At the Chapel of Russia’s Resurrection, in a village 250 miles east of Moscow, the parishioners pray to a most unusual patron saint—Vladimir Putin, who they consider a reincarnation of St. Paul, reports Der Spiegel . The church was founded by a woman who calls herself “Mother Fotina” and claims…
Continue reading …Elizabeth Warren is within striking distance of Scott Brown, even though many voters have never heard of her, according to a new Boston Herald/UMass Lowell poll . While Brown came out ahead 41% to 38% in the poll, that’s essentially a tie given the poll’s 3.8% margin of error. And…
Continue reading …Experts including 40 directors of public health say government’s health and social care bill will cause ‘irreparable harm’ More than 260 senior doctors and public health experts are calling on the House of Lords to throw out the government’s health and social care bill, saying it will do “irreparable harm to the NHS, to individual patients and to society as a whole”. The signatories include Professor Sir Michael Marmot, the author of several reports on the links between wealth and health that suggest children born into poverty are penalised for life. Marmot has until now not been openly critical of the coalition’s approach, and instead has offered encouragement for David Cameron and Andrew Lansley’s apparent enthusiasm for public health. But Marmot and others in senior positions have now concluded the bill will damage all aspects of the health service. “While we welcome the emphasis placed on establishing a closer working relationship between public health and local government, the proposed reforms as a whole will disrupt, fragment and weaken the country’s public health capabilities,” says the letter. “The government claims that the reforms have the backing of the health professions. They do not. Neither do they have the general support of the public.” The letter details the harms the experts believe the health reform bill will do. “It ushers in a significantly heightened degree of commercialisation and marketisation that will lead to the harmful fragmentation of patient care; aggravate risks to individual patient safety; erode medical ethics and trust within the healthcare system; widen health inequalities; waste much money on attempts to regulate and manage competition; and undermine the ability of the health system to respond effectively and efficiently to communicate disease outbreaks and other public health emergencies,” the letter says. In their judgment, the signatories say, the bill “will erode the NHS’s ethical and co-operative foundations” and “will not deliver efficiency, quality, fairness or choice”. The signatories include around 40 directors of public health from around the country who have taken the difficult decision to go public with their concerns. There are also two senior members of the Faculty of Public Health, one of whom, Dr John Middleton, is a vice-president. Other well-known names include Professor John Ashton, director of public health in Cumbria, and Professor Michel Coleman from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. Dr David McCoy, consultant in public health medicine at the Inner North West London primary care trust, one of the organisers of the letter, said he was surprised at the number of people prepared to sign. “I think if we had continued to collect signatures, I’m quite sure we would have collected another 200 It is having a snowball effect,” he said. “I think the feeling is incredibly strong.” There was a lot of debate about whether we should call for outright rejection or amendments, but there is a feeling the whole package of reforms is harmful and we need to express our position in the strongest terms. I think there was a feeling the forthcoming reading in the House of Lords is the last chance of minimising the harm and damage.” The public health community has not spoken out in this way before. “I think there has been an attempt to work with the reforms and work behind the scenes to optimise the proposed reforms,” said Dr McCoy. Dr Middleton said there was no great opposition to the planned move to place public health services such as smoking cessation within local authorities. “But the letter is a recognition from the public health community that the reforms proposed around the NHS are deeply damaging to the public health in themselves,” he said. There was concern that they would lead to inequalities in healthcare and less access for the poorest and most deprived to the services they need. “The experience of other countries that have ‘liberated’ their health systems has resulted in very poor health services for their communities. I’m thinking of Russia and China where a free market in health resulted in major falls in life expectancy and systems that had provided some safety net cover have failed,” he said. Commenting on the letter, published in the Daily Telegraph on the eve of health secretary Andrew Lansley’s address to the Tory party conference, shadow health secretary John Healey said: “David Cameron is in denial, both about the damage his plans are doing to the NHS and the strength of opposition to his health bill. “There is no mandate for the bill, either from the election or the coalition agreement. With the government having railroaded its plans through the Commons, heavy responsibility is now going to be shouldered by the Lords.” NHS Health policy Health Doctors Public services policy House of Lords Sarah Boseley guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …A Mexico-size chunk of the Pacific will soon be a haven for sharks—and they have a tiny island nation to thank. The Marshall Islands’ government is declaring its waters off-limits to commercial shark fishing and the trade of shark products, the BBC reports, providing the creatures with 750,000…
Continue reading …An openly lesbian PM, affordable childcare and a formidable women’s movement – Iceland may just be a feminist paradise On a wet day in Reykjavik, the rain battering the fishing boats, the tourist shops and the young male artists with their improbable moustaches, Iceland’s minister of industry, energy and tourism is explaining to me that the country needs to be “more badass” about the gender pay gap. The minister is Katrin Juliusdottir , a warm, attractive woman in her mid-30s, pregnant with twins. As she speaks, a hint of frustration enters her voice. Icelandic legislation supposedly guarantees equal pay for equal work, as in the UK ,
Continue reading …Nearly 2,000 teachers responded to a Guardian Teacher Network survey asking how they feel about their jobs. Many wrote: ‘I love teaching but…’ Disrespected, often bullied, fed up with governments that don’t trust them and despairing of the decline in parenting skills, you’d think teachers would be scouring the jobs columns for other careers, but, according to the Guardian Teacher Network survey published today, the reason they aren’t in larger numbers is because so many of them still love teaching. If there is a single message that sings out loud and clear, it is a plea from teachers to be treated as professionals, rather than infantilised by short-termist governments and political philosophies. Teachers who have come from other professions wonder openly about the lack of trust in their professionalism. One former solicitor, now questioning the sense of the career switch, said: “There is a profound lack of respect by senior staff and parents for the quality of work and quantity of work undertaken by teachers. “I have never before worked in a place where I have not been treated as a professional. My every move is monitored. I am not trusted to do the job I have trained and gained qualifications to do. It has had a great impact on my confidence to do the job. As a solicitor I was trusted to do my job once I had the qualifications and experience, why is this not the case in teaching?” Nearly 2,000 teachers – most of them members of the growing Guardian Teacher Network – filled in the survey during late August and September. There was a free text box at the end for extra comments and it was here that teachers, like that former solicitor, poured out eloquent testimony of what it feels like to be a teacher in the UK today. In the first five hours after the survey went live, 600 forms were returned, many with very detailed comments. Time and time again, they began: “I love teaching but …” or “This is the best job in the world but …” And they were big buts – government targets and interference, senior managers who bullied colleagues to achieve those targets, Michael Gove and Conservative party policy, league tables, Ofsted, bureaucracy, unsupportive parents, declining parenting skills, deteriorating student behaviour, disappearing pensions and lack of respect. There are relatively few references to wanting more money for the long hours teachers work – a third cited working weeks in excess of 50 hours – more often there is a straightforward recognition that they have a vocation to teach and they came into teaching because of that drive. The despairing voices are there – those who can’t wait to retire (“Three years to go and counting…”) and those who yearn to get away (“I am an NQT. I’m already looking forward to a way out”) – but they are not the loudest. Most simply feel frustrated that they are not trusted to do their job. Cary Cooper, professor of organisational psychology at Lancaster University, who has done major studies on workplace stress, is not surprised by the findings. “Global evidence is clear – lack of control and autonomy in your job makes you ill. It is stressful to be in an occupation where you feel you have people looking over your shoulder and where you can be named and shamed. All those characteristics were there in teaching 10 years ago, but it is worse now because jobs in the public sector are no longer secure. “Teachers want autonomy and respect – the people who go into it have a real vocation; they don’t do it for the money.We should train all our headteachers in engaging their staff in the decisions that affect their jobs, and the government needs to stop dictating top-down to teachers and instead discuss ideas with teachers. It should then undertake systematic pilots of ideas, which are evaluated. It needs to start treating teachers as professionals.” So, to some of the key statistics. Around 85% of respondents felt teachers had less respect from society in the UK than in some other countries. Just over half of the sample had considered leaving teaching and of these, 62% quote excessive government interference in schools as the reason; 50% blamed student behaviour; 44% workload or exhaustion; 30% parent behaviour; 25% lack of career prospects and just 22% had considered leaving for a job where they could earn more money. A massive 90% complained of teacher bullying – nearly two-thirds cited bullying from senior management, just over half cited parents as the aggressors, 40% students and 35% colleagues. Around 60% of the teachers said that student behaviour had become worse during their teaching career, with teachers outside London more likely to say it. And the theories offered for the decline in student behaviour? Teachers point a sharp finger at the shape of British society. 81% blamed a decline in the nuclear family and 75% the growing influence of dubious and negative role models for young people. Just under half felt parents had become less supportive of teachers during their time in the profession, with teachers in the south-west of England and in Scotland most likely to say it. Asked why they felt they had less parental support, 79% of this part of the sample pointed at declining parenting skills; 65% said parents’ perceived value of education had diminished; 59% said that long hours at work had affected the time parents spent with their children. A picture of some senior management as unsure of their rights, or not wanting to get into trouble, also emerged, with 68% blaming worsening student behaviour on lack of support in imposing discipline from senior staff. But care for their students shines through, with appeals for more vocational opportunities and concerns that some students are put on courses that will meet school targets rather than their individual needs. Only 10% in the survey wanted to see GCSEs abolished, but 65% wanted to see an end to Sats. Just 22% thought their career prospects were good. Only 14% wanted to be headteachers (“Many are very reluctant to aspire to headteacher posts because too much is now expected”) and 44% had considered teaching abroad. A DfE spokesman said: “We’re making teachers’ lives easier and stopping breathing down their necks – by slashing bureaucracy and thousands of pages of statutory guidance; we’re giving them greater freedom over the curriculum; and transforming the quality of career development training. Good schools know best – not politicians or bureaucrats.” Casestudy Daniel Hartley has been teaching for three years. He studied for his PGCE in secondary history at the University of Exeter and is head of history and religious studies at Chulmleigh community college in Devon “There is so much that frustrates many teachers. It feels as if we face a constant tide of change, forced on us from above.New governments always feel they have to put their own stamp on education – for me this means that while we wait for the new curriculum to come out in 2014, I am wary even of spending cash on text books – there is no certainty. Everything seems to change at a rate of about 200mph so it is a constant struggle to keep up with new initiatives, which are often just regurgitated old ones with a sexy new name. My school is pretty good so I don’t suffer with many of the problems that I know other teachers do. What I find annoying is that the government and others don’t take into account the hours of paperwork, the re-jigging of schemes of work, professional development sessions and effort that go into reacting to these changes … that then suddenly are made worthless by a white paper. It can be totally exhausting. I also find alarming the focus on league tables and targets. For my GCSE students we use a computer program to predict grades. This takes no account of social problems the students might face and so can often spit out a grade that might not be achievable. For example, if you have a student who just doesn’t turn up, you still have to give him/her a grade and when they don’t achieve that, the quality of your teaching is scrutinised. It is tough on them, too, to be given expectations they can’t meet. You still can’t help but look at your targets sometimes after the exams and question if you still have the ability to teach. That constant feeling that you have to defend yourself can be demoralising. Teachers can feel totally undervalued and even bullied when targets aren’t met. I feel we’re missing a trick. Surely if we support colleagues rather than berate them, and focus on delivering engaging lessons, we will have a much happier staff whose love of what they do will rub off on the pupils. I feel sad that many teachers are now, more than ever before, expected to be social workers, parents and teachers all rolled into one as there is a lack of parental support. Children are hoofed into schools and we have to do the groundwork of teaching them manners and how to behave properly. Surely the school should just be one link in the chain? Parents, teachers and society at large all have a role to play in producing rounded, responsible members of society.” • For more details or to join the Guardian Teacher Network, see http://teachers.guardian.co.uk/ Wendy Berliner is head of the Guardian Teacher Network Teaching Teachers’ workload Education policy Schools Wendy Berliner guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Laws cracking down on illegal immigrants in Alabama and other states have dominated the news over the past year–but three states have more quietly passed laws or changed rules to allow illegal immigrants brought to the country as minors to go to college at in-state rates. Rhode Island’s higher education body, the Board of Governors
Continue reading …Winner of the Nobel prize for medicine had passed away but rules state that award cannot be given posthumously The Nobel prize season began under a cloud when it emerged that one of the winners of the freshly minted medicine award had passed away days before. The world’s most prestigious prizes honour scientists and other leading figures for exceptional contributions to their fields, but the prize rules state that they cannot be awarded posthumously. Following an emergency meeting of officials at the Nobel assembly, it was decided that, in this instance, the rules could be ignored. The Nobel foundation concluded that the award should stand, saying: “The Nobel prize to Ralph Steinman was made in good faith, based on the assumption that the Nobel laureate was alive.” This year’s prize for medicine was given to three biologists whose work on the immune system opened up new avenues in the fight against infections and diseases. American Bruce Beutler, 53, and French biologist Jules Hoffmann, 70, share half of the 10 million Swedish kronor (£934,000) prize money, with the remainder earmarked for the 68-year-old Canadian-born Steinman. But when the Nobel committee tried to contact Dr Steinman, a researcher at Rockefeller University in New York, they heard he had died from pancreatic cancer on Friday. Steinman had been treating himself with a therapy based on his own research into the body’s immune system, but died after a four-year battle with the disease. Göran Hansson, secretary general of the Nobel committee, told the Guardian: “We never inform the winners in advance. I couldn’t get through to Dr Steinman for obvious reasons, so I sent an email that was picked up by his daughter, who contacted the president of Rockefeller University. He then contacted us with the news.” Since 1974, a Nobel prize could only be awarded posthumously if the recipient died between the award being announced and the traditional ceremony in December. The Nobel assembly regularly takes decades to recognise achievements worthy of the prize, and many winners are retired by the time they receive the honour. But Hansson said this appeared to be the first time since the rules were updated in 1974 that the prize had been awarded to someone who was deceased. “This is a unique situation we are facing,” he said. Prior to 1974, a person could be awarded a prize posthumously if they had already been nominated before February of the same year. That was the case for Erik Axel Karlfeldt, who won the Nobel prize in literature in 1931, and Dag Hammarskjöld, who won the Nobel peace prize in 1961. In a statement on Monday, Marc Tessier-Lavigne, president of Rockefeller University, said the university was “delighted” the Nobel Foundation had recognised Steinman’s “seminal discoveries” concerning the body’s immune system. “But the news is bittersweet, as we also learned this morning from Ralph’s family that he passed a few days ago after a long battle with cancer,” the statement said. Steinman’s daughter, Alexis, added: “We are all so touched that our father’s many years of hard work are being recognised with a Nobel prize. He devoted his life to his work and his family, and he would be truly honoured.” The president of the Royal Society, Sir Paul Nurse – himself a Nobel laureate – said: “This is a great tragedy. Ralph Steinman’s work was ahead of its time and he waited too long for the Nobel prize. To die just days before its announcement is almost too much to bear. He will be remembered as one of the great immunologists of our time.” The award panel at Sweden’s Karolinska Institute in Stockholm praised the researchers for work that “revolutionised our understanding of the immune system by discovering key principles for its activation”. Beutler, head of genetics at the Scripps Research Institute in California, and Hoffmann, director of research at the French national centre for scientific research, discovered one of the body’s first lines of defence, where the immune system senses and destroys bacteria, fungi and viruses, and initiates inflammation to block their attacks. Steinman’s work in 1973 shed light on the immune system’s second line of defence, where sentinel “dendritic” cells direct the body’s killer T cells to attack foreign organisms. For many years, his work was dismissed as flawed by the wider scientific community. In an interview with Bloomberg News, Beutler said: “I woke up in the middle of the night and glanced at my cellphone, and the first thing I saw was a message line that just said the words ‘Nobel prize’. Needless to say, I grabbed it and started looking at the messages. Wow.” Nobel prizes Science prizes Ian Sample guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Mahmoud Jibril and Mustafa Abdul-Jalil to step down as post-Gaddafi government takes shape Libya’s new leaders are poised to declare the country’s “full liberation” is complete and appoint a new transitional government. The new government regards the war as in effect won even though there is still heavy fighting in former leader Muammar Gaddafi’s hometown of Sirte, one of the last loyalist holdouts, and Bani Walid still remains under the control of pro-Gaddafi forces who are besieged inside. The declaration and the formation of a new government – with elections planned after eight months – are intended to bring an end to an increasingly dangerous political vacuum in Libya. The interim prime minister, Mahmoud Jibril, and the head of the National Transitional Council (NTC), Mustafa Abdul-Jalil, plan to step down, having pledged to take no further part in the country’s future government. The NTC constitution specifies that no temporary government figures should serve in any future elected Libyan government. The latest attempts to bring about an end to the developing political crisis in Libya comes as military leaders described the latest push on Sirte, which began on Monday after a two-day truce, as the “final assault”. Anti-Gaddafi fighters backed by Nato aircraft have made slow progress in capturing Sirte, facing fierce resistance from former regime loyalists inside the town where weeks of fighting have triggered a humanitarian crisis among its civilian population. It has become clear in the past few days, however, that the country’s new rulers are now anxious to bring the siege of Sirte to a quick conclusion. Originally it had been understood that no new government would be announced until all of the remaining pockets of pro-Gaddafi resistance had been liberated, including the town of Bani Walid. But Abdul-Jalil told a press conference in Benghazi that, unlike the coastal city of Sirte, the landlocked Bani Walid did not pose a threat to Libya’s borders. “We ask Libyans to understand that this is a sensitive and critical stage,” he said, referring to growing concern over delays in appointing a government to lead the country into its first elections since the fall of the Gaddafi regime. It emerged that a commander from the city of Misrata, understood to be Salem Jouha, is expected to be the country’s defence minister after liberation. Misrata has distanced itself from the NTC in recent weeks and Libya’s new rulers have struggled since the fall of Tripoli to reconcile all the competing political interests. Friction remains between more secular figures and Islamists such as Abdel Hakim Belhaj, head of Tripoli’s military council, who wrote in the Guardian last week that Islamists should not be sidelined in the new Libya. The renewed political and military focus on Sirte comes as a Red Cross convoy was prevented from reaching the town on Monday to deliver supplies to the Ibn Sina hospital. NTC fighters have denied a claim they are to blame for starting the shooting. With no electricity, and shortages of food, medicine and drinking water, aid groups warned of an impending humanitarian disaster in the city. Several thousand people have managed to escape – some taking up to 10 days to get out – but other civilians are still trapped in Sirte, which continues to be bombed by Nato aircraft and shelled by fighters of the new government. NTC troops said on Monday they now controlled most of Qasr Abu Hadi, the small town close to Sirte where Gaddafi was born in a tent in 1942. Libya Middle East Africa Muammar Gaddafi Arab and Middle East unrest Peter Beaumont guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Amanda Knox gave an emotional appeal to an Italian court today, insisting, “I did not kill, I did not rape” Meredith Kercher. “I am paying with my life for things that I did not commit,” said a shaking and tearful Knox in fluent Italian. “I am not who they say…
Continue reading …