Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 234)
Dominique Strauss-Kahn: maid liaison was moral failing

Former head of IMF speaks of regret about sexual encounter in interview on French television Dominique Strauss-Kahn, the former head of the International Monetary Fund, acknowledged on Sunday that his sexual encounter with a New York hotel maid was a “moral failing” on his part, but didn’t involve violence, constraint or aggression. In his first interview since his arrest over sexual assault accusations, Strauss-Kahn told France’s TF1 television channel what happened between him and the maid, Nafissatou Diallo, “was not only an inappropriate relationship, but more than that, it was an error”. Strauss-Kahn, a Socialist politician who was widely considered a top contender in next year’s presidential race until the case broke, said “it was a failing, a failing vis-a-vis my wife, my children and my friends but also a failing vis-a-vis the French people, who had vested their hopes for change in me. “I think it was a moral failing and I am not proud of it. I regret it infinitely. I have regretted it everyday for the past four months and I think I’m not done regretting it,” he said at the start of the 20-minute interview. Much of the exchange came off as staged, with Strauss-Kahn appearing calm and unruffled throughout and not surprised by the questions. Strauss-Kahn’s initial contrition was peppered with anger at his accuser, a Guinean immigrant who maintained he attacked her after she came into his room at New York’s Sofitel hotel to clean. He said the New York prosecutor concluded “Nafissatou Diallo lied about everything – not only about her past, that’s of no importance, but also about what happened. The[prosecutor's] report says, it’s written there, that ‘she presented so many different versions of what happened that I can’t believe a word’.” Strauss-Kahn suggested that financial motives might have been behind Diallo’s accusations. He also dismissed as “imaginary” a separate claim by a French writer that he tried to rape her during a 2003 interview, again insisting “no act of aggression, no violence” had taken place between the two. Because a police investigation into Tristane Banon’s claim is ongoing, Strauss-Kahn said he would not say anything more about the matter. If Paris prosecutors decide to pursue the case, Strauss-Kahn could face a possible trial. New York prosecutors dropped all criminal charges against him in the Diallo case last month, though Strauss-Kahn is still facing a lawsuit brought by the maid. Asked whether he had any intention of returning to politics, Strauss-Kahn said he would “take time to reflect” and rest first. “But all my life was consecrated to being useful to the public good,” he said, adding “we will see”. Dominique Strauss-Kahn France New York Europe United States guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Pressure on attorney general to block Met move against press freedom

Dominic Grieve urged to stop police using Official Secrets Act to force Guardian to reveal sources in phone hacking case The attorney general, Dominic Grieve, is facing growing pressure to block an attempt by the Metropolitan police to use the Official Secrets Act to force journalists to reveal their sources. As senior Liberal Democrats indicated that Nick Clegg was “sympathetic” to journalists, police sources also expressed unease after Scotland Yard applied last week for an order under the 1989 act to require the Guardian to identify its sources on phone hacking. One police source said the decision to invoke the act was “likely to end in tears” for the Met. Lib Dem sources said that as deputy prime minister, Clegg was unable to express a view on what action the attorney general should take. But senior Lib Dems lined up at the party conference in Birmingham to call on the attorney general to use his powers to rule that the Yard’s use of the act is not in the public interest. Simon Hughes, the Lib Dem deputy leader, who is suing News International over alleged phone hacking at the News of the World, said: “Millions of people believe the Guardian has done a public service by exposing the series of scandals behind phone hacking carried out on a regular basis by individuals on behalf of other media organisations like the Murdoch empire. It is entirely inappropriate for the Officials Secret Act to be used to try to prosecute journalists who have taken these actions. “I hope that the law officers, or the government more widely, will make it clear that such an intervention and such a prosecution would not be in the public interest. The police or the Crown Prosecution Service may be able to justify on technical grounds that this is the proper thing to do. But the wider interests should prevail and the sooner a decision is made to end plans to prosecute the better.” Don Foster, a veteran Lib Dem MP who advises the culture secretary, Jeremy Hunt, informally on media issues, called on the attorney general to block the “extremely bizarre” use of the act. “I understand the attorney general has the opportunity to use this power,” Foster said after a fringe meeting, organised by the Hacked Off campaign, that was addressed by the actor Hugh Grant. “He should use it and say this is not in the public interest.” Foster, who praised the Guardian for “fantastic journalism” in exposing phone hacking, found unanimous support at the fringe meeting when he asked whether the Guardian’s disclosure that Milly Dowler’s phone had been hacked – the revelation that prompted the police use of the Official Secrets Act – was justified. The MP said: “If it was in the public interest for the Guardian to do what they did it is extremely bizarre, it is almost unheard of, for the Metropolitan police to have used the Official Secrets Act as the basis for seeking to get hold of the information they want.” He added: “It is absolutely vital that we find out first of all who actually signed off agreement to use the Official Secrets Act and, secondly, we have to have a very, very clear explanation of why they are doing it. A final decision is made by the attorney general as to whether to allow it to happen. The one good bit of news is that, in making his decision, the attorney general can use public interest as one of the criteria that he considers. I hope he will very seriously indeed.” Tom Brake, chair of the Lib Dem home affairs committee, said: “The use of the Official Secrets Act in these circumstances is very unusual, and all the more worrying because it does not allow the defendant to argue that their actions were in the public interest. The Met need to explain why they think it is appropriate to use the Official Secrets Act in this case. While this is clearly a matter for the police and the attorney general, I do question whether this action is in the public interest given everything that has happened, or indeed in the interests of investigative journalism.” The political unease was echoed in police circles. One insider asked: “When was the last time the OSA [Official Secrets Act] was used successfully against the media?” The source added that the Met had to be seen to be rigorous, but threatening to get a production order requiring the handing over of notes and the revealing of sources was a step too far: “No one was expecting us to use the OSA. Usually the use of the OSA ends in tears.” With the new Met commissioner, Bernard Hogan-Howe, not due to start his job as Britain’s top police officer officially until later this month, the source added: “He is not even in office and he is facing his first crisis.” Hugh Grant said at the Hacked Off meeting: “A lot of us victims and campaigners had come to the view that the new police inquiry – [Operation] Weeting under Sue Akers – were good cops. It was a new investigation. They were embarrassed by the behaviour of their predecessors and colleagues. So for them to suddenly turn on their fellow goodies in this battle is worrying and deeply mysterious.” The Met said that the application for a production order was made under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act and did not seek to use powers under the Official Secrets Act. But the police said that the OSA was mentioned in the application because a possible offence under that act might have been committed. Press freedom Phone hacking The Guardian National newspapers Newspapers & magazines Newspapers Metropolitan police Police Dominic Grieve Liberal Democrats Nicholas Watt Vikram Dodd guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Pressure on attorney general to block Met move against press freedom

Dominic Grieve urged to stop police using Official Secrets Act to force Guardian to reveal sources in phone hacking case The attorney general, Dominic Grieve, is facing growing pressure to block an attempt by the Metropolitan police to use the Official Secrets Act to force journalists to reveal their sources. As senior Liberal Democrats indicated that Nick Clegg was “sympathetic” to journalists, police sources also expressed unease after Scotland Yard applied last week for an order under the 1989 act to require the Guardian to identify its sources on phone hacking. One police source said the decision to invoke the act was “likely to end in tears” for the Met. Lib Dem sources said that as deputy prime minister, Clegg was unable to express a view on what action the attorney general should take. But senior Lib Dems lined up at the party conference in Birmingham to call on the attorney general to use his powers to rule that the Yard’s use of the act is not in the public interest. Simon Hughes, the Lib Dem deputy leader, who is suing News International over alleged phone hacking at the News of the World, said: “Millions of people believe the Guardian has done a public service by exposing the series of scandals behind phone hacking carried out on a regular basis by individuals on behalf of other media organisations like the Murdoch empire. It is entirely inappropriate for the Officials Secret Act to be used to try to prosecute journalists who have taken these actions. “I hope that the law officers, or the government more widely, will make it clear that such an intervention and such a prosecution would not be in the public interest. The police or the Crown Prosecution Service may be able to justify on technical grounds that this is the proper thing to do. But the wider interests should prevail and the sooner a decision is made to end plans to prosecute the better.” Don Foster, a veteran Lib Dem MP who advises the culture secretary, Jeremy Hunt, informally on media issues, called on the attorney general to block the “extremely bizarre” use of the act. “I understand the attorney general has the opportunity to use this power,” Foster said after a fringe meeting, organised by the Hacked Off campaign, that was addressed by the actor Hugh Grant. “He should use it and say this is not in the public interest.” Foster, who praised the Guardian for “fantastic journalism” in exposing phone hacking, found unanimous support at the fringe meeting when he asked whether the Guardian’s disclosure that Milly Dowler’s phone had been hacked – the revelation that prompted the police use of the Official Secrets Act – was justified. The MP said: “If it was in the public interest for the Guardian to do what they did it is extremely bizarre, it is almost unheard of, for the Metropolitan police to have used the Official Secrets Act as the basis for seeking to get hold of the information they want.” He added: “It is absolutely vital that we find out first of all who actually signed off agreement to use the Official Secrets Act and, secondly, we have to have a very, very clear explanation of why they are doing it. A final decision is made by the attorney general as to whether to allow it to happen. The one good bit of news is that, in making his decision, the attorney general can use public interest as one of the criteria that he considers. I hope he will very seriously indeed.” Tom Brake, chair of the Lib Dem home affairs committee, said: “The use of the Official Secrets Act in these circumstances is very unusual, and all the more worrying because it does not allow the defendant to argue that their actions were in the public interest. The Met need to explain why they think it is appropriate to use the Official Secrets Act in this case. While this is clearly a matter for the police and the attorney general, I do question whether this action is in the public interest given everything that has happened, or indeed in the interests of investigative journalism.” The political unease was echoed in police circles. One insider asked: “When was the last time the OSA [Official Secrets Act] was used successfully against the media?” The source added that the Met had to be seen to be rigorous, but threatening to get a production order requiring the handing over of notes and the revealing of sources was a step too far: “No one was expecting us to use the OSA. Usually the use of the OSA ends in tears.” With the new Met commissioner, Bernard Hogan-Howe, not due to start his job as Britain’s top police officer officially until later this month, the source added: “He is not even in office and he is facing his first crisis.” Hugh Grant said at the Hacked Off meeting: “A lot of us victims and campaigners had come to the view that the new police inquiry – [Operation] Weeting under Sue Akers – were good cops. It was a new investigation. They were embarrassed by the behaviour of their predecessors and colleagues. So for them to suddenly turn on their fellow goodies in this battle is worrying and deeply mysterious.” The Met said that the application for a production order was made under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act and did not seek to use powers under the Official Secrets Act. But the police said that the OSA was mentioned in the application because a possible offence under that act might have been committed. Press freedom Phone hacking The Guardian National newspapers Newspapers & magazines Newspapers Metropolitan police Police Dominic Grieve Liberal Democrats Nicholas Watt Vikram Dodd guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Bill Clinton: Public-Private Cooperation Is A Way Out Of Jobs Crisis

video platform video management video solutions video player Former President Bill Clinton appears on This Week With Christiane Amanpour to talk about the upcoming Clinton Global Initiative and its focus on job creation . I was part of a group of bloggers that got to meet with him a few years ago, and he was talking about green retrofits then. As I recall, the energy savings numbers he said could be created by retrofits were jaw-dropping, so this makes more sense than ever: AMANPOUR: Now, sir, your mantra right now is jobs, jobs, jobs. What do you think can happen to radically shift the unemployment picture and also pass muster in Washington in these very partisan times? CLINTON: Well, I don’t know that I’m the best person to answer the second part of that question. But I believe that we, those of us who aren’t in government, can think of ways to create jobs which will reinforce what I believe are the positive suggestions coming out of Washington. Essentially, the president’s plan has big payroll tax cuts in it, which will benefit the economy by lowering the average family’s tax bill by 1,500 dollars. And then they can have that to spend. That will help. And then by lowering payroll taxes for employers, will make it more attractive for them to hire new people. But those of us who aren’t in government, we don’t have anything to do with that. So what we should do is focus on possible areas of job creation that will free up some of the corporate money that’s in Treasuries now, that could be invested in America, and make bank loans more attractive to create jobs. So that’s what we try to do. We try to go around thinking about ways to specifically to do that. And if you look at the way the CGI program is set up this year, we also are trying to create more jobs around the world by focusing on the possibilities of green energy elsewhere, because it’s not just in America that the green tech jobs are growing at twice the rate of overall employment. It’s — that’s true around the world. And by focusing on trying to empower women and girls, because in many other countries, they’re left out of the economy. And that’s dragging the economic prospects of everyone down. AMANPOUR: So what will tell the CEOs and the world leaders who come to your Clinton Global Initiative meeting this next week? CLINTON: Well, I will ask them to put aside for the moment whatever their recommendations are to Washington about changes in the corporate tax laws or the trade bills or, you know, the tariffs that are imposed on component parts that some manufacturers use here but have to import from overseas, and just think about where we are now and what we can do now with the resources we now have. For example, I think we’ll have an update on an announcement we made in Chicago, where the AFL-CIO and a couple of its affiliate unions are going to put some of their own pension funds into putting people to work retrofitting buildings and doing other things that will create jobs for their members and for other Americans in a way that will actually make more money for the pension funds than just putting it into the stock market will today. And they’ll be in partnership with business instead of having a Washington political fight with them. AMANPOUR: Where do you see — obviously, this is all about this stubborn unemployment rate. Where do you see the unemployment, after all of these suggestions, and if they’re implemented — where do you see it standing this time next year? CLINTON: Well, if you look at the program that the president has outlined, I think if we had the payroll tax cuts and the special incentives to hire the long term unemployed, and we did some of the things that I have been pushing very hard for, to invest building retrofits, which, if we did it right, could create a billions of jobs, the estimates are right across the economic board, including by Mr. Zandy who was an economic adviser to Senator McCain in the 2008 election. All of the estimates that it will create somewhere between 1.3 and two million jobs, and drop unemployment by approximately one percent, maybe a little more. That’s if they’re implemented. That’s — we can’t do much better than that right now, unless — unless there is an aggressive action, which seems unlikely in Washington’s political climate, to clean up this housing mess, because that’s freezing too much investment in place. So I think that it’s a very good program that he outlined. I think if the Congress seriously takes him up on it and they start trying to work through it and get anything approaching the amount of activity that was recommended, they could put about two percent more on the GDP growth of the coming year, and they could drop unemployment by somewhere between one to two million. Or they can create one to two million jobs. AMANPOUR: You have said in the past that this is not time for Mexican standoff or sort of macho politics. What can be done to make people in this city understand that the country faces a national emergency in this regard? CLINTON: Well, we need a little bit of help from the American people. I mean, conflict has proved to be remarkably good politics. And it — that sort of thing, you know, that — it’s very hard for the people in Washington, who got there based on pure conflict, pure attack, pure ideology, to take it seriously when their same constituents are saying please do something positive. That’s not how they got elected. We live in a time where there’s this huge disconnect between the way the political system works and the way the economic system works. If you look — there are places all over America, believe it or not, that have low unemployment, high growth, strong home prices, jobs being created, a shortage of skilled workers. And in every one of those places, they have networks of cooperation. San Diego has the largest number of Nobel Prized scientists in America. It’s become the biotech center of the country. Everybody knows Silicon Valley’s back. But look at what’s happening in Pittsburgh, where they’re trading steel for nanotechnology and other biomedical advances. Look at what’s happening in Cleveland, around the Cleveland Clinic. Look at what’s happening in Massachusetts, with the recovery of high-tech manufacturing around the MIT area. I can give you lots and lots of other examples. Every place the American economy is booming, cooperation is the order of the day. But conflict is still good politics in Washington. So until the American people make it clear that whatever — however they voted in past elections, they want these folks to work together and to do something, there’s going to be a little ambivalence in Washington. AMANPOUR: Let me ask you this, then: Mayor Bloomberg of New York has said this week that unless something is done to really address this unemployment problem, there could be riots in the street, unrest. Do you — do you agree with that? CLINTON: I don’t know. There have been demonstrations in many other countries where the same thing is going on. But if you — the most important thing Mayor Bloomberg said recently is to offer land on Governor’s Island or Roosevelt Island or the Navy Yard in Brooklyn for a new world-class science and technology research center. And he said that he’ll kick in $100 million worth of investment if a group of universities will put one there, because he wants New York, in effect, to rival Silicon Valley as a technology center. That’s the kind of thing that works. If you want put people to work, we’ve got to focus on what works, and what works is not all this back and forth fighting in Washington. I think, as I said, I think that if we can’t fix the housing crisis now — which is probably not politically possible, but should be done — we can’t return to full employment . But if we adopt the plan that the president outlined, according to all this economic analysis, it will create between 1.5, 2 percent increase in GDP growth. It will put a million or two million people to work, and we’ll be on the way back. We need some signal out of Washington that they understand that cooperation is good economics, even if conflict is good politics. AMANPOUR: Mr. President, obviously the current situation in various polls are suggesting that people aren’t satisfied with President Obama’s leadership on this. And there was a special election in New York in District 9 that the Democrats lost after holding it for nearly 100 years. What does that say to you? CLINTON: Well, the New York case is — I know that district very well, and they were good enough to vote for me twice. But, I think, Mayor Koch had a big impact on that election because of the controversy surrounding Israel and how they’re reacting to the proposal of the Palestinians to get the U.N. to recognize them as a state. I think that had a lot to do with it. I also think it’s a real blue-collar district that is suffering economically. So, it didn’t surprise me. And I don’t think — and the Nevada district was a Republican district. So it’s just — it is what it is. We won not very long ago that district in upstate New York that had been Republican for even longer than this district had been Democrat because of the Medicare plan, and the Republicans have stopped talking about their plan to voucherize Medicare. So I — there’s a lot of upheaval now. A lot of, you know, people are feeling disjointed because they’re hurting economically and they don’t see the country going forward.

Continue reading …
Cheney Denies He Was ‘Sowing Discord’ by Pushing for Obama Primary Challenge

Click here to view this media Former President Bill Clinton says that former Vice President Dick Cheney does not have the purest of motives in suggesting that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton mount a primary challenge against President Barack Obama. Cheney told ABC’s Jonathan Karl earlier this month that a Hillary Clinton 2012 presidential bid was “not a bad idea.” “Maybe if — the Obama record is bad enough — and these days it’s not very good, given the shape of the economy maybe there will be enough ferment — in the Democratic Party so that there will be a primary on their side,” he said. CBS’ Bob Schieffer gave President Clinton a chance Sunday “to endorse the vice president’s statement.” “You know, I’m very proud of her,” Clinton said of his wife. “So I’m always gratified whenever anyone says anything nice about her. I very much agree that she’s done a good job. But I also have a high regard for Vice President Cheney’s political skills. And I think one of those great skills is sowing discord among the opposition.” “I think that he’s right that she’s done a heck of a good job, but she is a member of this administration and committed to doing it. I think he, by saying something nice about her in the way he did it, knew that it might cause a little trouble. I don’t want to help him succeed in his political strategy, but I admire the fact that he’s still out there hitting the ball.” Moments later, Cheney denied he was just trying to “stir up trouble.” “No, I just thought, bob, that the Democrats ought to have as much fun on their side as we’re having on our side in figuring out who is going to run,” Cheney insisted. “So I made the suggestion. I’m glad to see that he thought there was some merit to the idea. He didn’t endorse it obviously but he had to think about it.”

Continue reading …
Cheney Denies He Was ‘Sowing Discord’ by Pushing for Obama Primary Challenge

Click here to view this media Former President Bill Clinton says that former Vice President Dick Cheney does not have the purest of motives in suggesting that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton mount a primary challenge against President Barack Obama. Cheney told ABC’s Jonathan Karl earlier this month that a Hillary Clinton 2012 presidential bid was “not a bad idea.” “Maybe if — the Obama record is bad enough — and these days it’s not very good, given the shape of the economy maybe there will be enough ferment — in the Democratic Party so that there will be a primary on their side,” he said. CBS’ Bob Schieffer gave President Clinton a chance Sunday “to endorse the vice president’s statement.” “You know, I’m very proud of her,” Clinton said of his wife. “So I’m always gratified whenever anyone says anything nice about her. I very much agree that she’s done a good job. But I also have a high regard for Vice President Cheney’s political skills. And I think one of those great skills is sowing discord among the opposition.” “I think that he’s right that she’s done a heck of a good job, but she is a member of this administration and committed to doing it. I think he, by saying something nice about her in the way he did it, knew that it might cause a little trouble. I don’t want to help him succeed in his political strategy, but I admire the fact that he’s still out there hitting the ball.” Moments later, Cheney denied he was just trying to “stir up trouble.” “No, I just thought, bob, that the Democrats ought to have as much fun on their side as we’re having on our side in figuring out who is going to run,” Cheney insisted. “So I made the suggestion. I’m glad to see that he thought there was some merit to the idea. He didn’t endorse it obviously but he had to think about it.”

Continue reading …
Gregory Contends ‘Awkward’ Moments at Debates ‘Challenge Notion’ GOP is ‘Party of Life’

Meet the Press host David Gregory contented the fact a Republican presidential debate audience applauded Texas Governor Rick Perry for allowing the death penalty for murders, and three in an audience of hundreds shouted “yeah” to the idea a man who decided to not buy health insurance may be allowed to die, are “really a challenge to the notion that the Republican Party is the party of life and supports a culture of life.” (video after jump) After he played a clip of the audience applauding when Brian Williams pressed Perry on how “your state has executed 234 death row inmates, more than any other Governor in modern times,” Gregory declared that “an awkward moment of applause” before demanding of his guest, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell: “Does the audience response in both cases trouble you as a Republican?” Of course, executing murders following a due process procedure in which the accused are judged by a jury means they are hardly innocent and does not contradict the quest to protect the innocent life of those yet born nor of those near the end of life who have lost their mental capacities. Only three cheered the proposition the government shouldn’t step in to help a man who failed to plan for his own care – so not really representative of conservatives and/or Republicans. Even in that case, however, the adult man is not in the same position of a fetus unable to make decisions about the priorities of where to spend their money. Earlier, with video: “ NBC Debate Moderators Pepper Republicans with Questions from the Left ” From the end of Gregory’s segment with McConnell on the Sunday, September 18 Meet the Press: DAVID GREGORY: I want to play a couple of moments from recent debates that had to do with really a challenge to the notion that the Republican Party is the party of life and supports a culture of life. The first question, from my colleague Brian Williams in the debate that had to do with the death penalty, to Rick Perry. I'll show you that. BRIAN WILLIAMS, AT SEPTEMBER 7 DEBATE: Your state has executed 234 death row inmates, more than any other Governor in modern times. Have you- [audience applause] GREGORY: An awkward moment of applause. And then during the CNN debate, Wolf Blitzer asked Ron Paul whether a healthy man who had opted not to get insurance should be allowed to live, frankly, if it required intensive care for a period of six months. Here was the question. WOLF BLITZER, SEPTEMBER 12 DEBATE: Congressman, are you saying that society should just let him die? RON PAUL: No. THREE AUDIENCE MEMBERS, SEPARATELY: Yeah. GREGORY: Does the audience response in both cases trouble you as a Republican? SENATOR MITCH McCONNELL: Look, we have a lot of people running for President. There are going to be a lot of debates, a lot of things said. A lot of audience reactions. I don't have any particular reaction to what's going on in Republican campaign for President right now. I've got a big job to do trying to help turn this country around. And working with a President who I believe has been doing all of the wrong things. I mean, if you look at the stimulus bill, David, what did we get out of that? Turtle tunnels and Solyndra. Solyndra. Look, more money was lost on Solyndra than came to my state to fix roads and bridges out of the entire stimulus package last year. And now he's asking us to do it again. One of my favorite sayings here in Kentucky, out in the rural areas, is there's no education the second kick of a mule. I mean, we've been there. We've done that. Now he's asking us to do it again. I'm trying to get him to go in a different direction. I've got my hands full without commenting on all that's going on in the Republican campaigns for President.

Continue reading …
Waiting for kick-off – plight of African footballers left on sidelines in Turkey

Dream of success in European leagues turns into nightmare of fake scouts and missed chances On a run-down football pitch in the central Istanbul neighbourhood of Ferikoy, about 50 African players come together in the middle of the pitch to sing hymns before their morning training session. On the sidelines, others warm up and do laps, wearing jerseys from Ghanaian, Nigerian and English Premier League teams. They have come to Turkey in the hope of securing a contract with a big local team or, even better, with one in Europe. Yet for many Turkey is no longer a stepping stone to a professional career, but a dead end. Some of the players training in Ferikoy were stars in their home countries, playing in national and first division teams, but have not played professional football since. A sleepy groundsman makes his way across the field, greeting some of the players with a high five. When he starts to collect money from the players, a friendly haggle starts: for many of them, the TL2.50 (90p) is a considerable sum. For Adaquart Manubah, football was an escape – literally: “It was a possibility to get away from the chaos and poverty of Liberia.” His father was a football player, and his 13 brothers all play football for a living. Between 1994 and 1998, Manubah played in the Liberian national team, until the civil war forced him to flee to Ghana. After an odyssey that took him to Nigeria, Malaysia, the Emirates, Bangladesh and India he ended up in Turkey. Now 32, he does not aspire to play in a Turkish team anymore. His dream, he says, is to become an official Fifa agent: “I know players and teams everywhere. I would love to connect talented players with teams all over the world.” But the licence is expensive. “I would need to deposit $500,000 (£316,000) for an official Fifa licence.” He laughs. “I am still saving up.” His favourite team? “Besiktas – they wear black and white. That’s a nice metaphor, isn’t it?” Edo, a Nigerian, came to Turkey more than five years ago. He flew in from Ivory Coast, where he played for a first division club for two seasons, before a Turkish Fifa agent struck a deal with his team’s manager: “He wanted two good players for teams in Turkey, a midfielder and a striker. This is how I got to be here.” But when Edo arrived in Istanbul after completing visa requirements, the Fifa agent was gone, and recruiting for Turkish clubs was over. “I arrived here in May, at the wrong time,” he says. The date of arrival is crucial: “If the transfer season is closed, there is nothing you can do.” It means being caught between a rock and a hard place: with visas only valid for up to one month, simply waiting for the new transfer window is impossible, while clubs usually drop initial invitations to move on to new recruiting lists for new seasons. Edo did not pay the agent to bring him to Turkey, but many families pay thousands of dollars to fake scouts who promise contracts with major teams – only to disappear when the players arrival in Istanbul: “It’s a form of human trafficking,” he says. “You arrive in a foreign country where you don’t know the language, you don’t know anyone. What are you supposed to do?” Many find help in the community of African migrants in Istanbul. Without residence and work permits, some work as translators for businessmen from African countries, others engage in small-scale trading, sending clothes or toiletries back home for their relatives to sell and send back the profits. However, most rely on their families back home: “Their relatives send money – this is how most people survive.” Matters get worse when entry visas expire. “Many players stay put, even without a valid visa,” says Edo. If detained by police, they risk arrest and sometimes deportation. “They don’t want to go back because they still have the hope that maybe some day, some time, something good will happen.” Many cannot afford the plane ticket home, and very few want to either bear the cost of another visa application in their home countries, or the risk of it being rejected. Honour, Edo says, also plays a big part in staying: “Their families, their friends and teammates back home all think they will go on to play in big clubs. They invested a lot. If they come back without having achieved anything, it would be a big shame.” Edo thinks most players never get a chance to prove their talent: “One out of 100 gets the chance of a contract and a club. Many never even get to play in try-outs.” According to him, the mentality of Turkish football managers has much to do with that: “Turkish teams look to take players that have played in European teams before, even very small teams. They look to names, not to talent.” European scouts are more open-minded, he says, but it is hard for African players to get a visa to Europe. “Most players’ standard here is way above the Amateur League,” Edo says. “Yet that is where most African footballers end up, if they get a contract at all.” Why do so many players leave their high-profile African teams to risk getting stuck in Turkey? “If you want to make a name for yourself in football, you need to play in Europe. And the facilities, the pay … is better there.” In many African countries, he says, even first division players struggle to make a living. Jackson Eyinga, a 24-year-old player from Cameroon, was lucky. With the help of his agent, former Cameroonian coach Joseph Ndong, he managed to secure a contract with Ferikoyspor, an Istanbul Amateur League team: one season at a salary of TL1,000 a month. Of the transfer fee – €1,500 (£1,300) – Ndong got 10%. In Cameroon, Eyinga played in the first division, and in the U20 national team. He arrived in Turkey a year ago, on the invitation of Kardemir Karabukspor, a first division club. However, due to the delay of his visa, Eyinga arrived only after the transfer season was closed. His visa ran out, but he decided to stay, and trained in Ferikoy with other African players, hoping to be discovered by another scout. After the African Cup of Nations, a friendly tournament that takes place every year on the Ferikoy pitch, the club decided to sign him up. The transfer is both blessing and curse: should Ferikoyspor rise to the professional third league, Eyinga would have to drop out. Ndong explains: “The third league does not allow any foreign players in the team, so African football players who secure themselves contracts in Turkish amateur teams are stuck there.” Eyinga has a friend who played with Fenerbahce, and hopes he can make it as well. “He has talent,” Ndong insists. “All we need is someone to discover it.” Turkey Africa Middle East Europe guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Waiting for kick-off – plight of African footballers left on sidelines in Turkey

Dream of success in European leagues turns into nightmare of fake scouts and missed chances On a run-down football pitch in the central Istanbul neighbourhood of Ferikoy, about 50 African players come together in the middle of the pitch to sing hymns before their morning training session. On the sidelines, others warm up and do laps, wearing jerseys from Ghanaian, Nigerian and English Premier League teams. They have come to Turkey in the hope of securing a contract with a big local team or, even better, with one in Europe. Yet for many Turkey is no longer a stepping stone to a professional career, but a dead end. Some of the players training in Ferikoy were stars in their home countries, playing in national and first division teams, but have not played professional football since. A sleepy groundsman makes his way across the field, greeting some of the players with a high five. When he starts to collect money from the players, a friendly haggle starts: for many of them, the TL2.50 (90p) is a considerable sum. For Adaquart Manubah, football was an escape – literally: “It was a possibility to get away from the chaos and poverty of Liberia.” His father was a football player, and his 13 brothers all play football for a living. Between 1994 and 1998, Manubah played in the Liberian national team, until the civil war forced him to flee to Ghana. After an odyssey that took him to Nigeria, Malaysia, the Emirates, Bangladesh and India he ended up in Turkey. Now 32, he does not aspire to play in a Turkish team anymore. His dream, he says, is to become an official Fifa agent: “I know players and teams everywhere. I would love to connect talented players with teams all over the world.” But the licence is expensive. “I would need to deposit $500,000 (£316,000) for an official Fifa licence.” He laughs. “I am still saving up.” His favourite team? “Besiktas – they wear black and white. That’s a nice metaphor, isn’t it?” Edo, a Nigerian, came to Turkey more than five years ago. He flew in from Ivory Coast, where he played for a first division club for two seasons, before a Turkish Fifa agent struck a deal with his team’s manager: “He wanted two good players for teams in Turkey, a midfielder and a striker. This is how I got to be here.” But when Edo arrived in Istanbul after completing visa requirements, the Fifa agent was gone, and recruiting for Turkish clubs was over. “I arrived here in May, at the wrong time,” he says. The date of arrival is crucial: “If the transfer season is closed, there is nothing you can do.” It means being caught between a rock and a hard place: with visas only valid for up to one month, simply waiting for the new transfer window is impossible, while clubs usually drop initial invitations to move on to new recruiting lists for new seasons. Edo did not pay the agent to bring him to Turkey, but many families pay thousands of dollars to fake scouts who promise contracts with major teams – only to disappear when the players arrival in Istanbul: “It’s a form of human trafficking,” he says. “You arrive in a foreign country where you don’t know the language, you don’t know anyone. What are you supposed to do?” Many find help in the community of African migrants in Istanbul. Without residence and work permits, some work as translators for businessmen from African countries, others engage in small-scale trading, sending clothes or toiletries back home for their relatives to sell and send back the profits. However, most rely on their families back home: “Their relatives send money – this is how most people survive.” Matters get worse when entry visas expire. “Many players stay put, even without a valid visa,” says Edo. If detained by police, they risk arrest and sometimes deportation. “They don’t want to go back because they still have the hope that maybe some day, some time, something good will happen.” Many cannot afford the plane ticket home, and very few want to either bear the cost of another visa application in their home countries, or the risk of it being rejected. Honour, Edo says, also plays a big part in staying: “Their families, their friends and teammates back home all think they will go on to play in big clubs. They invested a lot. If they come back without having achieved anything, it would be a big shame.” Edo thinks most players never get a chance to prove their talent: “One out of 100 gets the chance of a contract and a club. Many never even get to play in try-outs.” According to him, the mentality of Turkish football managers has much to do with that: “Turkish teams look to take players that have played in European teams before, even very small teams. They look to names, not to talent.” European scouts are more open-minded, he says, but it is hard for African players to get a visa to Europe. “Most players’ standard here is way above the Amateur League,” Edo says. “Yet that is where most African footballers end up, if they get a contract at all.” Why do so many players leave their high-profile African teams to risk getting stuck in Turkey? “If you want to make a name for yourself in football, you need to play in Europe. And the facilities, the pay … is better there.” In many African countries, he says, even first division players struggle to make a living. Jackson Eyinga, a 24-year-old player from Cameroon, was lucky. With the help of his agent, former Cameroonian coach Joseph Ndong, he managed to secure a contract with Ferikoyspor, an Istanbul Amateur League team: one season at a salary of TL1,000 a month. Of the transfer fee – €1,500 (£1,300) – Ndong got 10%. In Cameroon, Eyinga played in the first division, and in the U20 national team. He arrived in Turkey a year ago, on the invitation of Kardemir Karabukspor, a first division club. However, due to the delay of his visa, Eyinga arrived only after the transfer season was closed. His visa ran out, but he decided to stay, and trained in Ferikoy with other African players, hoping to be discovered by another scout. After the African Cup of Nations, a friendly tournament that takes place every year on the Ferikoy pitch, the club decided to sign him up. The transfer is both blessing and curse: should Ferikoyspor rise to the professional third league, Eyinga would have to drop out. Ndong explains: “The third league does not allow any foreign players in the team, so African football players who secure themselves contracts in Turkish amateur teams are stuck there.” Eyinga has a friend who played with Fenerbahce, and hopes he can make it as well. “He has talent,” Ndong insists. “All we need is someone to discover it.” Turkey Africa Middle East Europe guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Intruder stabbed to death during suspected burglary

Householder, 39, arrested following fatal incident at house in Stockport, Greater Manchester A man has been arrested on suspicion of murder after an alleged intruder was stabbed to death at a house in Stockport. The 39-year-old man detained by police is believed to be the householder at the home in Bramhall. Police found the alleged intruder, who was in his late 30s, with knife injuries when they were called to the house at 7.50pm on Saturday. He was given first aid by paramedics but died a short time later. A 33-year-old man who is believed to have fled the scene in a white Citroën van, was arrested on Sunday on suspicion of aggravated burglary. The two men reportedly forced their way into the house and threatened the householder before one of the assailants suffered fatal knife injuries. Floral tributes to the dead man – referred to as “Ray”, “Raymond” and “Uncle Raymondo”– from family and friends were placed at the scene. One read: “Love you son. Going to miss you more than anything.” Police said it was understood that two men had entered the house and threatened the occupant, who was alone. His wife and 12-year-old son returned home during the incident but were unharmed. The couple who live at the address were named locally as Vincent and Karen Cooke. Chief Superintendent Tim Forber, of Greater Manchester police, said: “Clearly this is a serious incident in which a man has lost his life and, at this time, we believe the dead man was one of two men who were attempting to carry out a burglary at the house.” A police cordon was in place around the premises. It is the third incident of its kind in Greater Manchester in recent months. In June, Peter Flanagan, 59, fatally stabbed an intruder at his home in Salford after he was confronted by masked men wielding machetes. A month later, florist Cecil Coley, 72, stabbed a burglar at his shop in Old Trafford. Both men were arrested on suspicion of murder but were later released without charge as the Crown Prosecution Service ruled they acted in reasonable self-defence. Crime Manchester Caroline Davies guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …