While using Google+, senior Google engineer Steve Yegge accidentally shared a post heavily criticizing the company’s social networking service with the general public instead of just his co-workers, the Huffington Post reports. He described Google+ as an example of the company’s “complete failure to understand platforms,” calling it “a knee-jerk…
Continue reading …Surfer finds himself standing on the thrashing shark off the coast of Oregon as he tries to catch a wave Doug Niblack was trying to catch another wave before going to work when his longboard hit something hard as rock off the Oregon coast and he found himself standing on the back of a thrashing great white shark. Looking down, he could see a dorsal fin in front of his feet as he stood on what he described as three metres (10ft) of back as wide as his surfboard and as black as his own Neoprene wetsuit. A tail thrashed back and forth and the water churned around him. “It was pretty terrifying just seeing the shape emerge out of nothing and just being under me,” he told the Associated Press on Wednesday. “And the fin coming out of the water. It was just like the movies.” The several seconds Niblack spent on the back of the great white on Monday off Seaside, Oregon, was a rare encounter, but not unprecedented, according to Ralph Collier, president of the Shark Research Committee in Canoga Park, California, and director of the Global Shark Attack File in Princeton, New Jersey. He said he had spoken to a woman who was kayaking off Catalina Island, California, in 2008 when a shark slammed her kayak from underneath and sent her flying into the air. She then landed on the back of the shark, Collier said. “At that point the shark started to swim out to sea, so she jumped off its back,” Collier said. US Coast Guard Lieutenant JG Zach Vojtech said officials did not officially log shark encounters, but he had learned about Niblack’s ordeal from an off-duty member who was nearby when he was knocked from his board. Jake Marks, the Coast Guard member, said he never saw the shark, but witnessed Niblack suddenly standing up, with water churning around him. He said he joined Niblack in paddling as fast as he could for shore after seeing a large shape swimming between them just beneath the surface. “I have no reason to doubt there was a shark out there,” said Marks. “With the damage to his board, the way he was yelling and trembling afterwards – there is no other explanation for that.” Niblack thinks he was standing on the shark for no more than three or four seconds when the shark went out from beneath him. The dorsal fin caught his board and dragged him for about a metre by his ankle tether. “I’m just screaming bloody murder,” he said. “I’m just yelling: ‘Shark!’ I thought for sure I was gone.” In six years of surfing, Niblack said he had seen sharks in the water, but never so close. He said he had been dreaming about sharks, but was planning to go back out to surf. When he does he will take a waterproof video camera his roommate gave him. He has also put a sticker on the bottom of his board to ward off sharks – a shark with a red circle and a slash over it. “I’ll definitely go back out,” he said. “It’s just the surf sucks right now. I’ll wait until that gets better, then go back out.” Wildlife Surfing United States guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Two women working for Médecins sans Frontières at Dadaab camp believed to have been taken by Somali insurgents Gunmen in Kenya have kidnapped two aid workers from the Dadaab refugee camp near the Somalian border. Kenyan police say they suspect that Somalia’s al-Shabaab insurgents, who have links with al-Qaida, took the two women, who were working for Médecins sans Frontières (MSF). Police have sealed the border between the two countries. “Two female aid workers working for MSF were this afternoon kidnapped by suspected al-Shabaab militants in Dadaab refugee camp in Garissa,” the North Eastern province’s police commander, Leo Nyongesa, told Reuters. “We’ve mobilised all the officers and alerted those at the border to ensure that no vehicle exits the country to Somalia. The whole border area is now sealed,” he said. MSF confirmed the attack on its staff on Thursday morning and said a driver had been injured. “He’s currently hospitalised and stable. Two international staff are missing. A crisis team has been set up to deal with this incident,” a statement said. The kidnapping follows earlier separate incidents in which two western female tourists were snatched from beach resorts in northern Kenya and taken to Somalia. Dadaab was set up in 1991 to house Somalis fleeing violence in their country. It has since grown to become the world’s biggest refugee camp with more than 400,000 residents. Kenya Africa Somalia Global terrorism Aid guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …President Obama scored a victory with the passage of a trio of free-trade pacts yesterday, marking America’s biggest trade expansion in nearly 20 years. The House and Senate both approved the pacts with South Korea, Colombia, and Panama. While the Latin American pacts may have little impact, the South Korean…
Continue reading …Home secretary Theresa May backs police power to declare no-go areas for first time since Riot Act was repealed The police will be given a public order power allowing them to clear the streets and tell the public to leave an area during a riot or other disorder, under proposals for curfews outlined by the Home Office. The power entitles a police superintendent to declare a specific district a public “no go” area for a limited time – for the first time since the Riot Act was removed from the statute book for England and Wales in 1973. A Home Office consultation paper published on Thursday stops short of making it a criminal offence to be outdoors in a curfew zone, but says it would be an offence to refuse a police instruction to leave the area. It leaves open the question of what penalty might be imposed. The plan, which has the backing of the home secretary, Theresa May, is published alongside proposals to give the police stronger powers to order rioters and protesters to remove face masks, and for the police to impose curfews on individuals as part of a conditional caution. The consultation paper also includes a controversial proposal to remove the word “insulting” from section 5 of the 1986 Public Order Act, which makes it an offence for the public to use words likely to cause harassment, alarm or distress. The measure has been used recently against Christian street-preachers who were arguing that homosexuality was sinful, against a teenager who claimed Scientology was a dangerous cult, and against an Oxford University student who told a mounted police officer his horse was gay. Liberal Democrat MPs have been pressing for section 5 to be repealed for undermining free speech, though the mayor of London, Boris Johnson, wants it retained to ensure that anyone who insults police officers can be prosecuted. The crime and security minister, James Brokenshire, said it was essential to give the police all necessary legal powers to enable them to maintain public order, protect the streets and keep the public safe. “But we must also make sure any new powers do not trample upon traditional British freeedoms – that is why we are seeking public views on the powers the police really need to keep our communities safe,” he said. Civil liberties campaigners were appalled by the proposed curfew powers. Isabella Sankey, the policy director of Liberty, said: “Whatever happened to the ‘civil liberties’ coalition that abolished ID cards and sought to restore rights and freedoms? It’s all gone cat-flaps and curfews. As a result of Liberty’s victory in the court of human rights , government is reforming blanket stop-and-search powers. How on earth will blanket powers to impose curfews on peacetime Britain cut the mustard against the same tests of legality and proportionality?” The consultation paper says the aim of the proposed general curfew power would be to keep the public off the streets in a given location, for a given period of time, to prevent or address serious disorder. The paper says: “This could be used instead of dispersal powers in situations that could potentially involve large numbers of people, or where the police need to empty an area of people quickly for safety and security reasons.” The Home Office envisages a senior police officer taking the decision to clear streets based on “credible intelligence of a serious threat of such disorder in that place and at that time”. The paper recognises that it would be necessary to give appropriate notice to people within the curfew zone and to make arrangements for those who need to be outside for justifiable reasons, such as emergency workers. This move evokes a historical parallel with the 1714 Riot Act, which was last “read” in England in 1919 and was repealed in 1973. The paper states that there would need to be independent oversight of the use of the power. But while prior judicial approval could be necessary, it acknowledges that there will be circumstances where that is not possible. Police Theresa May UK civil liberties UK riots Stop and search Kettling Alan Travis guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Nearly 30,000 had to wait for treatment for longer than NHS target in August, a rise of 48% on previous year The number of patients waiting more than the recommended maximum of 18 weeks to be treated by the NHS has soared by almost half since last year, official data shows . A total of 28,635 patients in England who were treated in an NHS hospital during August had been waiting more than 18 weeks, compared with 19,355 in the same month in 2010 – a rise of 48%. The figures, released by the Department of Health, confirm that despite repeated ministerial pledges that the NHS would stick to waiting time targets despite growing financial pressure, the number of people having to wait beyond the department’s own recommended maximum time is rising. The 28,635 is the largest number since the coalition came to power last year, when the health secretary, Andrew Lansley, reviewed or eased several NHS waiting time targets. The data also shows that 45 hospital trusts failed to meet the 18-week target in August, compared with 18 in May 2010, the month the coalition took office. The 28,635 who waited more than 18 weeks in August represented 11.3% of all the patients treated that month, whereas the 19,355 in the same position in August 2010 were 7.1% of that month’s total. Andy Burnham, Labour’s shadow health secretary, said: “The figures published today are yet more evidence that David Cameron has put our NHS in the danger zone. “After years of improvement under Labour, more patients have had to wait longer for treatment since David Cameron came to power. “It is particularly alarming that 45 trusts are now missing the target for 90% of patients treated within 18 weeks.” The Patients Association said the latest figures showed that Cameron had not honoured his personal pledge, made earlier this year, to ensure that the 18-week target was met. Treatment within 18 weeks is enshrined in the NHS constitution. However, the Department of Health said that while the number of inpatients waiting more than 18 weeks had risen, the proportion treated within that time was 90.4%, just over the 90% target. The biggest year-on-year rises were seen in trauma and orthopaedics, in which 23.2% of patients in August had waited more than 18 weeks, up from 12.6% a year earlier. In neurosurgery, 20.2% of treated patients had waited at least 18 weeks, up from 7.9%; and in ear, nose and throat treatment, 13.2% of those treated in August had waited that long, compared with 8% a year before. A total of 301,245 NHS patients were treated during August. Of those, 281,569 were treated in an NHS hospital and the other 19,676 by an independent provider, at the NHS’s expense. The department said the NHS had stuck to its two targets in August of treating at least 90% of inpatients and 95% of outpatients within 18 weeks. Although the crucial 90% standard was missed last spring, possibly due to the usual winter pressures on the health service, it was 90.4% in August. Some 97.3% of outpatients were treated, above the 95% target. But Thursday’s data for outpatients shows that 23,511 patients in August had been waiting over 18 weeks, 38.6% more than a year ago. That number represents 2.7% of the total, compared with 2.0% in August 2010. Burnham said Labour’s analysis showed that since the election, a total of 378,850 more patients have waited longer than the guarantees for treatment as inpatients or in A&E, compared with the equivalent period under Labour. Katherine Murphy, the Patients Association’s chief executive, said: “Their [the department's] own figures show that the number of people waiting for longer than 18 weeks for treatment has increased by a shocking 48% since August 2010. Over a tenth of patients are now waiting for longer than 18 weeks to be treated. “The prime minister made a personal promise to ensure that the right to be treated within 18 weeks, enshrined in the NHS constitution, was upheld. He has utterly failed to live up to that promise. The £20bn of so-called ‘efficiency savings’ being demanded of the NHS are bringing the health service to its knees. Yet £1m is still being thrown away every single day on a reform plan that is opposed by doctors, nurses, patients and NHS managers .” Patients unable to have a hip or knee operation or surgery to remove cataracts were among the most frequent callers to the association’s helpline, Murphy said. The data relates to NHS consultant-led “referral to treatment” (RTT) waiting times. A Department of Health spokesman said that the number of people on the waiting list for treatment in England, a separate measure of the NHS’s performance, had fallen from 2.65 million in August 2010 to 2.61 million this August, a drop of 40,000 patients. The Department of Health said: “Average waiting times are low and remain stable. The vast majority of patients still receive treatment within 18 weeks. “We are committed to driving improvements in performance and the quality of care that the NHS provides – including keeping waiting times low.” Dr Mark Porter, chair of the British Medical Association’s consultants committee, said: “The rise in waiting times is one of the consequences of the huge financial strains on the NHS. It is cause for serious concern. As well as the obvious distress caused to patients, longer waiting times can decrease the likelihood of treatments being effective. There are also financial consequences for individual hospital trusts, which are losing funding as a result of the pressures on the NHS to reduce activity. “There has been an assumption that savings in the NHS can be achieved through greater efficiency, and that levels of activity can be maintained. Instead of this happening, services are being cut or downgraded to reduce costs, risking a reduction in the quality of service to patients.” NHS Public services policy Health policy Conservatives David Cameron Liberal Democrats Denis Campbell James Ball guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …The number of Americans filing first-time claims for jobless benefits inched down last week, but remains high. Four hundred and four thousand people filed initial unemployment claims, the Labor Department said. That’s down by just 1000 from last week. Analysts had predicted a slightly bigger decline, to around 401,000. Economists say that with weekly claims
Continue reading …Shawnee County District Attorney Chad Taylor announced Wednesday that he will resume prosecuting domestic battery and other misdemeanors in Topeka, Kan., after a national outcry from domestic violence activists. Taylor announced on Sept. 8 that due to budget cuts, he would not longer prosecute Topeka’s misdemeanors. Topeka city council members said they did not have
Continue reading …