Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 1964)
Righties are mad that so much got done during the lame-duck session. Cue the whining

Click here to view this media As Ezra Klein observes, the lame-duck session of Congress was unusually productive. And one of the keys was that, for a change, there actually were a few Republicans who decided to be, you know, sane: The incumbent — and the outgoing — Republicans know that the fact that Republicans will have more power in 2011 doesn’t necessarily mean that they’ll use that power to pass sensible legislation. So those of them who wanted to pass sensible legislation decided to get it all done now, even if that meant handing Reid and Obama a slew of apparent victories in the lame-duck session. Ooooooh! That wascawwy Obama! Laura Ingraham and Dick Morris were all worked up about it last night on The O’Reilly Factor, turning blue in the face Morris: But what is crucial to focus on, is they didn’t get any spending cuts in return! Had the Republicans simply said, ‘No dice. This is an illegitimate, lame-duck session of people who are not entitled to vote because they were defeated. And we’re not going to pass anything, and we’re going to do it on January 2, and then we’re going to demand spending cuts!’ Which now will have to be fought for in the debt limit ceiling or the new budget. And in the meantime the deficit keeps clicking. Morris then went on to list all the Republican Senators who were going to be facing primaries — from Tea Party challengers, no doubt — in the near future because of their various sins in the lame-duck session. Considering this is the guy who predicted a 100-seat gain for Republicans in the House, I’m sure they’re quaking. But I’m also struck by Morris’s proposal: Evidently he doesn’t care that the Constitution pretty explicitly lays out how this election stuff works. Congress keeps meeting after elections, and new members do not take office till they take their oaths. It’s all there in the 20th Amendment. Don’t these guys have great reverence for the Constitution? Except, as always, the parts they find inconvenient. Like every other Republican right now, Morris also seems to have conveniently forgotten about the 1998 lame-duck session when Republicans impeached President Clinton . Which is quite a remarkable case of amnesia.

Continue reading …

It seems that every year, American pop culture continues to push the envelope of what is acceptable in society, and 2010 was no different. From Cee-Lo Green’s hit “F**k You” to Enrique Iglesias’ new song set to release next year titled, “I’m F**king You” the “F” word is going mainstream. One has to wonder if the media will ask the question: Is there anything attention-seekers won’t include in a song? Iglesias is an internationally recognized artist famous for his fairly tame, catchy romantic pop tunes, such as the smashing single “Hero” which topped the UK charts in 2001. But just ten years later, Iglesias has decided to seek more fame with a raunchy new song, set to debut in 2011 called “Tonight (I’m F**king You).” The boundary-pushing lyrics include: read more

Continue reading …

If they change these rules, it should help — a lot. The fact that the president hasn’t even been able to get circuit judges confirmed without having to bargain for them shows how really destructive Senate rules have become. Looks like the Democratic senators are ready to fight: All Democratic senators returning next year have signed a letter to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., urging him to consider action to change long-sacrosanct filibuster rules. The letter, delivered this week, expresses general frustration with what Democrats consider unprecedented obstruction and asks Reid to take steps to end those abuses. While it does not urge a specific solution, Democrats said it demonstrates increased backing in the majority for a proposal, championed by Sen. Tom Udall, D-N.M., and others, weaken the minority’s ability to tie the Senate calendar into parliamentary knots. Among the chief revisions that Democrats say will likely be offered: Senators could not initiate a filibuster of a bill before it reaches the floor unless they first muster 40 votes for it, and they would have to remain on the floor to sustain it. That is a change from current rules, which require the majority leader to file a cloture motion to overcome an anonymous objection to a motion to proceed, and then wait 30 hours for a vote on it. “There need to be changes to the rules to allow filibusters to be conducted by people who actually want to block legislation instead of people being able to quietly say ‘I object’ and go home,” said Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo. This year, McCaskill lined up backing from more than two-thirds of senators for elimination of secret holds, which allow a senator to block action on a bill or nomination anonymously. She said that Democrats will also push plans to force senators who place holds to do it publicly. After weeks of Democratic Caucus discussions during which newer members pushed various plans to limit filibusters, reformers are increasingly confident that they can defy predictions by Republicans and many pundits that rules changes will not happen in the near term. A Democratic leadership aide said that Democrats expect to “do something on timing” next month, specifically by seeking to prevent 30-hour waiting periods on motions to proceed. We’ve been reporting on this for awhile now. Here’s hoping it succeeds.

Continue reading …
Rachel Maddow: ‘All Hail Shep Smith At Fox News’

Click here to view this media Continuing the theme of this week of publicly shaming Republican Senators who’ve voted to deny 9/11 First Responders, Rachel sings the praises of Fox News’ Shepard Smith for calling them on this. RACHEL MADDOW:Shep Smith making a hullabaloo on his show about the Republicans who are not supporting health care for 9/11 first responders means that those Republicans might feel compelled to explain publicly why they don’t support health care for 9/11 first responders. … All hail Shep Smith at Fox News, and I’m not kidding. Because Fox News is an outlet that can get return calls from Republican senators most of the time, unlike some other people I know who shall remain nameless, but who are me.

Continue reading …
ABC’s Roberts Omits ‘Illegal’ from Dream Act Discussion, Calls Tax Cuts ‘Giving Something Away’
Continue reading …

Looks like WikiLeaks has Bank of America’s PR department working overtime. They’re buying up negative domain names in anticipation of an unconfirmed but hotly rumored release. According to Domain Name Wire, the US bank has been aggressively registering domain names including its board of Directors’ and senior executives’ names followed by “sucks” and “blows”. For example, the company registered a number of domains for CEO Brian Moynihan: BrianMoynihanBlows.com, BrianMoynihanSucks.com, BrianTMoynihanBlows.com, and BrianTMoynihanSucks.com. The wire report counted hundreds of such domain name registrations on 17 December alone. They were acquired through an intermediary that frequently registers domain names on behalf of large companies, says the report. Bank of America has reputedly established a ‘war room’ to draw up strategy and rebutt [sic] allegations likely to emerge from the publication of thousands of internal documents by WikiLeaks. As anxious as I am to see Bank of America suffer whatever consequences may result from their internal arrogance and malfeasance, I confess that declarations like this one from Assange make me uncomfortable, too. “We don’t want the bank to suffer unless it’s called for,” Assange told The Times. “But if its management is operating in a responsive way there will be resignations,” he said, without giving details about the material. After all, hostage-taking is hostage-taking, whether it’s Republicans or hackers.

Continue reading …
Parcel Bombs Rattle Rome

Two package bombs detonated at two different embassies in Rome, injuring one person at each post, on Thursday, in seemingly similar attacks to the spate of parcel bombs in Greece last month. A Swiss embassy employee suffered injuries to both hands in the first incident in Rome, and another was reportedly hurt at the Chilean embassy later, followed by the discovery of yet another suspicious mailing at the Ukranian embassy, according to the New York Times. The New York Times: After the first explosion, Foreign Minister Franco Frattini of Italy quickly condemned what he called a “deplorable act of violence” against the Swiss Embassy and wished the employee a speedy recovery. Counterterrorism officials have opened up an investigation, Italy’s ANSA news agency reported. After the explosion at the Swiss embassy, bomb disposal experts checked the building, located in the leafy Rome neighborhood of Parioli, but no one was evacuated, Reuters reported. “The ambassador is still on site,” Maurizio Mezzavilla, a police spokesman, told reporters at the scene. The parcel explosions come two days after Rome police discovered a defective explosive device under a subway seat. That package — containing tubes, wiring and a small amount of explosive powder — “was too rudimentary” to work, the police said. Read more

Continue reading …

Today's starter topic: Outgoing Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi is trying to get some help on becoming more likeable : “Lawmakers say she is consulting marketing experts about building a stronger brand. The most prominent of her new whisperers is Steven Spielberg, the Hollywood director whose films have been works of branding genius. Lawmakers said Spielberg has not reported toPelosi with a recommendation.” read more

Continue reading …
GOP Gets Ready to Rumble in 2011

Yes, Democrats scored some big legislative victories in Congress over the last two years, and, as President Obama noted earlier in the week, the Dems were able to overcome “gridlock” (in no small part because they commanded the majority of the House and Senate) and push through some big bills at the end of their 111th session. However, the next two years will be another story, as the GOP gains major ground in both houses and aims for the White House in 2012.

Continue reading …
C&L Opening Bell, 12-23-10

enlarge Ho, ho, ho, C&Lers! There have been lots of naughty people in the financial industry this year! But instead of a lump of coal, many of them are getting a big bonus check in their stockings! Let’s take a look at some of the yuletide cheer they’ve been spreading lately! NAUGHTY : When Mimi Ash arrived at her mountain chalet here for a weekend ski trip, she discovered that someone had broken into the home and changed the locks. When she finally got into the house, it was empty. All of her possessions were gone: furniture, her son’s ski medals, winter clothes and family photos. Also missing was a wooden box, its top inscribed with the words “Together Forever,” that contained the ashes of her late husband, Robert. The culprit, Ms. Ash soon learned, was not a burglar but her bank. This sort of thing has sadly become somewhat common , although stealing the ashes of this poor woman’s husband was a novel touch that I’m sure had the bank’s public relations staff running for the hills. Even so, some bank representative did their best to put a happy face on this fiasco: [B]anks and their representatives insist that situations like Ms. Ash’s represent just a tiny percentage of foreclosures. That reminds me of the time I got wasted, broke into a nearby army base, hot-wired a tank and drove it straight into a nearby orphanage. And when the judge at my trial asked me if I had anything to say for myself I replied, “But, Your Honor! This incident only represents a tiny percentage of my overall driving record!” Because, like, here’s the thing: This kind of crap shouldn’t happen at all. Period. The fact that it happened even once is a scandal but the fact that it’s happened to multiple people throughout the country shows that the banks simply have no idea what mortgages are and are not on their books anymore. The entire foreclosure process — which was designed very carefully to protect property rights — has become a lawless mess. If we had a smart center-left party in this country, we’d have Democratic representatives and senators scouring the airwaves shrieking at the top of their lungs about banks stealing deceased loved ones’ ashes — you know, the same way GOP congressfolk go on Fox News every night and shriek about some school somewhere in the middle of Nebraska that’s hosting a “Holiday Concert” rather than a Christmas concert. But we don’t so that’s that. NAUGHTY : A lawsuit filed against accounting giant Ernst & Young marks one of the biggest government efforts to date to assign blame for the financial crisis. The suit by Andrew Cuomo, the outgoing New York state attorney general, accuses Ernst & Young of helping Lehman Bros. cover up its declining health in the months before the investment bank’s collapse in September 2008. Cuomo’s complaint, filed in state court, focuses on a set of short-term transactions, begun in 2001, that allowed Lehman to look healthier and less risky when it reported quarterly financial data. The suit accuses Ernst & Young of approving the so-called Repo 105 transactions and signing off on financial reports that did not disclose them. Ernst & Young “sat by silently while Lehman deceived the public,” the complaint says. For those of you who don’t know, Repo 105 is a neat little accounting trick where short-term loans are recorded on the books as “sales.” The money from this “sale” is then used to pay down the company’s debt, making the firm appear less leveraged than it actually is, even though it actually has to repay the debt from the “sale” in very short order. If you perform enough of these transactions close to the end of a given quarter, you can make billions of dollars in liabilities magically vanish for a very short period of time. This is what Cuomo is alleging Ernst & Young helped Lehman do in the lead up to its spectacular crash in 2008. This is definitely a good one to watch. NAUGHTY : As the housing market came crashing down in 2008, the giant mortgage company Fannie Mae took an unprecedented step to help tackle the rising tide of foreclosures. It named an exclusive group of law firms that would help rapidly carry out the unsavory task of filing legal paperwork to remove homeowners from their homes. Today, problems with documents handled by firms on Fannie’s list – and a similar one created by its smaller rival Freddie Mac – are at the heart of federal and state probes over faulty foreclosure practices that now threaten to further undermine the housing market. Fannie and Freddie, the largest mortgage companies, shaped the practices being challenged in courtrooms around the country. They picked law firms that could foreclose fast and paid them based on how many foreclosures they could process. Speed was essential because delays cost the companies money – and, after they were taken over by the government two years ago, meant losses for taxpayers, too. Not only did the companies urge swift foreclosures, but in at least one case Fannie executives also greenlighted working with a firm that they knew firsthand had engaged in legally questionable practices, according to documents and interviews with lawyers and industry officials. Even though conservatives love to blame Fannie and Freddie for everything regarding the 2008 financial crash — after all, completely private companies can’t possibly do anything wrong — that doesn’t mean the two GSEs (and now to GOEs if you want to be precise) are blameless. In this case it seems as though they set the template for how other firms would handle their foreclosures in the wake of the housing crash. The result has been banks breaking into houses and stealing late relatives’ ashes. It would be nice if someone within the government would try to put the people at Frannie who initiated these sorts of practices in jail. You know, rule of law and other quaint notions like that. NAUGHTY : Deutsche Bank agreed to pay $553 million and admit to criminal wrongdoing on Tuesday, settling a long-running investigation into tax shelter fraud that prosecutors say generated billions of dollars in bogus tax benefits. In an agreement with the United States Attorney’s Office in Manhattan, Deutsche Bank will avoid prosecution for helping 2,100 customers evade taxes through 2,300 financial transactions. The arrangements, which took place between 1996 and 2002, helped wealthy Americans report more than $29 billion in fraudulent tax losses, according to the Justice Department. “This settlement marks another victory in the long effort to stop financial institutions, law firms and accounting firms from designing and marketing abusive tax shelters, and facilitating those who use them,” said Senator Carl Levin, chairman of the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, which has been investigating tax shelters for nearly a decade. What always amazes me about stuff like this is that rich people bother resorting to illegal methods to avoid paying taxes when in reality there are many perfectly legal ways to do it. I’m actually sorta surprised that the government bothered to clamp down on these sorts of practices at all since we’ve heard time and again that forcing rich people to pay any extra in taxes will make them cry and they’ll feel too sad to create jobs and all of Western Civilization will collapse. But good on the U.S. Attorney’s Office for doing its job. It makes me happy to see the government do useful things that don’t involve giving Paris Hilton a tax cut. That’s all I got for today, kids! I’ll see you next week – have a Merry Christmas!* *Yes, Fox News, I said it! Now stop hounding those poor school teachers throwing holiday parties!

Continue reading …