Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 335)
On This Week, Jim DeMint’s Nonsense Goes Unchallenged

Click here to view this media I watched This Week with Christiane Amanpour and I could swear she’s sleepwalking through this interview. Is there anything close to a pointed question here? Is there some reason this mush-mouthed faux “patriot,” this enemy of democracy, goes unchallenged? AMANPOUR: Yunji, thanks so much for being with us there in New Orleans and keeping an eye on that. Labor Day is the traditional kickoff of the campaign season, so get ready for a flurry of activity. There’s a debate on Wednesday. And tomorrow, the leading Republican presidential candidates take center stage at a South Carolina forum, hosted by the state’s powerful senator, Jim DeMint. Former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney was planning to skip the event, but he changed his mind when Rick Perry surged ahead in the polls. Senator DeMint, of course, is a major force behind the Tea Party movement. His endorsement is one of the major prizes of 2012. And he joins me now from Clemson, South Carolina. Senator, thank you for being with us. DEMINT: Christiane, it’s great to be with you. And we’re really looking forward to this forum, because it’s set up in a very different style. Instead of the typical debate, with lots of candidates on stage, each candidate gets to spend 21 minutes on the stage by themselves to define themselves in their own terms . So I think folks all over the country will find it very interesting. Translation: We’re not going to let anything happen like that last one, where Chris Wallace surprised us all by asking tough questions. Goddamnit, we’re Republicans, we’re supposed to protect each other! That’s why we came up with this beauty pageant format. AMANPOUR: Well, let me ask you then for your view on the latest entrant into the race, and that is Texas Governor Rick Perry. Earlier this summer, you said you didn’t know enough about him. Now can you tell me your views since he’s been in the race and there’s been a lot said by him over the last couple of weeks? DEMINT: Well, I’m excited about our field. I think the more people find out about the Republican candidates, the more strengths they see. I think that’s why a lot of people have hesitated to jump in. And it’s good to give people a choice. So I’m glad Governor Perry jumped in. But I’m going to withhold any endorsement or support for several months. It’s really important to me to see how these candidates respond to the big issues of the day. I want to see not only their policy proposals, particularly as it relates to jobs, but I want to see how they respond to recommendations from this super-committee and what Congress is doing towards balancing the budget and other issues like that. That’s going to play out over the next couple of months. But this forum’s going to be very helpful to me and others, because instead of forcing them to answer my questions, we are going to encourage them to define the issues on their own terms . This will give us a little bit deeper understanding on how they view the Constitution and their role as president. AMANPOUR: Senator, I know you want to withhold an endorsement, but I do want to press you, because Rick Perry is the front-runner at the moment. And I want to know — and particularly he’s quite beloved of the Tea Party movement, of which you’re a major force. What can you tell me? How do you feel, for instance, about his endorsement of Al Gore back in 1988, of his praising Hillary Clinton’s and the Clinton health care plan? What do you feel about those stances? DEMINT: Well, I want to find out more about him, obviously, but we know people change. Reagan was a Democrat. And I want to look at what the governor’s done as governor of Texas, just as I’m going to try to dig into a lot of the issues, past, present and future policy proposals of all the candidates. But I want to give them all a little room to change. I know I’ve changed some positions I had 10 years ago, because the country’s in a very different situation . So I’m going to listen and look and do my — do my homework. And I’m not counting any of them out at this point. Translation: I don’t care if we nominate a piece of lumber, I’m 100% behind them! AMANPOUR: What about Governor Perry’s stance on Social Security? In his book, which is now being pored over, as you can imagine, he basically called Social Security like a bad disease and a big failure. Do you think that is going to haunt him on the campaign trail? DEMINT: Well, I want to hear him explain his views on that. I’ve developed a lot of reform proposals myself and been accused of trying to destroy Social Security, when the whole point was to try to save it. I think most people know that Social Security is bankrupt. And I believe the governor probably feels as I do: We need to keep our promises to seniors and offer better choices to younger workers . But I want to hear him explain these things on his own terms. And so I think we’ll learn a lot about that and other issues on Monday. Lying old coot. Oops, did I just write that? It doesn’t matter who gets the nomination, they’re all going after Social Security. AMANPOUR: Well, just quickly to wrap up Governor Perry, do you like what you’ve seen so far? Is he the presumed front-runner for you? DEMINT: Well, there are things I certainly like, just like I do with all the candidates. Like I said before, I see some good things, some strengths in a lot of the candidates. And the ones — we’re having — we’ve got the top runners or the top tier there on Monday. So I’m not making any real judgments, but there are things I like about all of them. AMANPOUR: Now, you’re being very cagey, Senator. Let me ask you about Governor Mitt Romney, who did earn your endorsement the last time he ran. He’s having a lot of trouble with the Tea Party right now. He’s decided to come to your forum, where he was going to skip it. Where do you think he needs to go in order to get Tea Party support? Do you think he’ll get it? DEMINT: Well, the Tea Party’s being thrown around a lot today, but for everyone who calls him a Tea Party — themselves a Tea Party member, there are hundreds of people who have the same concerns about our spending and our debt. We know over 70 percent of Americans want to balance the budget. So it’s not one, small group. What it is, is just thousands of groups around the country who are concerned about the future of our country. I think it’s one of the best things that’s happened to our country and to politics, because there’s a broad cross-section of Americans involved in citizen activism today. And some are called Tea Party; some are not. Some of us are called Democrats, and we’ll be working hard to stop you, Jim. But all the candidates are going to have to appeal to this new grassroots movement. And that’s really what I’m looking for. I’m not trying to anoint any candidate. I’m looking at which one really catches the attention and inspires the average American, who has gotten involved with politics and the political process. So that’s key to me. Any of these candidates are going to have to appeal to those Americans who are unified, particularly around fiscal issues. AMANPOUR: Talking about fiscal issues, President Obama is going to be making a big speech towards a joint session of Congress this week. Do you expect him to make any proposals that will win Republican support? DEMINT: Well, I’m, frankly, very tired of speeches. I don’t want to be disrespectful to the president, but what I want to see is something in writing and that the Congressional Budget Office tells us what it’s going to cost so that we can not only read it ourselves, but the American people can read it. Speeches, we’ve found, are not very similar to the actual legislation. So I’m pretty frustrated with the speech idea. And, frankly, the things that have been leaking out of the White House, none of them are like what I’ve been hearing from businesses all over the country. You know, extending unemployment, cutting payroll taxes, offering tax credits when you hire someone, I haven’t heard one business say things like this. What they want is some certainty. They want the regulators off their back. They want the National Labor Relations Board to stop pushing the union agenda and try to help companies that create jobs. So I don’t think the president is going to come out with things that are really going to create jobs. I’m afraid it’s just pandering to his base. But if he’ll send a written proposal, I’ll give it every chance, in — but I’m not interested in his speech right now. And as the Congressional Budget Office said, we can’t score a speech. We can’t tell him what it’s going to cost or what it’s going to do. AMANPOUR: Senator DeMint, thank you so much for joining us from South Carolina. Must. Hit. Head. On. Wall. Oh Christiane, I had such hopes for you, and I do see the occasional glimmer of what could be. Why would you let a weasel like Jim DeMint string together one lie after another and go unchallenged ? As recently as this week, businesses were saying regulations aren’t the problem with the economy. And Republican extremists are the only people trying to keep the NLRB from doing their job. Not to mention that his only real goal is to keep Obama from being reelected. How about asking him about that ?

Continue reading …
Krugman: ‘If Obama Called for Endorsing Motherhood Republicans in the House Would Oppose It’

If it's Sunday, New York Times columnist Paul Krugman must be ” saying something really stupid or outrageous .” On ABC's “This Week,” the Nobel laureate told host Christiane Amanpour, “If Obama called for endorsing motherhood, the Republicans in the House would oppose it” (video follows with transcript and commentary): PAUL KRUGMAN, NEW YORK TIMES: Obama has an interesting problem, because I think that I, the way I think of it there’s three different things. There's what we should be doing. And what we should be doing is a huge public investment program. No better time to do it. Government can borrow money almost for free. Lots of unemployed workers. Then there’s the question, but it's not going to happen, because the second question is what can actually pass Congress? And the answer is nothing. Nothing. If Obama called for endorsing motherhood, the Republicans in the House would oppose it. Really? As his own newspaper reported August 1, 174 House Republicans voted for an Obama-endorsed agreement to raise the debt ceiling. The previous month, the Times reported 229 House Republicans voted in favor of Cut, Cap and Balance. In April, the Times reported 235 House Republicans voted for Congressman Paul Ryan's (R-Wisc.) budget proposal. Maybe Mr. Krugman ought to read his own paper from time to time for it's continually reporting bills House Republicans voted for. And maybe if the President put something forward that actually made sense, House Republicans would vote for that, too. Better still, maybe he'd even get Democrat support. Or does Mr. Krugman forget that the only budget actually proposed on paper by a Democrat in more than two years – the one Obama offered in February – didn't get one Democrat vote in the Senate? Oh. That's right. That was the House Republicans' fault.

Continue reading …
Japan hit by powerful typhoon

Heavy rains and landslides leave 20 dead and many missing as flooded rivers and collapsed bridges hamper rescue operations At least 20 people have been killed and 50 others missing in Japan after the country’s western coast was hit by typhoon Talas on Sunday. The typhoon has unleashed heavy rains, triggering landslides, and is slowly moving north. The government has ordered evacuation of 460,000 people in western and central Japan. Hundreds of people are still stranded as the rescue efforts are being hampered by flooded rivers and collapsed bridges, local agencies report. The typhoon has caused record amount of rainfall in some areas, making it the worst storm to hit the country since 2004. Talas has damaged Nijojo castle, designated as an important cultural treasure and a popular tourist attraction in the ancient city of Kyoto. Public broadcaster NHK showed a bridge swept away after torrential rain. People holding umbrellas waded through knee-deep water in city streets and residential areas. Many cars were washed away in the floods. Japan’s meteorological agency warned of more heavy rains, strong winds, floods and landslides. It has issued landslide warnings in nearly all of the country’s prefectures. Japan Natural disasters and extreme weather guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Belfast supergrass trial: security forces prepare for violence

Tight security around courts for first such trial since 1985 as UVF members get ready to give evidence against former comrades A ring of steel will be erected around Belfast’s courts district on Tuesday morning as Northern Ireland holds its first terrorist supergrass trial in a generation. Riot police are on standby and separate courts will be opened to keep rival factions apart in preparation for the appearance of two self-confessed members of the Ulster Volunteer Force (UVF), who will give evidence against former loyalist comrades. Fourteen alleged UVF activists face 97 charges ranging from murder to blackmail. The accused belong to the notorious Mount Vernon UVF, a North Belfast terror unit heavily infiltrated by police special branch. The trial will hear accusations that some of those charged with the murder of the rival Ulster Defence Association (UDA) member Tommy English in October 2000 were police agents at the time of the killing. English was murdered at his home in Newtownabbey during a UVF-UDA feud that erupted on Belfast’s Shankill Road two months earlier. The man accused of killing English is Mark Haddock, one of the alleged leaders of the UVF in north Belfast. Haddock was himself targeted by his own terror group after he was unmasked as a special branch informer. Until last week Haddock had been living at a secret address in England under a court order that banned the media from identifying his location. He flew back to Northern Ireland from England on Friday and has since been held in custody. The bulk of the evidence against Haddock has been supplied by David and Robert Stewart, brothers who are serving a prison sentence for aiding and abetting the killers of English. The pair agreed to turn state’s evidence in return for reduced jail sentences. Security sources in Northern Ireland told the Guardian that the police fear the UVF may stage violent protests across Belfast in the hours running up to one of the biggest trials since the controversial supergrass hearings of the 1980s. In June the UVF orchestrated three days of sectarian rioting in east Belfast after mounting an organised attack on the Catholic enclave of Short Strand. Police in Northern Ireland are so concerned about potential trouble that they and the courts service have set up a unique arrangement for relatives of the accused and families of their alleged victims to watch the opening day of the case. Friends, supporters and relations of the alleged UVF gang will be allocated a court a short distance from the main courthouse where the trial will be held. Loyalists have already staged protests against the trial, which they claim is solely based on the evidence of “paid perjurers”, a phrase the UVF used in the 1980s against a number of witnesses in the supergrasses trials that put dozens of loyalists in prison. Banners have been slung across main routes into loyalist districts from a new organisation called Families Against Supergrass Trials. The group has accused police of double standards, claiming investigations are focused on loyalist rather than republican past crimes. At the height of the first supergrass trials between 1982 and 1985, 25 men turned state’s evidence. Loyalist and republican informers put hundreds of suspects behind bars for dozens of murders. In the case of IRA supergrass Christopher Black, 22 of his former comrades were jailed for more than 4,000 years between them. But the system collapsed in 1985 after a judge ruled that another informer’s testimony was “unworthy” and almost all of those who had been held on remand were freed. Northern Ireland UK security and terrorism Police Henry McDonald guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Tony Blair to meet Palestinian and Israeli leaders in peace push

Tony Blair to seek path back to peace talks in effort to avert collision over Palestinian bid to win UN recognition of statehood Tony Blair is expected to meet Palestinian and Israeli leaders this week in an attempt to find a path back to peace negotiations and avert a potential diplomatic collision over a Palestinian bid to win UN recognition of their statehood. The former British prime minister has reportedly been entrusted with the task of finding a formula to restart talks that would be acceptable to the members of the Middle East quartet – the US, the European Union, Russia and the United Nations – as well as to both sides in the conflict. Blair met Binyamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, last week and has further meetings scheduled for this week. The US is accelerating efforts to forestall the Palestinians’ bid to win recognition of their state, according to a report in the New York Times . Barack Obama is anxious to avoid a situation where the US has to veto such an attempt, thus risking the anger of the Arab world. The US has made it clear it will wield its veto if the issue comes to a vote at the security council. Blair is said to be pushing for a consensus around the key issues of borders and acknowledging Israel as a “Jewish state”. However, Israeli officials are unhappy with Obama’s speech in May in which he spoke of a Palestinian state “based on the 1967 lines with mutually agreed land swaps”, saying this should not be the starting point of talks. The Palestinians reject formally acknowledging Israel as a Jewish state as it disregards the 20% of the population that is Palestinian and undermines the “right of return” for Palestinian refugees. Both sides have little confidence in the other’s expressed willingness to return to negotiations. There are also difference of opinion within the quartet that may prove difficult to bridge. Blair has a long track record of negotiating between the Israelis and Palestinians built up over four years as the quartet’s special envoy. According to Daniel Kurtzer, former US ambassador to Israel, the US administration needed a high-profile political figure to push the parties towards negotiations. “There is a bit of outsourcing going on to someone like Tony Blair just to see if he can make something work,” he told Reuters. “If he can, the administration will glom on to it and if he can’t the administration has not soiled its nest.” Israel Palestinian territories Middle East Tony Blair Harriet Sherwood guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Bani Walid: an escalating humanitarian crisis

Muammar Gaddafi’s stronghold said to be a scene of growing desperation with no power or water and food running low Libyan rebels say 25 doctors are seeking entry into one of Muammar Gaddafi’s besieged strongholds in a bid to avert an escalating humanitarian crisis. The town of Bani Walid is said to be a scene of growing desperation with no power or water for a week, food running low and Gaddafi loyalists firing in the streets. Rebels have surrounded the town, one of the last in Libya that remains in the deposed leader’s grip. Despite ongoing clashes they were continuing last ditch efforts to negotiate a peaceful surrender. Rebels claimed their first priority is now bringing emergency relief to the population. At a desert outpost around 60km away, Abusif Ghnyah, a rebel spokesman who comes from Bani Walid, said: “There is no fruit or vegetables and a shortage of water. People are relying on food stored in their house. The city has been without electricity for a week and the houses rely on electricity, even for water. There is nothing at the hospital.” Two of his colleagues had gone to Bani Walid to negotiate passage for 25 doctors, Ghnyah said. “We are not fighters. We want to supply food, medicine and so on. We are preparing for humanitarian intervention. But unless it is 100% safe, we will not go in.” The talks appeared to have broken down because rebels want the doctors and ambulances to go in with an armed convoy. Pro-Gaddafi elements in Bani Walid, 140km southeast of Tripoli, have found this unacceptable. Ghnyah said 120 people gathered in Bani Walid last week and agreed a negotiated surrender, only for the meeting to be disrupted by Gaddafi loyalists shouting dissent. Ghnyah claimed that around 20 loyalist gunmen are causing mayhem in the town, “most likely” on the instructions of Gaddafi himself. “We have heard some of the Gaddafi gangs controlling Bani Walid are making trouble for the people. They are firing into the air and threatening people. They are giving guns to children. They are destroying the city.” On Saturday the rebels claimed that Bani Walid’s radio station was under their control and flags had been raised in defiance. Ghnyah added: “The whole population of Bani Walid is with us but they are frightened for their lives. Their lives are not safe if they say they are with the 17th of February [the date of the uprising]. I heard yesterday the streets are empty of people except these gangs.” Many of the rebel fighters moving up to 10km west of Bani Walid in pickup trucks with mounted artillery guns hail from the town and belong to its dominant tribe, the Warfala. They say they are unwilling to take it by force and risk civilian casualties unless entirely necessary. Various deadlines for surrender have come and gone. Ghnyah added: “We have told them they are our brothers, our elders, and we are not going there for bloodshed. We are patient because we want to save the lives of people. We don’t want to fire one shot, we don’t want to hurt the people.” But asked how just 20 Gaddafi sympathisers could be holding a town of 60,000 people hostage, Ghnyah replied: “That’s a good question.” Rebel officials have given conflicting statements about the situation in Bani Walid and other loyalist areas. Dao Salhin Eljadek, a colonel in the Tripoli Military Council, contradicted earlier reports by suggesting that Gaddafi’s sons, Saif and Saadi, are still in Bani Walid. “Saif is in Bani Walid and has given about 80 FN guns to snipers and mercenaries,” he said. “Saif is causing problems and is causing us to fight each other. The people of Bani Walid should abandon him.” He added: “I know Saadi is in Bani Walid and negotiating a surrender. If they give up, they will be given a fair trial. Everyone who was working with the Gaddafi regime, as soon as surrendering, will be treated humanely and kept safe under our control until going to court.” Asked to estimate the strength of Gaddafi’s forces, Eljadek commented: “Numbers don’t matter. We’ll do our best for the country.” Meanwhile Nato reported bombing an ammunition storage facility near Bani Walid. It also bombed a military barracks, a police camp and several other targets near Gaddafi’s hometown of Sirte on Saturday night, as well as targets near Hun, a possible staging ground in the desert halfway between Sirte and Sabha. National Transitional Council officials announced plans to bring their heavily-armed fighters under control and try to integrate thousands of them into the police force and find jobs for others. Interim interior minister Ahmad Darat said: “We only need the revolutionaries for the first month. We have a plan we will announce today to include 3,000 of the revolutionaries in the interior ministry who will be trained and will work in national security. “The rest of them work in business or are builders etc – they don’t want to be in the police. They will give up their weapons. It’s just a matter of time and organisation.” Libya Muammar Gaddafi Middle East Africa Arab and Middle East unrest David Smith guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

I’m very proud of the 1000 people so far who put themselves on the line to save our world — and ashamed that I’m not there with them. I’m so impressed by their commitment to protecting our environment from this insane climate hazard: More than 200 people were arrested outside the White House Saturday following two weeks of protests directed at President Obama in an effort to persuade him to deny final permitting of a controversial 1,661-mile pipeline that would carry oil from Alberta, Canada, to Port Arthur, Tex. The arrests follow more than 1,000 arrests made since protesters arrived in late August to conduct sit-ins along Pennsylvania Avenue. While a White House decision is not expected until December, the protests centered on an environmental impact statement released Aug. 26 by the US State Department that concluded there will be “no significant impact” on natural resources affected by the pipeline route. If Obama approves the pipeline, it will begin a series of additional permits, approvals and authorizations, with operation set to launch in 2013. T he $7 billion, 36-inch pipeline, called the Keystone XL, is expected to deliver 830,000 barrels, or 34.9 million gallons, per day across Montana, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, and Oklahoma into Texas. TransCanada, a leading North American pipeline operator, started operation of Keystone I, a 36-inch pipeline system, in June 2010, making it possible to deliver Canadian oil to markets across Midwest farmland in several states, from the Dakotas through Illinois. Keystone XL will incorporate a section of that existing pipeline in its delivery through the bottom half of the US. Environmentalists say TransCanada has a failed safety record regarding its pipeline operations. Federal regulators shut down Keystone I following two leaks, on May 7 and May 29. The first released 400 barrels, or 16,800 gallons, of crude oil in Sargent County, North Dakota. The second involved a leak at a pump station in Doniphan County, Kan., which released 10 barrels, or 420 gallons, of crude oil into the environment. The pipeline was restarted days later. In a statement, Russ Girling, TransCanada’s president and chief executive officer said “TransCanada takes all incidents very seriously … none of the incidents involved the pipe in the ground. The integrity of Keystone is sound.” As always when it comes down to environmental roulette, their response is, “Trust us.” Why should we? The stakes are too high.

Continue reading …
9/11 ten years on: America’s tallest building rises from the rubble of Ground Zero

A decade after September 11, a towering monument to US resilience is finally joining the Manhattan skyline When the twin towers collapsed that day, they left behind two giant holes in the world’s most famous skyline, like missing milk teeth in a child’s smile. Once the dust cloud – visible 20 miles away – had settled, all that remained was a cathedral-sized mound of rubble and over 3m cubic metres of air. In the subsequent decade, New Yorkers have instinctively turned to the twin towers to orientate themselves, only to find nothing there. But over the last few months, and with the 10th anniversary of the 21st century’s most notorious event imminent, a new structure has started to stretch upwards, piercing the Manhattan skyline, its roof sprouting cranes like the leaves of a young plant. The building already stands boldly above the others around it and it is only two-thirds complete. With every week that passes, it is claiming its status as the pre-eminent Manhattan landmark. By early next year it will supersede the Empire State Building in height. Even now it draws the eye, particularly at night when its construction lights twinkle like a brooch from Tiffany. This week the tower stands at 80 floors and counting. It is going up at the rate of a floor a week, the product of 24/7 activity by a team of 1,100 workers. By the time it opens, it will be 104 floors; a beacon will take it to the historically resonant height of 1,776ft (541 metres). Up on the 55th floor of the emerging skyscraper – once called Freedom Tower but now known by the more temperate name 1 World Trade Centre – the stunning views are ample evidence of the building’s potential. You can see way across the water, beyond Ellis Island and Lady Liberty to New Jersey, while below us, the memorial gardens are being assembled in honour of those who died. “This is the worst disaster in our country’s history and we’re up 55 storeys and climbing,” says Lee Ielpi, a New York firefighter who knows more about Ground Zero than most. For the past 10 years he has spent most of his waking life here. He arrived at the site soon after the towers fell and for the next nine months he worked 12-hour days atop the rubble searching for bodies. After the site was cleared, he founded a tribute centre that houses a 9/11 exhibition and works with bereaved families. Ielpi’s son Jonathan, also a firefighter, was called out with the Queens-based Squad 288 after the first plane struck and he was in the south tower helping people escape when it came down. His body was discovered three months to the day after the disaster; Ielpi carried his son out with his own hands. Ielpi rattles off the key statistics, by now as familiar to him as his son’s name. “On this site 2,749 people were murdered in a matter of 102 minutes. There are still 1,125 people missing, 10 years later. Only 174 whole bodies were found. One of them was Jonathan.” Later, he says: “People ask me, ‘It’s been 10 years, what’s it like?’ Well, it’s like I haven’t seen my son for 10 years. Nothing more than that.” Ielpi takes us on a tour of the 16-acre site, which, on 12 September will be opened to the public for the first time. We walk around the footprint of the south tower and come to a stop in front of an oak tree, one of 415 planted at Ground Zero. “This is the first time I’ve seen that guy blooming,” Ielpi says. “I see it and I think of my son. Twenty nine. Married with two little boys. Loved helping people. Knew where he was going on the 11th, knew what he had to do. So yeah, I look at this tree, and this is nice.” Jonathan’s name is etched in a bronze panel that runs around the four sides of the footprint of the south tower. Also named here are the other victims – those on the aircraft, the emergency workers, and the victims of the Pentagon and Pennsylvania crashes. A second tribute at the north tower bears the names of those who died there as well as those killed in the first terror attack on the World Trade Centre, on 26 February 1993. From Sunday both footprints will be transformed into massive reflective pools with water falling 30 feet from their edges. “I can’t tell you how powerful it is,” Ielpi says. “I’ve stood by that edge and listened as the water cascades down. If you want to hear somebody, there’s a good likelihood you’re going to hear somebody.” Standing in the middle of Ground Zero, you can now start to appreciate the fusion of commemoration and rebirth that is gathering pace. Next year the 9/11 Memorial Museum will open, running underneath the plaza and housing many artefacts from the twin towers, including two enormous tridents from the north tower that are already in place. In 2013 the fourth tower on the site, a 60-floor skyscraper designed by Fumihiko Maki that is now going up, is scheduled to open, followed in January 2014 by 1 World Trade Centre. Towers two and three, by the British architects Lord (Norman) Foster and Lord (Richard) Rogers respectively, have yet to have firm completion dates. The relief that there is something finally happening at the site is palpable. To have had nothing to show a decade after the attacks would have been an enormous embarrassment for New York and for America. Part of the reason for the painfully slow progress has been physical – the World Trade Centre was built on more than 20 metres of landfill on the Hudson river which, added to the maze of commuter and subway lines that runs beneath it, makes for a fiendishly complicated infrastructure. But a less acceptable cause of delay has been the messy and at times ugly interaction between the countless entities that have vied to control aspects of the project, from the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey that owns the site, to the private developer Larry Silverstein who leases much of it, through New York city, the railway and subway authorities, insurance companies, local businesses and residents of Lower Manhattan and, of course, the relatives of those who died. Paul Goldberger, the New Yorker’s architecture critic, who has tracked the project over the last decade, says the rebuilding has been beset by “enormous battles between all the participants who could not agree on what to do, how to do it and who should pay for it”. At its lowest point, the paralysis that took hold after 9/11 made a mockery of New York’s reputation as the can-do city where anything is possible. “That’s a myth left over from another age. As New York has become older and more mature, it has lost the we’ll-do-it-no-matter-what attitude that it pioneered but that now exists in places like Dubai or Singapore.” Goldberger has mixed feelings about the redevelopment as it takes shape. He praises the memorial features of the project, with the footprints of the twin towers as their centrepiece, which he thinks will honour the victims in a moving and important way. But he harbours doubts about the buildings that will surround the memorial, particularly 1 World Trade Centre. Designed by the American architect David Childs, it has gone through several incarnations, each one more conventional than the last. “It’s going to be a good building, but no more than that,” Goldberger says. “We lost the opportunity to build a great building by being overly conservative in the design, overly concerned with security. It saddens me that we didn’t take this opportunity to reassert American leadership. America is where the skyscraper began. We could have taken this piece of land, in the city of skyscrapers, and built the greenest, most exciting and innovative skyscraper that will show a whole new direction. We didn’t do that.” Despite the reservations of the city’s pre-eminent architecture critic, commercially 1 World Trade Centre looks set on a path towards success. Tara Stacom, vice chairman of Cushman & Wakefield, the property firm handling the leasing of the office space, predicts it will be the “most important building in the western hemisphere – it’s going to be the coolest, hippest place to work and live.” She says a range of media and law firms, entertainment companies and financial businesses have expressed interest in taking up space, including some from Europe and the UK. In the biggest deal to date, the magazine publisher Conde Nast has signed up for one million square feet – more than a third of the building. When the idea of another vast tower, which on completion will be the tallest in the Americas, was first suggested, sceptics argued that it would never be built because nobody would ever want to sit in an office high in the New York sky for fear of a repeat attack. But Stacom insists that has not been a worry for prospective clients. “When we tour the site it’s all about what an incredible place this is going to be.” Back at Ground Zero, overlooking the pool at the south tower where his son died, Lee Ielpi says it’s time to move on. “There are some family members – and you can understand it – who can’t get beyond 9/11. Their loved ones were taken away in a horrible way. But you have to get on. You never forget, but if you don’t get on you’re going to be trapped.” Ielpi believes that when the rebuilding is finally finished, it will radiate its message far beyond the limits of Manhattan, of New York or even of the US. “We’re putting a memorial here, a museum here, we are going to remember our loved ones, and then we are going to surround it with beautiful buildings to replace those that were destroyed through hatred. We’re going to show the terrorists that through our resilience – ours, as a world’s – we can do it. We will overcome the obstructions that come along.” September 11 2001 United States Global terrorism Ed Pilkington guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Siemens on track to take Crossrail contract to Germany

German group that took contract to build Thameslink trains is on Crossrail shortlist despite preference for UK bid German group Siemens will build the Crossrail train fleet in its Düsseldorf factory if it wins the £1bn contract, despite the government’s stated preference for a UK-based bidder. Siemens is one of the frontrunners for the UK’s next major train manufacturing contract due to its financial heft and its selection as preferred bidder for the £1.4bn Thameslink contract. However, the furore over the Thameslink decision , which has threatened the future of Britain’s last remaining train factory at Bombardier’s Derby facility, has forced ministers to pledge that the next train supply contest will put British contenders on an “equal footing” with their European counterparts. Speaking ahead of a House of Commons hearing on Thameslink on 7 September, Steve Scrimshaw, head of Siemens’ UK rolling stock division, said the main production base for the 60 Crossrail trains will be at the group’s Krefeld plant near Düsseldorf, with some components made in the UK. “We have no plans, as we currently stand, to establish a production facility in the UK for making trains for Crossrail,” he said. Siemens believes it has enough capacity in the Krefeld factory where the Thameslink carriages – to build the 60 Crossrail trains as well will be made. Scrimshaw added that Siemens, one of four bidders for the Crossrail contract, was not concerned that the government’s pledge will increase the chances of a UK-based company winning the deal. “It is not anything that we are frightened about. Ultimately it has to be in line with European Union law and I am sure the government will not break European law,” he said. EU rules bar states from showing explicit domestic bias in procurement decisions. France’s Alstom pulled out of the Crossrail process last week, citing the incompatibility of its range of products, but Siemens remains a frontrunner because the Thameslink fleet is expected to be very similar to the Crossrail rolling stock. “We are going to stay in the Crossrail process,” said Scrimshaw. The other bidders on the Crossrail shortlist are Canadian group Bombardier, Spain’s CAF and Hitachi of Japan. Last week Crossrail, which is building a new rail route linking Heathrow to Canary Wharf, said it would delay awarding the contract until 2014, allowing the government to factor in the conclusions of its procurement review. The decision to select Siemens as preferred bidder for Thameslink has enraged local politicians and trade unions, after Bombardier announced it would cut more than 1,400 jobs. The Unite union said it fears the Derby plant, which employs 3,000 people, will close once construction on a London Underground train contract has finished in 2014. The Thameslink decision triggered a political row over the government’s ability to defend British manufacturing when it has described the sector as crucial to the economic recovery. However, Scrimshaw said: “We won the bid fairly and squarely in accordance with the evaluation criteria. We have offered UK employment to up to 2,000 people, to add to the 16,000 Siemens already employs in the UK.” Siemens has a long-established presence in the UK, which dates back to 1843 when William Siemens, then a 19-year-old engineer, arrived in Britain from Hamburg. However, critics of the Thameslink deal argue that the jobs created by Siemens will not contribute to a permanent train manufacturing base that could ultimately replace Derby. Nearly three-quarters of the jobs linked to the Thameslink deal will be in construction of the train depots, train maintenance and in the local supply chain. A further 300 will be based at the Siemens electrical components facility in Hebden Bridge, Yorkshire. Siemens Germany Manufacturing sector Bombardier Crossrail Rail transport Transport Transport policy Dan Milmo guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Red Cross chief visits Syria as killings continue

Jakob Kellenberger to meet Bashar al-Assad after activist network reports 14 more deaths and gang attacks military bus The deaths of several protesters and security personnel were reported in Syria on Sunday as the head of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) visited Damascus to seek access to activists arrested during the five-and-a-half-month uprising. At least 14 people were shot dead across Syria, including in suburbs of the capital and the western cities of Homs and Hama, according to the Local Co-ordination Committees, an activist network. A journalist, Amer Mattar, was among a wave of reported arrests that spread from the capital to the northern port city of Latakia and to Deir Ezzor, near the Iraqi border. The government said nine people were killed when an “armed gang” opened fire with machine guns at a military bus in central Syria. The state news agency Sana said six soldiers and three civilians had died. The report could not be confirmed, but activists say there have been limited cases of retaliatory killings in areas subjected to the most brutal crackdowns. One Homs resident said: “Some people are arming and we have killed security forces and shabiha [pro-regime thugs assisting in the crackdown], but only in retaliation.” The ICRC chief, Jakob Kellenberger, met the foreign minister, Walid al-Muallem, and was scheduled to meet the president, Bashar al-Assad, on Monday, Sana said. The visit came as Nabil al-Araby, the head of the Arab League, said he had been given permission to visit Damascus. Last week the 22-country body called on the Syrian regime to stop the bloodshed. Despite rejecting foreign interference, Syria appears to be granting greater access to foreign delegations amid growing international pressure. Last week a UN humanitarian delegation visited cities including Latakia and Homs, where government forces reportedly opened fire at protesters as the delegation was leaving the city. “The Syrian government told me that it welcomes the visit of the secretary general at any time and it will probably be this week,” Araby told a press conference in Cairo. On Saturday four of Syria’s leading businessmen were put under EU sanctions for alleged financial support of the regime, as a European oil embargo was passed. The European energy sanctions will have more effect than the US embargo because the majority of Syrian oil – which accounts for more than a quarter of government revenue – is sold to France, Germany, Italy and the Netherlands. France’s foreign minister, Alain Juppe, on Saturday called for further international pressure against the regime in Damascus. But Russia and China have blocked attempts to get the UN security council to adopt a resolution against Syria. Syria blames foreign-backed armed groups for the ongoing violence in which at least 2,200 people have died, according to the UN. Thousands more have been detained. Nour Ali is the pseudonym of a journalist based in Damascus Syria Bashar Al-Assad Middle East Nour Ali guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …