Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 326)

Title: Song To Woody Artist: Bob Dylan Here’s to Workers!

Continue reading …

It’s fun to laugh at Michele Bachmann. Just as it was fun to laugh at Sarah Palin’s idiocy in the 2008 election. During the past election many political pundits knew a McCain Presidency would never come to be and many institutional Republicans blame Palin for the loss. Several weeks ago I had a conversation with a Republican campaign consultant who smirked at the possibility of Bachmann as the GOP nominee. “She won’t be the one,” the consultant said. Yet, August’s Gallup poll showed her among the top three candidates. The top three usually are the ones pundits and reporters believe are the only viable candidates in the race. That’s why the things she has said are fair game. Many people, particularly in Iowa, consider Bachmann to be the brilliant leader GOP voters have been looking for, and there’s a third chance, if you take the Gallup poll seriously, that Bachmann will be the nominee. Here are the top five things Bachmann has said and why they should be concerning for our country. 1. ” Not all cultures are equal . . .” When she was first running for office in 2005, Bachmann said this line during a candidate debate in efforts to convey she believed Muslims had an inferior culture to the western world. We live in an increasingly globalized world. Thomas Friedman called it a flat world because we’re so interconnected. Insensitivity might be a fun talking point for Fox News to poke at, but the reality is that an isolated nation is an endangered nation. We have more at stake than hand shakes and photo-ops. Trade, security, not to mention arms dealing are all things that our country should have a secure handle on at all times. If we have a leader that doesn’t care about the cultures of other nations we run the risk of alienating those nations and isolating the U.S. at our own peril. 2. “If we took away the minimum wage – if conceivably it was gone – we could potentially virtually wipe out unemployment completely because we would be able to offer jobs at whatever level.” Bachmann 2005 . Let’s go beyond the fact that this is a classist statement that throws the poor under the bus. Instead, I would like to look at the lack of understanding today’s tea party Republicans seem to have about basic economics. Corporations are not your best friend who believes that you and your family should be taken care of. Instead the minimum wage is so-called because it is the basic minimum that an employer is allowed to pay his employee. If they could get away with paying you a quarter, they would because it means larger profits for them. In these tough economic markets there would probably be a worker willing to work for 25 cents an hour. If the competition of the corporation are getting away with paying people only 20 cents the pay could drop lower to allow for even greater profits. This results in a race to the bottom. While many believe the minimum wage was created just to help eradicate poverty (which it does help with), the reality is it’s about fairness and how we value work in a modern society. If we decide as a country that we don’t value work above a quarter then suddenly people can make more money scavenging through a stadium after a game than they would serving you food at Denny’s. In the massive economic recession we’re experiencing it’s not only important, it’s critical to have a President who understands the fundamentals of pocketbook issues. Families are hurting and unemployment is high; now more than ever we need a President who will put people first over the needs of corporations. 3. “Carbon dioxide is portrayed as harmful but there isn’t even one study that can be produced that shows that carbon dioxide is a harmful gas.” Bachmann said on the floor of Congress in 2009 . After the President selling us out on pollution caps I think we can all agree we’re screwed on reducing CO2. Municipalities and insurance companies are already preparing for what they believe will be the impacts of global climate change. But, let’s forget that this is a critical issue for a minute and focus on the fact that Bachmann doesn’t know what CO2 is. Not even that she doesn’t know, but that a professional Congressional staff allowed their member to go onto the floor of the House of Congress and say this. It’s more concerning that someone who is believed to be qualified to serve as a President of the United States and doesn’t know that you don’t sit in a garage with the engine running. 4. “Gay marriage is probably the biggest issue that will impact our state and our nation in the last, at least, thirty years. I’m not understating that.” See the video above. We all know that Bachmann has a difficult time with the LGBT community. In efforts not to understate it, let’s just say Bachmann doesn’t like the gays. But it’s more concerning that she thinks this is the issue that will impact us over the course of 30 years. This is on the Sally Kern level of belief that the LGBT community is more dangerous than terrorism. We have serious problems when it comes to protecting our nation and stabilizing our economy. People who believe that social issues are more important are terrifying not just to American voters but also to people trying to do business in our country or with our country. Similarly, there’s a problem with a potential President who believes that Gay Rights are more historic than 9/11. I don’t mean to belittle our equality movement, but we’re talking about a defining moment in our country that is belittled by people like Bachmann and Kern. As Wanda Sykes suggested about Sally Kern’s comments about gays being more dangerous than terrorists, perhaps someone like Bachamann will pull our troops from the bases across the world and parachute them into West Hollywood. This might not be the best strategic operation for strengthening a nation’s security. 5. “I don’t know how much God has to do to get the attention of the politicians. We’ve had an earthquake; we’ve had a hurricane. He said, ‘Are you going to start listening to me here?’ Listen to the American people because the American people are roaring right now. They know government is on a morbid obesity diet and we’ve got to rein in the spending.” –Rep. Michele Bachmann, suggesting at a presidential campaign event in Florida that the 2011 East Coast earthquake and hurricane was a message from God (Aug. 2011) Bachmann later said about this quote that she was joking then tried to say that it was a metaphor . If it was a joke or a metaphor it’s in bad taste to be so insensitive to so many people who lost lives and property in a natural disaster. That’s not acceptable from a President. Beyond that, someone who thinks that God is enacting retribution on Congress when they’re not even in session is to careless even for a joke. Finally, if a deity of any kind were trying to send a message to put America on a spending diet why would that deity send a costly natural disaster? Wouldn’t “God” send a stabilization of the economy in efforts to encourage us to cut spending? With so much insensitivity and disconnection toward American families it’s hard to imagine Bachmann being a viable anything.

Continue reading …
CNBC’s Caruso-Cabrera Blames Govt Spending for Europe’s Economic Problems

CNBC's Caruso-Cabrera Blames Govt Spending for Europe's Economic Problems Appearing on Monday's NBC Nightly News, CNBC's Michelle Caruso-Cabrera blamed decades of overspending by European governments and borrowing to help provide promised benefits for the continent's current economic problems. Caruso-Cabrera: MICHELLE CARUSO-CARBRERA: Well, the general concern, Kate, is that a lot of governments in Europe for many decades now have borrowed a lot of money in order to give very generous benefits to their workers and their retirees. They thought that they would grow enough to generate enough revenue to pay back those debts. That hasn't happened. The CNBC correspondent – known for her libertarian economic views – went on blame the day's stock market drop in Europe on Italy's refusal to cut its own government spending in spite of promising to do so in exchange for receiving outside assistance in dealing with its national debt: Europe's central banks stepped in and said we will help you, Italy, we will help you keep your interest rates low, but you've got to promise to make changes like balancing your budget, reducing the size of your government, which is very bloated, passing a balanced budget amendment. So far Italy has failed to do all those things despite getting the help, and over the weekend leaders of the European central bank made very clear they're unhappy with Italy. Below is a complete transcript of the segment from the Monday, September 5, NBC Nightly News : KATE SNOW: Wall Street was closed on this Labor Day holiday, but other financial markets around the world took a beating today. Worries about the economy here at home with that job number on Friday saying job growth flat-lined and fresh anxiety about a possible debt disaster in Europe smashed stocks there. Germany's main stock index fell 5.3 percent,

Continue reading …
Hurricane Irene relief fund estimated at $1.5bn

White House says cost to taxpayer comes on top of $5.2bn needed to deal with other recent disasters The damage caused by Hurricane Irene will cost $1.5bn in disaster relief, the White House has estimated. White House budget director Jacob Lew said the cost to taxpayers came on top of $5.2bn needed to deal with other recent disasters, including tornadoes that leveled much of Joplin, Missouri. Announcing the initial estimate, Lew said the $1.5bn relief fund should last through next year. More than 40 people were killed when Irene lashed the eastern easboard from the Carolinas to Maine. Despite being downgraded to a tropical storm as it hit land, Irene destroyed many homes and caused serious flooding in Vermont and upstate New York. The damage is expected to total billions of dollars but federal government aid does not include costs covered by private insurance. The costing came as the remenants of Tropical Storm Lee killed a man in Mississippi when he was swept away by floodwaters. John Howard Anderson Jr, 57, had been in a car with two other people trying to cross a rain-swollen creek. Tishomingo County coroner Mack Wilemon said he was told Anderson was outside the car and had been thrown a rope to be rescued, but he could not hold on. The storm was last night sweeping across Alabama and pushing into Georgia, where strong winds, possibly of tornado strength, sent trees crashing into homes and injured at least one person. Lieutenant Jay Baker of the Cherokee county sheriff’s office, northwest of Atlanta, said one person was taken to a hospital with injuries that were not life-threatening. By Monday afternoon at least 16,000 people were without power in Louisiana and Mississippi, which bore the brunt of the storm over the weekend. Hurricane Irene Natural disasters and extreme weather United States David Batty guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Canceled Mail: Could the U.S. Postal Service Really Close?

Cash. Some have it; some don’t. The United States Postal Service sits squarely in the Have Nots group, unable to make a $5.5 billion payment due this month and on the verge of shutting down entirely without Congress taking emergency action, according to a New York Times report. Already, the threats from the USPS have

Continue reading …

Bad, bad news for the farmers — and probably bad news for smokers, too: Reporting from Craven County, N.C.— Before Hurricane Irene smacked his tender tobacco plants sideways, David Parker was headed for a terrific crop, maybe his best in 32 years of farming. Now, as Parker rushes to save a few acres of shredded leaves before they rot on the dying stalks, the math looks different. “I’ve never had a year I didn’t make money farming, but I think this will be the one that gets us there,” he said last week, driving up a dirt road between a beaten-down cotton field and a 17-acre patch of dejected-looking tobacco. The green-gold tobacco leaves — which normally this time of year would be spread wide, waiting to be plucked, dried at a careful pace and taken to market — were hanging straight down, shriveled, with the stalks leaning the way that the wind had pushed them. That’s what this agricultural disaster looks like: wilted leaves, angled stalks, a tangle of cotton plants with fat bolls that had looked unusually promising but now might not open. Subtle stuff to everyone but the hundreds of farmers who, like Brown, now face what may be their worst losses ever. “That’s not vacation cottages. It’s these people’s whole way of making a living, and the impact will spread throughout all the people and businesses that rely on farmers,” said Graham Boyd, executive vice president of the Tobacco Growers Assn. of North Carolina. “It’s a tragedy, just terrible, terrible stuff.” State and federal officials say it will be weeks before the full extent of the farm losses are known, but the effect on tobacco, which is grown in much of the area where the storm punched hardest, is extensive.

Continue reading …
Meet the Godfather: Wendi Deng Reveals Just How Close Tony Blair Is to the Murdochs

From a tiger-wife stint to a TMI interview, Wendi Deng has certainly been making headlines recently. Rupert Murdoch’s wife — who famously leaped to her husband’s defense when a prankster tried to shove a shaving-cream pie in the tycoon’s face at a parliament hearing — dropped a potentially damning bombshell in an upcoming interview with

Continue reading …
Forget ‘The Undefeated:’ Here’s the Original Sarah Palin Fantasy Film

enlarge Credit: wikipedia It’s been a solid three years since Sarah Palin was unleashed upon the Lower 48 as Senator John McCain’s running mate. It had a big impact on the 2008 race. For example: The following day she raised $10 million for the Obama/Biden ticket. She’s really been a gift. I often think about the moment McCain realized Sarah Palin isn’t too bright. I imagine a staffer sitting him down and trying to explain why she couldn’t do any ( more ) interviews or stump by herself. That she was going to appear more like his wife than his veep candidate on the campaign trail. And that his “hail Mary pass” just fumbled. In my mind it’s similar to the moment where Palin invited a crowd to play what she called “Stump the Candidate,” where McCain panicked, grabbed her mike and changed the subject. The moment, in my mind, is like that, only longer and with more forehead slapping. But before the Katie Couric interviews – before the world came to the conclusion she was not prepared to be the leader of the free world. Before Putin was going to rear his head, before she admitted to reading all newspapers and magazines with a great appreciation, before going rogue – there was the Sarah Palin mythology film Protocol . No, as far as fantasy films about the former governor of Alaska – it’s not Larry Flynt’s Nailin’ Palin . It’s an obscure Goldie Hawn film released in 1984. Hawn plays Sunny Davis, a ditzy yet adorable down-on-her-luck cocktail waitress in Washington DC. One fateful night she takes a bullet for a visiting luminary (an Emir). She quickly becomes a national sensation. She’s folksy, hailing from rural Oregon. Like real people. And she has a rabid adoring following. So of course she’s given a top job at the State Department working in the Office of Protocol. Sunny is comically unsophisticated. She doesn’t have the right clothes or know how to act all the time. She’s a Washington outsider. The big government meanies, wanting to make good with the Emir in a plot to build a military base in the Middle East send an unaware Sunny to be his wife. After a coup, Sunny discovers the deceit. The ensuing scandal when she returns home is called “Sunnygate.” Towards the end of the film, in a Congressional hearing, Sunny is asked to name names. Who did this to her? Who’s responsible? Instead gives a rousing speech : “You want to know something? Before I worked for the government, I’d never read the Constitution. I didn’t even begin to know how things worked. I didn’t read the newspaper, except to look up my horoscope. And I never read the Declaration of Independence. But I knew they had, the ones were talking about, the experts, they read it. They just forgot what it was about. That its about We, the People. And that’s ME. I’m We, the People. And you’re We, the People. And we’re all We, the People, all of us. “So when they sell me that ten cent diamond ring or down the river or to some guy who wears a lot of medals, then that means they’re selling ALL of us, all of we the people. And when YOU guys spend another pile of money and when you give away or sell all those guns and tanks, and every time you invite another foreign big shot to the White House and hug and kiss him and give him presents, it has a direct effect on We the People’s lives. “So if we don’t, I mean if I don’t know what you’re up to, and if I don’t holler and scream when I think you’re doing it wrong, and if I just mind my own business and don’t vote or care, then I just get what I deserve. So now that I’m a private citizen again, you’re going to have to watch out for me. ‘Cause I’m going to be watching all of you. Like a hawk.” The final scene is Sunny at her campaign headquarters getting a phone call informing her she’s won a seat in Congress. So an obscure – outside the beltway – rural – unrefined attractive woman ends up “shaking things up in Washington” being more ethical and honest and smarter than The Establishment? In the 1990’s women were denounced for having what was called “ a Cinderella complex .” The GOP ticket last year had a Protocol Plot on the brain. Sarah Palin’s narrative on paper was brilliant: Hunter, pro-choice, mother of many, popular governor – good looking. But then the curtain was lifted to reveal an ethically challenged, willfully ignorant, diva with no follow through. But strangely enough, to her apologists, to her fanatical base Sarah Palin will always be Sunny Davis to them. Sometimes I wonder if they actually watched her resignation speech or just a re-run of Private Benjamin with the sound off. I think I know the answer to that. Cross posted at tinadupuy.com

Continue reading …

In the New York Times magazine this last Sunday with the unintentionally hilarious headline “What the Left Doesn’t Understand About Obama,” editor of The New Republic , Jonathan Chait has a whopper in the very first paragraph (emphasis is mine): This has been the summer that liberal discontent with Obama has finally crystallized. The frustration has been simmering for a while — through centrist appointments, bank bailouts and the defeat of the public option, to name a few examples. But it has taken the debt-ceiling standoff and the threat of a double-dip recession to create a leftist critique of the president that stuck. Obama passed the stimulus . The stimulus that worked . Bush bailed out the banks and the auto industry. Now the American auto industry is slightly booming at the moment. Hiring and everything. And the banksters are rich and under-taxed. As much as I hate to admit it – something horrible Bush did actually worked. Get that? Bush bailed out the banks and the auto industry in ’08. Guess who wasn’t President until January ’09? Someone who couldn’t have bailed out anything yet. Obama got stuck with its implementation but he didn’t start it. Bush is the Bailout President. Remember: “I’ve abandoned free-market principles to save the free-market system .” This is revisionist at best. Otherwise false. This deserves a correction. That’s what we do in journalism – whether is at a blog or at the Grey Lady. The New York Times needs to correct this error.

Continue reading …
Edinburgh University to charge £36,000 a degree

New £9,000 annual fee for all courses, with four-year degrees as standard, makes Edinburgh Britain’s most expensive university Edinburgh University has announced that it will charge non-Scottish UK students £36,000 for a degree. The National Union of Students Scotland said the new £9,000 annual fee for all courses, with four-year degrees as standard, makes Edinburgh the most expensive university in Britain. Heriot Watt and Aberdeen universities have also announced £9,000-a-year fees for non-Scots, but unlike Edinburgh they are capping fees at £27,000. Edinburgh defended its decision by saying it would offset its fees with generous £6.7m-a-year bursaries for its non-Scottish undergraduates. It will be heavily funded by the higher fees, and be worth up to £7,000 a year per student. Professor Mary Bownes, the university’s vice chancellor for external engagement, said: “The increase in the fee is necessary as we will no longer receive government funding for the rest of the UK domiciled students. These students will be studying at one of the world’s top teaching and research institutions, regularly ranked amongst the leading universities in the world.” About 22,500 “rest of the UK” students go to Scottish universities each a year, currently paying £1,820 a year in fees, but the new fees were authorised by the Scottish government earlier this year. Scottish university principals and Scottish ministers feared that there would be a surge in “fee refugees” heading north to avoid the £9,000 a year fees for English colleges authorised by the UK government. Heriot Watt and Aberdeen have also announced new and enhanced bursaries for poorer students from outside Scotland to offset the new charges but the top-rate fees were denounced by the National Union of Students Scotland as “terrible news”. Referring to Edinburgh’s decision, Graeme Kirkpatrick, the union’s depute president, said: “A £36,000 degree is both staggering and ridiculous. The average cost to study at Oxford and Cambridge is around £25,000 in fees, which while still eye-wateringly large, pales in comparison with this. And that’s before you add additional debt for the extra year of living costs for the four-year degree in Scotland. “This is nothing less than cashing in on students from the rest of the UK, and giving the signal that Edinburgh University is more interested in the money you can bring, as opposed to your academic ability. The reputational damage this could do, not only to Edinburgh but to the whole of Scottish higher education, should not be underestimated. “There’s clearly a race to the top happening here in terms of setting fees. It’s a depressing day when a university feels it’s more likely to be judged on the price tag it chooses rather than the quality of the education it provides. Tuition fees put off the poorest students and make university more about your bank balance than your ability.” Most university courses in Scotland last four years, against three elsewhere in the UK, because many courses start with a general “foundation” year before students begin specialising fully. That would have allowed Scottish colleges to set fees as high as £36,000 for a full four-year degree, much higher than their English counterparts, but Scottish universities believe most English students with strong A-level grades will be able to bypass the foundation year and begin their courses in second year. Some students will face higher fees. Students doing medicine at Aberdeen and Edinburgh will still be charged £9,000 a year for the full five year course, as in England. Heriot Watt said students on “enhanced”, five year courses in engineering, physics, chemistry and maths would be charged £9,000 for four years. The Scottish universities argue the decision to cap fees for mainstream subjects at £27,000 will allow them to compete directly with English colleges. Professor Steve Chapman, the principle at Heriot Watt, defended the new fees, which will affect about 225 non-Scottish students there each year. He said his university’s degrees were “a positive investment in future employment. Over 92% of our graduates are in work or further study within six months of graduation, with approximately three quarters of those going straight into graduate level jobs.” Heriot Watt also expects that a third of its student from the rest of the UK will be able to get bursaries to help the new fees. Scottish students will not be charged the new £9,000 a year fees because of an anomaly in European Union laws, which is expected to be challenged in court by several English students and the Birmingham-based law firm Public Interest Law. Since the Scottish government does not charge its residents university fees, all other non-UK students are also entitled to free tuition under EU laws. However, as Scotland is a subsidiary part of the UK and is not a member state in its own right, it is able to treat other UK citizens differently. Tuition fees Higher education Edinburgh Students Scotland Severin Carrell guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …