You cell phone is … where again? If that question fills you with panic, you may be a nomophobe—someone who fears being without a cell phone, the Los Angeles Times reports. Odd as it may seem, two thirds of 1,000 people polled in a British survey say they feared…
Continue reading …Waffle House is home to more than wacky crime and weird behavior . It also has an equally weird Twitter feed—that is, if you consider it strange for corporate entities to solicit our opinions on current events, Jon Bershad writes on Mediaite . Waffle House’s recent tweets about Whitney Houston and…
Continue reading …The Virginia House of Delegates delayed a hotly contested anti-abortion bill today after hundreds of women protested silently outside, the Richmond Times-Dispatch reports. On the verge of passing, the bill would mandate an ultrasound for every woman planning an abortion and give her the choice of viewing the fetus. But…
Continue reading …Yesterday’s riot at a prison in northern Mexico not only killed 44 inmates, but also covered up the escape of 30 members of the infamous Zeta drug cartel, Mexican officials say. “Without a doubt there was premeditation,” says the governor of Nuevo Leon, Rodrigo Medina. “This was planned.” All of…
Continue reading …A Colorado town with the motto “Honor the Past, Envision the Future” is considering three more letters to advertise itself: “WTF”—as in, “Welcome to Fruita.” A couple printed out 500 stickers with the term and handed them out to businesses in downtown Fruita, sparking the idea of a new…
Continue reading …The UK government is working on an anti-terror plan that would require service providers to record and store details on every call, text, email, or even Twitter direct message sent by anyone in the country—along with all their complete browsing history. Companies would then keep that info on file…
Continue reading …Hardline demands from northern European governments dampen hopes second rescue package will be signed off The Greek people and their government were on Monday being made to sweat at the hands of European finance ministers for a €130bn (£110bn) bailout to save the country from bankruptcy and the eurozone from collapse. Hardline demands from northern European governments dampened initial optimism that the eurogroup of 17 finance ministers would sign off on a second rescue package for the stricken Greek economy in less than two years. Jean-Claude Juncker, the prime minister of Luxembourg, who was chairing the meeting in Brussels, had said on arriving: “I am of the opinion that today we have to deliver, because we don’t have any more time”. The brinkmanship came amid conflicting assessments of the likely impact of a Greek debt default, with some arguing it would provoke runs on banks and a pan-European depression and others insisting it would swiftly be contained and ultimately encourage new Greek competitiveness. Greece must repay €14.4bn of its debt by 20 March, but some European diplomats said the bailout might not be finalised until just days before that deadline – if at all. The Dutch and Germans refused to endorse the package even though Evangelos Venizelos, the Greek finance minister, who arrived with his prime minister, Lucas Papademos, insisted Athens had now met all the conditions for the bailout. “For Greeks, this is a matter of national dignity and a national strategic choice and no other integrated and responsible choice can be opposed to it,” he declared. Jan Kees de Jager, his Dutch counterpart, raised the stakes before what promised to be a long and stormy meeting, by resetting tough conditions for approving the bailout, including the permanent stationing of non-Greek fiscal watchdogs in Athens. “Greece wants the money and so far we haven’t given them anything. We have said no over the past weeks. We can afford to say to no until Greece has met all the demands. It’s up to Greece and the troika [European Central Bank, IMF and European Commission] to say whether this has been done and for us it is a no until Greece has done so. If Greece lives up to all its obligations, then the Netherlands will also do its part,” he said. Dutch sources said the conservative-led minority government in the Hague would refuse to sign up for any deal that did not commit the Greek government to deliver a debt-to-GDP ratio of 120% by 2020 and allowed a drift to, say, 125% or 129% – the level assumed by the troika’s latest analysis of Greece’s depressed economy, which contracted 7% last year. “Debt sustainability is a key issue for us too,” said a German source, pointing out that the IMF would also refuse to back a deal that did not ensure such sustainability. Christine Lagarde, the IMF managing director, simply noted that Greece had made “significant efforts”. The IMF has already indicated that, whereas it contributed around a third of the first €109bn Greek rescue package, it would pay only 10-15% this time – forcing eurozone governments to pay in more. Dutch officials made plain there could be no question of increasing the rescue package to €138bn, as suggested in some quarters because the Greek economy is contracting faster than expected. “We’ve seen that Greece time and time again fails to satisfy the conditions that the international community makes … In the Netherlands, it really is an issue that you have to lend money to a country that for the umpteenth time hasn’t held itself to its agreements,” De Jager said. The German finance minister, Wolfgang Schäuble, said on arrival that he was confident a deal would be struck, but Berlin officials made plain there was an array of issues to be settled first – not least ensuring that Athens lived up to its promises, cut spending, reformed its archaic labour laws and repaid its debts. “We’re not talking about imposing commissars on each Greek ministry as it’s sometimes alleged in Athens, but ensuring that these fiscal commitments are met. That needs constant surveillance, but the mechanism for doing so is yet to be agreed,” one said. The German government is suggesting that the specially-designated (escrow) account set up to ensure that bailout monies are used to service debt and not for general public spending should be controlled by, say, senior IMF and Greek National [central] Bank officials. The conflict continued ahead of a likely decision by all 27 EU finance ministers, including the British chancellor, George Osborne, on Tuesday to approve new powers for Brussels to monitor fiscal policy within eurozone countries – and demand budget changes, in an unprecedented erosion of national sovereignty. There were some reports that Athens and Brussels had agreed that both the ECB and national central banks would take part in the debt relief programme by putting some of their profits on Greek debt into the bailout fund. But a deal with private bondholders, a core element of the overall agreement, was also at risk because the banks and other institutions could be forced to accept an even deeper “haircut” than the 70% discussed with Athens. Greek sources indicated this was part of the tense negotiations and might unravel. Any deal agreed also needs to be ratified by the parliaments of Germany, the Netherlands and Finland. The Bundestag is to debate the package on 27 February, though this may slip because of delays in completing its final details, and is certain to approve it despite loud complaints about Greek “fecklessness”. “There’s been a complete breakdown of trust between Germans and Greeks,” one European diplomat said. “The atmosphere has got extremely nasty, with all this talk of sending in the controllers.” Earlier, David Cameron tried to shift the focus of next week’s EU summit to jobs and growth by releasing an eight-point letter signed by himself and 11 other government heads – including Italy’s Mario Monti and Spain’s Mariano Rajoy. It was the first time the Italian and Spanish premiers had backed such a UK-led initiative. But conspicuously absent from the declaration, which urged a boost to growth via liberalisation of services, were the names of Angela Merkel, the German chancellor, and Nicolas Sarkozy, the French president, who traditionally launch their own “call to arms” before each EU summit. Greece European Union Europe Germany Netherlands Finland Euro Eurozone crisis European Central Bank Banking Euro Financial crisis David Gow guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …• Tories down four points to 36% in latest Guardian/ICM poll • Labour up one point on 37%, Lib Dems down two on 14% • Majority of respondents (52%) want NHS bill dropped David Cameron has squandered the Conservatives’ new year lead as voters turn against his health reforms, according to a Guardian/ICM poll. The Tories are down by four percentage points in a single month, slipping from 40% to 36% since January. Labour is one point ahead, on 37%, with Ed Miliband’s party up from 35% last month. The Liberal Democrats slip back two to stand at 14%, and the combined total of the smaller parties has climbed by four points, to 13%. As the prime minister hosted a special NHS summit , which excluded the professional bodies most opposed to his health and social care bill , the public is siding with those royal medical colleges who want the legislation ditched. An outright majority of respondents, 52%, say that the bill – which would overhaul NHS management, increase competition and give family doctors more financial responsibility – should be dropped. That is against 33% who believe it is better to stick with the plans at this stage. The 19-point overall margin in favour of abandoning the legislation is mirrored in strong leads for killing the bill across all social classes and regions, as well as among male and female voters. Only the very youngest respondents aged 18 to 24, the least likely to vote, favour sticking with the plans, by 46% to 39%. Opposition hardens with age, and is at its most marked among the over-65s – who favour dropping the bill by a 56% to 29% margin. A third of Conservatives (31%) and a significant majority of Lib Dem voters (57%) also want the proposed law to be ditched. With crunch votes on the drive to extend medical competition likely to take place in the House of Lords next week, the role of the private sector in the health service is becoming more controversial. Even though respondents were reminded that private companies already provide some NHS treatments, a clear majority, 53%, believe that such competition undermines the health service, compared with just 39% who believe it forces the NHS to raise its service standards. When ICM asked a slightly different question on private involvement in September 2005, at the height of the controversy about Tony Blair’s NHS reforms, opinion was evenly split – with 48% in favour of more private involvement, and 49% against. There are signs that the Conservatives’ failure to persuade the public about its NHS reforms could contribute to a “retoxification” of the Tory brand. Cameron – who once said his priorities could be summed up in the three letters “NHS” – initially invested a great deal of effort in overcoming the Conservatives’ historic difficulties on the terrain of health. One year into his leadership, ICM found he had made progress – in October 2006 only 31% said they did not trust the Tories at all to run the health service, as against 32% who said the same of Labour. In the latest poll, however, 40% of respondents said they did not trust the Conservatives at all, against 25% who say the same about Labour. Only a minority of voters trust either of the main parties “a lot” on the health service – 23% for Labour, and a mere 13% for the Conservatives. Labour is trusted “a little” by 46% of respondents, while 42% say the same of the Conservatives. Lib Dems will be especially interested in the results of the poll. The party’s peers could provide the decisive swing votes to amend the health bill in the Lords, and – with many of the party’s activists anxious about the reforms – the NHS is expected to loom large at its spring conference next month. The junior coalition partner can point to a series of concessions it has wrung out of the Conservatives since last year’s “pause” in the legislation’s progress, but the public does not seem to have noticed. Just 9% trust the Lib Dems a lot on health, against 45% who trust them a little and 39% who do not trust them at all, figures that are strikingly similar to those for the Tories. By 50% to 46%, remaining Lib Dem supporters are inclined to believe that competition can spur the NHS to raise its game. But among the larger group who backed the party in the 2010 election, the predominant view is that competition will instead undermine the health service, by a two-to-one margin of 60% to 32%. Dropping the bill would be especially popular among 2010 Lib Dem voters, with 67% of them backing that option, as against just 21% of this group who want the government to stick with its plans. ICM Research interviewed a random sample of 1,013 adults aged 18+ by telephone on 17-19 February 2012. Interviews were conducted across the country and the results have been weighted to the profile of all adults. ICM is a member of the British Polling Council and abides by its rules. Opinion polls NHS Health Health policy Public services policy Conservatives Labour Liberal Democrats Tom Clark guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …The 9th Circuit Court in California struck down as unconstitutional the state’s voter-passed ban on gay marriage Tuesday, ruling 2-1 that it violates the rights of gay Californians. [View a slideshow of demonstrations around Prop. 8 here] “Proposition 8 serves no purpose, and has no effect, other than to lessen the status and human dignity
Continue reading …