out statistically on everything from anemic job creation to the out of control spending and deficits. The economy is simply not improving. Just consider, the day before the president took office gasoline was $1.83 a gallon. There are places today in the United States where it is over $4 a gallon. It didn’t help that the president had the Interior secretary cancel 77 oil leases as soon as the president came into power. We can do so much better. And that’s what I’m talking about with people in the next few months. We need to think very strongly–a second administration of Jimmy Carter wouldn’t have done this country any favors. We need to make sure we don’t have a second Barack Obama administration. GREGORY: You’ve referred to the Obama administration as a gangster government. You’ve said that this President has anti-American views. Do you believe that still? BACHMANN: I believe that the actions of this government have– have– been emblematic of ones that have not been based on true American values. Just consider Obama Care. Over 900 waivers have been given out to unions and protected special interests that are linked to the president. GREGORY: Is it appropriate to refer to the government as a gangster government and to question whether this President loves America? BACHMANN: Well, I said I do believe that actions that have been taken by this White House, I don’t take back my statement on gangster government. I think that there have been– actions that have been taken by this government that I think are corrupt– GREGORY: And you think the President has anti-American views? BACHMANN: Well, it– I’ve already answered that question before. I said I had very serious concerns about the President’s views. And I think the President’s actions in the last two years speak for themselves.
Continue reading …New York Times columnist Paul Krugman doesn't believe education is the key to solving America's economic woes. Quite the contrary, in his recent article ” Degrees and Dollars ,” the Nobel Laureate argued that the path to a more prosperous nation is for unions to have increased bargaining power and for everyone to have “free” healthcare: It is a truth universally acknowledged that education is the key to economic success. Everyone knows that the jobs of the future will require ever higher levels of skill. That’s why, in an appearance Friday with former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, President Obama declared that “If we want more good news on the jobs front then we’ve got to make more investments in education.” But what everyone knows is wrong. Krugman then laid out the major flaw in this premise: technological advancements are diminishing the value of education. With each new piece of software being created, some workers are becoming obsolete: [A]ny routine task — a category that includes many white-collar, nonmanual jobs — is in the firing line. Conversely, jobs that can’t be carried out by following explicit rules — a category that includes many kinds of manual labor, from truck drivers to janitors — will tend to grow even in the face of technological progress. And here’s the thing: Most of the manual labor still being done in our economy seems to be of the kind that’s hard to automate. Notably, with production workers in manufacturing down to about 6 percent of U.S. employment, there aren’t many assembly-line jobs left to lose. Meanwhile, quite a lot of white-collar work currently carried out by well-educated, relatively well-paid workers may soon be computerized. So, technology, in Krugman's view, is destroying the marketplace for well-educated, well-paid, white-collar jobs. The problem is what's left won't be able to make enough money to really prosper. But Krugman has a solution: We need to restore the bargaining power that labor has lost over the last 30 years, so that ordinary workers as well as superstars have the power to bargain for good wages. We need to guarantee the essentials, above all health care, to every citizen. The end of that first sentence deserves repeating: “so that ordinary workers as well as superstars have the power to bargain for good wages.” And therein lies the real truth. Folks like Krugman aren't interested in prosperity. Frankly, they loathe it. Instead, they want to make sure that the less-skilled in our society make as much as the “superstars.” This is why they advocate unions and shun things such as merit increases and employee evaluations. People making more money because they work harder offend folks like Krugman as does the idea that “ordinary workers” might be terminated for below average performance. “From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.” That's what Karl Marx wrote in his infamous “Critique of the Gotha Program,” and Krugman couldn't agree more. Scarier still is that this is how most of the media think as well as today's Democrat Party and White House resident. This should tell you why the Left have made Wisconsin a battleground, for the preservation and expansion of unions is the next step in “solving” our economic problems after forcing ObamaCare down the throats of the citizenry. And they wonder why a movement has formed to take back America.
Continue reading …March Madness Tangle Teezer PJ Giveaway Winners Revealed!!! CELEBRITY APPRENTICE APPEARS TONIGHT!!!! NENE LEAKES On Celebrity Apprentice Was A Set-Up??? {Sha’Nigga Bangkok} ' Celebrity Apprentice ' Cast Parties in Vegas Pre-Premiere – OK … The latest season of Celebrity Apprentice is ready to go! Some of the new, excited cast members came out to Las Vegas to celebrate their upcoming series 201103. ' Celebrity Apprentice ' Live Blog Party Tonight! Who’ll be next “ Celebrity Apprentice ?” Or, better yet, will the already-heard-about clashes between reality show diva NeNe Leakes and all-around diva Star Jones attract their fans (and detractors) as viewers? … ' Celebrity Apprentice's ' NeNe Leakes on hurtful press: 'I have … The new “ Celebrity Apprentice ” is bound to generate more headlines this season — good and bad. She tells us how she handles the bad ones. Celebrity Apprentice A new show debuts on NBC Sunday night while Celebrity Apprentice returns with an all new season. Starting at 7:00pm, catch NBC’s new show America’s … PARTY FAB: The ” Celebrity Apprentice ” Season Premiere Cast Party … PARTY FAB: The “ Celebrity Apprentice ” Season Premiere Cast Party. Mar 06 | by _YBF. Stars of the latest season of “ Celebrity Apprentice ” celebrated its season premiere last night at Surrender Nightclub at Encore in Las Vegas. … MissieBird says: I am watching The Celebrity Apprentice http://bit.ly/i7pbbt (via @GetGlue ) #TheCelebrityApprentice
Continue reading …Sarah Palin famously announced her debate strategy when she told Gwen Ifill that she only going to answer questions she wanted to answer during the Vice Presidential Debate in 2008: And I may not answer the questions that either the moderator or you want to hear…. It appears Michele Bachmann has decided that whatever worked for Palin should work for her. She for the most part ignored or didn’t answer Gregory’s questions on MTP. She did come prepared with a visual aid however, a little hand held sign which had 105,464,000,000 written on it, signifying the $105 billion she claimed was “hidden” in the “Obamacare” legislation to fund the program. So she thinks that legislation shouldn’t include how it would be funded ? If not, what exactly were the Republicans threatening to defund ? Undeterred by details, she immediately and proudly held up her prop for Gregory and the viewers to see. enlarge Credit: Meet The Press Michelle Bachmann’s childish MTP sign She knew her talking points and kept repeating the number over and over again for almost two minutes until Gregory finally got annoyed with her. MR. GREGORY: Congresswoman, you’ve made, you’ve made your point. Crazytown Bachmann didn’t fall in line with her tea party comrades and didn’t bash Boehner as ineffectual as Speaker of the House, but finally addressed the question about the debt ceiling and said she was against raising it, which is the FOX News Judge Napolitano’s position. MR. GREGORY: The, the speaker has said that it would be irresponsible not to raise the debt limit, as will be called for soon. Will you agree with him on that and do that? REP. BACHMANN: I am not in favor of raising the debt ceiling. In the last 10 years we have raised the debt ceiling 10 times. We are just giving the Congress a license to keep on spending. C&Lers understand that the US would probably collapse if the debt ceiling is not raised. Gregory tried to get her to reply to the WSJ’s analysis of their own poll which said this about the Tea Party: “`It may be hard to understand why someone would try to jump off a cliff’ to solve the debt crisis, [pollster] Mr. [Bill] McInturff said of his fellow Republicans, `unless you understand that they are being chased by a tiger, and that tiger is the tea party.’” Is the tea party chasing the broader GOP off the cliff? Bachmann’s word salad response was that the tea party was made up of a broad-base coalition of people, not right and left and the Left is just afraid of it. No answer there. REP. BACHMANN: You know, I think that the political left has been very afraid of the tea party movement because it is not necessarily political. It’s not Democrats or Republicans. It’s made up of a very broad-based coalition…. Then Gregory switched to foreign policy questions and I was waiting for her to hold up her sign again so that she didn’t have to speak and make more of a fool of herself than she already had. Like Palin and Bush, when you don’t know what to say about war or worldly events, just mention the great Petraeus. MR. GREGORY: But, Congresswoman, my, my question, my question, is it in America’s vital interest to remove Moammar Gadhafi from power? REP. BACHMANN: Well, that, that question, I think, is one that, as, as Defense Secretary Gates has said, we need to be very careful about putting an army on the ground in the Middle East. We are extended now in Afghanistan and Iraq, and I think for us to consider further penetration at this time, we need to listen to General Petraeus and what he has to say. Do I need to say anything about her gasoline ignorance? Just consider, the day before the president took office gasoline was $1.83 a gallon. There are places today in the United States where it is over $4 a gallon. The instability in the Middle East never affects oil prices, it’s just Obamacare, people.
Continue reading …Sarah Palin famously announced her debate strategy when she told Gwen Ifill that she only going to answer questions she wanted to answer during the Vice Presidential Debate in 2008: And I may not answer the questions that either the moderator or you want to hear…. It appears Michele Bachmann has decided that whatever worked for Palin should work for her. She for the most part ignored or didn’t answer Gregory’s questions on MTP. She did come prepared with a visual aid however, a little hand held sign which had 105,464,000,000 written on it, signifying the $105 billion she claimed was “hidden” in the “Obamacare” legislation to fund the program. So she thinks that legislation shouldn’t include how it would be funded ? If not, what exactly were the Republicans threatening to defund ? Undeterred by details, she immediately and proudly held up her prop for Gregory and the viewers to see. enlarge Credit: Meet The Press Michelle Bachmann’s childish MTP sign She knew her talking points and kept repeating the number over and over again for almost two minutes until Gregory finally got annoyed with her. MR. GREGORY: Congresswoman, you’ve made, you’ve made your point. Crazytown Bachmann didn’t fall in line with her tea party comrades and didn’t bash Boehner as ineffectual as Speaker of the House, but finally addressed the question about the debt ceiling and said she was against raising it, which is the FOX News Judge Napolitano’s position. MR. GREGORY: The, the speaker has said that it would be irresponsible not to raise the debt limit, as will be called for soon. Will you agree with him on that and do that? REP. BACHMANN: I am not in favor of raising the debt ceiling. In the last 10 years we have raised the debt ceiling 10 times. We are just giving the Congress a license to keep on spending. C&Lers understand that the US would probably collapse if the debt ceiling is not raised. Gregory tried to get her to reply to the WSJ’s analysis of their own poll which said this about the Tea Party: “`It may be hard to understand why someone would try to jump off a cliff’ to solve the debt crisis, [pollster] Mr. [Bill] McInturff said of his fellow Republicans, `unless you understand that they are being chased by a tiger, and that tiger is the tea party.’” Is the tea party chasing the broader GOP off the cliff? Bachmann’s word salad response was that the tea party was made up of a broad-base coalition of people, not right and left and the Left is just afraid of it. No answer there. REP. BACHMANN: You know, I think that the political left has been very afraid of the tea party movement because it is not necessarily political. It’s not Democrats or Republicans. It’s made up of a very broad-based coalition…. Then Gregory switched to foreign policy questions and I was waiting for her to hold up her sign again so that she didn’t have to speak and make more of a fool of herself than she already had. Like Palin and Bush, when you don’t know what to say about war or worldly events, just mention the great Petraeus. MR. GREGORY: But, Congresswoman, my, my question, my question, is it in America’s vital interest to remove Moammar Gadhafi from power? REP. BACHMANN: Well, that, that question, I think, is one that, as, as Defense Secretary Gates has said, we need to be very careful about putting an army on the ground in the Middle East. We are extended now in Afghanistan and Iraq, and I think for us to consider further penetration at this time, we need to listen to General Petraeus and what he has to say. Do I need to say anything about her gasoline ignorance? Just consider, the day before the president took office gasoline was $1.83 a gallon. There are places today in the United States where it is over $4 a gallon. The instability in the Middle East never affects oil prices, it’s just Obamacare, people.
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) believes Americans should buy products made in the US, but he seems a bit confused about what those products might be. In an interview with ABC’s Christiane Amanpour Sunday, the senior senator from Arizona incorrectly declared that Apple’s iconic iPhone and iPad products were made in the US. ABC News dedicated several segments of their World News broadcast last week to furnishing a home only with products that were made in the US. In the end, the house was left without key electronic products like televisions and computers. McCain told Amanpour that the ABC News team should have simply purchased products from Apple. “I would also point out that if you emptied that house, if you had left a computer there or an iPad or an iPhone, those are built in the United States of America,” he said. In fact, both Apple products are designed in the US but manufactured in China. United Steelworkers President Leo Gerard corrected McCain in a later segment. “The iPad and iPhone are made in China,” he said. “They’re not made in America.”
Continue reading …Wow. I’m so used to the insane talk that passes for intelligent discourse on the Sunday bobblehead shows, it took a minute for it to sink in: I’m hearing an actual discussion on American industrial policy? But yes, indeed I was. It was a few years ago at a Campaign for America’s Future conference when I finally learned that every other industrialized nation had an industrial policy — that is, their governments made long-term plans that involved actual government supports and trade protections to support specific industries deemed important to their nation’s future. In case you haven’t noticed, we don’t do that. And our lack of leadership has led to profit-driven offshore manufacturing instead of good American jobs. So I was very excited to see Leo Gerard, president of the United Steel Workers union, invited onto the roundtable at This Week with Christiane Amanpour. Leo’s a little low-key, and he was too polite to interrupt the usual blowhard assertions of Mort Zuckerman, but he made some good points (he corrected crazy Grandpa McCain’s earlier statement that iPhones and iPads were made in America when they’re made in China) — including the idea that we’ve channeled our best and brightest into the financial services industry instead of mechanical engineering. (Zuckerman said no one makes students choose a career. Gerard said the chance of earning eight million a year does.) Anyway, I think that’s two weeks in a row that a voice from labor appeared on This Week. Thank you, Ms. Amanour.
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Chris Wallace sounds like he’s been going to the John Boehner school of compassionate conservatism. It wasn’t quite a “so be it” but “get used to it” isn’t too far off. That was his conclusion after showing how horribly damaging the decision to cut the RIF program is going to be for poor children. Wallace: For all the talk of waste, fraud and abuse, cutting the budget will mean ending real programs that serve real people. That doesn’t mean it’s wrong, but we’d better get used to it. Here’s the press release from RIF. Congress and President Obama Cut Reading Is Fundamental – America’s Largest Children’s Literacy Program serving over 4 Million children : March 3, 2011—Statement by Carol H. Rasco, president and CEO of Reading Is Fundamental On March 2, President Obama signed a bill that eliminated funding for Reading Is Fundamental (RIF) the nation’s largest organization providing free books and literacy resources to prepare and motivate children to read. RIF’s ability to provide 4.4 million children with free books and reading encouragement from RIF programs at nearly 17,000 locations throughout the United States is in jeopardy. RIF programs are in schools, community centers, hospitals, military bases, and other locations that serve children from low-income families, children with disabilities, homeless children, and children without adequate access to libraries. For 44 years, RIF has provided millions of children the opportunity to choose free and high-quality books to read and keep for themselves. The seeds of inspiration in these books have motivated children to follow their dreams and achieve their full potential. The facts are simple. Millions of children are living in the United States without access to books. Book distribution programs are a key factor in developing children to be readers at an early age and a gateway to greater student achievement. In 2010, RIF commissioned a comprehensive meta-analytic research synthesis by Learning Point Associates, an affiliate of the American Institutes for Research. The study found that providing children access to print through book lending and book distribution programs: improves their reading performance, is instrumental in helping them learn the basics of reading, causes them to read more and for longer lengths of time, and improves their attitude toward reading and learning. RIF has been an authorized, national program by the Department of Education through the Elementary and Secondary Education Act for over thirty years. RIF has received bi-partisan support and has been funded by six administrations without interruption until now. Our educational programs are under attack and it’s time to fight back. Investments in education are investments in our country’s future—our children. When I visit RIF programs across this country, I see firsthand the joy children feel when empowered to choose their very own book to own. All children deserve the American Dream, and we owe it to our nation’s children to provide the resources they need to turn the dream into reality. Even such small opportunities and encouragements to choose can inspire children to make greater choices: to choose learning, to choose success in school and life, to choose a brighter future. RIF is committed to ensuring that despite the odds, all children have the chance to experience the joy of reading and have books to call their own. By providing children this opportunity, we are preparing them for a better life. Reading is indeed fundamental.
Continue reading …I love Michael Moore, because the man is a real American. There was a time in the early days of the blogosphere when most liberal bloggers ignored him – he made liberals “look bad,” he “isn’t our kind.” I wasn’t one of those bloggers, maybe because he is my kind — a fighting liberal from a blue-collar family. (It’s just hysterical when Sarah Palin calls this dyed-in-the-wool Michigander a “Hollywood” liberal.) He marched with the Wisconsin protesters yesterday and spoke at their rally. He gave a wonderful speech called “America Is Not Broke”, and we all should memorize it so that the next time a Fox News-loving person starts spouting the party line, you can set him or her straight. From PoliticusUSA : “America is not broke. Contrary to what those in power would like you to believe so that you’ll give up your pension, cut your wages and settle for the life your great grandparents had. America is not broke. Not by a long shot. The country is awash in wealth and cash. It’s just that it is not in your hands.” He then called the great conservative redistribution of America’s wealth a heist: “It has been transferred in the greatest heist in American history from the workers and consumers to the banks and portfolios of the uber-rich . Right now, this afternoon, just 400 Americans have more wealth than half of all Americans combined. Let me say that again, and please, someone in the mainstream media, just repeat this fact once. We’re not greedy. We’ll be happy to hear it just once. 400 obscenely wealthy individuals, 400 little Mubaraks, most of whom benefited in some way from the multi-trillion dollar taxpayer bailout of 2008 now have more cash, stock, and property than the assets of 155 million Americans combined.” “I have nothing more than a high school education, but Gov. Walker, back when I was in school, every student had to take one semester of economics in order to graduate, and here is what I learned. Money doesn’t grow on trees, unless it’s a palm tree. It grows when we make things. It grows when we have good jobs with good wages that we use to buy the things that we need, and guess what? That creates more jobs. “It grows when we provide an outstanding education system. An educational system that then grows a new generation of entrepreneur, inventors, scientists, thinkers. The people who will come up with the next great idea for this planet, and those ideas create jobs, and the jobs produce tax revenue, but the few who have the most money don‘t want to pay their fair share of the taxes.” Moore spoke about how the rich tax dodgers crashed our economic system. “They’d rather invest it in a gambling casino known as Wall St. betting for or against the stock market or against your home mortgage, and the entire population suffers because that wealth has been removed from circulation. What’s so cynical about this is that the very people who don’t pay their taxes crashed our economic system. They created the unemployment which has cost us tax revenue and states like Wisconsin have ended up with a so-called budget crisis, but Wisconsin is not broke.” “What are three biggest lies of the last decade? Let’s repeat them. Number one, Wisconsin is broke. Number two, there’s weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, and number three, the Packers needs Farve to win the Super Bowl. The nation is not broke, my friends. There’s lots of money to go around, lots, lots. It’s just that those in charge have diverted that wealth into a deep well that sits in their well-guarded estates. They know. They know. They have committed crimes to make this happen.” Jason Easley and Sarah Jones wrote: Moore did something brilliant. He shifted the narrative. Republicans want the Wisconsin story to be about the budget. Early on, Democrats were focused on the issues of liberty and collective bargaining. Moore broadened the message and created a third narrative about how decades of pro-corporate and pro-wealthy economic policies have redistributed the nation’s wealth from the people to a small group of super-rich haves. This is the story that terrifies both conservative politicians and the network of billionaire wealth that owns them. Wisconsin isn’t only about freedom, unions and collective bargaining. At a deeper level, Wisconsin is about the systemic redistribution of wealth that the Republican Party has overseen since 1980. It is about creating an economic caste system where the rich always stay rich and rest of us are destined to serve them. Conservatives have expertly hid their true motives for years with distractions like the culture wars, and sometimes shooting wars like in Iraq. While America was focusing on the terror alert level, George W. Bush was picking up the mantle of Ronald Reagan and redistributing wealth. If Republicans and their puppet masters are successful in breaking the back of organized labor, then millions of Americans will be returned to a form of economic serfdom that was once thought to have been banished decades ago. Wisconsin is the battle field and unions are our last line of defense, and nothing less than economic liberty, and the American Dream hinge on the outcome. Watch live streaming video from theuptake at livestream.com
Continue reading …