Founder announces suspension of publishing and says site has been deprived of 95% of its revenue and could fold by new year WikiLeaks could be driven out of existence by the new year if it is unable to challenge a financial blockade by banks and credit card companies including Visa, MasterCard and PayPal, the website’s founder Julian Assange has said. Announcing a “temporary suspension” of the whistleblowing website’s publishing activities, Assange said the site had been deprived of 95% of its revenue by the “dangerous, oppressive and undemocratic” blockade, and now needed to direct its energy purely into “aggressive fundraising” to fight for the organisation’s survival. “This financial blockade is an existential threat to WikiLeaks. If the blockade is not borne down by the end of the year the organisation cannot continue its work,” Assange told a news conference in central London. The announcement is the most open acknowledgement of the site’s perilous financial situation since a clutch of financial operators blocked donations in the days after its publication of leaked US embassy cables in November last year. Paypal, Visa, MasterCard, Bank of America, Western Union and Post Finance cut financial ties following the release, through the Guardian and other media partners, while Every DNS withdrew its domain hosting service. The website has begun “pre-litigation action” in Britain, Iceland, Denmark, Belgium, the United States and Australia against the blockade, said Assange, and an action pressing the European competition authorities to investigate the “wrongdoing of Visa and MasterCard” is ongoing. Assange said the financial companies had bowed to pressure from “a political grouping in the US” to block payments to the site, while the US treasury, among other organisations, had found no grounds for the blockade. “The most powerful players in the banking industry have been shown to be an arm of rightwing America,” he said, adding: “A handful of US financial companies cannot be allowed to decide how the whole world votes with its pocket.” Donations had slumped from a monthly average of €100,000 (£87,000) at the end of 2010 to an average of €6-7,000 during 2010. Based on the rate of donations on the day the blockade was imposed, WikiLeaks argues it has been deprived of between €40m and €50m. Assange, 40, remains on bail pending a ruling on his appeal against extradition to Sweden to answer allegations of rape and sexual assault. Asked about his own legal fees in that case, he said: “WikiLeaks collected monies have never gone to the Swedish case to which I am subject.” He is soliciting donations towards his personal legal fees, but through separate accounts, he said. The website needs $3.5m (£2.2m) to get through the next 12 months, Assange said. “Unusually for a hi-tech organisation,” he said, “it is now accepting cheques and cash sent in the post as well as donations via more modern means such as by text message.” A new fundraising page on the WikiLeaks website urges supporters to use bank transfers, post cash or cheques or buy “revenue-generating gifts” – WikiLeaks- or Assange-branded merchandise including T-shirts and wallets and “dog bandanas” – to raise money. A number of smaller online suppliers including BitCoin and Flattr will process WikiLeaks donations. Assange acknowledged, however, that the organisation would also need to recruit “a constellation of wealthy individuals from different nations” to help it to meet legal and publishing costs. • James Ball on why the bankers’ blockade of WikiLeaks must end WikiLeaks Julian Assange Esther Addley guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Founder announces suspension of publishing and says site has been deprived of 95% of its revenue and could fold by new year WikiLeaks could be driven out of existence by the new year if it is unable to challenge a financial blockade by banks and credit card companies including Visa, MasterCard and PayPal, the website’s founder Julian Assange has said. Announcing a “temporary suspension” of the whistleblowing website’s publishing activities, Assange said the site had been deprived of 95% of its revenue by the “dangerous, oppressive and undemocratic” blockade, and now needed to direct its energy purely into “aggressive fundraising” to fight for the organisation’s survival. “This financial blockade is an existential threat to WikiLeaks. If the blockade is not borne down by the end of the year the organisation cannot continue its work,” Assange told a news conference in central London. The announcement is the most open acknowledgement of the site’s perilous financial situation since a clutch of financial operators blocked donations in the days after its publication of leaked US embassy cables in November last year. Paypal, Visa, MasterCard, Bank of America, Western Union and Post Finance cut financial ties following the release, through the Guardian and other media partners, while Every DNS withdrew its domain hosting service. The website has begun “pre-litigation action” in Britain, Iceland, Denmark, Belgium, the United States and Australia against the blockade, said Assange, and an action pressing the European competition authorities to investigate the “wrongdoing of Visa and MasterCard” is ongoing. Assange said the financial companies had bowed to pressure from “a political grouping in the US” to block payments to the site, while the US treasury, among other organisations, had found no grounds for the blockade. “The most powerful players in the banking industry have been shown to be an arm of rightwing America,” he said, adding: “A handful of US financial companies cannot be allowed to decide how the whole world votes with its pocket.” Donations had slumped from a monthly average of €100,000 (£87,000) at the end of 2010 to an average of €6-7,000 during 2010. Based on the rate of donations on the day the blockade was imposed, WikiLeaks argues it has been deprived of between €40m and €50m. Assange, 40, remains on bail pending a ruling on his appeal against extradition to Sweden to answer allegations of rape and sexual assault. Asked about his own legal fees in that case, he said: “WikiLeaks collected monies have never gone to the Swedish case to which I am subject.” He is soliciting donations towards his personal legal fees, but through separate accounts, he said. The website needs $3.5m (£2.2m) to get through the next 12 months, Assange said. “Unusually for a hi-tech organisation,” he said, “it is now accepting cheques and cash sent in the post as well as donations via more modern means such as by text message.” A new fundraising page on the WikiLeaks website urges supporters to use bank transfers, post cash or cheques or buy “revenue-generating gifts” – WikiLeaks- or Assange-branded merchandise including T-shirts and wallets and “dog bandanas” – to raise money. A number of smaller online suppliers including BitCoin and Flattr will process WikiLeaks donations. Assange acknowledged, however, that the organisation would also need to recruit “a constellation of wealthy individuals from different nations” to help it to meet legal and publishing costs. • James Ball on why the bankers’ blockade of WikiLeaks must end WikiLeaks Julian Assange Esther Addley guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …The world’s population is set to hit 7 billion within a week, according to UN estimates, and we’re looking at 10 billion people by century’s end. And that raises a new challenge for Westerners, who must must “shake off, at last, the view that large and growing numbers of people…
Continue reading …Saturday Night Live star Darrell Hammond, perhaps best known for his dead-on Bill Clinton impression, confesses in a new book that he once had to be taken from work “in a straitjacket” after an alcohol binge in 1998. “I kept a pint of Remy in my desk at work,” Hammond…
Continue reading …It was an emotional Saturday night for Jennifer Lopez, who apparently thought it would be a good idea to rehash all of her biggest romantic relationships—onstage—just a few months after splitting from her husband. J.Lo was performing an acoustic version of “If You Had My Love” at…
Continue reading …News Corp’s shareholders lodge protest vote against James and Lachlan Murdoch following media company’s annual meeting News Corporation’s shareholders lodged a massive protest vote against James and Lachlan Murdoch following the scandal-torn media company’s annual meeting last week. A majority of independent shareholders voted against the re-election of chairman Rupert Murdoch’s sons James and Lachlan Murdoch. James Murdoch received the largest vote against his re-election at 35%. James, 38, faces a second grilling in the Parliament next month over phone-hacking at one of News Corp’s UK newspapers. Some 34% of shareholders voted against Lachlan Murdoch 40, while 14% voted against Rupert, chairman and chief executive officer. The votes are a particular embarrassment as Murdoch went into the meeting with at least 47% of voting shares on his side, thanks to the family’s control of the company’s voting shares and the support of their largest outside shareholder, Saudi Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal. Thanks to the Murdoch’s controlling share interest the company defeated attempts to throw the Murdochs and others off the board from major shareholders including the giant Californian pension funds CalPERS and CalSTRS, the Church of England and Hermes, the BT pension fund. A combative Murdoch faced hostile shareholders at the company’s meeting in Los Angeles on Friday but delayed releasing the results of its ballot until late Monday. Father Seamus Finn of the Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility, who attended the meeting, said: “The vote clearly demonstrates a profound lack of confidence in this company’s leadership.” News Corporation Phone hacking United States Media business Newspapers & magazines Newspapers Dominic Rushe guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Moderate Islamist party An-Nahda tipped for victory in Tunisia’s first free elections nine months after people’s revolution The moderate Islamist party An-Nahda is tipped for a historic victory in Tunisia’s first free elections, the first vote of the Arab spring. Nine months after a people’s revolution ousted the dictator Zine Al Abidine Ben Ali and sparked the Arab spring, Tunisians turned out in record numbers to vote for a caretaker assembly that has to rewrite the country’s constitution and govern until parliamentary elections in a year’s time. An-Nahda, which was banned for 10 years and brutally repressed under Ben Ali, with activists exiled, tortured and imprisoned,said it had taken the biggest share of the vote based on early predictions before the official results expected . The party campaigned on a moderate, pro-democracy stance that sought to allay secularist fears by vowing to respect Tunisia’s strong secular tradition and the most advanced women’s rights in the Arab world. The party compares itself to Turkey’s Islamist-rooted ruling Justice and Development party (AKP) – liberal and socially conservative. Said Ferjani, from An-Nahda’s political bureau, said: “We have to be careful about figures until the official results, but there’s a consensus that we’re around the 40% mark. It’s something that we were expecting. “We already have our ideas about the government. We are not dogmatic; we are highly pragmatic. It will be a broad national unity government. The new reality is that we have to do what we do for the Tunisian people – we go beyond old lines of argument or disagreement.” The 217-seat assembly has a specific role: to rewrite the constitution and set the date for parliamentary elections in a year’s time. It will also form a caretaker government. Aproportional representation system meant regardless of the number of votes, no one party could take anan overall majority. An-Nahda is expected to form an alliance with the centrist secularist Ettakatol party, which is forecast to win 15-20% of the vote. The party’s leader, Dr Mustapha Ben Jafaar, was banned from running for president under the old regime. He could now become interim president with an Islamist prime minister and key ministers. The centre-left Congress for the Republic Party, led by human rights campaigner Moncef Marzouki, also did well. The centrist PDP, once the major opposition, suffered by association with the old system and performed poorly. Kais Nigrou, of the the Modernist Democratic Pole, a coalition of the centre-left which ran a secular, feminist campaign to counter An-Nahda, said: “We accept the democratic result and we’ll be in opposition. “The diversity and openness of civil secular society in Tunisia is strong and isn’t going to change. We don’t see a threat from Islamists. If 40% voted for Islamists, 60% of society did not.” An An-Nahda win would be the first Islamist election success in the Arab world since Hamas won the 2006 Palestinian vote. Islamists won a 1991 election in Algeria, Tunisia’s neighbour, but the army annulled the result, provoking years of conflict. Tunisia Africa Tunisian elections 2011 Angelique Chrisafis guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Queen Elizabeth saw more of Australia than she bargained for during her visit to Brisbane today. A construction worker gave the queen and her husband a long look at his rear end—which held an Australian flag between the cheeks—as he reportedly ran beside her motorcade for about 150…
Continue reading …NBC’s long-struggling ratings are only getting worse as the new television season gets under way. Some 3.3 million 18- to 49-year-olds have been tuning in to the network’s primetime offerings over the past four weeks, a 9.3% drop from the year before, the Wall Street Journal reports. And…
Continue reading …In last week’s angry debate, Rick Perry resurrected allegations that Mitt Romney hired a lawn service that used undocumented immigrants—and that may not be the final illegal immigrant discussion Romney gets pulled into. The Los Angeles Times reports that his 2006 health care law’s Health Safety Net program allows…
Continue reading …