And so the Conservative assault on Elizabeth Warren begins. Limbaugh: You know who the real parasite here is. It’s Elizabeth Warren. I’m familiar with being called a parasite by the likes of Glenn Beck. I wear as badge of honor. Beck: Most Democrats still love America, they love the founders and they love the Constitution and believe in this country. But then there’s another group and they have infiltrated not just the Democratic party, but the Republican party… Speak softly and carry a big stick. blah, blah, blah…We got this from an insider. Wait until you hear this story. The co-chair of the CPC… How many times have I said they are like a virus feeding on the host of republic. The progressives are parasites inside the democrat…. The California progressives weren’t the only ones upset. John Amato of CrooksandLiars wrote on Huffington Post. “for Woolsey to holding a fundraising events for a known Blue Dog should be a firing offense for the CPC.” Progressives Democrats for America joined in, They started an online petition asking her to withdraw from the event. Woolsey said no. I don’t know how this story ends quite frankly it’s California and it’s all going to end in a mudslide right into the bottom of the ocean eventually anyway, but let me tell you something. The last time the progressives were in this position and they started gobbling power and they exposed themselves people caught on and hated them. It’s still an odious thing to say about somebody. And that type of language speaks to the “eliminationist” rhetoric and ideas that conservatives use to attack progressives all the time. They don’t want to defeat us, they want us wiped off the map. Deleted from existence with no room for cache recovery. Glenn Beck hopes California will be lost in a mudslide and all its people will be extinguished with it. Rush goes on to worry about Warren’s pension benefits. How much money does Rush make a year for calling Liberals “parasites ?” Rush Limbaugh just agreed to an eight-year, $400-million-plus extension with Clear Channel to stay on the air. Limbaugh’s deal includes an upfront $100-million signing bonus, which means the annualized average salary will be somewhere in the neighbourhood of $37 million through to 2016. Limbaugh: She’s a parasite who hates her host. Willing to destroy the host while she sucks the life out of it. Anyway, the attacks have begun. T he Politico and Mark Halperin have also entered the fray. You can donate to our Blue America Senate page where E. Warren is listed along with Bernie because the right wing will do anything to stop her.
Continue reading …And so the Conservative assault on Elizabeth Warren begins. Limbaugh: You know who the real parasite here is. It’s Elizabeth Warren. I’m familiar with being called a parasite by the likes of Glenn Beck. I wear as badge of honor. Beck: Most Democrats still love America, they love the founders and they love the Constitution and believe in this country. But then there’s another group and they have infiltrated not just the Democratic party, but the Republican party… Speak softly and carry a big stick. blah, blah, blah…We got this from an insider. Wait until you hear this story. The co-chair of the CPC… How many times have I said they are like a virus feeding on the host of republic. The progressives are parasites inside the democrat…. The California progressives weren’t the only ones upset. John Amato of CrooksandLiars wrote on Huffington Post. “for Woolsey to holding a fundraising events for a known Blue Dog should be a firing offense for the CPC.” Progressives Democrats for America joined in, They started an online petition asking her to withdraw from the event. Woolsey said no. I don’t know how this story ends quite frankly it’s California and it’s all going to end in a mudslide right into the bottom of the ocean eventually anyway, but let me tell you something. The last time the progressives were in this position and they started gobbling power and they exposed themselves people caught on and hated them. It’s still an odious thing to say about somebody. And that type of language speaks to the “eliminationist” rhetoric and ideas that conservatives use to attack progressives all the time. They don’t want to defeat us, they want us wiped off the map. Deleted from existence with no room for cache recovery. Glenn Beck hopes California will be lost in a mudslide and all its people will be extinguished with it. Rush goes on to worry about Warren’s pension benefits. How much money does Rush make a year for calling Liberals “parasites ?” Rush Limbaugh just agreed to an eight-year, $400-million-plus extension with Clear Channel to stay on the air. Limbaugh’s deal includes an upfront $100-million signing bonus, which means the annualized average salary will be somewhere in the neighbourhood of $37 million through to 2016. Limbaugh: She’s a parasite who hates her host. Willing to destroy the host while she sucks the life out of it. Anyway, the attacks have begun. T he Politico and Mark Halperin have also entered the fray. You can donate to our Blue America Senate page where E. Warren is listed along with Bernie because the right wing will do anything to stop her.
Continue reading …Chris Matthews is bracing for a potential Obama defeat next November, and he's ready to lay the blame for an Obama loss on racist white voters who supposedly hold black politicians to a higher standard than white politicians. In a segment this afternoon with Michael Eric Dyson and James Peterson , the “Hardball” host laid out his theory that “some white voters” will often give a black politician just one term in office but refuse to vote for their reelection unless they do “really, really good” in office. [Video and transcript follow below, emphasis mine; MP3 audio here ] CHRIS MATTHEWS: Professor Peterson, let me ask you about white votes. Do you have a sense as you've looked at politics in America that there are some white voters who will vote for an African-American say once? And they will hold that person to a very rigorous standard. Perhaps a much higher standard than they would a white politician. And they'll give them one shot and then they'll dump them the next time. I look at this, I look at the Ed Brooke. I look at the senator from Illinois. I think about this– MICHAEL ERIC DYSON: Carol Moseley Braun MATTHEWS: Yeah, Carol Moseley Braun. I wonder if this is a phenomenon you professors have looked at analytically at all, this sense of, okay, you've got your shot, but let's see you do it, if it isn't really, really good, you know, you're out of there.
Continue reading …Cameron speech says failure of eurozone leaders to stabilise single currency is taking world economy to brink The global economy is close to “staring down the barrel” and is threatened by the failure of eurozone leaders to agree a lasting settlement to stabilise the single currency, David Cameron warned on Thursday night. As markets tumbled around the world, amid gloomy assessments from the IMF and the World Bank, the prime minister issued his gravest warning about the global economic outlook and bluntly told eurozone leaders to stop “kicking the can down the road”. “We are not quite staring down the barrel but the pattern is clear,” the prime minister told the Canadian parliament in Ottawa. “The recovery out of the recession for the advanced economies will be difficult. Growth in Europe has stalled, growth in America has stalled. The effect of the Japanese earthquake, high oil and fuel prices is creating a drag on growth. But fundamentally we are still facing the aftermath of the world financial bust and economic collapse in 2008.” Cameron’s speech came as Christine Lagarde, the managing director of the International Monetary Fund, warned world leaders that “time is of the essence” as investors took fright at politicians’ failure to tackle sickly global growth and the spiralling eurozone debt crisis. As Cameron spoke, the FTSE 100 index tumbled 246 points, or 4.67%, to close at 5041 – the blue-chip index’s worst daily fall in percentage terms since March 2009. On Wall Street, the Dow Jones index closed 3.5% down at 10773 points, while share prices in France and Germany also dropped sharply. The prime minister identified one of the main problems as the failure of eurozone leaders to agree a “lasting solution” to stabilise the single currency. “The problems in the eurozone are now so big that they have begun to threaten the stability of the world economy,” Cameron said. “Eurozone countries must act swiftly to resolve the crisis. They must implement what they have agreed and they must demonstrate they have the political will to do what is necessary to ensure the stability of the system. One way or another, they have to find a fundamental and lasting solution to the heart of the problem – the high level of indebtedness in many euro countries.” In an interview with Channel 4 News, the prime minister used blunter language to call for eurozone leaders to offer stronger political backing for the €440bn (£386bn) bailout mechanism, known as the European Financial Stability Facility. In a message to the 17 eurozone leaders, he said: “We cannot go on kicking the can down the road. We need decisive action, swift action to deal with this issue.” The prime minister showed how Britain is beginning to distance itself from its EU partners by signing a letter with five other world leaders outside Europe calling on eurozone leaders to “act swiftly”. The letter to the French president, Nicolas Sarkozy, in his capacity as president of the G20, says: “We have not yet mastered the challenges of the crisis.” The letter, designed to help shape the agenda at the next G20 meeting in Cannes in November, is likely to be seen as a major departure in British diplomacy, which has been anchored in the EU for the past four decades. It is unprecedented for a British prime minister to join forces with two other Commonwealth leaders – Canada’s Stephen Harper and Australia’s Julia Gillard – and three other leaders from outside the EU to issue a warning to the main EU member states. The prime minister’s language shows Britain’s deep frustration with the failure of eurozone leaders to grapple with the crisis in the single currency. Cameron wants action in two areas: greater political will behind the eurozone bailout mechanism, and moves towards greater fiscal integration in the eurozone, though not in the rest of the EU, in the medium to long term. “The remorseless logic of economic and monetary union is fiscal integration,” a British source said. In his Ottawa speech the prime minister also echoed the IMF’s calls for Europe’s banks to be strengthened and added that euro countries should reform their labour markets. “Whatever course they take, Europe’s banks need to be made strong enough so that they can help support the recovery, not put it at risk,” Cameron said. “At the same time, we cannot put off the fundamental problem of the lack of competitiveness in many euro-area countries. “Endlessly putting off what has to be done doesn’t help, in fact it makes the problem worse, lengthening the shadow of uncertainty that looms over the world economy.” The letter to Sarkozy was initially interpreted as a warning to Barack Obama, who recently outlined a $440bn (£287bn) jobs package for the US. British officials rejected this interpretation because the Obama plan is fiscally neutral and because the letter was carefully balanced. The latest sell-off in the world’s financial markets came after a key manufacturing survey in China suggested its economy is faltering, and the Federal Reserve’s latest emergency measure, Operation Twist, failed to calm markets. G20 finance ministers will discuss the darkening economic outlook on Friday in Washington on the fringes of the IMF’s annual meeting. Lagarde told reporters in Washington that “our actions, our analysis and our proposed policy mix is not dictated by the day-to-day variations of the Dow Jones, the Nasdaq, the Cac or the Dax”. But she called on Europe and the US to rediscover the spirit of the London G20 conference at the depths of the financial crisis in 2009, when leaders promised to boost the IMF’s resources, bail out banks and avoid tit-for-tat protectionism. Lagarde said the priority must be “implementation, implementation, implementation”, but she conceded that politicians now had less scope for action than three years ago in the wake of the collapse of Lehman Brothers. “In 2008, there was a much wider path for recovery, because the sovereigns had more room for manoeuvre. They incredibly ably managed to avoid protectionism, to kick-start growth, and to make sure than the financial pipes that fuel the economy worked again.” In Greece the government announced a fresh round of austerity measures on Tuesday, including pension cuts and tax rises for low earners, in an attempt to persuade its creditors, including the IMF, to release the latest €8bn tranche of rescue funds. But many investors now believe default for the debt-burdened state is inevitable. The Federal Reserve chairman, Ben Bernanke, had hoped to soothe investors’ fears on Wednesday by announcing Operation Twist, aimed at driving down long-term interest rates and boosting the ailing American housing market. But share prices around the world plunged after the announcement as investors became fixated instead on the Fed’s warning that the economy faced “significant downside risks”. Global recession Euro Recession Economics European Union Euro David Cameron Nicolas Sarkozy Europe Currencies Global economy Nicholas Watt Heather Stewart guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Judges suspect kickbacks used for illegal party funds as president’s friends caught up in the ‘Karachi affair’ Nicolas Sarkozy’s battle for re-election has been overshadowed by a major corruption scandal after two of his closest friends were charged by judges investigating alleged kickbacks on arms sales to Pakistan. The investigation, known as the “Karachi affair”, is the biggest French corruption scandal since the second world war, Sarkozy’s political opponents said. It is a potentially murderous saga of alleged illegal party funding, suitcases stuffed with banknotes, rightwing political rivalry and, ultimately, the deaths of 15 people in a bomb attack in Pakistan. Nicolas Bazire, one of Sarkozy’s closest friends and best man at his wedding to Carla Bruni in 2008, was charged on Thursday with misuse of public funds. He is suspected of taking kickbacks from the sale of submarines to Pakistan in the 1990s. Bazire, a former political aide who is now a director of French luxury goods group LVMH, was detained by police and his home and office were searched. Thierry Gaubert, another friend and adviser to Sarkozy for many years, was also charged and placed under investigation on suspicion that he carried cash from kickbacks into France in suitcases. Judges are investigating whether kickbacks from arms sales were used to illegally fund the failed presidential campaign of former rightwing prime minister Edouard Balladur in 1995. Sarkozy was Balladur’s budget minister as well as spokesman for his campaign, which was run by Bazire. Lawyers for Bazire and Gaubert denied any involvement. The Élysée Palace issued a statement that said Sarkozy “never exercised the slightest authority in the campaign financing”. Sarkozy, who faces a presidential election in seven months, is under pressure as judges investigating the Karachi affair close in on his inner circle. A separate judicial inquiry is already looking at whether Sarkozy or his party members took cash f rom the billionaire L’Oréal heiress Liliane Bettencourt for illegal party funding . When he was elected in 2007, Sarkozy had promised an “irreproachable” France, presenting himself as a leader who would clean up corrupt French politics. This is now being ridiculed by the left. Sarkozy has not yet officially declared his candidacy in next year’s election, but he has been positioning himself to run, trying to create a more presidential image through his involvement in world affairs, in Libya and the Middle East. The Karachi saga goes beyond illegal party funding. In May 2002, a bomb attack on a bus in the city killed 15 people including 11 workers for a French naval defence company on their way to the dockyard to work on submarines that had been sold to Pakistan. French judges now believe it was a retaliation attack over unpaid government bribes. A top investigating judge has opened a fresh examination into a possible connection to kickbacks and party funding despite efforts by the state prosecutor to stop the inquiry. The arrest of Sarkozy’s friends follows another surprising twist. Two ex-wives involved in bitter and difficult divorce battles with key figures came forward and gave evidence to judges. An influential Franco-Lebanese arms broker and businessman, Zied Takieddine, was last week charged with fraud over two arms contracts with Pakistan and Saudi Arabia in which he was allegedly the middleman. His ex-wife had testified to investigators. Then the trail led to Gaubert, whose ex-wife, a granddaughter of the last king of Italy, told judges of several trips to Switzerland in 1994 and 1995 when he returned with “voluminous suitcases full of banknotes”. Yet another sleaze inquiry was opened last week into assertions by one of Sarkozy’s Africa experts that the former president Jacques Chirac and prime minister Dominique de Villepin were handed briefcases of cash from African leaders to fund election campaigns. A Chirac adviser had claimed that Sarkozy also benefited. All have denied taking cash. Nicolas Sarkozy Arms trade Pakistan France Europe Angelique Chrisafis guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Former eBay CEO and California governor candidate replaces Léo Apotheker, who lasted just 11 months in the job Léo Apotheker has been fired as chief executive of Hewlett-Packard and replaced with Meg Whitman, the technology firm has announced. Following a board meeting, Whitman, the former chief executive of eBay and candidate for California governor, was confirmed as the replacement for Apotheker, who has been at the helm at Hewlett-Packard for only 11 months. Ray Lane, who has moved from non-executive chairman to executive chairman of HP’s board, said: “We are at a critical moment and we need renewed leadership to successfully implement our strategy and take advantage of the market opportunities ahead.” Referring to Apotheker, Lane said the board believes “the job of the HP CEO now requires additional attributes”. The board also plans to appoint an independent director. The management shake-up represents yet another turnaround strategy at one of Silicon Valley’s oldest – but most publicly dysfunctional – firms. Since joining HP in November, Apotheker’s strategic decisions had been drastic, and did little to inspire confidence. HP’s stock fell nearly 50% during his time at the helm. It dropped about 5% on Thursday. Hewlett-Packard’s board said it would not change its strategy to focus more on services than making computers – a change of direction designed by Apotheker. Wall Street should react favourably to a new leader, even if it would be HP’s third in six years, after Carly Fiorina (fired February 2005) and Mark Hurd (fired August 2010). But not all analysts were convinced. Although Whitman, 55, grew eBay from a 30-strong company with $86m revenues to one with 15,000 people and almost $8bn revenues, she also oversaw the ineffective $2.8bn purchase of Skype, and left in 2008. Her strengths are consumer-facing, not in the enterprise. Carter Lusher, chief analyst at Ovum, said: “Whitman would do little for the confidence of HP’s enterprise customers. Whitman’s expertise lies primarily in the consumer market, and an interim leader will just prolong the sense of uncertainty.” Apotheker, who joined from the customer management software company SAP in early November, was unable to even turn to his employees for support: his approval rating among them was just 25%, according to the recruitment site Glassdoor . That figure is down from 58% a month ago; but a month ago Apotheker had not decided to shut down HP’s TouchPad tablet business at a cost of hundreds of millions, spin off its revenue-generating PC business into a separate company, and turn HP – revered in Silicon Valley for decades as a company that invented hardware such as the inkjet printer – into a services-based business to compete with IBM. The purchase of the UK search technology company Autonomy would be part of that transformation. Apotheker’s plan made financial sense. HP is a huge company, with more than 320,000 staff, annual revenues of $120bn (£78bn) – mainly from large “enterprise” customers – and profits of about $5.5bn. It has four main divisions: Services; Storage & Networking; Personal Systems Group; and Imaging & Printing. Of those, PSG, which is the world’s largest supplier of PCs, is the biggest by revenue – but its 6% profit margin is the lowest within the company by some way. The Guardian’s own analysis shows that if the PSG division could be spun off without harming other divisions, HP’s overall profitability would rise from 7.7% to 12%. That should delight investors. Yet it hasn’t. Partly it is the abrupt chopping and changing: the TouchPad was killed after just 48 days on sale , intended to ride the Apple iPad wave of interest, to widespread amazement, as the software had seemed promising. The 500-strong team behind the WebOS software are reportedly being laid off. And partly it’s that HP has messed things up, twice being forced to announce its quarterly results early after the data leaked out – an error that might be forgiven once but not twice by Wall Street traders. The recent changes left staff furious. One existing employee, a marketing director based in Boston, recently commented on Glassdoor: “The man[Apotheker] is flat-out incompetent. We’ve gone from [one] fiasco to the next under his reign.” Another was less blunt, but still excoriating: “The organisational structure is cobbled together, full of redundancies – everyone’s empowered to say no, no one is empowered to say yes. If Leo wanted to run SAP, he should have stayed at SAP.” Staff generally give the company only an “OK” rating – 2.5 out of 5. And there are murmurs too that the PSG spinoff is being reconsidered. But the PC business will not be more profitable in the future than it is now. IBM exited it smartly in 2004, selling it to Lenovo, and has become a services powerhouse since. HP owns EDS, the services company; its future would clearly lie in services. To Lusher, the damage to HP and Apotheker has already been done. “This only reinforces that HP is a company that is in severe disarray,” he said. “That the board would be considering a change in CEO less that 10 months after Apotheker took over is a damning indictment of not just the new CEO but the board itself. Having approved the recent strategy changes, it seems spineless just a month later to be potentially jettisoning that plan and its architect.” Brian White of Ticonderoga Securities said in a research note: “Leo was placed in the role on a short-term basis to take the fall for the company’s under-investment under the previous CEO … At the same time, we believe a new CEO could begin to build credibility for HP and join the company after quite a bit of damage has already been done.” Hewlett-Packard Software United States Charles Arthur guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …While CNN gave two tough interviews to Palin-bashing author Joe McGinniss, HLN's Joy Behar joked around with him on her Wednesday show. She referenced his newest tome on Sarah Palin and her family, full of nasty gossip and rumors, and jokingly asked “What, do you have a death wish, Joe?” In the previous segment, Behar had made fun of Rush Limbaugh's past drug abuse in her interview with Levi Johnston. “Your mother was selling Oxycontin?” she asked Johnston. “What's she – what's up with that? Does she know Rush Limbaugh?” Not finished with her fun, the HLN host had a laugh over McGinniss' creepy move into the house next door to the Palins. “Could you see Russia from that house?” Behar joked. In the interview, McGinniss charged Palin as a “blatant racist and a “religious extremist,” but Behar challenged only the latter accusation, remarking that Palin was barely a churchgoer – according to Levi Johnston, whom she used to fact-check McGinniss' book in the previous interview. Behar did press McGinniss over his radical stories against Palin and her family – but while treating him as a respectable reporter, not the author of a book filled with gossip and rumors. She also gave credence to the fringe conspiracy theory peddled by the Daily Beast, that prominent Republican figures are “Dominionists” and are pushing to end the separation of church and state in America. When McGinniss accused Palin of belonging to such a sect, Behar asked “how is she any different from, say, Rick Perry?” The “Rogue” author absurdly claimed that the media gave Palin a pass in 2008, saying that “the mainstream media paid no attention to her background, nobody did any homework on her in 2008, running for vice president.” Behar made no attempt to challenge his assumption, instead attempting to explain it. “Well, the media likes sort of a star. She's kind of a star.” [Video below. Click here for audio.]
Continue reading …Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg announces Spotify and Netflix tie-ins, as competition from Twitter and Google prompt move Facebook has unveiled sweeping changes to its website – including partnerships with major music and film companies – in a bid to transform the world’s biggest social network into a key entertainment hub. Mark Zuckerberg, the founder of Facebook, on Thursday announced new partnerships with Spotify, Netflix, the Guardian and other media companies as he said that 800 million people worldwide now use the social network. “The last five years of social networking have been about getting people signed up,” Zuckerberg told Facebook’s f8 conference in San Francisco. “Until recently people weren’t sure how long the phenomenon would last. Now social networks are a ubiquitous tool used by billions of people around the world to stay connected every day.” Facebook has in recent months recently ramped up its attempts to attract and keep internet users on the site in the wake of competition from Twitter and a new rival in Google. Facebook is expected to hit the 1 billion user mark within weeks, having doubled the number of active users since February 2010. As part of the changes announced on Thursday, Facebook users will be able to automatically share activity such as viewing, listening and reading in a live “ticker” stream, once they have opted in to the feature. The new stream will be separate from the existing Facebook news feed, although popular items – such as the most frequently played songs among friends – will appear in the column. “We are making it so you can connect to
Continue reading …Shareholders shocked by plan to raise chief’s pay to £1.5m plus bonuses WPP has stunned its major investors by suggesting that Sir Martin Sorrell, its long-standing chief executive, should be awarded a pay rise of as much as 50% that could take his salary to £1.5m – and push up the potential bonuses he might also receive. The advertising and marketing group, founded by Sorrell and home to names such as JWT and Ogilvy & Mather, has not increased Sorrell’s £1m salary since January 2007 and is now arguing that the chief executive needs a boost in his basic pay to keep pace with his rivals. Jeffrey Rosen, the chairman of the remuneration committee at WPP, has told major shareholders the company wants to increase the size of Sorrell’s bonus potential as well as raising his basic pay. Basic salaries are important for chief executives – and other board directors – because bonuses and potential long-term incentive plans are usually set as a multiple of basic pay. Sorrell, who turned a shell company called Wire & Plastic Products into an empire that also includes media buyers Mediacom, market researchers Kantar and public relations firms Hill & Knowlton and Finsbury, has often ranked high in the Guardian’s executive pay surveys. In 2005 he pocketed £50m of shares after a long-term share scheme – known as a leadership equity acquisition plan or Leap – dating back to 1993 came to fruition. Last year he took home £4.2m after his £1m salary was enhanced by benefits, bonuses and shares. The high-level discussions about increasing Sorrell’s pay are taking place after other top executives at the company were given pay rises last year. The company endured a rebellion on the issue in June when more than 40% of investors failed to back the remuneration report, largely because Mark Read, chief executive of WPP Digital, was handed a 30% rise to take his salary to £425,000. The timing and scale of the pay rise being proposed for Sorrell, who is widely admired for his business acumen and commitment to WPP, has surprised investors. One said: “This is just not the time to be pushing for a pay rise.” Another pointed out that WPP had been preparing the ground after pointing out on a number of occasions that he had not had a rise in his basic salary for 2008, 2009 and 2010. In the latest annual report , WPP explained that Sorrell’s base salary had been due to be reviewed in November 2008 but he had told the compensation committee an increase “would not be appropriate in light of business conditions”. But the annual report added: “As part of the extensive review of the executive directors’ compensation at the end of 2010, the committee considers that an increase in base salary and adjustments to incentive opportunities are appropriate. Consideration of these issues has continued during 2011 and the committee intends to consult share owners before the proposals are finalised.” That consultation is understood to have begun in the summer and is now the subject of hot debate among investors, who admire Sorrell for his drive and ambition in expanding WPP but doubt that the executive is at risk of leaving the group he has founded to go to a rival. He has likened his relationship to WPP as “the closest a man can come to giving birth” and insisted that money is not his driving force. He took a loan against his shares in advertising company Saatchi & Saatchi to enable him to buy WPP and the City began to notice him once he pulled off the takeover of advertising network J Walter Thompson in 1997. He told the Observer in July 2010 : “I think when we did our first high-profile deal, which was JWT, I was definitely the outsider.” A WPP spokesman said: “As we said in our most recent annual report, Sir Martin Sorrell’s base salary has been unchanged since 1 January 2007 and Sir Martin declined a review due in November 2008 because of business conditions at the time. We also said that the compensation committee considered that an increase in base salary and adjustments to incentive opportunities were appropriate and that the committee intended to consult share owners before finalising proposals. “We are going through the very early stages of that process now.” WPP Sir Martin Sorrell Executive pay and bonuses WPP Advertising Jill Treanor guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …NY Rep. Hinchey argues against the GOP continuing resolution due to the disaster relief provisions Someone should have told Eric Cantor holding disaster aid hostage for budget cuts was a bad idea. Maybe someone did, but he chose not to listen. The net result of that was a disastrous vote yesterday in the House of Representatives on what should have been a routine continuing resolution to keep agreed-upon budget numbers in place. What happened instead highlights the ongoing and rising tension between the tea party freshmen and the rest of the Republican party. ThinkProgress : Attached to the bill was a highly controversial measure that gives the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s Disaster Relief Fund additional funding to pay for both recent disaster relief efforts and recovery projects from disasters that may have happened years ago — but only by stealing $1.5 BILLION from a successful job creation program to “offset” the spending to help disaster victims. Strangely, Republicans steal $1.5 BILLION from the jobs program, but only offset $1 BILLION in disaster funding. THE JOBS REPUBLICANS WANT TO KILL: The program they want to steal $1.5 BILLION from, the Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Program , has already created approximately 40,000 American jobs by spurring American manufacturing in 11 states across the country. The program, if it remains fully funded, stands to create at least another 50-60,000 American jobs in states like Missouri, Indiana, Ohio, Florida, Louisiana, Illinois, and Michigan. Democrats whipped against the bill because of its job-killing nature, and it was defeated on a final bipartisan count of 195-230. Here’s the thing: Had Republicans not defected, it would have passed. So the question is, which Republicans defected and why? Can you guess? Yes, tea party freshmen bolted because it didn’t cut enough spending, and because they had vowed not to pass omnibus spending bills. So Democrats bolted because it killed jobs and inadequately funded disaster relief and Republicans bolted because it didn’t kill enough jobs or cut enough spending. Oh, and they think it’s totally okay to shut down the government, too. That leaves John Boehner to figure out whether he’s going to keep pandering to the extreme right wing of his party or try to fashion a compromise with Democrats. According to this National Journal report, he’s very frustrated with the tea party folks right now . Boehner was described as “spitting nails” during a closed-door member meeting on Wednesday, and his harsh talk demonstrated that the usually unflappable speaker is reaching something close to a breaking point with his internally divided conference. Those close to Boehner said there is a growing anger in the leadership that some in the freshman class and other intractable conservatives pay no mind to the legislative dangers of abandoning leadership—especially at a time when Democrats feel as if they and President Obama are fighting for their political lives. Top GOP leadership aides said Boehner knew the stopgap bill would fail and wanted to prove to the Republicans who defected how their actions would force party leaders to negotiate with Democrats to win passage of the must-pass bill. A government shutdown is not an acceptable alternative to GOP leaders, a message Boehner reiterated on Thursday. “There’s no threat of government shutdown—let’s just get this out there,” he said. In private, Boehner has grown tired of what he dismissively calls the “know-it-alls who have all the right answers.” Boehner knew what a defeat would mean—a more costly spending bill, one that provides more emergency disaster relief and contains fewer budget offsets. Oh, John Boehner, you should have gotten some lessons from former Speaker Nancy Pelosi on this. There comes a time where you just have to decide that the hard line won’t work. At some point compromises have to be made. Had Boehner done a deal with Pelosi to include the just-passed Senate Disaster Relief bill as an amendment, it’s possible it could have passed and sent a strong message to Those Who Have The Right Answers. Instead, he’s got a public rift in his party and what looks to be a public spat with Eric Cantor. Cantor framed his arguments as opposition to the Senate disaster bill, but he was really spewing the tea party lines. From Politico , before the vote was taken: “The real debate here is whether we’re going to stick to the agreement of the debt ceiling, which said that we’ve got the fixed number at the top…and are we going to start spending more?” Cantor said Wednesday. “Are we going to allow, yet again, another opportunity to take advantage of a crisis? We’re not for that. We’re for getting the people the disaster relief they need and do so in a responsible manner, and that’s why what you’ll see today is a CR that’ll pass the House floor and go over to the Senate.” Oops! So what did he say afterward? Not much . Oh, by the way. The program they wanted to strip funds from? The Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Program? Well, that’s an interesting thing, as it turns out, since Darrell Issa pushed for a federal loan guarantee under that very program for a campaign donor. The guarantee wasn’t granted, and the company has returned deposits made for the three-wheeled electric vehicles. Was the choice to cut that program and Issa’s current hair-trigger investigations of green energy programs revenge or stewardship? I’ll let you make that call.
Continue reading …