This week the DCCC spent a quarter million dollars on media in the Buffalo suburbs to advance the candidacy of conservative Democrat Kathy Hochul. Hochul is certainly “better” than her opponent, GOP hack Jane Corwin — but does Hochul deserve that kind of expenditure? Her first TV ad starts with her throwing the immigrant community right under the bus. Still, she is a Democrat and that’s the DCCC’s job: elect Democrats — the good, the bad and the ugly. Blue America has a different mandate: we leave the bad and the ugly to the DCCC and try to lend a hand with the Good. Let’s see if anyone can find anyone better anywhere than our newest candidate, New Mexico state Senator Eric Griego. Kathy Hochul brags that she “led the fight” to prevent illegal immigrants from getting drivers’ licenses. Eric took a very different approach to the problem in his career. When New Mexico’s new Republican governor signed an executive order attempting to mimic the Arizona “Let me see your papers” law, Eric became the champion in the fight to oppose her. It was the most controversial and politically risky issue he had tackled. “She signed an Executive Order requiring state law enforcement to ask for immigration status for all ‘criminal suspects.’ I introduced legislation barring state and local law enforcement from ever asking about immigration status. I also led the fight against the repeal of drivers licenses for undocumented immigrants. The policy had been effect for several years and became an effective wedge issue for the new conservative Republican Governor and her cronies. In a rare showing of Democratic unity, the state senate thwarted the repeal of the drivers licenses.” A very different kind of Democrat than Kathy Hochul. And a very different kind of Democrat than the kind of conservative Big Business shill the DCCC is rumored to be recruiting to run against Eric for the Albuquerque seat opening up due to the departure of our old friend Martin Heinrich for the open U.S. Senate seat. Right now Eric’s only declared opponent is an extremist religious-fanatic, Republican pastor named Dan Lewis, who is hellbent on wrecking government regulations. The Albuquerque chapter of DFA first alerted us to Eric’s decision to run for the seat, describing him as “a hard-nosed progressive fighter for families, children and workers who’s ready, willing and able to take on the right wing attacks on education, Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid.” That’s the picture his record in public service paints. The first thing I ever heard him say was “The last thing we need to send to Washington is a Democrat who’s a kinder, gentler version of the Republicans, frankly.” Blue America has spent weeks talking with him since then. He’s exactly the kind of unapologetic progressive leader we need in Congress, an antidote to the dozens of Blue Dogs and conservatives always scurrying across the aisle to vote with the Republicans against the interests of working families and for their corporate donors. In contrast, Eric led efforts at the state level to do what our kind of Democrats are trying to do at the national level– “Before cutting core spending on kids, seniors and working families,” he told me passionately, “we should ask big oil and other corporate tax evaders to pay their fair share. We should also repeal the Bush tax cuts for those earning more than $250,000 a year. For the Republicans to defend subsidies for big oil is indefensible given their outrageous profits. To say taxes on the richest CEOs and multinational corporations are ‘off the table’ is outrageous when at the same time the Republican leadership is willing to ration Medicare, Medicaid and limit Social Security.” In the state legislature he sponsored several tax reform bills that would have raised personal income taxes on the wealthiest two percent of New Mexicans and to limit subsidies to large out of state corporations. The bills were killed by state Senate leaders. “In my first year in the Senate, I passed a green jobs bill that provides state-funded training for solar, wind and other renewable energy workers. That year [2008] and in 2011 I sponsored comprehensive ethics and campaign finance reform legislation including public financing for all state elections, contribution limits, and a state ethics commission. The ethics and campaign finance bills never got heard due to opposition from Senate leadership.” In 2005 Eric was behind the successful Albuquerque initiative to provide voluntary public financing for local elections. “We are now one of the few cities in the nation with public financing of local elections.” Kicking off his campaign a couple weeks ago, Eric told his supporters in Albuquerque why he’s the right man for the job. Those reasons resonate perfectly with Blue America: “We need a Democratic Congressional candidate who will unapologetically stand up for Democratic values. The current Republican leadership in Congress wants to dismantle the protections that it has taken generations to build, like Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. We need a strong courageous advocate for working families and who has a record of taking on those who put the interests of the richest two percent of Americans and the largest corporate interests ahead of our children, our environment and our local businesses.” If that kind of message appeals to you– and, by the way, I should mention that Eric is also the Executive Director of New Mexico Voices for Children, a non-profit research, policy and advocacy organization that fights for the state’s vulnerable children and working families– please consider making a donation to our newest endorsed candidate, Eric Griego.
Continue reading …The story of James Tate, the boy banned from prom for plastering an invitation on his school building, has spread virally across America—much like ridiculously choreographed dance moves spread across gym floors in prom movies. NewsFeed explains 10 reasons why Tate’s case has ignited the public (and why you’re looking at a picture of Harry
Continue reading …Departure underlines impasse of Israelis and Palestinians; Obama praises his role and earlier success in Northern Ireland The US Middle East peace envoy, George Mitchell, has resigned after failing to make any headway in resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. He is to be replaced by his deputy, David Hale, the White House said on Friday. Mitchell, age 77, was a central figure in securing peace in Northern Ireland, but has been unable to replicate that success in the Middle East. His departure underlines the lack of any immediate prospects for a resumption of serious negotiations between the Israelis and Palestinians. Such is the lack of any diplomatic movement that the envoy has not bothered visiting the region since December. In his letter of resignation to Barack Obama, he said his original intention had been to serve two years and he had done longer than that. Obama appointed him special envoy in January 2009, two days after his own inauguration, a time of widespread optimism that some of the world’s most intractable problems might be solved. “I strongly support your vision of comprehensive peace in the Middle East and thank you for giving me the opportunity to be part of your administration. It has been an honour for me to again serve our country,” Mitchell said. His resignation is effective from next Friday. Obama described Mitchell’s mission as “the toughest job imaginable” and praised him for leaving “a proud legacy of dedicated public service” both in Northern Ireland and in the Middle East. The White House insisted that his departure did not mean an end to Obama’s efforts to find a solution. Obama is scheduled to make a major speech on the Middle East next Thursday, but it is to be directed broadly, reaching out again to the Islamic world and the post-Osama bin Laden landscape, rather than focusing on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Secretary of state Hillary Clinton, joining in praise for Mitchell, said the state department would miss his “steady leadership and wise counsel”. She added: “We will carry forward his commitment to pursue a comprehensive peace in the Middle East.” The former senator established a reputation for skilful negotiation, patience and resilience when he successfully helped broker the Northern Ireland peace deal. Former president Bill Clinton sent him to the Middle East in 2000; he produced a report a year later calling on Israel to stop Jewish settler expansion in the West Bank and the Palestinians to end violence. Israel is at present refusing to negotiate with the new Palestinian unity government, citing the presence of Hamas. But even before that, there was almost no sign of any progress, with the Palestinians objecting in particular to Israel continuing to authorise settler expansion in the West Bank. The Israeli prime minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, is due to visit the US at the end of next week but no movement on peace negotiations is expected. As well as the politics of the Middle East, Mitchell had to contend with the internal politics of Washington, seeing much of his portfolio disappear when Obama appointed the veteran Middle East negotiator, Dennis Ross, to his national security team last year. Marina Ottaway, director of the Middle East programme at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, blamed a complex set of circumstances rather than anything Mitchell did or did not do, and accused Israel of inflexibility. “What is surprising is that he did not resign earlier … I do not think he ever had anything to work with. He did not have any cards to play.” Daniel Levy, co-director of the Middle East task force at the New America Foundation, said of Mitchell’s resignation: “Either he has advanced a certain approach that has not been taken up or, basically, that the chances of negotiation are diminishing by the day and he is not hanging about.” US foreign policy George Mitchell Middle East peace talks Israel Palestinian territories Middle East Northern Ireland Obama administration US politics United States Ewen MacAskill guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Click here to view this media While I commend Sen. John McCain for speaking out on the Senate floor this week condemning those who have come out since the death of Osama bin Laden defending the use of waterboarding — or as they want to call it, “enhanced interrogation” — and claiming that the torture somehow worked to gain intelligence, McCain is still on the wrong side of the issue with saying he doesn’t believe anyone should be prosecuted. Jonathan Turley rightfully pointed that out to Ed Schultz tonight. He also expressed his disdain for the Obama administration and Attorney General Eric Holder’s decision not to investigate and hold members of the Bush administration accountable for war crimes, which I share. TURLEY: One of the most powerful things about McCain’s speech is the truism that lies beneath it where he says, you know, being tortured is simply immoral. You know, I think much of the world is shocked by the debate that we’re having. This whole question of did it yield usable intelligence has long been rejected by the world and by the United States and its treaties as a viable argument for torture. Torture isn’t a war crime because it’s never beneficial. It’s a war crime because it’s immoral, because it is a war crime. And you can imagine how we look to the world in this debate when we have all of these officials who not only say that they ordered torture, but are trying to sell the American people on how good torture really is. I also always cynically wonder about John McCain’s political motivations any time he looks like he’s doing the right thing. While I have no doubt that his personal experience with being tortured as a prisoner of war has as much to do with him speaking out as anything, he also still really doesn’t have any use for any of the Bushies or George W. Bush after what they did to him when he ran against Bush for president and Karl Rove ran that whisper campaign against him in South Carolina . McCain always seems to have a penchant for doing the right thing if it means getting some digs in on his political enemies and ignoring wrong doings when it’s politically convenient as well . TPM has more on his Senate speech here: McCain Denounces Torture: ‘The Very Idea Of America’ Is At Stake (VIDEO) : Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) took to the Senate floor Thursday to condemn waterboarding and other torture techniques, saying that the debate over these techniques is ultimately “about morality. What is at stake here it the very idea of America.” In the time since Osama bin Laden was killed, a number of conservatives have sought to give credit for his death to George W. Bush, specifically for his decision to torture prisoners for information that they say ultimately led to bin Laden. McCain, who was tortured when he was a POW during the Vietnam War, has long been opposed to the interrogation methods implemented during the Bush Administration. He continued that he would oppose any legislation that would authorize a return to waterboarding or any other methods of interrogation that he believes “are torture, or cruel, inhuman, and degrading, and as such unworthy and injurious to our country.” McCain did offer some praise for those who implemented the techniques, saying that he understands why they were approved, “and I know that those who approved them, and those who employed them in the interrogation of captured terrorists were admirably dedicated to protecting the American people from harm.” He also added that he doesn’t believe anyone should be prosecuted for having used torture in the past . McCain expressed similar sentiments in his op-ed at The Washington Post here — Bin Laden’s death and the debate over torture . And here’s more from Turley’s blog from guest writer Lawrence Rafferty — Torture is still Torture, and it is Still Illegal.
Continue reading …Peers describe David Cameron’s intervention in case – after Kate McCann’s open letter to Sun – as PR exercise Two peers who are members of police watchdogs warned that the independence of the Metropolitan police was under threat after the prime minister brought in Scotland Yard to review the disappearance of Madeleine McCann. Insiders at the Yard played down any suggestions that their role could quickly lead to any breakthrough in the case, saying that the review, which will cost millions of pounds, could take months or even years. Labour’s Lord Harris, a member of the Metropolitan Police Authority, accused David Cameron of bowing to Rupert Murdoch’s empire, referring to Cameron’s decision to call in Scotland Yard after Kate McCann wrote an open letter in the Sun asking for his help. Lord Bradshaw, the Liberal Democrat peer and vice-chairman of Thames Valley Police Authority, added his voice to the criticism, describing the prime minister’s intervention as a PR exercise. “I am mightily worried about the politicisation of the police force. What appears on the face of it to be fairly innocuous orders – it’s a fairly short step from there to telling the police they have got to investigate this rather than that,” Bradshaw said. Harris said: “This … is entirely predictable in terms of the ‘pulling power’ of News International on Government policy … However, his [Cameron's] intervention drives a coach and horses through the draft protocol issued by the Home Office designed to preserve the operational independence of the police.” Writing on his blog , the peer added: “I can imagine that the senior leadership of the Metropolitan police are not exactly happy about this. It again embroils their officers in a high-profile investigation, where the chances of success are unclear, and which will divert limited investigative resources away from other matters.” In a statement Scotland Yard denied it had been ordered to review the abduction. It said that the commissioner, Sir Paul Stephenson, received a request which he considered and decided on balance that it was the best course to take. Kerry Needham, the mother of Ben Needham, the British toddler who was abducted on Crete 20 years ago, said: “I am pleased for the McCann family and look forward to the government offering the same support to all the families with children missing abroad.” If the Yard is given access to all the Portuguese documentation the first task will be to have it translated. As part of the review the Met’s team – likely to be led by a detective chief inspector within the homicide command – will also examine files held by Leicestershire police, the McCanns’ home force, who gave some help to the Portuguese officers. There is also documentation from a number of private investigators hired by the McCanns over the last four years. Although there was irritation among senior figures at Scotland Yard at being bounced into an inquiry, one source predicted that it would be quickly overtaken by a desire to do the best job possible. “It was political. But at the end of the day a child is missing.” The Met has a copy of a review into Madeleine’s disappearance completed by Jim Gamble, when he was head of Ceop, the child exploitation and online protection centre. It is understood to recommend that Scotland Yard be brought in to work with the Portuguese police on a review, but his report has been sitting on the home secretary’s desk for more than a year until this week with no action taken. Scotland Yard released the letter to Sir Paul from Theresa May on Thursday. In it the home secretary says diplomatic contact has been made with the Portuguese police, who have indicated they would co-operate with Scotland Yard. But she made clear it would be down to the Yard to negotiate the details. The McCanns repeated their thanks to Cameron, saying the Met’s involvement was a positive step. Madeleine McCann David Cameron Metropolitan police Police The Sun Sandra Laville guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …• Trainee Pakistan soldiers killed after graduation party • Two suicide bombers launch separate attacks within minutes When Osama bin Laden’s Pakistani supporters strike back, this is what it looks like: twisted metal, scattered suitcases and body parts; blood and savagery. The Taliban said the vicious double suicide bombing in Shabqadar, a trading town on the edge of the tribal belt in Charsadda district in north-western Pakistan, claimed the first part of the blood price they had promised to extract for the American killing of Bin Laden on 2 May. It was conducted with ruthless efficiency. Abid Khan, 24, cowered in his sweetshop when he heard the first blast and then, eight minutes later, a second. Rushing to the scene, he found some 200 trainee soldiers strewn on the road among mangled vans and a pile of bags. “It was very bad,” he said in slow, precise English. “Some people had no hand. Some people had no foot. Some heads were far away [from] the people.” He repeated himself. “It was very bad.” The dead and injured had been among 800 trainee soldiers partying just hours earlier with songs and music, having graduated into the ranks of the Frontier Corps, a poorly equipped paramilitary force drawn from the tribes of north-western Pakistan. They had just completed a six-month training course at the FC’s main training academy in Shabqadar – a British-era base with sweeping lawns and tree-lined drives – and came from districts that read like a roll-call of Taliban battlegrounds: Waziristan, Swat, Kohat, Lakki Marwat. But they barely made it out of the gate. As the young cadets left the base at 6am, clambering into buses and piling their luggage on top, a suicide bomber approached on foot then exploded his payload. More trainees rushed out to help the wounded. But eight minutes later a second bomber turned up, on a motorbike, exploding a vicious hail of ballbearings that sliced through shops, buses and flesh. By evening the death toll had reached 80, of whom 66 were FC recruits, with another 120 injured. The toll, as ever, was expected to rise. US officials are hoping to leverage outrage over Bin Laden to gain concessions from the Pakistani army. They want the military to push into Waziristan, to sever relations with militant groups such as the Haqqani network, and to arrest high-level fugitives thought to be still inside Pakistan, mostly notably Bin Laden’s deputy, Ayman al-Zawahiri, and the Taliban leader, Mullah Omar. Perhaps underscoring the drive, a CIA drone fired a missile at a car in North Waziristan, killing three people in the third such attack since Bin Laden’s death. The US embassy in Islamabad did not comment, but it did issue a statement condemning the Shabqadar attack as the work of the “true enemy of the people of Pakistan”. It’s still unclear whether the army, a past master at managing the tricky US relationship, will accede to any or all of Washington’s demands. But it is sensitive to an unprecedented wave of criticism in Islamabad, where the top brass made a rare address to parliament. The army chief, General Ashfaq Kayani, the chief of Pakistan’s Inter-Service Intelligence (ISI), General Ahmad Shuja Pasha, and at least three other top generals fielded questions from parliamentarians late into the evening in a session that was closed to the public. But some details leaked out – most intriguingly a claim by the country’s air chief that Shamsi airbase in Balochistan, used by the CIA to carry out drone attacks, is actually under the jurisdiction of the United Arab Emirates. But in Shabqadar, just a two-hour drive away, the repercussions of Bin Laden’s death — what one local termed the “Osama drama” – had a very real impact. The town centre was deserted, shuttered by police as the authorities cleaned up the blast site. A dozen Hiace mini-vans, crushed like tin cans, clustered outside the gates of the base. Blood-soaked rags littered the pavement. A policemen emerged from the wreckage with a fistful of ballbearings. “We are not afraid of the situation,” he said, a little unsteadily. “Everything is for Allah.” Hundreds of tiny holes pitted the shopfront behind him. A few provincial ministers came up from Peshawar, 30 miles to the south, offering soundbites for the cameras then departing in a whirl of flashing lights, horns and armoured cars. The scene was a reminder that, behind the spy games and hushed diplomatic shuffle, it is ordinary Pakistanis who have paid the price for their country’s part in the fight against militancy. Some 30,000 Pakistanis have died violently in the past decade, including 9,000 from the armed forces, according to official figures – 10 times the death toll in the US on 9/11. Commando instructor Gul Zaman, a burly man with a stone face, stood outside the crumbled barriers of the FC base, mourning his students. “They were all just young boys,” he said quietly. “Not one was over 25 years old.” A Taliban spokesman said the atrocity was the first revenge for the “martyrdom” of Bin Laden. “There will be more,” Ehsanullah Ehsan told Reuters. But senior police officials believe the bombing was more connected to the war in nearby Mohmand tribal agency, which starts just three miles from Shabqadar. Pakistan’s army has been fighting the Pakistani Taliban there for more than two years, as part of a series of rolling battles across the tribal belt. The fight is vicious. In December a Taliban suicide bomber killed at least 50 people at a public meeting; this week they assassinated one pro-government militiaman and kidnapped another. On Thursday a stray shell landed on a house in Mohmand, killing one person and wounding a woman and two children. People in Shabqadar can hear the artillery. But the suicide bombings were also a challenge to Pakistani politicians who want to spurn western assistance. A half-shredded poster at the blast site carried the image of Imran Khan, the cricketer turned politician who once advocated talks with the Taliban. His supporters, including many women, protested outside parliament as the generals spoke, carrying posters that read “What are you hiding?” The message echoed widespread skepticism among Pakistanis who, despite the blasts, continue to believe in astonishing numbers that the death of Bin Laden was concocted. “It was all just a drama. Osama wasn’t really there,” said taxi driver Hakimullah Jan in Shabqadar. “The Pakistani army and the Americans are just players in this Osama drama.” Caught between army hawks, a disbelieving public and an angry America, others simply feel beleaguered, as if their country has nowhere to turn. “So we are doomed if we side with militants and doomed if we don’t,” tweeted @ghamidiview, a follower of the moderate Islamic scholar Javed Ghamidi. As evening fell in Shabqadar, a small group of staff emerged from the base, which was still shuttered, to gather up the luggage in the street. One by one, they unrolled the dead soldiers’ belongings – bundles of bedding wrapped round piles of neatly folded, military jumpers. Then they quietly rolled them up again, and carried them back into the base. Pakistan Taliban Afghanistan Global terrorism al-Qaida Osama bin Laden Declan Walsh guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Dr John Vartanian E! Celebrity Plastic Surgery Stories Highlights.mov Celebrity Plastic Surgery Pictures Before and After Part 2 Celebrity Plastic Surgery Before and After Pictures Part 1 NeNe Leakes Tells Wendy Williams About Her Divorce, Liposuction … Readers pick worst celebrity plastic surgery OCRegister In an informal survey, readers of the “In Your Face” blog declared him the celebrity with the worst plastic surgery . The late singer, who repeatedly returned to plastic surgeons … The Worst Celebrity Plastic Surgery Excuses Ever | Wellness We’re all aware that plastic surgery’s less of a novelty than the world makes it seem – especially since Botox and collagen have dictated the aging process of a population afraid to grow old. (Age is fierce, guys – stop forgetting that. Bristol Palin's New Face! « Celebrity Plastic Surgery In the grand tradition of getting a nose job to “fix a deviated septum”, America’s original “teen mom” Bristol Palin has gotten plastic surgery for. Breast Reduction – Celebrity Plastic Surgery Kim Fields will always be known as Tootie Ramsey, the roller-skating darling with the mushroom perm, from the 1980s comedy ”The Facts of Life.” Viewers. Celebrity Plastic Surgery UNCUT!: Best Small Implants EVER! (IMO) Botox (38) breast augmentation (30) plastic surgery (15) Dr. Jennifer Walden (14) rhinoplasty (14) Celebrity plastic surgery (12) breast implants (11) dr jennifer walden (10) Kim Kardashian (8) facelift (8) Heidi Montag (7) Juvederm (7) … Zola27699 says: When Celebrity Plastic Surgery Has Gone Bad – Why Did it Happen? http://t.co/diacI4k
Continue reading …Aimed at older women and ‘casual gamers’, FarmVille has reaped a bumper crop of 60 million global users. No wonder Lady Gaga wants in Lady Gaga, pop supremo, wearer of meat dresses, the star who has sold more than 15m albums worldwide, announced on Wednesday that she is partnering with games company Zynga
Continue reading …Aimed at older women and ‘casual gamers’, FarmVille has reaped a bumper crop of 60 million global users. No wonder Lady Gaga wants in Lady Gaga, pop supremo, wearer of meat dresses, the star who has sold more than 15m albums worldwide, announced on Wednesday that she is partnering with games company Zynga
Continue reading …Article by WN.Com Correspondent Dallas Darling. Hidden in attics and cellars throughout the South and stored in forgotten boxes in museums, including the Library of Congress, are thousands of photographs showing both large and small jubilant and celebratory crowds that have gathered to watch blacks being lynched. Not only are many of the photos kept from the public’s view and mind, but they transcend centuries of America’s shameful political polices and racial intolerance against blacks and other minorities, like Jews, Catholics, Asians, and immigrants. Still, the photos, which were often made into postcards to be marketed and sold, reveal a sense of excitement, an air of anticipation, and…
Continue reading …