David Attenborough’s latest TV series, Frozen Planet, is being heralded as his take on climate change. Now 85, he explains why – finally – he’s speaking out on the issue, and shares the joys of a long life spent filming sex and death in the wild ‘I’m not a propagandist, I’m not a polemicist; my primary interest is just looking at and trying to understand how animals work,” says David Attenborough. We are talking in a gigantic BBC sitting room. Attenborough, wearing slacks, shirt and jacket, is a trifle unkempt at 85,
Continue reading …Losing candidate in 2008 mayoral election says he was threatened after suggesting rival’s relative may have been a spy Ken Livingstone has claimed Boris Johnson threatened to “punch his lights out” during the last mayoral campaign, after Livingstone had suggested his rival’s Turkish great-grandfather might have been a British spy. In his autobiography, published on Monday, Livingstone chronicles the mounting tension during the 2008 mayoral race. Publication comes months before he faces a rematch with Johnson at the 2012 mayoral election in May. In the book, titled You Can’t Say That, Livingstone dismisses his Tory rival as a politician used to “getting away with it” through humour when responding to difficult policy questions. But he says Johnson’s “mask slipped” a couple of times during the campaign. Livingstone recounts an appearance on the BBC’s Question Time with Johnson: “After Question Time the cameras were still on us as a smiling Boris draped his arm around my shoulders and said, ‘If you carry on talking about my great-grandfather I’m going to punch your lights out.’” The veteran politician also reveals he thought he would have to stand down in the run-up to the last mayoral campaign because of a cancer scare, and cried as he cleared his office after losing to Johnson. In a book which sheds little light on his emotional life, Livingstone alludes to being “down and depressed” during the 2008 mayoral race and, despite his political experience, says he was “still shocked” by the way the “right wing” threw everything at the campaign. Livingstone refuses to concede any major mistakes during his time as mayor. He blames defeat on the recession, an unpopular government and the media, singling out the Evening Standard – under the editorship of Veronica Wadley – for the campaign it ran against him that alleged corruption in his office. The allegations were unsubstantiated. He complains that he felt like a “non person” at City Hall after losing. “My first experience of Boris’s pettiness came when I turned up at City Hall to discover my security pass had been blocked and I was only to be allowed in the building if accompanied by an official,” he says. Livingstone, the son of working-class Conservative parents, also highlights what he believes to be the advantage gained by Johnson’s privileged background in the eyes of the media, where “one rule applies for Boris and his class and another one for the rest of us”. Livingstone, who has often championed policies and causes long before they were accepted by the mainstream, tells the Guardian that the animosity he has attracted over the years is down to being a working class person in a profession now “exclusively middle class, reported through the prism of a media that is exclusively middle class. And I think it’s because they see me as an effective socialist. “They’re used to Labour politicians who come into office and end up being a tame pussycat, or being totally ineffectual. They’re quite used to ones that they can seduce or buy off, or are incompetent. They wouldn’t mind me if I was useless and they wouldn’t mind me if I was a hireling. But I don’t make the compromises they always want me to.” Living up to its title, the book is interspersed with tracts about Livingstone’s uncompromising views on controversial issues such as Israel, which are likely to raise eyebrows in senior Labour ranks. His says views were formed in the 1980s after reading up the history of Zionism and from that point on: “I was not going to be silenced by smears of antisemitism whenever I criticised Israeli government policies.” Despite his staunch criticism about New Labour under Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, he reveals that he tipped off Brown, via his ally Ed Balls, after he was asked by the Labour peer Margaret McDonagh to lead the call for Brown’s resignation as premier. “For all my doubts about Brown I wasn’t going to help hand the party back to the Blairites so I phone Ed Balls on his mobile to warn him.” After he had lost mayoral office, Livingstone says that Brown called him to commiserate. “He seemed genuinely upset, but whether this was because I was losing or that my loss might open up a leadership challenge to him wasn’t clear”. Livingstone also reveals that he decided not to have children because of his “dysfunctional childhood” and his anxiety that he would not be a good parent. Despite this, he has fathered five children. He suggests that he offered to father two children (both daughters) with a local newspaper journalist, and one (a son) with a political activist, because their biological clocks were ticking and they had no partner at the time. He claims to have pre-arranged the role he would play in their lives, but does not describe how this was received by his partner at the time, Kate Allen. Livingstone later had two children with Emma Beal, whom he married in 2009. A spokesperson for Boris Johnson said: “Any allegations like this in Ken Livingstone’s autobiography should be viewed in the context of his candidacy for the mayoralty next year.” He also reveals that during his time as mayor, he thought his phone was being bugged by MI5, despite the insistence of Eliza Manningham Buller, then MI5 chief, to the contrary. He said at the time didn’t believe her as he often picked up the home phone immediately after finishing a call and heard a playback of his conversation. “However, given the Guardians 2009 expose of phone tapping by newspapers, I may have blamed the wrong culprit.” Ken Livingstone Boris Johnson London Hélène Mulholland guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …President says ‘America’s war in Iraq will be over’ with decision to pull all troops from Iraq by the end of the year President Barack Obama on Friday declared an end to the Iraq war by announcing that all American troops would be withdrawn from the country by year’s end. Obama’s statement put an end to months of wrangling over whether the US would maintain a force in Iraq beyond 2011. He never mentioned the tense and ultimately fruitless negotiations with Iraq over whether to keep several thousand US forces there as a training force and a hedge against meddling from Iran or other outside forces. Instead, Obama spoke of a promise kept, a new day for a self-reliant Iraq and a focus on building up the economy at home. “I can report that, as promised, the rest of our troops in Iraq will come home by the end of the year,” Obama said. “After nearly nine years, America’s war in Iraq will be over.” Obama spoke after a private video conference with Iraqi prime minister Nouri al-Maliki, and he offered assurances that the two leaders agreed on the decision. The US military presence in Iraq stands at just under 40,000. All US troops are to exit the country in accordance with a deal struck between the countries in 2008 when George Bush was president. Obama, an opponent of the war from the start, took office and accelerated the end of the conflict. In August 2010, he declared the US combat mission over. “Over the next two months our troops in Iraq, tens of thousands of them, will pack up their gear and board convoys for the journey home,” Obama said. “The last American soldier will cross the border out of Iraq with their heads held high, proud of their success and knowing that the American people stand united in our support for our troops.” More than 4,400 American military members have been killed since the US and its allies invaded Iraq in March 2003. The Associated Press first reported last week that the United States would not keep troops in Iraq past the year-end withdrawal deadline, except for some soldiers attached to the US embassy. Denis McDonough, the White House’s deputy national security adviser, said that in addition to the standard Marine security detail, the US will also have 4,000 to 5,000 contractors to provide security for US diplomats, including at the US embassy in Baghdad and US consulates in Basra and Erbil. In recent months, Washington had been discussing with Iraqi leaders the possibility of several thousand American troops remaining to continue training Iraqi security forces. Throughout the discussions, Iraqi leaders refused to give US troops immunity from prosecution in Iraqi courts, and the Americans refused to stay without that guarantee. Moreover, Iraq’s leadership has been split on whether it wanted American forces to stay. When the 2008 agreement requiring all US forces to leave Iraq was passed, many US officials assumed it would inevitably be renegotiated so that Americans could stay longer. The US said repeatedly this year it would entertain an offer from the Iraqis to have a small force stay behind, and the Iraqis said they would like American military help. But as the year wore on and the number of American troops that Washington was suggesting could stay behind dropped, it became increasingly clear that a US troop presence was not a sure thing. The issue of legal protection for the Americans was the deal-breaker. But administration officials said they feel confident that the Iraqi security forces are well prepared to take the lead in their country. McDonough said assessment after assessment of the preparedness of Iraqi forces concluded that “these guys are ready; these guys are capable; these guys are proven; importantly, they’re proven because they’ve been tested in a lot of the kinds of threats that they’re going to see going forward. “So we feel very good about that.” Pulling troops out by the end of this year allows both Maliki and Obama to claim victory. Obama kept a campaign promise to end the war, and Maliki will have ended the American presence and restored Iraqi sovereignty. The president used the war statement to once again turn attention back to the economy, the domestic concern that is expected to determine whether he wins re-election next year. “After a decade of war the nation that we need to build and the nation that we will build is our own, an America that sees its economic strength restored just as we’ve restored our leadership around the globe.” US foreign policy Barack Obama Iraq US military Middle East guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …President says ‘America’s war in Iraq will be over’ with decision to pull all troops from Iraq by the end of the year President Barack Obama on Friday declared an end to the Iraq war by announcing that all American troops would be withdrawn from the country by year’s end. Obama’s statement put an end to months of wrangling over whether the US would maintain a force in Iraq beyond 2011. He never mentioned the tense and ultimately fruitless negotiations with Iraq over whether to keep several thousand US forces there as a training force and a hedge against meddling from Iran or other outside forces. Instead, Obama spoke of a promise kept, a new day for a self-reliant Iraq and a focus on building up the economy at home. “I can report that, as promised, the rest of our troops in Iraq will come home by the end of the year,” Obama said. “After nearly nine years, America’s war in Iraq will be over.” Obama spoke after a private video conference with Iraqi prime minister Nouri al-Maliki, and he offered assurances that the two leaders agreed on the decision. The US military presence in Iraq stands at just under 40,000. All US troops are to exit the country in accordance with a deal struck between the countries in 2008 when George Bush was president. Obama, an opponent of the war from the start, took office and accelerated the end of the conflict. In August 2010, he declared the US combat mission over. “Over the next two months our troops in Iraq, tens of thousands of them, will pack up their gear and board convoys for the journey home,” Obama said. “The last American soldier will cross the border out of Iraq with their heads held high, proud of their success and knowing that the American people stand united in our support for our troops.” More than 4,400 American military members have been killed since the US and its allies invaded Iraq in March 2003. The Associated Press first reported last week that the United States would not keep troops in Iraq past the year-end withdrawal deadline, except for some soldiers attached to the US embassy. Denis McDonough, the White House’s deputy national security adviser, said that in addition to the standard Marine security detail, the US will also have 4,000 to 5,000 contractors to provide security for US diplomats, including at the US embassy in Baghdad and US consulates in Basra and Erbil. In recent months, Washington had been discussing with Iraqi leaders the possibility of several thousand American troops remaining to continue training Iraqi security forces. Throughout the discussions, Iraqi leaders refused to give US troops immunity from prosecution in Iraqi courts, and the Americans refused to stay without that guarantee. Moreover, Iraq’s leadership has been split on whether it wanted American forces to stay. When the 2008 agreement requiring all US forces to leave Iraq was passed, many US officials assumed it would inevitably be renegotiated so that Americans could stay longer. The US said repeatedly this year it would entertain an offer from the Iraqis to have a small force stay behind, and the Iraqis said they would like American military help. But as the year wore on and the number of American troops that Washington was suggesting could stay behind dropped, it became increasingly clear that a US troop presence was not a sure thing. The issue of legal protection for the Americans was the deal-breaker. But administration officials said they feel confident that the Iraqi security forces are well prepared to take the lead in their country. McDonough said assessment after assessment of the preparedness of Iraqi forces concluded that “these guys are ready; these guys are capable; these guys are proven; importantly, they’re proven because they’ve been tested in a lot of the kinds of threats that they’re going to see going forward. “So we feel very good about that.” Pulling troops out by the end of this year allows both Maliki and Obama to claim victory. Obama kept a campaign promise to end the war, and Maliki will have ended the American presence and restored Iraqi sovereignty. The president used the war statement to once again turn attention back to the economy, the domestic concern that is expected to determine whether he wins re-election next year. “After a decade of war the nation that we need to build and the nation that we will build is our own, an America that sees its economic strength restored just as we’ve restored our leadership around the globe.” US foreign policy Barack Obama Iraq US military Middle East guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Three leopards, a grizzly bear and two monkeys are the only animals that remain alive after Ohio authorities used high-powered rifles to hunt down dozens of exotic animals released by a farm owner near Zanesville on Tuesday. The owner killed himself after letting the creatures loose, police say. The surviving animals are being held at
Continue reading …Three leopards, a grizzly bear and two monkeys are the only animals that remain alive after Ohio authorities used high-powered rifles to hunt down dozens of exotic animals released by a farm owner near Zanesville on Tuesday. The owner killed himself after letting the creatures loose, police say. The surviving animals are being held at
Continue reading …Three leopards, a grizzly bear and two monkeys are the only animals that remain alive after Ohio authorities used high-powered rifles to hunt down dozens of exotic animals released by a farm owner near Zanesville on Tuesday. The owner killed himself after letting the creatures loose, police say. The surviving animals are being held at
Continue reading …Early this summer, Groupon was aiming to raise $750 million in its initial public offering; now, it expects to raise no less than $480 million but no more than $540 million from the sale of 30 million shares, the AP reports. In a tough market for stock offerings, the firm…
Continue reading …President Obama’s first attempt to split his American Jobs Act into smaller bites did not go well: His $35 billion package, intended to protect the jobs of teachers and first responders, was blocked in the Senate last night. Democrats couldn’t get the 60 votes needed to move the bill forward;…
Continue reading …Wen Jiabao lectures EU leaders on the need for structural reform but they will make no decision until summit next week America and China, the world’s two economic superpowers, have again urged EU leaders to resolve the eurozone’s sovereign debt crisis and prevent the world from sliding into another slump. As it emerged that no decisions would be taken by European leaders until an unprecedented second eurozone summit next Wednesday, Chinese premier Wen Jiabao told EU leaders to stop the debt crisis spreading and lectured them on the need for structural reform. His outspoken comments, in a phone call with Herman Van Rompuy, the European council president, came after Brussels cancelled an EU-China summit planned for Wednesday and hours after Barack Obama had a transatlantic video conference call with the French president, Nicolas Sarkozy, and German chancellor, Angela Merkel. Wen told Van Rompuy: “The most urgent task is to take decisive measures to prevent the debt crisis spreading further and avoid financial market turbulence, a recession and fluctuations in the euro.” Britain’s chancellor, George Osborne, said before Saturday’s meeting of the 27 EU finance ministers: “The coming days will be critical for resolving the crisis in the eurozone. I am convinced of everyone’s commitment to this. A resolution to the eurozone crisis would be the biggest boost to growth in Britain and around the world.” But Europe’s leaders continued to feud in public and private over the reasons for twice delaying final decisions, with France and Germany still at loggerheads over fundamental issues and Italy and Spain, let alone Greece, under severe pressure to fix their budgets as all of them slash economic growth forecasts for 2012. Arriving for a meeting of eurogroup finance ministers, Jean-Claude Juncker, the group’s chairman and veteran Luxembourg premier, admitted that the outside impression given by the EU was “disastrous”. He said: “It does not appear a bright example of superior statesmanship.” On the uppermost floor of the Berlaymont, the European commission’s HQ, the talk was of how Merkel and Sarkozy had in effect sabotaged Sunday’s summit by insisting on taking all the decisions themselves. “Previously, 90% of decisions were taken before the summit, and now everything has to be decided at the summit table.” Merkel was accused of failing to realise until it was too late that too much work remained to be done to ensure a successful summit. But in Berlin government sources attacked foot dragging by senior officials preparing the dossiers, including a key report on the sustainability of Greek debt promised for Wednesday morning and still unavailable on Friday. As Juncker cancelled a planned news conference after the eurogroup meeting, it emerged that the only agreement reached so far on the three core issues was on recapitalising Europe’s 60 or 70 “systemic” banks. They are now said to require capital buffers of around €80bn-€90bn to withstand exposure to potential debt defaults. The ratings agency Standard & Poors calculated that 21 of the 47 banks it had sampled might need €91bn under the “stress test” of a double-dip recession. This proposal is expected to be approved by the 27 finance ministers on Saturday and formally signed off by the EU-27 summit on Sunday, but France still insists that its banks be given as much as nine months to meet the new 9% capital ratio target as it fights to defend its AAA credit rating. Government sources in Berlin sought to play down differences with Paris on the two outstanding issues of how and by how much to “leverage” the eurozone’s main bailout find, the European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF), and the scale of the losses, or “haircuts”, private creditors should suffer as the price for restructuring Greek debt and giving final approval to the second bailout package of €109bn (£95bn) for Greece. Insisting that disagreements between Germany and France were on purely technical questions, the sources said the two agreed on the fundamentals. It is even claimed that Sarkozy has dropped a key demand that the European Central Bank help to bolster the EFSF’s financial firepower from the current €440bn to closer to the €2tn sought by the US, the UK and market players, turning the fund into a bank. Berlin is pushing for two options: either making the EFSF an insurer which would offer first-loss guarantees to private creditors who buy new issues of government debt from countries under pressure such as Spain and Italy; or combining the bailout fund with last-resort IMF loans. Confidential background reports obtained by the Guardian suggest that these loans, valid for a year but renewable twice for six months, could be as much as 2%-10% of the affected country’s GDP. Sources in Berlin said these two options – among a dozen being studied – are “the most promising.” Profound disagreements, meanwhile, resurfaced over the write-downs banks and insurers would have to suffer on Greek debt to make the latter sustainable. Last July these were set at 21% for private creditors and were entirely voluntary but they could now become compulsory and be set at anywhere between 30% and 50%. The outcome of the next few days could hinge on talks on Saturday between Merkel and Sarkozy, though the French president may still be smarting from an entirely fruitless flight he made to Frankfurt this week for emergency talks with the German chancellor. European debt crisis Euro European Union Economics Euro Europe China United States European banks guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …