On Tuesday, The Washington Post's Felicia Sonmez noted how MSNBC's Tamron Hall moderated the recent Congressional Black Caucus town hall event where Rep. Andre Carson smeared the Tea Party by accusing them of bringing back Jim Crow laws and endorsing the lynching of blacks. Former Obama aide turned NBC employee Joy-Ann Reid also attended the CBC event, but omitted Rep. Carson's attack from her report. During the August 22 town hall in Miami, Carson, a leader within the liberal Congressional Black Caucus from Indiana, actually apologized to Hall in the midst of his inflammatory remarks against the Tea Party: REP. ANDRE CARSON, (D), INDIANA: Some of these folks in Congress right now would love to see us as second-class citizens . (audience members reply, “Yes!”) Some of them in Congress right now of this Tea Party would love to see you and me – I'm sorry, Tamron – hanging on a tree . (audience members reply, “Yes!”) Some of them right now in Congress are comfortable with where we were 50 and 60 years ago. Hall anchored her 2 pm Eastern hour program from Miami on both August 22 and August 23, but as the 23rd was also the day East Coast earthquake struck, she covered the aftermath of that tremor for the entire hour, mentioning the CBC event only in passing. She hasn't mentioned it on-air since that day. In addition to Hall, the RealMreynolds blog on Wednesday pointed out that Reid, the anchor's colleague in the NBC family (as managing editor for TheGrio.com), live-Tweeted the CBC town hall. The former Obama 2008 campaign press aide, who bashed Republican presidential candidate Michele Bachmann as ” crazy ” and ” loopy ” earlier in August, and defended Newsweek's “queen of rage” cover of the Indiana congresswoman, actually highlighted Rep. Carson's lynching attack against the Tea Party in a Tweet (while admitting she didn't know his name), but neglected to mention it in her report on TheGrio.com . She did mention other attendees attacks on the conservative grassroots movements, including Rep. Frederica Wilson (” the enemy is the Tea Party “), Jesse Jackson (who, like Carson, likened the Tea Party to segregationists), and Rep. Alcee Hastings. On August 23, the day following the town hall, Reid appeared on MSNBC on the Jansing & Co. program , but focused on the jobs fair component of the CBC event, and mentioned the town hall only briefly. In the broader mainstream media, the Big Three networks have so far punted on Rep. Carson's smear of the Tea Party , ignoring covering the event on their evening news programs on Tuesday and their morning shows on Wednesday. [H/t: Matthias Reynolds on Twitter ]
Continue reading …Search for members of Gaddafi family focuses on town of Bani Walid, near the borders with Chad and Niger Libyan officials believe that prominent members of Colonel Muammar Gaddafi’s family – and perhaps the fugitive leader himself – have sought refuge in the town of Bani Walid, 100 miles south-east of Tripoli, which rebel forces have surrounded. The hunt for Gaddafi is now focused on the town and the stretch of road which leads south towards the desert city of Sabha, near Libya’s borders with Chad and Niger. The southern road is blocked, as is the exit north to Sirte. Military leaders and western officials are now certain that Gaddafi is still in Libya and does not intend to try to join his wife Safia, daughter Aisha and sons Mohammed and Hannibal in exile in Algeria. They also believe he held a brief family get-together last Friday afternoon with two of his sons, Khamis and Saadi, as well as Safia and Aisha, before leaving the capital in a convoy of civilian cars. The growing confidence about Gaddafi’s movements comes mainly from interviews with captured loyalist soldiers, including four of Khamis Gaddafi’s guards who were seized near the town of Tahouna hours after the family rendezvous, following a battle in which Khamis is believed to have been killed. “I was assigned to be [Khamis's] main guard that day,” said Abdul Salam Tahrar, a 17-year-old from Sabha brought by rebels to meet the Guardian in Tahouna. “I was in the truck behind him on the [heavy weapon] when his car was hit. He was burned.” A second guard interviewed by the Guardian said he had seen the explosion that apparently killed Khamis Gaddafi. “We were travelling in an 80-car convoy and we were told we were going to meet with Mutassim [another son of Gaddafi's] in Bani Walid.” The guards are being detained in separate cells. Two other guards are also being held. Their captors believe the accounts of all four to be credible. Separately, tribal chiefs from the Warfalla tribe, which is dominant in Bani Walid, have confirmed to rebel leaders in Tripoli that they have received important guests in recent days and have offered them their protection. The admission comes as officials in Tripoli claim to have solid information that the Gaddafi convoy that fled to Algeria over the weekend carrying Safia, Aisha and the two younger Gaddafi sons set off from Bani Walid last Friday evening. Rebel officials, backed by European intelligence agencies, are trying to establish how the Gaddafi clan made it to Bani Walid, with rebel leaders and Khamis’s guards adamant that they did not travel the same route through Tahouna that was used on Khamis’s ill-fated mission. Rebels now believe the family group took a different and more difficult route to the same destination – in a pointer to how the fugitive sons are likely to move in future. Both guards were adamant they saw Gaddafi leave Khamis’s compound with his wife and daughter. “He was there for around 15 minutes,” said Tahrar. “He was wearing civilian clothes and a head scarf, but his face was open and very clear. His wife and daughter were with him and so was Saadi. They left in a convoy of around 25 cars and he was in a Toyota pick-up. They all left together and they went south.” Rebels are in control of Tahouna, but control only roughly half of the 50-mile road south to Bani Walid. In a further sign of heightened interest in the town on Wednesday, Nato jets bombed three targets there, which they claimed were command and control centres and weapons dumps. The frontline of the push from Tripoli to Bani Walid is around 20 miles short of the town and is unlikely to move over the next two days, because of the Islamic festival of Eid, which marks the end of Ramadan. “We are giving the Warfalla time to consider their position,” said Colonel Hegegis at the Tahouna base. “We want to negotiate this if we can. They are one tribe in one town and we don’t want to fight if we don’t have to.” The reluctance to order an assault on Bani Walid also appears to stem from Saadi Gaddafi’s attempts to negotiate a transfer of power with Tripoli’s military council. The dictator’s third son contacted the military council’s commander, Abdul Hakim Belhaj to plead his own case and that of his father, Belhaj said. According to Belhaj, Saadi acknowledged the hopelessness of the family’s position. “I told him, ‘This is good,’” Belhaj told the Associated Press. “What is important for us is not to shed Libyan blood. For the members of the regime to surrender is the best way to do this.” Saadi was talking from a traceable phoneline, which suggests he is no longer trying to keep his own location a secret. Gaddafi’s cash flown out from Britain to help interim government The RAF is flying crates of Libyan banknotes worth more than £950m to the country to pay public workers and replenish cash machines. Muammar Gaddafi had ordered the cash – 1.8bn Libyan dinars – from a British printing company but the government blocked its shipment in March in one of the first moves to put pressure on the dictator. It has been kept in a safe. One-dinar and 50-dinar notes feature a portrait of Gaddafi but it could not be confirmed if the shipment included this design. The RAF was planning to hand over the cash to leaders of the NTC in its stronghold of Benghazi to help ease the flow of cash during Eid celebrations. Many public sector workers have not received a salary for weeks. The UN sanctions committee agreed to release the notes following a request from Britain after the NTC took control of much of the country and Gaddafi went into hiding. The shortage of hard cash has been a problem throughout the conflict, with long lines forming outside banks as people sought to take out their money. The NTC frequently complained of a lack of cash in areas under its control. William Hague, the foreign secretary, said the money represented a “major step forward” in helping the Libyan people. “These banknotes, which were frozen in the UK under UN sanctions, will help address urgent humanitarian needs, instil confidence in the banking sector, pay salaries of key public sector workers and free up liquidity in the economy,” he said. Muammar Gaddafi Libya Martin Chulov guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …“Obama Takes Republicans' Night From Them With Speech,” exults the August 31 headline for National Journal's story on the president's wish to give a speech on his economic recovery plan on September 7. The text of the article practically rings with approval of the president's rude and presumptuous request (emphasis mine): Next Wednesday night was supposed to belong to the Republicans. It was to be a showcase for the eight GOP presidential contenders, a chance to use two hours of national television coverage of their debate in California to bash President Obama. A chance to look presidential. But with only 198 words in a letter to the leaders of Congress, Obama has reminded them who is president right now. And it doesn’t get much more presidential than commanding the members of the House and the Senate to sit there in a joint session to get their marching orders from the commander in chief. In deciding on the grandest possible venue to unveil Obama's jobs plan and in picking Sept. 7 even though it clashes with the Republican candidates’ debate in California, the White House is playing political hardball. But it is also ratcheting up the pressure to deliver a program that is more than just a rehash of past proposals and is bold enough to put the economy on a course more positive than today’s. If Obama falls short on that measure, if his proposal looks timid or inadequate, he could regret seeking that large stage. But that will not be known until later. The immediate impact is on politics, and it assuredly leaves the eight challengers steaming and the debate sponsors miffed. In his letter requesting the audience, the president placed his speech above politics. “Washington needs to put aside politics and start making decisions based on what is best for our country and not what is best for each of our parties in order to grow the economy and create jobs. And we must answer this call,” he wrote. (Both chambers of Congress would have to approve such a session by passage of a joint resolution.) Obama promised to use the speech “to lay out a series of bipartisan proposals that the Congress can take immediately to continue to rebuild the American economy by strengthening small businesses, helping Americans get back to work, and putting more money in the paychecks of the middle class and [of] working Americans, while still reducing our deficit and getting our fiscal house in order.” At the White House, officials professed to be shocked at any suggestion that they would intentionally step on the planned GOP debate. “Of course not,” insisted a wounded-looking press secretary Jay Carney at his daily briefing. Asked how 8 p.m. Wednesday was selected, he responded, “There were a lot of considerations. You have to deal with Congress’s schedule. This is one debate of many, that is on one channel of many. That was not enough reason not to have it.”
Continue reading …Letter from son emerges claiming dictator slept with Marie-José, wife of heir to the throne Not much has stayed secret about the tumultuous private life of Benito Mussolini. That is apart from the true nature of his relationship with the woman who was to be Italy’s last queen, Marie-José of Belgium. Mussolini’s mistress, Claretta Petacci, claimed in her diary that in 1937 the then princess and wife of the heir to the throne tried and failed to seduce the dictator at a beach resort near Rome. But Marie-José may have been more successful than her rival suspected, if evidence that emerged on Wednesday is to be believed. In a letter reproduced by the weekly magazine Oggi, Mussolini’s son Romano quotes his mother as saying that there was a “brief period of intimate romantic relations between my father and the then princess of Piedmont”. The daughter of the Belgian king, Albert I, Marie-José was born in 1906. While still a child, it was decided that she should marry into the Italian royal family and in 1930 she wed Umberto of Savoy, the only son of King Victor Emmanuel. By her own subsequent account, the marriage was not a happy one, and she separated from her husband after the Italian monarchy was abolished by referendum in 1946. She lived for most of the rest of her life in Switzerland where she died in 2001. In contrast to the Savoy family, Marie-José had little time for fascism and during the Second World War made a failed attempt to broker a peace treaty with the United States. But she did, it would seem, have time for Mussolini. It has long been known that the Italian dictator was compulsively promiscuous: by one account, he had sex with at least one woman a day at his office in Palazzo Venezia for almost 14 years until the collapse of his regime in 1943. According to Petacci’s diaries from the period, Mussolini told her that the princess had tried to seduce him at Castelporziano, a coastal area south of Rome where the king had made available to him a hunting estate in which Mussolini entertained many of his lovers. She quoted the fascist leader as saying: “Marie-José came and said ‘May I?’ Then, with a small movement her dress fell and she was there virtually naked.” But she records Mussolini reassuring her that he found the princess “repulsive” and that she had made “no impression on me at all”. That is not the picture, though, that emerges from a letter written by Mussolini’s youngest son in 1971 to Antonio Terzi, a former deputy editor of the newspaper Corriere della Sera. It reads: “I can confirm in all good faith that the romantic and political relations between Marie-José and my father were often talked about at home, and I can tell you with honesty that my mother (albeit with understandable reservations) was always pretty explicit: there was a brief period of intimate romantic relations between my father and the then Princess of Piedmont that was then I believe interrupted at the instance of my father.” The report on Wednesday in Oggi said the letter was found among the journalist’s papers by his son and that Romano Mussolini’s widow had judged it authentic. Though discredited by his support for Mussolini, King Victor Emmanuel clung on to his throne after the dictator’s fall, only abdicating in favour of Umberto in May 1946. Umberto ruled for only 34 days, earning for himself the sobriquet “the May King”. Benito Mussolini Italy Second world war Belgium Europe John Hooper guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …No 10 decides to vote against Tory backbench amendment seeking to stop charities offering abortion counselling The government has reversed its position on moves to strip charities and medics of their exclusive responsibility for counselling women seeking an abortion, saying it will now advise MPs to vote against proposals from a Conservative backbencher if they are put before the Commons next week. The U-turn from the Department of Health came after Downing Street intervened in the row that arose when Nadine Dorries, the Tory MP for Mid Bedfordshire, tabled an amendment to the health and social care bill that would mean all women seeking an abortion were offered advice independent of the abortion provider. The government will continue to consult about ways to improve counselling services for women seeking a termination but the results are no longer a foregone conclusion. Downing Street sources said that David Cameron, Nick Clegg and other senior members of the government would vote against the Dorries amendment. The Department of Health had previously said that new “independent” counselling was a certainty. The U-turn, stemming from No 10′s frustration about the health department’s handling of the situation, is another embarrassing blow for the health secretary, Andrew Lansley. The Dorries amendment, if approved, could sideline abortion charities such as the British Pregnancy Advisory Service and Marie Stopes International, and leave the system in disarray. Dorries claims the charities face a conflict because they both provide counselling and are paid to provide abortions, that her proposal would reduce abortions by a third, and that an alternative offer would prevent women being rushed into abortions that they may later regret. Pro-choice campaigners say this could delay abortions and strip abortion services of their ability to provide counselling. On Sunday, in an apparent attempt to placate Dorries’s growing number of backbench supporters and avoid the amendment dominating next week’s parliamentary debate, the Department of Health said it wanted to introduce an offer of independent counselling, separate from the abortion providers, promising to consult on how best to do it. An aide to Lansley confirmed that the move was partly in response to Dorries’s proposals, triggering accusations that the government was caving in to the anti-abortion lobby, which has backed the move. Senior Liberal Democrats were incensed. No 10 sources said Cameron was supportive of the idea that all women should be offered a choice of counselling but had become concerned at the idea that existing charities might be relieved of their responsibilities and so would now vote against the motion. “The prime minister believes that women should have a choice, a proper choice, not any one selective group of organisations,” the source said. After No 10′s intervention, the Department of Health said there would be a consultation on the “best” form of counselling for women. “The discussions currently under way do not represent any moral shift in the government’s approach to abortion as an issue, and there are no changes to the Abortion Act involved,” it said. “Instead the concern is to ensure that women, in what is an extremely difficult and often traumatic situation, have access to information and counselling that best meets their needs. We will continue to discuss this with all involved in the debate. We plan to consult widely on these proposals later this year.” If the amendment is selected next week, it will be a free vote for MPs, as is the tradition with the most controversial “matters of conscience”. But coalition MPs will be steered to vote against it. It is understood that the prime minister, the health ministers and other senior members of the government will vote against. Labour has adopted a similar position. But a combination of the unpredictable intake of new Tory MPs, split between social conservatives and modernisers, the number of Roman Catholic Labour MPs, and the high degree of nuance of the amendment make it extremely unclear which way the vote will go. Abortion Health policy Health Women Polly Curtis guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Court documents illustrate how US contracted out secret rendition transportation to a network of private companies The scale of the CIA’s rendition programme has been laid bare in court documents that illustrate in minute detail how the US contracted out the secret transportation of suspects to a network of private American companies. The manner in which American firms flew terrorism suspects to locations around the world, where they were often tortured, has emerged after one of the companies sued another in a dispute over fees. As the 10th anniversary of 9/11 approaches, the mass of invoices, receipts, contracts and email correspondence – submitted as evidence to a court in upstate New York – provides a unique glimpse into a world in which the “war on terror” became just another charter opportunity for American businesses. As a result of the case, the identities of some of the corporations involved in the rendition programme have been disclosed for the first time, along with the names of some of the executives who knew the purpose of the flights. One unintended consequence may be that some of those corporations and individuals are now at risk of being sued in proceedings brought on behalf of the al-Qaida and Taliban suspects who were the victims of the programme. The New York case concerns Sportsflight, an aircraft broker, and Richmor, an aircraft operator. Sportsflight entered into an arrangement to make a Gulfstream IV executive jet available at $4,900 an hour rather than the market rate of $5,450. A crew was available to fly at 12 hours’ notice. The government wanted “the cheapest aircraft to fulfil a mission”, Sportsflight’s owner, Don Moss, told the court. But it was the early days of the rendition programme, and business was booming: the court heard that Sportsflight told Richmor: “The client says we’re going to be very, very busy.” Invoices submitted to the court as evidence tally with flights suspected of ferrying around individuals who were captured and delivered into the CIA’s network of secret jails around the world. Some of the invoices present in stark detail the expense claims that crew members were submitting on their secret journeys, down to £3 biscuits and £30 bottles of wine. One Gulfstream jet has been identified as the aircraft that rendered an Egyptian cleric known as Abu Omar after CIA agents kidnapped him in broad daylight in Milan in February 2003 and took him to Cairo, where he says he was tortured. Another invoice, for $301,113 relating to a series of flights over eight days that took the Gulfstream jet on an odyssey through Alaska, Japan, Thailand, Afghanistan and Sri Lanka, tallies with the rendition of Encep Nuraman, the leader of the Indonesian terrorist organisation Jemaah Islamiyah, better known as Hambali. Other invoices follow flights that appear to have been involved in the rendition of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the man said to have masterminded the 9/11 attacks. After being captured in 2003, Mohammed disappeared into the CIA’s secret prisons, where he was waterboarded 183 times in just one month, according to a US justice department memo. The invoices also show the aircraft flying in and out of Bucharest, where one of the CIA’s secret prisons is now known to have been located. On one occasion, the court heard, the jet flew direct from a European airport to Guantánamo. The court heard that in October 2004 the aircraft’s tail number was changed, to N227SV, after the US government discovered that its movements were being tracked. The following March the aircraft was publicly linked to the Abu Omar rendition. The documents were discovered by staff at the legal charity Reprieve. Its legal director, Cori Crider, said: “These documents reveal how the CIA’s secret network of torture sites was able to operate unchecked for so many years. They also reveal what a farce it was that the CIA managed to get the prisoners’ torture claims kicked out as secret, while all of the details of its sinister business were hiding in plain sight.” Richmor was providing the aircraft for DynCorp, a private military company, which was acting on behalf of the CIA. The bills for the operation passed through Sportsflight and a second aircraft broker, Capital Aviation. Portions of DynCorp were sold by its parent company in 2005. The entity that was sold became known as DynCorp International. The aircraft’s ultimate owner was Phillip Morse, an American businessman with substantial sporting interests who was subsequently appointed vice-chairman of Fenway Sports Group, the company that owns Liverpool FC. In between rendition flights the aircraft was used to fly the Boston Red Sox baseball team. The court documents make only passing reference to the human cargo being transported. Enough details of the rendition programme generally have now been disclosed to know that men on these flights were usually sedated through anal suppositories before being dressed in nappies and orange boiler suits, then hooded and muffled and trussed up in the back of the aircraft. The precise conditions in which suspects were transported on Richmor flights are not known. Richmor’s president, Mahlon Richards, told the court that the aircraft carried “government personnel and their invitees” . “Invitees?” queried the judge, Paul Czajka. “Invitees,” confirmed Richards. They were being flown across the world because the US government believed them to be “bad guys”, he said. Richmor performed well, Richards added. “We were complimented all the time.” “By the invitees?” asked the judge. “Not the invitees, the government.” CIA rendition Torture CIA United States Ian Cobain Ben Quinn guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Click here to view this media After watching the ever widening list of potential 2012 Republican presidential candidates, and hearing that former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani may again consider throwing his hat into that ring, Lawrence O’Donnell on MSNBC’s Last Word proceeded to shred Giuliani for his handling of the crisis on 9/11 and went after the BIG LIE on what happened that day. Counter to our media’s general narrative on the topic, Giuliani actually cost the lives of firefighters with his mismanagement of the disaster. O’Donnell noted Wayne Barrett’s article on the topic and was pretty well reading from part of it. There’s a whole lot more there, so go read the rest, but here’s part of the article on BIG LIE number two that O’Donnell discussed during the segment in the video above. Rudy Giuliani’s Five Big Lies About 9/11 : BIG LIE 2. ‘I don’t think there was anyplace in the country, including the federal government, that was as well prepared for that attack as New York City was in 2001.’ This assertion flies in the face of all three studies of the city’s response—the 9/11 Commission, the National Institute of Standards & Technology (NIST), and McKinsey & Co., the consulting firm hired by the Bloomberg administration. Actually, Giuliani didn’t create the OEM until three years after the 1993 bombing, 27 months into his term. And he didn’t open the OEM’s new emergency command center until the end of 1999—nearly six years after he’d taken office. If he “assumed from the moment I came into office that NYC would be the subject of a terrorist attack,” as he told Time when it made him “Person of the Year” in 2001, he sure took a long time to erect what he describes as the city’s front line of defense. The OEM was established so long after the bombing because, contrary to Giuliani’s revisionism, the decision to create it had nothing to do with the bombing. Several memos, unearthed from the Giuliani archive and going on at great length, reveal that the initial rationale for the agency was “non-law enforcement events,” particularly the handling of a Brooklyn water-main break shortly after he took office that the mayor thought had been botched. Before that, in December 1994, when an unemployed computer programmer carried a bomb onto a subway in an extortion plot against the Transit Authority, Giuliani was upset that he couldn’t even get a count of patients from the responding services for his press conference. Jerry Hauer, who was handpicked by Giuliani to head the OEM, testified before the 9/11 Commission that Giuliani was “unable to get the full story” at the firebombing and “heard about the huge street collapse” that followed the water-main break “on TV,” adding: “That’s what led the mayor to set up OEM.” Hauer went through five interviews for the job, and the only time terrorism came up was when Giuliani briefly discussed the failed sarin-gas drill. He even met with Giuliani’s wife, Donna Hanover ; no one said a word about the 1993 bombing. Hauer’s own memos at the time the OEM was launched in 1996 emphasize “the visibility of the mayor” during emergencies (rather than the police commissioner) as a major objective of the agency. The now- ballyhooed new office was, however, so underfunded from the start that Hauer could only hire staffers whose salaries would be paid for by other agencies like the NYPD. With that kind of history, it’s hardly surprising that the OEM was anything but “invaluable” on 9/11. Sam Caspersen , one of the principal authors of the 9/11 Commission’s chapter on the city’s response, says that “nothing was happening at OEM” during the 102 minutes of the attack that had any direct impact on the city’s “rescue/evacuation operation.” A commission staff statement found that, even prior to the evacuation of the OEM command center at 7 World Trade an hour after the first plane hit, the agency “did not play an integral role” in the response. Despite Giuliani’s claim today that he and the OEM were “constantly planning for different kinds” of attacks, none of the OEM exercises replicated the 1993 bombing. No drill occurred at the World Trade Center, and none involved the response to a high-rise fire anywhere. In fact, the OEM had no high-rise plan—its emergency-management trainers weren’t even assigned to prepare for the one attack that had already occurred, and the one most likely to recur. Kevin Culley , a Fire Department captain who worked as a field responder at OEM, said the agency had “plans for minor emergencies,” but he couldn’t recall “anybody anticipating another attack like the ’93 bombing.” Instead of being the best-prepared city, New York’s lack of unified command, as well as the breakdown of communications between the police and fire departments, fell far short of the efforts at the Pentagon that day, as later established by the 9/11 Commission and NIST reports. When the 280,000-member International Association of Fire Fighters recently released a powerful video assailing Giuliani for sticking firefighters with the same radios that “we knew didn’t work” in the 1993 attack, the presidential campaign attacked the union. “This is an organization that supported John Kerry for president in 2004,” Giuliani aide Tony Carbonetti said. “So it’s no shock that they’re out there going after a credible Republican.” While the IAFF did endorse Kerry, the Uniformed Firefighters of Greater New York, whose president starred in the video, endorsed Bush. Its former president, Tom Von Essen —currently a member of Giuliani Partners —was the fire commissioner on 9/11 precisely because the union had played such a pivotal role in initially electing Giuliani. The IAFF video reports that 121 firefighters in the north tower didn’t get out because they didn’t hear evacuation orders, rejecting Giuliani’s claim before the 9/11 Commission that the firefighters heard the orders and heroically decided to “stand their ground” and rescue civilians. Having abandoned that 2004 contention, the Giuliani campaign is now trying to blame the deadly communications lapse on the repeaters, which were installed to boost radio signals in the towers. But the commission concluded that the “technical failure of FDNY radios” was “a contributing factor,” though “not the primary cause,” of the “many firefighter fatalities in the North Tower.” The commission compared “the strength” of the NYPD and FDNY radios and said that the weaknesses of the FDNY radios “worked against successful communication.” The commission report also found that “it’s impossible to know what difference it made that units in the North Tower weren’t using the repeater channel,” because no one knows if it “remained operational” after the collapse of the south tower, which fell on the trade-center facilities where the repeater and its console were located. The collapse also drove everyone out of the north tower lobby, leaving no one to operate the repeater console. In addition, the commission concluded that fire chiefs failed to turn on the repeater correctly that morning—another indication of the lack of training and drills at the WTC between the attacks. In the end, firefighters had to rely exclusively on their radios, and the inability of the Giuliani administration to find a replacement for the radios that malfunctioned in 1993 left them unable to talk to each other, even about getting out of a tower on the verge of collapse.
Continue reading …• Check out part one and part two of our deadline day coverage • Keep up to date with the Guardian Sport Twitter account • Email paolo.bandini@guardian.co.uk or Tweet @Paolo_Bandini • Joe Cole joins Lille on season-long loan • Tottenham seal £6m deal for West Ham’s Scott Parker • All today’s completed deadline day deals 8.35pm: And while we’re doing the Twitter thing, here’s @JmsDmnd explaining Leicester’s late notice business. “Leaving it late because they are desperate for a striker and were pinning their hopes on Nicky Maynard (staying put),” he says. 8.31pm: Top football finances blogger Swiss Ramble is at his wits’ end on Twitter. “I’ve been racking my brains trying to work out Arsenal’s strategy this summer,” he tweets. “But have come to the unhappy conclusion that there isn’t one. 8.30pm: Royston Drenthe is on Merseyside and still trying to sort out his loan from Real Madrid to Everton. Which he seems to have been doing for a little while to be honest. 8.27pm: OK, but seriously – who waits until now to place a bid for a player? Sky reporting now that Leicester might be about to make a fresh approach for the striker Nikica Jelavic, having already had a £6.5m offer turned down. How does this happen? If you wanted him that badly, couldn’t you have thought about it at, say, breakfast time? Or even mid-afternoon? Is this just an idle dinner conversation that got out of hand? 8.25pm: I’m hearing that Bolton have now officially completed the signing of David Ngog from Liverpool. 8.20pm: At what point do we start to say that this actually just hasn’t been a particularly exciting transfer deadline day? 8.16pm: My spies in Portugal tell me that FC Porto have stolen a march in the battle (nay, global conflict) to sign Nicklas Bendtner “Portuguese media have just reported that Bendtner is in route to FC Porto for €12m,” says Mário Guerreiro. “And that the Alvaro Pereira’s move to Chelsea could still be a possibility, as Chelsea have now offered Lukaku in exchange.” Mário even provided a link, for those who speak Portuguese . 8.14pm: Jim White is literally on the phone as he bellows to us that Shaun Wright-Phillips’s move to QPR is now good to go ahead after he cleared up some loose ends with Manchester City. Seriously – on the phone! Is he talking to us or the person on the other end of the line? We may never know. 8.10pm: “Sky have gone with a relative unknown alongside their big gun Jim White,” reckons Pete Marland. “He’s got off to a shaky start, stumbling over done words. But I am expecting him to pick up the pace as the evening goes on. Still it is a big call to pair him with one of the lesser known female SSN presenters.” Hang on a sweet second there Pete – Natalie Sawyer is anything but an unknown to those of us who have this channel on in our office 24 hours a day. She’s an experienced veteran. He did stumble over his words though. 8.08pm: Newcastle fans! You didn’t think that your club was really going to sit there and watch the interest accrue on that Andy Carroll money while failing to address their glaring need up front did you? Never! Apparently Mike Ashley’s people are right this minute attempting to hijack Fulham’s bid for the FC Twente forward Bryan Ruiz. And according to Sky, they’ve got a half-decent chance. 8.03pm: Andy Hunter is on fire. “Wigan have followed up the signing of Shaun Maloney by taking Patrick Van Aaanholt on a season long loan from Chelsea,” he reports. “Roberto Martinez’s work with Tom Cleverley last season has not gone unnoticed.” 8pm: He’s here! He’s actually, really here! Sky Sports News Silver Fox Jim White is at his seat and ready for the next three, glorious hours. The channel has been previewing his arrival in the studio since some time last year, so I’m expecting literal fireworks, allied with insights that would make the messiah weep with envy. 7.59pm: And now here’s some news from north of the border from Ewan Murray: “Celtic will sign Moroccan left-back Badr el kaddouri on loan for six months.” 7.58pm: Our man in the north-west, Andy Hunter, reports that “Everton are pushing ahead with the signing of Royston Drenthe from Real Madrid despite Mikel Arteta’s move to Arsenal falling through.” 7.55pm: The word on the street (well, the internet) is that QPR may be preparing a late move for Nicklas Bendtner. Am I the only one who thinks it would make more sense for Arsenal – given the modest additions made so far – to keep hold? 7.51pm: Sky Man at Stoke has it “on good authority” that they have opened discussions with Manchester City over the possibility of signing Adam Johnson on loan. But, as he points out, they still have deals for Peter Crouch and Cameron Jerome to tie up. Can they get all the paperwork sorted in time? 7.50pm: An update from our man in the north-east this afternoon, Ewan Murray: Both north east clubs remain desperate for strikers… Sunderland now turning their attention to possible loan move for Chelsea’s Daniel Sturridge. Despite earlier conflicting evidence surrounding Gyan, there remains every chance he will leave the Stadium of Light for France or Turkey, should the opportunity arise. Newcastle, meanwhile, have moved for Twente’s Bryan Ruiz, who was last spotted in talks with Fulham…. 7.47pm: Owen Hargreaves has signed a one year contract at Manchester City. In my opinion, and those of most guardian.co.uk readers , a gamble worth taking. 7.45pm: Just 15 minutes to Jim White on Sky Sports News. It’s the big name arrival we’ve all been waiting for. 7.44pm: One suspects this email from Stewart Pearce is indicative: “The real buzz amongst Arsenal fans this morning that we might see a signing along the lines of M’Villa, Vargas, Hazard or Martin. Now to hear that “all efforts” are being put into capturing benayoun on loan really is a smack in the teeth. I expect Man City et al are quaking in their boots.” 7.40pm: As I noted in my last entry on the previous blog, Arsenal’s proposed deal for Mikel Arteta has collapsed, and they are now placing all of their eggs in the Yossi Benayoun loan basket. Meantime, Hull’s Jamie Devitt has joined Bradford on loan. 7.32pm: OK folks, sorry about that – technical gremlins have forced us to move to a new location. So, what did I miss? 7.30pm: Welcome back to our live coverage of transfer deadline day. What you’ve missed from part one and part two of our live blog: • Liverpool midfielder Joe Cole joins Lille on season-long loan deal. • Scott Parker completes £6m switch to Tottenham from West Ham. • Arsenal complete deal for Fenerbahce defender André Santos. • Sunderland’s Anton Ferdinand set for medical at QPR; Stoke agree fee with Birmingham for Cameron Jerome; Liverpool midfielder Christian Poulsen signs for Evian. Transfer window Paolo Bandini guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Wiltshire town holds sunset ceremony before mourning of war dead moves to Carterton in Oxfordshire The pattern was a familiar one. The bikers turned up first and parked next to the war memorial. Regulars who had travelled from far afield grabbed a cup of tea and a sandwich before making sure of their places. The locals came last, arriving by car, foot and mobility scooter to take part in a ceremony to mark the passing on of a sad honour. As the sun set on Wootton Bassett, the Wiltshire town that, over the past four years, has become a focus for the nation’s grief at the loss of the lives of service personnel in Iraq and Afghanistan, the union flag fluttering next to the war memorial was lowered. It was carefully folded and left overnight on the altar of St Bartholomew’s church before being handed over to the people of Carterton across the border in Oxfordshire, the town which will, from now on, bear witness to the return of coffins carrying men and women killed while on active service abroad. “I’m sure the people of Carterton will do them proud,” said Ken Scott, 95, who made it his job to collect and preserve the messages, cards and photographs left at the memorial by bereaved families and friends. “It doesn’t matter whether they come back through Wootton Bassett or wherever. What does matter is that those poor boys and girls are honoured.” Since 2007, the bodies of service personnel have been repatriated via RAF Lyneham and taken on to a hospital in Oxford via Wootton Bassett’s high street. To honour the dead, the people of Bassett, as everyone here calls it, took to pausing in their everyday life when a cortege passed. Over the months and years they were joined by an ever-growing number of bereaved families, veterans’ groups and ordinary people (including a fair few leather-clad bikers), some of whom travelled many miles to pay tribute. By 2009, at the height of the conflict in Afghanistan , thousands of people were lining the streets of this modest little town. Lyneham is closing – the coincidence of more RAF and army job losses being announced was not lost – and a new repatriation centre has been opened at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire, along with a memorial garden in Carterton where that union flag will be hoisted. David Cameron led the praise for Wootton Bassett, sending a “heartfelt thank you” to its people. “I think they have done a magnificent job. What happened at Wootton Bassett was spontaneous. It was a very beautiful thing,” said the prime minister. The Wootton Bassett phenomenon has been extraordinary. It began almost by chance when a former mayor, Percy Miles, was out shopping with his wife in the spring of 2007. Someone from the town council ran out to tell him that a cortege was coming through. Nothing had been planned but he dashed home, put on his mayoral robes and stood to attention as the body was driven through. “I was amazed it became such a huge thing. Bassett has done wonders over the years,” said Miles. “I didn’t go to all of them because it hurt too much and I won’t go to Brize Norton for the same reason. I get too emotional. I feel strongly we shouldn’t be out in Afghanistan in the first place.” Everyone has their own vivid memories of repatriations. Kevin Dunn, a window cleaner from Swindon, has only missed five of the 167 repatriations (comprising 345 men and women as many involved more than one body). He recalls in particular the return of a Fijian soldier’s body. “His whole village was there by the town hall, it seemed. They sang from 9am to 5pm without stopping for a drink or food – amazing.” Wiltshire councillor Allison Bucknell remembers watching a group of young men mourning one of their friends. “They didn’t know what to do with their grief. I just walked over with a packet of tissues and handed it to them. I didn’t know how else to help. I was a soggy mess myself afterwards,” she said. Wootton Bassett’s current mayor, Paul Heaphy, admits there was a fear that the “repat days” had become too big. “In 2009, when casualties were coming back in horrific numbers, the world’s media caught hold of it and we were accused of being ghoulish and turning the whole thing into a circus,” he said. “But it was always just about paying respect to the fallen and giving the families the support we could.” There was also a time when some people were uneasy about the very public expressions of grief shown by some bereaved families. It became common for flowers to be thrown on to hearses and for the corteges to be applauded as they passed. But the Wootton Bassett residents never tried to stop the public outpourings. Bereaved families were grateful and many joined the prime minister to pay tribute. Terry Burgan, whose son Lance Sergeant Mark Burgan was killed earlier this year and repatriated through Wootton Bassett, said: “It was a fantastic day. The welcome we got was overwhelming.” Former paratrooper Dave Soane said: “I think it was great that families, media, the armed services, local people were all in the same place mixing together. It’s as if barriers were broken down and that’s got to be a good thing.” The final repatriation took place on August 18 when the town marked the return of the body of 24-year-old Daniel Clack, who was killed by a roadside bomb in Helmand. Most of those at the sunset ceremony expressed mixed emotions – pride at what Wootton Bassett had achieved, sadness that it would no longer be able to offer the support it has – and some relief that the baton had been passed on. The town council will now begin planning for one last set piece event when it is accorded royal status in October. The honour, bestowed in March, was, according to Cameron, “an enduring symbol of the nation’s admiration and our gratitude to the people of that town”. After the naming ceremony, most in the town hope to bow out of the public spotlight. Canon Thomas Woodhouse, vicar of Wootton Bassett, said he felt now was time to reflect – which had not always been easy to do when repatriation after repatriation was coming through. “This is an ending of part our history,” he said. “Now we’re looking forward to getting on with the rest of our history.” Military Afghanistan Steven Morris guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Wiltshire town holds sunset ceremony before mourning of war dead moves to Carterton in Oxfordshire The pattern was a familiar one. The bikers turned up first and parked next to the war memorial. Regulars who had travelled from far afield grabbed a cup of tea and a sandwich before making sure of their places. The locals came last, arriving by car, foot and mobility scooter to take part in a ceremony to mark the passing on of a sad honour. As the sun set on Wootton Bassett, the Wiltshire town that, over the past four years, has become a focus for the nation’s grief at the loss of the lives of service personnel in Iraq and Afghanistan, the union flag fluttering next to the war memorial was lowered. It was carefully folded and left overnight on the altar of St Bartholomew’s church before being handed over to the people of Carterton across the border in Oxfordshire, the town which will, from now on, bear witness to the return of coffins carrying men and women killed while on active service abroad. “I’m sure the people of Carterton will do them proud,” said Ken Scott, 95, who made it his job to collect and preserve the messages, cards and photographs left at the memorial by bereaved families and friends. “It doesn’t matter whether they come back through Wootton Bassett or wherever. What does matter is that those poor boys and girls are honoured.” Since 2007, the bodies of service personnel have been repatriated via RAF Lyneham and taken on to a hospital in Oxford via Wootton Bassett’s high street. To honour the dead, the people of Bassett, as everyone here calls it, took to pausing in their everyday life when a cortege passed. Over the months and years they were joined by an ever-growing number of bereaved families, veterans’ groups and ordinary people (including a fair few leather-clad bikers), some of whom travelled many miles to pay tribute. By 2009, at the height of the conflict in Afghanistan , thousands of people were lining the streets of this modest little town. Lyneham is closing – the coincidence of more RAF and army job losses being announced was not lost – and a new repatriation centre has been opened at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire, along with a memorial garden in Carterton where that union flag will be hoisted. David Cameron led the praise for Wootton Bassett, sending a “heartfelt thank you” to its people. “I think they have done a magnificent job. What happened at Wootton Bassett was spontaneous. It was a very beautiful thing,” said the prime minister. The Wootton Bassett phenomenon has been extraordinary. It began almost by chance when a former mayor, Percy Miles, was out shopping with his wife in the spring of 2007. Someone from the town council ran out to tell him that a cortege was coming through. Nothing had been planned but he dashed home, put on his mayoral robes and stood to attention as the body was driven through. “I was amazed it became such a huge thing. Bassett has done wonders over the years,” said Miles. “I didn’t go to all of them because it hurt too much and I won’t go to Brize Norton for the same reason. I get too emotional. I feel strongly we shouldn’t be out in Afghanistan in the first place.” Everyone has their own vivid memories of repatriations. Kevin Dunn, a window cleaner from Swindon, has only missed five of the 167 repatriations (comprising 345 men and women as many involved more than one body). He recalls in particular the return of a Fijian soldier’s body. “His whole village was there by the town hall, it seemed. They sang from 9am to 5pm without stopping for a drink or food – amazing.” Wiltshire councillor Allison Bucknell remembers watching a group of young men mourning one of their friends. “They didn’t know what to do with their grief. I just walked over with a packet of tissues and handed it to them. I didn’t know how else to help. I was a soggy mess myself afterwards,” she said. Wootton Bassett’s current mayor, Paul Heaphy, admits there was a fear that the “repat days” had become too big. “In 2009, when casualties were coming back in horrific numbers, the world’s media caught hold of it and we were accused of being ghoulish and turning the whole thing into a circus,” he said. “But it was always just about paying respect to the fallen and giving the families the support we could.” There was also a time when some people were uneasy about the very public expressions of grief shown by some bereaved families. It became common for flowers to be thrown on to hearses and for the corteges to be applauded as they passed. But the Wootton Bassett residents never tried to stop the public outpourings. Bereaved families were grateful and many joined the prime minister to pay tribute. Terry Burgan, whose son Lance Sergeant Mark Burgan was killed earlier this year and repatriated through Wootton Bassett, said: “It was a fantastic day. The welcome we got was overwhelming.” Former paratrooper Dave Soane said: “I think it was great that families, media, the armed services, local people were all in the same place mixing together. It’s as if barriers were broken down and that’s got to be a good thing.” The final repatriation took place on August 18 when the town marked the return of the body of 24-year-old Daniel Clack, who was killed by a roadside bomb in Helmand. Most of those at the sunset ceremony expressed mixed emotions – pride at what Wootton Bassett had achieved, sadness that it would no longer be able to offer the support it has – and some relief that the baton had been passed on. The town council will now begin planning for one last set piece event when it is accorded royal status in October. The honour, bestowed in March, was, according to Cameron, “an enduring symbol of the nation’s admiration and our gratitude to the people of that town”. After the naming ceremony, most in the town hope to bow out of the public spotlight. Canon Thomas Woodhouse, vicar of Wootton Bassett, said he felt now was time to reflect – which had not always been easy to do when repatriation after repatriation was coming through. “This is an ending of part our history,” he said. “Now we’re looking forward to getting on with the rest of our history.” Military Afghanistan Steven Morris guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …