Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 348)
Feminist WaPo Film Critic Slams Palin Documentary, Especially Mark Levin

It shouldn't be shocking that a film critic who pens tributes to the joyful figure that was radical feminist Bella Abzug would not be a fan of Sarah Palin, or Steve Bannon's Palin documentary The Undefeated. Washington Post film critic Ann Hornaday

Continue reading …
Southampton defender Dan Seaborne in hospital with life threatening condition

• Southampton defender in life threatening condition • Dan Seaborne found with serious head injuries Southampton defender, Dan Seaborne, has been rushed to hospital in a potentially life threatening condition. It has been reported that the 24 year-old was found lying outside one of the city’s nightclubs with serious head injuries. It is believed that Seaborne had been inside the nightclub on London Road earlier in the evening. Seaborne was treated at the scene by paramedics before being taken to Southampton General Hospital. Hampshire Police have encouraged anyone who was in the nightclub on Thursday night, or anyone who was on London Road and witnessed what happened, to come forward. Seaborne signed for Southampton from Exeter City in January 2010 for a fee of £250,000. He has since made 43 appearances for the Saints, and was a pivotal figure in last season’s promotion to the Championship. Southampton guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Turkey agrees to host missile early warning radar for Nato

The radar is part of an anti-missile defence system aimed at countering threats from Turkey’s neighbour Iran Turkey has agreed to host an early warning radar as part of Nato’s missile defence system aimed at countering ballistic missile threats from neighbouring Iran. A Turkish foreign ministry statement said discussions on the country’s contribution to Nato’s missile defence shield had reached “their final stages”. It did not say when or where the US early warning radar would be stationed. Nato members agreed to an anti-missile system over Europe to protect against Iranian ballistic missiles at a summit in Lisbon last year. A compromise was reached with Turkey, which has cultivated close ties with its neighbour Iran and had threatened to block the deal if Iran were explicitly named as a threat. Under the Nato plans, a limited system of US anti-missile interceptors and radars already planned for Europe – to include interceptors in Romania and Poland as well as the radar in Turkey – would be linked to European-owned missile defences. That would create a broad system that protected every Nato country against medium-range missile attacks. Turkey has built close economic ties with Iran and has been at odds with the US on its stance towards Iran’s nuclear programme, arguing for a diplomatic solution to the standoff instead of sanctions. But the agreement over hosting the radar comes at a time when Turkey and Iran appear to be differing on their approach towards Syria, with Turkey becoming increasingly critical of the country’s brutal suppression of anti-regime protests. The ministry statement made no mention of Iran. It said the system would strengthen both Nato and Turkey’s own defence capacities. Russia opposes the planned system, which it worries could threaten its own nuclear missiles or undermine their deterrence capability. Russia agreed to consider a Nato proposal last year to co-operate on the missile shield, but insisted the system be run jointly. Nato rejected that demand and no compromise has been found yet. Turkey Nato Iran Middle East United States Europe guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
David Cameron: Tony Blair was wrong about the riots

The prime minister sticks to his claim that last month’s riots were part of a widespread ‘moral collapse’ in society David Cameron has dismissed Tony Blair’s claim that it was wrong to portray the riots in England as evidence of a widespread “moral collapse” afflicting society. In an interview on the Today programme, the prime minister said the fact that bystanders got involved in looting meant that rioting was not simply caused by members of a “criminal underclass”. Cameron insisted that his approach to the problems at the root of this moral breakdown could best be summed up by the term “tough love”. And, in response to reports that Labour are planning to depict him as a rightwinger, he said that he was best defined as a “commonsense Conservative”. In August, Cameron gave a speech in which he said the riots illustrated “the slow-motion moral collapse that has taken place in parts of our country these past few generations”. This prompted a rare intervention from Tony Blair in domestic politics, when the former Labour prime minister used an article in the Observer to argue that Britain “as a whole” was not “in the grip of some general ‘moral decline’” and that the rioting was only caused by a select minority. In his interview, Cameron rejected the Blair argument and defended his decision to talk about a larger moral collapse. “In the riots there was clearly a hardcore of people who were just breaking the law and had no sense of right and wrong or moral boundaries,” he said. “But, tragically, we also saw people who were drawn into it, who passed the broken shop window and popped in and nicked a telly. And that is a sign of actual moral collapse, of failing to recognise the difference between right and wrong. So I don’t think you can simply say this is just a criminal underclass and no other problem at all. I think it does go broader than that.” Cameron also indicated that he was wary of linking the rioting to the lack of responsibility in other professions, such as banking. There was a problem with lack of responsibility in banking that needed to be addressed, he said. But, in an apparent reference to Ed Miliband, who has made an explicit connection between the riots and lack of responsibility at the top of society, he went on: “What I think we shouldn’t do is say, as some seem to on the left: ‘Well, we can’t really do anything about the problem of the riots and criminality that we saw until we have dealt with selfishness and greed elsewhere.’ “I think there’s a slight tendency of some to say, until you can fix everything, fix nothing. The fact is, we should be fixing all of these things.” Cameron said he agreed with the comment made by Boris Johnson, the mayor of London, who said that people were not stealing from shops because Gerald Kaufman claimed for a flatscreen TV on his parliamentary expenses. The prime minister also reaffirmed the commitment he made in his speech last month to turn around the lives of 120,000 troubled families by 2015. He refused to confirm a suggestion that this would cost £2.5bn, but he said the government would be revealing details later about how the programme would be funded. The government was already spending money on these families, he said, because they had a “huge number” of contacts with state agencies. But no one was working with them properly to address their problems. “The point is, this will save a fortune,” Cameron said. More importantly, early intervention of this kind would also “save a lot of lives that otherwise would go to hell in handcart”. Asked about reports that the Labour party are planning to attack Cameron on the grounds that he is a conventional, rightwing Conservative, Cameron said: “I’m just a commonsense Conservative. I believe you do what fits with your instincts and principles and what you feel is right.” He also said that he would sum up his approach with the two words “tough love”. He went on: “You need both elements of it. For some of these children who ended up in this terrible situation, there probably was a shortage of not just respect and boundaries, but also love. But you do need, when they cross the line and break the law, to be very tough. So, to me, tough love sums it up.” Others in the government believed this too, he said, and ministers would be using this approach to rebuild society. Cameron also dismissed a suggestion from the interviewer, Evan Davis, that there was a similarity between the antics of the rioters and members of the Bullingdon club, the aristocratic club to which Cameron belonged when he was at Oxford which was notorious for rowdy, drunken behaviour. Cameron said: “We all do stupid things when we’re young and we should learn the lessons.” Asked if, when he was a member of the Bullingdon club, he witnessed people throwing things through windows or smashing up restaurants, Cameron replied: “No, I didn’t.” Seeming embarrassed by the question, Cameron went on: “As I say, we all do stupid things when we’re young. And I think that’s clear. But I think what we saw in terms of the riots was actually very well organised, in many cases, looting and stealing and thieving.” In his Observer article Blair said the riots were caused by the existence of a group of “young, alienated, disaffected youth who are outside the social mainstream and who live in a culture at odds with any canons of proper behaviour”. There was a group like this in almost every developed nation, Blair said. “Many of these people are from families that are profoundly dysfunctional, operating on completely different terms from the rest of society, middle-class or poor.” Lord Heseltine, the Conservative former deputy prime minister, also made a similar argument in an article published in the Times a few days after Blair’s intervention. Heseltine said that mainstream society was not broken. But in parts of urban England there was also an alternative society, “much smaller but with a different set of assumptions”. This society “accepts a very different set of standards to those supported by the majority of us,” he said. David Cameron UK riots Tony Blair Andrew Sparrow guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Libya intervention: British forces played key role, says Cameron

Prime minister suggests further military actions may lie ahead as Arab League members ‘toughen stance’ against Syria David Cameron has said “armchair generals” who criticised the government’s strategy in Libya had been proved wrong as he hailed Britain’s role in the intervention as “very significant”. The prime minister insisted Britain would remain a “full-spectrum player” in the future, despite defence cuts, and signalled further interventions may lie ahead as he revealed that some members of the Arab League were “toughening their stance” over the situation in Syria. Cameron was speaking after co-chairing a major international summit to build support for the fledgling rebel administration. Libya’s new leaders presented themselves to the Paris summit, promising a swift transition to democracy after six months of Nato-backed revolution and asking for immediate UN support in organising elections. Speaking on BBC Radio 4′s Today programme, Cameron said Britain had played “a very important role” in the intervention. “A lot of armchair generals who said ‘you couldn’t do it without an aircraft carrier’ – they were wrong, and a lot of people said that Tripoli was completely different to Benghazi and that the two don’t get on – they were wrong. “People who said ‘this is all going to be an enormous swamp of Islamists and extremists’ – they were wrong. People who said we were going to run out of munitions – they were wrong. I think we should be proud of what our forces did.” Cameron said there were “lots of lessons to learn” from the conflict in Libya, and that the government would “take our time learning them”. Support for the revolution was justified and in the UK’s national interest, he said. There had been “a moral imperative” to intervene to stop a slaughter in Benghazi and the Libyan rebels’ success would allow the Arab spring to continue. “Gaddafi was a monster. He was responsible for appalling crimes, including crimes in this country and I think the world will be much better off without him,” he said. Despite trumpeting Britain’s role, Cameron said there was a danger of people in the west “taking too much credit for themselves” for what was really a Libyan triumph. He said: “This is the Libyan people who have rid themselves of a dictator, and they have suffered appalling loss of life from some very brave actions. This is important, because I think one of the reasons why Tripoli is getting itself back together again in relatively good order is because it wasn’t a foreign force that knocked over Gaddafi’s regime, the Libyans did it themselves. This wasn’t done too them – they did it, and so they are rapidly mending it.” On the lack of intervention in Syria, despite the parallel situation of a dictator doing “dreadful things to his people”, he said Britain had “been in the vanguard in arguing for a tougher approach”, and that President Assad should stand aside. But, he said, the circumstances were different because there wasn’t the same backing either in the Arab League or internationally, though he said there were signs that members of the Arab League were beginning to take a harder stance against Bashar al-Assad’s regime. On Britain’s stance, he said: “We have argued for travel bans, asset freezes and for sanctions and a tough approach to this regime. I had good conversations with some members of the Arab League last night in Paris and they are toughening their stance as they realise that what they are doing is appalling. They realise he [Assad] had his chance to demonstrate he was in favour of reform and he has failed to do that.” On Britain’s defence capabilities in light of an 8% cut in budgets, Cameron insisted Britain had “punched its weight, even above its weight” in the number of sorties over Libya. British forces had “not suffered” from not having an aircraft carrier as a result of decisions made in the strategic defence review, he said, pointing to “basing” abilities in the Mediterranean for Typhoon and Tornado aircraft flying over Libyan skies. The prime minister challenged House of Commons library figures that suggested Britain had performed just 10% of all strike sorties, saying the figure was twice that. “There were somewhere just less than 8,000 sorties,” he insisted. “Britain performed 1,600 of those, so around a fifth of strike sorties. That is punching at our weight or even above our weight. We played a very important role, not just in the number of strike sorties but also in the fact that we were there right from the beginning. “It was Britain and France with America that called time on Gaddafi and said that we were not going to allow a slaughter in Benghazi.” Libya Arab and Middle East unrest Military Defence policy Syria Middle East Africa Hélène Mulholland guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Laura Marling interview: ‘I’ve got the confidence now’

At just 21, folk star Laura Marling is already three albums into a career built on furious talent and untempered ambition. She talks to Laura Barton about her new album A Creature I Don’t Know Laura Marling sits at her kitchen counter, small and pale in an Iron Maiden T-shirt, and smokes a cigarette in the mid-morning sunshine. The pack of Camels, the heavy metal shirt – both seem to serve as gentle reminders that the darling of the British folk scene is perhaps not quite what you might expect; allusions to the fact that while, in person, she may appear poised and still and quietly reserved, in song, she is a different animal

Continue reading …
Child sex abuse convictions rise 60% in six years

Increase attributed to better detection and raised awareness, but child protection groups say it remains an under-reported crime The number of people convicted of sex offences on children under 16 in England and Wales has increased by nearly 60% in six years. The BBC said a freedom of information request to the Ministry of Justice found that 1,363 people were convicted in 2005, while in 2010 it was 2,135. The increase is being attributed to better detection and raised awareness, it said. Child protection groups say the number is relatively small and it remains an under-reported crime. The head of strategy and development at the NSPCC, Lisa Harker, said: “It’s difficult to tell if these figures indicate an increase in the number of sex offences being committed against children. “It may be that more people – adults and children – are becoming aware of abuse and so are reporting cases to the police and other authorities. “Nevertheless it’s still a relatively small number of convictions considering child sex abuse is a big problem.” The chief executive of the Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre, Peter Davies, said: “It is good news as it’s a good indicator that police services and others are getting their act together.” He said authorities did not use conviction numbers as a primary measure of success because it was an under-reported crime and hard to prosecute as there tended to be few witnesses. Child protection Children Crime guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
US authorities to sue big banks over sub-prime crisis

The agency overseeing the remains of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac seeks billions of dollars in compensation from banks including Bank of America, JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs US authorities are preparing to sue more than a dozen big banks over claims they misrepresented the quality of mortgages sold during the 2006-7 housing bubble. The US Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), which is overseeing the remains of failed mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, is reportedly planning to argue that America’s biggest banks failed to check the health of mortgages before they sold them on to investors. The collapse of hundreds of thousands of sub-prime mortgages triggered the 2008 credit crisis and the collapse of Fannie and Freddie. The New York Times said the FHFA is expected to file the lawsuit against the banks, including Bank of America, JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs and Deutsche Bank, as early as Friday. The agency, which is seeking billions of dollars in compensation, claims the banks failed to notice that borrowers were taking on mortgages that they could not afford. The FHFA lawsuit, which follows a subpoena issued to the banks last year, demands that the banks pay compensation to cover some of the $30bn ($18.5bn) Fannie and Freddie lost on mortgage-backed securities. Most of Fannie and Freddie’s losses were borne by US taxpayers after the government was forced to step in and bailout the pair to the tune of $141bn. It follows a similar $900m lawsuit filed against Swiss bank UBS in July. At the time UBS said it would “vigorously” defend all charges brought against it. In total the FHFA issued 64 subpoenas to the issuers and servicers of mortgage-backed securities last year. Last week the agency’s director, Edward DeMarco, who declined to discuss the pending lawsuit, said there were “more to come”. The banks declined to comment to the New York Times. Action by the FHFA comes as the US Federal Reserve announced a formal enforcement action against Goldman Sachs “to address a pattern of misconduct and negligence relating to deficient practices” in its handling of mortgage loans. The Fed said Goldman will be legally required to compensate any homeowners that were found to have been financially harmed by the alleged misconduct. It did not speculate on the size of the potential compensation claims. The Fed’s action is the latest step in the US government’s investigation of “robo-signing” – in which bank employees signed foreclosure documents without reviewing case files as required by law. The Fed said employees at Goldman’s Litton Loan Servicing unit engaged in robo-signing and took actions in foreclosure and bankruptcy cases “without always confirming that documentation of ownership was in order”. Separately, the New York State Banking Department announced that Goldman had agreed to write off $53m of the outstanding debts on about 150 mortgages it owned in New York. Accepting the writedown was a condition for allowing Goldman to sell Litton to Ocwen Financial in a $260m deal late on Thursday. US housing and sub-prime crisis US economy Financial crisis Banking Rupert Neate guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Pima County GOP: Gun Raffle Not Insensitive Because Shootings Were Loughner’s Fault

Click here to view this media Pima Country GOP Chairman Pro Tem Mike Shaw told CNN’s Randi Kaye Thursday that raffling off the same kind of gun that was used to shoot Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-AZ) was completely appropriate because the congresswoman also owned a similar weapon. “Arizona Republicans are fundraising by raffling off, get this, a Glock pistol,” Kaye noted. “It’s important to point out that it is the same kind of gun that was pointed at Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords’ head and used to shoot her point blank.” “Jared Loughner is accused of seriously wounding Gabrielle Giffords, killing six people, including a little girl and a federal judge with a Glock just like the one you’re raveling off, but considering what we know about the shooting rampage in Tucson which is the seat of Pima County, why raffle this Glock?” Kaye asked Shaw. “It was the actions of Jared Loughner that happened during the Tucson shooting so Jared was the one who was responsible,” Shaw explained. “He could have used any type of weapon and chose to use a Glock — I think it was a Glock 19. We’re raveling off a Glock 23, which is a slightly different weapon. But, again, it was his actions that are responsible for what happened during the Tucson shooting, and so really the argument about what happened here in Tucson shouldn’t be about the weapon.” “The founding fathers thought it was important that we would have rights in this country and a very important one is the right to keep and bear arms, one that Gabrielle Giffords believes in strongly herself,” he added. “Obviously not everybody who gets a Glock is going to do what Jared Loughner did, thankfully, but do you think that this might be considered just a bit insensitive to the congresswoman and the other family members involved?” Kaye pressed. “Well, we certainly did not,” Shaw insisted. “Again, it’s the actions of Jared Loughner that were taken that day. It was not the weapon that he used.” He continued: “I have a quote from of Giffords’ spokespeople in The Arizona Capitol Times March of 2008, when Congresswoman Giffords was standing against the gun ban in Washington, D.C., and the spokesman quotes saying, ‘Giffords owns a Glock handgun and regards gun ownership as a constitutional right and an Arizona tradition.’ And I really can’t say it any better than that.” “Aren’t you ever worried about somebody else doing something wrong with that weapon?” Kaye wondered. “Absolutely not. We have millions of gun owners in this country, law-abiding citizens. It was gun owners that kept Jared Loughner from reloading his weapon during the Tucson shooting,” Shaw replied. “I think we’ll have to agree to disagree on this one,” Kaye concluded. enlarge But not all Republicans think it’s such a good idea. “There’s a woman who has a bullet in the brain and who everybody is wishing a full recovery,” former Pima County GOP chair Brian Miller told Talking Points Memo . “I don’t think that raffling off a firearm right now is probably the right way to go.” GOP Legislative District 29 Chairman James Kelley agreed that the raffle was insensitive . “It doesn’t mean the Republican party doesn’t have an incredible record of supporting the Second Amendment, but at this point it’s ill-advised and I won’t stand with them on this,” he said.

Continue reading …
Pima County GOP: Gun Raffle Not Insensitive Because Shootings Were Loughner’s Fault

Click here to view this media Pima Country GOP Chairman Pro Tem Mike Shaw told CNN’s Randi Kaye Thursday that raffling off the same kind of gun that was used to shoot Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-AZ) was completely appropriate because the congresswoman also owned a similar weapon. “Arizona Republicans are fundraising by raffling off, get this, a Glock pistol,” Kaye noted. “It’s important to point out that it is the same kind of gun that was pointed at Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords’ head and used to shoot her point blank.” “Jared Loughner is accused of seriously wounding Gabrielle Giffords, killing six people, including a little girl and a federal judge with a Glock just like the one you’re raveling off, but considering what we know about the shooting rampage in Tucson which is the seat of Pima County, why raffle this Glock?” Kaye asked Shaw. “It was the actions of Jared Loughner that happened during the Tucson shooting so Jared was the one who was responsible,” Shaw explained. “He could have used any type of weapon and chose to use a Glock — I think it was a Glock 19. We’re raveling off a Glock 23, which is a slightly different weapon. But, again, it was his actions that are responsible for what happened during the Tucson shooting, and so really the argument about what happened here in Tucson shouldn’t be about the weapon.” “The founding fathers thought it was important that we would have rights in this country and a very important one is the right to keep and bear arms, one that Gabrielle Giffords believes in strongly herself,” he added. “Obviously not everybody who gets a Glock is going to do what Jared Loughner did, thankfully, but do you think that this might be considered just a bit insensitive to the congresswoman and the other family members involved?” Kaye pressed. “Well, we certainly did not,” Shaw insisted. “Again, it’s the actions of Jared Loughner that were taken that day. It was not the weapon that he used.” He continued: “I have a quote from of Giffords’ spokespeople in The Arizona Capitol Times March of 2008, when Congresswoman Giffords was standing against the gun ban in Washington, D.C., and the spokesman quotes saying, ‘Giffords owns a Glock handgun and regards gun ownership as a constitutional right and an Arizona tradition.’ And I really can’t say it any better than that.” “Aren’t you ever worried about somebody else doing something wrong with that weapon?” Kaye wondered. “Absolutely not. We have millions of gun owners in this country, law-abiding citizens. It was gun owners that kept Jared Loughner from reloading his weapon during the Tucson shooting,” Shaw replied. “I think we’ll have to agree to disagree on this one,” Kaye concluded. enlarge But not all Republicans think it’s such a good idea. “There’s a woman who has a bullet in the brain and who everybody is wishing a full recovery,” former Pima County GOP chair Brian Miller told Talking Points Memo . “I don’t think that raffling off a firearm right now is probably the right way to go.” GOP Legislative District 29 Chairman James Kelley agreed that the raffle was insensitive . “It doesn’t mean the Republican party doesn’t have an incredible record of supporting the Second Amendment, but at this point it’s ill-advised and I won’t stand with them on this,” he said.

Continue reading …