The fraudulent foreclosure mess is a nightmare for Americans and it’s going to cause another major meltdown because of the corruption that is rooted in the actual foreclosure process. Ellinorianne has a great post up at DKOS called: Foreclosure Fiasco – What to Do for the Homeowners? HELP THEM! She outlines the problems and abuses and then offers some assistance. People need legal help to keep their homes. And many of those people don’t have the means to pay for that help. But there are resources but they need funding. I started here: Institute for Foreclosure Legal Assistance . The crisis of fraud has grown so large that we have a new kind of legal assistance focussed on just helping people keep their homes. IFLA Mission Statement and Goals As the nation’s foreclosure epidemic continues to worsen, the Center for Responsible Lending has formed the Institute for Foreclosure Legal Assistance (IFLA) to support groups giving legal representation to families facing foreclosure and financial ruin because of abusive subprime mortgages. The National Association of Consumer Advocates will manage the project, which recognizes that one of the biggest barriers families face to avoid losing their homes is the lack of access to quality legal services. The Institute, launched with a $15 million grant from investment management firm Paulson & Co. Inc., will provide funding and training to organizations that help homeowners negotiate alternatives to foreclosure. The majority of the funds will be grants to support direct legal assistance to borrowers in 10 or more states to fight foreclosure, predatory lenders and abusive loan servicers. It will do this primarily by providing money to top non-profit legal-aid groups and law school clinics. The IFLA then lists the many Legal Aid Foundations in various states. They need money to hire more lawyers so they can help people keep their homes. That’s it. Donate to your local Legal Aid Foundation and if you have the legal ability to help, please do. If you know the law, get training to help people keep their homes. As progressives we have a responsibility to help people stay in their homes, we can help them do so. So I’m asking you to help. This is a worthy cause. Please help if you can because who will?
Continue reading …Earlier this week the California Secretary of State gave the green light to Republican Michael Erickson to begin gathering signatures for his version of the Arizona immigration law that targets ethnic groups for heightened scrutiny by law enforcement officers. Erickson is the former head of the California Republican Party, current chairman of Republicans for the National Interest and the Support Federal Immigration Law Committee (full bio here ). He also appears to be a xenophobic Tea Party bigot cast in the mold of Jan Brewer, Russell Pearce and Kris Kobach. From the press release : “ Californians are under attack from a growing wave of drug related, gang violence. Now that Arizona courageously has resolved to crack down on the drug cartels in their state, we may presume that the murderous warlords will seek a safe haven in our state ,” continued Erickson. “Frankly, under the circumstances, we no longer have the time for the phony political posturing and fence sitting that substitutes for real leadership on this issue.” Noting that illegal immigration costs the state of California “tens of billions annually in education, health care, and incarceration,” Erickson scolded politicians as not being serious about solving our fiscal crisis when they “refuse to provide anything other than safe, poll driven clichés on this issue.” It’s so easy to make claims like this without substantiation. In fact, California’s crime rate has been steadily decreasing , with 2009 seeing a 6.6% drop in violent crime over 2008. That drop isn’t an anomaly either. Crime rates in California have been decreasing since 1992 at a steady rate, even as California’s population has increased. In order to get this initiative on the ballot, Erickson will need to gather about 434,000 signatures between now and 2012. He will surely employ the usual professional petition-gatherers, mobilize Tea Party supporters, and rely on conservative strongholds like Orange and Riverside counties to gain traction. As usual, the initiative and surrounding PR campaign have been crafted with some lip service to the exploitation of immigrant workers in order to fool people into signing the petition. Here’s an overview : Initiative supporters must gather at least 433,971 signatures of registered voters by April 21, 2011, to qualify for an election. Erickson said he’d aim to put the measure before voters during the 2012 election cycle. The effort will rely largely on volunteers from California’s Tea Party network, Erickson said. The California proposal would make it a state crime for undocumented persons to seek work while hiding their immigration status, and a state crime for employers to “intentionally or negligently” hire an illegal immigrant. The measure would also require all highway patrol, police, sheriff’s deputies and other officers to investigate a person’s immigration status if they are “reasonably suspicious” that a person who they stopped is in the country illegally. The difference with Arizona’s law, Erickson said, is that officers would have to contact federal immigration authorities and conduct such a check within a “timely manner” and could not hold a person for a long period of time. Just like the Arizona law, it targets people of color and Latinos in particular, because after all, who would “reasonably suspect” a white person with a Canadian or Australian accent from being here illegally. Right? There are two ways this can go, assuming he’s able to gather the required signatures. If it lands on the 2012 June primary ballot, Erickson and his group are counting on a similar turnout to the 2010 midterms, giving it a greater chance of passage. If it lands on the 2012 general election ballot, chances will diminish for passage because of the higher turnout and more engaged electorate. I think he underestimates the clout of the Latino vote in California. Let’s hope it never makes it to the ballot, but if it does, I predict a solid rejection at the polls..
Continue reading …A painful period he'd rather forget? Asked to name the person who preceded Meredith Vieira as his Today sidekick, Matt Lauer declined to mention Katie Couric, claiming “there was no one ever.
Continue reading …Happy Turkey Day, campers! Here were yesterday’s big economic stories: Ireland continues down its insane path to economic doom by unveiling its newest and bestest budget plan yet: The key announcements include: * Corporation tax rate unchanged at 12.5%. * 10bn euros (£2.5bn) of spending cuts between 2011-2014, and 5bn euros in tax rises. * Minimum wage to be cut by one euro to 7.65 euros per hour. * 3bn euros of cuts in public investment by 2014. * 2.8bn euros of welfare cuts by 2014, returning spending to 2007 levels. * Reduction of public sector pay bill by 1.2bn euros by 2014. * Reform public sector pensions for new entrants and cut their pay by 10%. * 24,750 cut in public sector jobs, back to 2005 level. * VAT up from 21% to 22% in 2013, then 23% in 2014. * Raise an extra 1.9bn euros from income tax. This is quite a laundry list of awesome. Raise the VAT and the income tax, cut the minimum wage, cut welfare. But wait! We haven’t even got to the best part — their GDP growth projections: Real GDP to grow by an average of 2.75% from 2011 to 2014. The ” O RLY ?” Owl just had a heart attack after laughing his feathers silly. Cutting services, cutting minimum wage and raising taxes to pay for the services that aren’t being cut… where the hell is the aggregate demand going to come from, guys?! And it’s not like this loan you’re receiving from the IMF is going to pay for anything useful — rather, it’s going into the black hole of what used to be your banking system. And this is even before we get to the negative externalities created by persistent rioting and looting that will surely follow these measures! Amazingly, the Irish are relieved — yes, relieved — that the IMF is coming to set things “right”: On the streets of Dublin, anger over the foreign paternalism appears to be limited. Passers-by in the city’s main shopping streets seem relieved that someone is finally keeping a close eye on the conservative-Green coalition government. “I am very pleased that the IMF is here,” said dentist Margaret Shannon.”The government is incompetent and corrupt.” “The people are delighted that experts are now in charge,” said Brian Lucey, a finance professor at Dublin’s presitigious Trinity College. Indeed, there are few signs of major protest in the Irish capital. A lone poster from the Socialist Party hangs on a lantern post in front of parliament, inviting people to an “public meeting” to oppose any drastic remedy the IMF might propose. But the people’s anger is largely directed at Prime Minister Cowen’s government, which is to present its four-year plan on Wednesday afternoon. The conservative politician has frittered away any remaining trust. After his party’s junior coalition partner, the Greens withdrew their support for Cowen on Monday, the prime minister was forced to announce that new elections would be held in the beginning of 2011. Now it appears to be just a matter of time before he steps down. Well they do have every right to be angry at their government, just as Americans have every right to be angry at our government (both the Bushies and our current regime). But dudes, the IMF is not like Santa Claus — when it comes to town, it ain’t bringing toys for all the little girls and boys. ICAP’s Nic Lenoir sensibly sees that this arrangement is untenable and it won’t prevent the bond vigilantes from swarming around Portugal, Spain and Italy next. He lays out the European Central Bank’s options: I/ Bail-out countries individually as has been the case so far: the market rejected Ireland’s bail-out so it is extremely unlikely as failure is quite obvious and Germany is opposed to it II/ Outright monetization by the ECB: so far intervention has been sterilized which has not proven too helpful. Germany is again highly opposed to this type of resolution. III/ Create a mechanism that involves the private sector and the EFSF: Germany has been pushing for this solution from day one but obviously no solution has been found, and if you start restructuring Irish debt you run the risk of a flight out of other PIIGS’s bonds IV/ Let the PIIGS out of the Euro, or the PIIGS show themselves out / the Euro is disbanded He’s placing his bets on outcome #4: The end of the Euro. The bailouts of Eurozone countries are coming to an end one way or the other, since Spain will be the straw that breaks the camel’s back : The cost of providing an Irish-style bailout for Spain would almost empty the emergency fund that was set up by the European Union and the International Monetary Fund to deal with the crisis affecting weak members of monetary union, a leading team of analysts warned tonight. Amid growing fears that pressure on Portugal will be followed by financial trouble for its Iberian neighbour, Capital Economics said the price tag for a rescue providing the equivalent funding security offered to Greece and Ireland would be a “whopping €420bn” (£356bn). Jennifer McKeown, Capital’s senior European economist, said there was a total of €660bn available from the EU and the IMF, of which Ireland was due to get €80-90bn. “If we knock off the similar amount that might be required to meet Portugal’s needs, we are left with just €490bn. That suggests that Spain’s needs could barely be met by current arrangements.” McKeown said the risk of a Spanish bailout was still fairly low, even though the country’s borrowing costs rose yesterday to their highest level since the creation of the single currency more than a decade ago. But should Spain require help, the cost would be “devastatingly high”. Wheeeeeeeeeee! Home sales are still in the crapper : Don’t look to the new home market for glad economic tidings: Home builders had another dismal sales month in October, falling to just one-fifth of the sales rate during the boom five years ago. New home sales dropped to an annual pace of just 283,000, according to the Commerce Department. That was down 8.1% from a slow September and 28.5% from 12 months ago when the annualized sales rate was at 430,000. Housing experts from Briefing.com had forecast a sales pace of 314,000. Gee, I wonder why people are reluctant to buy homes? Oh right, that whole forging key foreclosure documents thingee. How could I forget that? It will surprise you to learn that Glenn Beck has no idea what he’s talking about with regards to inflation : And inflation isn’t even computed like it used to be computed. The government figured it out. The government realized that people could recognize how bad things actually were, so they changed how we calculated it. So, in other words, the TV could say, “There’s no inflation,” and you’d be going, “I’m broke. How’s that happening?” Now, they calculate inflation without adding in the price of food and energy. Oh, well, other than those going up, we’re set. It’s true that the core Consumer Price Index does not contain food and energy prices. However, that doesn’t mean the Bureau of Labor Statistics doesn’t keep track of those prices. In fact, it does! If you compare core CPI to CPI with food and energy prices incorporated, you get a graph like thees one: enlarge So when your Beck-loving uncle starts ranting about Zimbabwe and the Weimar Republic at Thanksgiving today, kindly point him to this graph. Now for some happy news: It looks like the FBI’s insider trading probe has snagged its first fly : Federal law enforcement officials arrested an employee of an “expert-networking” firm Wednesday for allegedly conspiring to provide inside information to hedge funds. Don Chin Trang Chu, known as Don Chu, has been charged with arranging for insiders at publicly traded companies to provide nonpublic information to the firm’s hedge fund clients under the guise of a consulting service, according to a federal complaint unsealed in a Manhattan court. I’m no expert on this, but it seems like what’s being alleged is that Mr. Chu and his compatriots are in the business of bribing former company execs for insider secrets and then selling those secrets to hedge funds. I’m sure that the firms involved will claim that they provide an invaluable service by keeping our largest financial institutions solvent by giving them a head’s up on important blah, blah, blah, etc. Anyway, this is definitely something to monitor. More sorta happy news: Jobless claims were down to a two-month low last month. And finally, Yves Smith has a depressing-but-likely-accurate description of why the government will fail to hold anyone at all accountable for the massive fraud going on in the housing market. This one sentence about sums it up for me: The regulators appear not know what they are doing. This seems to be a running theme in American government. In fact, I’m beginning to think that my libertarian “gold standard today, gold standard 4-eva!” friends just might be onto something. And with that, have a great Thanksgiving peeps!
Continue reading …By E.J. Dionne, Jr. Happy Thanksgiving. That is not a political sentiment. Yet this year, everything seems partisan and even this most unifying of national holidays has become an occasion for ideological warfare. Related Entries November 24, 2010 Cultural Rebirth in the Old World November 24, 2010 Until We Meet Again: Giving Thanks to the American Cowboy
Continue reading …Berman pulls no punches in laying bare the truths about who we are, not just as a nation, but also as individuals wrapped up in the destructive pursuit of material excess. In the unswerving style of his other writings, he rips apart the national illusion of greatness. Related Entries November 24, 2010 Cultural Rebirth in the Old World November 24, 2010 More News, Less Turkey
Continue reading …enlarge Credit: Life Magazine Sixty Years ago this month when you mentioned Korea, it looked like this. Click here to view this media With news on the latest flare up in North/South Korean hostilities , I was reminded of an anniversary of sorts and our involvement in Korea in November of 1950 and how, around this time, it wasn’t going terribly well for the United Nations troops as indicated in this broadcast of Voice and Events from the first week of December 1950. President Truman: “Gentlemen, I have a statement to make; recent developments in Korea confront the world with a serious crisis. The battlefield situation is uncertain at this time. We may suffer reverses as we have suffered them before. But the forces of the United Nations have no intention of abandoning their mission in Korea. The forces of the United Nations are in Korea to put down an aggression that threatens not only the whole fabric of the United Nations, but all human hopes of peace and justice. If the United Nations yields to the forces of aggression, no nation will be safe or secure. If aggression is successful in Korea, we can expect it to spread throughout Asia and Europe and this hemisphere. We are fighting in Korea for our own national security and survival.” Not that we’re necessarily going to get involved in another “police action”, but just a reminder that we have a history in the region and it goes back quite a way.
Continue reading …It seems that whenever you hear about a “rightwing” hate crime nowadays, it turns out the the perpetrator turns out to be a leftwinger…much to the disappointment of liberals who continue to maintain the fiction about a violent Tea Party movement. And the latest case of a violent “rightwinger” who turns out to really be a leftwinger comes from my own county of Broward here in South Florida. With my condolences to the left who have been “robbed” of yet another example of supposed Tea Party “hate crime,” here is a report on the arrest of the suspect by Bob Norman of the Broward Palm Beach New Times: The woman charged by the FBI with making a threat that led to the lockdown of more than 300 Broward County schools after hearing
Continue reading …I’ve not been in favor of the idea of the US government selling M1 Abrams tanks and F16 aircraft to the the Iraqi army. It’s not just that their past experience has been limited to Soviet-era equipment (cheap, not state-of-the-art, but it works), but also because I just never thought they could sustain the capability. I think I was largely right, based on Walter Pincus’s article in the WaPo . Although the Interior Ministry has “matured” in its budgeting processes, it “could not effectively plan and contract to procure repair parts to support the Iraqi police vehicle fleet.” For example, when the Interior Ministry requested the purchase of a $200 million helicopter fleet, it did not provide for spare parts, maintenance support or required infrastructure facilities. With about $10 billion in military equipment on hand by end of 2011, Iraq would need about $600 million annually to maintain it, according to the defense IG. In 2010, however, the Iraq Defense Ministry allocated only $40 million for maintenance. Its processes for “identifying requirements, budgeting and executing contracting were broken,” the report concluded. Take the Iraqi army’s system for allocating fuel to its commands. The division commanders do not send their broken vehicles for repair, nor do they report those that are destroyed, because fuel is supplied based on the quantity and types of vehicles on their books. A local commander told the IG investigators that “it was more advantageous to keep unserviceable vehicles in order to continue receiving full fuel allocations and have enough fuel to operate the rest of his fleet.” It was always a mistake to think we could turn the Iraqis into a mini-US military element. It would be a bigger mistake to force US military weapon systems onto the Afghan military, but the Repubs have always thought of enriching their donors before actual national security interests.
Continue reading …Click here to view this media The Nation’s Jeremy Scahill sat down with his colleague Chris Hayes who was filling in for Rachel Maddow to discuss the latest farce concerning our occupation in Afghanistan and the lack of intelligence on the ground there. Scahill recently spent a great deal of time actually doing some reporting on the ground in Afghanistan and you can read more about that here — Taliban Leader Mullah Omar: The US and NATO Are Being Defeated in Afghanistan : In a communiqué marking the beginning of the Muslim holiday Eid-al-Adha, the leader of the Afghan Taliban, Mullah Mohammed Omar, claimed his forces were making gains against US and NATO forces in Afghanistan and announced a new plan to increase attacks aimed at delivering a “crushing and decisive blow” against the presence of foreign forces. “The aim is to entangle the enemy in an exhausting war of attrition and wear it away like the former Soviet Union,” declared Omar in his address on the “Festival of Sacrifice.” Omar wrote that his forces had developed new short- and long-term strategies, saying that, overall, “our strategy is to increase our operations step by step and spread them to all parts of the country to compel the enemy to come out from their hideouts and then crush them through tactical raids.” Current Taliban commanders and former senior officials of Omar’s Taliban government recently told The Nation that while the US Special Operations Forces’ targeted killing campaign against Taliban commanders has been successful, the strikes were actually producing a more radical generation of fighters and commanders. In his communication, Omar did not address the issue of the targeted killing campaign, but he did claim that morale among the Taliban remained high. “Our Mujahid people will never feel exhausted in the sacred path of Jihad, because it is a divine obligation,” he wrote. “Fatigue can have no way into it.” Go read the rest and Scahill summed up some of his reporting during his interview here with Hayes. Hayes: If we’re not going to win this war on the ground fighting it. If it’s not fundamentally going to be a military victory, which I think it increasingly looks like it cannot be… Scahill: Right. Hayes: …then the only other option right is some sort of diplomatic end and when I read this news the reason that it sort of upset me is I thought well, when they were meeting with Taliban leaders in the reports, I thought that maybe it actually is the beginning of something that can look like diplomacy. Do you still think diplomacy if feasible? Is it the only way out? Scahill: Well look, anyone that knows anything about Afghanistan will say there’s not going to be a military solution. The Taliban actually have a large constituency. They don’t operate in a vacuum. So in order to have a political solution, you have to negotiate with the Taliban. The problem is that the Taliban people are saying we won’t negotiate with Karzai until the US and NATO leave. The US is saying we’re not going to bow down to the demands of the Taliban, so either one of those sides backs down or we’re going to have a continued situation where there’s bloodshed. The worst case scenario could be that the US creates a more radical generation of Taliban, leaves the country having fueled a civil war and Afghanistan lives in war for perpetuity and I think that the bottom line here is that we have our Special Operations forces, the most elite, highly trained forces in the world essentially killing farmers and mid-level commanders. Those guys Chris, I talked to former Special Forces guys… guy today, they don’t want to be there any more. They see it as just an un-winnable war and they want to move on to Yemen and Somalia. Jeremy Scahill followed up by talking about the sheer amount of suffering and poverty that is going on with the Afgan population right now who are caught between all of these opposing forces. I know a lot of people on the left felt like our invasion of Afghanistan was somehow justified after the attacks on 9-11, but I’ve never been one of them. I wasn’t blogging back then, but at the time never understood the twisted logic that somehow dropping bombs on civilians’ heads and invading and occupying another country was somehow going to be a solution to stopping terrorism, rather than just eventually causing more of it. It’s always astounded me that people in the United States can’t seem to put themselves into another person’s shoes and try to imagine how they’d feel if it was another country that decided to treat us the same way we treat them and what we’d be willing to tolerate if the situation was reversed. Sadly as long as our political class is happy to help those make money off of other people’s suffering, we’re not going to change our policies where you make ending poverty a priority instead of dropping bombs on poor people’s heads as a means to ending terrorism.
Continue reading …