On Monday, ADM Mike Mullen told a crowd at the National Defense University that he was concerned about the civil-military “disconnect” – that the military was in danger of being out of touch with the American public, who appears disinterested in defense affairs. This recent op-ed in the Wall Street Journal made me wonder if Mullen (and other military leaders) are aware of just how much that “disconnect” is self-induced. In this op-ed,
Continue reading …In the world of advertising, celebrity always equals money, and anything that these luminaries—whether from entertainment, sports or even politics—touch (even by accident) is tantamount to tangible, profitable product placement, right? Related Entries January 13, 2011 White House Mum on Palin’s Latest Words January 13, 2011 WikiLeaks Exposes the Danger of Pakistan’s Nukes
Continue reading …Click here to view this media As President Obama was giving his speech in Tucson last night, I was headed to a TV studio, where I had a debate with the NRO’s Cliff May about the speech as well as the state of political discourse in our nation. I had checked my twitter feed 20 seconds before I went on air live to get a feel of the atmosphere out there and immediately I saw both right and left voices for the most part praised it. I then conveyed that to Al-Jazeera English’s audience. [The debate I had with Cliff May was fun and although it wasn't the setting for a raucous discussion, I had to cut him off after he tried to equate the left with the vitriol and violence of the right that last few years. When I began making my points that the right has been way out of line and off the wall, May said that he had gotten so many death threats he needed bodyguards. This is Cliff May I'm talking about and I bet most readers don't even remember his disgraceful behavior during the Valerie Plame affair . He then started to get nervous when I began to list all the violence that had taken place since Obama was elected, including the Richard Poplawski shooting of three police officers , and he tried to cut me off.] Back to the speech. When the President talked about Gabby opening her eyes and young Christina Green’s youthful outlook on public service, it was quite moving. It was a great speech — his best since he became President — and I hope it does some healing in Arizona and makes people start behaving differently. They know who they are, but I’m not confident that it will have the desired effect we’d wish. I think the constant cheering by the audience was a way to work out their grief and sadness and to deal with the tragedy; if ever a crowd needed something to cheer about, this was it. John Boehner not showing up was very weird . He’s Majority Leader now and should at least act like one. There were so many that made the trip and he stayed behind to go to an RNC function. Wow. Fox News had on Brit Hume, Charles Krauthammer and Chris Wallace after the speech to dissect it, and although they thought it was rather long and the cheering made them uneasy, they all thought the President did a wonderful job. Wallace was insistent that while the speech was good, it won’t have any lasting effect because the Republicans take control next week, but Krauthammer told the FOX panel that they shouldn’t minimize the positive and lasting effect the speech will have on the American people. Sometimes he can make some astute observations when he wants to. On the flip side, Rachel Maddow gave a very good analysis of the speech as she went through it piece by piece. Later on MSNBC had on Tom Brokaw, who is now their grand poobah and he also enjoyed the speech and tried to attach a historical perspective to it — and then blasted Sarah Palin for her bizarre whining video. David Frum came on later and basically said her popularity after that video is like an iceberg melting on all sides. She blew her chance at rising above any petty complaint she had and tarnished her sinking image immeasurably. (I didn’t get a chance to check out CNN.)
Continue reading …According to Good Morning America's George Stephanopoulos, conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh has ” a man-crush ” on New Jersey's Chris Christie. The GMA host interviewed the governor on Thursday and hit the Republican on not cutting unemployment fast enough and on his handling of December's blizzard. Regarding the state of New Jersey's turnaround, Stephanopoulos touted the talking points of the state's Democrats: “But some of your critics, some of the top Democrats in the state, say that your priorities are misplaced. One counted the number of the times you used jobs in the speech. Said it was four.” After being told by Christie that the level had come down almost a full point (from ten to 9.2) since taking office, the former Democratic operative turned journalist reminded, “Still above nine percent.” The host followed-up with his remark about Rush Limbaugh. As a back-door way of discussing 2012, Stephanopoulos joked, “Finally, Rush Limbaugh has something of a man-crush on you. He and many others are trying to get you into the presidential race.” Adopting a standard political cliche, he reminded, “Tip O'Neill said all politics is local. You came in for some criticism after the post-Christmas blizzard, including from former mayor of New York, Rudy Giuliani.” Christie was then forced to watch a clip of Giuliani critiquing him. Finally, the anchor continued the journalistic attack on Sarah Palin and her use of the word blood libel. “You think she knew what she was getting into with that,” Stephanopoulos wondered, A transcript of the January 13 segment, which aired at 7:43am EST, follows: GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: Will the tragedy in Tucson usher in the era of civility President Obama called for last night? How will both parties get back to the business of facing our common challenges? Here to take on those questions this morning, one of the rising stars of the Republican Party, New Jersey Governor Chris Christie. Thanks for coming in this morning. CHRIS CHRISTIE: Thank you, George. STEPHANOPOULOS: So, did the President strike the right cords last night? CHRISTIE: Yes. He did. STEPHANOPOULOS: What did you think of his speech? CHRISTIE: I thought it was excellent. I thought he did exactly what you want a leader to do at a moment like this, which is to remind us of the things that we have in common. Remind us of the things that unite us rather than divide us. And try not to play politics at all. The President hit all those things last night. So, I was really happy to see what he did. STEPHANOPOULOS: You're out there all the time with your constituents. I know you're doing another town hall meeting. Is this something that you expected- Does it feel like this is a moment for the entire country? CHRISTIE: Yeah. I think, listen, I think we have to be reflective. I think we should be having this kind of reflection on a daily basis. This is not an unusual period of vitriol in our country. In politics, you look back, we can say almost every presidential campaign that you've seen, high levels of vitriol and anger and things that people probably didn't deserve to have being said about them. I think we have to constantly be examining ourselves for ourselves how we act as a civilize society. Doesn't mean we can't disagree. Of course we can disagree, but we should be looking at this all the time. Not just have a tragedy spur us to do it. We need to treat each other with some level of civility, even when we disagree with each other. STEPHANOPOULOS: Meanwhile, Sarah Palin coming for some criticism today after using that term blood libel. You think she knew what she was getting into with that? CHRISTIE: I don't know. I have no idea. But, what I would say is I I don't think anybody really believes that Governor Palin was trying to make someone get hurt or bring violence on. And I think she should have said that and left it at that. STEPHANOPOULOS: Let's move on to your own State of the State. You were giving a big speech this week, as well. In your speech, you took credit for turning New Jersey around from being a basket case. But some of your critics, some of the top Democrats in the state, say that your priorities are misplaced. One counted the number of the times you used jobs in the speech. Said it was four. Your response? CHRISTIE: Because we're creating jobs, not talking about it. When I came into office, unemployment was ten percent in New Jersey. We're still too high. We're at 9.2 percent, but we're down almost a full point in a year and we're below the national average now. Last month in November, one- STEPHANOPOULOS: Still above nine percent . CHRISTIE: Yeah, I said- I said, we're not good enough. And I didn't say we turned it around. What I said in the speech is, State of the State is improving. Getting better every day. And last month, in November, the last month we have for jobs in New Jersey, one of every five private-sector jobs created in America was created in New Jersey. So, our policies are helping to create jobs where the private sector wants to grow again. You can talk all you want about jobs. It's about creating them and putting people back to work. STEPHANOPOULOS: One of our big issues is education reform. The former chancellor of the D.C. schools, Michelle Rhee was in the audience, watching your speech. The President has also hit those themes of educational reform a lot. Is this an issue, where Republicans and Democrats can find common ground? CHRISTIE: Absolutely. Absolutely. Michelle Rhee is a Democrat. I had Mayor Cory Booker of Newark in the audience, as well. We're working on reforming the Newark public schools, together, with Mark Zuckerberg from Facebook and the challenge grant he's given to the city of Newark. And I've said from the time of the campaign when I running in 2009 that President Obama and I agree on this issue. Agree much more than he did with my predecessor on the issues of real education reform. This is the transformational issue that can also bring both parties together, if we just rise above the interests, the special interests that want to protect the failed status quo. STEPHANOPOULOS: Tip O'Neill said all politics is local. You came in for some criticism after the post-Christmas blizzard, including from former mayor of New York, Rudy Giuliani. RUDY GIULIANI: If he asked me my advice? I would have said, “They elected you governor, they got in an emergency. They expect you to be there. You have to be there if you're a governor, a mayor or even a president, if it's important enough.” STEPHANOPOULOS: He said you shouldn't have been at Disney World. CHRISTIE: Listen, I know you find it shocking that two, strong-willed Italian guys from the north east will disagree on something. I have great respect for the mayor. We disagree on this one. But, we agree on so many more issues that Mayor Giuliani and I, two former U.S. attorneys will disagree on things at times on things. This is one that we do. STEPHANOPOULOS: Finally, Rush Limbaugh has something of a man-crush on you. [Christie laughs.] He and many others are trying to get you into the Presidential race. You've said time and time again you're not running. I take you at your word. But try to encapsulate what you think the Republican Party needs, who they need to nominate, what kind of a person in 2012. CHRISTIE: We need to nominate someone who the american people believe walk the walk, not just talk the talk, on reducing the size of government and bringing our tax structure and our spending, most importantly, under control. And that person has to prove they're willing to do the difficult things, not just talk about them. Because they've heard plenty of talk, especially from our party. I said this fall, we were campaigning for Republican candidates around the country. This is the Republican Party's last chance. It's put up or shut up time for us now that we won the House. We better do what we said we were going to do, or we're going to be sent into the wilderness without a compass for a long time and we're going to deserve it. Because we've talked about it, now let's do it. — Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center. Click here to follow him on Twitter .
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Well, they say that paranoia is an indicator of oncoming senility, but that would mean Rush Limbaugh has been getting senile for the past twenty years. In any event, he was in prime form yesterday : This is not an isolated event. Every time something like this happens, some disaster, it doesn’t take 30 minutes for the media to start speculating that it’s talk radio, and now Fox News and the blogs on the right and everything else. I got a lot of people who sent me e-mails yesterday: “Rush, I thought you were a little bit over the top yesterday when you said the Democrat Party profits from murder, wants to profit.” How else can I say this? Try to put yourself in my shoes and I want you to try to do this outside of the normal give-and-take and ebb-and-flow of the daily hardball that is politics. Here we have a deranged, obviously mentally insane young man who has fired on and killed a number of people, wounded others. On Saturday, I was in my home watching NFL football. I happened to be alone. I hadn’t been to Tucson, Arizona, in 20 years and all of a sudden I read it’s my fault, and I’m hearing people say it’s my fault and that it’s inspired by me and what I do. I want you to put yourself in my shoes. And then more and more powerful political people start standing up and making that claim, including the chief law enforcement official for that county, Clarence Dupnik, a law enforcement official who has the ability to influence jury pools. … Now, I ask you, you all know that I am a political enemy of these people. These are the people that keep talking about limiting speech with the Fairness Doctrine. The other day Al Sharpton goes to the FCC to want hearings on me to get them to curb what I can say. He came out of there claiming the FCC’s interested in holding these hearings. Look, I’m not telling you people anything you don’t know. You know that there are constant assaults on the existence of this program. There are constant serious political efforts made to terminate this program and all of talk radio, Fox News and what have you. So we have this incident, and now I have to sit here and just let it roll off my back that I’m responsible for this. Anything I say is overreacting to it. Next: The black helicopters are coming to take him away! Isn’t creeping paranoia also a sign of a guilty consicence? Whoda thunk?
Continue reading …The New York Times’s lead political blogger Michael Shear was predictably effusive toward Obama’s “soft and restrained” Wednesday night address to the nation, while showing resentment toward Palin’s “accusatory” Wednesday morning video defense of herself: “ Obama and Palin, a Tale of Two Speeches .” The very premise of Shear’s Thursday morning posting was fatally flawed: Comparing the speech of a sitting president to a former vice presidential candidate attacked for inciting the shooting, yet expecting each to offer the same message in the same tone. Wednesday was bookended by two remarkable — and remarkably different — political performances that demonstrated the vast expanse of America’s political landscape. The day opened at 5 a.m. with Sarah Palin, whose seven-and-a-half minute video statement captured with precision the bubbling anger and resentment that is an undercurrent of the national conversation about our public discourse. It ended with President Obama, whose plea for civility, love and compassion — for us to all be not just better citizens but better people — exposed for the first time the emotions of a leader who has spent two years staying cool and controlled for a nation beset by difficult times. …. Whether Ms. Palin chooses to challenge Mr. Obama or not, her video reflected the urgent feelings of her supporters. And Mr. Obama’s speech, delivered amid sorrow, offered a fresh glimpse of the candidate who used hope as the tool to inspire his. …. But the purpose of Ms. Palin’s video was clearly to send a different, more sharp-edged message . Just 1 minute and 32 seconds into her talk, Ms. Palin shifted gears, saying she had become puzzled and saddened by the accusations leveled against her and others by “journalists and pundits.” Shear admitted the actual messages of the speeches were not so different, but found Palin “accusatory” where Obama had offered a “plea for civility, love and compassion.” As if Palin should have been merely meek and mild after being blamed for inciting violence by the media and liberal commentators for three days running. But what could not have been more different was the tone. Where Ms. Palin was direct and forceful, Mr. Obama was soft and restrained. Where Ms. Palin was accusatory, Mr. Obama appeared to go out of his way to avoid pointing fingers or assigning blame . Where she stressed the importance of fighting for our different beliefs, he emphasized our need for unity, referring to the “American family — 300 million strong.” Shear positioned Obama as national healer without giving Palin any credit for staking out a free speech position or a strong defense of herself in the face of liberal and media smears. Instead, Mr. Obama echoed the calls for greater civility and fresh reflection about the nature of public discourse. But he did so while urging all sides to abandon what he called “the usual plane of politics and point scoring and pettiness that drifts away in the next news cycle.” He is likely to be disappointed. Even as he spoke, Twitter messages and emails flew across the internet, with one side assailing the other. And Ms. Palin will likely find little hope in the barrage of criticism that greeted her video. But Shear’s elaborate balancing act omits the reality that almost all conservatives reacted with anguish to the shooting, while liberal commentators were casting blame on the right from the start.
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Apparently Chris Matthews doesn’t follow any of Media Matters reporting or what David Neiwert and others have been documenting here at Crooks and Liars for some time now since he appeared to be completely unaware that there have been numerous assassination attempts where the perpetrators were fans of Glenn Beck. Heaven forbid that might entail some time… you know… reading and researching a bit instead of talking over his guests or repeating the latest Villager common wisdom talking points of the day. During a discussion about Sarah Palin’s latest attempt to feign victim-hood to deflect criticism of her crosshairs map, Media Matters’ David Brock pointed out to Matthews that yes, words do sometimes have real world consequences when it comes to riling up mentally unstable people who take to heart the type of eliminationist rhetoric we’ve seen from the likes of Palin and others, and in these cases, Glenn Beck. BROCK: But this is not street theater, as you know. Glenn Beck himself has been responsible for three thwarted assassination attempts this year. And Sarah Palin — (CROSSTALK) MATTHEWS: How is he responsible for them? BROCK: Well, you want to know what they are? MATTHEWS: You said it. BROCK: Sure. So, he burned Nancy Pelosi in effigy on his set. He tried to poison her with a chalice. OK. Some three weeks later, somebody tried to firebomb Nancy Pelosi`s house. That guy`s mother went on television and said he gets all his ideas from FOX News. Do you know about Senator Patty Murray and the death threat that she got? MATTHEWS: No. Go ahead. BROCK: OK. It`s recorded. The guy says after the health care vote, he says, you have a target on your back and I can accomplish what I want to accomplish with one bullet. He`s tried, convicted, and in the sentencing phase, his cousin writes in for leniency and she describes in a very chilling memo — it`s on our Web site — that he was slowly drawn into Glenn Beck`s world. And she portrays the guy, the attempted assassin, Charlie Wilson, as a victim of Beck. And, number three, which you probably do know about, this liberal foundation in San Francisco was targeted by a gunman, Byron Williams, in June. The shooter gave jailhouse interviews — and we published them — and he says Glenn Beck is a schoolteacher on television and points to specific episodes of the Glenn Becks show that inspired him to do it. MATTHEWS: Oh, God. Maybe someone can ask Chris Matthews or his staff to spend a little time taking a look at Media Matters site before he has another one of their contributors on as a guest again. Full transcript here .
Continue reading …If the president, or anyone in Obama’s close advisory circles, has an opinion about Sarah Palin’s latest rhetorical creation—her already infamous “blood libel” zinger—the world will have to do without that information for the time being. During an exchange with the press Thursday, White House spokesman Robert Gibbs owned that he had watched Palin make her statement but purposefully left Obama out of that discussion.
Continue reading …Rep. Gabrielle Giffords continues to amaze her doctors with her recovery from the brain injury she sustained in Saturday’s shooting. On Thursday, the word “miracle” was once again invoked as her medical team reported her progress, announcing that she had opened her eyes and was communicating through gestures.
Continue reading …The Teabaggers are a bunch of white cranks who really are nostalgic for the “good” old days, huh. For people who are so careful about denying any racism in their ranks, I’d say that fighting for segregation doesn’t do much to convince people otherwise: Tea party groups have succeeded in reversing nationally praised school integration policies in Raleigh, North Carolina, decrying the longstanding system as one of social engineering. The Washington Post reports that tea party pressure has motivated Wake County School District’s largely Republican school board to abolish policies the newspaper describes as “one of the nation’s most celebrated integration efforts.” “Say no to the social engineers!” was one of their slogans. The Post hails the existing system as a “rarity,” noting that some of the county’s “best, most diverse schools are in the poorest sections of this capital city. And its suburban schools, rather than being exclusive enclaves, include children whose parents cannot afford a house in the neighborhood.” The school board is instead considering a system in which poor children are relegated to low-income neighborhood schools, moving away from its current policies where most schools have students from a wide range of socioeconomic backgrounds. Critics have sharply denounced the new plans as a form of segregation, noting that poorer children are often minorities and arguing that the new tea party-backed ideas will lead to a new cycle of poverty for the less fortunate. Chief among them is the NAACP, which has slammed the effort as discriminatory and a new type of racial segregation, and has filed a civil rights complaint in an effort to protect hundreds of students from having to transfer out of their schools. “So far, all the chatter we heard from tea partyers has not manifested in actually putting in place retrograde policies,” NAACP president Ben Jealous told the Post. “But this is one place where they have literally attempted to turn back the clock.”
Continue reading …