President Obama’s campaign has set up a new take on its old “Fight the Smears” concept… only this time it’s a lot less friendly looking. Gone is the white-and-blue motif, replaced with an ominous red-and-black site called ” Attack Watch “—and conservatives appear to find it hilarious. Seemingly every tweet using…
Continue reading …Texas executes more people than any other state in America, and there are currently more than 300 Texan prisoners on death row. Roll over the images on the interactive to find out more about them Garry Blight
Continue reading …Scandal of $2.6bn bank fraud embroils president’s chief of staff Esfandiar Rahim Mashaei Iran’s president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, has been forced to deny that his protege was involved in a $2.6bn (£1.64bn) bank fraud, described as the country’s biggest ever financial scam. The president’s official website on Thursday issued a statement , saying his chief of staff and close confidant, Esfandiar Rahim Mashaei, was not linked to the scandal, which has dominated the headlines in Tehran in the past few days. It emerged recently that Iranian regulators had frozen the assets of a businessman, identified by some local media as Amir-Mansour Aria, accused of forging documents in order to obtain credit estimated at around 30tn rials from various financial institutions, including Bank Saderat Iran, one of the largest financial institutions in the Middle East. It is reported that Aria used the credit to buy state-owned companies such as the Khuzestan steel company during the government’s controversial privatisation scheme, which started in 2004. Some conservative websites published a leaked letter reportedly signed by Mashaei, in which he appears to give the go-ahead for the purchase of a state-owned steel company by a private company without the necessary formal procedures. The statement from the president’s office said Mashaei had done nothing wrong. “In continuation of damaging policies against the dedicated government, some newspapers and chain websites have discussed the issue of the banking scam ‘which had been investigated and found by the government’ in order to spread lies and propaganda … and accusing the clean and anti-corruption government of being involved in it,” the statement said. The fraud comes at the time when the president and his allies are caught in the middle of a bitter power struggle with conservatives close to the supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Some supporters of Khamenei believe that Mashaei is trying to increase his political influence by undermining clerical power and appealing to young people by advocating greater cultural openness. Some analysts speculated that Ahmadinejad was grooming Mashaei to succeed him in the next presidential elections. In its attempt to distance Mashaei from the scam, the statement said it reserved the right to file a complaint against the website Mashregh, the semi-official Fars news agency and newspapers including Keyhan and Tehran Emrooz, which played a key role in revealing the financial scandal in recent days. Fars is believed to be affiliated to the revolutionary guards and the head of Keyhan is appointed directly by the supreme leader. Some analysts believe privatisation has become a cover-up for redistributing the previously state-owned sectors among regime factions and various groups close to the establishment. However, the IMF in June published a statement in which it praised the economic policies of Ahmadinejad, saying the government had been successful “in reducing inequalities, improving living standards and supporting domestic demand”. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad Iran Middle East Saeed Kamali Dehghan guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …What should the White House do now that Republicans won the special elections in New York and Nevada? “Panic,” declares Democratic strategist James Carville. “The course we are on is not working,” he writes on CNN . “The time has come to demand a plan of action that requires a complete…
Continue reading …Far right’s 10-year grip on government has ended as Danes vote in a centre-left coalition led by Helle Thorning-Schmidt The far right’s 10-year grip on Denmark’s government has ended as the Danes voted for their first female prime minister, handing government to a centre-left coalition. The close general election gave victory to the social democrats, closing a decade of rightwing ascendancy during which a minority government of liberals and conservatives was kept in power by parliamentary support from the europhobic, Muslim-baiting Danish People’s party. Helle Thorning-Schmidt, the social democrat leader and daughter-in-law of Neil and Glenys Kinnock, salvaged her political career by ousting the liberal prime minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen’s coalition at her second attempt. She is expected to form a government with three other liberal and leftwing parties. Her victory, though, was narrower than predicted and could produce a fragile coalition. Her “red bloc” secured only a three-seat majority of the 175 at stake in mainland Denmark, with almost all votes counted. A further four seats reserved for faraway Greenland and the Faroes islands had still to be declared. The expectation was that the centre-left would emerge with a five-seat margin in the 179-seat chamber in Copenhagen. The social democratic win bucked the trend of politics in Europe where the centre-left has been in the doldrums, unable to capitalise on the fallout from the 2008 financial and economic crisis and stagnation in the EU while also failing to come up with attractive policies on other potent issues such as immigration and Islam. European centre-left leaders claimed to detect a shift in the public mood ahead of elections in France and Italy next year. The DPP, whose influence has forced the passage of dozens of laws countering immigration and whose success over the past decade has made it the model for likeminded parties in Sweden, Finland and The Netherlands who have chalked up notable gains over the past two years, conceded defeat and promised robust opposition. “Immigration policy is our lifeblood. Do you think they can get by without us? No, they can’t,” declared Pia Kjaersgaard, the party leader. The far right has succeeded in making its tough anti-immigrant position the Danish mainstream stance. Thorning-Schmidt is not expected to veer radically from that, but two of her proposed coalition partners, the Social Liberal party and the Red-Green Alliance, performed strongly in the election and espouse less restrictive immigration policies. Analysts said that in a society that prizes consensus, major changes in key policy areas were unlikely. But with economic stagnation and a rising budget deficit dominating the campaign, the outgoing government promised spending cuts while Thorning-Schmidt argued for more investment in education, welfare, and infrastructure. Given the austerity policies favoured across Europe by the dominant centre-right as the response to the lack of growth, Denmark will be watched to see whether the new government will take a different approach and succeed. Denmark The far right Europe Ian Traynor Lars Eriksen guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …If you’re paranoid that the Mayans might have been right about the Dec. 21, 2012 apocalypse, then maybe you should start sucking up to the people at Pink Visual. The LA-based porn studio says it’s building a lavish “post-apocalyptic” bunker, complete with fully-stocked bars, performance stages, and a studio to…
Continue reading …At just 21 years old, Dakota Meyer charged into a firefight in Afghanistan—five times—to save 36 lives from an ambush, and today he will become the first living Marine to receive the Medal of Honor since the Vietnam War. But before the ceremony honoring his actions on September…
Continue reading …Mommie Dearest is about to get her comeuppance once more, in the form of naked home videos. Christina Crawford, who penned the famous exposé on celebrity mother Joan Crawford, is now developing a one-woman show called Surviving Mommie Dearest , in which she will reveal new details about her upbringing. She’ll…
Continue reading …Peter Bryan, who smashed fellow patient’s head on floor because ‘he wanted to eat him’, not adequately assessed A man who attacked and killed a fellow patient at a high-security psychiatric hospital because he “wanted to eat him” was not being watched properly, and had not been adequately assessed, an inquest jury ruled on Thursday. Peter Bryan “smashed” Richard Loudwell’s head on the floor at Broadmoor hospital and tied a ligature around his neck on April 25 2004, an inquest at Berkshire coroners court heard. Loudwell, 60, who was admitted to Broadmoor in January that year, was taken to Frimley Park hospital in Surrey but died 41 days later, never having regained consciousness. The jury was told Bryan had attacked a 21-year-old woman, hitting her on the head around six times with a claw hammer in 1993. He later pleaded guilty to manslaughter on grounds of diminished responsibility. Bryan spent eight years at Rampton hospital and was eventually allowed back into society, but later attacked and killed a man, named in reports as Brian Cherry on February 17 2004. The victim had been dismembered and officers found a frying pan on the stove with tissue from the dead man’s brain. Bryan told officers: “I ate his brains with butter. It was really nice.” The killer was admitted to Broadmoor’s Luton ward on April 15 2004, after a stay at Belmarsh prison where he was described as “unpredictable”; presenting a “grave risk to others” and “extremely dangerous”. He was put in seclusion but four days after his arrival was allowed to mingle with patients under “general observations” or 15-minute checks, the inquest was told. But just after 6pm on April 25 he attacked Loudwell in the dining room of Luton ward. At the conclusion of the inquest, the jury ruled Loudwell died of bronchopneumonia, a hypoxic brain injury, ligature strangulation and blunt trauma to the head. Recording a narrative verdict, the jury said the dining room was not adequately observed by nursing staff at the time of the attack. Jurors also found Bryan’s mental state had not been adequately examined before his release from seclusion on April 19, or between that date and the attack on April 25. “Until such a mental state examination was completed, Peter Bryan should have been on higher observations than the general level. Such failure may have contributed to Richard Loudwell’s death.” The verdict said the absence of one or more of several factors may have contributed to Loudwell’s death. These included a pre-admission nursing report, a clinical team meeting, an adequate mental state examination, a formal written risk assessment and medical staff regularly seeing Bryan when he was out of seclusion. The inquest was told there were 19 patients in Luton ward on the day of the attack on Loudwell. Nine members of staff were present for the afternoon shift. Joanne Fisher, registered mental nurse and team leader on the ward, described finding Loudwell with head injuries on the floor of the ward dining room. In a statement read by Berkshire coroner Peter Bedford, she said Bryan told her: “I got him from behind, I put a ligature around his neck so that he wouldn’t make a noise, and I smashed his head.” She added: “Mr Bryan said he had been thinking about it for a few days. He also said: ‘I wanted to eat him.’” From Fisher’s statements, the inquest heard Loudwell was “hard to work with”, “generally unco-operative” and had complained of bullying. He had gone against advice from staff not to disclose the offence for which he was in Broadmoor, the inquest heard, and one senior member of nursing staff described him as the “most unpopular patient I have ever met”, saying it was “inevitable” that “sooner or later” he would be assaulted. But according to Fisher’s statement, he had started to “interact” more and shortly before he was attacked was seen playing cards with patients. She said she was not aware of Bryan being involved in bullying Loudwell. In the jury’s narrative verdict, they said staff should have known both men were in the dining room, but “having regard to Peter Bryan’s presentation whilst in Broadmoor”, it should not have caused concern that they were in the room together. Crime guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …