Science has confirmed it: Weight Watchers is no fad diet. A new study—the first randomized controlled trial to compare a commercial program like Weight Watchers with weight loss care from a doctor—found that overweight patients who go on Weight Watchers lose about twice as much weight as those…
Continue reading …Deposed Libyan leader vowed ‘never to leave the land of his ancestors’, denying claims he had already fled to Niger If you are a recently deposed Arab dictator, on the run but still trying to galvanise armed resistance to your enemies, then Misha’an al-Jabouri is the man to call. Jabouri, an Iraqi exile who runs al-Rai satellite TV in Syria, had Muammar Gaddafi on the line at 4am on Thursday, rallying his supporters, attacking his opponents as “rats and scumbags “, vowing “never to leave the land of his ancestors”, and denying claims he had already fled Libya for neighbouring Niger. The former MP was self-effacing about his scoop and unembarrassed about throwing a media lifeline to the world’s most wanted man. It was the fourth time he has spoken to Gaddafi – sounding “strong and confident” – since Tripoli fell to the Nato-backed rebels last month. Jabouri was taking a break after finishing his late-night show when the colonel rang. “I am sure he was calling from Libya though I can’t say exactly where he is,” Jabouri told the Guardian by phone from Damascus. Saif al-Islam and Mutasim, another of Gaddafi sons, were also still in Libya, but not with their father, he said. “Gaddafi does not like making recordings and we were worried that Nato might be able to trace his location,” he added. Jabouri says the station’s role was to support the fight against all foreign occupations – in Iraq, Palestine or Libya. “Our channel has relations with all the leaders of resistance in the Middle East,” he said. “I was against Saddam Hussein but when Iraq was occupied I fought the occupation. Now it is the same with Gaddafi.” Gaddafi’s messages have been aired on another channel called al-Muqawamah [The Resistance], possibly using an outside broadcast van whose Libyan operators, Jabouri confirmed, were trained by al-Rai staff. “I do not know if the transmission is carried out from a house, a tent, a desert, or the centre of Tripoli,” he told the Saudi-owned paper al-Sharq al-Awsat, “but I know that it is difficult to detect.” Al-Muqawamah only began broadcasting on 1 September, airing statements by Gaddafi and Saif-al Islam. Otherwise it just shows loops of archive footage of attacks against coalition troops in Iraq. BBC Monitoring believes al-Muqawamah may in fact have been based in Syria. Nilesat, the Egyptian satellite TV provider, has denied transmitting either station after coming under pressure from Nato governments to stop carrying Libyan state channels such as al-Jamahiriyah TV. A third pro-regime channel called al-Uruba [Arabism] – also the name of a Tripoli football team – has broadcast several Gaddafi messages. It went off air in late August, though Jabouri said at the time that it would shortly resume service from Cyprus or Venezuela. Jabouri said al-Rai had been able to build on the expertise he had acquired running the now-defunct al-Zawra channel, which Iraq’s Sunni resistance used to broadcast satellite statements and programmes, and had escaped US jamming. Arab sources say Gaddafi invested heavily in recent years in radio and TV infrastructure, including mobile outside broadcast units, long before the February uprising in Benghazi, probably based in Sirte, still a stronghold of the old regime. “Gaddafi has always been obsessed by the media,” said an Arab observer who knows Libya well. “In the Arab world coups often began at the TV station.” Arabic media have quoted “informed sources” as saying that Gaddafi bought al-Rai for $25m and arranged for an associate, Ahmed al-Shater, to become chairman of its board. Jabouri dismissed this as “propaganda”, but admitted Libya had paid him smaller sums, totalling less than $1m. “Gaddafi is not generous,” he said, “but we would have supported him anyway. We are proud of our record.” In 2008 Jabouri and his Syrian wife were hit by US sanctions prohibiting Americans from doing business with them and freezing their US assets. The move followed accusations that al-Zawra was showing footage of attacks on US soldiers in Iraq. Jabouri clearly feels secure in Syria, where the Assad regime has far bigger problems than al-Rai. It seems unlikely to heed US and British complaints about helping Gaddafi keep in touch with supporters in his hour of greatest need. Muammar Gaddafi Libya Syria Niger Arab and Middle East unrest Middle East Africa Television industry Ian Black guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …David Vitter isn’t going to attend President Obama’s speech tonight, not because he’s sending a message to the president, but because he’s got better things to do. “I have a Saints party,” the Louisiana senator told Fox News yesterday, “and I am absolutely going to be there for the big…
Continue reading …Nasa says chances of its dead 20-year-old satellite, due to fall to Earth later this month, hitting anyone are 3,200-1 Nasa says one of its dead satellites will soon fall to Earth but there is very little chance that it will hit anyone. The space agency does not know when or where its 20-year-old satellite will drop. It will probably be in late September but could fall in October. And it could land anywhere south of Juneau, Alaska, and north of the tip of South America. Nasa says there is only a one in 3,200 chance of satellite parts hitting someone. Experts say not to worry. In the more than 50 years of the space age, no one has ever been hurt by falling space debris. The 5.4-tonne satellite was used to monitor the atmosphere. Most of it will burn up during re-entry. Only about 550kg of metal should survive. Nasa Space United States guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Nasa says chances of its dead 20-year-old satellite, due to fall to Earth later this month, hitting anyone are 3,200-1 Nasa says one of its dead satellites will soon fall to Earth but there is very little chance that it will hit anyone. The space agency does not know when or where its 20-year-old satellite will drop. It will probably be in late September but could fall in October. And it could land anywhere south of Juneau, Alaska, and north of the tip of South America. Nasa says there is only a one in 3,200 chance of satellite parts hitting someone. Experts say not to worry. In the more than 50 years of the space age, no one has ever been hurt by falling space debris. The 5.4-tonne satellite was used to monitor the atmosphere. Most of it will burn up during re-entry. Only about 550kg of metal should survive. Nasa Space United States guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Irene, Katia, and Lee all made not-so-nice headlines, and unfortunately there’s more where they came from: Tropical Storms Nate and Maria are currently taking shape in the Caribbean and Atlantic. Nate, formed in the southern Gulf of Mexico, is expected to drop anywhere from 2 to 8 inches of rain…
Continue reading …One for the Legendary Fail Department: A person dressed in a Gumby costume attempted to rob a San Diego 7-Eleven on Monday. Here are the problems the would-be criminal ran into: One, the clerk thought it was a joke. Even after Gumby said, “This is a robbery,” the employee replied…
Continue reading …Growth in care orders attributed to greater alertness by social workers and lower risk threshold after high-profile Haringey case Record numbers of “at risk” children are being taken from their families and placed into care, official figures show , as social workers respond to what they regard as increasing neglect and emotional abuse of vulnerable youngsters. The rapid growth in care orders is attributed partly to social workers being more prepared to intervene to protect young children from persistent exposure to domestic violence, and parental mental illness and drug and alcohol abuse. Experts also believe the “Baby Peter effect”, following the death of Peter Connolly in Haringey, has persuaded many local authorities to lower the risk threshold to remove a child, in the hope that this will reduce the chances of a high profile child death. The latest figures, published by Cafcass, the children’s court advisory service reveal a rapid and unexpected acceleration in court applications in recent months, following a steady rise over the last three years. There were 894 care applications in March alone, the highest monthly total since records began in 2001. Between April and August more than 4,000 care applications were made in England – nearly 9% up on the same period last year. Local authorities fear the rapid increase in children being taken into care is becoming financially unsustainable. Some councils have gone over budget on child protection this year as they are being forced to massive cuts. In 2008-09 there were 6,488 care applications. Last year there were 9,184, which on current projections will be comfortably exceeded by the end of March. Almost all result in the child being taken into care. Cafcass chief executive Anthony Douglas said local authorities were right in taking more children at risk of significant harm into care. “This data represents children’s lives, and the rise in numbers shows a greater awareness of the life-threatening situations some children live in, day-by-day, with no light on their horizon.” He said that the case of 17-month old Peter Connelly , who was on Haringey council’s child protection register when he was killed by his mother and two of her male friends in 2007, still loomed large. Subsequent inquiries found that safeguarding officials believed Peter’s situation did not meet the threshold for taking him into care, believing he was safe with his mother. “Since then, many local authorities have lowered the threshold they use for making a court application to remove a child, and kept that threshold lower.” Matt Dunkley, president of the Association of Directors of Children’s Services said the increases reflected a greater understanding by social workers of the dangers of leaving children in chaotic family environments where they were at risk of neglect or of witnessing domestic violence, and that, anecdotally, these risks had increased. “Social workers would say that the economy is placing more pressure on families who are least able to cope. They would say that the sheer number of parents abusing drugs and alcohol has increased.” He added that the figures would be even higher but for the fact that the family courts were “clogged up, ” limiting the numbers of applications. Cases can typically take between 12 and 18 months to go through the courts, although ministers hope that a review of the family justice system will lead to the process being limited to 30 weeks. Councils are looking to shift their focus towards “early intervention” policies such as parenting support projects in the hope that this will reduce the number of children at risk of being taken into care. But government cuts, including a 20% reduction in the early intervention grant funding, has made this shift more difficult. A Department for Education spokesman said: “We are aware that care applications remain at very high levels, but there is no evidence that children are being taken into care unnecessarily. It’s vital when decisions are made to take a child into care that the family justice system can respond quickly and effectively. We know that there are unacceptable delays in the system at the present time. The Family Justice Review , which is due to report later in the year, is taking a radical look at how these processes could be improved.” Baby P Child protection Social care Young people Local government Patrick Butler guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Rule dating back to emergence of HIV and Aids no longer deemed necessary but one-year deferral still applies Gay men will soon be able to give blood after a ban on them donating, dating back to the emergence of HIV and Aids in the mid-1980s, was scrapped by ministers. The ban, which permanently prevented gay men from being donors, was lifted after a team of experts said it was no longer required to stop the spread of infection through blood. The change – agreed by health ministers in England, Scotland and Wales – means gay men who have not had sex with another man for at least a year can donate from 7 November, as long as they have not taken part in other behaviour that might constitute a risk to patients receiving blood. However, those who have had anal or oral sex with another man in the preceding 12 months, with or without a condom, will remain ineligible to join the 2 million people who already donate blood. They have been put into the same category of risk as other groups such as sex workers, anyone who has had sex with a sex worker or intravenous drug-user in the past year, and women who have slept with a man who has had sex with another male. The decision follows a review by the Advisory Committee on the Safety of Blood, Tissues and Organs (Sabto), which concluded that the latest evidence suggested the ban was no longer justified. The controversial rule had long been criticised as outdated and discriminatory. Organisations representing gay men and working with those with HIV or Aids welcomed the decision. “The removal of the ban to a one-year deferral is great news but it’s going to leave some gay men frustrated that they still can’t donate blood,” said Carl Burnell, chief executive of the gay men’s health group GMFA. Anne Milton, the public health minister, said it was important that everyone complied with the donor selection criteria. The Terence Higgins Trust also welcomed the change. “Thirty years on from the devastating, tragic and fatal arrival of HIV and AIDS there has been a growing sense that the lifetime ban was no longer ‘right’,” said Sir Nick Partridge, the chief executive. “Set against the hundreds of other deferral criteria, this was the one that drew the eye and seemed unfair and unreasonable.” The new regulations “will ensure the safety of the blood supply for all of us while also being fair and equal in their application”, he added. But veteran gay rights campaigner Peter Tatchell said gay men who always used condoms should not be barred from donating. “Although the new policy is a big improvement on the existing discriminatory rules, a 12-month ban is still excessive and unjustified,” he said. Sabto member Professor Deirdre Kelly said the recommendation took account of new data that had emerged since the body’s last review in 2006, as well as scientific and technological advances. Gay rights Health Equality Denis Campbell guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …He managed to escape the six months in jail he was facing, but John Galliano didn’t manage to escape a guilty verdict. A Paris court today convicted the former Christian Dior designer for making “public insults based on origin, religious affiliation, race, or ethnicity.” He was given a suspended sentence…
Continue reading …