By William Pfaff The great campaign to create a new Middle East and Central Asia, slay Islam’s violent extremists and build a radiant new world of democracy and capitalism is moving backward. Related Entries December 21, 2010 Foreign Policy Review Suggests a Losing Effort December 21, 2010 President Obama’s Christmas Gift to AT&T (And Comcast And Verizon)
Continue reading …By Amy Goodman One of President Barack Obama’s signature campaign promises was to protect the freedom of the Internet. Jump ahead to December 2010, where Obama is clearly in the back seat, being driven by Internet giants like AT&T, Verizon and Comcast. Related Entries December 21, 2010 Foreign Policy Review Suggests a Losing Effort December 21, 2010 President Obama’s Christmas Gift to AT&T (And Comcast And Verizon)
Continue reading …Howard Kurtz on Tuesday published a surprisingly glowing piece about one of the most hate-filled commentators on television. In ” Rush Limbaugh's TV Nemesis ” posted at the Daily Beast, Kurtz even seemed to condone Ed Schultz's disgusting pet names for Limbaugh, Sarah Palin, and Chris Christie: read more
Continue reading …At the NRO corner, Sarah Palin (or her ghostwriter) takes a moment to rally the Republican Senators against the evil that is New START . “It’s a trap!” she screams. “Run away!” New START recognizes a link between offensive and defensive weapons – a position the Russians have sought for years.
Continue reading …enlarge I just love this statement from Senator Mitch McConnell to Republico …er…Politico: Indeed, McConnell is signaling that the White House should be prepared in the new Congress to support Republican policies – not the other way around. “If the president is willing to do things that we believe in, I don’t think we’re going to say, ‘No, Mr. President we’re not going to do this any longer because you’re now with us,’” McConnell told POLITICO in his ornate office across from the old Senate chamber. “Any time the president is willing to do what we think is in the best interest of the American people, we have something to talk about.” So let’s see if I have this right. McConnell is saying that as long as the president does Republican things, they’re down with it. Except President Obama has done Republican things and they’re not down with it. Take the DREAM Act, for example. It was one of those Republican co-sponsored things. A bill where Republicans not only voted for it, but signed on as sponsors. And yet, it failed. Yes, it failed partially because of Democrats, but also because of Republicans who do Republican things . Like Orrin Hatch, for example, who was an original co-sponsor. The individual mandate in the health care act? Republican thing. Where was McConnell? That’s right. Not doing Republican things. Original START treaty? Republican thing. So really, let’s just be real. McConnell just spewed a whole bunch of words that sound all tough and full of high-riding hubris, but they mean nothing. Fortunately, some Democrats get that. To Democrats, McConnell’s comments confirm their suspicions: that his motivations are rooted first and foremost in politics on his desire to beat their party no matter the price. After McConnell’s comments last month that his top political goal was to make Obama a one-term president, frustrated Senate Democrats said in private meetings that their party needed to take a harder line against Republicans to counter the GOP leader. “If McConnell is going to operate that his major first political goal is to make Obama a one-termer, I don’t know how the Senate operates well,” said Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio). It’s sad to me that McConnell views the death of the appropriations bill as a big win. As a Champion Porker himself, he managed to convince Senate Republicans to stand tall against…Republican Things. But Democrats saw pure hypocrisy in McConnell’s stance, given the $113 million in pet projects that appropriators included at his request. “It was really rich for Mitch McConnell to say that somehow that this was a Democratic plot that had been somehow hatched in a backroom, and they were standing up to stop it,” Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) said. “It really just was that a bunch of them thought they could have it both ways, and at the 11th hour, they thought that they couldn’t.” Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D-Md.), a senior appropriator who has served with McConnell for 23 years, said she was “very bitter” that Republicans threw “us under the bus when we actually went for the mark that Sen. McConnell himself wants.” Asked what her impressions of the Republican leaders were, Mikulski said: “I don’t know them anymore. … I’m really frustrated with this kind of temper tantrum politics that we have going on here.” Temper tantrum politics. Perfect. Another Republican Thing.
Continue reading …How is one to make sense of the FCC’s big vote Tuesday? Does it represent a gain for the net-neutrality cause, or is the corporate takeover of the Web upon us in earnest? Well, one thing seems certain: Nobody is all that happy with the outcome—except, that is, for some lobbyists.
Continue reading …During her 1PM ET hour show on MSNBC on Tuesday, host Andrea Mitchell sympathized with exiting Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, remarking that the California Democrat having to hand over the gavel to John Boehner in January has “got to be painful,” but that Pelosi is “doing it with class.” Mitchell made the comments after talking to Politico's congressional bureau chief Martin Kady about a recent interview Pelosi conducted with the political website. Mitchell cited excerpts: “Pelosi says quote, 'I'm obviously devastated by the loss we had' but she also says she 'feels serene' and is already working on getting Democrats to win back the House, a tall order.” Kady portrayed Pelosi as defiant: “I mean she's really still promoting the accomplishments of the Democratic congress, even the accomplishments that some believe, you know, may have cost her some seats in this House.” read more
Continue reading …Not doing much to convince certain detractors that “The Daily Show” is in cahoots with the Obama administration, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs voiced his hope , during a press briefing on Tuesday, that Jon Stewart would be able to … Related Entries December 21, 2010 Obama Scores a Victory, Along With Some Vindication December 20, 2010 Congress Heads for Holiday Overtime
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Mark Steyn is filling in for Sean Hannity this week on Fox, and he wanted to have an in-depth, thoughtful discussion of the START nuclear-missile treaty. Naturally, this meant he brought on wingnut actor Jon Voight , who springs to mind immediately as an careful and knowledgeable analyst of nuclear issues, thanks to his incisive portrayals of FDR in Pearl Harbor and Jonas Hodges in 24 . And it was deeply insightful indeed. It opened up a tremendous window on the full-blown idiocy and paranoia of the wingnut Right. F’r instance: VOIGHT: And now I hear Obama trying to convince the American people that if we give up our nuclear weapons, this will set a fine example and all other countries will follow suit. What a dangerous and naive notion that is. If President Reagan wasn’t such a powerful force of strength, we never would have seen Premier Gorbachev take down the Berlin Wall. In reality, of course, it was Reagan who opened the negotiations with the Soviets in 1982 that eventually led to the first START treaty, ratified in 1992 under George H.W. Bush. Reagan often remarked in his speeches that his “ultimate goal” was the “total elimination of nuclear weapons.” Maybe Jon was too busy on the set of Lookin’ To Get Out back then or something. Because he nattered on in this vein for awhile — including this utterly incoherent bit: VOIGHT: Well, our President Kennedy in September of 1961 and by the way, of course he served in the World War II nearly losing his life and he stated that American military might is the only way to keep our freedom. Of course, President Reagan was of the same point of view. And thank God he had the foresight not to sign away our national missile defense when he saw the world full of presidents and future threats from multiple nuclear powers. Steyn obviously found this deeply insightful: STEYN: Do you think the Republicans are going to stand firm on this? The president tonight seems to be pretty confident he can get enough Republicans to get on board with this thing to pass it with 67 votes. Are you confident the Republican Party will stand firm? VOIGHT: Well, I certainly hope, so. And I think, again, a lot of it has to do with the American people. Get on the phones, folks, and make sure that we encourage our senators to reject this thing. You know, I don’t — we have seen this before. We have seen it coming towards Christmas as well. This idea that we push something through and people are thinking about, you know, presents for their grandchildren and wanting to get out of town, they come in and no one is thorough in their questioning or their reading of the materials. And they push something through. I don’t know how many more wrong Obama policies we need to see before we wake up to the possibility that this man is capable of destroying our country. The whole segment reminded me of an earlier Jon Voight performance : 1st Lt. Milo Minderbinder: I want to serve this to the men. Taste it and let me know what you think. [Yossarian takes a bite] Yossarian: What is it? 1st Lt. Milo Minderbinder: Chocolate covered cotton. Yossarian: What are you, crazy? 1st Lt. Milo Minderbinder: No good, huh? Yossarian: For Christ’s sake, you didn’t even take the seeds out. 1st Lt. Milo Minderbinder: Is it really that bad? Yossarian: It’s cotton!
Continue reading …