International Labour Organisation said the group of developing and developed nations had seen 20m jobs disappear since the financial crisis in 2008 The world’s major economies are heading for a “massive jobs shortfall” by the end of next year if governments do not change their tack on policy, the International Labour Organisation (ILO) said in a study published on Monday. In the report, prepared with the OECD for G20 labour ministers meeting in Paris on Monday, the ILO said the group of developing and developed nations had seen 20m jobs disappear since the financial crisis in 2008. At current rates it would be impossible to recover them in the near term and there was a risk of the number doubling by the end of next year, it said. “We must act now to reverse the slowdown in employment growth and make up for the jobs lost,” ILO director general Juan Somavia said in a statement. “Employment creation has to become a top macroeconomic priority.” The number of people in work in the G20 has risen by 1% since 2010, but 1.3% annual growth is needed to return to pre-crisis employment levels by 2015, the ILO said. “However, employment growth of less than 1% cannot be excluded given the slowdown of the world economy and the anaemic growth foreseen in several G20 countries,” the report said. “Should employment grow at a rate of 0.8% until end 2012, now a distinct possibility, then the shortfall in employment would increase by some 20m to a total of 40m in G20 countries.” India and China, the world’s most populous countries, were both laggards with less than 1% annual growth in total employment, the report said, so an extra push for jobs could have a major impact on the G20. However, the report was based on figures for both countries that were not up to date. China’s jobs growth of 0.7% was for 2009, while India’s 0.4% was the average annual change between 2004-2005 and 2009-2010. After stripping out India, China and Saudi Arabia, which also used 2009 data, employment growth in the other 17 countries was 1.5%, according to a Reuters calculation based on data in the ILO report. The latest figures for other G20 countries show four with growth rates below 1%, namely Italy, France, South Africa and the United States, while two others – Japan and Spain – have seen a fall in total employment in the past year. Since the beginning of 2008, Spain, South Africa and the United States had experienced the biggest falls in employment among the G20 countries. Spain and the United States also saw the biggest rises in unemployment rates, followed by Britain. Global economy Economics Unemployment and employment statistics Job losses guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …• Ed Balls’ interviews – summary • Harriet Harman’s speech – summary • Jim Murphy’s speech – summary 12.40pm: Balls says David Cameron has described the UK as a safe haven. But it is not a safe haven for the 16,000 companies that have gone out of business this year. Or for people who have lost the education and maintenance allowance. Or for families losing child benefit. Or for young people who are out of work. Or for the millions of families struggling with higher bills. Balls ends saying that Labour must show that there’s a better way. At the end of his speech it’s not clear that he has finished – the peroration is a bit flat – and it takes delegates a while to work out that they are meant to start applauding. 12.38pm: Balls says Labour is determined to tackle short-termism in industry. The party will consider the case for a National Investment Bank for small businesses. • Labour to consider calling for a National Investment Bank for small businesses. 12.37pm: Balls says Whitehall doesn’t always know best. But we know too that government just walking away is not the answer. 12.35pm: Balls says before the election he will spell out “tough fiscal rules” that a future Labour government would have to follow. They would be independently monitored. And he says that any windfall from the sale of shares in the nationalised banks will be used to pay off national debt. 12.34pm: Balls says he does not mind whether this plan is called plan A, plan B or plan C. I don’t care what they call it. Britain just needs a plan that works. 12.31pm: Balls is now describing his five-point growth plan. 1. Repeat the bank bonus tax and use the money on a job creation scheme. 2. Bring forward investment projects. 3. Cut VAT for a temporary period. 4. Announce a one-year cut in VAT to 5% for home improvements. 5. Introduce a one-year national insurance tax break for firms that take on extra workers. (That’s interesting. There has been speculation that George Osborne is going to introduce a national insurance holiday of this kind. Balls may have shot his fox.) 12.25pm: Balls says the government is refusing to change course. But even the IMF are saying that slamming on the brakes too quickly will hit the recovery. An economic policy can only be credible if it works. But Osborne’s is “just not working”. The Lib Dems and the Tories are saying it’s all Labour’s fault. Balls says Labour could spend all it’s time defending its record. But that won’t help people who are struggling to pay the bills now. Other commentators say Labour should admit it spent too much money. Balls says Labour did make some mistakes, like the 75p tax rise for pensioners and abolishing the 10p rate of tax. Labour should have got more employers to train, it should have adopted tougher controls on immigration and it didn’t regulate the banks properly. Balls says Labour did not spend every pound wisely. But he says Labour did not over-spend. • Balls refused to apologise for Labour’s record on spending. “Don’t let anyone tell you that Labour in government was profligate with public money – when we went into the crisis with lower national debt than we inherited in 1997. 12.23pm: Balls says Cameron and Osborne did not cause the global financial crisis. But the question is: have their decisions made things better or worse. Balls says he warned a year ago that, with the economy fragile, it was not the time to “tear out the foundations of the house”. Now confidence has slumped, Balls says. The economy has flatlined and unemployment is going up. 12.21pm: Balls says the world needs a global plan for growth. But, in the EU and America, David Cameron and George Osborne are applauding austerity. This is not just a failure of leadership. It’s an abdication of responsibility too. 12.18pm: Balls praises Labour’s leader in Liverpool and in Wales for showing that Labour policies can work. He turns to the economy. These are the darkest, most dangerous times for the global economy in my lifetime. This is a global problem, he says. It is not a crisis that can be solved “country by country”. The problems are “deepening and darkening by the day”. Austerity does not work, he says. You either learn the lessons of history “or you repeat the mistakes of history”. 12.15pm: Balls says this is his first speech as shadow chancellor. He is the first Labour and Cooperative party MP to be shadow chancellor. And it’s Labour’s first conference in Liverpool since 1925. He pays tribute “to our leader and my friend, Ed Miliband”. He has shown courageous leadership on issues like phone hacking and Libya. In Miliband, Labour has a leader who is genuine, honest, principled and fair. He is a leader in whom Labour can ask the British people to put their trust. • Balls pays lavish tribute to Miliband, saying he is “a leader who speaks his mind and tells the truth”. 12.15pm: Ed Balls is speaking now. 12.11pm: Here’s the gaffe of the day. I didn’t hear Harriet Harman on Woman’s Hour, but James Chapman has posted the quote on Twitter. I hope we will have David, er, Ed, Ed Miliband elected as Prime Minister at the next election. 11.53am: So far the proceedings have been relatively thin this morning. Even Douglas Alexander, (left) the shadow foreign secretary and one of the party’s leading thinkers, did not have a great deal to say in his speech. Here are the main points. The full text is on the Labour website. • Alexander said that in the past Britain and other western countries had been too willing to support dictatorships in the Middle East. Too often in the past, the West has backed stability over democracy in the Middle East. So I’m so proud that this year, this Party, chose to stand with these young people, and against the old autocrats. That choice meant I could stand on the street in Tunis a few months ago and look them in the eye. • He said Britain should now worry more about China than Brussels. This seemed aimed at the Tory Eurosceptics. The real question for the new generation isn’t about the reach of Brussels – it’s about the rise of Beijing. For with power and money moving East, no country has an alternative but to work in partnership with other countries. • He said Britain should forge international alliances. It was important to have a foreign policy that was “realistic about what we can achieve alone, but idealistic about what we can achieve together”, he said. 11.38am: I’ve already mentioned the announcement from Jim Murphy (left) that serving and former members of the armed forces will be allowed to join Labour for £1. (See 11.01am.) Here are some of the other main points in his speech. • Murphy says Labour would always take defence seriously. “We will never wrap ourselves in the cloak of jingoism but the Labour Party will always be strong on defence,” he said. • He attacked the government for reducing military pensions, cutting army numbers and decommissioning aircraft carriers. • He said Labour would set up a Friends of the Forces organisation. It will increase Labour’s engagement with the service community. George Robertson, the former defence secretary and former Nato secretary general, will be a patron. Murphy also said Labour would voluntarily sign up to the military covenant. 11.23am: Aung San Suu Kyi (left), the Burmese opposition leader, has recorded a message for the Labour conference. It has just been shown in the conference hall. In it, she spoke about the importance of democracy. Democracy is the best system that has yet been thought up by man. It is the system that values the individual. It is the system that will help our people to live with self-respect, with freedom. This is why it always gives us the greatest pleasure to feel that we are in contact with democratic forces. It makes us feel at one with others who believe in the same values in which we believe. 11.20am: David Miliband has given an interview to the Journal in which he has played down the prospects of an early return to the shadow cabinet. This is what he said when asked about taking a job on the frontbench. I say the same thing always to everyone, which is that I think I made the right decision last year. I promised I would give Ed the space to lead the party as he sees fit, I wasn’t going to be part of a soap opera. And so I am here to support the party and support the leadership. 11.01am: Jim Murphy , the shadow defence secretary, has just delivered his speech to the conference. As Nick Hopkins wrote in the Guardian today, he announced that Labour would allow members of the armed forces to join the party for £1. He introduced Corporal Stephen Burke, who has become the first person to take advantage of the scheme. In a short speech, Burke said that servicemen and women were “ordinary people” and that they had the same concerns as civilians. Nick first wrote about this scheme in July. When his original story appeared, Ann Black, a member of Labours’ national executive committee, wrote a post on a blog dismissing the idea as a gimmick. A strange story appeared in the Guardian on July 30th claiming that Labour was set to launch an aggressive marketing campaign offering membership at 1p each to several million military veterans, including former national servicemen. This would signal that we are a party of the armed forces, and use their “unique experience and insight” to “shape the party’s culture, policy and campaigns”. This has never been raised with the NEC, and I can find no-one in authority to confirm it, so I think it can be dismissed. This does not deny the courage of those who are sent to fight and the respect in which they are held, regardless of opinions on particular wars. However the veterans’ associations themselves see it as a silly gimmick and would, like everyone else, prefer a decent pension. And many people serve their country in other ways: as unpaid carers, volunteers, and other frontline public servants, large numbers of whom – unlike most veterans – happen to be women. Party membership is still overly white, male and ageing, and initiatives should surely be aimed at increasing diversity. I’ll post some more from Murphy’s speech when I’ve read the text. 10.35am: Harriet Harman ‘s speech is now on the Labour website. Here are the main points. • Harman said multinational companies should pay more tax in Africa. Tax dodging was costing poor countries more than they receive in aid, she claimed. Africa has huge reserves of oil, gold, iron, diamonds. The biggest companies make billions of profit. They must publish what they get in profits from each country and what they pay in taxes to each country. Global companies all say they are committed to transparency – but they are not doing it. No-one can accept the situation where we have to give money to poor countries but those countries – which are rich in natural resources – don’t get their fair share of the profits from their mines. The truth is, more is lost to people in poor countries from tax dodging by global companies than is paid in aid. • She praised Andrew Mitchell, the international development secretary, for resisting pressure for international aid spending to be cut. But while Andrew Mitchell is – to his credit – fighting to live up to our 0.7% promise, most of the Tories are against it – including his fellow cabinet ministers who’re blocking the legislation they promised to put it into law. We mustn’t let aid be just the next Tory broken promise. • But she also claimed the Tories would never take a leading role on other international development issues. They’ll never tackle the unfair trade which sees rich countries get richer and the poor get poorer. They will never tackle the obscene global speculation on food and land that sees profits soar while the poor go hungry. They will never tackle climate change – which hits first and hardest at the poorest countries. That’s what Ed Miliband did when we were in government. We hear nothing of that now. The Tories’ team of men only development ministers will never be able to lead the way internationally in empowering women and girls in the developing world. 10.28am: I arrived at the conference centre well before 8am, which meant that I didn’t have to queue to get through security, but delegates and journalists who tried to get in later have had to wait for ages. One colleague told me he thought some people had been queuing for up to an hour. It seems there aren’t enough security scanners. Sky’s Jon Craig has put a post on Twitter suggesting it might be time to resurrect a famous old poster. Massive queue to get into the Labour conference. Only one entrance. Shambolic! It’s already being dubbed the “Labour isn’t working” queue. 10.21am: Ed Balls hasn’t even delivered his speech yet, but the reaction is rolling in. George Eaton at the Staggers says that committing Labour to new fiscal rules is a masterstroke. Balls’s smart calculation is that these promises will provide him with the political cover necessary to make the case for renewed stimulus, in the form of a temporary cut in VAT and other measures (he has promised to set out a five-point plan for restoring growth in his speech). As Keynes put it: “The boom, not the slump, is the right time for austerity at the Treasury.” And Fraser Nelson at Coffee House is interested in the way Balls is offering a partial apology. Read between the lines of Balls’ speech today, and you can see a man backtracking – and trying to hold on to his job. Even when Balls tells porkies, he does so with imagination and élan . 10.08am: Listening is a theme at this conference. Douglas Alexander , the shadow foreign secretary, told Sky this morning that the public were ready to listen to the party. Now, I’m not saying that people are instantly going to support the Labour Party. But I would say, even if they’re not yet willing to give us their support, my sense at this conference is they’re now willing to give us a hearing because there’s a real anxiety that the Conservatives have got this wrong. But Paul Kenny , the GMB general secretary, said that it was the Labour party that needed to think about listening. This is what he told the Today programme. I wish that when New Labour was in government they’d actually done a bit more listening to people because up through the ranks of party and the people they were warned about the impact of PFI, the long-term impact and the now the chickens are home to roost. On social housing, the pressures that would come, that was ignored, on pensions, so many issues that were clearly very, very important were ignored and we can’t go back to that. I’ve taken the quotes from PoliticsHome. 10.07am: Harriet Harman, the shadow international development secretary (and deputy Labour leader) is speaking now on international aid. I’ll post a summary of the speech when I’ve seen the text. 10.04am: Back in the conference hall, the delegates have just heard from Maryan Qasim, a former minister for women in Somalia. She said the civil war in the country had had a particularly harsh impact on the country’s women. 9.54am: David Blunkett told Today this morning that Ed Miliband had time to make an impression on the voters because Margaret Thatcher (left) was not immediately popular when she was opposition leader. I’ve taken the quote from PoliticsHome. I’m totally realistic. David Cameron and Margaret Thatcher back in the 70s – I’m so old I remember this – actually had a dip when they became leader they were not doing very well for two years. Now, Ed’s got that time to do it. Miliband may have made the comparison himself. Earlier this year the Spectator said Thatcher was “an unlikely new role model” for Miliband. I n a recent interview with Progressonline, he refused to be drawn on this, instead saying that he was not going to compare himself with anyone. 9.43am: The conference has just opened. And they’ve announced the results of the vote on the Refounding Labour proposals. They were approved by 93.92% to 6.08%. Almost all the unions voted in favour. The unions have 50% of the vote and, in that section, there was a 99.52% majority in favour. In the constituency section, 88.83% of members were in favour. Officials also announced the result of the ballot on which topics should be the subject of a contemporary motion debate. There will be debates on health and social care; jobs, growth and employment, phone hacking, public services and housing. 9.30am: More from Ed Balls. Apologies if you’re starting to feel that you’ve had enough. But there’s a lot more to come. • Balls has accused the government of wanting to provoke a strike in November to distract attention from the state of the economy. If George Osborne really wants to sort this out, he should get round the table and have serious discussions with the trade unions. I fear that what he really wants is strikes in the autumn to divert attention away from an economic plan which isn’t working. • He has said that ideally he would always want to lower taxes. This came in an interview in the Independent. My instinct is that you should always try to reduce every tax if you can. But in this parliament, the idea that the priority is going to be cutting the top rate of tax when child benefit is being cut, VAT has gone up, people are seeing their living standards squeezed, I find that very hard to see. 9.15am: If you weren’t up before 7am, you will have missed John Prescott (left) on the Today programme. And you’ll have missed a treat, because he was on top form. Essentially, he was saying that some members of the shadow cabinet should be sacked because they’re useless. The BBC has got a full report. Here are the key quotes. • Prescott said some members of the shadow cabinet should be sacked because they are ineffective. There are some people in there who are undoubtedly not carrying their weight … This is a Tory government that’s doing some outrageous things and we haven’t had many words of protest. Ed, you’re the leader, get a shadow cabinet who’ll do that. • He said Labour should stop apologising for its record. They all seem to accept that the 13 years of Labour was a failure despite the record levels of employment, record of investment in housing, minimum wage, SureStart and all that. I say stop apologising for that, stop complaining and get out campaigning. (Ed Balls wasn’t listening. See 8.29am.) 8.29am: Ed Balls (left) has now given at least three interviews this morning. Here are the highlights. I’ve taken some of the quotes from the Press Association and PoliticsHome. • Balls conceded that Labour’s reputation for economic competence had been damaged. When he was asked if he agreed that Labour’s reputation for economic competence “took a battering” in its last days in power, he replied: “Yes, of course, and it’s a big task to turn that around.” After 1979, it took Labour 18 years to restore its economic credibility. This time Labour had to restore its credibility “in this parliament. He said he did not want to make the mistake Labour made in 1992, when it was not credible on the economy. “We had nothing to say on the economy [from 1990 to 1992],” he said. “In 1992 there was a debate on tax and spend, the shadow budget. The real issue was rising unemployment, no growth. Labour wasn’t in the debate. I will not make that mistake again.” • He denied claims that he was a bully. I tell you, there is nothing more despicable than bullies. They become weak people. I had arguments with Tony Blair and Gordon Brown on some of the big issues in our country. But they weren’t weak people they were strong people and it was my job to have an argument. But bullying? No way – it’s a hideous thing, and the only thing more cowardly is people who say things anonymously to books and think they’re making a contribution to public life. They’re not. • Balls said sorry for Labour’s failure to regulate the banks properly. Asked if he would stand up and say sorry, he replied: “Yes, I have and I will. The banking crisis was a disaster. All around the world banks have behaved irresponsibly, but regulation wasn’t tough enough. We were part of that. I’m sorry for that mistake. I deeply, deeply regret it.” He made a similar comment in the Commons recently. But his apology only covered banking regulation. He did not apologise for spending too much. Balls said that he accepted that Labour, like every government, did not spent every pound of public money well. But he said he did not agree with the Tory claims that Labour spending caused the crisis. • He denied claims that he put pressure on Treasury officials to massage their growth forecasts when Labour was in government. This allegation appears in the updated edition of Anthony Seldon and Guy Lodge’s book about Gordon Brown, Brown at 10, that was featured in the Daily Mail on Saturday. We had Graham Parker, who was head of forecasting at the time and is now at the independent OBR. There is no one who could tell Graham Parker to diddle his forecasts. • Balls said he would today set out a five-point plan for restoring growth in his speech. He did not reveal the full details, but he said it would include cutting VAT and using a tax on bank bonuses to fund a job creation programme. • He said Labour would use any profit from the sale of shares in the nationalised banks to pay off national debt. “If they can make a profit on the sale of bank shares, which are all owned by the public at the moment, you should not, as Nick Clegg and George Osborne say, use that for a giveaway,” he said. “Use the bank shared to repay the national debt – that’s the responsible thing to do.” (When Gordon Brown was chancellor, he did the same when he raised more than £20bn from the sale of mobile phone licences.) • Balls said he did not accept coalition claims that the markets would panic if Britain slowed the pace of its deficit reduction programme. “The markets know that if economies aren’t growing, then you get into a vicious circle and your debt dynamics can actually make a debt unsustainable,” he said. • He said he told Gordon Brown that he would not undermine Alistair Darling when Darling was chancellor. “I said to Gordon Brown at the very beginning I would not be the Alan Walters of the Labour government who came between the prime minister and the chancellor,” Balls said. When Balls did disagree with Darling, which was “very rarely”, he spoke to him about it directly. • Balls said setting up the Office for Budget Responsibility was “the right thing to do.” 8.16am: The interview is still going on. Balls says borrowing is going to be £45bn higher than George Osborne planned because the economy is not growing. He says if the Treasury makes a profit from the sale of bank shares, that should be used to pay off the national debt. Q: What are your five points? Balls says it will involved cutting VAT and using a bank bonus tax to create jobs for young people. (These are established Labour proposals.) He says he does not want to reveal the rest of his speech now. Q: Won’t the markets take a dim view of any Labour plan to slow the deficit reduction programme? Balls says Italy’s credit rating was downgraded because its economy was not growing. Growth is vital, he says. Q: But a growth strategy in one country is very limited? That’s right, says Balls. This is the most dangerous moment for the world economy in his lifetime. David Cameron is going to international meetings recommending more cuts. But that is not working. Cameron and Osborne are stuck in a “false consciousness” about the economy. Q: When you were in government, did you ever think you would have to say sorry so clearly? Balls says he was children’s secretary. Q: But according to Alistair Darling you were the shadow chancellor. Balls says that claim was not in Darling’s book, only in a blog purporting to reveal what it would say. He says that he told Gordon Brown that he did not want to be the Alan Walters of the Labour government. (Walters was the economic adviser who triggered Nigel Lawson’s resignation as chancellor because Margaret Thatcher trusted him more than Lawson.) He did not have many disagreements with Darling. When he did disagree with Darling, he told him to his face. The interview ends. Jim Naughtie invites Nick Robinson to comment. Robinson mentions the speech that David Miliband would have given to the Labour conference if he had won the leadership last year. (It was published in the Guardian earlier this year.) In that, Miliband said Labour should never have promised an end to boom and bust. Balls comes in. He says he would have applauded that speech. I’ll summarise the highlights shortly. 8.11am: Ed Balls is being interviewed on the Today programme now. Q: Do you accept that Labour’s reputation for economic competence took a battering when you were in power? Yes, says Balls. That’s why it is important for Labour to be credible. He says people have to believe what Labour says. That’s why he has to be very careful what he says. He cannot promise to reverse every cut or tax rise. But he can show that there is a different economic strategy. Q: You’ve got to stand up and say sorry, haven’t you? Yes, says Balls. I have and I will. He says Labour got banking regulation wrong. Q: You proposed soft-touch regulation. Balls says that wasn’t his phrase. People want Labour to acknowledge the mistake. But most people are forward looking too. Q: People are angry. Balls says: “I feel pretty angry too.” He says he has said sorry for Labour’s failure to regulate the banks properly. Today he will set out a five-point plan for growth. But people need to be able to trust Labour. If they don’t, they won’t listen to the five-point plan. 8.06am: Ed Balls’ speech to the Labour conference will be the highlight today. Last year Balls was accused of doom-mongering when he came close to predicting that Britain would slip into a double-dip recession as a result of George Osborne’s economic policies. A year later, growth is flat and Balls’s warnings are looking prescient. But Labour does not appear to have benefited from this at all. As the figures on the YouGov tracker poll show (see page 8 of the issues 1 document), voters still trust the Conservatives more on the economy than Labour. Labour’s hopes of winning the next election dependent, to a large extent, on turning that around. Balls will be hoping that his speech, and the announcements he’s making, will play a part in this process. Balls has already been giving interviews and he’s about to go on the Today programme. I’ll be covering that in full. As for the rest of the conference, here’s today’s programme. 9.30am: Conference starts • Carwyn Jones , first minister of Wales • Glenis Willmott , leader of the Labour MEPs • Session on Britain in the World, with speeches from Harriet Harman , the shadow international development secretary, Jim Murphy , the shadow defence secretary and Douglas Alexander , the shadow foreign secretary. Murphy is going to offer cut-price Labour party membership to former and serving members of the armed forces and Alexander is going to say that the west, including Britain when Labour was in power, has too often promoted stability instead of democracy abroad . 12pm: Session on prosperity and work, with a speech from Ed Balls , the shadow chancellor. As Patrick Wintour reports in the Guardian today, Balls is going to say that Labour will go into the next election with demanding and independently scrutinised fiscal rules for cutting the deficit . 12.45pm: Break for lunch. 1pm: Douglas Alexander , Liam Byrne , Mary Creagh and Lord Glasman speak at a Guardian fringe on What Labour must do next? 2.15pm: Session on Prosperity and Work, with speeches from John Denham , the shadow business secretary, Maria Eagle , the shadow transport secretary and Liam Byrne , the shadow work and pensions secretary. Denham is going to propose an overhaul of consumer protection rights . • Scottish report, with speeches from Ann McKechin , the shadow Scottish secretary, and Iain Gray , the leader of the Scottish Labour party. As usual, I’ll be covering all the conference news, as well as looking at the papers and bringing you the best comment from the web. I’ll post a lunchtime summary at around 1pm and an afternoon one at about 5pm. My colleague Paul Owen will then take over the blog for the rest of the evening. Labour conference 2011 Ed Balls Labour conference Labour Ed Miliband Economic policy Andrew Sparrow guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …• Ed Balls’ interviews – summary • Harriet Harman’s speech – summary • Jim Murphy’s speech – summary 12.40pm: Balls says David Cameron has described the UK as a safe haven. But it is not a safe haven for the 16,000 companies that have gone out of business this year. Or for people who have lost the education and maintenance allowance. Or for families losing child benefit. Or for young people who are out of work. Or for the millions of families struggling with higher bills. Balls ends saying that Labour must show that there’s a better way. At the end of his speech it’s not clear that he has finished – the peroration is a bit flat – and it takes delegates a while to work out that they are meant to start applauding. 12.38pm: Balls says Labour is determined to tackle short-termism in industry. The party will consider the case for a National Investment Bank for small businesses. • Labour to consider calling for a National Investment Bank for small businesses. 12.37pm: Balls says Whitehall doesn’t always know best. But we know too that government just walking away is not the answer. 12.35pm: Balls says before the election he will spell out “tough fiscal rules” that a future Labour government would have to follow. They would be independently monitored. And he says that any windfall from the sale of shares in the nationalised banks will be used to pay off national debt. 12.34pm: Balls says he does not mind whether this plan is called plan A, plan B or plan C. I don’t care what they call it. Britain just needs a plan that works. 12.31pm: Balls is now describing his five-point growth plan. 1. Repeat the bank bonus tax and use the money on a job creation scheme. 2. Bring forward investment projects. 3. Cut VAT for a temporary period. 4. Announce a one-year cut in VAT to 5% for home improvements. 5. Introduce a one-year national insurance tax break for firms that take on extra workers. (That’s interesting. There has been speculation that George Osborne is going to introduce a national insurance holiday of this kind. Balls may have shot his fox.) 12.25pm: Balls says the government is refusing to change course. But even the IMF are saying that slamming on the brakes too quickly will hit the recovery. An economic policy can only be credible if it works. But Osborne’s is “just not working”. The Lib Dems and the Tories are saying it’s all Labour’s fault. Balls says Labour could spend all it’s time defending its record. But that won’t help people who are struggling to pay the bills now. Other commentators say Labour should admit it spent too much money. Balls says Labour did make some mistakes, like the 75p tax rise for pensioners and abolishing the 10p rate of tax. Labour should have got more employers to train, it should have adopted tougher controls on immigration and it didn’t regulate the banks properly. Balls says Labour did not spend every pound wisely. But he says Labour did not over-spend. • Balls refused to apologise for Labour’s record on spending. “Don’t let anyone tell you that Labour in government was profligate with public money – when we went into the crisis with lower national debt than we inherited in 1997. 12.23pm: Balls says Cameron and Osborne did not cause the global financial crisis. But the question is: have their decisions made things better or worse. Balls says he warned a year ago that, with the economy fragile, it was not the time to “tear out the foundations of the house”. Now confidence has slumped, Balls says. The economy has flatlined and unemployment is going up. 12.21pm: Balls says the world needs a global plan for growth. But, in the EU and America, David Cameron and George Osborne are applauding austerity. This is not just a failure of leadership. It’s an abdication of responsibility too. 12.18pm: Balls praises Labour’s leader in Liverpool and in Wales for showing that Labour policies can work. He turns to the economy. These are the darkest, most dangerous times for the global economy in my lifetime. This is a global problem, he says. It is not a crisis that can be solved “country by country”. The problems are “deepening and darkening by the day”. Austerity does not work, he says. You either learn the lessons of history “or you repeat the mistakes of history”. 12.15pm: Balls says this is his first speech as shadow chancellor. He is the first Labour and Cooperative party MP to be shadow chancellor. And it’s Labour’s first conference in Liverpool since 1925. He pays tribute “to our leader and my friend, Ed Miliband”. He has shown courageous leadership on issues like phone hacking and Libya. In Miliband, Labour has a leader who is genuine, honest, principled and fair. He is a leader in whom Labour can ask the British people to put their trust. • Balls pays lavish tribute to Miliband, saying he is “a leader who speaks his mind and tells the truth”. 12.15pm: Ed Balls is speaking now. 12.11pm: Here’s the gaffe of the day. I didn’t hear Harriet Harman on Woman’s Hour, but James Chapman has posted the quote on Twitter. I hope we will have David, er, Ed, Ed Miliband elected as Prime Minister at the next election. 11.53am: So far the proceedings have been relatively thin this morning. Even Douglas Alexander, (left) the shadow foreign secretary and one of the party’s leading thinkers, did not have a great deal to say in his speech. Here are the main points. The full text is on the Labour website. • Alexander said that in the past Britain and other western countries had been too willing to support dictatorships in the Middle East. Too often in the past, the West has backed stability over democracy in the Middle East. So I’m so proud that this year, this Party, chose to stand with these young people, and against the old autocrats. That choice meant I could stand on the street in Tunis a few months ago and look them in the eye. • He said Britain should now worry more about China than Brussels. This seemed aimed at the Tory Eurosceptics. The real question for the new generation isn’t about the reach of Brussels – it’s about the rise of Beijing. For with power and money moving East, no country has an alternative but to work in partnership with other countries. • He said Britain should forge international alliances. It was important to have a foreign policy that was “realistic about what we can achieve alone, but idealistic about what we can achieve together”, he said. 11.38am: I’ve already mentioned the announcement from Jim Murphy (left) that serving and former members of the armed forces will be allowed to join Labour for £1. (See 11.01am.) Here are some of the other main points in his speech. • Murphy says Labour would always take defence seriously. “We will never wrap ourselves in the cloak of jingoism but the Labour Party will always be strong on defence,” he said. • He attacked the government for reducing military pensions, cutting army numbers and decommissioning aircraft carriers. • He said Labour would set up a Friends of the Forces organisation. It will increase Labour’s engagement with the service community. George Robertson, the former defence secretary and former Nato secretary general, will be a patron. Murphy also said Labour would voluntarily sign up to the military covenant. 11.23am: Aung San Suu Kyi (left), the Burmese opposition leader, has recorded a message for the Labour conference. It has just been shown in the conference hall. In it, she spoke about the importance of democracy. Democracy is the best system that has yet been thought up by man. It is the system that values the individual. It is the system that will help our people to live with self-respect, with freedom. This is why it always gives us the greatest pleasure to feel that we are in contact with democratic forces. It makes us feel at one with others who believe in the same values in which we believe. 11.20am: David Miliband has given an interview to the Journal in which he has played down the prospects of an early return to the shadow cabinet. This is what he said when asked about taking a job on the frontbench. I say the same thing always to everyone, which is that I think I made the right decision last year. I promised I would give Ed the space to lead the party as he sees fit, I wasn’t going to be part of a soap opera. And so I am here to support the party and support the leadership. 11.01am: Jim Murphy , the shadow defence secretary, has just delivered his speech to the conference. As Nick Hopkins wrote in the Guardian today, he announced that Labour would allow members of the armed forces to join the party for £1. He introduced Corporal Stephen Burke, who has become the first person to take advantage of the scheme. In a short speech, Burke said that servicemen and women were “ordinary people” and that they had the same concerns as civilians. Nick first wrote about this scheme in July. When his original story appeared, Ann Black, a member of Labours’ national executive committee, wrote a post on a blog dismissing the idea as a gimmick. A strange story appeared in the Guardian on July 30th claiming that Labour was set to launch an aggressive marketing campaign offering membership at 1p each to several million military veterans, including former national servicemen. This would signal that we are a party of the armed forces, and use their “unique experience and insight” to “shape the party’s culture, policy and campaigns”. This has never been raised with the NEC, and I can find no-one in authority to confirm it, so I think it can be dismissed. This does not deny the courage of those who are sent to fight and the respect in which they are held, regardless of opinions on particular wars. However the veterans’ associations themselves see it as a silly gimmick and would, like everyone else, prefer a decent pension. And many people serve their country in other ways: as unpaid carers, volunteers, and other frontline public servants, large numbers of whom – unlike most veterans – happen to be women. Party membership is still overly white, male and ageing, and initiatives should surely be aimed at increasing diversity. I’ll post some more from Murphy’s speech when I’ve read the text. 10.35am: Harriet Harman ‘s speech is now on the Labour website. Here are the main points. • Harman said multinational companies should pay more tax in Africa. Tax dodging was costing poor countries more than they receive in aid, she claimed. Africa has huge reserves of oil, gold, iron, diamonds. The biggest companies make billions of profit. They must publish what they get in profits from each country and what they pay in taxes to each country. Global companies all say they are committed to transparency – but they are not doing it. No-one can accept the situation where we have to give money to poor countries but those countries – which are rich in natural resources – don’t get their fair share of the profits from their mines. The truth is, more is lost to people in poor countries from tax dodging by global companies than is paid in aid. • She praised Andrew Mitchell, the international development secretary, for resisting pressure for international aid spending to be cut. But while Andrew Mitchell is – to his credit – fighting to live up to our 0.7% promise, most of the Tories are against it – including his fellow cabinet ministers who’re blocking the legislation they promised to put it into law. We mustn’t let aid be just the next Tory broken promise. • But she also claimed the Tories would never take a leading role on other international development issues. They’ll never tackle the unfair trade which sees rich countries get richer and the poor get poorer. They will never tackle the obscene global speculation on food and land that sees profits soar while the poor go hungry. They will never tackle climate change – which hits first and hardest at the poorest countries. That’s what Ed Miliband did when we were in government. We hear nothing of that now. The Tories’ team of men only development ministers will never be able to lead the way internationally in empowering women and girls in the developing world. 10.28am: I arrived at the conference centre well before 8am, which meant that I didn’t have to queue to get through security, but delegates and journalists who tried to get in later have had to wait for ages. One colleague told me he thought some people had been queuing for up to an hour. It seems there aren’t enough security scanners. Sky’s Jon Craig has put a post on Twitter suggesting it might be time to resurrect a famous old poster. Massive queue to get into the Labour conference. Only one entrance. Shambolic! It’s already being dubbed the “Labour isn’t working” queue. 10.21am: Ed Balls hasn’t even delivered his speech yet, but the reaction is rolling in. George Eaton at the Staggers says that committing Labour to new fiscal rules is a masterstroke. Balls’s smart calculation is that these promises will provide him with the political cover necessary to make the case for renewed stimulus, in the form of a temporary cut in VAT and other measures (he has promised to set out a five-point plan for restoring growth in his speech). As Keynes put it: “The boom, not the slump, is the right time for austerity at the Treasury.” And Fraser Nelson at Coffee House is interested in the way Balls is offering a partial apology. Read between the lines of Balls’ speech today, and you can see a man backtracking – and trying to hold on to his job. Even when Balls tells porkies, he does so with imagination and élan . 10.08am: Listening is a theme at this conference. Douglas Alexander , the shadow foreign secretary, told Sky this morning that the public were ready to listen to the party. Now, I’m not saying that people are instantly going to support the Labour Party. But I would say, even if they’re not yet willing to give us their support, my sense at this conference is they’re now willing to give us a hearing because there’s a real anxiety that the Conservatives have got this wrong. But Paul Kenny , the GMB general secretary, said that it was the Labour party that needed to think about listening. This is what he told the Today programme. I wish that when New Labour was in government they’d actually done a bit more listening to people because up through the ranks of party and the people they were warned about the impact of PFI, the long-term impact and the now the chickens are home to roost. On social housing, the pressures that would come, that was ignored, on pensions, so many issues that were clearly very, very important were ignored and we can’t go back to that. I’ve taken the quotes from PoliticsHome. 10.07am: Harriet Harman, the shadow international development secretary (and deputy Labour leader) is speaking now on international aid. I’ll post a summary of the speech when I’ve seen the text. 10.04am: Back in the conference hall, the delegates have just heard from Maryan Qasim, a former minister for women in Somalia. She said the civil war in the country had had a particularly harsh impact on the country’s women. 9.54am: David Blunkett told Today this morning that Ed Miliband had time to make an impression on the voters because Margaret Thatcher (left) was not immediately popular when she was opposition leader. I’ve taken the quote from PoliticsHome. I’m totally realistic. David Cameron and Margaret Thatcher back in the 70s – I’m so old I remember this – actually had a dip when they became leader they were not doing very well for two years. Now, Ed’s got that time to do it. Miliband may have made the comparison himself. Earlier this year the Spectator said Thatcher was “an unlikely new role model” for Miliband. I n a recent interview with Progressonline, he refused to be drawn on this, instead saying that he was not going to compare himself with anyone. 9.43am: The conference has just opened. And they’ve announced the results of the vote on the Refounding Labour proposals. They were approved by 93.92% to 6.08%. Almost all the unions voted in favour. The unions have 50% of the vote and, in that section, there was a 99.52% majority in favour. In the constituency section, 88.83% of members were in favour. Officials also announced the result of the ballot on which topics should be the subject of a contemporary motion debate. There will be debates on health and social care; jobs, growth and employment, phone hacking, public services and housing. 9.30am: More from Ed Balls. Apologies if you’re starting to feel that you’ve had enough. But there’s a lot more to come. • Balls has accused the government of wanting to provoke a strike in November to distract attention from the state of the economy. If George Osborne really wants to sort this out, he should get round the table and have serious discussions with the trade unions. I fear that what he really wants is strikes in the autumn to divert attention away from an economic plan which isn’t working. • He has said that ideally he would always want to lower taxes. This came in an interview in the Independent. My instinct is that you should always try to reduce every tax if you can. But in this parliament, the idea that the priority is going to be cutting the top rate of tax when child benefit is being cut, VAT has gone up, people are seeing their living standards squeezed, I find that very hard to see. 9.15am: If you weren’t up before 7am, you will have missed John Prescott (left) on the Today programme. And you’ll have missed a treat, because he was on top form. Essentially, he was saying that some members of the shadow cabinet should be sacked because they’re useless. The BBC has got a full report. Here are the key quotes. • Prescott said some members of the shadow cabinet should be sacked because they are ineffective. There are some people in there who are undoubtedly not carrying their weight … This is a Tory government that’s doing some outrageous things and we haven’t had many words of protest. Ed, you’re the leader, get a shadow cabinet who’ll do that. • He said Labour should stop apologising for its record. They all seem to accept that the 13 years of Labour was a failure despite the record levels of employment, record of investment in housing, minimum wage, SureStart and all that. I say stop apologising for that, stop complaining and get out campaigning. (Ed Balls wasn’t listening. See 8.29am.) 8.29am: Ed Balls (left) has now given at least three interviews this morning. Here are the highlights. I’ve taken some of the quotes from the Press Association and PoliticsHome. • Balls conceded that Labour’s reputation for economic competence had been damaged. When he was asked if he agreed that Labour’s reputation for economic competence “took a battering” in its last days in power, he replied: “Yes, of course, and it’s a big task to turn that around.” After 1979, it took Labour 18 years to restore its economic credibility. This time Labour had to restore its credibility “in this parliament. He said he did not want to make the mistake Labour made in 1992, when it was not credible on the economy. “We had nothing to say on the economy [from 1990 to 1992],” he said. “In 1992 there was a debate on tax and spend, the shadow budget. The real issue was rising unemployment, no growth. Labour wasn’t in the debate. I will not make that mistake again.” • He denied claims that he was a bully. I tell you, there is nothing more despicable than bullies. They become weak people. I had arguments with Tony Blair and Gordon Brown on some of the big issues in our country. But they weren’t weak people they were strong people and it was my job to have an argument. But bullying? No way – it’s a hideous thing, and the only thing more cowardly is people who say things anonymously to books and think they’re making a contribution to public life. They’re not. • Balls said sorry for Labour’s failure to regulate the banks properly. Asked if he would stand up and say sorry, he replied: “Yes, I have and I will. The banking crisis was a disaster. All around the world banks have behaved irresponsibly, but regulation wasn’t tough enough. We were part of that. I’m sorry for that mistake. I deeply, deeply regret it.” He made a similar comment in the Commons recently. But his apology only covered banking regulation. He did not apologise for spending too much. Balls said that he accepted that Labour, like every government, did not spent every pound of public money well. But he said he did not agree with the Tory claims that Labour spending caused the crisis. • He denied claims that he put pressure on Treasury officials to massage their growth forecasts when Labour was in government. This allegation appears in the updated edition of Anthony Seldon and Guy Lodge’s book about Gordon Brown, Brown at 10, that was featured in the Daily Mail on Saturday. We had Graham Parker, who was head of forecasting at the time and is now at the independent OBR. There is no one who could tell Graham Parker to diddle his forecasts. • Balls said he would today set out a five-point plan for restoring growth in his speech. He did not reveal the full details, but he said it would include cutting VAT and using a tax on bank bonuses to fund a job creation programme. • He said Labour would use any profit from the sale of shares in the nationalised banks to pay off national debt. “If they can make a profit on the sale of bank shares, which are all owned by the public at the moment, you should not, as Nick Clegg and George Osborne say, use that for a giveaway,” he said. “Use the bank shared to repay the national debt – that’s the responsible thing to do.” (When Gordon Brown was chancellor, he did the same when he raised more than £20bn from the sale of mobile phone licences.) • Balls said he did not accept coalition claims that the markets would panic if Britain slowed the pace of its deficit reduction programme. “The markets know that if economies aren’t growing, then you get into a vicious circle and your debt dynamics can actually make a debt unsustainable,” he said. • He said he told Gordon Brown that he would not undermine Alistair Darling when Darling was chancellor. “I said to Gordon Brown at the very beginning I would not be the Alan Walters of the Labour government who came between the prime minister and the chancellor,” Balls said. When Balls did disagree with Darling, which was “very rarely”, he spoke to him about it directly. • Balls said setting up the Office for Budget Responsibility was “the right thing to do.” 8.16am: The interview is still going on. Balls says borrowing is going to be £45bn higher than George Osborne planned because the economy is not growing. He says if the Treasury makes a profit from the sale of bank shares, that should be used to pay off the national debt. Q: What are your five points? Balls says it will involved cutting VAT and using a bank bonus tax to create jobs for young people. (These are established Labour proposals.) He says he does not want to reveal the rest of his speech now. Q: Won’t the markets take a dim view of any Labour plan to slow the deficit reduction programme? Balls says Italy’s credit rating was downgraded because its economy was not growing. Growth is vital, he says. Q: But a growth strategy in one country is very limited? That’s right, says Balls. This is the most dangerous moment for the world economy in his lifetime. David Cameron is going to international meetings recommending more cuts. But that is not working. Cameron and Osborne are stuck in a “false consciousness” about the economy. Q: When you were in government, did you ever think you would have to say sorry so clearly? Balls says he was children’s secretary. Q: But according to Alistair Darling you were the shadow chancellor. Balls says that claim was not in Darling’s book, only in a blog purporting to reveal what it would say. He says that he told Gordon Brown that he did not want to be the Alan Walters of the Labour government. (Walters was the economic adviser who triggered Nigel Lawson’s resignation as chancellor because Margaret Thatcher trusted him more than Lawson.) He did not have many disagreements with Darling. When he did disagree with Darling, he told him to his face. The interview ends. Jim Naughtie invites Nick Robinson to comment. Robinson mentions the speech that David Miliband would have given to the Labour conference if he had won the leadership last year. (It was published in the Guardian earlier this year.) In that, Miliband said Labour should never have promised an end to boom and bust. Balls comes in. He says he would have applauded that speech. I’ll summarise the highlights shortly. 8.11am: Ed Balls is being interviewed on the Today programme now. Q: Do you accept that Labour’s reputation for economic competence took a battering when you were in power? Yes, says Balls. That’s why it is important for Labour to be credible. He says people have to believe what Labour says. That’s why he has to be very careful what he says. He cannot promise to reverse every cut or tax rise. But he can show that there is a different economic strategy. Q: You’ve got to stand up and say sorry, haven’t you? Yes, says Balls. I have and I will. He says Labour got banking regulation wrong. Q: You proposed soft-touch regulation. Balls says that wasn’t his phrase. People want Labour to acknowledge the mistake. But most people are forward looking too. Q: People are angry. Balls says: “I feel pretty angry too.” He says he has said sorry for Labour’s failure to regulate the banks properly. Today he will set out a five-point plan for growth. But people need to be able to trust Labour. If they don’t, they won’t listen to the five-point plan. 8.06am: Ed Balls’ speech to the Labour conference will be the highlight today. Last year Balls was accused of doom-mongering when he came close to predicting that Britain would slip into a double-dip recession as a result of George Osborne’s economic policies. A year later, growth is flat and Balls’s warnings are looking prescient. But Labour does not appear to have benefited from this at all. As the figures on the YouGov tracker poll show (see page 8 of the issues 1 document), voters still trust the Conservatives more on the economy than Labour. Labour’s hopes of winning the next election dependent, to a large extent, on turning that around. Balls will be hoping that his speech, and the announcements he’s making, will play a part in this process. Balls has already been giving interviews and he’s about to go on the Today programme. I’ll be covering that in full. As for the rest of the conference, here’s today’s programme. 9.30am: Conference starts • Carwyn Jones , first minister of Wales • Glenis Willmott , leader of the Labour MEPs • Session on Britain in the World, with speeches from Harriet Harman , the shadow international development secretary, Jim Murphy , the shadow defence secretary and Douglas Alexander , the shadow foreign secretary. Murphy is going to offer cut-price Labour party membership to former and serving members of the armed forces and Alexander is going to say that the west, including Britain when Labour was in power, has too often promoted stability instead of democracy abroad . 12pm: Session on prosperity and work, with a speech from Ed Balls , the shadow chancellor. As Patrick Wintour reports in the Guardian today, Balls is going to say that Labour will go into the next election with demanding and independently scrutinised fiscal rules for cutting the deficit . 12.45pm: Break for lunch. 1pm: Douglas Alexander , Liam Byrne , Mary Creagh and Lord Glasman speak at a Guardian fringe on What Labour must do next? 2.15pm: Session on Prosperity and Work, with speeches from John Denham , the shadow business secretary, Maria Eagle , the shadow transport secretary and Liam Byrne , the shadow work and pensions secretary. Denham is going to propose an overhaul of consumer protection rights . • Scottish report, with speeches from Ann McKechin , the shadow Scottish secretary, and Iain Gray , the leader of the Scottish Labour party. As usual, I’ll be covering all the conference news, as well as looking at the papers and bringing you the best comment from the web. I’ll post a lunchtime summary at around 1pm and an afternoon one at about 5pm. My colleague Paul Owen will then take over the blog for the rest of the evening. Labour conference 2011 Ed Balls Labour conference Labour Ed Miliband Economic policy Andrew Sparrow guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …• Ed Balls’ interviews – summary • Harriet Harman’s speech – summary • Jim Murphy’s speech – summary 12.40pm: Balls says David Cameron has described the UK as a safe haven. But it is not a safe haven for the 16,000 companies that have gone out of business this year. Or for people who have lost the education and maintenance allowance. Or for families losing child benefit. Or for young people who are out of work. Or for the millions of families struggling with higher bills. Balls ends saying that Labour must show that there’s a better way. At the end of his speech it’s not clear that he has finished – the peroration is a bit flat – and it takes delegates a while to work out that they are meant to start applauding. 12.38pm: Balls says Labour is determined to tackle short-termism in industry. The party will consider the case for a National Investment Bank for small businesses. • Labour to consider calling for a National Investment Bank for small businesses. 12.37pm: Balls says Whitehall doesn’t always know best. But we know too that government just walking away is not the answer. 12.35pm: Balls says before the election he will spell out “tough fiscal rules” that a future Labour government would have to follow. They would be independently monitored. And he says that any windfall from the sale of shares in the nationalised banks will be used to pay off national debt. 12.34pm: Balls says he does not mind whether this plan is called plan A, plan B or plan C. I don’t care what they call it. Britain just needs a plan that works. 12.31pm: Balls is now describing his five-point growth plan. 1. Repeat the bank bonus tax and use the money on a job creation scheme. 2. Bring forward investment projects. 3. Cut VAT for a temporary period. 4. Announce a one-year cut in VAT to 5% for home improvements. 5. Introduce a one-year national insurance tax break for firms that take on extra workers. (That’s interesting. There has been speculation that George Osborne is going to introduce a national insurance holiday of this kind. Balls may have shot his fox.) 12.25pm: Balls says the government is refusing to change course. But even the IMF are saying that slamming on the brakes too quickly will hit the recovery. An economic policy can only be credible if it works. But Osborne’s is “just not working”. The Lib Dems and the Tories are saying it’s all Labour’s fault. Balls says Labour could spend all it’s time defending its record. But that won’t help people who are struggling to pay the bills now. Other commentators say Labour should admit it spent too much money. Balls says Labour did make some mistakes, like the 75p tax rise for pensioners and abolishing the 10p rate of tax. Labour should have got more employers to train, it should have adopted tougher controls on immigration and it didn’t regulate the banks properly. Balls says Labour did not spend every pound wisely. But he says Labour did not over-spend. • Balls refused to apologise for Labour’s record on spending. “Don’t let anyone tell you that Labour in government was profligate with public money – when we went into the crisis with lower national debt than we inherited in 1997. 12.23pm: Balls says Cameron and Osborne did not cause the global financial crisis. But the question is: have their decisions made things better or worse. Balls says he warned a year ago that, with the economy fragile, it was not the time to “tear out the foundations of the house”. Now confidence has slumped, Balls says. The economy has flatlined and unemployment is going up. 12.21pm: Balls says the world needs a global plan for growth. But, in the EU and America, David Cameron and George Osborne are applauding austerity. This is not just a failure of leadership. It’s an abdication of responsibility too. 12.18pm: Balls praises Labour’s leader in Liverpool and in Wales for showing that Labour policies can work. He turns to the economy. These are the darkest, most dangerous times for the global economy in my lifetime. This is a global problem, he says. It is not a crisis that can be solved “country by country”. The problems are “deepening and darkening by the day”. Austerity does not work, he says. You either learn the lessons of history “or you repeat the mistakes of history”. 12.15pm: Balls says this is his first speech as shadow chancellor. He is the first Labour and Cooperative party MP to be shadow chancellor. And it’s Labour’s first conference in Liverpool since 1925. He pays tribute “to our leader and my friend, Ed Miliband”. He has shown courageous leadership on issues like phone hacking and Libya. In Miliband, Labour has a leader who is genuine, honest, principled and fair. He is a leader in whom Labour can ask the British people to put their trust. • Balls pays lavish tribute to Miliband, saying he is “a leader who speaks his mind and tells the truth”. 12.15pm: Ed Balls is speaking now. 12.11pm: Here’s the gaffe of the day. I didn’t hear Harriet Harman on Woman’s Hour, but James Chapman has posted the quote on Twitter. I hope we will have David, er, Ed, Ed Miliband elected as Prime Minister at the next election. 11.53am: So far the proceedings have been relatively thin this morning. Even Douglas Alexander, (left) the shadow foreign secretary and one of the party’s leading thinkers, did not have a great deal to say in his speech. Here are the main points. The full text is on the Labour website. • Alexander said that in the past Britain and other western countries had been too willing to support dictatorships in the Middle East. Too often in the past, the West has backed stability over democracy in the Middle East. So I’m so proud that this year, this Party, chose to stand with these young people, and against the old autocrats. That choice meant I could stand on the street in Tunis a few months ago and look them in the eye. • He said Britain should now worry more about China than Brussels. This seemed aimed at the Tory Eurosceptics. The real question for the new generation isn’t about the reach of Brussels – it’s about the rise of Beijing. For with power and money moving East, no country has an alternative but to work in partnership with other countries. • He said Britain should forge international alliances. It was important to have a foreign policy that was “realistic about what we can achieve alone, but idealistic about what we can achieve together”, he said. 11.38am: I’ve already mentioned the announcement from Jim Murphy (left) that serving and former members of the armed forces will be allowed to join Labour for £1. (See 11.01am.) Here are some of the other main points in his speech. • Murphy says Labour would always take defence seriously. “We will never wrap ourselves in the cloak of jingoism but the Labour Party will always be strong on defence,” he said. • He attacked the government for reducing military pensions, cutting army numbers and decommissioning aircraft carriers. • He said Labour would set up a Friends of the Forces organisation. It will increase Labour’s engagement with the service community. George Robertson, the former defence secretary and former Nato secretary general, will be a patron. Murphy also said Labour would voluntarily sign up to the military covenant. 11.23am: Aung San Suu Kyi (left), the Burmese opposition leader, has recorded a message for the Labour conference. It has just been shown in the conference hall. In it, she spoke about the importance of democracy. Democracy is the best system that has yet been thought up by man. It is the system that values the individual. It is the system that will help our people to live with self-respect, with freedom. This is why it always gives us the greatest pleasure to feel that we are in contact with democratic forces. It makes us feel at one with others who believe in the same values in which we believe. 11.20am: David Miliband has given an interview to the Journal in which he has played down the prospects of an early return to the shadow cabinet. This is what he said when asked about taking a job on the frontbench. I say the same thing always to everyone, which is that I think I made the right decision last year. I promised I would give Ed the space to lead the party as he sees fit, I wasn’t going to be part of a soap opera. And so I am here to support the party and support the leadership. 11.01am: Jim Murphy , the shadow defence secretary, has just delivered his speech to the conference. As Nick Hopkins wrote in the Guardian today, he announced that Labour would allow members of the armed forces to join the party for £1. He introduced Corporal Stephen Burke, who has become the first person to take advantage of the scheme. In a short speech, Burke said that servicemen and women were “ordinary people” and that they had the same concerns as civilians. Nick first wrote about this scheme in July. When his original story appeared, Ann Black, a member of Labours’ national executive committee, wrote a post on a blog dismissing the idea as a gimmick. A strange story appeared in the Guardian on July 30th claiming that Labour was set to launch an aggressive marketing campaign offering membership at 1p each to several million military veterans, including former national servicemen. This would signal that we are a party of the armed forces, and use their “unique experience and insight” to “shape the party’s culture, policy and campaigns”. This has never been raised with the NEC, and I can find no-one in authority to confirm it, so I think it can be dismissed. This does not deny the courage of those who are sent to fight and the respect in which they are held, regardless of opinions on particular wars. However the veterans’ associations themselves see it as a silly gimmick and would, like everyone else, prefer a decent pension. And many people serve their country in other ways: as unpaid carers, volunteers, and other frontline public servants, large numbers of whom – unlike most veterans – happen to be women. Party membership is still overly white, male and ageing, and initiatives should surely be aimed at increasing diversity. I’ll post some more from Murphy’s speech when I’ve read the text. 10.35am: Harriet Harman ‘s speech is now on the Labour website. Here are the main points. • Harman said multinational companies should pay more tax in Africa. Tax dodging was costing poor countries more than they receive in aid, she claimed. Africa has huge reserves of oil, gold, iron, diamonds. The biggest companies make billions of profit. They must publish what they get in profits from each country and what they pay in taxes to each country. Global companies all say they are committed to transparency – but they are not doing it. No-one can accept the situation where we have to give money to poor countries but those countries – which are rich in natural resources – don’t get their fair share of the profits from their mines. The truth is, more is lost to people in poor countries from tax dodging by global companies than is paid in aid. • She praised Andrew Mitchell, the international development secretary, for resisting pressure for international aid spending to be cut. But while Andrew Mitchell is – to his credit – fighting to live up to our 0.7% promise, most of the Tories are against it – including his fellow cabinet ministers who’re blocking the legislation they promised to put it into law. We mustn’t let aid be just the next Tory broken promise. • But she also claimed the Tories would never take a leading role on other international development issues. They’ll never tackle the unfair trade which sees rich countries get richer and the poor get poorer. They will never tackle the obscene global speculation on food and land that sees profits soar while the poor go hungry. They will never tackle climate change – which hits first and hardest at the poorest countries. That’s what Ed Miliband did when we were in government. We hear nothing of that now. The Tories’ team of men only development ministers will never be able to lead the way internationally in empowering women and girls in the developing world. 10.28am: I arrived at the conference centre well before 8am, which meant that I didn’t have to queue to get through security, but delegates and journalists who tried to get in later have had to wait for ages. One colleague told me he thought some people had been queuing for up to an hour. It seems there aren’t enough security scanners. Sky’s Jon Craig has put a post on Twitter suggesting it might be time to resurrect a famous old poster. Massive queue to get into the Labour conference. Only one entrance. Shambolic! It’s already being dubbed the “Labour isn’t working” queue. 10.21am: Ed Balls hasn’t even delivered his speech yet, but the reaction is rolling in. George Eaton at the Staggers says that committing Labour to new fiscal rules is a masterstroke. Balls’s smart calculation is that these promises will provide him with the political cover necessary to make the case for renewed stimulus, in the form of a temporary cut in VAT and other measures (he has promised to set out a five-point plan for restoring growth in his speech). As Keynes put it: “The boom, not the slump, is the right time for austerity at the Treasury.” And Fraser Nelson at Coffee House is interested in the way Balls is offering a partial apology. Read between the lines of Balls’ speech today, and you can see a man backtracking – and trying to hold on to his job. Even when Balls tells porkies, he does so with imagination and élan . 10.08am: Listening is a theme at this conference. Douglas Alexander , the shadow foreign secretary, told Sky this morning that the public were ready to listen to the party. Now, I’m not saying that people are instantly going to support the Labour Party. But I would say, even if they’re not yet willing to give us their support, my sense at this conference is they’re now willing to give us a hearing because there’s a real anxiety that the Conservatives have got this wrong. But Paul Kenny , the GMB general secretary, said that it was the Labour party that needed to think about listening. This is what he told the Today programme. I wish that when New Labour was in government they’d actually done a bit more listening to people because up through the ranks of party and the people they were warned about the impact of PFI, the long-term impact and the now the chickens are home to roost. On social housing, the pressures that would come, that was ignored, on pensions, so many issues that were clearly very, very important were ignored and we can’t go back to that. I’ve taken the quotes from PoliticsHome. 10.07am: Harriet Harman, the shadow international development secretary (and deputy Labour leader) is speaking now on international aid. I’ll post a summary of the speech when I’ve seen the text. 10.04am: Back in the conference hall, the delegates have just heard from Maryan Qasim, a former minister for women in Somalia. She said the civil war in the country had had a particularly harsh impact on the country’s women. 9.54am: David Blunkett told Today this morning that Ed Miliband had time to make an impression on the voters because Margaret Thatcher (left) was not immediately popular when she was opposition leader. I’ve taken the quote from PoliticsHome. I’m totally realistic. David Cameron and Margaret Thatcher back in the 70s – I’m so old I remember this – actually had a dip when they became leader they were not doing very well for two years. Now, Ed’s got that time to do it. Miliband may have made the comparison himself. Earlier this year the Spectator said Thatcher was “an unlikely new role model” for Miliband. I n a recent interview with Progressonline, he refused to be drawn on this, instead saying that he was not going to compare himself with anyone. 9.43am: The conference has just opened. And they’ve announced the results of the vote on the Refounding Labour proposals. They were approved by 93.92% to 6.08%. Almost all the unions voted in favour. The unions have 50% of the vote and, in that section, there was a 99.52% majority in favour. In the constituency section, 88.83% of members were in favour. Officials also announced the result of the ballot on which topics should be the subject of a contemporary motion debate. There will be debates on health and social care; jobs, growth and employment, phone hacking, public services and housing. 9.30am: More from Ed Balls. Apologies if you’re starting to feel that you’ve had enough. But there’s a lot more to come. • Balls has accused the government of wanting to provoke a strike in November to distract attention from the state of the economy. If George Osborne really wants to sort this out, he should get round the table and have serious discussions with the trade unions. I fear that what he really wants is strikes in the autumn to divert attention away from an economic plan which isn’t working. • He has said that ideally he would always want to lower taxes. This came in an interview in the Independent. My instinct is that you should always try to reduce every tax if you can. But in this parliament, the idea that the priority is going to be cutting the top rate of tax when child benefit is being cut, VAT has gone up, people are seeing their living standards squeezed, I find that very hard to see. 9.15am: If you weren’t up before 7am, you will have missed John Prescott (left) on the Today programme. And you’ll have missed a treat, because he was on top form. Essentially, he was saying that some members of the shadow cabinet should be sacked because they’re useless. The BBC has got a full report. Here are the key quotes. • Prescott said some members of the shadow cabinet should be sacked because they are ineffective. There are some people in there who are undoubtedly not carrying their weight … This is a Tory government that’s doing some outrageous things and we haven’t had many words of protest. Ed, you’re the leader, get a shadow cabinet who’ll do that. • He said Labour should stop apologising for its record. They all seem to accept that the 13 years of Labour was a failure despite the record levels of employment, record of investment in housing, minimum wage, SureStart and all that. I say stop apologising for that, stop complaining and get out campaigning. (Ed Balls wasn’t listening. See 8.29am.) 8.29am: Ed Balls (left) has now given at least three interviews this morning. Here are the highlights. I’ve taken some of the quotes from the Press Association and PoliticsHome. • Balls conceded that Labour’s reputation for economic competence had been damaged. When he was asked if he agreed that Labour’s reputation for economic competence “took a battering” in its last days in power, he replied: “Yes, of course, and it’s a big task to turn that around.” After 1979, it took Labour 18 years to restore its economic credibility. This time Labour had to restore its credibility “in this parliament. He said he did not want to make the mistake Labour made in 1992, when it was not credible on the economy. “We had nothing to say on the economy [from 1990 to 1992],” he said. “In 1992 there was a debate on tax and spend, the shadow budget. The real issue was rising unemployment, no growth. Labour wasn’t in the debate. I will not make that mistake again.” • He denied claims that he was a bully. I tell you, there is nothing more despicable than bullies. They become weak people. I had arguments with Tony Blair and Gordon Brown on some of the big issues in our country. But they weren’t weak people they were strong people and it was my job to have an argument. But bullying? No way – it’s a hideous thing, and the only thing more cowardly is people who say things anonymously to books and think they’re making a contribution to public life. They’re not. • Balls said sorry for Labour’s failure to regulate the banks properly. Asked if he would stand up and say sorry, he replied: “Yes, I have and I will. The banking crisis was a disaster. All around the world banks have behaved irresponsibly, but regulation wasn’t tough enough. We were part of that. I’m sorry for that mistake. I deeply, deeply regret it.” He made a similar comment in the Commons recently. But his apology only covered banking regulation. He did not apologise for spending too much. Balls said that he accepted that Labour, like every government, did not spent every pound of public money well. But he said he did not agree with the Tory claims that Labour spending caused the crisis. • He denied claims that he put pressure on Treasury officials to massage their growth forecasts when Labour was in government. This allegation appears in the updated edition of Anthony Seldon and Guy Lodge’s book about Gordon Brown, Brown at 10, that was featured in the Daily Mail on Saturday. We had Graham Parker, who was head of forecasting at the time and is now at the independent OBR. There is no one who could tell Graham Parker to diddle his forecasts. • Balls said he would today set out a five-point plan for restoring growth in his speech. He did not reveal the full details, but he said it would include cutting VAT and using a tax on bank bonuses to fund a job creation programme. • He said Labour would use any profit from the sale of shares in the nationalised banks to pay off national debt. “If they can make a profit on the sale of bank shares, which are all owned by the public at the moment, you should not, as Nick Clegg and George Osborne say, use that for a giveaway,” he said. “Use the bank shared to repay the national debt – that’s the responsible thing to do.” (When Gordon Brown was chancellor, he did the same when he raised more than £20bn from the sale of mobile phone licences.) • Balls said he did not accept coalition claims that the markets would panic if Britain slowed the pace of its deficit reduction programme. “The markets know that if economies aren’t growing, then you get into a vicious circle and your debt dynamics can actually make a debt unsustainable,” he said. • He said he told Gordon Brown that he would not undermine Alistair Darling when Darling was chancellor. “I said to Gordon Brown at the very beginning I would not be the Alan Walters of the Labour government who came between the prime minister and the chancellor,” Balls said. When Balls did disagree with Darling, which was “very rarely”, he spoke to him about it directly. • Balls said setting up the Office for Budget Responsibility was “the right thing to do.” 8.16am: The interview is still going on. Balls says borrowing is going to be £45bn higher than George Osborne planned because the economy is not growing. He says if the Treasury makes a profit from the sale of bank shares, that should be used to pay off the national debt. Q: What are your five points? Balls says it will involved cutting VAT and using a bank bonus tax to create jobs for young people. (These are established Labour proposals.) He says he does not want to reveal the rest of his speech now. Q: Won’t the markets take a dim view of any Labour plan to slow the deficit reduction programme? Balls says Italy’s credit rating was downgraded because its economy was not growing. Growth is vital, he says. Q: But a growth strategy in one country is very limited? That’s right, says Balls. This is the most dangerous moment for the world economy in his lifetime. David Cameron is going to international meetings recommending more cuts. But that is not working. Cameron and Osborne are stuck in a “false consciousness” about the economy. Q: When you were in government, did you ever think you would have to say sorry so clearly? Balls says he was children’s secretary. Q: But according to Alistair Darling you were the shadow chancellor. Balls says that claim was not in Darling’s book, only in a blog purporting to reveal what it would say. He says that he told Gordon Brown that he did not want to be the Alan Walters of the Labour government. (Walters was the economic adviser who triggered Nigel Lawson’s resignation as chancellor because Margaret Thatcher trusted him more than Lawson.) He did not have many disagreements with Darling. When he did disagree with Darling, he told him to his face. The interview ends. Jim Naughtie invites Nick Robinson to comment. Robinson mentions the speech that David Miliband would have given to the Labour conference if he had won the leadership last year. (It was published in the Guardian earlier this year.) In that, Miliband said Labour should never have promised an end to boom and bust. Balls comes in. He says he would have applauded that speech. I’ll summarise the highlights shortly. 8.11am: Ed Balls is being interviewed on the Today programme now. Q: Do you accept that Labour’s reputation for economic competence took a battering when you were in power? Yes, says Balls. That’s why it is important for Labour to be credible. He says people have to believe what Labour says. That’s why he has to be very careful what he says. He cannot promise to reverse every cut or tax rise. But he can show that there is a different economic strategy. Q: You’ve got to stand up and say sorry, haven’t you? Yes, says Balls. I have and I will. He says Labour got banking regulation wrong. Q: You proposed soft-touch regulation. Balls says that wasn’t his phrase. People want Labour to acknowledge the mistake. But most people are forward looking too. Q: People are angry. Balls says: “I feel pretty angry too.” He says he has said sorry for Labour’s failure to regulate the banks properly. Today he will set out a five-point plan for growth. But people need to be able to trust Labour. If they don’t, they won’t listen to the five-point plan. 8.06am: Ed Balls’ speech to the Labour conference will be the highlight today. Last year Balls was accused of doom-mongering when he came close to predicting that Britain would slip into a double-dip recession as a result of George Osborne’s economic policies. A year later, growth is flat and Balls’s warnings are looking prescient. But Labour does not appear to have benefited from this at all. As the figures on the YouGov tracker poll show (see page 8 of the issues 1 document), voters still trust the Conservatives more on the economy than Labour. Labour’s hopes of winning the next election dependent, to a large extent, on turning that around. Balls will be hoping that his speech, and the announcements he’s making, will play a part in this process. Balls has already been giving interviews and he’s about to go on the Today programme. I’ll be covering that in full. As for the rest of the conference, here’s today’s programme. 9.30am: Conference starts • Carwyn Jones , first minister of Wales • Glenis Willmott , leader of the Labour MEPs • Session on Britain in the World, with speeches from Harriet Harman , the shadow international development secretary, Jim Murphy , the shadow defence secretary and Douglas Alexander , the shadow foreign secretary. Murphy is going to offer cut-price Labour party membership to former and serving members of the armed forces and Alexander is going to say that the west, including Britain when Labour was in power, has too often promoted stability instead of democracy abroad . 12pm: Session on prosperity and work, with a speech from Ed Balls , the shadow chancellor. As Patrick Wintour reports in the Guardian today, Balls is going to say that Labour will go into the next election with demanding and independently scrutinised fiscal rules for cutting the deficit . 12.45pm: Break for lunch. 1pm: Douglas Alexander , Liam Byrne , Mary Creagh and Lord Glasman speak at a Guardian fringe on What Labour must do next? 2.15pm: Session on Prosperity and Work, with speeches from John Denham , the shadow business secretary, Maria Eagle , the shadow transport secretary and Liam Byrne , the shadow work and pensions secretary. Denham is going to propose an overhaul of consumer protection rights . • Scottish report, with speeches from Ann McKechin , the shadow Scottish secretary, and Iain Gray , the leader of the Scottish Labour party. As usual, I’ll be covering all the conference news, as well as looking at the papers and bringing you the best comment from the web. I’ll post a lunchtime summary at around 1pm and an afternoon one at about 5pm. My colleague Paul Owen will then take over the blog for the rest of the evening. Labour conference 2011 Ed Balls Labour conference Labour Ed Miliband Economic policy Andrew Sparrow guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …• Ed Balls’ interviews – summary • Harriet Harman’s speech – summary • Jim Murphy’s speech – summary 12.40pm: Balls says David Cameron has described the UK as a safe haven. But it is not a safe haven for the 16,000 companies that have gone out of business this year. Or for people who have lost the education and maintenance allowance. Or for families losing child benefit. Or for young people who are out of work. Or for the millions of families struggling with higher bills. Balls ends saying that Labour must show that there’s a better way. At the end of his speech it’s not clear that he has finished – the peroration is a bit flat – and it takes delegates a while to work out that they are meant to start applauding. 12.38pm: Balls says Labour is determined to tackle short-termism in industry. The party will consider the case for a National Investment Bank for small businesses. • Labour to consider calling for a National Investment Bank for small businesses. 12.37pm: Balls says Whitehall doesn’t always know best. But we know too that government just walking away is not the answer. 12.35pm: Balls says before the election he will spell out “tough fiscal rules” that a future Labour government would have to follow. They would be independently monitored. And he says that any windfall from the sale of shares in the nationalised banks will be used to pay off national debt. 12.34pm: Balls says he does not mind whether this plan is called plan A, plan B or plan C. I don’t care what they call it. Britain just needs a plan that works. 12.31pm: Balls is now describing his five-point growth plan. 1. Repeat the bank bonus tax and use the money on a job creation scheme. 2. Bring forward investment projects. 3. Cut VAT for a temporary period. 4. Announce a one-year cut in VAT to 5% for home improvements. 5. Introduce a one-year national insurance tax break for firms that take on extra workers. (That’s interesting. There has been speculation that George Osborne is going to introduce a national insurance holiday of this kind. Balls may have shot his fox.) 12.25pm: Balls says the government is refusing to change course. But even the IMF are saying that slamming on the brakes too quickly will hit the recovery. An economic policy can only be credible if it works. But Osborne’s is “just not working”. The Lib Dems and the Tories are saying it’s all Labour’s fault. Balls says Labour could spend all it’s time defending its record. But that won’t help people who are struggling to pay the bills now. Other commentators say Labour should admit it spent too much money. Balls says Labour did make some mistakes, like the 75p tax rise for pensioners and abolishing the 10p rate of tax. Labour should have got more employers to train, it should have adopted tougher controls on immigration and it didn’t regulate the banks properly. Balls says Labour did not spend every pound wisely. But he says Labour did not over-spend. • Balls refused to apologise for Labour’s record on spending. “Don’t let anyone tell you that Labour in government was profligate with public money – when we went into the crisis with lower national debt than we inherited in 1997. 12.23pm: Balls says Cameron and Osborne did not cause the global financial crisis. But the question is: have their decisions made things better or worse. Balls says he warned a year ago that, with the economy fragile, it was not the time to “tear out the foundations of the house”. Now confidence has slumped, Balls says. The economy has flatlined and unemployment is going up. 12.21pm: Balls says the world needs a global plan for growth. But, in the EU and America, David Cameron and George Osborne are applauding austerity. This is not just a failure of leadership. It’s an abdication of responsibility too. 12.18pm: Balls praises Labour’s leader in Liverpool and in Wales for showing that Labour policies can work. He turns to the economy. These are the darkest, most dangerous times for the global economy in my lifetime. This is a global problem, he says. It is not a crisis that can be solved “country by country”. The problems are “deepening and darkening by the day”. Austerity does not work, he says. You either learn the lessons of history “or you repeat the mistakes of history”. 12.15pm: Balls says this is his first speech as shadow chancellor. He is the first Labour and Cooperative party MP to be shadow chancellor. And it’s Labour’s first conference in Liverpool since 1925. He pays tribute “to our leader and my friend, Ed Miliband”. He has shown courageous leadership on issues like phone hacking and Libya. In Miliband, Labour has a leader who is genuine, honest, principled and fair. He is a leader in whom Labour can ask the British people to put their trust. • Balls pays lavish tribute to Miliband, saying he is “a leader who speaks his mind and tells the truth”. 12.15pm: Ed Balls is speaking now. 12.11pm: Here’s the gaffe of the day. I didn’t hear Harriet Harman on Woman’s Hour, but James Chapman has posted the quote on Twitter. I hope we will have David, er, Ed, Ed Miliband elected as Prime Minister at the next election. 11.53am: So far the proceedings have been relatively thin this morning. Even Douglas Alexander, (left) the shadow foreign secretary and one of the party’s leading thinkers, did not have a great deal to say in his speech. Here are the main points. The full text is on the Labour website. • Alexander said that in the past Britain and other western countries had been too willing to support dictatorships in the Middle East. Too often in the past, the West has backed stability over democracy in the Middle East. So I’m so proud that this year, this Party, chose to stand with these young people, and against the old autocrats. That choice meant I could stand on the street in Tunis a few months ago and look them in the eye. • He said Britain should now worry more about China than Brussels. This seemed aimed at the Tory Eurosceptics. The real question for the new generation isn’t about the reach of Brussels – it’s about the rise of Beijing. For with power and money moving East, no country has an alternative but to work in partnership with other countries. • He said Britain should forge international alliances. It was important to have a foreign policy that was “realistic about what we can achieve alone, but idealistic about what we can achieve together”, he said. 11.38am: I’ve already mentioned the announcement from Jim Murphy (left) that serving and former members of the armed forces will be allowed to join Labour for £1. (See 11.01am.) Here are some of the other main points in his speech. • Murphy says Labour would always take defence seriously. “We will never wrap ourselves in the cloak of jingoism but the Labour Party will always be strong on defence,” he said. • He attacked the government for reducing military pensions, cutting army numbers and decommissioning aircraft carriers. • He said Labour would set up a Friends of the Forces organisation. It will increase Labour’s engagement with the service community. George Robertson, the former defence secretary and former Nato secretary general, will be a patron. Murphy also said Labour would voluntarily sign up to the military covenant. 11.23am: Aung San Suu Kyi (left), the Burmese opposition leader, has recorded a message for the Labour conference. It has just been shown in the conference hall. In it, she spoke about the importance of democracy. Democracy is the best system that has yet been thought up by man. It is the system that values the individual. It is the system that will help our people to live with self-respect, with freedom. This is why it always gives us the greatest pleasure to feel that we are in contact with democratic forces. It makes us feel at one with others who believe in the same values in which we believe. 11.20am: David Miliband has given an interview to the Journal in which he has played down the prospects of an early return to the shadow cabinet. This is what he said when asked about taking a job on the frontbench. I say the same thing always to everyone, which is that I think I made the right decision last year. I promised I would give Ed the space to lead the party as he sees fit, I wasn’t going to be part of a soap opera. And so I am here to support the party and support the leadership. 11.01am: Jim Murphy , the shadow defence secretary, has just delivered his speech to the conference. As Nick Hopkins wrote in the Guardian today, he announced that Labour would allow members of the armed forces to join the party for £1. He introduced Corporal Stephen Burke, who has become the first person to take advantage of the scheme. In a short speech, Burke said that servicemen and women were “ordinary people” and that they had the same concerns as civilians. Nick first wrote about this scheme in July. When his original story appeared, Ann Black, a member of Labours’ national executive committee, wrote a post on a blog dismissing the idea as a gimmick. A strange story appeared in the Guardian on July 30th claiming that Labour was set to launch an aggressive marketing campaign offering membership at 1p each to several million military veterans, including former national servicemen. This would signal that we are a party of the armed forces, and use their “unique experience and insight” to “shape the party’s culture, policy and campaigns”. This has never been raised with the NEC, and I can find no-one in authority to confirm it, so I think it can be dismissed. This does not deny the courage of those who are sent to fight and the respect in which they are held, regardless of opinions on particular wars. However the veterans’ associations themselves see it as a silly gimmick and would, like everyone else, prefer a decent pension. And many people serve their country in other ways: as unpaid carers, volunteers, and other frontline public servants, large numbers of whom – unlike most veterans – happen to be women. Party membership is still overly white, male and ageing, and initiatives should surely be aimed at increasing diversity. I’ll post some more from Murphy’s speech when I’ve read the text. 10.35am: Harriet Harman ‘s speech is now on the Labour website. Here are the main points. • Harman said multinational companies should pay more tax in Africa. Tax dodging was costing poor countries more than they receive in aid, she claimed. Africa has huge reserves of oil, gold, iron, diamonds. The biggest companies make billions of profit. They must publish what they get in profits from each country and what they pay in taxes to each country. Global companies all say they are committed to transparency – but they are not doing it. No-one can accept the situation where we have to give money to poor countries but those countries – which are rich in natural resources – don’t get their fair share of the profits from their mines. The truth is, more is lost to people in poor countries from tax dodging by global companies than is paid in aid. • She praised Andrew Mitchell, the international development secretary, for resisting pressure for international aid spending to be cut. But while Andrew Mitchell is – to his credit – fighting to live up to our 0.7% promise, most of the Tories are against it – including his fellow cabinet ministers who’re blocking the legislation they promised to put it into law. We mustn’t let aid be just the next Tory broken promise. • But she also claimed the Tories would never take a leading role on other international development issues. They’ll never tackle the unfair trade which sees rich countries get richer and the poor get poorer. They will never tackle the obscene global speculation on food and land that sees profits soar while the poor go hungry. They will never tackle climate change – which hits first and hardest at the poorest countries. That’s what Ed Miliband did when we were in government. We hear nothing of that now. The Tories’ team of men only development ministers will never be able to lead the way internationally in empowering women and girls in the developing world. 10.28am: I arrived at the conference centre well before 8am, which meant that I didn’t have to queue to get through security, but delegates and journalists who tried to get in later have had to wait for ages. One colleague told me he thought some people had been queuing for up to an hour. It seems there aren’t enough security scanners. Sky’s Jon Craig has put a post on Twitter suggesting it might be time to resurrect a famous old poster. Massive queue to get into the Labour conference. Only one entrance. Shambolic! It’s already being dubbed the “Labour isn’t working” queue. 10.21am: Ed Balls hasn’t even delivered his speech yet, but the reaction is rolling in. George Eaton at the Staggers says that committing Labour to new fiscal rules is a masterstroke. Balls’s smart calculation is that these promises will provide him with the political cover necessary to make the case for renewed stimulus, in the form of a temporary cut in VAT and other measures (he has promised to set out a five-point plan for restoring growth in his speech). As Keynes put it: “The boom, not the slump, is the right time for austerity at the Treasury.” And Fraser Nelson at Coffee House is interested in the way Balls is offering a partial apology. Read between the lines of Balls’ speech today, and you can see a man backtracking – and trying to hold on to his job. Even when Balls tells porkies, he does so with imagination and élan . 10.08am: Listening is a theme at this conference. Douglas Alexander , the shadow foreign secretary, told Sky this morning that the public were ready to listen to the party. Now, I’m not saying that people are instantly going to support the Labour Party. But I would say, even if they’re not yet willing to give us their support, my sense at this conference is they’re now willing to give us a hearing because there’s a real anxiety that the Conservatives have got this wrong. But Paul Kenny , the GMB general secretary, said that it was the Labour party that needed to think about listening. This is what he told the Today programme. I wish that when New Labour was in government they’d actually done a bit more listening to people because up through the ranks of party and the people they were warned about the impact of PFI, the long-term impact and the now the chickens are home to roost. On social housing, the pressures that would come, that was ignored, on pensions, so many issues that were clearly very, very important were ignored and we can’t go back to that. I’ve taken the quotes from PoliticsHome. 10.07am: Harriet Harman, the shadow international development secretary (and deputy Labour leader) is speaking now on international aid. I’ll post a summary of the speech when I’ve seen the text. 10.04am: Back in the conference hall, the delegates have just heard from Maryan Qasim, a former minister for women in Somalia. She said the civil war in the country had had a particularly harsh impact on the country’s women. 9.54am: David Blunkett told Today this morning that Ed Miliband had time to make an impression on the voters because Margaret Thatcher (left) was not immediately popular when she was opposition leader. I’ve taken the quote from PoliticsHome. I’m totally realistic. David Cameron and Margaret Thatcher back in the 70s – I’m so old I remember this – actually had a dip when they became leader they were not doing very well for two years. Now, Ed’s got that time to do it. Miliband may have made the comparison himself. Earlier this year the Spectator said Thatcher was “an unlikely new role model” for Miliband. I n a recent interview with Progressonline, he refused to be drawn on this, instead saying that he was not going to compare himself with anyone. 9.43am: The conference has just opened. And they’ve announced the results of the vote on the Refounding Labour proposals. They were approved by 93.92% to 6.08%. Almost all the unions voted in favour. The unions have 50% of the vote and, in that section, there was a 99.52% majority in favour. In the constituency section, 88.83% of members were in favour. Officials also announced the result of the ballot on which topics should be the subject of a contemporary motion debate. There will be debates on health and social care; jobs, growth and employment, phone hacking, public services and housing. 9.30am: More from Ed Balls. Apologies if you’re starting to feel that you’ve had enough. But there’s a lot more to come. • Balls has accused the government of wanting to provoke a strike in November to distract attention from the state of the economy. If George Osborne really wants to sort this out, he should get round the table and have serious discussions with the trade unions. I fear that what he really wants is strikes in the autumn to divert attention away from an economic plan which isn’t working. • He has said that ideally he would always want to lower taxes. This came in an interview in the Independent. My instinct is that you should always try to reduce every tax if you can. But in this parliament, the idea that the priority is going to be cutting the top rate of tax when child benefit is being cut, VAT has gone up, people are seeing their living standards squeezed, I find that very hard to see. 9.15am: If you weren’t up before 7am, you will have missed John Prescott (left) on the Today programme. And you’ll have missed a treat, because he was on top form. Essentially, he was saying that some members of the shadow cabinet should be sacked because they’re useless. The BBC has got a full report. Here are the key quotes. • Prescott said some members of the shadow cabinet should be sacked because they are ineffective. There are some people in there who are undoubtedly not carrying their weight … This is a Tory government that’s doing some outrageous things and we haven’t had many words of protest. Ed, you’re the leader, get a shadow cabinet who’ll do that. • He said Labour should stop apologising for its record. They all seem to accept that the 13 years of Labour was a failure despite the record levels of employment, record of investment in housing, minimum wage, SureStart and all that. I say stop apologising for that, stop complaining and get out campaigning. (Ed Balls wasn’t listening. See 8.29am.) 8.29am: Ed Balls (left) has now given at least three interviews this morning. Here are the highlights. I’ve taken some of the quotes from the Press Association and PoliticsHome. • Balls conceded that Labour’s reputation for economic competence had been damaged. When he was asked if he agreed that Labour’s reputation for economic competence “took a battering” in its last days in power, he replied: “Yes, of course, and it’s a big task to turn that around.” After 1979, it took Labour 18 years to restore its economic credibility. This time Labour had to restore its credibility “in this parliament. He said he did not want to make the mistake Labour made in 1992, when it was not credible on the economy. “We had nothing to say on the economy [from 1990 to 1992],” he said. “In 1992 there was a debate on tax and spend, the shadow budget. The real issue was rising unemployment, no growth. Labour wasn’t in the debate. I will not make that mistake again.” • He denied claims that he was a bully. I tell you, there is nothing more despicable than bullies. They become weak people. I had arguments with Tony Blair and Gordon Brown on some of the big issues in our country. But they weren’t weak people they were strong people and it was my job to have an argument. But bullying? No way – it’s a hideous thing, and the only thing more cowardly is people who say things anonymously to books and think they’re making a contribution to public life. They’re not. • Balls said sorry for Labour’s failure to regulate the banks properly. Asked if he would stand up and say sorry, he replied: “Yes, I have and I will. The banking crisis was a disaster. All around the world banks have behaved irresponsibly, but regulation wasn’t tough enough. We were part of that. I’m sorry for that mistake. I deeply, deeply regret it.” He made a similar comment in the Commons recently. But his apology only covered banking regulation. He did not apologise for spending too much. Balls said that he accepted that Labour, like every government, did not spent every pound of public money well. But he said he did not agree with the Tory claims that Labour spending caused the crisis. • He denied claims that he put pressure on Treasury officials to massage their growth forecasts when Labour was in government. This allegation appears in the updated edition of Anthony Seldon and Guy Lodge’s book about Gordon Brown, Brown at 10, that was featured in the Daily Mail on Saturday. We had Graham Parker, who was head of forecasting at the time and is now at the independent OBR. There is no one who could tell Graham Parker to diddle his forecasts. • Balls said he would today set out a five-point plan for restoring growth in his speech. He did not reveal the full details, but he said it would include cutting VAT and using a tax on bank bonuses to fund a job creation programme. • He said Labour would use any profit from the sale of shares in the nationalised banks to pay off national debt. “If they can make a profit on the sale of bank shares, which are all owned by the public at the moment, you should not, as Nick Clegg and George Osborne say, use that for a giveaway,” he said. “Use the bank shared to repay the national debt – that’s the responsible thing to do.” (When Gordon Brown was chancellor, he did the same when he raised more than £20bn from the sale of mobile phone licences.) • Balls said he did not accept coalition claims that the markets would panic if Britain slowed the pace of its deficit reduction programme. “The markets know that if economies aren’t growing, then you get into a vicious circle and your debt dynamics can actually make a debt unsustainable,” he said. • He said he told Gordon Brown that he would not undermine Alistair Darling when Darling was chancellor. “I said to Gordon Brown at the very beginning I would not be the Alan Walters of the Labour government who came between the prime minister and the chancellor,” Balls said. When Balls did disagree with Darling, which was “very rarely”, he spoke to him about it directly. • Balls said setting up the Office for Budget Responsibility was “the right thing to do.” 8.16am: The interview is still going on. Balls says borrowing is going to be £45bn higher than George Osborne planned because the economy is not growing. He says if the Treasury makes a profit from the sale of bank shares, that should be used to pay off the national debt. Q: What are your five points? Balls says it will involved cutting VAT and using a bank bonus tax to create jobs for young people. (These are established Labour proposals.) He says he does not want to reveal the rest of his speech now. Q: Won’t the markets take a dim view of any Labour plan to slow the deficit reduction programme? Balls says Italy’s credit rating was downgraded because its economy was not growing. Growth is vital, he says. Q: But a growth strategy in one country is very limited? That’s right, says Balls. This is the most dangerous moment for the world economy in his lifetime. David Cameron is going to international meetings recommending more cuts. But that is not working. Cameron and Osborne are stuck in a “false consciousness” about the economy. Q: When you were in government, did you ever think you would have to say sorry so clearly? Balls says he was children’s secretary. Q: But according to Alistair Darling you were the shadow chancellor. Balls says that claim was not in Darling’s book, only in a blog purporting to reveal what it would say. He says that he told Gordon Brown that he did not want to be the Alan Walters of the Labour government. (Walters was the economic adviser who triggered Nigel Lawson’s resignation as chancellor because Margaret Thatcher trusted him more than Lawson.) He did not have many disagreements with Darling. When he did disagree with Darling, he told him to his face. The interview ends. Jim Naughtie invites Nick Robinson to comment. Robinson mentions the speech that David Miliband would have given to the Labour conference if he had won the leadership last year. (It was published in the Guardian earlier this year.) In that, Miliband said Labour should never have promised an end to boom and bust. Balls comes in. He says he would have applauded that speech. I’ll summarise the highlights shortly. 8.11am: Ed Balls is being interviewed on the Today programme now. Q: Do you accept that Labour’s reputation for economic competence took a battering when you were in power? Yes, says Balls. That’s why it is important for Labour to be credible. He says people have to believe what Labour says. That’s why he has to be very careful what he says. He cannot promise to reverse every cut or tax rise. But he can show that there is a different economic strategy. Q: You’ve got to stand up and say sorry, haven’t you? Yes, says Balls. I have and I will. He says Labour got banking regulation wrong. Q: You proposed soft-touch regulation. Balls says that wasn’t his phrase. People want Labour to acknowledge the mistake. But most people are forward looking too. Q: People are angry. Balls says: “I feel pretty angry too.” He says he has said sorry for Labour’s failure to regulate the banks properly. Today he will set out a five-point plan for growth. But people need to be able to trust Labour. If they don’t, they won’t listen to the five-point plan. 8.06am: Ed Balls’ speech to the Labour conference will be the highlight today. Last year Balls was accused of doom-mongering when he came close to predicting that Britain would slip into a double-dip recession as a result of George Osborne’s economic policies. A year later, growth is flat and Balls’s warnings are looking prescient. But Labour does not appear to have benefited from this at all. As the figures on the YouGov tracker poll show (see page 8 of the issues 1 document), voters still trust the Conservatives more on the economy than Labour. Labour’s hopes of winning the next election dependent, to a large extent, on turning that around. Balls will be hoping that his speech, and the announcements he’s making, will play a part in this process. Balls has already been giving interviews and he’s about to go on the Today programme. I’ll be covering that in full. As for the rest of the conference, here’s today’s programme. 9.30am: Conference starts • Carwyn Jones , first minister of Wales • Glenis Willmott , leader of the Labour MEPs • Session on Britain in the World, with speeches from Harriet Harman , the shadow international development secretary, Jim Murphy , the shadow defence secretary and Douglas Alexander , the shadow foreign secretary. Murphy is going to offer cut-price Labour party membership to former and serving members of the armed forces and Alexander is going to say that the west, including Britain when Labour was in power, has too often promoted stability instead of democracy abroad . 12pm: Session on prosperity and work, with a speech from Ed Balls , the shadow chancellor. As Patrick Wintour reports in the Guardian today, Balls is going to say that Labour will go into the next election with demanding and independently scrutinised fiscal rules for cutting the deficit . 12.45pm: Break for lunch. 1pm: Douglas Alexander , Liam Byrne , Mary Creagh and Lord Glasman speak at a Guardian fringe on What Labour must do next? 2.15pm: Session on Prosperity and Work, with speeches from John Denham , the shadow business secretary, Maria Eagle , the shadow transport secretary and Liam Byrne , the shadow work and pensions secretary. Denham is going to propose an overhaul of consumer protection rights . • Scottish report, with speeches from Ann McKechin , the shadow Scottish secretary, and Iain Gray , the leader of the Scottish Labour party. As usual, I’ll be covering all the conference news, as well as looking at the papers and bringing you the best comment from the web. I’ll post a lunchtime summary at around 1pm and an afternoon one at about 5pm. My colleague Paul Owen will then take over the blog for the rest of the evening. Labour conference 2011 Ed Balls Labour conference Labour Ed Miliband Economic policy Andrew Sparrow guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Research into education, safety, property and amenities names Winkleigh as best place in England and Wales to raise children A historic farming village between Dartmoor and Exmoor has been named the best place in England and Wales to bring up children. Research by Calnea Analytics for savings company Family Investments looked at 60 factors including crime statistics, property prices and proximity to Green Flag parks in 2,400 postcodes. These were grouped into five categories – education, safety, property, population and amenities – and each was given a score up to a maximum of 25. The results were published in the Family Friendly Hotspots 2011 report . Top of the table was Winkleigh in Devon, postcode EX19, which scored 19.76 thanks to a combination of low crime figures, excellent key stage 2 results at local primary schools, and facilities including a community centre, village hall and sports centre. The affordability of property in the area also pushed the village up the rankings. While the average price of a two-bed home in Winkleigh is a not exactly cheap at £150,837, the average salary of those who live there is £37,566, making property more affordable than in some areas of the country. Jane Rivans, headteacher at Winkleigh primary school, said: “It is very exciting to have Winkleigh highlighted in this way. “It is a lovely village with friendly people and we are fortunate at school to have enthusiastic children, supportive parents and a dedicated staff.” Lisa Garnsworthy, 33, an assistant optician who lives in the village with her husband Jason, 34, a car mechanic, and their two daughters Jasmine, nine, and Kara, seven, said the “great community spirit” made it a “happy, relaxed and safe” place to bring up children. “Everyone always says ‘hello’ and it’s never too much trouble to stop and chat,” she said. “Young and old always look out for each other and the local businesses, pre-school and primary school engage with each other giving an all round huge support network.” Second on the list was postcode TA13 – South Petherton in Somerset. Like Winkleigh, this did well because of good school results and low crime rates. But property there is less affordable, with the average two-bedroom property costing £158,823, and a lower average salary of £25,489. The rest of the top 20 locations includes a mix of villages and towns with a good geographical spread. Family Investments’ chief executive John Reeve said he hoped families would find the data helpful when considering their next move. However, he acknowledged that the tables could not tell the whole story. “Of course, one of the most important factors for families, and one of the most difficult to measure, is the vital support network of extended family and friends, particularly when children are young,” he said. “We know that the factors we’ve been able to examine must be looked at alongside these hugely important, but less measurable benefits, like being close to grandparents, for example.” Top 20 family friendly postcodes 1. Winkleigh, Devon, EX19 2. South Petherton, Somerset, TA13 3. Galgate, Lancashire, LA2 4. Eaglescliffe, Stockton-on-Tees, TS16 5. Bromley Cross, Bolton, BL7 6. Shebbear, Devon, EX21 7. Great Ayton, North Yorkshire, TS9 8. Sutton Coldfield, West Midlands, B74 9. Moor Row, Cumbria, CA24 10. Bromyard, Herefordshire, HR7 11. Groby, Leicestershire, LE6 12. Ilkley, West Yorkshire, LS29 13. Chellaston, Derby, DE73 14. Dunnington, North Yorkshire, YO19 15. Horncastle, Lincolnshire, LN9 16. Ramsbottom, Manchester, BL0 17. Wirral, Merseyside, CH60 18. Borth, Dyfed, Wales, SY24 19. Longridge, Lancashire, PR3 20. Sutton, London, SM2 If you want to see the statistics for your postcode, click here . Consumer affairs Family finances Family Hilary Osborne guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Two men arrested after items believed to have been taken in raids on stately homes discovered in caravan and garage Detectives have found more than £5m worth of antiques stolen from stately homes in a tatty caravan and neighbouring lock-up garage in a quiet Yorkshire village. Two men have been arrested for questioning over the haul which is thought to be part of a long-term and sophisticated targeting of mansions over the past five years. Items recovered from Tankersley, near Sheffield, include treasures taken in two thefts which attracted international publicity in 2009. A Chippendale table was taken from Newby Hall, near Ripon, for which it was specially made, and porcelain worth £1.3m went in a daring raid on Firle Place in Sussex. A member of the National Trust, 58-year-old George Harkin from Wakefield, was jailed for nine years in March for the Firle theft . Detectives said after the case that he had refused to co-operate over the whereabouts of the stolen goods, but by then a major investigation was well underway. All three Yorkshire forces and the regional organised crime unit worked with specialised roads crime officers to track suspected gang members to where the goods might be stashed. Inquiries led them to a nondescript store in Tankersley, a village probably best known for the crumbling fortified farm which featured in Ken Loach’s 1969 film Kes. Officers who broke into the lock-up and caravan found the George III rosewood table from Newby, a house which influenced the plot of the TV drama Downton Abbey. Antiques experts at the time of the theft described the piece by the UK’s best-known furniture-maker as having “worldwide importance”. Stored beside the Chippendale table was the Firle haul: a pair of Louis XVI ormolu and Sèvres bleu vases, with an insurance value of £950,000, a Meissen statue from the 1740s, The Indiscreet Harlequin, and a Sèvres Hollandois Nouveau vase from 1761, valued at £180,000 each. Nine other items recovered include an embellished bracket clock made by Daniel Delander of London around 1710 which was stolen from Sion Hill Hall in Northallerton, north Yorkshire, shortly before the two other thefts. Police also raided addresses in Tankersley and the Leeds suburb of Middleton. They are currently questioning a 68-year-old man from the former and a 44-year-old man from the later. The inquiry includes possible links to the illegal drugs trade. Detective Superintendent Steve Waite, head of regional intelligence for Yorkshire and the Humber, said: “We are so pleased and proud to have recovered these high-value antiques which have been described as true pieces of British heritage. We will now begin the formal process of identification and will eventually be in a position to reunite the pieces with their owners. “Only a couple of items have suffered minor damage in the ordeal but this just goes to show that those involved in the thefts were not in it for their love of antiques. In fact, recent trends indicate that these types of high-value items are actually being used by organised crime groups as currency or collateral in relation to serious criminality, often involving drugs.” Other items which form part of the operation’s continuing search include porcelain from 21 country house thefts since 2007. They include a Meissen teapot and bronze bust worth a total of £40,000 stolen in 2009 from Sutton Park near York, the home of the David Cameron’s in-laws, Sir Reginald and Lady Sheffield. There have been 15 similar attempted robberies which showed extensive knowledge of mansions and their security systems but failed. Crime Martin Wainwright guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Officials in the UK Border Agency warned home secretary not to deport Palestinian activist as case was ‘very finely balanced’ The home secretary, Theresa May, was warned by senior officials in the UK Border Agency not to deport a Palestinian activist accused of antisemitism, saying the evidence against him was disputed, open to legal challenge and that the case was “very finely balanced”. Sheikh Raed Salah, leader of the Northern branch of the Islamic Movement, who has been in Britain, in prison and on bail since his arrest three months ago, will appeal against his deportation before an immigration and asylum tribunal on Monday. Emails seen by the Guardian, show that May was determined to find a reason to exclude Salah, before the evidence against him had been verified. Just 17 minutes after receiving a report on the activist, prepared by Michael Whine of the Community Security Trust, a UK charity monitoring antisemitism, Faye Johnson, private secretary to the home secretary emailed about a parliamentary event Salah was due to attend: “Is there anything that we can do to prevent him from attending (eg could we exclude him on the grounds of unacceptable behaviour?)” she wrote. Whine’s report said Salah’s record of provocative statements carried a risk that his presence in the UK could have “a radicalising impact” on his audiences. Border Agency officials were dubious. Jon Rosenom-Lanng of the Special Cases Directorate (SCD) wrote to the home secretary on 21 June, saying that while there was evidence that would allow her to exclude Salah on the grounds of unacceptable behaviour, “the disputed underlying evidence could make an exclusion decision vulnerable to legal challenge”. He concluded: “We assess that this case is very finely balanced.” After the home secretary signed the order, a second official of the SCD, Andy Smith restated the Border Authority’s objections. He said the action would prolong Salah’s stay in the UK, raise his profile and give him a credibility he did not currently have. He warned of the cost of the case on their budget, “as it is not a case that would not have been undertaken if the SCD advice had been followed”. Tayab Ali, Saleh’s solicitor said: “When the secretary of state makes a decision to exclude someone from the UK, it is imperative the correct policy is followed. The home secretary made a decision and then searched for reasons to justify it. Its not for the home secretary to determine who should speak in parliament. This is an attack on parliamentary democracy.” Saleh’s legal team say the quotes he is alleged to have said and written were doctored to make them sound antisemitic. The Home Office presented four allegations of antisemitism against him, all drawn from the Israeli press: that Salah wrote a poem in which he described Jews as “criminal bombers of mosques, slaughterers of pregnant women and babies, robbers and germ in all time”; that he promoted martyrdom; that he invoked a blood libel invocation by saying that “blood had been mixed in the dough of Holy Bread” and that he referenced a fake document the Protocols of the Elders of Zion in saying that a third temple would be build on the ruins of the al-Aqsa mosque in Jerusalem. Salah’s lawyers say the poem was made up and the views expressed in it were abhorrent to Salah. A second version of the same poem has since been presented but with the admission that a reference to Jews was inserted. In other alleged quotes, words were interjected to change their meaning. In the blood libel accusation, the word Jewish was interjected, when the original referred to the murder of Christian and Muslim children during the Spanish Inquisition and a part of the speech in which Salah said defended the right of Jewish worship in synagogues deleted. On the allegation that he promoted suicide bombing by referring to martyrdom, he had been referring to incidents of Palestinian worshipers being martyred or killed at prayer by the Israeli security forces. The doctored quotes have been repeated by the Israeli Press, pro-Israeli websites, two British newspapers and the CST. No checks have been conducted, until now, on their veracity. Salah has served two terms of imprisonment in Israel, two years for funding proscribed charities and five months for spitting at a police officer during protests in 2007. He has not been convicted of incitement (although a case has been re-opened after the events in London) and the Islamic movement remains a legal organisation. An Islamic Movement spokesman said: “The Israeli establishment knows what the sheikh has said and they know they have no legal case against him. They have not been shy of pursuing him on other charges.” Salah was elected mayor of his town Umm al-Falm an Israeli-Arab city bordering the green line, three times. As a Palestinian with Israeli citizenship, he came to prominence for his defence of the Muslim holy sites and his participation on the Mavi Marmara, the Turkish boat that was stormed last year by Israeli navy as it attempted to break the siege of Gaza. Salah’s battle against deportation from Britain has prompted support from mainstream secular Palestinians. The prime minister in the West Bank, Salam Fayyad, said the Salah’s detention would harm the Palestinian Authority. Fatah, Dr Hanan Ashrawi, the Supreme Follow-up Committee of the Arab Community in Israel, the Palestinian National Assembly, Israeli Arab MPs Haneen Zoabi and Ahmed Tibi, and Talab al-Sana have all issued statements of support. Theresa May Palestinian territories Immigration and asylum David Hearst guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Officials in the UK Border Agency warned home secretary not to deport Palestinian activist as case was ‘very finely balanced’ The home secretary, Theresa May, was warned by senior officials in the UK Border Agency not to deport a Palestinian activist accused of antisemitism, saying the evidence against him was disputed, open to legal challenge and that the case was “very finely balanced”. Sheikh Raed Salah, leader of the Northern branch of the Islamic Movement, who has been in Britain, in prison and on bail since his arrest three months ago, will appeal against his deportation before an immigration and asylum tribunal on Monday. Emails seen by the Guardian, show that May was determined to find a reason to exclude Salah, before the evidence against him had been verified. Just 17 minutes after receiving a report on the activist, prepared by Michael Whine of the Community Security Trust, a UK charity monitoring antisemitism, Faye Johnson, private secretary to the home secretary emailed about a parliamentary event Salah was due to attend: “Is there anything that we can do to prevent him from attending (eg could we exclude him on the grounds of unacceptable behaviour?)” she wrote. Whine’s report said Salah’s record of provocative statements carried a risk that his presence in the UK could have “a radicalising impact” on his audiences. Border Agency officials were dubious. Jon Rosenom-Lanng of the Special Cases Directorate (SCD) wrote to the home secretary on 21 June, saying that while there was evidence that would allow her to exclude Salah on the grounds of unacceptable behaviour, “the disputed underlying evidence could make an exclusion decision vulnerable to legal challenge”. He concluded: “We assess that this case is very finely balanced.” After the home secretary signed the order, a second official of the SCD, Andy Smith restated the Border Authority’s objections. He said the action would prolong Salah’s stay in the UK, raise his profile and give him a credibility he did not currently have. He warned of the cost of the case on their budget, “as it is not a case that would not have been undertaken if the SCD advice had been followed”. Tayab Ali, Saleh’s solicitor said: “When the secretary of state makes a decision to exclude someone from the UK, it is imperative the correct policy is followed. The home secretary made a decision and then searched for reasons to justify it. Its not for the home secretary to determine who should speak in parliament. This is an attack on parliamentary democracy.” Saleh’s legal team say the quotes he is alleged to have said and written were doctored to make them sound antisemitic. The Home Office presented four allegations of antisemitism against him, all drawn from the Israeli press: that Salah wrote a poem in which he described Jews as “criminal bombers of mosques, slaughterers of pregnant women and babies, robbers and germ in all time”; that he promoted martyrdom; that he invoked a blood libel invocation by saying that “blood had been mixed in the dough of Holy Bread” and that he referenced a fake document the Protocols of the Elders of Zion in saying that a third temple would be build on the ruins of the al-Aqsa mosque in Jerusalem. Salah’s lawyers say the poem was made up and the views expressed in it were abhorrent to Salah. A second version of the same poem has since been presented but with the admission that a reference to Jews was inserted. In other alleged quotes, words were interjected to change their meaning. In the blood libel accusation, the word Jewish was interjected, when the original referred to the murder of Christian and Muslim children during the Spanish Inquisition and a part of the speech in which Salah said defended the right of Jewish worship in synagogues deleted. On the allegation that he promoted suicide bombing by referring to martyrdom, he had been referring to incidents of Palestinian worshipers being martyred or killed at prayer by the Israeli security forces. The doctored quotes have been repeated by the Israeli Press, pro-Israeli websites, two British newspapers and the CST. No checks have been conducted, until now, on their veracity. Salah has served two terms of imprisonment in Israel, two years for funding proscribed charities and five months for spitting at a police officer during protests in 2007. He has not been convicted of incitement (although a case has been re-opened after the events in London) and the Islamic movement remains a legal organisation. An Islamic Movement spokesman said: “The Israeli establishment knows what the sheikh has said and they know they have no legal case against him. They have not been shy of pursuing him on other charges.” Salah was elected mayor of his town Umm al-Falm an Israeli-Arab city bordering the green line, three times. As a Palestinian with Israeli citizenship, he came to prominence for his defence of the Muslim holy sites and his participation on the Mavi Marmara, the Turkish boat that was stormed last year by Israeli navy as it attempted to break the siege of Gaza. Salah’s battle against deportation from Britain has prompted support from mainstream secular Palestinians. The prime minister in the West Bank, Salam Fayyad, said the Salah’s detention would harm the Palestinian Authority. Fatah, Dr Hanan Ashrawi, the Supreme Follow-up Committee of the Arab Community in Israel, the Palestinian National Assembly, Israeli Arab MPs Haneen Zoabi and Ahmed Tibi, and Talab al-Sana have all issued statements of support. Theresa May Palestinian territories Immigration and asylum David Hearst guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …President Nicolas Sarkozy’s conservative party loses its majority in upper house for the first time in more than 50 years France’s left wrested the Senate from the right in indirect elections on Sunday, taking the majority of seats in the upper house of parliament for the first time in more than 50 years – a blow to conservative president Nicolas Sarkozy. Seven months before presidential elections, Sarkozy’s party downplayed what it said was a narrow win – up to three seats, according to officials from the president’s party. The minister for parliamentary relations, Patrick Ollier, said the results had “no national political significance”. Final results of the voting to fill half the seats in the 348-seat house were not in, but the Socialist party leader in the Senate announced the victory. “This is a day that will mark history,” Jean-Pierre Bel, head of the Senate’s Socialist party, said. The Senate president has a consequential role under the French constitution – as interim leader should the nation’s president become incapacitated. The upper house, a 17th-century palace at the foot of the Luxembourg gardens in Paris, is sometimes derided as an institution that specialises in handing out rubber stamps. Nevertheless it can initiate bills and slow down their passage. The right had controlled the Senate since the start of the Fifth Republic in 1958. “For the first time, change is in motion … This is a real affront to the right,” Bel said. He estimated the left had won 24 to 26 new seats. It needed 23 seats to gain a majority. Final results were not expected immediately. The result is a further blow to the profile of the already unpopular Sarkozy, providing the Socialist party with prestige and political capital. Senate president Gérard Larcher, of Sarkozy’s party, conceded the left “made a real push … larger than I thought” – but said he would seek to renew his mandate. Leading members of Sarkozy’s Union for a Popular Movement party, known as UMP, stressed the forthcoming vote on 1 October for the president of the chamber. Socialists attributed their success to discontent in France’s towns and rural heartland, the home bases of the 71,890 delegates – regionally and locally elected officials who cast ballots to fill the 170 seats. Senators who were elected on Sunday have six-year mandates. Jean-François Copé, head of Sarkozy’s UMP, said the election results were “a disappointment but not a surprise”. “In no way is it a disavowal of the politics of the government,” he said. In the presidential elections, the “totality of voters” will take part – not delegates voting to fill half a chamber, he said. The Socialist party entered the elections confidently after a string of leftist victories in regional and local elections since 2008. The party elections chief, Christophe Borgel, said local officials “have the feeling of being held in scorn”. A 2010 territorial reform will put several thousand regional and general councillors out of jobs. Some of these officials have complained government funds were not keeping up with increased responsibilities handed over to regions in a 2004 reform. François Hollande, a favourite among several Socialist party members seeking the party’s presidential candidacy, said a leftist Senate majority would serve a Socialist party president well because it would be the first time the party could work with a leftist majority in the Senate. Sarkozy will not be the first president to preside over the nation with opponents in control of at least one house of parliament. Socialist president François Mitterrand dealt for each of his 14 years in office with his political rivals in the Senate and was forced to cohabit during part of his mandate with a conservative prime minister, Jacques Chirac, who succeeded him as president. France Europe Nicolas Sarkozy guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …