Home » Archives by category » News » World News (Page 215)
Torture charity calls on UK to halt deportation flight to Sri Lanka

Tamils at risk of being detained and tortured as result of UK Border Agency action, claims Freedom from Torture Britain is being urged to halt plans to deport a planeload of Tamils to Sri Lanka on Wednesday amid fears they will be at risk of being detained and tortured on arrival. Up to 50 failed asylum seekers are due to be forcibly removed from the country aboard an aircraft chartered by the UK Border Agency. The plan has alarmed a number of NGOs, including a medical charity that treats victims of torture, which fears the British government cannot be sure that those deported will be safe in Sri Lanka. Freedom from Torture, formerly known as the Medical Foundation for the Care of Victims of Torture, said it received 199 referrals for clinical assistance for Sri Lankans last year and a similar number this year. It said it had clinical evidence that a number of these people have been tortured in Sri Lanka since the end of the civil war in May 2009, some after being returned to the country. The NGOs are warning there is credible evidence that torture is still taking place and anyone suspected of being linked to the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), or Tamil Tigers, is particularly at risk. Human Rights Watch, the New York-based NGO, said the British government “needed to be extremely careful” about returning any Tamils to Sri Lanka. Brad Adams, the organisation’s Asia director, said: “The Sri Lankan government continues to show shocking disregard for the due process rights of anyone deemed linked to the Tamil Tigers. Those detained have been tortured and ‘disappeared’.” Amnesty International said it had documented evidence that failed asylum seekers had suffered torture in Sri Lanka after being removed from Australia. In an account given to Freedom from Torture, one said: “They tortured me by removing my clothes and hitting me with burning irons. They kept me for two days and my body was all swollen. They showed me photographs of LTTE members, including my brother’s picture, and asked me what he was doing now.” Keith Best, the chief executive of Freedom from Torture, has written to Damian Green, the Home Office immigration minister asking whether any arrangements are in place to ensure the safety of people removed to Sri Lanka. He said: “I know you will be mindful of the repercussions for the reputation of the UK if those who are returned then face torture.” The UK Border Agency deported 555 people to Sri Lanka last year, 235 of them failed asylum seekers. Three months ago, Human Rights Watch warned Theresa May, the home secretary, that a group of 26 people facing deportation on a single flight were “at significant risk of persecution” in Sri Lanka. That deportation went ahead, with the government saying the Border Agency was “not aware of any difficulties” that those individuals may have subsequently faced. An agency spokesperson said: “We only undertake returns to Sri Lanka when we are satisfied the individual has no international protection needs. The European court of human rights has ruled that not all Tamil asylum seekers require protection.” But the agency would not say what arrangements, if any, the British government had in place to monitor the treatment of those who were returned. The agency also declined to identify the airport from which the plane is due to depart on Wednesday afternoon. The Sri Lankan government and the Tamil Tigers were both accused of committing war crimes towards the end of the civil war. A US diplomatic cable leaked to WikiLeaks showed that American diplomats believed the Sri Lankan president, Mahinda Rajapaksa, bore responsibility for many of the alleged crimes. The US ambassador in Colombo, Patricia Butenis, wrote that one of the reasons there was such little progress towards a genuine Sri Lankan inquiry was that Rajapaksa and his former army commander, Sarath Fonseka, were largely responsible, and that “there are no examples we know of a regime undertaking wholesale investigations of its own troops or senior officials for war crimes while that regime or government remained in power”. Sri Lanka Immigration and asylum Torture Human rights Ian Cobain guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

Nancy Grace’s breasts have already gotten her quite a bit of attention since Dancing With the Stars premiered ( Gawker ’s headline last week: “Nancy Grace’s Giant Boobs Make Dancing with the Stars Debut”), but last night they stole the show … when one popped out of her dress. The…

Continue reading …
Dalai Lama visit blocked by South Africa to please China, says opposition

Government denies being put under pressure to stop Tibetan spiritual leader attending Desmond Tutu’s 80th birthday The South African government is considering blocking the Dalai Lama from attending the 80th birthday of fellow Nobel peace laureate Desmond Tutu so as not to offend China, according to opposition politicians. Tutu has invited the Tibetan spiritual leader to give a lecture as part of his birthday celebrations in Cape Town on 8 October. Officials from the former archbishop’s office started the visa application process in June, but have yet to get approval for the Dalai Lama’s visit and fear it may not come. The Dalai Lama was refused entry to South Africa in 2009, a move that conflicted with the country’s progressive human rights policies and was widely criticised at home. “We’ve sent letters, following up on a daily basis with phone calls and still are in a situation where there is no response and it’s getting us much more anxious,” said Nomfundo Wazala, chief executive of the Desmond Tutu Peace Centre. “We have been patient, but we really feel at this point in time we deserve an answer.” South African officials have denied dragging their heels. The Dalai Lama, 76, fled Tibet in 1959 during a failed uprising against China and lives in exile in India. Revered by his followers as the 14th reincarnation of the Buddha Avalokiteshvara, he is reviled by the Chinese government as a separatist. Beijing repeatedly warns the leaders of other nations against meeting him. The Dalai Lama stepped down from political life earlier this year and is not due to meet any senior South African government officials during his eight-day trip. As part of Tutu’s birthday celebrations from 6 to 8 October, he is due to deliver a speech titled: “Peace and compassion as catalyst for change”. The Dalai Lama visited South Africa in 1996, meeting the then president, Nelson Mandela, but he was prevented from attending a Nobel laureates’ conference in South Africa two years ago when the government said his visit would distract from preparations for the 2010 World Cup. At the time, Tutu called the decision “disgraceful” and accused the authorities of bowing to pressure from China, South Africa’s biggest trade partner. South Africa’s main opposition party, the Democratic Alliance, said on Tuesday that “our own history and values”, rather than Chinese sensitivities, should be the determining factor when considering the Dalai Lama’s application. South Africa is a member of Brics, the international organisation of leading emerging market countries, along with Brazil, Russia, India and China. “As a Brics partner with the Chinese, we must view our relationship with them as equals, not subordinates,” said Stevens Mokgalapa, the Democratic Alliance party’s deputy spokesman on international relations and co-operation. “We call on the government to show our foreign policy is ‘made in South Africa’, not ‘made in China’.” At a daily press briefing in Beijing, Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Hong Lei would not reveal whether there had been talks with South Africa over the visa, but said that “China’s position of opposing the Dalai Lama visiting any country with ties to China is clear and consistent”.The Chinese government reacted angrily this month when the Dalai Lama met the Mexican president, Felipe Calderón, saying it had “harmed Chinese-Mexican relations”. Beijing was also critical of US president Barack Obama after he received the Tibetan spiritual leader at the White House in July. South Africa’s foreign affairs department denied there had been any pressure from China, and said a complete visa application had only been received on 20 September. This was denied by the Dalai Lama’s representatives, as well as Tutu’s peace centre, which said three letters to the South African government, as well as a personal plea from Tutu to senior officials, had not yielded any results. In a statement, Tutu’s office said the delay in approving the visa was a “major stumbling block” for the organisers of the birthday celebrations. Besides delivering the inaugural Desmond Tutu International Peace Lecture, the Dalai Lama is also due to deliver a speech at Stellenbosch University and to receive the Mahatma Gandhi award for reconciliation and peace from the Mahatma Gandhi Trust in Durban. South Africa’s newspapers were critical of the delay to welcoming the Dalai Lama to the country. In an editorial last week, the Cape Times said “the government’s squeamishness has nothing to do with him [the Dalai Lama] and everything to do with not wanting to annoy China, the new economic powerhouse and a potential source of growth for South Africa’s flagging economy.” Dalai Lama South Africa Africa China Xan Rice guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Ed Miliband: Labour needs to learn ‘hard lessons’

Labour leader tells conference party cannot count on Tory failure in order to win back power Ed Miliband has warned Labour that it will have to learn “hard lessons” about its past mistakes and accept that it will have to work hard to win back the trust of the British people. In a stern message designed to show there is no complacency about the party’s prospects in his tight-knit circle, Miliband told the Labour conference it could not count on Tory failure in order to win back power. “My message to the public is this: we know waiting for the Tories to fail won’t win us back your trust,” he said in an echo of the mantra of Tory modernisers a decade ago. “And we won’t deserve your trust if that’s what we do.” Miliband reinforced his message by saying Labour would have to embark on an ambitious overhaul of its thinking if it is to respond to a “quiet crisis” in which the “hard-working majority” are being failed by society. Citing the summer riots, the phone-hacking scandal and the banking crisis, the Labour leader spoke of “a something for nothing culture” in which people can “take what you can”. He added: “These are just the noisy scandals, which grab the front pages. But, you know, there’s a quiet crisis which doesn’t get the headlines. “It’s about the people who don’t make a fuss, who don’t hack phones, loot shops, fiddle their expenses or earn telephone number salaries at the banks. It’s the grafters, the hard-working majority who do the right thing. It’s a crisis which is happening in your town, your street and maybe even in your home.” Miliband underlined the scale of the ambitions Labour must embrace when he said the crisis dates back 30 years, indicating that it embraces the eras of Margaret Thatcher, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown. “These crises point to something deep in our country – the failure of a system,” he said. “A way of doing things. An old set of rules. An economy and a society too often rewarding not the right people with the right values, but the wrong people with the wrong values. “So the task of leadership in this generation is no ordinary task. It is to chart a new course. And strike a new bargain in our country.” But Miliband made it clear that he was not planning to turn the clock back to the era before the crises, when he said that Labour had been wrong to oppose some of the main tenets of Thatcherism. “Now there are hard lessons here for my party, which some won’t like,” he added. “Some of what happened in the 1980s was right. It was right to let people buy their council houses. It was right to cut tax rates of 60, 70, 80%. “And it was right to change the rules on the closed shop, on strikes before ballots. These changes were right, and we were wrong to oppose it at the time. But while some of it was right, too much of what happened was based on the wrong values.” Miliband said New Labour had been right to moderate Thatcherism by rebuilding the public realm. But he said that New Labour, too, had embraced the wrong values. “We changed the fabric of our country, but we did not do enough to change the values of our economy,” he said. “You believe rewards should be for hard work. But you’ve been told we have to tolerate the wealthiest taking what they can. And what’s happened? Your living standards have been squeezed by runaway rewards at the top.” This approach had led to a “fast buck” economy in which vested interests are able to rip off consumers without being challenged, he said. “In our economy, you’ve been told the fast buck is OK. And what’s happened? We’ve ended up with a financial crisis and you’ve ended up footing the bill,” he said. “You believe in a society where everybody is responsible for their actions. But you’ve been told that if companies are big enough or powerful enough they can get away with anything. And what’s happened? Big vested interests like the energy companies have gone unchallenged, while you’re being ripped off.” While the main thrust of Miliband’s speech was designed to outline a vision for the long term, he did not miss the opportunity to criticise the Tories’ handling of the economy, criticising George Osborne for threatening economic growth by raising taxes and cutting spending more dramatically than in any other country. With slow economic growth raising questions about the chancellor’s plans to eliminate the structural deficit across the course of this parliament, Miliband attempted to portray Labour as the party that is most serious about stabilising the public finances. “The next Labour government will still face tough decisions,” he said. “We won’t be able to reverse many of the cuts this government is making. “And let me tell you, if this government fails to deal with the deficit in this parliament, we are determined to do so. It’s why we will set new fiscal rules to bind government to a disciplined approach. And it’s right, as a down payment, to tell you that we would use every penny of the sale of bank shares to pay down the debt.” Miliband, who acknowledges that his first speech as the Labour leader last year was overshadowed by the “soap opera” of his leadership battle with his brother, attempted to laugh off the family feud. He joked that his sons, Daniel and Sam, are “a new generation of Miliband brothers”. He said: “I know what you’re thinking. But just to reassure you. We’re really hoping they become doctors.” But he used his family history – his late father, Ralph, escaped from Nazi-occupied Belgium and his mother, Marion, was sheltered from the Nazis in Poland – to make a serious point about his values and mission. “My parents fled the Nazis and came to Britain,” he said. “They embraced its values. Outsiders, who built a life for us. “So this is who I am. The heritage of the outsider. The vantage point of the insider. The guy who is determined to break the closed circles of Britain.” Ed Miliband Labour conference 2011 Labour Labour conference Nicholas Watt guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

Facebook Starts a PAC

No Comment

Looks like the original social network is shopping for a political network: Facebook has filed paperwork to form a political action committee and it plans to use it to funnel donations to its favored candidates in upcoming elections, reports the New York Times . As debates about privacy and monopoly concerns…

Continue reading …
Plan to rank A-level students comes under fire

Exam board suggested awarding bonus points to students from low-performing schools who achieve top grades Politicians and universities have condemned a proposal to rank every A-level student in the country and award bonus points to those from low-performing schools who achieve top grades. Britain’s biggest exam board, the Assessment and Qualifications Alliance (AQA), is floating the idea at the party conferences, arguing that it would help universities identify bright pupils from disadvantaged backgrounds. Neil Stringer, author of the proposal and a senior research associate at the exam board’s Centre for Education Research and Policy, suggests students should be awarded an exam score based on their three best A-level grades, then put into different performance bands. Those who attend weak schools, but perform highly would be awarded extra points, while those who perform well at top public schools would have points subtracted. All pupils would then be ranked based on their final scores. The proposal, contained in a discussion paper, has elicited strong criticism within education circles and from all sides of the political spectrum. Nick Gibb, the schools minister, said the main way to guarantee universities took a wider range of students was to improve schools and ensure that “more young people achieve good grades in the right subjects – regardless of background”. He said the proposal risked confusing employers, teachers and pupils by giving different values to the same A-levels and warned that it would undermine the integrity of exams. Andy Burnham, Labour’s shadow education secretary, said rather than adopt AQA’s idea, schools should do “a little more to raise aspiration”, and universities that interview candidates should consider the culture of an interview process which “often replicates the atmosphere of private schools.” The Russell Group, which represents Oxford, Cambridge and eight other leading universities, described the exam board’s proposal as “crude and highly unlikely to help widen access”. Wendy Piatt, director general of the Russell Group, said admissions tutors already considered students’ academic achievements within a broader context: “Our universities often use personal statements, references, additional tests and interviews, as well as taking into account any particular barriers – such as spending time in care – that candidates have faced.” She said that AQA’s overly simplistic ranking system was at odds with this holistic approach. “No single measure of educational context could fairly rank all applicants, and we would warn against such crude approaches. Social and economic disadvantage are complex problems that are difficult to measure reliably, especially at the level of individual applicants.” Million+ , which represents universities formed after 1992, said many of its institutions had already developed systems that took into account applicants’ backgrounds, thereby enabling them to identify talented students from less advantaged homes. Professor Malcolm Gillies, vice-chancellor of London Metropolitan University, said the proposals failed because it was the “individual students” who were admitted to university and who gained the grades, not the schools. “If there is any hint that grades are socially moderated in any way their value will be diminished,” he said. “Universities need to see the naked grades.” Toni Pearce, the National Union of Students’ vice-president for further education said that the proposal amounted to “merely a sticking plaster”. “We should not lose sight of the overriding need to improve educational standards across the board,” she said. Stringer told the Independent that he had been influenced by St George’s medical school, which is part of the University of London. It gives a lower offer to students whose performance is at least 60% better than the average for their school. “This strongly suggests that students admitted through the adjusted-criteria scheme learned enough at A-level and are able-enough learners to compete successfully with students who achieved higher A-level grades under more favourable circumstances,” he said. This summer , universities had to set out how they would widen their pool of students if they want to charge more than £6,000 a year from next year. Every institution was forced to adopt an “access agreement” approved by the Office for Fair Access watchdog. The access agreements will be reviewed each year, with institutions that fail to meet their agreed targets on recruitment and retention facing fines or losing the right to charge more than £6,000. A-levels Higher education Schools Andy Burnham Jessica Shepherd Jeevan Vasagar guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Plan to rank A-level students comes under fire

Exam board suggested awarding bonus points to students from low-performing schools who achieve top grades Politicians and universities have condemned a proposal to rank every A-level student in the country and award bonus points to those from low-performing schools who achieve top grades. Britain’s biggest exam board, the Assessment and Qualifications Alliance (AQA), is floating the idea at the party conferences, arguing that it would help universities identify bright pupils from disadvantaged backgrounds. Neil Stringer, author of the proposal and a senior research associate at the exam board’s Centre for Education Research and Policy, suggests students should be awarded an exam score based on their three best A-level grades, then put into different performance bands. Those who attend weak schools, but perform highly would be awarded extra points, while those who perform well at top public schools would have points subtracted. All pupils would then be ranked based on their final scores. The proposal, contained in a discussion paper, has elicited strong criticism within education circles and from all sides of the political spectrum. Nick Gibb, the schools minister, said the main way to guarantee universities took a wider range of students was to improve schools and ensure that “more young people achieve good grades in the right subjects – regardless of background”. He said the proposal risked confusing employers, teachers and pupils by giving different values to the same A-levels and warned that it would undermine the integrity of exams. Andy Burnham, Labour’s shadow education secretary, said rather than adopt AQA’s idea, schools should do “a little more to raise aspiration”, and universities that interview candidates should consider the culture of an interview process which “often replicates the atmosphere of private schools.” The Russell Group, which represents Oxford, Cambridge and eight other leading universities, described the exam board’s proposal as “crude and highly unlikely to help widen access”. Wendy Piatt, director general of the Russell Group, said admissions tutors already considered students’ academic achievements within a broader context: “Our universities often use personal statements, references, additional tests and interviews, as well as taking into account any particular barriers – such as spending time in care – that candidates have faced.” She said that AQA’s overly simplistic ranking system was at odds with this holistic approach. “No single measure of educational context could fairly rank all applicants, and we would warn against such crude approaches. Social and economic disadvantage are complex problems that are difficult to measure reliably, especially at the level of individual applicants.” Million+ , which represents universities formed after 1992, said many of its institutions had already developed systems that took into account applicants’ backgrounds, thereby enabling them to identify talented students from less advantaged homes. Professor Malcolm Gillies, vice-chancellor of London Metropolitan University, said the proposals failed because it was the “individual students” who were admitted to university and who gained the grades, not the schools. “If there is any hint that grades are socially moderated in any way their value will be diminished,” he said. “Universities need to see the naked grades.” Toni Pearce, the National Union of Students’ vice-president for further education said that the proposal amounted to “merely a sticking plaster”. “We should not lose sight of the overriding need to improve educational standards across the board,” she said. Stringer told the Independent that he had been influenced by St George’s medical school, which is part of the University of London. It gives a lower offer to students whose performance is at least 60% better than the average for their school. “This strongly suggests that students admitted through the adjusted-criteria scheme learned enough at A-level and are able-enough learners to compete successfully with students who achieved higher A-level grades under more favourable circumstances,” he said. This summer , universities had to set out how they would widen their pool of students if they want to charge more than £6,000 a year from next year. Every institution was forced to adopt an “access agreement” approved by the Office for Fair Access watchdog. The access agreements will be reviewed each year, with institutions that fail to meet their agreed targets on recruitment and retention facing fines or losing the right to charge more than £6,000. A-levels Higher education Schools Andy Burnham Jessica Shepherd Jeevan Vasagar guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Plan to rank A-level students comes under fire

Exam board suggested awarding bonus points to students from low-performing schools who achieve top grades Politicians and universities have condemned a proposal to rank every A-level student in the country and award bonus points to those from low-performing schools who achieve top grades. Britain’s biggest exam board, the Assessment and Qualifications Alliance (AQA), is floating the idea at the party conferences, arguing that it would help universities identify bright pupils from disadvantaged backgrounds. Neil Stringer, author of the proposal and a senior research associate at the exam board’s Centre for Education Research and Policy, suggests students should be awarded an exam score based on their three best A-level grades, then put into different performance bands. Those who attend weak schools, but perform highly would be awarded extra points, while those who perform well at top public schools would have points subtracted. All pupils would then be ranked based on their final scores. The proposal, contained in a discussion paper, has elicited strong criticism within education circles and from all sides of the political spectrum. Nick Gibb, the schools minister, said the main way to guarantee universities took a wider range of students was to improve schools and ensure that “more young people achieve good grades in the right subjects – regardless of background”. He said the proposal risked confusing employers, teachers and pupils by giving different values to the same A-levels and warned that it would undermine the integrity of exams. Andy Burnham, Labour’s shadow education secretary, said rather than adopt AQA’s idea, schools should do “a little more to raise aspiration”, and universities that interview candidates should consider the culture of an interview process which “often replicates the atmosphere of private schools.” The Russell Group, which represents Oxford, Cambridge and eight other leading universities, described the exam board’s proposal as “crude and highly unlikely to help widen access”. Wendy Piatt, director general of the Russell Group, said admissions tutors already considered students’ academic achievements within a broader context: “Our universities often use personal statements, references, additional tests and interviews, as well as taking into account any particular barriers – such as spending time in care – that candidates have faced.” She said that AQA’s overly simplistic ranking system was at odds with this holistic approach. “No single measure of educational context could fairly rank all applicants, and we would warn against such crude approaches. Social and economic disadvantage are complex problems that are difficult to measure reliably, especially at the level of individual applicants.” Million+ , which represents universities formed after 1992, said many of its institutions had already developed systems that took into account applicants’ backgrounds, thereby enabling them to identify talented students from less advantaged homes. Professor Malcolm Gillies, vice-chancellor of London Metropolitan University, said the proposals failed because it was the “individual students” who were admitted to university and who gained the grades, not the schools. “If there is any hint that grades are socially moderated in any way their value will be diminished,” he said. “Universities need to see the naked grades.” Toni Pearce, the National Union of Students’ vice-president for further education said that the proposal amounted to “merely a sticking plaster”. “We should not lose sight of the overriding need to improve educational standards across the board,” she said. Stringer told the Independent that he had been influenced by St George’s medical school, which is part of the University of London. It gives a lower offer to students whose performance is at least 60% better than the average for their school. “This strongly suggests that students admitted through the adjusted-criteria scheme learned enough at A-level and are able-enough learners to compete successfully with students who achieved higher A-level grades under more favourable circumstances,” he said. This summer , universities had to set out how they would widen their pool of students if they want to charge more than £6,000 a year from next year. Every institution was forced to adopt an “access agreement” approved by the Office for Fair Access watchdog. The access agreements will be reviewed each year, with institutions that fail to meet their agreed targets on recruitment and retention facing fines or losing the right to charge more than £6,000. A-levels Higher education Schools Andy Burnham Jessica Shepherd Jeevan Vasagar guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Met police boss to bring in senior recruits from outside force

Bernard Hogan-Howe keen to fast-track ‘lateral’ entry in bid to widen diversity of police The new commissioner of the Metropolitan police wants to increase diversity in the force by bringing in senior recruits from outside the service. Bernard Hogan-Howe, who officially took control of the Met this week, believes the police must be more representative of the population – and one way to fast-track that, particularly in more senior ranks, was to look outside the police for talent. “I wouldn’t take every superintendent from outside next year, but I might take 20% if they have got the right skills and we gave them the right training,” he said. “That training is not available yet, so it needs some planning for but I am open-minded.” The commissioner, who said he knew that he could “radically cut crime”, said that in other professions there were higher proportions of individuals from ethnic minorities in senior positions and the police service had to improve its diversity. Currently the only way to join the police service is as a constable, although talented individuals and those with degrees are often promoted quickly through the ranks. Allowing the service to bring people from outside policing into senior ranks – so-called “lateral” entry – is opposed by the Police Federation and the Police Superintendents Association. But the policy has been cited by police minister, Nick Herbert, as a way to increase diversity quickly within the service. Nationally about 220 senior officers make up the leaders of the 43 forces in England and Wales. Only 38 are women and three are from ethnic minorities. The proportion of black and ethnic minority officers across the Met stands at about 10%. Hogan-Howe said that among police staff and community support officers, the proportion of people from ethnic minorities was much greater – about one in three. “We need to be more representative of the people of London,” he said. “There is clearly a lot more to do. Lateral entry is something we need to move on to and encourage. “We either wait 20 years for something to grow from within the organisation or we take an opportunity to get a pool of talent who will encourage us to improve, to get new skills and new ideas that will benefit us in the long run.” He acknowledged that his strategy of “total policing” would focus in part on tapping into the intelligence held in local communities about those individuals who were, for example, carrying knives. That was made easier if communities saw in police officers people from the same background as themselves. The issue is one David Lammy, the MP for Tottenham, has raised with the mayor of London and the home secretary as vital to tackle if the Met is to continue policing by consent in the capital. Police Bernard Hogan-Howe Sandra Laville guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Met police boss to bring in senior recruits from outside force

Bernard Hogan-Howe keen to fast-track ‘lateral’ entry in bid to widen diversity of police The new commissioner of the Metropolitan police wants to increase diversity in the force by bringing in senior recruits from outside the service. Bernard Hogan-Howe, who officially took control of the Met this week, believes the police must be more representative of the population – and one way to fast-track that, particularly in more senior ranks, was to look outside the police for talent. “I wouldn’t take every superintendent from outside next year, but I might take 20% if they have got the right skills and we gave them the right training,” he said. “That training is not available yet, so it needs some planning for but I am open-minded.” The commissioner, who said he knew that he could “radically cut crime”, said that in other professions there were higher proportions of individuals from ethnic minorities in senior positions and the police service had to improve its diversity. Currently the only way to join the police service is as a constable, although talented individuals and those with degrees are often promoted quickly through the ranks. Allowing the service to bring people from outside policing into senior ranks – so-called “lateral” entry – is opposed by the Police Federation and the Police Superintendents Association. But the policy has been cited by police minister, Nick Herbert, as a way to increase diversity quickly within the service. Nationally about 220 senior officers make up the leaders of the 43 forces in England and Wales. Only 38 are women and three are from ethnic minorities. The proportion of black and ethnic minority officers across the Met stands at about 10%. Hogan-Howe said that among police staff and community support officers, the proportion of people from ethnic minorities was much greater – about one in three. “We need to be more representative of the people of London,” he said. “There is clearly a lot more to do. Lateral entry is something we need to move on to and encourage. “We either wait 20 years for something to grow from within the organisation or we take an opportunity to get a pool of talent who will encourage us to improve, to get new skills and new ideas that will benefit us in the long run.” He acknowledged that his strategy of “total policing” would focus in part on tapping into the intelligence held in local communities about those individuals who were, for example, carrying knives. That was made easier if communities saw in police officers people from the same background as themselves. The issue is one David Lammy, the MP for Tottenham, has raised with the mayor of London and the home secretary as vital to tackle if the Met is to continue policing by consent in the capital. Police Bernard Hogan-Howe Sandra Laville guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …