Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 193)

In a Thursday morning post setting the table for last night’s Republican presidential debate in Orlando, New York Times chief “Caucus” blog reporter Michael Shear became the latest Timesman to falsely finger the Tea Party audience at a CNN debate last week as cheering on the prospect of letting a hypothetical man die for lack of health insurance. Shear listed six things to watch for in Orlando last night. The last item: Give me liberty or… This debate will feature two fierce libertarians — Gary Johnson and Ron Paul — which should make for some interesting moments. Mr. Johnson has been excluded from most of the recent debates because of his low standing in the polls, but Fox News organizers said he managed to exceed 1 percent in five recent polls, the minimum standard they set for participation. Mr. Johnson, a former New Mexico governor, is probably best known for his support of the legalization of marijuana and other drugs — something Mr. Paul has also supported — so that issue is likely to re-emerge in this debate. And following the last debate, when Mr. Paul was asked whether a young man without health insurance should be left to go without treatment — which was greeted with some chants of “let him die” from the crowd — expect more questions along these lines. Has anyone at the Times actually watched the debate clip? It was debate moderator Wolf Blitzer who actually used the words “let him die,” when asking candidate Ron Paul a loaded question about letting a hypothetical man die for lack of health insurance. There is no auditory evidence anyone at all in the crowd shouted such a thing, much less enough people to form a constant “chant.” Columnist Paul Krugman on September 16 also falsely claimed “the crowd erupted with cheers and shouts of ‘Yeah!’” after Blitzer pressed Paul on the case of the hypothetical young man without health insurance, asking whether “society should just let him die.” Washington Post blogger Erik Wemple fact-checked the horrified liberal response of commentators like Krugman. This is how Wemple described what happened after debate host Wolf Blitzer raised his inflammatory question ( you can watch the clip at the Post ). A few jeers? Yes. Heckles? No question. “Audience” cheers? No way. The voices that can be heard in the video — perhaps two or three of them — don’t constitute an “audience” reaction. There were 1,100 people in the crowd. The episode is the clumsy work of a few loons or meatheads in the audience.

Continue reading …
NHS hospital managers may seek court orders to halt strikes

Unions fear use of British Airways-style tactics after employers’ group suggests that hospital trusts take legal advice Hospitals are being advised to consider blocking tactics to thwart as many as 700,000 staff taking industrial action on 30 November as part of the public sector day of action over pensions. Guidance from NHS Employers to the 400 hospital trusts and other care providers in England that it represents recommends they seek legal advice on preventing strikes. A document called Managing Industrial Disputes: Guidance for Employers in the NHS advises them to decide “if the unions may be acting unlawfully” and consider taking court action, depending on the risks and costs. Unions fear the advice will see hospitals seeking court orders to frustrate strikes by claiming that ballots have not been conducted in accordance with Britain’s tough employment laws. “This guidance does incite employers to consider using British Airways-style tactics and to try and trip unions up with legal technicalities,” said Rachael Maskell, a national officer for health with the union Unite, which represents about 100,000 NHS staff. BA has used trade union laws over the past 18 months to challenge strike ballots by cabin crew in the high court. Under the 1992 Trade Union and Labour Relations Act industrial action is illegal unless unions have complied with a range of legal responsibilities such as telling employers how many staff they are balloting, the result of the ballot and what type of action is planned, where and when. In 2009 a 12-day Christmas strike by BA cabin crew affiliated to Unite was thrown out because a ballot of more than 12,000 crew included 900 votes cast by employees who had taken voluntary redundancy, technically rendering their papers invalid. In 2010 a national rail strike at Network Rail by the RMT union was halted on a similar basis, when it transpired that the RMT had polled signal workers at defunct signal boxes. “We would be extremely concerned if this guidance could be interpreted as intimidating or designed to thwart the democratic process that trade unions are going through with their members,” said Lesley Mercer, director of employment services at the Chartered Society of Physiotherapists, which will decide next week whether to ballot its 35,000 members in the NHS about joining the day of action. Unions have recently been updating their records of members and of employers that would be affected by industrial action. Dean Royles, the director of NHS Employers, said that as well as wanting to minimise the impact on patient care, NHS organisations “will also want to ensure any action planned is lawful”. He also warned unions that “trade unions should be aware that the significant cost of industrial action – caused by factors such as the need to fill gaps in the workforce and reschedule elective operations – will only make it harder for the NHS to avoid job losses.” NHS Health Public sector pensions Public services policy Trade unions Public sector cuts Public finance Public sector pay Denis Campbell Dan Milmo guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
NHS hospital managers may seek court orders to halt strikes

Unions fear use of British Airways-style tactics after employers’ group suggests that hospital trusts take legal advice Hospitals are being advised to consider blocking tactics to thwart as many as 700,000 staff taking industrial action on 30 November as part of the public sector day of action over pensions. Guidance from NHS Employers to the 400 hospital trusts and other care providers in England that it represents recommends they seek legal advice on preventing strikes. A document called Managing Industrial Disputes: Guidance for Employers in the NHS advises them to decide “if the unions may be acting unlawfully” and consider taking court action, depending on the risks and costs. Unions fear the advice will see hospitals seeking court orders to frustrate strikes by claiming that ballots have not been conducted in accordance with Britain’s tough employment laws. “This guidance does incite employers to consider using British Airways-style tactics and to try and trip unions up with legal technicalities,” said Rachael Maskell, a national officer for health with the union Unite, which represents about 100,000 NHS staff. BA has used trade union laws over the past 18 months to challenge strike ballots by cabin crew in the high court. Under the 1992 Trade Union and Labour Relations Act industrial action is illegal unless unions have complied with a range of legal responsibilities such as telling employers how many staff they are balloting, the result of the ballot and what type of action is planned, where and when. In 2009 a 12-day Christmas strike by BA cabin crew affiliated to Unite was thrown out because a ballot of more than 12,000 crew included 900 votes cast by employees who had taken voluntary redundancy, technically rendering their papers invalid. In 2010 a national rail strike at Network Rail by the RMT union was halted on a similar basis, when it transpired that the RMT had polled signal workers at defunct signal boxes. “We would be extremely concerned if this guidance could be interpreted as intimidating or designed to thwart the democratic process that trade unions are going through with their members,” said Lesley Mercer, director of employment services at the Chartered Society of Physiotherapists, which will decide next week whether to ballot its 35,000 members in the NHS about joining the day of action. Unions have recently been updating their records of members and of employers that would be affected by industrial action. Dean Royles, the director of NHS Employers, said that as well as wanting to minimise the impact on patient care, NHS organisations “will also want to ensure any action planned is lawful”. He also warned unions that “trade unions should be aware that the significant cost of industrial action – caused by factors such as the need to fill gaps in the workforce and reschedule elective operations – will only make it harder for the NHS to avoid job losses.” NHS Health Public sector pensions Public services policy Trade unions Public sector cuts Public finance Public sector pay Denis Campbell Dan Milmo guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Phone hacking: New York lawyers exploring News Corp class action

Top 9/11 lawyer teams up with Milly Dowler solicitor to pursue possible bribery lawsuit in US courts A prominent New York lawyer who represents several families of victims of 9/11 has confirmed that he is exploring the possibility of a class action lawsuit against News Corporation on behalf of victims of its phone-hacking activities. Norman Siegel, a former head of the New York civil liberties union, said he was actively investigating legal options in both federal and New York state courts in regard to allegations that News Corp employees bribed police in the UK. He is working alongside a second New York lawyer, Steve Hyman, and in tandem with Mark Lewis of the UK firm Taylor Hampton, who represented the family of Milly Dowler. “The allegations of phone hacking and bribery against News Corporation are serious and substantial, and we will approach this initial exploration with that same seriousness,” Siegel said. Siegel has advised 9/11 families on the ongoing FBI investigation into allegations that News of the World reporters tried to break into the phone records of 9/11 victims soon after the terrorist outrages. In August he met the US attorney general, Eric Holder, to demand a full inquiry into the allegations, which were first aired by the Daily Mirror. The cross-Atlantic team of lawyers will be seeking to find out whether a class action on behalf of victims of NoW phone hacking can be launched in the US. They will also be exploring the possibility of extracting witness statements from News Corp directors, including Rupert Murdoch and his son James, in advance of any class action being lodged with the courts. However, legal experts said any action would face an uphill battle under anti-bribery laws. Mike Koehler, a specialist in anti-bribery legislation based at Butler University in Indianapolis, said that recourse to the courts was severely restricted for private claimants. The main anti-bribery law, the Foreign Corrupt Practices act, was introduced to prosecute US-based companies, of which News Corp is one, from using bribery to acquire an unfair business advantage overseas. But the courts have taken the view that any prosecution should be primarily carried out by either the Department of Justice or the financial watchdog Securities and Exchange Commission. Koehler said attempts have been made in the past to use the FCPA to launch lawsuits on behalf of private shareholders, but with only limited success. “Some of the cases have been settled for their ‘nuisance value’ – in other words: to get rid of them – but by and large these cases haven’t been very successful,” he said. John Coffee, a law professor at Columbia University, also cautioned that a class action on behalf of phone-hacking victims in the UK would face hurdles in the US. “The injuries are just too diverse and variable for this to be susceptible to class treatment.” One avenue the lawyers will be pursuing is to seek witness statements from News Corp directors, including the Murdochs. This could also be legally problematic, experts warned, as any civil action is likely to be overshadowed in the courts by the ongoing criminal investigation into News Corp activities. Earlier this week Bloomberg reported that the justice department has written to News Corp asking for information relating to the allegations that News of the World staff bribed British police in exchange for tips for stories. Phone hacking September 11 2001 News Corporation Rupert Murdoch United States Ed Pilkington guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Phone hacking: New York lawyers exploring News Corp class action

Top 9/11 lawyer teams up with Milly Dowler solicitor to pursue possible bribery lawsuit in US courts A prominent New York lawyer who represents several families of victims of 9/11 has confirmed that he is exploring the possibility of a class action lawsuit against News Corporation on behalf of victims of its phone-hacking activities. Norman Siegel, a former head of the New York civil liberties union, said he was actively investigating legal options in both federal and New York state courts in regard to allegations that News Corp employees bribed police in the UK. He is working alongside a second New York lawyer, Steve Hyman, and in tandem with Mark Lewis of the UK firm Taylor Hampton, who represented the family of Milly Dowler. “The allegations of phone hacking and bribery against News Corporation are serious and substantial, and we will approach this initial exploration with that same seriousness,” Siegel said. Siegel has advised 9/11 families on the ongoing FBI investigation into allegations that News of the World reporters tried to break into the phone records of 9/11 victims soon after the terrorist outrages. In August he met the US attorney general, Eric Holder, to demand a full inquiry into the allegations, which were first aired by the Daily Mirror. The cross-Atlantic team of lawyers will be seeking to find out whether a class action on behalf of victims of NoW phone hacking can be launched in the US. They will also be exploring the possibility of extracting witness statements from News Corp directors, including Rupert Murdoch and his son James, in advance of any class action being lodged with the courts. However, legal experts said any action would face an uphill battle under anti-bribery laws. Mike Koehler, a specialist in anti-bribery legislation based at Butler University in Indianapolis, said that recourse to the courts was severely restricted for private claimants. The main anti-bribery law, the Foreign Corrupt Practices act, was introduced to prosecute US-based companies, of which News Corp is one, from using bribery to acquire an unfair business advantage overseas. But the courts have taken the view that any prosecution should be primarily carried out by either the Department of Justice or the financial watchdog Securities and Exchange Commission. Koehler said attempts have been made in the past to use the FCPA to launch lawsuits on behalf of private shareholders, but with only limited success. “Some of the cases have been settled for their ‘nuisance value’ – in other words: to get rid of them – but by and large these cases haven’t been very successful,” he said. John Coffee, a law professor at Columbia University, also cautioned that a class action on behalf of phone-hacking victims in the UK would face hurdles in the US. “The injuries are just too diverse and variable for this to be susceptible to class treatment.” One avenue the lawyers will be pursuing is to seek witness statements from News Corp directors, including the Murdochs. This could also be legally problematic, experts warned, as any civil action is likely to be overshadowed in the courts by the ongoing criminal investigation into News Corp activities. Earlier this week Bloomberg reported that the justice department has written to News Corp asking for information relating to the allegations that News of the World staff bribed British police in exchange for tips for stories. Phone hacking September 11 2001 News Corporation Rupert Murdoch United States Ed Pilkington guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Pakistan’s army chief denies US allegations of terror collusion

General Ashfaq Kayani dismisses as ‘baseless’ US accusations that spy agency helped insurgents carry out attacks in Kabul Pakistan’s army chief has dismissed allegations that his spy agency had helped Afghan militants attack the US embassy in Kabul, insisting on Friday that the charges were baseless and part of a public “blame game” detrimental to peace in Afghanistan. General Ashfaq Kayani’s terse statement suggested Islamabad had no immediate intention of acting on renewed American demands that it attack the Haqqani militant faction in their main base in northwest Pakistan. It also ramped up a dispute between the two nominally allied nations that has exposed their increasingly deteriorating relationship. Admiral Mike Mullen, chairman of the US joint chiefs of staff, accused the army’s Inter-Services Intelligence agency on Thursday of supporting Haqqani insurgents in planning and executing a 22-hour assault on the US Embassy in Afghanistan last week and a truck bomb that wounded 77 American soldiers days earlier. Kayani said in a statement that the allegations were “very unfortunate and not based on facts.” The claims were the most serious yet by an American official against nuclear-armed Pakistan, which Washington has given billions in civilian and military aid over the last 10 years to try to secure its co-operation inside Afghanistan and against al-Qaida. Kayani’s statement appeared to imply that Pakistan’s contacts with the Haqqani network were part of efforts to bring it to the negotiating table. The United States, Kabul and European countries all agree that a peace deal will be needed to end the war, though not all agree on whether the Haqqanis, which have links to al-Qaida, should be included. The statement said that “on the specific question of contacts with Haqqanis … Admiral Mullen knows fully well which … countries are in contact with the Haqqanis. Singling out Pakistan is neither fair nor productive.” Kayani, regarded as the most powerful man in Pakistan, said the “blame game” between it and the US should give way to constructive dialogue over the future of a peaceful Afghanistan. The Haqqani insurgent network is widely believed to be based in Pakistan’s North Waziristan tribal area along the Afghan border. The group has historical ties to Pakistani intelligence, dating back to the war against the Soviets in Afghanistan in the 1980s. Mullen’s words marked the first time an American official had tied Pakistan’s intelligence agency directly to the attacks and signaled a significant shift in the US approach to Islamabad. In the past, US criticism of Pakistan largely had been relayed in private conversations with the countries’ leaders while American officials publicly offered encouraging words for Islamabad’s participation in the terror fight. Mullen did not provide specific evidence backing up his accusations or indicate what the US would do if Pakistan refuses to cut ties to the Haqqani network. The US has repeatedly demanded that Pakistan attack the insurgents and prevent them from using the country’s territory. Pakistan Afghanistan US military Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) United States Nato guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Physicists urge caution over apparent speed of light violation

Scientists react with disbelief and calls for more experiments after results suggest neutrinos can travel faster than light Scientists around the world reacted with cautious shock on Friday to results from an Italian laboratory that seemed to show that certain subatomic particles can travel faster than light. If true, the finding breaks one of the most fundamental laws of physics and raises bizarre possibilities including time travel and shortcuts via hidden extra dimensions. Scientists at the Opera (Oscillation Project with Emulsion-tRacking Apparatus) experiment in Gran Sasso, Italy, found that neutrinos sent through the Earth to its detectors from Cern , 730km away in Geneva, arrived earlier than they should have. The journey would take a beam of light around 2.4 milliseconds to complete, but after running the Opera experiment for three years and timing the arrival of 15,000 neutrinos, the scientists have calculated that the particles arrived at Gran Sasso 60 billionths of a second earlier, with an error margin of plus or minus 10 billionths of a second. The speed of light in a vacuum is 299,792,458 metres per second, so the neutrinos were apparently travelling at 299,798,454 metres per second. A cornerstone of modern physics is the idea that nothing can travel faster than light does in a vacuum. At the turn of the 20th century, Albert Einstein encapsulated this idea in his theory of special relativity, which proposes that the laws of physics are the same for all observers and led to the famous equation E=mc 2 , indicating that mass and energy are equivalent. Brian Cox, a professor of particle physics at the University of Manchester, urged caution. “If you’ve got something travelling faster than light, then it’s the most profound discovery of the last 100 years or more in physics. It’s a very, very big deal,” he said on BBC 6 Music on Friday . “It requires a complete rewriting of our understanding of the universe.” Professor Jim Al-Khalili at the University of Surrey said it was most likely that something was skewing the results. “If the neutrinos have broken the speed of light, it would overturn a keystone theory from the last century of physics. That’s possible, but it’s far more likely that there is an error in the data. So let me put my money where my mouth is: if the Cern experiment proves to be correct and neutrinos have broken the speed of light, I will eat my boxer shorts on live TV.” At the Gran Sasso lab, where the results were measured, Opera co-ordinator Antonio Ereditato said his team was “recovering from the shock” of the discovery. “We are competent experimentalists, we made a measurement and we believe our measurement is sound,” he said. “Now it is up to the community to scrutinise it. We are not in a hurry. We are saying, tell us what we did wrong, redo the measurement if you can. There will be all sorts of science fiction writers who will give their own opinions on what this means, but we don’t want to enter that game.” If the measurements are shown to be correct, physicists will have to modify their understanding of special relativity to take the results into account. Fortunately, there are several theories that could help explain the Italian team’s results by showing how neutrinos might appear to travel faster than the speed of light when, in reality, that is not the case. Heinrich Paes at Dortmund University and colleagues believe it might be possible for neutrinos to move through hidden, extra dimensions of space and effectively take shortcuts through space-time. “The extra dimension is warped in a way that particles moving through it can travel faster than particles that go through the known three dimensions of space. It’s like a shortcut through this extra dimension. So it looks like particles are going faster than light, but actually they don’t.” Another potential explanation for the observation was given by Alan Kostelecky at Indiana University, who has devoted his career to violations of the limiting speed of light. He proposed in 1985 that an energy field that lies unseen in the vacuum might explain the finding. The field allows neutrinos to move faster through space than photons, the particles that make up light. “It may very well be that neutrinos travel faster than light does in that medium. It is not at all unreasonable that that would be the case.” Professor Dave Wark, leader of the UK group on the T2K neutrino experiment in Japan, cautioned that scientists would “require a very high standard of proof and confirmation from other neutrino experiments around the world”. Susan Cartwright, senior lecturer in particle astrophysics at Sheffield University, said there were many potential sources of error in the Opera experiment. “The sort of thing you might worry about is have they correctly accounted for the time delay of actually reading out the signals? Whatever you are using as a timing signal, that has to travel down the cables to your computer and when you are talking about nanoseconds, you have to know exactly how quickly the current travels, and it is not instantaneous.” Cartwright works on T2K, which sends neutrinos over a 295km distance. “We could certainly check this, but MINOS [the neutrino experiment at Fermilab in the US] are in a better position because we are still doing repairs after the earthquake that struck Japan.” Professor Jenny Thomas of University College London, and a spokesperson for the MINOS neutrino experiment, said if the discovery was proved correct, it “would overturn everything we thought we understood about relativity and the speed of light”. Ereditato said the Opera team was going through a mix of feelings. “There is excitement, adrenaline, because you feel you have hit something hot. Another feeling is exhaustion. A third feeling is let’s look again and again and think of other checks we have not yet done.” Particle physics Physics Ian Sample Alok Jha guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

When I think of nurses, I think of caring. I think of hard-working people who, despite being spread increasingly thin, do so much for the patients under their care and get relatively little in return. That’s why I love California Nurses Association and National Nurses United. They not only demand reasonable concessions on patient care , they also demonstrate in favor of public policies like a Wall Street transaction tax . Yesteday thousands of their members walked picket lines, joined rallies and sent a message to employers that RNs will not accept reductions in patient services: At a boisterous rally at Sutter Alta Bates Thursday morning, AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka praised the RNs as “the last line of defense for patients” and excoriated the corporate assault by Sutter. “ They disrespect you by attacking your healthcare, your retirement benefits, your right to advocate for patients, and now they want to force you to work when you are sick. Having sick nurses care for sick patients is sick.” Trumka said it was 23,000 nurses taking a stand, but that they were joined by “millions of patients” and had the support of working people across the country. “When nurses are on the outside, there’s something wrong on the inside,” said CNA Co-President DeAnn McEwen at the rally. She called the sweeping concession demands by Sutter “drastic, unwarranted, and unconscionable. They’re harming patients and we’re standing in the gap.” “Nurses will never be silenced in standing up for our patients and our communities, or our members and our families,” says Children’s Oakland RN Martha Kuhl.

Continue reading …
Perry Does a Palin Impersonation with Fumbled Debate Answer

Click here to view this media There were tons of softball questions at the third GOP debate in 15 days on Thursday. “Do you think Obama is a socialist?” was t-balled (er tea-balled) for Mitt Romney by Megyn Kelly. When it’s a Fox News “debate” is more of a two hour showcase for Republican mythology (i.e. tax cuts solve everything). Where are the tough questions? That’s too mainstream for Fox. One wet kiss went to Rick Perry on health care in his state. Texas has the highest rate of uninsured in the nation. It ranks dead last. And Perry being the state’s three-time governor, strangely, has blamed the federal government for his states problems vying for a job on the federal level so he can fix (wait for it) Texas’ problems. (But they’re not really problems because people are moving to Texas.) Chris Wallace’s question to Perry was, “So the question is, isn’t Texas’ uninsured problem because of decisions made by Texas?” Now if Perry were smart (he isn’t) he’d be able to (ahem) parry this question into something awesome about Texas. Like: “Chris, in Texas we love freedom.” And POW the crowd would cheer like it’s execution number 3 34! But he didn’t. Perry’s answer: “Well, I disagree with your analysis there, because we’ve had a request in for the federal government so that we could have a Medicaid waiver for years. And the federal government has stopped us from having that Medicaid waiver. Allowing the state of Texas, or for that matter the other states that we’re making reference to here, that have waivers give them more options to be able to give the options, there’s a menu of options that we could have, just like Jon Huntsman talked about. That is how we go forward with our health care.” Huh? ” That have waivers give them more options to be able to give the options, there’s a menu of options that we could have ?” Hear that? That’s the sound of a poll numbers sinking for the A&M D-student in the race. Full transcript of the video after the jump. WALLACE: Governor Perry, I now have a question for you. Texas has the most uninsured residents of any state in the country, 25 percent. In the last debate, you blamed it on restrictions imposed by the federal government. But we checked about that, sir, in fact the feds treat Texas like they do all the other big states. On its own, on its own, Texas has imposed some of the toughest eligibility rules for Medicaid of any state in the country. In fact, you rank 49th in Medicaid coverage of low income residents. So the question is, isn’t Texas’ uninsured problem because of decisions made by Texas? PERRY: Well, I disagree with your analysis there, because we’ve had a request in for the federal government so that we could have a Medicaid waiver for years. And the federal government has stopped us from having that Medicaid waiver. Allowing the state of Texas, or for that matter the other states that we’re making reference to here, that have waivers give them more options to be able to give the options, there’s a menu of options that we could have, just like Jon Huntsman talked about. That is how we go forward with our health care. Each state deciding how they’re going to deliver that health care. Not one size fits all. And I think this whole concept of not allowing the states to come up with the best ideas about how to deliver health care in their state. And the fact is, people continue to move to the state of Texas. Some of the highest rates in the country, because we’ve created a state where opportunity is very much the word of the day there, if you will, for finding work and what have you. And our health care is part of that. Our education is part of that. And we are proud of what we put together in the state of Texas.

Continue reading …
Met to be asked to investigate Jade Goody phone-hacking claims

It is understood Mishcon de Reya lawyer asked to to go to the Met with allegations made by Goody’s mother The Metropolitan police are to be asked to investigate allegations that reality TV star Jade Goody’s phone was hacked while she was dying of cancer. It is understood Charlotte Harris, the Mishcon de Reya lawyer representing several phone-hacking claimants, has been asked to represent her and to go to the Met with the allegations made by Goody’s mother, Jackiey Budden. Budden believes both her and her daughter’s phones were hacked, but did nothing about it until July this year when she read about murder victim Milly Dowler’s phone messages being intercepted by the News of the World. She could not understand how journalists were getting hold of information and, when she read the Dowler story, believed it could have been through phone-hacking. “She [Jackiey] will be going to the police. She believes her phone was hacked by the News of the World, and Jade’s. Jade told me ‘I’m convinced my phone is being hacked’,” said Max Clifford, who handled Goody’s PR after she was diagnosed with cervical cancer in August 2008. “Jade had said to me on many occasions that someone had been bugging her phone because of stuff that was coming out in the papers. She would say, ‘I’ve had these conversations and there’s no way any of these people would have revealed them’,” added Clifford. “This was all while she was ill. I think it’s absolutely disgusting.” Clifford said Goody was convinced calls she made to her mother in August 2008 from the Big Brother set in India to tell her she had cancer had been hacked. “She said to me ‘I think my phone is being bugged’,” he added. The PR man, who settled his own News of the World phone-hacking action for more than £1m last year, said the former Big Brother contestant was an obvious target – in the months between being diagnosed and her death in March 2009, there was “a feeding frenzy” and “immense interest” in getting exclusives about her personal life. If the allegations against the News of the World are substantiated, it would increase the duration of the now defunct News International title’s allegedly illegal activities. Up to now the News of the World has been implicated in phone-hacking allegations up to mid 2006 when Glenn Mulcaire, the phone investigator who formally worked for the title, was arrested. Mishcon de Reya said it “could not confirm” whether or not it had been instructed by Budden. News International declined to comment, but a spokeswoman said the company continued to cooperate fully with police investigation. Goody lived the last seven years of her life in the spotlight, with every twist and turn documented or exposed in the tabloids from her first appearance in Channel 4′s Big Brother in 2002, when she was branded “Miss Piggy” by the tabloids, to the day she died. Her on-off relationship with the father of her two children, a miscarriage, and then her cancer were all covered in minute detail by the tabloids, with 140 stories alone featuring Goody in the News of the World between diagnosis and her death seven months later. But she also regularly co-operated with the now defunct News International paper in “buy-ups” – deals in which she would talk about her life in exchange for payment. In a separate development on Friday, the actress Sienna Miller revealed that she accused her mother, her sister and her former boyfriend Jude Law of selling stories about her to the press because she could not understand how journalists were getting information about her private life. “I changed my mobile number three times in three months. There were clicks on the line. I would pick up the phone and it would drop, there were messages I would never get, coupled with articles [containing private information] coming out every week. “So I started to do tests. I would leave messages on people’s phones, like we’re going to rent this house or whatever, and it would appear next day in the papers,” she told the Independent . • To contact the MediaGuardian news desk email editor@mediaguardian.co.uk or phone 020 3353 3857. For all other inquiries please call the main Guardian switchboard on 020 3353 2000. If you are writing a comment for publication, please mark clearly “for publication”. • To get the latest media news to your desktop or mobile, follow MediaGuardian on Twitter and Facebook Phone hacking News of the World National newspapers Newspapers Jade Goody James Robinson Lisa O’Carroll guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …