Home » Archives by category » News » World News (Page 395)

Amazon made a surprising move last night: It gave in and agreed to charge sales tax in California next year. The online retailer announced it had reached a deal with the state in which it would stop fighting a new law that would force it to collect sales tax in…

Continue reading …

The Pledge of Allegiance has no educational value, an activist group insists, and thus has no place being recited in schools. As such, Brookline PAX is pushing a resolution that would ban the pledge in Brookline schools, the Boston Globe reports. Technically, reciting the pledge is voluntary, but the group’s…

Continue reading …

This year, all first-year students at Linn State Technical College will be required to undergo mandatory drug testing. The policy enacted by the two-year school in Missouri may be the most intense drug-testing policy at any public college or university in the US, the AP reports. Civil libertarians are peeved…

Continue reading …

MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough is taking a unique approach to the 9/11 anniversary: He’s released his own music video called Reason to Believe , writes Dan Needham of the Huffington Post , who writes a glowing review. (Not everyone is so kind; see Gawker .) “It’s critical that we remember the heroes of…

Continue reading …
FBI investigates terror ‘threat’ to New York or Washington

Three people have entered US intending to launch attack on New York or Washington on anniversary of 9/11, according to reports US officials have received “credible but unconfirmed” intelligence that a terrorist attack is being planned for New York or Washington on the anniversary of 9/11. Associated Press reported a counter-terrorism official as saying the intelligence had been under investigation since it was received late on Wednesday night. ABC news said intelligence agencies received information that three people had entered the US with the intention of launching a “vehicle-borne” attack on the anniversary of September 11. The mayor of New York, Michael Bloomberg, announced a press conference for 9.30pm ET (2.30am BST) with the city’s police commissioner, Ray Kelly, and a senior FBI official. In a report on its website, ABC said officials believed the suspected attackers began their journey in Afghanistan, and may have passed through Iran. AP said officials would not say specifically what is being targeted in New York or Washington, nor the timing of a potential attack. A government official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the terror alert had not been raised because of the threat. AP said that, according to its source, the threat came in a single piece of information. A White House official said President Barack Obama was briefed on Thursday morning. Matt Chandler, a spokesman for the homeland security department, said in a statement: “As we know from the intelligence gathered from the Osama bin Laden raid, al-Qaida has shown an interest in important dates and anniversaries, such as 9/11. In this instance, it’s accurate that there is specific, credible but unconfirmed threat information. “As we always do before important dates like the anniversary of 9/11, we will undoubtedly get more reporting in the coming days. “Sometimes this reporting is credible and warrants intense focus, other times it lacks credibility and is highly unlikely to be reflective of real plots under way. Regardless, we take all threat reporting seriously, and we have taken, and will continue to take all steps necessary to mitigate any threats that arise. ‘We continue to ask the American people to remain vigilant as we head into the weekend.” The homeland security secretary, Janet Napolitano, told reporters last Thursday there was “a lot of chatter” around the anniversary of the attacks but there was no information about a specific threat. Security measures around the US, including in New York and Washington, have been enhanced in the weeks leading to the anniversary on Sunday. Global terrorism United States New York Washington DC CIA September 11 2001 guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Barack Obama unveils $447bn jobs plan

President uses televised address to urge Republicans to end ‘political circus’ and approve American Jobs Act to bring down unemployment Barack Obama used a televised address to the nation to unveil a $447bn package aimed at bringing down the country’s high jobless total, the issue that could determine whether he wins re-election next year. In a rare joint session of Congress on Thursday night, the president challenged the Republicans to end the “political circus” in Washington by approving legislation he is to send them next week, the American Jobs Act. But the Republicans, even before Obama spoke, signalled opposition to a package they dispute will produce significant numbers of new jobs and dismissed it as an election gimmick. Washington could be facing its third major Congress-White House standoff this year. All the pomp and ceremony attached to such events could not disguise the extent of the polarisation in Washington. Many Republican members of Congress boycotted Obama’s speech, a rare snub for a sitting president. Those members defied the Republican House Speaker, John Boehner, who earlier in the day, even though he is himself one of Obama’s fiercest opponents, urged them to show respect for the office by attending. Democrats stood frequently to applaud what was a strongly partisan speech while, for the most part, Republicans sat in grim silence. The American Jobs Act includes $140bn for building roads, bridges and other major infrastructure projects that would put hundreds of thousands into work; $70bn in tax breaks for small businesses; tax credits for companies taking on military veterans; tax and training for the long-term jobless, and aid to states so that they do not have to lay off 280,000 teachers, as well as other workers. Infrastructure projects include repairing and modernising 35,000 schools. The biggest expenditure, $175bn, is to put more money into the pockets of workers and their families through a 50% cut in payroll tax. Obama said he will announce later what cuts will need to be made to pay for this. He hinted this would include tax cuts for millionaires, moves that Republicans will reject outright. The president said Congress had to choose between millionaires and teachers: he knew what Americans wanted. “This isn’t political grandstanding. This isn’t class warfare. This is simple math,” he said. Republicans, committed to deep cuts in federal spending, are almost certain to vote down proposals that will cost $447bn. In his speech, Obama called on them to work for a compromise rather than paralyse Washington as they did over debt before the summer. “The question is whether, in the face of an ongoing national crisis, we can stop the political circus and actually do something to help the economy,” he said. He added: “Ultimately, our recovery will be driven not by Washington, but by our businesses and our workers. But we can help. We can make a difference. There are steps we can take right now to improve people’s lives.” Obama’s approval ratings, according to a Gallup poll this week, stand at a career low of only 42%, mainly because of his handling of the economy, and if he cannot reverse the unemployment figures he faces a tough re-election battle. If Republicans in Congress block his plans, Obama has a Plan B, proposing to go out on the campaign trail blaming them for obstructionism. Fourteen million people in the US are officially unemployed, though the real figure is estimated at being possibly double that. Republicans say Obama’s last stimulus package in 2009, which cost $789bn, failed to create new jobs. Unemployment under Obama has risen from 7.8% at the start of his presidency to 9.1%. Obama counters that without his stimulus package unemployment would be even higher. He told Congress that the purpose of the American Jobs Act was to put more people in work and more money in the pockets of those who are working. “It will create more jobs for construction workers, more jobs for teachers, more jobs for veterans, and more jobs for the long-term unemployed, ” Obama said. “It will provide a tax break for companies who hire new workers, and it will cut payroll taxes in half for every working American and every small business. It will provide a jolt to an economy that has stalled, and give companies confidence that if they invest and hire, there will be customers for their products and services. You should pass this jobs plan right away.” Republican members of Congress said on Thursday morning that, based on leaks to the media, there was nothing new in the speech, which would be just a rehash of proposals Obama has put forward since his days on the campaign trail in 2008. The Republican leader in the Senate, Mitch McConnell, dismissed Obama’s jobs plans as retreads. “What is surprising is the president’s apparent determination to apply the same government-driven policies that have already been tried and failed,” he said in a speech to the Senate. He added: “This isn’t a jobs plan. It’s a re-election plan.” House Republicans, reluctant to be cast as the villains, were in public unwilling to dismiss Obama’s plans out of hand and said they were willing to consider the proposals. Boehner, in a statement issued after Obama completed his speech, sounded conciliatory, recognising the anger among voters over party bickering. “The proposals the president outlined tonight merit consideration. We hope he gives serious consideration to our ideas as well,” he said. “It’s my hope that we can work together to end the uncertainty facing families and small businesses, and create a better environment for long-term economic growth and private-sector job creation.” But behind the scenes, House Republicans, who voted against Obama’s first stimulus package, see little reason to vote for a second. Barack Obama US economy United States Obama administration US Congress US politics Republicans Ewen MacAskill guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

Carol Bartz is not beating around the bushes when it comes to her dismissal from Yahoo . “These people fucked me over,” she told Fortune Tuesday, in her first interview since the ouster. Bartz says that when she made a scheduled call to Chairman Roy Bostock, he began reading her a…

Continue reading …

The horror and confusion of Sept. 11, 2001, comes to gut-wrenching life in newly published audio offering a real-time picture of the civil and military aviation responses during the first two hours after the hijackings. The 114 recordings, published by Rutgers Law Review and available in part on the New…

Continue reading …

Moneyball – review

No Comment
Moneyball – review

The film battling to be this year’s Social Network is more melodramatic than one might expect from Aaron Sorkin So here’s the film batting to be this year’s The Social Network. It’s got the whole package: a plot that revolves round a revolutionary bit of computer kit, loads of scenes in which men argue in boardrooms, and a script spritzed with zingers by Aaron Sorkin. But the software in Moneyball – sabermetrics, or the use of data analysis to place a fiscal value on baseball attributes – is a tougher sell than the insta-sexy Facebook, and its potential impact on the world feels a lot less teutonic. Those who enter the cinema unstirred by either the sport or by the joys of stats are unlikely to come out converts. Brad Pitt plays Billy Beane, a star player gone to seed and now managing an ailing team in Oakland. He doesn’t have cash to blow on pricey players so needs to get creative. Enter an economics whiz (Jonah Hill), who briefs him on the hidden bargains to be snapped up for a song – think Bargain Hunt meets Wisden. Such unorthodox tactics incur the anger of Billy’s traditionalist colleagues, most notably Philip Seymour Hoffman’s head coach – a performance of mostly unleavened grumpiness, this, just as Robin Wright (as Billy’s estranged wife) is simply supportive, and Kerris Dorsey as his 12-year-old daughter purely precocious. Pitt, meanwhile, comes across as a bit of a knackered lunk, too vanilla for his struggles to grip in the same way as, say, those of Michael Sheen’s Brian Clough in The Damned United – a film with a similar real-life sporting triumph template. The exception is Hill, who delivers a surprisingly affecting performance, shy but not simpering, with a refreshing lack of character arc. It’s the sort of turn too rare on screen: unshowy and naturalistic. Overall though, Moneyball is more melodramatic than one might expect from the pen of Sorkin (who massaged an earlier draft by Steven Zaillian), gooier in the middle and coshing the audience with its emotional wallops. While The Social Network scaled up the computer programme at its centre to say wider things about humanity (that electronic connectivity may not ultimately alleviate loneliness), Moneyball fails to deliver any thesis on whether or not people can be condensed to data. It’s a topic you’d imagine might have tickled the scriptwriter – but compared to Sorkin’s earlier efforts, this has all the subtle touch of a baseball mitt. Rating: 2/5 Toronto film festival 2011 Drama Brad Pitt Aaron Sorkin Philip Seymour Hoffman US sport Toronto film festival Festivals Catherine Shoard guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

Violent crime is on the rise in Puerto Rico—and the police department is part of the problem, a scathing new report from the Justice Department concludes. The department is “broken in a number of critical and fundamental respects,” according to a copy of the report obtained by the New…

Continue reading …