Home » Archives by category » News » World News (Page 362)
Former MI5 chief urges terrorist talks

Lady Eliza Manningham-Buller says dialogue with terror groups, including al-Qaida, requires courage but ‘is necessary’ The former head of MI5, Lady Eliza Manningham-Buller, has delivered an impassioned defence of talking to terrorists, even to elements of al-Qaida. “Dialogue, even with terrorists, is necessary”, she told an invited audience at the recording of her third and final BBC Reith lecture, on the theme Securing Freedom, in the British Library in central London. “Talking doesn’t mean approval”, she said. “It’s a way of exploring peaceful options, what compromises, if any, can be reached”. She added it required courage by governments. She continued: “Not all terrorist are evil, though their acts are”. There were people in al-Qaida who were tired of terror and already prepared to help the west. She said she was not suggesting “rushing off to do it tomorrow” but to consider which “components” of al-Qaida western interests could speak to. She has already provoked some of her former political masters in Tony Blair’s government by attacking the invasion of Iraq and decrying the term “war on terror”, in her earlier Reith lectures. On Monday, she went further, saying it was important “to try and reduce terrorism by talking to its advocates”. It was important, she said, to keep a “rational perspective” about the risks of terrorism. Politicians “lose their way” if they become too apprehensive about how the media would respond to terrorist attacks, she said. Attacking the many anti-terrorist laws passed by the Labour government, she spoke of “unnecessary” and “unproductive” measures. “The rush to legislation after an atrocity is often a mistake.” British governments, she said, had talked to the Provisional IRA in Northern Ireland. She said she would not exclude talking now to dissident Republican groups there. Asked after her lecture whether the west should talk to Hamas, the militant group governing Gaza, she replied: “I believe talks are going on. I’m not going to say more than that”. She described the use of intelligence agencies in “deniable” operations as “quite useful”. MI6 carried out back-channel talks with the IRA under the Thatcher government though it is unclear exactly what ministers knew about them. It is also unclear what ministers knew about MI6 involvement in “rendering” Libyan dissidents and terror suspects to Muammar Gaddafi’s security forces in 2003. There is a question, Manningham-Buller, who was head of MI5 at the time, said “whether the UK supped with a sufficiently long spoon”. She made it clear in an earlier Reith lecture that, in her view, the activities of MI6 were wrong. She is expected to give evidence to the Gibson inquiry into allegations of British collusion in the torture and the abuse of detainees. Her lecture, the third on the theme, Securing Freedom, will be broadcast on BBC Radio 4 on 20 September. UK security and terrorism Global terrorism Terrorism policy al-Qaida MI5 MI6 IRA Hamas Palestinian territories Labour Libya Middle East Africa Richard Norton-Taylor guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Former MI5 chief urges terrorist talks

Lady Eliza Manningham-Buller says dialogue with terror groups, including al-Qaida, requires courage but ‘is necessary’ The former head of MI5, Lady Eliza Manningham-Buller, has delivered an impassioned defence of talking to terrorists, even to elements of al-Qaida. “Dialogue, even with terrorists, is necessary”, she told an invited audience at the recording of her third and final BBC Reith lecture, on the theme Securing Freedom, in the British Library in central London. “Talking doesn’t mean approval”, she said. “It’s a way of exploring peaceful options, what compromises, if any, can be reached”. She added it required courage by governments. She continued: “Not all terrorist are evil, though their acts are”. There were people in al-Qaida who were tired of terror and already prepared to help the west. She said she was not suggesting “rushing off to do it tomorrow” but to consider which “components” of al-Qaida western interests could speak to. She has already provoked some of her former political masters in Tony Blair’s government by attacking the invasion of Iraq and decrying the term “war on terror”, in her earlier Reith lectures. On Monday, she went further, saying it was important “to try and reduce terrorism by talking to its advocates”. It was important, she said, to keep a “rational perspective” about the risks of terrorism. Politicians “lose their way” if they become too apprehensive about how the media would respond to terrorist attacks, she said. Attacking the many anti-terrorist laws passed by the Labour government, she spoke of “unnecessary” and “unproductive” measures. “The rush to legislation after an atrocity is often a mistake.” British governments, she said, had talked to the Provisional IRA in Northern Ireland. She said she would not exclude talking now to dissident Republican groups there. Asked after her lecture whether the west should talk to Hamas, the militant group governing Gaza, she replied: “I believe talks are going on. I’m not going to say more than that”. She described the use of intelligence agencies in “deniable” operations as “quite useful”. MI6 carried out back-channel talks with the IRA under the Thatcher government though it is unclear exactly what ministers knew about them. It is also unclear what ministers knew about MI6 involvement in “rendering” Libyan dissidents and terror suspects to Muammar Gaddafi’s security forces in 2003. There is a question, Manningham-Buller, who was head of MI5 at the time, said “whether the UK supped with a sufficiently long spoon”. She made it clear in an earlier Reith lecture that, in her view, the activities of MI6 were wrong. She is expected to give evidence to the Gibson inquiry into allegations of British collusion in the torture and the abuse of detainees. Her lecture, the third on the theme, Securing Freedom, will be broadcast on BBC Radio 4 on 20 September. UK security and terrorism Global terrorism Terrorism policy al-Qaida MI5 MI6 IRA Hamas Palestinian territories Labour Libya Middle East Africa Richard Norton-Taylor guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Lib Dems’ fugitive donor named his dog Charles (Kennedy) as a bitter joke

Convicted fraudster Michael Brown traced to Caribbean while his multiple identities raise questions for UK officials Waiters in the hotels along Punta Cana beach, a curve of white sand on the easternmost tip of the Dominican Republic, say the Scottish man in bermuda shorts is known as the owner of Charlie, a rottweiler-alsatian cross which is usually by his side. The pair have been seen in the Caribbean surf where Charlie liked to gnaw at discarded coconut shells. Last month, they were spotted in a gold Porsche Cayenne 4×4 as it bounced along the potholed roads to an exclusive golf course. But the dog’s owner, the Liberal Democrats’ fugitive donor Michael Brown, could not let the opportunity pass for a bitter joke at the expense of the party he once bankrolled. A former business associate claims Brown’s pet is named after Charles Kennedy, the ex-leader of the Liberal Democrats who accepted his gift. “He told me that he had given money to a political party and that his puppy was named after the leader. He thought it was funny,” said the one-time friend. Today the Guardian can reveal that fraudulently acquired legal documents enabled Brown to escape justice and begin a new life in the Caribbean. Brown, who gave the Lib Dems £2.4m of stolen money before being convicted of theft in his absence, duped the British authorities into giving him a passport under the name of Darren Patrick Nally in June 2008. At the time he was on bail in connection with a £60m fraud. The passport allowed him to leave Britain for a new, anonymous life in the Dominican Republic. Flitting between at least three properties nestled on white sand beaches and manicured golf courses, he applied for temporary residency and even enrolled on the country’s electoral register. Disclosure of the false passport raises serious questions for the Identity and Passport Service. At the time, images of Brown had featured in dozens of news articles and television programmes because of his sizeable gift to a political party. He already had a conviction from 2006 for obtaining a passport by deception. His fake passport enabled him to acquire the false Dominican documents. It is understood that police are investigating claims that he has acquired other British passports under stolen identities. The documents also show how Brown has changed his appearance while at the top of the City of London police’s most wanted list and on Crimestoppers’ most wanted list. While on the run, Brown was convicted and sentenced to seven years’ imprisonment for the theft of £8m, although the court was told he had stolen around £60m. Despite a court ruling that found that Brown’s donor firm 5th Avenue Partners was wholly fraudulent, Nick Clegg has refused to return the money that came from it. The Lib Dems have claimed that it was accepted in good faith. In his passport photograph, applied for in June 2008, Brown has grown a beard and his temples have gone grey. He had previously been clean-shaven and used to dye his hair strawberry blond. He may have been attempting to look a little older. Brown was then aged 42, while the real owner of his new identity was 47. Brown persuaded a judge that he was not a flight risk and should no longer have to wear an electronic tag. Living under strict bail conditions in Hampstead, north London, he had been forced to hand over his real passport and was expected to check in with police twice a week. In fact Brown had gone to great lengths to acquire a number of documents bearing false names while awaiting trial. He used the name Michael Brown when his local council registered him in August 2007, but in September he returned a document to Camden electoral services stating that his surname should be registered as Campbell-Brown. He used this name to set up bank accounts with Capital One and NatWest at a time when his assets were frozen by a court order. The Dominican documents show that by February 2010, he was sporting a deeper tan. Government officials said Brown’s false British passport would have been one of two documents he used to apply for permission to live in the country. His temporary residency card appears to show that Brown’s adopted identity of Nally is Irish. Brown was in fact born in Scotland and is a UK citizen. Brown’s electoral identity card was registered at Sea Horse Ranch, an exclusive resort in the north of the country where he lived in an £882,000 villa protected by armed security guards. He is said to have lived there for several months at least. Two men suspected of helping him flee Britain and adopt a false identity were arrested and questioned on Friday. The former friend, who says he lost hundred of thousands of dollars in a venture with Brown under his assumed name of Nally, said Brown was angered about the lack of support he had been given by politicians. “Darren gave them money, and they did not look after him,” he said. Marta Palomo, an estate agent who rents a four-bedroom house to Brown in a guarded estate a few hundred metres from the sea, said that she saw him two weeks ago. “I saw him in the house, and have spoken to him in the last week. He is busy, spends a lot of time in the capital city. He has had a place here for years,” she said. “He lives with his dog and a maid comes by and sometimes his wife comes over to visit,” she said. Brown’s wife Sharon Campbell lives in Mallorca. Brown told Palomo last week that he would be going away for a short time because a friend has been in hospital, she said. “I think he is out at the moment because his friend is ill, he has gone to see him in hospital. But I am sure he will be back,” she said. Manuel Angella, a local taxi driver who has driven Brown to the capital city of Santo Domingo, said: “Darren is a very good man. There are many worse people in this world,” he said. City of London police are negotiating to secure Brown’s return. No Briton has ever been forced to return from the Dominican Republic and there is no extradition treaty between the two countries. Liberal Democrats Dominican Republic Party funding Crime Rajeev Syal guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Lib Dems’ fugitive donor named his dog Charles (Kennedy) as a bitter joke

Convicted fraudster Michael Brown traced to Caribbean while his multiple identities raise questions for UK officials Waiters in the hotels along Punta Cana beach, a curve of white sand on the easternmost tip of the Dominican Republic, say the Scottish man in bermuda shorts is known as the owner of Charlie, a rottweiler-alsatian cross which is usually by his side. The pair have been seen in the Caribbean surf where Charlie liked to gnaw at discarded coconut shells. Last month, they were spotted in a gold Porsche Cayenne 4×4 as it bounced along the potholed roads to an exclusive golf course. But the dog’s owner, the Liberal Democrats’ fugitive donor Michael Brown, could not let the opportunity pass for a bitter joke at the expense of the party he once bankrolled. A former business associate claims Brown’s pet is named after Charles Kennedy, the ex-leader of the Liberal Democrats who accepted his gift. “He told me that he had given money to a political party and that his puppy was named after the leader. He thought it was funny,” said the one-time friend. Today the Guardian can reveal that fraudulently acquired legal documents enabled Brown to escape justice and begin a new life in the Caribbean. Brown, who gave the Lib Dems £2.4m of stolen money before being convicted of theft in his absence, duped the British authorities into giving him a passport under the name of Darren Patrick Nally in June 2008. At the time he was on bail in connection with a £60m fraud. The passport allowed him to leave Britain for a new, anonymous life in the Dominican Republic. Flitting between at least three properties nestled on white sand beaches and manicured golf courses, he applied for temporary residency and even enrolled on the country’s electoral register. Disclosure of the false passport raises serious questions for the Identity and Passport Service. At the time, images of Brown had featured in dozens of news articles and television programmes because of his sizeable gift to a political party. He already had a conviction from 2006 for obtaining a passport by deception. His fake passport enabled him to acquire the false Dominican documents. It is understood that police are investigating claims that he has acquired other British passports under stolen identities. The documents also show how Brown has changed his appearance while at the top of the City of London police’s most wanted list and on Crimestoppers’ most wanted list. While on the run, Brown was convicted and sentenced to seven years’ imprisonment for the theft of £8m, although the court was told he had stolen around £60m. Despite a court ruling that found that Brown’s donor firm 5th Avenue Partners was wholly fraudulent, Nick Clegg has refused to return the money that came from it. The Lib Dems have claimed that it was accepted in good faith. In his passport photograph, applied for in June 2008, Brown has grown a beard and his temples have gone grey. He had previously been clean-shaven and used to dye his hair strawberry blond. He may have been attempting to look a little older. Brown was then aged 42, while the real owner of his new identity was 47. Brown persuaded a judge that he was not a flight risk and should no longer have to wear an electronic tag. Living under strict bail conditions in Hampstead, north London, he had been forced to hand over his real passport and was expected to check in with police twice a week. In fact Brown had gone to great lengths to acquire a number of documents bearing false names while awaiting trial. He used the name Michael Brown when his local council registered him in August 2007, but in September he returned a document to Camden electoral services stating that his surname should be registered as Campbell-Brown. He used this name to set up bank accounts with Capital One and NatWest at a time when his assets were frozen by a court order. The Dominican documents show that by February 2010, he was sporting a deeper tan. Government officials said Brown’s false British passport would have been one of two documents he used to apply for permission to live in the country. His temporary residency card appears to show that Brown’s adopted identity of Nally is Irish. Brown was in fact born in Scotland and is a UK citizen. Brown’s electoral identity card was registered at Sea Horse Ranch, an exclusive resort in the north of the country where he lived in an £882,000 villa protected by armed security guards. He is said to have lived there for several months at least. Two men suspected of helping him flee Britain and adopt a false identity were arrested and questioned on Friday. The former friend, who says he lost hundred of thousands of dollars in a venture with Brown under his assumed name of Nally, said Brown was angered about the lack of support he had been given by politicians. “Darren gave them money, and they did not look after him,” he said. Marta Palomo, an estate agent who rents a four-bedroom house to Brown in a guarded estate a few hundred metres from the sea, said that she saw him two weeks ago. “I saw him in the house, and have spoken to him in the last week. He is busy, spends a lot of time in the capital city. He has had a place here for years,” she said. “He lives with his dog and a maid comes by and sometimes his wife comes over to visit,” she said. Brown’s wife Sharon Campbell lives in Mallorca. Brown told Palomo last week that he would be going away for a short time because a friend has been in hospital, she said. “I think he is out at the moment because his friend is ill, he has gone to see him in hospital. But I am sure he will be back,” she said. Manuel Angella, a local taxi driver who has driven Brown to the capital city of Santo Domingo, said: “Darren is a very good man. There are many worse people in this world,” he said. City of London police are negotiating to secure Brown’s return. No Briton has ever been forced to return from the Dominican Republic and there is no extradition treaty between the two countries. Liberal Democrats Dominican Republic Party funding Crime Rajeev Syal guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

Glenn Beck’s legion of devotees will finally get to see their favorite pundit’s face again tonight, when Beck launches his new online-only show. Titled simply Glenn Beck, the program will resemble his old Fox show—complete with chalkboards—but it’ll be a whopping two hours long and include several new…

Continue reading …

Nope, Madonna still doesn’t like hydrangeas, a fact she makes abundantly clear in a new video posted on her official YouTube channel. Though titled “Madonna’s love letter to hydrangeas”—and beginning with an apparent apology to the flower she dissed last week —the video quickly changes course, with an angry…

Continue reading …

In April 2004, the 6-week-old son of Jade Sanders and Lamont Thomas starved to death, and Georgia’s top court today upheld the couple’s murder convictions and life sentences from 2007. A court initially found the first-time parents guilty of murder after investigators discovered they fed the boy mostly soy milk…

Continue reading …
GOP presidential debate in Tampa – live

Frontrunner Rick Perry will be the target at the CNN Tea Party Republican presidential debate in Tampa. Follow it here live. •  Click to jump to the start of the blog 7.05pm ET: Here’s some background about Rick Perry’s career as a politician in Texas. It includes clips from a 1990 ad when he was running for state agricultural commissioner (a big job in Texas and many US states). 7.04pm ET: Romney appears certain to zero in on Perry’s remarks from the last debate about social security. Already today I’ve received emails from the Romney campaign headlined “RICK’S LATEST RETREAT ON SOCIAL SECURITY”. Tampa Bay Online reports : Mitt Romney didn’t wait long to begin his attack on Rick Perry over Social Security — his campaign is doing door-to-door distribution of a flier attacking Perry on the issue. The flier, which a campagn spokesman said is being left at the doors of Florida GOP primary voters, portrays the GOP primary as a two-candidate race — “Two candidates. Only one will protect what’s important to you,” is the headline. Of those two, it says, Perry is “reckless and wrong on Social Security.” The bold-face tagline: “Rick Perry: How can we trust anyone who wants to kill Social Security?” The New York Times has the background : The Republican candidates for president are likely to find themselves in the middle of an intraparty feud over Social Security as they take the stage in Tampa, Fla., on Monday night for another nationally televised debate. Rick Perry, the governor of Texas, has sparked a high-stakes political fight over Social Security by calling the popular retirement program a “failure” and a “Ponzi scheme” on the campaign trail and in his recent book. And his rivals have pounced. Mitt Romney, the former governor of Massachusetts, warned during a debate last week that the Republican Party should nominate someone “who isn’t committed to abolishing Social Security, but who is committed to saving Social Security.” 7.01pm ET: There was a boost for Rick Perry before tonight’s debate: the news that Louisiana governor Bobby Jindal – still a rising star in the modern Republican party, despite being overshadowed recently – has endorsed Perry’s bid for the nomination . That rather trumps Mitt Romney’s big news earlier today that one-time presidential candidate Tim Pawlenty – who pulled out before the race had barely begun – is now backing him . Preamble: Welcome to “Rick Perry versus the World 2″, the sequal to last week’s popular Republican presidential debate , in which GOP candidates queued up to kick Texas governor Rick Perry in the shins – including Perry himself, if you believe some of the coverage. Tonight’s debate-cum-brawl starts at 8pm ET (1am BST), from the Florida state fairgrounds in Tampa – with the novel twist in that the debate is co-hosted by CNN and the Tea Party Express group. CNN is billing it as “the Tea Party Debate,” which is not at all a desperate bid by a cable news channel with sagging ratings to lure in viewers from Fox News. Six days ago it was Perry who grabbed the post-debate headlines with his description of social security as a “Ponzi scheme,” based on earlier strident criticisms Perry had made in his 2010 book, “I’m Not Running For President” (recently reissued as “Rick Perry’s Winning Plan For America”). In Florida, though, the Republican electorate is more elderly, quite fond of social security and willing to vote. As the third largest state in the Union, and a critical swing state in 2012, Florida holds a lot of sway in the Republican contest. You can read my preview of tonight’s debate here . Since then there has been plenty of action, with the Romney campaign putting out leaflets designed to terrify the elderly of Florida by saying that Perry wants to destroy social security (state pensions, in this context). As well, Michele Bachmann – who risks sliding back into obscurity that some say she richly deserves – is also to make on a full-on attack on Perry for his unspecified threats to reform social security. Pery showed last week that he doesn’t run from a fight, and is more than happy to start one. So tonight could be very entertaining indeed. Beyond all of the tactical discussion, the startegic point is that Perry may be running away with this race, barring an implosion on his part. The latest polls show him with solid leads – the latest one by CNN has Perry leading in every single category. Polls this early, especially national polls, are pretty useless. But still, they play into a growing realisation that Perry is the one to beat – assuming he can be beaten. Kick off is 8pm ET, feel free to leave your thoughts and comments below, and I’ll also be adding even more vapid remarks on Twitter at RichardA . Republican presidential nomination 2012 Tea Party movement Rick Perry United States Mitt Romney Michele Bachmann Republicans US elections 2012 CNN Florida US politics Ron Paul Jon Huntsman Newt Gingrich Richard Adams guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Bank of America chief to make $5bn cuts in bid to reverse company’s slide

Brian Moynihan to oversee company overhaul known as Project New BAC, which could lead to the loss of 40,000 US jobs Bank of America’s boss faced his sceptics in New York on Monday morning and promised another $5bn of cuts as he fights to halt the precipitous slide in the fortunes of the US’s largest bank. Brian Moynihan has faced fierce criticism from investors as the financial giant’s share price has collapsed. Moynihan is overseeing a restructuring of the bank that could lead to the loss of 30,000 to 40,000 jobs, and is likely to end Bank of America’s reign as the largest US bank by assets. “We don’t have to be the biggest company out there: we have to be the best,” Moynihan told the audience at the Barclays 2011 Global Financial Services Conference. Bank of America’s shares have halved since the start of the year, dragged down by the faltering economy and a wave of litigation over the bank’s involvement in sub-prime mortgages. The cuts are the first phase of an overhaul known as Project New BAC , and will be finalised by the end of 2013. “We can get out of things we don’t need to do, [to] make the company leaner, more straightforward, more driven,” Moynihan said. Last month Warren Buffett pumped $5bn into Bank of America, a vote of confidence from the world’s most respected investor that initially drove up the bank’s shares. Buffett made a similar investment in Goldman Sachs at the height of the credit crisis that generated a huge payday for shareholders in his Berkshire Hathaway investment fund. Bank of America’s share price rose sharply on the news of Buffett’s bet, but the company has since lost all that gain. Moynihan told the New York conference he was “very pleased” with the investment, which has been criticised by analysts as too favourable for Buffett. Moynihan said the bank faces three key issues. He said it was being held back by slow growth in the US economy, by its disastrous purchase of sub-prime home loan giant Countrywide in 2008, and by regulatory changes that will force banks to keep aside more money for a rainy day. Last quarter, Bank of America reported an $8.8bn loss , owing in large part to a settlement with mortgage investors related to Countrywide. Asked whether he consider filing bankruptcy for Countrywide, Moynihan said the bank “looks at all our options on everything.” Bank of America US economy Banking Banking reform United States Warren Buffett Dominic Rushe guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

A new set of international banking regulations are “anti-American,” the CEO of JPMorgan Chase tells the Financial Times —so much so that the US should seriously consider quitting the regulatory group that set the rules. The Basel group’s new regulations require banks to balance risk-taking by accumulating special capital equal…

Continue reading …