Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 302)
Mississippi to vote on reversing abortion rights by redefining ‘person’

Campaigners criticise state’s supreme court for refusing to block amendment that will appear on 8 November ballot Mississippi voters will be allowed to vote on an initiative that seeks to reverse abortion rights by redefining the term “person” to apply at the moment of conception. The state’s supreme court refused to block the amendment, which will now appear on the general election ballot on 8 November. A majority of the justices said they could not rule on whether measures were constitutional until voters of the legislature had had a chance to pass them. Civil rights campaigners criticised the court ruling and described the measure as “harmful to women”. Nsombi Lambright, executive director of the ACLU of Mississippi said: “We’re disappointed with the ruling. A measure will be on the ballot that will allow the government to dictate what is a private matter that’s best decided by a woman and her family, within the context of her faith. Mississippi voters should reject this intrusive and dangerous measure.” Bear Atwood, legal director of the ACLU of Mississippi, said: “This initiative is extreme and could severely undermine women’s access to birth control, in vitro fertilization and life-saving medical procedures.” Measure 26 seeks to alter the term person or persons to include “every human being from the moment of fertilisation, cloning or functional equivalent thereof”. It is part of a swing across conservative states, particularly in the south, towards legislating for life to begin at conception, thus undermining piecemeal Roe V Wade, the landmark US supreme court ruling that set out the right to abortion. The initiative was challenged by a Mississippi citizen because it failed to comply with the state’s official ballot initiative process which forbids making modifications to the Bill of Rights. Cristen Hemmins, the plaintiff, said: “As a lifelong Mississippian, I am disappointed that this broad and intrusive measure has been allowed on the ballot. I call on all voters to vote ‘no’ on #26. The government should not be interfering with the personal and private health care decisions of Mississippi families.” But anti-abortion groups such as the American Family Association and Pro-Life Mississippi welcomed the judge’s decision. “Today we rejoice and celebrate this hard-won victory, but tomorrow we roll up our sleeves and return to work,” Stephen Crampton, the attorney for the proponents told the Associated Press. “Our opponents are discouraged, but not yet ultimately defeated. They will be back, spreading fear, confusion, and dire ‘sky-is-falling’ warnings about this simple Amendment, and we must be ready to rebut their baseless charges and set the record straight.” The ruling follows that three months ago, when Rennie Gibbs, of Mississippi, because the first woman to be charged with murder following the stillbirth of her baby. Across the US, more and more prosecutions are being brought that seek to turn pregnant women into criminals. Mississippi Abortion United States Health Women Karen McVeigh guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

The Daily Show with Jon Stewart Get More: Daily Show Full Episodes , Political Humor & Satire Blog , The Daily Show on Facebook Jon Stewart on Texas Governor Rick Perry’s sitting style: “Try not to move around in your chair like you need your anal glands squeezed.” Former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney’s economic plan was released Tuesday. “You can go on Amazon Kindle – and – I don’t know if its free or not – but I hope so and its in color,” said the candidate. Stewart: “First off – you don’t know how much your economic plan costs people to get. And secondly: Oh good it’s in color – because otherwise your 150-page economic plan might be boring.”

Continue reading …
President Obama’s jobs speech to Congress – live

President Obama delivers a speech on jobs and the US economy to Congress – follow the action and reaction here live 7.35pm: Now here’s the politics: Obama goes on a riff “I reject the idea” that Americans are forced to choose between jobs and regulations. And he doesn’t want America to be in a race for the bottom, he wants it to be in a race for the top, unsurprisingly. 7.32pm: RedState’s Erick Erickson isn’t happy, via Twitter : “Instead of yelling ‘you lie’ at him, I wish they’d loudly laugh at this farce. This speech is a rehashed joke.” 7.29pm: By Obama’s standards, this is a very direct, straight-forward speech by Obama. No fancy turns of phrase so far. For example: This isn’t political grandstanding. This isn’t class warfare. This is simple math. These are real choices that we have to make. 7.26pm: I think there’s a subtle message in this speech, and that is that passing this jobs bill is a high priority for the White House. 7.24pm: Since then we’ve had several more “pass this jobs bills”. Yep, Chuck’s right. If you had “pass this jobs bill” in the Presidential Speech drinking game, you’re already passed out by now. 7.22pm: MSNBC’s Chuck Todd tweets : “I’ve already lost count of the number of times POTUS has said “pass this jobs bill.” 7.17pm: “Fifty House Republicans” have proposed similar payroll tax cuts, says Obama. “You should pass this bill now,” he repeats, and then gets tougher: Building a world class transportation system was part of what made us a economic superpower. And now you’re going to sit back and watch China build newer airports and faster railroads, at a time when millions of unemployed construction workers could build them right here in America? 7.15pm: Now Obama is explaining his American Jobs Act, stressing that every proposal in it has been supported by politicians on both sides: It will provide a jolt to the American economy … you should pass this jobs plan right away. At that moment a huge crash of thunder and lightning is heard over NW Washington. Maybe a good sign? 7.10pm: Here’s Obama, saying that Americans “know that Washington has not always put their interests first”: The people of this country work hard to meet their responsibilities. The question tonight is, whether we will meet ours. The question is whether in the face of an on-going national crisis, we can stop the circus and actually do something to save the economy. 7.09pm: Strangely, the mood actually seems more pleasant in atmosphere than in the last State of the Union, back in January. It’s going to be 43 minutes long, according to Shep. 7.05pm: Here we go: “Mr Speaker, the President of the United States,” is the call by Sergeant-at-Arms Bill Livingood, and here Obama is, shaking hands and looking jolly. “This looks exactly like a State of the Union address,” sniffs Shepherd Smith, the only Fox News presenter worth a pitcher of spit. Or just a pitcher. 7.02pm: We’ve just added a live video of this event to this blog, so refresh the page and you’ll see it. 6.58pm: Not long to go. There’s Michelle Obama being applauded. She’s in magenta. Or possible fuschia. The dress I mean. 6.50pm: There’s some pro forma stuff that has to be got through, and that’s being done right now. Oh look, it’s the dean of the diplomatic corps! That sort of thing. 6.43pm: On Fox News, the cynics are out in force. “This is the first election kick-off speech given by a president in the houses of Congress,” says Charles Krauthammer. Like Charles, I’m shocked – shocked! – to hear that politics is going on in the halls of Congress. 6.35pm: If you want to follow the White House’s live video of tonight’s event, then I have the feed for you right here . 6.28pm ET: The White House has just released a set of advance quotes from Obama’s speech: The people of this country work hard to meet their responsibilities. The question tonight is whether we’ll meet ours. The question is whether, in the face of an ongoing national crisis, we can stop the political circus and actually do something to help the economy; whether we can restore some of the fairness and security that has defined this nation since our beginning. Those of us here tonight cannot solve all of our nation’s woes. Ultimately, our recovery will be driven not by Washington, but by our businesses and our workers. But we can help. We can make a difference. There are steps we can take right now to improve people’s lives. I am sending this Congress a plan that you should pass right away. It’s called the American Jobs Act. There should be nothing controversial about this piece of legislation. Everything in here is the kind of proposal that’s been supported by both Democrats and Republicans – including many who sit here tonight. And everything in this bill will be paid for. Everything. The purpose of the American Jobs Act is simple: to put more people back to work and more money in the pockets of those who are working. It will create more jobs for construction workers, more jobs for teachers, more jobs for veterans, and more jobs for the long-term unemployed. It will provide a tax break for companies who hire new workers, and it will cut payroll taxes in half for every working American and every small business. It will provide a jolt to an economy that has stalled, and give companies confidence that if they invest and hire, there will be customers for their products and services. You should pass this jobs plan right away. 6.02pm ET: Guess who’s coming to the big speech tonight? There are duelling parties of guests invited by the White House and Republicans to sit in the visitors gallery: The guests who will be seated with First Lady Michelle Obama all point to elements of the president’s plan he will discuss tonight, a set of proposals he’s calling the “American Jobs Act.” Some of them also just so happen to hail from swing states that the White House wouldn’t mind garnering some favorable coverage in. They include an Iowa business executive who took part in Obama’s recent Rural Economic Forum, a small business owner in Charlotte, North Carolina, a Navy veteran from Minnesota looking to re-enter the private sector workforce, and a Cleveland school teacher who could be laid off because of local budget cuts. Preamble: Tonight President Obama delivers a crucial speech on his plans for the US economy and joblessness to a special joint session of Congress, to be televisied live at 7pm ET (midnight BST). In the past Obama has relied on his ability to give a big, high profile speech to gain political momentum and assauge his critics. This time – with the American economy in the doldrums, unemployment stubbornly high at 9%, increased public discontent and intransigent opposition from the Republican opposition – Obama’s rhetorical skills may have met their match. What can we expect from Obama’s speech? The emphasis will be solidly on jobs and job creation, the key political fact of the last 12 months as hopes for a recovery has first faded and then disappeared. More specifically, according to the heavily trailed contents, Obama plans to offer some specific spending increases and tax cuts designed to restart job creation. How or if he can pay for them depends on how much he can win over the Republicans who control the House of Representatives. With a presidential election looming next year, Republicans have little incentive to save Obama’s own job. But opinion polls show rising dissatisfaction with the response of the Republican party in Congress. While Obama’s popularity has slipped to new lows, he is still better liked that Congressional Republicans. So what will we learn tonight? According to the Washington Post, not much blue sky as opposed to more of the same, with perhaps $300bn in new spending: The president’s plan, in large part, will call for continuing current measures to stimulate the economy, including a 2 percentage-point payroll-tax cut and extended unemployment benefits, administration officials say. Obama is also likely to call for an additional tax cut for companies that hire workers. Those measures together could cost about $200 billion next year. Obama is planning to propose $100 billion or more in spending on infrastructure, state and local aid, and programs that target people who have been unemployed for more than six months, according to officials and other people familiar with the deliberations. Not only will he pledge new spending to spur hiring, he is also likely to call for overhauling the way the government spends money. This could include an infrastructure bank that would pool tens of billions of federal dollars with state or private money to build roads and commercial buildings and to rehabilitate schools. Obama has suggested that the initiatives could lead to the hiring of one million unemployed construction workers. Will Republicans go for it? According to the New York Times , possibly some GOP members might like tax cuts: This week, Senator Scott P Brown, a Republican from Massachusetts, became one of the first in his party to call the tax cut “a policy that we should all support.” Jon M Huntsman Jr, the former Utah governor who is running for president, has said he thinks the cut is a good idea. On Wednesday, Representative Eric Cantor, the House majority leader, said that the tax cut “is something I supported in the past,” and that the matter “will be part of the discussions ongoing.” (Two weeks ago his spokesman, Brad Dayspring, said that Mr Cantor “has long believed that there are better ways to grow the economy and create jobs than temporary tax relief.”) House Speaker John A Boehner also said Thursday morning, in response to a question concerning the tax relief, that he was open to what the president had to say. For more background, my colleagues at the Guardian have put together two excellent guides to the economic data: • How US unemployment has changed over time • US unemployment mapped state by state Before Obama starts speaking at 7pm ET we’ll be covering the build-up, the speech itself and the reaction, including a threatened response by Republican presidential contender Michele Bachmann. And of course you can leave your comments below. United States US economy Barack Obama Obama administration US Congress Live video US economic growth and recession US politics Republicans Economics Richard Adams guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Boehner Invites Gibson Guitar Company CEO To President Obama’s Jobs Speech To Highlight ‘Job-Killing Regulations’

enlarge Credit: Aron Michalski Just in case you haven’t heard, the feds raided the Gibson Guitar Factory recently. NPR has the story : Last week federal marshals raided the Gibson Guitar Corporation in Tennessee. It wasn’t the first time. The government appears to be preparing to charge the famous builder of instruments with trafficking in illegally obtained wood. It’s a rare collision of music and environmental regulation. The raids at two Nashville facilities and one in Memphis recalled a similar raid in Nashville in November 2009, when agents seized a shipment of ebony from Madagascar. They were enforcing the Lacey Act, a century-old endangered species law that was amended in 2008 to include plants as well as animals. But Juszkiewicz says the government won’t tell him exactly how — or if — his company has violated that law. This immediately became a rallying cry for the TeaPublicans to cry about excessive government interference and job-killing federal regulations. Gibson has been raided by the feds before this last one, but no charges have been filed. Yet. The Tennessean : By the time Juszkiewicz (pronounced Juss-ka-witz) reached his office, agents were forensically imaging his computer and carting out boxes of paperwork and company hard drives. At the factories, agents were loading trucks with pallets of rosewood and ebony, guitars, guitar necks, computers and shipping documents. It was the second time in the past two years Gibson had been raided by federal agents in search of illegal imported woods. A 2009 case hasn’t led to any charges against the 117-year-old guitar maker, although it is continuing. In both instances, federal authorities spelled out in search warrants that they suspect the company was illegally importing protected hardwoods from rapidly dwindling rain forests to make prized Gibson guitars. Juszkiewicz is milking his outrage for everything it’s worth, accusing the government of harassing him and, of course, destroying jobs with their federal regulations. Enter John Boehner, Speaker of the House, and the guy not enough in control of his own caucus to get them to show even a modicum of respect and make an appearance at tonight’s joint session of Congress. Despite notable absences by members of the House and Senate, Boehner has invited 13 guests to the speech who, in his view, have been harmed by the federal government’s “job-killing regulations.” One of those guests is Henry Juszkiewicz. Via The Hill , the others are: Lisa Ingram, COO of White Castle, a restaurant chain threatened by the health care law. Jim Plante, CEO of Pathway Genomics, which has been “attacked” by FDA after proposing a merger. Ignacio Urrabazo, president of Commerce Bank of Laredo, Texas, which has been blocked from some lending activity by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Jack Earle, managing partner of Earle Enterprises, who has claimed harm from healthcare and financial regulations. Glenn Rieger, general partner at NewSpring Capital, which has cited problems with regulations from Sarbanes-Oxley. Safi Bahcall, CEO of Synta, which Boehner says is being hampered by an “uncompetitive American business environment.” Kalell Isaza Tuzman, CEO of KIT Digital, which has cited problems with Sarbanes-Oxley. Chris George, CEO of CMG Finance, a mortgage company facing higher costs under the healthcare law. Henry Juszkiewicz, CEO of Gibson Guitar Company, which was raided by federal agents who, Boehner’s release said, have not explained reasons for the raid. Gordon Logan, CEO of SportClips, one of the country’s fastest growing hair salon franchises that is also “struggling with the new health care law’s burdensome costs and mandates.” I will grant Boehner this. His choice of invitees does highlight the priorities Republicans have over Democrats. In Republicans’ minds, there can be no pathway to jobs that doesn’t include destruction of the environment, endangering people’s health, and closing those same doors for people to get health care coverage. It is all-or-nothing for them. In the case of Gibson Guitars, the allegations seem to center around Madagascar deforestation and rain forest preservation. From a 2009 New York Times story : “Madagascar has 47 species of rosewood and over 100 ebony species that occur nowhere else, and their exploitation is pushing some to the brink of extinction,” said representatives of the environmental groups WWF, Conservation International, and the Wildlife Conservation Society, in a joint statement issued last week. The decree “legalizes the sale of illegally cut and collected wood onto the market and constitutes a legal incentive for further corruption in the forestry sector,” the statement said. The harvest and export of precious wood from Madagascar, an island nation off Africa’s southeatern coast, is a regular source of controversy. Recent reports from the Madagascar news agency Les Nouvelles, for example, suggested that 176 containers of illegally harvested hardwood that were seized in July were ultimately allowed to leave the country pending a payment of $37,000 in taxes. The containers were valued at $650,000. The United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization has also reported armed gangs felling and removing rosewood and other endangered trees in Madagascar this year. Gibson guitars are beautiful. We have a very old one in our collection. They’re unique and have great tone. But if I were asked whether it was worth it to destroy rain forests to have one, my answer would be a clear “no”. So let Boehner trot out these CEOs and whine about “job-killing regulations” all he wants. In the end, it’s all for show anyway, since even an announcement of a total suspension of all regulations would still be repudiated by these lunatics as “job-killing”. At this point, it’s all comedy wrapped in tragic outcomes.

Continue reading …

Former Newsweek editor Howard Fineman appeared on Hardball, Thursday, to attack Rick Perry's climate change skepticism as a ” war of the worlds between science and faith .” Dismissing anyone who isn't sold on global warming as not logical, Fineman scoffed,

Continue reading …
Andrea Mitchell Falsely Accuses Boehner of Being ‘Disrespectful’ to Obama

Apparently the media civility police have become so sensitive to any slight of President Obama that MSNBC host Andrea Mitchell actually invented one such controversy out of thin air during her 1 p.m. ET hour show on Thursday. [ Audio available here ] Speaking to Obama advisor Melody Barnes, Mitchell declared: “John Boehner today just slammed the President and said, you know, that the American people shouldn't be forced to watch some politician they don't want to listen to and frankly, most of them would rather watch a football game. Is that disrespectful?”

Continue reading …
Palestinians to push ahead with bid for UN membership despite pressure

Statehood would give Palestinians greater leverage in fighting Israeli occupation, says Mahmoud Abbas The Palestinian president has insisted that last-ditch diplomatic efforts to avert a collision at the United Nations over the Palestinians’ bid for statehood came too late and they would forge ahead despite being “under pressure from the world”. “Whatever the pressures, we’re going to the UN to submit our application for the membership. We know that many countries do not agree with us, do not like this idea, but we will go there,” Mahmoud Abbas said at his presidential compound in Ramallah. He said he would only reconsider his bid for recognition of a Palestinian state at the UN if a return to negotiations with the Israelis on the basis of the pre-1967 borders and a total freeze on settlement building was offered. But the US and Europe had been too slow in harnessing diplomatic energy to the issue, he said. “To be frank with you, they came too late. They wasted all the time from the beginning of this year … til today or yesterday, they wasted all this time. Now when they come here to tell us, okay we have this idea or this package and don’t go to the UN, we will not accept it.” The Palestinian delegation would arrive in New York on 19 September and would submit its application to be accepted as a member of the world body in the following days. “Everything is ready, everything is in hand,” he said. The application would first be submitted to the security council, whose approval is required for full membership, despite the US saying it would veto such a move. The Palestinians may then seek recognition short of member status at the general assembly, which needs a two-thirds majority. Pressure over their chosen course was intense. “Everyone is asking us to do or not to do, to change our minds,” Abbas said. The Palestinians did not want confrontation, “neither with America nor with anyone else”, but “there will be confrontation”. Statehood, said Abbas, would give the Palestinians greater leverage in fighting the Israeli occupation. “It means we will be a state under occupation. Israel now says [East Jerusalem and the West Bank] is a disputed area and they can build settlements everywhere. They do not recognise that this is Palestinian territory. When we are a state … we will negotiate accordingly with the Israelis, of course with the support of the UN.” The Palestinians would argue at the UN that they were “the only people still under occupation, not just after 63 years but more than five centuries – since the Ottomans to the British Mandate and now to the Israelis. We want our independence.” Israel fears that membership of the UN would also allow the Palestinians to bring cases against it at the international criminal court. Abbas said such a move would only be necessary if Israel acted in violation of international law. “You are obliged to go [to the ICC] because somebody takes your rights, attacks you, or whatever it is,” he said. “We don’t want to go to the ICC for nothing. Tell the Israelis not to attack the Palestinians, and we will not go there. When you see the settlers every day burning mosques, cutting [down] trees – who prevents them?” The threat from Congress to cut financial aid to the Palestinians if they pursue their UN strategy was a problem, he said. “We think the US is an honest broker. If they cut their aid to us, then it will be a different situation.” He did not want his “good relations” with the US to be jeopardised, he said. “I want to keep my relations. But if they don’t want that, it’s up to them.” The Palestinian leadership had given strict instructions to avoid violent confrontation with Israeli security forces in the coming weeks and months he said. “From our side there will be no confrontation, no chaos. I don’t want any friction between us and the Israelis.” Palestinian security forces had been told to avoid provocation. But, he said, “we are afraid that the Israelis will send the settlers and the dogs to attack the Palestinians”. On Thursday, olive trees were uprooted, cars set ablaze and a mosque vandalised near Nablus, according to Palestinian officials. As Palestinian officials spoke of mounting pressure from the US, Israel’s ambassador to the UN, Ron Prosor, said his country was “in a battle to stem the tide” in world opinion. In an interview with the Israeli newspaper Ma’ariv, he said: “This is a diplomatic endeavour against all odds. I am trying, literally down to the last moment, to persuade the ambassadors of UN member countries that this unilateral course of action by the Palestinians won’t lead to peace and won’t lead to the establishment of a Palestinian state, but only to violence and bloodshed.” The Palestinians had an automatic majority in the general assembly, he said. “It is clear to me that we can’t win the vote.” Israel was instead trying to enlarge its “moral minority” at the world body. Palestinian territories Israel Middle East Mahmoud Abbas United Nations US foreign policy Harriet Sherwood guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
MP hits out at IPCC for leaving Mark Duggan’s family ‘floundering’

David Lammy says the family of the man whose death sparked rioting in Tottenham were not told what was happening The Independent Police complaints commission has been criticised by the MP David Lammy for leaving the family of Mark Duggan “floundering” and for failing to robustly communicate its independence after his death. Lammy, the MP for Tottenham, was speaking on the eve of the funeral of the 29-year-old, who was fatally shot by police on 4 August and whose death is the subject of an investigation by the police watchdog. Giving evidence on Thursday to MPs on the home affairs select committee, Lammy said confidence in the police from members of his community, who had seen their area devastated by looting and disorder, had taken a huge knock. “For any community to have suffered two riots in a generation – I can think of cities in America that have been here and it’s pretty bleak – 99% of people in Tottenham are horrified at the violence, horrified at knife crime and gang members, and (they are people) who need policing and there has been a real confidence kick.” He told MPs that the fatal shooting of Duggan was an event that could have led to disorder but that neither the police nor the IPCC, he suggested, appeared to have taken that into account in their handling of events. Addressing the actions of the IPCC in the immediate aftermath of the shooting, he criticised its failure to demonstrate its independence clearly. “This was a sort of perfect storm of a catalogue of errors, that could have avoided riots on the scale that we saw,” said Lammy. “A death of this kind we know from experience in London can trigger unrest. Now, in the old days, the police would immediately start investigating themselves and there would be a lot of suspicion about where that would end. “The good news is that now we have the IPCC and the IPCC stepped in very early. The bad news is the family was then left floundering. “I am not sure the communication of the IPCC worked. The need for an active, visible press conference where they say they will get to the bottom of this quickly – that did not happen.” He said securing community confidence was essential in the immediate aftermath of the shooting and that had not happened. Speaking to the Guardian after the committee, Lammy said: “The central challenge to the IPCC in relation to a community like Tottenham is to establish their independence and that is still a work in progress – they still have a job to do.” A spokesman for the IPCC said: “We have acknowledged to Mr Duggan’s family, in public and by way of the home affairs select committee, that there are lessons to be learned from the communications in the early hours after the death of Mark Duggan. We are engaging directly with community representatives to understand their concerns, and we are actively looking at what could have been done better, not just on the part of the IPCC but the system as a whole.” “The IPCC has to understand that communication to a community like mine, with 200 different languages, is really critical. They needed to be on Sky TV, they needed to be on News 24, they needed to be on pirate radio stations showing their face, and they weren’t.” The funeral, which is expected to be attended by up to 3,000 people, is taking place this morning. The cortege will pass slowly through the Broadwater Farm estate, where Duggan grew up, and come to a halt at the New Testament Church of God in Wood Green for a private service. Duggan’s family have requested privacy and have told the police that they want the funeral to be “local, peaceful and dignified”. Earlier this week they met the new police commander for the area, Mak Chishty, to discuss the funeral plans. While the number of police in London is still at a record high, with around 10,000 officers available on the streets, the presence at the funeral will be low-key and will involve local officers. Inquest, the organisation that helps families of those who are killed after contact with the police, said the family had requested that the media stay outside the church, where facilities have been set up. After the service, family members will travel to Wood Green cemetery, and then to a reception at the Broadwater Farm community centre. Speaking on behalf of the Duggan family, Inquest said: “The family will not be speaking to the media and ask that they are respectfully left in peace.” Mark Duggan UK riots Independent Police Complaints Commission David Lammy Crime London Police Metropolitan police Sandra Laville guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
MP hits out at IPCC for leaving Mark Duggan’s family ‘floundering’

David Lammy says the family of the man whose death sparked rioting in Tottenham were not told what was happening The Independent Police complaints commission has been criticised by the MP David Lammy for leaving the family of Mark Duggan “floundering” and for failing to robustly communicate its independence after his death. Lammy, the MP for Tottenham, was speaking on the eve of the funeral of the 29-year-old, who was fatally shot by police on 4 August and whose death is the subject of an investigation by the police watchdog. Giving evidence on Thursday to MPs on the home affairs select committee, Lammy said confidence in the police from members of his community, who had seen their area devastated by looting and disorder, had taken a huge knock. “For any community to have suffered two riots in a generation – I can think of cities in America that have been here and it’s pretty bleak – 99% of people in Tottenham are horrified at the violence, horrified at knife crime and gang members, and (they are people) who need policing and there has been a real confidence kick.” He told MPs that the fatal shooting of Duggan was an event that could have led to disorder but that neither the police nor the IPCC, he suggested, appeared to have taken that into account in their handling of events. Addressing the actions of the IPCC in the immediate aftermath of the shooting, he criticised its failure to demonstrate its independence clearly. “This was a sort of perfect storm of a catalogue of errors, that could have avoided riots on the scale that we saw,” said Lammy. “A death of this kind we know from experience in London can trigger unrest. Now, in the old days, the police would immediately start investigating themselves and there would be a lot of suspicion about where that would end. “The good news is that now we have the IPCC and the IPCC stepped in very early. The bad news is the family was then left floundering. “I am not sure the communication of the IPCC worked. The need for an active, visible press conference where they say they will get to the bottom of this quickly – that did not happen.” He said securing community confidence was essential in the immediate aftermath of the shooting and that had not happened. Speaking to the Guardian after the committee, Lammy said: “The central challenge to the IPCC in relation to a community like Tottenham is to establish their independence and that is still a work in progress – they still have a job to do.” A spokesman for the IPCC said: “We have acknowledged to Mr Duggan’s family, in public and by way of the home affairs select committee, that there are lessons to be learned from the communications in the early hours after the death of Mark Duggan. We are engaging directly with community representatives to understand their concerns, and we are actively looking at what could have been done better, not just on the part of the IPCC but the system as a whole.” “The IPCC has to understand that communication to a community like mine, with 200 different languages, is really critical. They needed to be on Sky TV, they needed to be on News 24, they needed to be on pirate radio stations showing their face, and they weren’t.” The funeral, which is expected to be attended by up to 3,000 people, is taking place this morning. The cortege will pass slowly through the Broadwater Farm estate, where Duggan grew up, and come to a halt at the New Testament Church of God in Wood Green for a private service. Duggan’s family have requested privacy and have told the police that they want the funeral to be “local, peaceful and dignified”. Earlier this week they met the new police commander for the area, Mak Chishty, to discuss the funeral plans. While the number of police in London is still at a record high, with around 10,000 officers available on the streets, the presence at the funeral will be low-key and will involve local officers. Inquest, the organisation that helps families of those who are killed after contact with the police, said the family had requested that the media stay outside the church, where facilities have been set up. After the service, family members will travel to Wood Green cemetery, and then to a reception at the Broadwater Farm community centre. Speaking on behalf of the Duggan family, Inquest said: “The family will not be speaking to the media and ask that they are respectfully left in peace.” Mark Duggan UK riots Independent Police Complaints Commission David Lammy Crime London Police Metropolitan police Sandra Laville guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

From MoveOn.org — Dear Paul Ryan, I’d Like To Ask You A Question But I Don’t Want To Be Arrested . From their You Tube channel: Rep. Paul Ryan’s only August appearance is at this $15 a ticket “townhall”, where he refuses to speak directly with his constituents–who are demanding real answers. Instead? He has them arrested. Call Rep. Ryan and tell him: That’s not how we do things in America. Apparently daring to ask Paul Ryan why he wants to destroy our social safety nets is a reason to get arrested in America these days. Here’s his contact page and if you do call, be polite please but let him know how you feel about this. Contact Paul

Continue reading …