Home » Posts tagged with » america (Page 185)

Two years ago, George Soros said he wanted to reorganize the entire global economic system. In two short weeks, he is going to start – and no one seems to have noticed. On April 8, a group he’s funded with $50 million is holding a major economic conference and Soros’s goal for such an event is to “establish new international rules” and “reform the currency system.” It’s all according to a plan laid out in a Nov. 4, 2009, Soros op-ed calling for “ a grand bargain that rearranges the entire financial order .” The event is bringing together “more than 200 academic, business and government policy thought leaders” to repeat the famed 1944 Bretton Woods gathering that helped create the World Bank and International Monetary Fund . Soros wants a new “multilateral system,” or an economic system where America isn’t so dominant. More than two-thirds of the slated speakers have direct ties to Soros. The billionaire who thinks “the main enemy of the open society, I believe, is no longer the communist but the capitalist threat” is taking no chances. Thus far, this global gathering has generated less publicity than a spelling bee. And that’s with at least four journalists on the speakers list, including a managing editor for the Financial Times and editors for both Reuters and The Times. Given Soros’s warnings of what might happen without an agreement, this should be a big deal. But it’s not. What is a big deal is that Soros is doing exactly what he wanted to do. His 2009 commentary pushed for “a new Bretton Woods conference, like the one that established the post-WWII international financial architecture.” And he had already set the wheels in motion. Just a week before that op-ed was published, Soros had founded the New York City-based Institute for New Economic Thinking (INET) , the group hosting the conference set at the Mount Washington Resort , the very same hotel that hosted the first gathering. The most recent INET conference was held at Central European University, in Budapest. CEU received $206 million from Soros in 2005 and has $880 million in its endowment now, according to The Chronicle of Higher Education . This, too, is a gathering of Soros supporters. INET is bringing together prominent people like former U.K. Prime Minister Gordon Brown , former Fed Chairman Paul Volcker and Soros, to produce “a lot of high-quality, breakthrough thinking.” While INET claims more than 200 will attend, only 79 speakers are listed on its site – and it already looks like a Soros convention. Twenty-two are on Soros-funded INET’s board and three more are INET grantees. Nineteen are listed as contributors for another Soros operation – Project Syndicate , which calls itself “the world's pre-eminent source of original op-ed commentaries” reaching “456 leading newspapers in 150 countries.” It’s financed by Soros’s Open Society Institute. That’s just the beginning. The speakers include: • Volcker who is chairman of President Obama ’s Economic Advisory Board. He wrote the forward for Soros’s best-known book, “The Alchemy of Finance” and praised Soros as “an enormously successful speculator” who wrote “with insight and passion” about the problems of globalization. • Economist Jeffrey Sachs, director of The Earth Institute and longtime recipient of Soros charity cash. Sachs received $50 million from Soros for the U.N. Millennium Project , which he also directs. Sachs is world-renown for his liberal economics. In 2009, for example, he complained about low U.S. taxes , saying the “U.S. will have to raise taxes in order to pay for new spending initiatives, especially in the areas of sustainable energy, climate change, education, and relief for the poor.” • Soros friend Joseph E. Stiglitz, a former senior vice president and chief economist for the World Bank and Nobel Prize winner in Economics. Stiglitz shares similar views to Soros and has criticized free-market economists whom he calls “ free market fundamentalists. ” Naturally, he’s on the INET board and is a contributor to Project Syndicate. • INET Executive Director Rob Johnson , a former managing director at Soros Fund Management, who is on the Board of Directors for the Soros-funded Economic Policy Institute. Johnson has complained that government intervention in the fiscal crisis hasn’t been enough and wanted “ restructuring ,” including asking “for letters of resignation from the top executives of all the major banks.” Have no doubt about it: This is a Soros event from top to bottom. Even Soros admits his ties to INET are a problem, saying , “there is a conflict there which I fully recognize.” He claims he stays out of operations. That’s impossible. The whole event is his operation. INET isn’t subtle about its aims for the conference. Johnson interviewed fellow INET board member Robert Skidelsky about “The Need for a New Bretton Woods” in a recent video. The introductory slide to the video is subtitled: “How currency issues and tension between the US and China are renewing calls for a global financial overhaul.” Skidelsky called for a new agreement and said in the video that the conflict between the United States and China was “at the center of any monetary deal that may be struck, that needs to be struck.” Soros described in the 2009 op-ed that U.S.-China conflict as “another stark choice between two fundamentally different forms of organization: international capitalism and state capitalism.” He concluded that “a new multilateral system based on sounder principles must be invented.” As he explained it in 2010, “ we need a global sheriff .” In the 2000 version of his book “Open Society: Reforming Global Capitalism,” Soros wrote how the Bretton Woods institutions “failed spectacularly” during the economic crisis of the late 1990s. When he called for a new Bretton Woods in 2009, he wanted it to “reconstitute the International Monetary Fund,” and while he’s at it, restructure the United Nations , too, boosting China and other countries at our expense. “Reorganizing the world order will need to extend beyond the financial system and involve the United Nations, especially membership of the Security Council ,” he wrote. “That process needs to be initiated by the U.S., but China and other developing countries ought to participate as equals.” Soros emphasized that point, that this needs to be a global solution, making America one among many. “The rising powers must be present at the creation of this new system in order to ensure that they will be active supporters.” And that’s exactly the kind of event INET is delivering, with the event website emphasizing “today's reconstruction must engage the larger European Union, as well as the emerging economies of Eastern Europe, Latin America , and Asia.” China figures prominently, including a senior economist for the World Bank in Beijing, the director of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, the chief adviser for the China Banking Regulatory Commission and the Director of the Center on U.S.-China Relations. This is all easy to do when you have the reach of George Soros who funds more than 1,200 organizations. Except, any one of those 1,200 would shout such an event from the highest mountain. Groups like MoveOn.org or the Center for American Progress didn’t make their names being quiet. The same holds true globally, where Soros has given more than $7 billion to Open Society Foundations – including many media-savvy organizations just a phone call away. Why hasn’t the Soros network spread the word? Especially since Soros warns, all this needs to happen because “the alternative is frightening.” The Bush-hating billionaire says America is scary “because a declining superpower losing both political and economic dominance but still preserving military supremacy is a dangerous mix.” He wrote that the U.S. “could lead a cooperative effort to involve both the developed and the developing world, thereby reestablishing American leadership in an acceptable form.” That’s what this conference is all about – changing the global economy and the United States to make them “acceptable” to George Soros. — Iris Somberg contributed to this commentary. Dan Gainor is the Boone Pickens Fellow and the Media Research Center’s Vice President for Business and Culture. His column appears each week on The Fox Forum. He can also be contacted on FaceBook and Twitter as dangainor.

Continue reading …
Ask Leo: hydrogen cars

The much-heralded ‘hydrogen economy’ never appears to get out of first gear. Are our politicians failing us by not pushing harder for hydrogen-powered cars? Why don’t governments push for more use of hydrogen-powered vehicles? Ashraf Abdo, via Facebook We seem to have been talking about the “hydrogen economy” for well over a decade now, but, like so many other saviour technologies, its arrival never seems to get any closer. Yes, there have been the showcasing examples of the Honda FCX Clarity and the CUTE (Clean Urban Transport for Europe) bus trials in London. But without the infrastructure to produce and distribute hydrogen as a fuel, these vehicles are little more than curios. It is significant, too, that talk of hydrogen seems to have dampened down in the US. After President Bush announced in 2003 that hydrogen-powered cars would be at heart of how America weaned itself off oil, the Obama administration has pulled back from promoting the technology with energy secretary Steven Chu stating in 2009 that support for research programmes would be curtailed because the government was “moving away from funding vehicular hydrogen fuel cells to technologies with more immediate promise”. Are our governments making a mistake by not investing much further in hydrogen? Or are there too many problems with the technology to see it becoming a genuine rival to oil as a transportation fuel? This column is an experiment in crowd-sourcing a reader’s question, so please let us know your views and experiences below (as opposed to emailing them) and I will join in with some of my own thoughts and reactions as the debate progresses. I will also be inviting various interested parties to join the debate too. • Please send your own environment question to ask.leo.and.lucy@guardian.co.uk . Or, alternatively, message me on Twitter @LeoHickman Hydrogen power Energy Renewable energy Ethical and green living Motoring Leo Hickman guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

Captain America

No Comment
Captain America

How to make Captain America’s shield Captain America – Trailer 1 HD Captain America: The First Avenger – Full Trailer Captain America Trailer On Thursday, Watch 3 Snippets Now … Word from Marvel is that the first real trailer for Captain America : The First Avenger will finally arrive tomorrow. That other trailer you’re probably thinking of, wasn’t so much a trailer as a Super Bowl spot. … Captain America Movie Trailer : Teaser Trailer Captain America Movie Trailer Let’s watch the first full-length movie trailer of Captain America , the upcoming live action movie adaptation directed by Joe Johnston and starring Chris Evans in the title role: Captain America Trailer … Captain America Trailer Debuts « Spinoff Online – Covering TV … Directed by Joe Johnston, Captain America : The First Avenger stars Chris Evans, Sebastian Stan, Hugo Weaving, Hayley Atwell, Toby Jones, Stanley Tucci, Richard Armitage, Natalie Dormer, Dominic Cooper, Neal McDonough, Tommy Lee Jones … New ' Captain America ' trailer: Watch here | Inside Movies | EW.com Entertainment Tonight just debuted an exclusive trailer of the upcoming Captain America film, which focuses in on the transformation of Steve Rogers from a skinny 4-F loser into a ridiculously muscular superdude. The Complete New Captain America Trailer Is Here Bleeding Cool … First Image Of Chris Evans In His Captain America Duds – UPDATED With Super Hi-Res UPDATE: Click through on the image to get to super hi-res. You’ll be able to make out individual hairs. We’ve seen Chris Evans as Steve. … atsbomb says: New Captain America trailer is looking guud. Slowly but steadily Avengers are forming! http://t.co/BWhrsyG

Continue reading …
US soldier admits killing for sport

Jeremy Morlock, 23, tells US military court he was part of a ‘kill team’ that faked combat situations to murder Afghan civilians An American soldier has pleaded guilty to being part of a “kill team” who deliberately murdered Afghan civilians for sport last year. Army Specialist Jeremy Morlock, 23, told a military court he had helped to kill three unarmed Afghans. “The plan was to kill people, sir,” he told an army judge in Fort Lea, near Seattle, after his plea. The case has caused outraged headlines around the world. In a series of videotaped confessions to investigators, some of which have been broadcast on American television, Morlock detailed how he and other members of his Stryker brigade set up and faked combat situations so that they could kill civilians who posed no threat to them. Four other soldiers are still to come to trial over the incidents. The case is a PR disaster for America’s military and has been compared to the notorious incidents of torture that emerged from the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq. This week the German magazine Der Spiegel published three pictures that showed American soldiers, including Morlock, posing with the corpse of a young Afghan boy as if it were a hunting trophy. Some soldiers apparently kept body parts of their victims, including a skull, as souvenirs. In a statement issued in response to the publication of the photos the US army apologised to the families of the dead. “[The photos are] repugnant to us as human beings and contrary to the standards and values of the United States army,” the statement said. Morlock has told investigators that the murders took place between January and May last year and were instigated by an officer in his unit, Staff Sergeant Calvin Gibbs. He described how elaborate plans were made to pick out civilian targets, kill them and then make their deaths look like they were insurgents. In his confession Morlock described shooting a victim as Gibbs tossed a grenade at him. “We identify a guy. Gibbs makes a comment, like, you know, you guys wanna wax this guy or not,” Morlock said in the confession. Morlock now stands to be sentenced to at least 24 years in jail but with eligibility for parole after seven years. That has come about because Morlock struck a plea bargain that will see a lighter sentence in return for testifying against his fellow soldiers. US military United States Afghanistan Paul Harris guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

Paul Harris

No Comment
Paul Harris

A reality TV collaboration between the action star and Arizona sheriff would be hilarious – if real law and order was not involved There are some news events that are simply beyond parody – when a current trend loses the plot so badly that you can do nothing but gasp in stunned amazement. But the invasion of ever more extreme reality television shows into modern American culture should be immune to this phenomenon. After all, this is a medium defined by demented Z-list wannabes trapped in an arms race of outrageousness designed to grab their 15 minutes of fame. In a post-Jersey Shore world surely nothing could emerge from reality TV that could actually shock? Well, not until now. This week, a bizarre incident unfolded in Phoenix , Arizona, involving 115 roosters, an out-of-control sheriff, several tanks, a Swat team, a suspected cockfighter, a bomb robot and – like a muscular, suntanned cherry on top of the whole pile – faded action star Steven Seagal. The setup was simple enough. Police suspected local man Jesus Sanchez Llovera, 43, of running an illegal cockfighting ring (the huge flock of roosters on his property no doubt being the clinching clue). So they decided to arrest him. While he was at home. Alone. Unarmed. With no police record of owning any weapons. Still, that should have been simple enough. A lone squad car, maybe two, could have done it. But things are rarely that simple with the sheriff of Maricopa County: the notoriously headline hungry figure of Joe Arpaio . For Arpaio’s department is working with Seagal, who is shooting a reality TV show and has signed up as a police volunteer. The show is called Lawman . So, instead of pulling up outside Llovera’s house and knocking on his door, Arpaio assembled a mini-army of police deputies, two armoured vehicles, a fully-armed Swat team and the bomb robot. They descended on Llovera’s house and smashed his windows, knocked down his gate with one of the tanks and arrested him. Seagal, dressed in combat fatigues and sunglasses and sporting a gun on his hip, was riding in one of the police tanks. Seagal’s film crew taped the whole thing. No doubt, after heavy editing, it will make for a few dramatic moments of television. The reasons to be stunned and shocked at this barely need describing and should appall anyone of any political background (which would be a rare thing in as polarised a state as Arizona). First off is the cost: across America, cities are slashing policing to the bone to cope with severe budget cuts. Yet, in Arizona, the needs of an ageing action star’s reality show resulted in a raid that some lawyers estimate would have cost thousands of dollars. Second, it has emerged that Seagal has a contract with the sheriff’s department that allows him free reign to go along on any arrests the sheriff makes. In a country notoriously – and often admirably – obsessed with individual freedoms and constitutional rights, why has so much privilege in the realm of law and order been granted to a reality TV star? Finally, there is the horrific blending of policing and entertainment that this incident represents. The two should be kept utterly apart. Here, they are not only mixed, but it appears that reality TV has the upper hand, calling the shots. Arpaio, for his part, denies staging the whole thing for Seagal and his show. What about Seagal’s thoughts? In his low, grumbling monotone, he explained to one local TV reporter the reasoning for his presence on the raid. “Animal cruelty is one of my pet peeves,” he said. That’s nice. But keeping idiotic reality TV shows away from the operation of a police force and the administration of justice is one of mine. Reality TV Arizona Animal welfare United States US television Paul Harris guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Racist letter read by Arizona lawmaker to state Senate may have been a hoax

Click here to view this media Two Arizona lawmakers set off charges of racism after one instructed the other to read a controversial letter on the state Senate floor last week during a debate over five immigration bills. The letter, allegedly from a man who works as a substitute teacher in Glendale, said that Hispanic students “hate America” and only want to become “gang members and gangsters,” according to ABC News . Problem is, local reporters could not find anyone under the man’s name who had worked for any of the area school districts, and key details in the letter were contradicted by school officials. That left some groups suggesting the letter was an outright hoax. “Most of the Hispanic students do not want to be educated but rather be gang members and gangsters,” State Sen. Lori Klein said, reading from the letter at the prompting of Senate President Russell Pearce. “They hate America and are determined to reclaim this area for Mexico.” “If we are able to remove the illegals out of our schools, the class sizes would be reduced and the students who wanted to learn would have a better chance to do so and become productive citizens,” the letter continued. “Thank you for standing up to this invasion.” Tony Hill, the author of the letter, also claimed that Hispanic students refused to participate in a Mark Twain assignment and instead “threw the textbooks at each other.” “I don’t think I’ve ever heard any floor speech similar to the one that was given out right now,” Democratic State Sen. Steve Gallardo told the Senate. Hispanic students “do not have dreams to be gang members, they do not want to be thugs or whatever we want to phrase it as. These are good kids.” Members of the Hispanic caucus in the state have questioned the authenticity of the author. KGUN 9 contacted all five school districts in Glendale and all said that Anthony or Tony Hill had never worked for them as a teacher or substitute teacher. “The Glendale School District also stated it does not teach its 8th grade students about Mark Twain as Hill alluded to in his letter,” KGUN 9′s Steve Nuñez wrote. “Not only does Senator Klein owe us all an apology and every student in the state of Arizona an apology, I think Russell Pearce has some questions to answer,” Gallardo said. Pearce released a statement Tuesday, refusing to apologize or say if he agreed with the letter. “On March 17, Sen. Lori Klein read on the Senate floor a letter written to me by a teacher in the West Valley,” Pearce’s statement began. “I am shocked that Members of the Minority are so quick to defend the actions of these troublemakers, and mock the frustration many teachers feel in bringing order to the classroom.” “I’ve spoken with the teacher who wrote this letter. He stands by all he wrote. This is happening in our classrooms. The behavior by these students cannot and will not be condoned.” “Some Members of the Minority are now calling for me to apologize, and calling for Sen. Klein to apologize for reading it. We will not apologize,” he added. Pearce drew attention to himself last week when he told tea party members that they were not citizens of the United States. Hill’s letter to Pearce follows: Dear Senator Russell Pearce, I am compelled to write to you about a recent event that occurred to me. I currently work as a substitute teacher in the west valley areas of Phoenix, Glendale, and Peoria. I was called upon to teach history and language arts for 8th grade at a Glendale public school. The number of students I had in each class ranged from 28 to 38 children, which were almost all Hispanic and a couple of Black children. The day started out as usual turning on the television listening and watching the announcements and saying the Pledge of Allegiance. During the Pledge of Allegiance I notice the vast majority of students refusing to stand and say the pledge. I asked the students why they refused to say the Pledge of Allegiance and they responded by saying, ‘we are Mexicans and Americans stole our land’. The teacher’s instructions were for the students to read a few pages and answer the questions regarding Mark Twain in their history textbook and to finish their final drafts to Senator Steve Gallardo thanking him for his position on Illegal Immigration rights. Their teacher apparently had showed them a video with Senator Steve Gallardo and Lou Dobbs. Most of the students came unprepared for class not possessing paper and pencil. I provided the students with paper and pencils only to have them wade-up the paper and throw it at each other along with their pencils. The students’ final drafts that I read were basically the same. Most of them stated they were in the country illegally, White Americans are racist, and that they came here for a better life. I asked the class if America adopted Mexico immigration laws would Americans still be consider racist? That question they could not answer and called me a racist for asking it. I mentioned that my wife and children are Hispanic so how could I be racist? I asked the students to stop speaking Spanish in class because it was impolite to speak a language in front of people who may not speak that language. Their response was that Americans better learn Spanish and their customs because they are taking their land back from us. When it came to completing the Mark Twain assignment only ten students completed it out of all my classes. Most of the students refused to open the book, tore the pages out of the book, or threw the textbooks at each other. I thought are these the students we are trying to educate with taxpayers money. I have found that substitute teaching in these areas most of the Hispanic students do not want to be educated but rather be gang members and gangsters. They hate America and are determined to reclaim this area for Mexico. If we are able to remove the illegals out of our schools, the class sizes would be reduced and the students who wanted to learn would have a better chance to do so and become productive citizens. I applaud and support your efforts to stop this invasion into our state and country. When the citizens of a country are forced to speak the invaders language, adopt their customs, and forced to support them, are we not a conquer nation? I do not want to see our state and nation turned into a third world country. Thank you for standing up to this invasion. You may contact me by phone, e-mail, or mail. Thank you, again. Sincerely, Tony Hill

Continue reading …
Conservative WI Justice Prosser attacks Chief Justice as a ‘bitch,’ threatens to ‘destroy’ her

enlarge Credit: Prosser Website Megyn Kelly and FOX News have been trying to paint WI protesters as being violent thugs and Tea Party-like (my analogy) ever since the grassroots resistance to Gov. Scott Walker’s punitive measures began. Maybe Megyn can take a look at how Conservative Judge Prosser has been behaving: As the deeply divided state Supreme Court wrestled over whether to force one member off criminal cases last year, Justice David Prosser exploded at Chief Justice Shirley Abrahamson behind closed doors, calling her a “bitch” and threatening to “destroy” her. The incident, revealed in interviews as well as e-mails between justices, shows fractures on the court run even deeper than what has been revealed in public sniping in recent years. Problems got so bad that justices on both sides described the court as dysfunctional, and Prosser and others suggested bringing in a third party for help, e-mails show. Prosser acknowledged the incident recently and said he thought it was becoming public now in an attempt to hurt him politically. Prosser faces Assistant Attorney General JoAnne Kloppenburg in the April 5 election. He said the outburst came after Abrahamson took steps to undermine him politically and to embarrass him and other court conservatives. “In the context of this, I said, ‘You are a total bitch,’ ” Prosser said. “I probably overreacted, but I think it was entirely warranted. . . . They (Abrahamson and Justice Ann Walsh Bradley) are masters at deliberately goading people into perhaps incautious statements. This is bullying and abuse of very, very long standing.” The Feb. 10, 2010, incident occurred as the court privately discussed a request to remove Justice Michael Gableman from a criminal case. “In a fit of temper, you were screaming at the chief; calling her a ‘bitch,’ threatening her with ‘. . . I will destroy you’; and describing the means of destruction as a war against her ‘and it won’t be a ground war,’ ” Bradley wrote in a Feb. 18, 2010, e-mail to Prosser and others. “In my view, a necessary step to address the dysfunction is to end these abusive temper tantrums. No one brought in from the outside is going to cure this aspect of the dysfunction.” Three days later, Justice Patience Roggensack wrote to Bradley, criticizing her for copying judicial assistants on her e-mail. Don’t you just love how the victims of his foulmouthed bullying are themselves painted as “bullies”? It’s the ‘Bloody Shirt’ principle in action, converting perpetrators into victims and vice versa. On FOX’ America’s Election HQ website, an article appears about Judge Prosser from 03/22 called : Collective Bargaining Appeal Takes Center Stage in Wisconsin Supreme Court Election which omits Prosser’s abusive actions altogether. What a shock. Our pal David Edwards adds some context to Prosser’s resume at Raw Story: The admission that he one called the chief justice a “bitch” follows a spotted history on women’s isssues. In 1990, while serving as a Wisconsin state Representative, Prosser argued that teen women would lie about being raped to get an abortion. As a Supreme Court justice in 2010, he voted to uphold a circuit court decision that said the City of Milwaukee’s Paid Sick Leave Ordinance did not adequately disclose that leave could be used related to domestic and sexual violence. While District Attorney of Outagamie County in 1979, Prosser had also refused to prosecute a priest that had allegedly sexually abused two children. “I was ready to take the stand,” Troy Merryfield, one of the abused children, told the Journal Sentinel years later . “He (Prosser) said it would be too embarrassing for a kid my age and said what jury would believe a kid testifying against a priest?” The conservative Prosser is facing Assistant Attorney General JoAnne Kloppenburg in a re-election battle which could change the makeup of the Wisconsin Supreme Court. The Kloppenburg campaign attacked Prosser after his spokesman admitted the justice would serve as a “complement” to Republican Gov. Scott Walker if re-elected. “This race is about returning independence and impartiality to the court,” Kloppenburg wrote in an op-ed for Madison.com. “It’s about electing justices who haven’t prejudged cases and who see the judiciary as a co-equal branch of government and a check and balance against overreaching by the executive and legislative branches, not as a ‘complement’ to their political agenda.” This Justice is up for reelection on April 5th, so let’s hope he goes down.

Continue reading …
Conservative WI Justice Prosser attacks Chief Justice as a ‘bitch,’ threatens to ‘destroy’ her

enlarge Credit: Prosser Website Megyn Kelly and FOX News have been trying to paint WI protesters as being violent thugs and Tea Party-like (my analogy) ever since the grassroots resistance to Gov. Scott Walker’s punitive measures began. Maybe Megyn can take a look at how Conservative Judge Prosser has been behaving: As the deeply divided state Supreme Court wrestled over whether to force one member off criminal cases last year, Justice David Prosser exploded at Chief Justice Shirley Abrahamson behind closed doors, calling her a “bitch” and threatening to “destroy” her. The incident, revealed in interviews as well as e-mails between justices, shows fractures on the court run even deeper than what has been revealed in public sniping in recent years. Problems got so bad that justices on both sides described the court as dysfunctional, and Prosser and others suggested bringing in a third party for help, e-mails show. Prosser acknowledged the incident recently and said he thought it was becoming public now in an attempt to hurt him politically. Prosser faces Assistant Attorney General JoAnne Kloppenburg in the April 5 election. He said the outburst came after Abrahamson took steps to undermine him politically and to embarrass him and other court conservatives. “In the context of this, I said, ‘You are a total bitch,’ ” Prosser said. “I probably overreacted, but I think it was entirely warranted. . . . They (Abrahamson and Justice Ann Walsh Bradley) are masters at deliberately goading people into perhaps incautious statements. This is bullying and abuse of very, very long standing.” The Feb. 10, 2010, incident occurred as the court privately discussed a request to remove Justice Michael Gableman from a criminal case. “In a fit of temper, you were screaming at the chief; calling her a ‘bitch,’ threatening her with ‘. . . I will destroy you’; and describing the means of destruction as a war against her ‘and it won’t be a ground war,’ ” Bradley wrote in a Feb. 18, 2010, e-mail to Prosser and others. “In my view, a necessary step to address the dysfunction is to end these abusive temper tantrums. No one brought in from the outside is going to cure this aspect of the dysfunction.” Three days later, Justice Patience Roggensack wrote to Bradley, criticizing her for copying judicial assistants on her e-mail. Don’t you just love how the victims of his foulmouthed bullying are themselves painted as “bullies”? It’s the ‘Bloody Shirt’ principle in action, converting perpetrators into victims and vice versa. On FOX’ America’s Election HQ website, an article appears about Judge Prosser from 03/22 called : Collective Bargaining Appeal Takes Center Stage in Wisconsin Supreme Court Election which omits Prosser’s abusive actions altogether. What a shock. Our pal David Edwards adds some context to Prosser’s resume at Raw Story: The admission that he one called the chief justice a “bitch” follows a spotted history on women’s isssues. In 1990, while serving as a Wisconsin state Representative, Prosser argued that teen women would lie about being raped to get an abortion. As a Supreme Court justice in 2010, he voted to uphold a circuit court decision that said the City of Milwaukee’s Paid Sick Leave Ordinance did not adequately disclose that leave could be used related to domestic and sexual violence. While District Attorney of Outagamie County in 1979, Prosser had also refused to prosecute a priest that had allegedly sexually abused two children. “I was ready to take the stand,” Troy Merryfield, one of the abused children, told the Journal Sentinel years later . “He (Prosser) said it would be too embarrassing for a kid my age and said what jury would believe a kid testifying against a priest?” The conservative Prosser is facing Assistant Attorney General JoAnne Kloppenburg in a re-election battle which could change the makeup of the Wisconsin Supreme Court. The Kloppenburg campaign attacked Prosser after his spokesman admitted the justice would serve as a “complement” to Republican Gov. Scott Walker if re-elected. “This race is about returning independence and impartiality to the court,” Kloppenburg wrote in an op-ed for Madison.com. “It’s about electing justices who haven’t prejudged cases and who see the judiciary as a co-equal branch of government and a check and balance against overreaching by the executive and legislative branches, not as a ‘complement’ to their political agenda.” This Justice is up for reelection on April 5th, so let’s hope he goes down.

Continue reading …
Conservative WI Justice Prosser attacks Chief Justice as a ‘bitch,’ threatens to ‘destroy’ her

enlarge Credit: Prosser Website Megyn Kelly and FOX News have been trying to paint WI protesters as being violent thugs and Tea Party-like (my analogy) ever since the grassroots resistance to Gov. Scott Walker’s punitive measures began. Maybe Megyn can take a look at how Conservative Judge Prosser has been behaving: As the deeply divided state Supreme Court wrestled over whether to force one member off criminal cases last year, Justice David Prosser exploded at Chief Justice Shirley Abrahamson behind closed doors, calling her a “bitch” and threatening to “destroy” her. The incident, revealed in interviews as well as e-mails between justices, shows fractures on the court run even deeper than what has been revealed in public sniping in recent years. Problems got so bad that justices on both sides described the court as dysfunctional, and Prosser and others suggested bringing in a third party for help, e-mails show. Prosser acknowledged the incident recently and said he thought it was becoming public now in an attempt to hurt him politically. Prosser faces Assistant Attorney General JoAnne Kloppenburg in the April 5 election. He said the outburst came after Abrahamson took steps to undermine him politically and to embarrass him and other court conservatives. “In the context of this, I said, ‘You are a total bitch,’ ” Prosser said. “I probably overreacted, but I think it was entirely warranted. . . . They (Abrahamson and Justice Ann Walsh Bradley) are masters at deliberately goading people into perhaps incautious statements. This is bullying and abuse of very, very long standing.” The Feb. 10, 2010, incident occurred as the court privately discussed a request to remove Justice Michael Gableman from a criminal case. “In a fit of temper, you were screaming at the chief; calling her a ‘bitch,’ threatening her with ‘. . . I will destroy you’; and describing the means of destruction as a war against her ‘and it won’t be a ground war,’ ” Bradley wrote in a Feb. 18, 2010, e-mail to Prosser and others. “In my view, a necessary step to address the dysfunction is to end these abusive temper tantrums. No one brought in from the outside is going to cure this aspect of the dysfunction.” Three days later, Justice Patience Roggensack wrote to Bradley, criticizing her for copying judicial assistants on her e-mail. Don’t you just love how the victims of his foulmouthed bullying are themselves painted as “bullies”? It’s the ‘Bloody Shirt’ principle in action, converting perpetrators into victims and vice versa. On FOX’ America’s Election HQ website, an article appears about Judge Prosser from 03/22 called : Collective Bargaining Appeal Takes Center Stage in Wisconsin Supreme Court Election which omits Prosser’s abusive actions altogether. What a shock. Our pal David Edwards adds some context to Prosser’s resume at Raw Story: The admission that he one called the chief justice a “bitch” follows a spotted history on women’s isssues. In 1990, while serving as a Wisconsin state Representative, Prosser argued that teen women would lie about being raped to get an abortion. As a Supreme Court justice in 2010, he voted to uphold a circuit court decision that said the City of Milwaukee’s Paid Sick Leave Ordinance did not adequately disclose that leave could be used related to domestic and sexual violence. While District Attorney of Outagamie County in 1979, Prosser had also refused to prosecute a priest that had allegedly sexually abused two children. “I was ready to take the stand,” Troy Merryfield, one of the abused children, told the Journal Sentinel years later . “He (Prosser) said it would be too embarrassing for a kid my age and said what jury would believe a kid testifying against a priest?” The conservative Prosser is facing Assistant Attorney General JoAnne Kloppenburg in a re-election battle which could change the makeup of the Wisconsin Supreme Court. The Kloppenburg campaign attacked Prosser after his spokesman admitted the justice would serve as a “complement” to Republican Gov. Scott Walker if re-elected. “This race is about returning independence and impartiality to the court,” Kloppenburg wrote in an op-ed for Madison.com. “It’s about electing justices who haven’t prejudged cases and who see the judiciary as a co-equal branch of government and a check and balance against overreaching by the executive and legislative branches, not as a ‘complement’ to their political agenda.” This Justice is up for reelection on April 5th, so let’s hope he goes down.

Continue reading …
Conservative WI Justice Prosser attacks Chief Justice as a ‘bitch,’ threatens to ‘destroy’ her

enlarge Credit: Prosser Website Megyn Kelly and FOX News have been trying to paint WI protesters as being violent thugs and Tea Party-like (my analogy) ever since the grassroots resistance to Gov. Scott Walker’s punitive measures began. Maybe Megyn can take a look at how Conservative Judge Prosser has been behaving: As the deeply divided state Supreme Court wrestled over whether to force one member off criminal cases last year, Justice David Prosser exploded at Chief Justice Shirley Abrahamson behind closed doors, calling her a “bitch” and threatening to “destroy” her. The incident, revealed in interviews as well as e-mails between justices, shows fractures on the court run even deeper than what has been revealed in public sniping in recent years. Problems got so bad that justices on both sides described the court as dysfunctional, and Prosser and others suggested bringing in a third party for help, e-mails show. Prosser acknowledged the incident recently and said he thought it was becoming public now in an attempt to hurt him politically. Prosser faces Assistant Attorney General JoAnne Kloppenburg in the April 5 election. He said the outburst came after Abrahamson took steps to undermine him politically and to embarrass him and other court conservatives. “In the context of this, I said, ‘You are a total bitch,’ ” Prosser said. “I probably overreacted, but I think it was entirely warranted. . . . They (Abrahamson and Justice Ann Walsh Bradley) are masters at deliberately goading people into perhaps incautious statements. This is bullying and abuse of very, very long standing.” The Feb. 10, 2010, incident occurred as the court privately discussed a request to remove Justice Michael Gableman from a criminal case. “In a fit of temper, you were screaming at the chief; calling her a ‘bitch,’ threatening her with ‘. . . I will destroy you’; and describing the means of destruction as a war against her ‘and it won’t be a ground war,’ ” Bradley wrote in a Feb. 18, 2010, e-mail to Prosser and others. “In my view, a necessary step to address the dysfunction is to end these abusive temper tantrums. No one brought in from the outside is going to cure this aspect of the dysfunction.” Three days later, Justice Patience Roggensack wrote to Bradley, criticizing her for copying judicial assistants on her e-mail. Don’t you just love how the victims of his foulmouthed bullying are themselves painted as “bullies”? It’s the ‘Bloody Shirt’ principle in action, converting perpetrators into victims and vice versa. On FOX’ America’s Election HQ website, an article appears about Judge Prosser from 03/22 called : Collective Bargaining Appeal Takes Center Stage in Wisconsin Supreme Court Election which omits Prosser’s abusive actions altogether. What a shock. Our pal David Edwards adds some context to Prosser’s resume at Raw Story: The admission that he one called the chief justice a “bitch” follows a spotted history on women’s isssues. In 1990, while serving as a Wisconsin state Representative, Prosser argued that teen women would lie about being raped to get an abortion. As a Supreme Court justice in 2010, he voted to uphold a circuit court decision that said the City of Milwaukee’s Paid Sick Leave Ordinance did not adequately disclose that leave could be used related to domestic and sexual violence. While District Attorney of Outagamie County in 1979, Prosser had also refused to prosecute a priest that had allegedly sexually abused two children. “I was ready to take the stand,” Troy Merryfield, one of the abused children, told the Journal Sentinel years later . “He (Prosser) said it would be too embarrassing for a kid my age and said what jury would believe a kid testifying against a priest?” The conservative Prosser is facing Assistant Attorney General JoAnne Kloppenburg in a re-election battle which could change the makeup of the Wisconsin Supreme Court. The Kloppenburg campaign attacked Prosser after his spokesman admitted the justice would serve as a “complement” to Republican Gov. Scott Walker if re-elected. “This race is about returning independence and impartiality to the court,” Kloppenburg wrote in an op-ed for Madison.com. “It’s about electing justices who haven’t prejudged cases and who see the judiciary as a co-equal branch of government and a check and balance against overreaching by the executive and legislative branches, not as a ‘complement’ to their political agenda.” This Justice is up for reelection on April 5th, so let’s hope he goes down.

Continue reading …