Republican contender says Barack Obama has ‘failed America’ as he formally launches bid – but still no word from Sarah Palin Former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney took on the mantle of Republican frontrunner after formally declaring his intention to seek the party’s nomination for the 2012 White House race. He identified America’s faltering economy as the key to beating Barack Obama, accusing him of having failed to deliver on 2008 campaign promises to turn the economy round. “Now, in the third year of his four-year term, we have more than slogans and promises to judge him by. Barack Obama has failed America.” Romney, who is ahead in polls of Republican voters, is hoping to consolidate his lead by disclosing next month that he outperformed his Republican rivals in fund-raising, having taken in tens of millions of dollars over the last three months. He has been campaigning informally for at least 12 months before making the official announcement in Stratham, New Hampshire, at Bittersweet Farm, a location that might turn out to be prophetic of his campaign. He came off second best to John McCain in the Republican race in 2008, in spite of spending $40 million of his own money, and faces formidable problems in 2012. He demonstrated again yesterday he is a poor speaker, with a fondness for cliches, and is viewed with suspicion by right-wingers on health, abortion, gay rights and gun laws. Christian evangelicals may be reluctant to back a Mormon. He could be vulnerable to a run by a populist candidate such as Sarah Palin, McCain’s running mate in 2008. Even though she says has not decided yet whether to join the Republican contest, she has dominated the media all week with a bus tour of the east coast. Palin, supposedly on a tour to promote US interest in the constitution, mischievously took her bus to New Hampshire yesterday, saying it was only coincidental that she would be there on the same day as Romney’s announcement. “Maybe we’ll run into him,” Palin said. While Obama is favourite to win in 2012, he is vulnerable to a strong Republican challenge, with the US economy slow to come out of recession. Unemployment is hovering around 9% and no US president since the 1930s has won a second term with figures that high. In his speech Romney admitted that the economy was in recession when Obama took office, but said he had made it worse and made it last longer. “Three years later, over 16 million Americans are out of work or have just quit looking. Millions more are underemployed. Three years later, unemployment is still above 8%, a figure he said his stimulus would keep from happening,” Romney said. The country was in crisis and he, as a successful businessman, was capable to the “bold” actions needed to resolve it, he said. He also attempted to woo Tea Party activists by promising to repeal Obama’s health reforms.”I will insist that Washington learns to respect the constitution … we will return responsibility and authority to the states for dozens of government programmes – and that begins with a complete repeal of Obamacare,” Romney said. Mitt Romney US elections 2012 Republicans United States US politics Barack Obama Sarah Palin Ewen MacAskill guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …I can’t quite believe that Rick Ungar is allowed to post this stuff on the Forbes blog, but he’s been doing it for awhile, so they must have noticed by now. This is some infuriating news , don’t you think? Instead of keeping their mouths shut and counting their blessings, they’re yelling for austerity cuts for the rest of us while they’re making money hand over fist: Yesterday, I wrote about how the GOP is falsely pushing the argument that America’s corporations are overtaxed. I included some great data courtesy of conservative commentator Bruce Bartlett whose New York Times piece did an extraordinary job of putting the lie to the Republican assertions. Today, and not a moment too soon, the non-profit Citizens For Tax Justice (CTJ) has put out their findings revealing that twelve of the nations largest Fortune 500 companies, while making $170 billion in profits during the period of The Great Recession, paid an effective tax rate of negative 1.5%. Yes, you read that correctly. Not only have these twelve companies paid zero in taxes for the years 2008-2010, they actually received tax subsidies that added $62.4 billion to their bottom lines.The companies were chosen by the CTJ to represent a range of industries, including manufacturing, energy, services, transportation and high tech and include – in alphabetical order – American Electric Power, Boeing, Dupont, Exxon Mobil, FedEx, General Electric, Honeywell International, IBM, United Technologies, Verizon Communications, Wells Fargo and Yahoo. Here are the bullet points presented by the report: From 2008 through 2010, these 12 companies reported $171 billion in pretax U.S. profits. But as a group, their federal income taxes were negative: –$2.5 billion. All but two of the dozen companies enjoyed at least one no-tax year over the 2008-10 period, despite reporting substantial pretax U.S. profits in those no-tax years. Eight of the twelve companies reported net tax benefits over the full three-year period. According to the study, not a single one of these companies paid an amount even close to the 35% statutory tax rate.
Continue reading …Barack Obama and Abraham Lincoln “are peas in the same pod,” at least in the eyes of Salon.com technology reporter Andrew Leonard . And just how exactly? Because “both [were] irredeemably stained by the hard fiscal decisions they had to make to save their nation,” Leonard argued in a June 2 “How the World Works” blog post. To do so, the Salon writer conflated loopy conspiracy theories about Lincoln having been a pawn of European Jewish bankers with complaints Obama faces from conservative and libertarian quarters regarding his spendthrift economic policies. Leonard seems to suggest there's little if any legitimate critique from the right on Obama's stewardship of federal finances (emphases mine): [I]f you dig a little deeper on the specific accusation that the Rothschild motivation for starting the Civil War was to take over the U.S. banking system, you suddenly find yourself facing a set of concerns that are surprisingly close to the surface of contemporary political discourse involving the national debt and monetary policy.
Continue reading …Who’s paying for Sarah Palin’s American bus tour? She doesn’t want to discuss it, and gets downright irritable when reporters ask. “I don’t know why in the world you would ask a question like that,” she snapped at an ABC News reporter. “I’m just thinking about America and our freedoms…
Continue reading …SarahPolicy says: What possibly could Donald Trump have told _Sarah Palin_ that could benefit America? Did Donald Trump take her to… http://dlvr.it/TmcZz
Continue reading …Andrew Breitbart isn’t the only right-winger out there creating false narratives about his targets through selective editing — indeed, this is a common practice at Fox News, too. But the real champion of selective editing — in quite a different fashion — is Matt Drudge. Instead of chopping up video, Drudge selectively edits tidbits of information from around the country to create narratives on his widely read Drudge Report website — narratives that, in fact, are often right-wing lies pandering to right-wing audiences. Recently, the narrative at Drudge has been this: Criminal young black men, freed to wanton abandon by the Black Panther-coddling Obama administration, are embarking on a retributive crime wave against white people. Alex Pareene at Salon calls him out : Since Obama actually took office, though, Drudge has seriously stepped up his “scary black people” coverage. There was, in September of 2009, the story he heavily publicized of a kid on a bus in Illinois getting beaten up. A kid on a bus in Illinois getting beaten up is not really national news — until Drudge makes it so. The fact that the beater was black and the victim white is why Drudge made it national news. Rush Limbaugh made the subtext explicit: “In Obama’s America, the white kids now get beat up with the black kids cheering.” This is the narrative that Drudge is trying to create, especially on slow news weekends when there’s nothing real to aggregate and post: The blacks are rising up and attacking the whites. If that sounds a bit crazy, in a Charles Manson way, then you’re obviously not paying attention. Black people are angry and they’re taking over! When Barack Obama was campaigning to win Chicago the Olympic games, Matt Drudge led with a terrifying photo of (black) gang violence and the breathless, all-caps headline, “OLYMPIC SPIRIT.” The violent death of a young man is definitely news … in Chicago, where it happened. It had very little to do with whether Chicago is a suitable venue for the Olympics. Violent murders happen in big cities and small towns across the nation every day. But only some of them can be used to stoke paranoia about emboldened, angry black people rising up. John at Gawker observes that this past weekend, there were 10 Drudge headlines supporting this narrative: Then be sure to check in with the Drudge Report, which has conveniently rounded up a slew of run-of-the-mill summer crime stories that happen to involve black people and suggestively weaved them into a nationwide race riot. … The race-baiting is a bit more transparent—”urban,” “rib fest”—than we’ve come to expect from Drudge, who is usually more elegant in his efforts to stoke white rage. All of Drudge’s readers in the media business, the cable news producers and Politico reporters who regard him as “America’s assignment editor,” know exactly what his intent is with those headlines. But instead of being dismissed as a racist weather-obsessed recluse he continues to be regarded as a power player in right-wing politics. Unsurprisingly, some of the wingnutosphere’s duller tools in the shed promptly leapt to Drudge’s defense by trotting out the classic right-wing stereotypes about blacks and crime — thereby clinching the case that what Drudge was doing was stirring up these resentments. F’r instance, Confederate Yankee : Pareene is a far left liberal that would like to embrace the childish fiction that all races and cultures are essentially the same. It’s a wonderful view to have when you’re ten. While individuals within these cultures can be anyone and achieve anything, it is a statistical fact that African-Americans are disproportionately responsible for crimes in this nation compared to any other ethnic group. They are also more likely to commit some of the more sensational crimes, such as the near riots and wildings that are the prime headline fodder that are Drudge’s bread and butter. If Pareene really wanted to make an impact, he’d spend his time and resources trying to find the reason for the statistical discrepancy that shows African-Americans are more prone to be criminals and victims of violent crime. Of course, he already knows the reason. It started with LBJ’s “Great Society,” and continued with the rise of Planned Parenthood and the destruction of the African-American family unit due to “progressive” social reforms. Oy. The stooooooopid, it burns. And then these same conservatives look hurt and amazed when people point out that their attitudes are deeply racist. Right-wingers like Jim Hoft never seem to understand that the correlation of crime with race is not a causal relationship — rather, the causal relationship is between poverty and crime. And black people are more likely to be impoverished in America than other races for a broad variety of reasons, many of them historical in nature, but including a number of ongoing factors: demographic segregation, job discrimination, and impoverishment of urban schools. There are many theories about race and crime in America — some of them promoted by white supremacists such as Jared Taylor and David Duke . As Amanda Marcotte at Pandagon observes: Drudge’s choice of what stories to highlight is about creating a narrative, and the insinuation is now that we have a black President, all hell is breaking loose. One of the weirdest, most long-standing conservative myths is that black people are aching to “rise up” and take the nation by force. The argument is then that they have to, more in sorrow than in glee, argue against equal rights for black people. They’d want to share, but you know, violence! The notion that black America is revenge-minded is something that is surprisingly powerful for wingnuts. That’s why there’s non-stop chatter on right wing radio about slavery reparations, even though the subject has no traction in real world discourse, and even if it did, said reparations would look much different than right wingers imagine it would like. (They’re picturing jack-booted thugs stealing your grandmother’s pearls and giving it to some family you don’t know to pawn, but it would more likely be a check that resembles a Social Security check or a tax refund.) And that’s why Andrew Breitbart thinks that some court settlement to black farmers who were systemically discriminated against for decades is the biggest problem our nation faces. Indeed, Drudge’s editorial choices tell us far more about him — and his many fans — than anything else.
Continue reading …Greta Van Susteren, who gets to go along for the ride on Sarah Palin’s bus tour, sat down with the potential 2012 presidential contender last night . Highlights: The bus tour was Todd’s idea : “He texted me … and said, You know, we need to remind America about our charters of…
Continue reading …Fiddle-playing, freedom-loving Founding Father Thomas Jefferson would not have been happy with the heavy-handed arrest of dancers at the Jefferson Memorial , writes Sarah Kaufman. It’s absurd to ban dancing in Jefferson’s name because not only was the third president fond of dancing himself, America owes its dance heritage to Jefferson’s…
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Rolling Stone has done a great piece about Fox News and its impact on this country. I love this excerpt: The result of this concerted campaign of disinformation is a viewership that knows almost nothing about what’s going on in the world. According to recent polls, Fox News viewers are the most misinformed of all news consumers. They are 12 percentage points more likely to believe the stimulus package caused job losses, 17 points more likely to believe Muslims want to establish Shariah law in America, 30 points more likely to say that scientists dispute global warming, and 31 points more likely to doubt President Obama’s citizenship. In fact, a study by the University of Maryland reveals, ignorance of Fox viewers actually increases the longer they watch the network. That’s because Ailes isn’t interested in providing people with information, or even a balanced range of perspectives. Like his political mentor, Richard Nixon, Ailes traffics in the emotions of victimization. “ What Nixon did – and what Ailes does today in the age of Obama – is unravel and rewire one of the most powerful of human emotions: shame ,” says Perlstein, the author of Nixonland. “He takes the shame of people who feel that they are being looked down on, and he mobilizes it for political purposes. Roger Ailes is a direct link between the Nixonian politics of resentment and Sarah Palin’s politics of resentment. He’s the golden thread.” Much of the article is similar to what John and Dave wrote about in “Over the Cliff”, but the Rolling Stone article reaches even farther. For example, Fox News has created a “fundraising juggernaut” for Republicans, which is what enabled Republicans to bounce back so hard after being trounced in 2008: But Ailes has not simply been content to shift the nature of journalism and direct the GOP’s message war. He has also turned Fox News into a political fundraising juggernaut. During her Senate race in Delaware, Tea Party darling Christine O’Donnell bragged, “I’ve got Sean Hannity in my back pocket, and I can go on his show and raise money.” Sharron Angle, the Tea Party candidate who tried to unseat Harry Reid in Nevada, praised Fox for letting her say on-air, “I need $25 from a million people – go to SharronAngle.com and send money.” Completing the Fox-GOP axis, Karl Rove has used his pulpit as a Fox News commentator to promote American Crossroads, a shadowy political group he founded, promising that the money it raised would be put “to good use to defeat Democrats who have supported the president’s agenda.” Just this morning, Fox and Friends ran four separate segments over their 3-hour time slot about Sarah Palin. They didn’t stop there, though. There were 3 segments on Chris Christie, and an interview with Michele Bachmann where she got to play coy about her upcoming “major announcement” in Waterloo, Iowa. Then they pivoted to a Palin vs. Bachmann narrative for the last hour. Anyone with half a brain knows Sarah Palin isn’t going to run for President. She is just the next Donald Trump lined up to keep wingnut engagement high while the candidates jockey for funding and position. Kaili Joy Gray at Daily Kos has it right: So you can all hop off the Palin Paparazzi Tour of 2011, go back to your air-conditioned offices, sit back, and let her show off her savvy “new social media” skills on Twitter and Facebook—and Fox “News”—and then mock the holy hell out of her for being a fucking idiot. That’s all. That is the sum total of the amount and kind of attention she deserves. You don’t have to treat her like a serious presidential candidate, or even a serious person. Despite her protestations that she doesn’t want media attention, she’s starving for it. Hell, she quit her job as governor just so she could devote herself full-time to getting you to give her attention in the pages of your Very Serious papers. This is our Very Serious Political Media. The Beltway Boys. Today’s hot stories include more Breitbart mania, Palin, Bachmann and Christie. This is because they do not really want anyone to think about how Republicans are trying to force a financial crisis on this country by holding a faux debt ceiling vote today which will fail without Very Serious Spending Cuts, or how cynical it is to cry wolf over the national debt while refusing to raise revenues to cover it. They don’t want us to keep talking about the Paul Ryan plan to destroy Medicare, or how they’d love to kill Social Security and Medicare with one smooth debt ceiling stone. So instead we get Palin, Bachmann, and a world turned upside down over absolutely…nothing.
Continue reading …