Shia Muslims travelling to holy shrine in Syria shot by gang at fake security checkpoint in western province Gunmen killed 22 Shia pilgrims in an ambush in Iraq’s western province of Anbar on Monday, a police official said. They were travelling from Karbala, amongst the holiest of Shia cities, on a trip north to another holy shrine in neighbouring Syria. The bodies were discovered late on Monday night, hours after the gang of gunmen stopped the bus at a fake security checkpoint and told all the women to get off, according to one official who interviewed a survivor. The gunmen drove the bus a few miles off the main highway in the Sunni-dominated Anbar province. The pilgrims were ordered off the bus and shot one by one. “There was a big bus and a mini bus containing 30 people, including 22 men and eight women,” Major General Hadi Razij, head of Anbar police, told Reuters. “They took the men and they left the women. They killed the 22 men.” Security officials and a political leader from Karbala confirmed the shooting details. All spoke on condition of anonymity because they are not authorised to release information. While violence has dropped in Iraq from the height of sectarian fighting in 2006-07, killings and bombings remain a daily occurrence more than eight years after the 2003 US-led invasion. The sprawling desert province of Anbar was the heartland of a Sunni Islamist insurgency after the invasion, and its main cities, Ramadi and Falluja, saw some of the fiercest fighting of the war. In April 2007, some 110 people were killed and hundreds injured in bombing attacks on holy sites in Karbala, considered the second most important city for Shia Muslims. Iraq Middle East Global terrorism guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …The 50-state blog roundup has existed over the years in various forms. The idea is to take a look at state and local blogs in order to see what important things are going on in state politics and campaigns, to get a preview of what’s coming to the national stage and to recognize the work of great state and local bloggers. Alabama: Left in Alabama: State Democratic Party Chair Mark Kennedy is apparently a man of honor. Alaska: Mudflats: “One Anchorage” is fighting to protect the rights of the LGBT community. Arizona: Blog for Arizona: The Pima County Republicans’ recent Glock raffle is part of a long pattern of gun fetishism. Arkansas: Blue Arkansas: Republican State Senator Bruce Holland was convicted of numerous crimes associated with endangering the lives of others while running from the police. California: Calitics: The American Chemistry Council is spending big bucks to buy the right to keep using toxic chemicals. Colorado: Square State: Denver Public Schools are doing a good job teaching students who are learning English for the first time, will they be allowed to continue doing so? Connecticut: My Left Nutmeg: Linda McMahon is running again. Delaware: Delaware Liberal: Conservatived are launching “State Legislators for Legal Immigration.” Florida: The Progressive Professor: Pondering what things would be like if September 11th hadn’t happened. Georgia: Blog for Democracy: Troy Davis is set to be executed in 10 days for a crime he may not have committed. Hawaii: Haven’t found any progressive blogs for this state yet. Idaho: No recent posts Illinois: Progress Illinois: Rep. Adam Kinzinger rubs elbows with rich business interests while ignoring his constituents. Indiana: No recent posts. Iowa: Bleeding Heartland: Is Christie Vilsack’s congressional run causing her husband, U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack, ethical problems? Kansas: The Kansas Free Press: Is the state going to spend millions of dollars promoting “faith-based marriage.” Kentucky: Page One: Teabaggers in Kentucky are pushing a fiscally irresponsible candidate for auditor. Louisiana: Daily Kingfish: Democratic politics in the state suffered a major loss this week as labor leader Vic Bussie passed away. Maine: Dirigo Blue: Maine Republicans are trying to disenfranchise students. Maryland: Maryland Juice: Maryland Republicans can’t handle money very well. Massachusetts: Blue Mass Group: Conservative activists in Massachusetts are engaging in illegal fundraising, it seems. Michigan: Michigan Liberal: Republican Paul Scott is facing a recall. Minnesota: MN Progressive Project: Rep. Chip Cravaack continues to show his hypocrisy knows no bounds. Mississippi: A Liberal In the Midst: There are serious questions about how progressive the Democratic gubernatorial nominee is. Missouri: Fired Up Missouri: Rep. Todd Akin says the EPA, Education and Energy Departments are unconstitutional. Montana: Montana Cowgirl: Republicans are wasting taxpayer money on bogus voter fraud charges. Nebraska: New Nebraska Network: Sen. Mike Johanns really is on point with the nonsensical right-wing talking points about government regulation. Nevada: Las Vegas Gleaner: Exploring the connection between creationism and those who deny global warming. New Hampshire: Blue Hampshire: New Hampshire has also lost a progressive icon, Bernard Boutin. New Jersey: Blue Jersey: Chris Christie, Speaker Sheila Oliver and a whole lot of shenanigans in New Jersey politics. New Mexico: Clearly New Mexico: State residents are certainly not happy with Gov. Susana Martinez and her right-wing agenda — they’re taking to the streets in protest. New York: The Albany Project: Words about 9/11 from those who were there. North Carolina: Blue NC: State senate leaders are trying to hide the fact that they are debating a marriage amendment. North Dakota: North Decoder: Senate Majority Leader Ryan Taylor may be running for governor, which could be a good thing. Ohio: Plunderbund: Gov. John Kasich fearmongers on the issue of overturning his bill to destroy collective bargaining. Oklahoma: Blue Oklahoma: Hw the state would benefit from the American Jobs Act. Oregon: Blue Oregon: Meet Congressional Candidate, apparently a good liberal, Brad Avakian. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania Progressive: The state of working Pennsylvania. Rhode Island: RI Future: It appears that state Republican have ousted “racist homophobe” Daniel Gordon. South Carolina: SC Prog Blog: Carolina Democrats are fighting voter disenfranchisement. South Dakota: Madville Times: Apparently the rent is too damn high for Dakota Republicans. Tennessee: KnoxViews: Can you help a progressive blogger in Tennessee who lost everything in a fire that destroyed home and business. Texas: Off the Kuff: Texas is getting gayer. Utah: The Side Track: Lamenting the growth of anti-intellectual opposition to expertise. Vermont: Green Mountain Daily: Lots of questions in Vermont about how to deal with the aftermath of Tropical Storm Irene. Virginia: Not Larry Sabato: Republicans have candidates in 100% of the white-majority districts in the state senate. Washington: Horse’s Ass: State Republicans are in midlife crisis mode. West Virginia: West Virginia Blue: Democrats are looking good in the governor’s race. Wisconsin: Blue Cheddar: People who paid to attend a Paul Ryan luncheon were arrested for asking questions. Wyoming: Haven’t found any progressive blogs for this state yet. The list used to create the post can be found here . If you know of a progressive state or local blog that isn’t on the list, e-mail me at quinnelk@hotmail.com and I’ll add it.
Continue reading …Lady Eliza Manningham-Buller says dialogue with terror groups, including al-Qaida, requires courage but ‘is necessary’ The former head of MI5, Lady Eliza Manningham-Buller, has delivered an impassioned defence of talking to terrorists, even to elements of al-Qaida. “Dialogue, even with terrorists, is necessary”, she told an invited audience at the recording of her third and final BBC Reith lecture, on the theme Securing Freedom, in the British Library in central London. “Talking doesn’t mean approval”, she said. “It’s a way of exploring peaceful options, what compromises, if any, can be reached”. She added it required courage by governments. She continued: “Not all terrorist are evil, though their acts are”. There were people in al-Qaida who were tired of terror and already prepared to help the west. She said she was not suggesting “rushing off to do it tomorrow” but to consider which “components” of al-Qaida western interests could speak to. She has already provoked some of her former political masters in Tony Blair’s government by attacking the invasion of Iraq and decrying the term “war on terror”, in her earlier Reith lectures. On Monday, she went further, saying it was important “to try and reduce terrorism by talking to its advocates”. It was important, she said, to keep a “rational perspective” about the risks of terrorism. Politicians “lose their way” if they become too apprehensive about how the media would respond to terrorist attacks, she said. Attacking the many anti-terrorist laws passed by the Labour government, she spoke of “unnecessary” and “unproductive” measures. “The rush to legislation after an atrocity is often a mistake.” British governments, she said, had talked to the Provisional IRA in Northern Ireland. She said she would not exclude talking now to dissident Republican groups there. Asked after her lecture whether the west should talk to Hamas, the militant group governing Gaza, she replied: “I believe talks are going on. I’m not going to say more than that”. She described the use of intelligence agencies in “deniable” operations as “quite useful”. MI6 carried out back-channel talks with the IRA under the Thatcher government though it is unclear exactly what ministers knew about them. It is also unclear what ministers knew about MI6 involvement in “rendering” Libyan dissidents and terror suspects to Muammar Gaddafi’s security forces in 2003. There is a question, Manningham-Buller, who was head of MI5 at the time, said “whether the UK supped with a sufficiently long spoon”. She made it clear in an earlier Reith lecture that, in her view, the activities of MI6 were wrong. She is expected to give evidence to the Gibson inquiry into allegations of British collusion in the torture and the abuse of detainees. Her lecture, the third on the theme, Securing Freedom, will be broadcast on BBC Radio 4 on 20 September. UK security and terrorism Global terrorism Terrorism policy al-Qaida MI5 MI6 IRA Hamas Palestinian territories Labour Libya Middle East Africa Richard Norton-Taylor guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Lady Eliza Manningham-Buller says dialogue with terror groups, including al-Qaida, requires courage but ‘is necessary’ The former head of MI5, Lady Eliza Manningham-Buller, has delivered an impassioned defence of talking to terrorists, even to elements of al-Qaida. “Dialogue, even with terrorists, is necessary”, she told an invited audience at the recording of her third and final BBC Reith lecture, on the theme Securing Freedom, in the British Library in central London. “Talking doesn’t mean approval”, she said. “It’s a way of exploring peaceful options, what compromises, if any, can be reached”. She added it required courage by governments. She continued: “Not all terrorist are evil, though their acts are”. There were people in al-Qaida who were tired of terror and already prepared to help the west. She said she was not suggesting “rushing off to do it tomorrow” but to consider which “components” of al-Qaida western interests could speak to. She has already provoked some of her former political masters in Tony Blair’s government by attacking the invasion of Iraq and decrying the term “war on terror”, in her earlier Reith lectures. On Monday, she went further, saying it was important “to try and reduce terrorism by talking to its advocates”. It was important, she said, to keep a “rational perspective” about the risks of terrorism. Politicians “lose their way” if they become too apprehensive about how the media would respond to terrorist attacks, she said. Attacking the many anti-terrorist laws passed by the Labour government, she spoke of “unnecessary” and “unproductive” measures. “The rush to legislation after an atrocity is often a mistake.” British governments, she said, had talked to the Provisional IRA in Northern Ireland. She said she would not exclude talking now to dissident Republican groups there. Asked after her lecture whether the west should talk to Hamas, the militant group governing Gaza, she replied: “I believe talks are going on. I’m not going to say more than that”. She described the use of intelligence agencies in “deniable” operations as “quite useful”. MI6 carried out back-channel talks with the IRA under the Thatcher government though it is unclear exactly what ministers knew about them. It is also unclear what ministers knew about MI6 involvement in “rendering” Libyan dissidents and terror suspects to Muammar Gaddafi’s security forces in 2003. There is a question, Manningham-Buller, who was head of MI5 at the time, said “whether the UK supped with a sufficiently long spoon”. She made it clear in an earlier Reith lecture that, in her view, the activities of MI6 were wrong. She is expected to give evidence to the Gibson inquiry into allegations of British collusion in the torture and the abuse of detainees. Her lecture, the third on the theme, Securing Freedom, will be broadcast on BBC Radio 4 on 20 September. UK security and terrorism Global terrorism Terrorism policy al-Qaida MI5 MI6 IRA Hamas Palestinian territories Labour Libya Middle East Africa Richard Norton-Taylor guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Convicted fraudster Michael Brown traced to Caribbean while his multiple identities raise questions for UK officials Waiters in the hotels along Punta Cana beach, a curve of white sand on the easternmost tip of the Dominican Republic, say the Scottish man in bermuda shorts is known as the owner of Charlie, a rottweiler-alsatian cross which is usually by his side. The pair have been seen in the Caribbean surf where Charlie liked to gnaw at discarded coconut shells. Last month, they were spotted in a gold Porsche Cayenne 4×4 as it bounced along the potholed roads to an exclusive golf course. But the dog’s owner, the Liberal Democrats’ fugitive donor Michael Brown, could not let the opportunity pass for a bitter joke at the expense of the party he once bankrolled. A former business associate claims Brown’s pet is named after Charles Kennedy, the ex-leader of the Liberal Democrats who accepted his gift. “He told me that he had given money to a political party and that his puppy was named after the leader. He thought it was funny,” said the one-time friend. Today the Guardian can reveal that fraudulently acquired legal documents enabled Brown to escape justice and begin a new life in the Caribbean. Brown, who gave the Lib Dems £2.4m of stolen money before being convicted of theft in his absence, duped the British authorities into giving him a passport under the name of Darren Patrick Nally in June 2008. At the time he was on bail in connection with a £60m fraud. The passport allowed him to leave Britain for a new, anonymous life in the Dominican Republic. Flitting between at least three properties nestled on white sand beaches and manicured golf courses, he applied for temporary residency and even enrolled on the country’s electoral register. Disclosure of the false passport raises serious questions for the Identity and Passport Service. At the time, images of Brown had featured in dozens of news articles and television programmes because of his sizeable gift to a political party. He already had a conviction from 2006 for obtaining a passport by deception. His fake passport enabled him to acquire the false Dominican documents. It is understood that police are investigating claims that he has acquired other British passports under stolen identities. The documents also show how Brown has changed his appearance while at the top of the City of London police’s most wanted list and on Crimestoppers’ most wanted list. While on the run, Brown was convicted and sentenced to seven years’ imprisonment for the theft of £8m, although the court was told he had stolen around £60m. Despite a court ruling that found that Brown’s donor firm 5th Avenue Partners was wholly fraudulent, Nick Clegg has refused to return the money that came from it. The Lib Dems have claimed that it was accepted in good faith. In his passport photograph, applied for in June 2008, Brown has grown a beard and his temples have gone grey. He had previously been clean-shaven and used to dye his hair strawberry blond. He may have been attempting to look a little older. Brown was then aged 42, while the real owner of his new identity was 47. Brown persuaded a judge that he was not a flight risk and should no longer have to wear an electronic tag. Living under strict bail conditions in Hampstead, north London, he had been forced to hand over his real passport and was expected to check in with police twice a week. In fact Brown had gone to great lengths to acquire a number of documents bearing false names while awaiting trial. He used the name Michael Brown when his local council registered him in August 2007, but in September he returned a document to Camden electoral services stating that his surname should be registered as Campbell-Brown. He used this name to set up bank accounts with Capital One and NatWest at a time when his assets were frozen by a court order. The Dominican documents show that by February 2010, he was sporting a deeper tan. Government officials said Brown’s false British passport would have been one of two documents he used to apply for permission to live in the country. His temporary residency card appears to show that Brown’s adopted identity of Nally is Irish. Brown was in fact born in Scotland and is a UK citizen. Brown’s electoral identity card was registered at Sea Horse Ranch, an exclusive resort in the north of the country where he lived in an £882,000 villa protected by armed security guards. He is said to have lived there for several months at least. Two men suspected of helping him flee Britain and adopt a false identity were arrested and questioned on Friday. The former friend, who says he lost hundred of thousands of dollars in a venture with Brown under his assumed name of Nally, said Brown was angered about the lack of support he had been given by politicians. “Darren gave them money, and they did not look after him,” he said. Marta Palomo, an estate agent who rents a four-bedroom house to Brown in a guarded estate a few hundred metres from the sea, said that she saw him two weeks ago. “I saw him in the house, and have spoken to him in the last week. He is busy, spends a lot of time in the capital city. He has had a place here for years,” she said. “He lives with his dog and a maid comes by and sometimes his wife comes over to visit,” she said. Brown’s wife Sharon Campbell lives in Mallorca. Brown told Palomo last week that he would be going away for a short time because a friend has been in hospital, she said. “I think he is out at the moment because his friend is ill, he has gone to see him in hospital. But I am sure he will be back,” she said. Manuel Angella, a local taxi driver who has driven Brown to the capital city of Santo Domingo, said: “Darren is a very good man. There are many worse people in this world,” he said. City of London police are negotiating to secure Brown’s return. No Briton has ever been forced to return from the Dominican Republic and there is no extradition treaty between the two countries. Liberal Democrats Dominican Republic Party funding Crime Rajeev Syal guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Convicted fraudster Michael Brown traced to Caribbean while his multiple identities raise questions for UK officials Waiters in the hotels along Punta Cana beach, a curve of white sand on the easternmost tip of the Dominican Republic, say the Scottish man in bermuda shorts is known as the owner of Charlie, a rottweiler-alsatian cross which is usually by his side. The pair have been seen in the Caribbean surf where Charlie liked to gnaw at discarded coconut shells. Last month, they were spotted in a gold Porsche Cayenne 4×4 as it bounced along the potholed roads to an exclusive golf course. But the dog’s owner, the Liberal Democrats’ fugitive donor Michael Brown, could not let the opportunity pass for a bitter joke at the expense of the party he once bankrolled. A former business associate claims Brown’s pet is named after Charles Kennedy, the ex-leader of the Liberal Democrats who accepted his gift. “He told me that he had given money to a political party and that his puppy was named after the leader. He thought it was funny,” said the one-time friend. Today the Guardian can reveal that fraudulently acquired legal documents enabled Brown to escape justice and begin a new life in the Caribbean. Brown, who gave the Lib Dems £2.4m of stolen money before being convicted of theft in his absence, duped the British authorities into giving him a passport under the name of Darren Patrick Nally in June 2008. At the time he was on bail in connection with a £60m fraud. The passport allowed him to leave Britain for a new, anonymous life in the Dominican Republic. Flitting between at least three properties nestled on white sand beaches and manicured golf courses, he applied for temporary residency and even enrolled on the country’s electoral register. Disclosure of the false passport raises serious questions for the Identity and Passport Service. At the time, images of Brown had featured in dozens of news articles and television programmes because of his sizeable gift to a political party. He already had a conviction from 2006 for obtaining a passport by deception. His fake passport enabled him to acquire the false Dominican documents. It is understood that police are investigating claims that he has acquired other British passports under stolen identities. The documents also show how Brown has changed his appearance while at the top of the City of London police’s most wanted list and on Crimestoppers’ most wanted list. While on the run, Brown was convicted and sentenced to seven years’ imprisonment for the theft of £8m, although the court was told he had stolen around £60m. Despite a court ruling that found that Brown’s donor firm 5th Avenue Partners was wholly fraudulent, Nick Clegg has refused to return the money that came from it. The Lib Dems have claimed that it was accepted in good faith. In his passport photograph, applied for in June 2008, Brown has grown a beard and his temples have gone grey. He had previously been clean-shaven and used to dye his hair strawberry blond. He may have been attempting to look a little older. Brown was then aged 42, while the real owner of his new identity was 47. Brown persuaded a judge that he was not a flight risk and should no longer have to wear an electronic tag. Living under strict bail conditions in Hampstead, north London, he had been forced to hand over his real passport and was expected to check in with police twice a week. In fact Brown had gone to great lengths to acquire a number of documents bearing false names while awaiting trial. He used the name Michael Brown when his local council registered him in August 2007, but in September he returned a document to Camden electoral services stating that his surname should be registered as Campbell-Brown. He used this name to set up bank accounts with Capital One and NatWest at a time when his assets were frozen by a court order. The Dominican documents show that by February 2010, he was sporting a deeper tan. Government officials said Brown’s false British passport would have been one of two documents he used to apply for permission to live in the country. His temporary residency card appears to show that Brown’s adopted identity of Nally is Irish. Brown was in fact born in Scotland and is a UK citizen. Brown’s electoral identity card was registered at Sea Horse Ranch, an exclusive resort in the north of the country where he lived in an £882,000 villa protected by armed security guards. He is said to have lived there for several months at least. Two men suspected of helping him flee Britain and adopt a false identity were arrested and questioned on Friday. The former friend, who says he lost hundred of thousands of dollars in a venture with Brown under his assumed name of Nally, said Brown was angered about the lack of support he had been given by politicians. “Darren gave them money, and they did not look after him,” he said. Marta Palomo, an estate agent who rents a four-bedroom house to Brown in a guarded estate a few hundred metres from the sea, said that she saw him two weeks ago. “I saw him in the house, and have spoken to him in the last week. He is busy, spends a lot of time in the capital city. He has had a place here for years,” she said. “He lives with his dog and a maid comes by and sometimes his wife comes over to visit,” she said. Brown’s wife Sharon Campbell lives in Mallorca. Brown told Palomo last week that he would be going away for a short time because a friend has been in hospital, she said. “I think he is out at the moment because his friend is ill, he has gone to see him in hospital. But I am sure he will be back,” she said. Manuel Angella, a local taxi driver who has driven Brown to the capital city of Santo Domingo, said: “Darren is a very good man. There are many worse people in this world,” he said. City of London police are negotiating to secure Brown’s return. No Briton has ever been forced to return from the Dominican Republic and there is no extradition treaty between the two countries. Liberal Democrats Dominican Republic Party funding Crime Rajeev Syal guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Bank of America has made it official: They plan to lay off 30,000 employees to bolster their bottom line and keep stock prices high. Via Wall Street Journal : We knew the Bank of America ax was going to fall, but we didn’t quite know the number. Today — after BofA CEO Brian Moynihan made no direct mention of job cuts during an investor presentation — the bank said it will cut about 30,000 jobs over the next few years. The job cuts are part of the first phase of a sweeping Bank of America efficiency drive. BofA said in a statement that attrition and leaving vacant jobs unfilled with be a “significant part” of the expected headcount cuts. That’s a whole lot of attrition. As Laura Clawson over at Daily Kos points out: Dealbook offers some insight into the lack of detail about 30,000 jobs and the emphasis on stock prices: Bank of America just isn’t talking about it. When the bank’s CEO described cost-cutting measures, he didn’t even mention job cuts; that came later, in a statement that offered no specifics. Because to the big banks, jobs just aren’t important. And financial reporters overwhelmingly go along with that. While I agree with that analysis, there’s something else people aren’t talking about here that jumped out at me from this Reuter’s article: The Moynihan speech “was pretty underwhelming. They need to address the bigger issues the bank faces ,” said Jason Ware, equity analyst at Salt Lake City-based Albion Financial Group. Ware is exactly right. The whole “job cuts and attrition” thing is BofA’s way of putting employees on the firing line for continuing mismanagement of their mortgage division. Reuter’s again : Yet it also has one big, fat albatross on its balance sheets: Countrywide Financial. Bank of America acquired Countrywide for $4 billion, a deal that has proven a huge headache not just in dollars and cents, but in terms of the bank’s reputation. “Basically all the mortgages that Countrywide produced from 2004 to 2007 were excrement,” Geracioti says. “The question is: What are Bank of America’s liabilities from Countrywide? Some say $100 billion, others say, ‘Who knows?’ The liabilities could be ginormous. The government is hassling the bank in a big way.” Bank of America has long held that Countrywide’s problems were it own doing. But on September 2, the Federal Housing Finance Agency sued 17 firms – including Bank of America and Countrywide – for violations of federal securities laws in the sale of mortgage-backed securities. In an 88-page filing, the FHFA alleges that around 2005, top executives of Countrywide – which it labels as a “notorious mortgage lender” for its practice – “complained to each other at the time that BOA’s appetite for risky products was greater than that of Countywide.” You just have to love how these executives blame the government “hassling” Bank of America for their woes. Never mind that it’s totally justifiable in light of how desperately they needed to be bailed out when it all came to light. Bank of America has a systemic problem that it’s desperately trying to cover up: It holds billions in toxic mortgages. Those mortgages are probably legally invalid due to the sloppy paperwork/signature issues on many of them, and represent a large chunk of the mortgage scam that landed us in this mess to begin with. The only good thing to come out of this news is the shiny-bright message that corporate tax breaks do NOT create jobs. BofA paid no corporate income taxes in 2009 or 2010, they received a tax refund of nearly $1 billion in 2010. See how that works? No taxes and a big tax refund equals 30,000 lost jobs. Where is the money going? Well, let’s see. In 2011 alone, $1,570,000 has been paid to lobbyists . How many jobs would that money have saved or created? They paid big cash bonuses to executives, too — $900,000 in all, though they did manage to tie payment to stock prices, which have plummeted this year. In 2010, they spread around $1.3 million in campaign contributions, and those are just the ones we know about. How many jobs might that cash have preserved? It’s really difficult for me to weep big tears over BofA’s mortgage troubles, when they were of their own making and when they drove the engine that drove the crisis . If they’re looking to cut costs, they ought to start by dropping executive pay to zero and resolving not to spend even one thin dime lobbying Congress or contributing to candidates. It would be a good start.
Continue reading …