Bodies of dictator, his son and a general are given full Islamic rites and washed by relatives and sheikhs before secret burial The belated finale for Muammar Gaddafi began on a marble slab in a car park and ended with a lonely burial in the desert far from the reach of family or foe. After his body spent five days on gruesome display, Libya’s new rulers finally decided late on Monday night to put Gaddafi to rest, capping a week of uncertainty about what to do with the slain despot’s remains and closing an era of fear and infamy. “We gave him all the Islamic rituals that we would give any Muslim,” said the deputy chief of Libya’s new governing council in Misrata, Sadiq Badi. “It was more than he would have given us, but we gave him a dignified end.” He was prepared for burial alongside two other corpses – his son Mutassim and his former military chief, Abu Bakr Younes, who had been holed up with him during the fall of Sirte. Just before midnight, three Islamic holy men, all of whom have been imprisoned by rebels, along with three family members of the dead men, were taken from their cells in Misrata to a building on the outskirts of town. The six men were told to wash the three bodies. Younes’s sons, Osma and Younes, were allowed to clean their father, while the grandson of Gaddafi’s sister, Sharif al-Gaddafi, had the task of washing his great-uncle. They were the only family members allowed near the bodies. Libyan officials rejected repeated requests from the Gaddafi tribe in Sirte to hand over their patron and leader. Overtures from his wife, Safia, and daughter Aisha were also turned down. Alongside the men were three sheikhs who the regime had used to help secure its 42-year grip. Khaled Tantoush, Medina Shwarfa and Samira Jarousi were loyal to Gaddafi until the end, their captors say. They crouched at a cream-coloured marble slab, which was slick with water from a nearby garden hose. Nearby, three tables stood illuminated by a giant lamp, a generator purring next to them and uniformed rebels watching from the shadows. The slab was outside a nondescript government building that like many others in Misrata had been ravaged during the civil war. It was purpose-built for washing corpses, an essential prerequisite for Islamic burials, almost all of which are conducted within 24 hours of death. The extended time above ground had clearly taken a toll on Gaddafi’s remains and Tantoush said preparing the dictator for burial was an unpleasant experience. For most of the previous five days, the decaying bodies had been displayed on blood-stained mattresses in a meat-packing crate, with thousands of people clamouring for trophy photographs . The spectacle had stirred disquiet in Misrata and turned stomachs abroad. Libyan officials defended the display as a need for people of this traumatised country to find closure and to see for themselves that their 42-year ordeal was over. “I didn’t feel anything when I was washing him,” said Tantoush. “I was just doing my duty as a Muslim. He was a person and he should be properly buried.” “Liar,” muttered one of his jailers, Haithem Danduna, at Tantoush. “He is a chameleon,” he added, pointing at Tantoush. “He was green until a week ago,” in reference to the colour of the regime. Appearing flustered, the sheikh continued: “It was a good thing what they did last night, allowing us to bury him. It was a good start of a new beginning. After we finished washing him we moved to the tables and we wrapped them in white, then prayed for them. The whole process took about an hour. The guards helped us move the bodies.” The whereabouts of Gaddafi’s grave is a closely guarded secret in Misrata. Authorities here and elsewhere in Libya are anxious to avoid his grave site becoming a shrine for his supporters, or a target for his enemies. Of his inner circle, only Gaddafi’s long-term driver, Huneish Nasr, and Sharif were present at the burial alongside rebel guards. “We are not going to let him be remembered as a martyr,” said Danduna. “He got a proper burial and now let the desert consume him.” Across town, at a cemetery for nameless victims of the war, gravedigger Salam Zwaid pointed a gnarled hand at the grey slabs behind him. “This is the best Gaddafi could have hoped for,” he said, walking through the shallow graves, all of which were sealed by cheap concrete. “He saw himself as the king of kings, someone who was better than all of this,” he said. “But he was no god. He was a person and a bad person at that. No one should learn where he was buried.” Back at the prison, Tantoush claimed the burial could be cathartic for Libya, where Gaddafi’s brutal end is still sinking in. “In the beginning I thought he was righteous and on the right path,” he said in remarks his jailers insisted were self-serving. “And after 17 February every bit of news we got was wrong. We didn’t know this was a real revolution. “I was in Sirte and after a while we knew he was there. But I changed my support for him a month ago when they wouldn’t let the Red Cross enter to treat the wounded. After that it all became clear. “His death should wake people up. It is time to move on now. I hope people never find his grave. If they wanted to tell me where it was, I would not want to know. All Libyans should think the same.” Pictures of Gaddafi’s corpse continue to be published in Libyan newspapers and shown on TV. Freshly painted graffiti on the streets of Tripoli – in Arabic and English – read: “Dictator Gaddafi sent a message to the Libyan people from hell, saying ‘I am staying here.’” Images were also circulating on the internet apparently showing Gaddafi being sodomised with a stick or metal rod. The footage was shot on a video on a mobile phone and includes sounds of gunfire and shouts of “Allahu akbar.” Muammar Gaddafi Libya Middle East Africa Martin Chulov Ian Black guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Liberal filmmaker Michael Moore pleaded with an anchor from business channel CNBC Monday to “please do your job” and report on problems facing 99 percent of Americans, instead of the wealthy one percent. “Moore is not one to hold back when it comes to capitalism, corporate American and now the movement to Occupy Wall Street,” the CNBC anchor began the segment by announcing. “He joins us this morning from outside the [New York Stock Exchange].” “Well, we’re not actually outside the New York Stock Exchange,” Moore revealed. “You have moved me down here to Broadway, so that — apparently, you’ve been told or you’re not allowed to have me there in front of the [stock exchange]. You know, when I’ve interviewed with you in the past, you’ve tried to actually bring me into your studio at the stock exchange and the stock exchange will not allow me inside of the building… so the last two interviews we’ve done in the past few years have been done out on the street, we’ve done them outside in front of the stock exchange.” “Why do you think that is?” the anchor wondered. “Because I asked around this morning and could not get a straight answer as to why we couldn’t have you here sitting next to me.” “I think they probably don’t want me to come inside the New York Stock Exchange and be critical of this unjust and unfair economic system that we have, that benefits the wealthiest few in expense of the many,” Moore explained. “It’s too bad that they are that afraid of a guy in a ball cap with a high school education, coming in there to say that… I’m not who you need to worry about. You need to worry about the millions who have lost their jobs. You need to worry about the people who have lost their health care. You need to worry about the 99 percent who are quite angry.” Moore added that as a business network, CNBC really had a duty to shine a light on problems like income inequality. “This is a rigged casino. I don’t know why anybody would put their hard-earned money into this especially after what happened in this last decade. The guys on this street played with people’s futures, people’s pension funds, credit default swaps, no regulation from D.C. and it’s still going on! And if I could just very respectfully ask you and CNBC, you know, you are in this, you are journalists, it’s is your job not just to report that the DOW is up 95 points already today, but go in there and find out what’s really happening. Who’s making this money? Who’s dividing this pie up so that the one percent get the majority of it? That’s really the story. That’s the story you’re fellow Americans want you to do,” he pleaded. “They want to know where their jobs went. You know, where their future is going to be. That’s the job of CNBC. So, please do your job! Please!” “We look out for the 45 percent of Americans who have 401Ks,” the anchor admitted.
Continue reading …There are two kinds of Republicans: hypocrites and honest hypocrites. There is one Republican value: winning. Values are something they use to win, but when they’re pushed to the wall, they abandon them all to the virtue of the win. Pat Robertson shows us how it’s done. Via RightWingWatch , a classic moment where Robertson quotes one of his favorite politicians, Lyndon Johnson: I believe it was Lyndon Johnson that said, ‘Don’t these people realize if they push me over to an extreme position I’ll lose the election? And I’m the one who will be supporting what they want but they’re going to make it so I can’t win.’ Those people in the Republican primary have got to lay off of this stuff. They’re forcing their leaders, the frontrunners, into positions that will mean they lose the general election. Now whether this did it to Cain I don’t know, but nevertheless, you appeal to the narrow base and they’ll applaud the daylights out of what you’re saying and then you hit the general election and they say ‘no way’ and then the Democrat, whoever it is, is going to just play these statements to the hilt. They’ve got to stop this! It’s just so counterproductive! This comes from the guy who says things like this : Robertson told viewers of “The 700 Club” on CBN that divorce would be OK in a situation that involves something as terrible as Alzheimer’s. “I know it sounds cruel but if he’s going to do something he should divorce her and start all over again,” he said, “[and] make sure she has custodial care and somebody looking after her.” If ever there was anyone who was forcing politicians into weird positions, it’s Robertson. He’s the guy who sends it out over the airwaves to grannies across the nation who are already scared out of their wits by the crazy email conspiracies they receive, courtesy of Liberty University and its friends. There’s a whole list here . Still, I give him credit for speaking the truth on some level. If you look past all the fluff, what he’s really saying is that these wingnuts are too vocal right now. He’s not against what they’re saying; he just wants them to quit saying it out loud so their frontrunner can lie enough to get elected. There you have it: right-wing values writ large in one short video clip.
Continue reading …There are two kinds of Republicans: hypocrites and honest hypocrites. There is one Republican value: winning. Values are something they use to win, but when they’re pushed to the wall, they abandon them all to the virtue of the win. Pat Robertson shows us how it’s done. Via RightWingWatch , a classic moment where Robertson quotes one of his favorite politicians, Lyndon Johnson: I believe it was Lyndon Johnson that said, ‘Don’t these people realize if they push me over to an extreme position I’ll lose the election? And I’m the one who will be supporting what they want but they’re going to make it so I can’t win.’ Those people in the Republican primary have got to lay off of this stuff. They’re forcing their leaders, the frontrunners, into positions that will mean they lose the general election. Now whether this did it to Cain I don’t know, but nevertheless, you appeal to the narrow base and they’ll applaud the daylights out of what you’re saying and then you hit the general election and they say ‘no way’ and then the Democrat, whoever it is, is going to just play these statements to the hilt. They’ve got to stop this! It’s just so counterproductive! This comes from the guy who says things like this : Robertson told viewers of “The 700 Club” on CBN that divorce would be OK in a situation that involves something as terrible as Alzheimer’s. “I know it sounds cruel but if he’s going to do something he should divorce her and start all over again,” he said, “[and] make sure she has custodial care and somebody looking after her.” If ever there was anyone who was forcing politicians into weird positions, it’s Robertson. He’s the guy who sends it out over the airwaves to grannies across the nation who are already scared out of their wits by the crazy email conspiracies they receive, courtesy of Liberty University and its friends. There’s a whole list here . Still, I give him credit for speaking the truth on some level. If you look past all the fluff, what he’s really saying is that these wingnuts are too vocal right now. He’s not against what they’re saying; he just wants them to quit saying it out loud so their frontrunner can lie enough to get elected. There you have it: right-wing values writ large in one short video clip.
Continue reading …There are two kinds of Republicans: hypocrites and honest hypocrites. There is one Republican value: winning. Values are something they use to win, but when they’re pushed to the wall, they abandon them all to the virtue of the win. Pat Robertson shows us how it’s done. Via RightWingWatch , a classic moment where Robertson quotes one of his favorite politicians, Lyndon Johnson: I believe it was Lyndon Johnson that said, ‘Don’t these people realize if they push me over to an extreme position I’ll lose the election? And I’m the one who will be supporting what they want but they’re going to make it so I can’t win.’ Those people in the Republican primary have got to lay off of this stuff. They’re forcing their leaders, the frontrunners, into positions that will mean they lose the general election. Now whether this did it to Cain I don’t know, but nevertheless, you appeal to the narrow base and they’ll applaud the daylights out of what you’re saying and then you hit the general election and they say ‘no way’ and then the Democrat, whoever it is, is going to just play these statements to the hilt. They’ve got to stop this! It’s just so counterproductive! This comes from the guy who says things like this : Robertson told viewers of “The 700 Club” on CBN that divorce would be OK in a situation that involves something as terrible as Alzheimer’s. “I know it sounds cruel but if he’s going to do something he should divorce her and start all over again,” he said, “[and] make sure she has custodial care and somebody looking after her.” If ever there was anyone who was forcing politicians into weird positions, it’s Robertson. He’s the guy who sends it out over the airwaves to grannies across the nation who are already scared out of their wits by the crazy email conspiracies they receive, courtesy of Liberty University and its friends. There’s a whole list here . Still, I give him credit for speaking the truth on some level. If you look past all the fluff, what he’s really saying is that these wingnuts are too vocal right now. He’s not against what they’re saying; he just wants them to quit saying it out loud so their frontrunner can lie enough to get elected. There you have it: right-wing values writ large in one short video clip.
Continue reading …It is thought that more than £50m of gold and silver could be extracted from Cononish mine near Tyndrum Plans have been approved to develop Scotland’s first commercial gold mine. It is thought that more than £50m of gold and silver could be extracted from the site at Cononish, near Tyndrum. Around 50 jobs are expected to be created in the 10-year project . Scotgold Resources submitted an application to the Loch Lomond and the Trossachs national park authority in July after another application was refused last year. At a special hearing of the case, the national park convener, Linda McKay, said: “Without question, this has been the largest and most complicated planning application we have ever had to consider. “As guardians of some of the most stunning scenery in Scotland, it would have been easy to refuse the second application if we were considering the short-term impact on the landscape, but this National Park plans for long-term conservation management, and that includes having the vision to see beyond the temporary life of the gold mine.” The original application for planning permission to explore the mine was rejected because of concerns over poor restoration proposals for Glen Cononish. Scotgold and the park authority worked together to resolve the objections. McKay said: “We also have a 30-year commitment to improve the wider Glen Cononish. The Greater Cononish Glen management plan will include extending existing native Caledonian pine forest and improving habitats and access tracks. “This legally binding agreement means the glen will regain its quiet, remote character following closure of the mine and the landscape will be improved from its current state.” The development covers 39 hectares and the annual extraction will be approximately 72,000 tonnes of ore, with 21,000 ounces of gold and 83,000 ounces of silver estimated to be recovered annually. Almost 50 conditions have been attached to the approved application, including a 30-year conservation plan for Glen Cononish, bat and otter surveys, as well as limits on extraction, working hours and blasting. Scotland Mining Gold Mining guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Derry’s UK City of Culture office also targeted by dissident republican group The Real IRA has admitted bombing two banks in Northern Ireland as well as the UK City of Culture office in Derry, and has warned that it will continue to target economic interests. In a statement to the Guardian laced with anti-capitalist rhetoric, the Real IRA said the bombings and future targeting of the banking system were its response to bankers’ “greed” and were meant “to send out the message that while the Irish national and class struggles are distinct, they are not separate”. The attacks and the language used in attempting to justify them appeared designed to tap into the widespread public loathing of the banks on both sides of the Irish border. The republican dissident group was unapologetic about bombing the office of the UK City of Culture 2013 in Derry last week. It said the office was a symbolic target because the City of Culture award to Derry underpinned British rule. In its most bellicose warning yet to the banks on both sides of the Irish Sea and the border, the Real IRA said: “The IRA has recently carried out a number of bomb attacks on the banking establishment. “Such attacks are an integral part of our strategy of targeting the financial infrastructure that supports the British government’s capitalist colonial system in Ireland. The impetus to carry out this type of attack is directly linked to pressure from working-class communities in Ireland as a whole. “At a grassroots level, working-class communities are suffering most from the effects of cuts to essential services and poverty is now endemic. Families who have lost income as a result of the financial crisis – caused by the bankers – are being intimidated and some are being evicted from their homes.” The organisation added that “the ruling class of bankers and politicians are disconnected from the consequences of their disastrous policies and decisions”. In May, masked men threw a holdall containing a device into Santander’s branch in Derry city centre. In August, a bomb was thrown into Santander in Hill Street, Newry. A Real IRA bomb caused major damage to a branch of the Ulster Bank in Derry last year. The terror group attempted to link the banks to the Police Service of Northern Ireland. “In the six counties, the effective power of the system is vested in heavily armed PSNI units who, ultimately, enforce bank repossessions of homes, vehicles, etc,” it said. “The PSNI is not a police force, it is a political militia and a social control tool designed to protect the interests of the British establishment whether financial or political.” In September last year, the Real IRA had issued a warning that banks and bankers could be targeted . As well as the attack in Derry’s Guildhall Square last week, a bomb was left there on 12 October last year. The organisation predicted such incidents in the runup to Derry becoming a City of Culture in 15 months’ time. The Real IRA statement said: “The IRA has also carried out bombing operations against the so-called UK City of Culture offices in Derry city centre. It should be obvious that our objection is focused on the political exploitation of Derry’s name and culture. Republicans view this charade as an elaboration of the well-choreographed ‘peace process’ which resulted in former IRA personnel serving as British ministers. “This time, the whole nationalist community is expected to join in celebrations of their place within the United Kingdom and thereby realise the Thatcherite policy of regarding the six counties as being ‘as British as Finchley’. Expressions of Irish identity within the context of 2013 will be effectively ‘licensed’ by the organisers under the banner UK City of Culture.” The group added: “The timing of the UK City of Culture is linked to the economic crisis: cash-strapped businesses naturally follow the carrot of increased revenue in 2013, politicians under pressure to produce jobs are totally compliant, anyone who objects is smeared or labelled a ‘dissident’. The goodwill of our communities is being held to ransom, critical thinking is seen as dangerous, whole communities are being encouraged to adopt a herd mentality. The IRA will continue to challenge this; resistance will continue.” The bombing of the City of Culture office caused outrage throughout Derry and beyond, with hundreds demonstrating against the attack. A Real IRA representative also told the Guardian that the Sinn Féin deputy first minister, Martin McGuinness, was under no physical threat. McGuinness, a candidate for the Irish presidency, has claimed his life has been under threat from republican dissidents in recent years. “Why would we turn him into a so-called martyr?” the Real IRA representative said. Real IRA Northern Ireland Ireland Henry McDonald guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …It’s a measure of how effective the Occupy Wall Street movement has become, that the right-wing feels compelled to attack them as having ties to Muslim extremists. More importantly, it’s a barometer of just how frightened they are of losing the spotlight to real populism: In a development that should surprise no one, some on the right-wing are accusing the Occupy Wall Street movement of having ties to the Muslim Brotherhood.“JIHAD ALERT,” the anti-“Shariah Islam” group “The United West” declares in a blog post. “‘OCCUPY ORLANDO’ or JIHAD ORLANDO?” Tom Trento, the group’s director, explains that Occupy Orlando is a “move by a Muslim activist to take over control of ‘Occupy Orlando,’ in the ‘spirit of the Arab Spring.’” An accompanying video shows Trento attending an Occupy Orlando protest last weekend, and warning about activist Shayan Elahi, who Trento says is “associated with CAIR and the Muslim Brotherhood.” Elahi is a local Democratic activist and a Muslim civil-rights attorney who is also legal counsel for Occupy Orlando, according to My Fox Orlando.Trento writes : Once we watched Shayan Elahi in action, running around, signing up speakers, providing direction, telling people what to do, we started to connect the dots to the stated Face Book Mission Statement of “Occupy Orlando,” which reads, “…we plan to use the revolutionary Arab Spring tactic of mass occupation to restore democracy in America.”
Continue reading …One campaigner said the announcement was a public relations exercise akin to ‘putting Dracula in charge of a blood bank’ Alleged victims of sexual abuse have reacted coolly to the news of a Vatican investigation into a London abbey, and have called for inquiries into other Roman Catholic institutions where children are claimed to have been mistreated. The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith in Rome has ordered an “apostolic visitation” to uncover the scale of abuse at Ealing abbey, where monks and lay teachers have been accused of mistreating children at a neighbouring school, St Benedict’s, over decades. It is the first inquiry of its kind into sexual abuse in Britain. Father David Pearce, a priest at Ealing abbey, was jailed in 2009. Groups supporting alleged victims have questioned the effectiveness and integrity of an internal inquiry, especially given that its findings will remain secret. The abuse is alleged to have dated from the 1960s to 2009. Pete Saunders, of the National Association for People Abused in Childhood, said it was a public relations exercise and akin to “putting Dracula in charge of a blood bank”. Anne Lawrence of Ministry and Clerical Sexual Abuse Survivors , said although the Ealing inquiry showed the Catholic hierarchy was beginning to understand the concept of institutional responsibility, there were other schools and other places that warranted investigation. There were, she alleged, “more than 20 schools where there was systematic abuse and we would like to see inquiries into all of them”. Relations between the church and survivor groups are already under strain. Earlier this month the Guardian revealed that victim support groups had pulled out of discussions led by the National Catholic Safeguarding Commission (NCSC) and the Catholic Safeguarding Advisory Service (CSAS). They described them as shambolic, toothless and unlikely to achieve anything by May 2012, when the pope’s deadline for a progress report expires. The talks were intended to come up with a care package for survivors of clerical sexual abuse. Graham Wilmer, who heads the Lantern Project and says he was abused by a Catholic priest as a teenager, said: “We were prepared to talk to [the institution] that had harmed us, even though it was uncomfortable … [But] we can’t trust them. What has effectively has happened is nothing.” The Catholic church in England and Wales has not suffered the same fate as those in Ireland and the US, which have been left reeling by abuse allegations. It has defended its child protection procedures, describing them as robust, and has apologised for past behaviour. But there is evidence to suggest that for all its commitment to healing and contrition, old attitudes prevail. Two civil cases show the church continuing to engage in a war of attrition with victims who were abused as children. It has denied responsibility for the alleged sexual abuse of a Portsmouth woman by one of its priests, saying the cleric was not an employee. Should the church win, it will avoid having to pay compensation to victims in the future. In another case, involving more than 150 former pupils suing for an estimated £8m for sexual and physical abuse they claim to have suffered at St William’s boys home in Market Weighton, Yorkshire, the diocese of Middlesbrough is contesting a court ruling that it is jointly liable with the De La Salle Brotherhood, a Catholic order of lay teachers, for the alleged abuse. St William’s was owned by the diocese but many of the staff were members of the Brotherhood. Claims were first launched in 2004 when the home’s former principal, Brother James Carragher, was jailed for 14 years for abusing boys. The appeal will be heard next July in the supreme court. Catholicism Religion Christianity Vatican Child protection London Riazat Butt guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …One campaigner said the announcement was a public relations exercise akin to ‘putting Dracula in charge of a blood bank’ Alleged victims of sexual abuse have reacted coolly to the news of a Vatican investigation into a London abbey, and have called for inquiries into other Roman Catholic institutions where children are claimed to have been mistreated. The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith in Rome has ordered an “apostolic visitation” to uncover the scale of abuse at Ealing abbey, where monks and lay teachers have been accused of mistreating children at a neighbouring school, St Benedict’s, over decades. It is the first inquiry of its kind into sexual abuse in Britain. Father David Pearce, a priest at Ealing abbey, was jailed in 2009. Groups supporting alleged victims have questioned the effectiveness and integrity of an internal inquiry, especially given that its findings will remain secret. The abuse is alleged to have dated from the 1960s to 2009. Pete Saunders, of the National Association for People Abused in Childhood, said it was a public relations exercise and akin to “putting Dracula in charge of a blood bank”. Anne Lawrence of Ministry and Clerical Sexual Abuse Survivors , said although the Ealing inquiry showed the Catholic hierarchy was beginning to understand the concept of institutional responsibility, there were other schools and other places that warranted investigation. There were, she alleged, “more than 20 schools where there was systematic abuse and we would like to see inquiries into all of them”. Relations between the church and survivor groups are already under strain. Earlier this month the Guardian revealed that victim support groups had pulled out of discussions led by the National Catholic Safeguarding Commission (NCSC) and the Catholic Safeguarding Advisory Service (CSAS). They described them as shambolic, toothless and unlikely to achieve anything by May 2012, when the pope’s deadline for a progress report expires. The talks were intended to come up with a care package for survivors of clerical sexual abuse. Graham Wilmer, who heads the Lantern Project and says he was abused by a Catholic priest as a teenager, said: “We were prepared to talk to [the institution] that had harmed us, even though it was uncomfortable … [But] we can’t trust them. What has effectively has happened is nothing.” The Catholic church in England and Wales has not suffered the same fate as those in Ireland and the US, which have been left reeling by abuse allegations. It has defended its child protection procedures, describing them as robust, and has apologised for past behaviour. But there is evidence to suggest that for all its commitment to healing and contrition, old attitudes prevail. Two civil cases show the church continuing to engage in a war of attrition with victims who were abused as children. It has denied responsibility for the alleged sexual abuse of a Portsmouth woman by one of its priests, saying the cleric was not an employee. Should the church win, it will avoid having to pay compensation to victims in the future. In another case, involving more than 150 former pupils suing for an estimated £8m for sexual and physical abuse they claim to have suffered at St William’s boys home in Market Weighton, Yorkshire, the diocese of Middlesbrough is contesting a court ruling that it is jointly liable with the De La Salle Brotherhood, a Catholic order of lay teachers, for the alleged abuse. St William’s was owned by the diocese but many of the staff were members of the Brotherhood. Claims were first launched in 2004 when the home’s former principal, Brother James Carragher, was jailed for 14 years for abusing boys. The appeal will be heard next July in the supreme court. Catholicism Religion Christianity Vatican Child protection London Riazat Butt guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …