Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 1896)
SNL Digital Short: Andy Samberg and Pee-wee Herman Get Drunk and Attack Anderson Cooper

Click here to view this media An SNL Digital Short — Andy Samberg and Pee-wee Herman get into a bit of trouble during a drunken night on the town.

Continue reading …
Pawlenty: Federal Government Should Not Raise the Debt Ceiling

Click here to view this media More irresponsible talk out of one of our likely Republican presidential candidates. Touting His Government Shutdown In 2005, Pawlenty Says GOP Lawmakers ‘Should Not Raise The Debt Ceiling’ : Former Governor and likely GOP 2012 presidential candidate Tim Pawlenty (MN), however, readily prescribed this economic kamikaze mission to the GOP today on Fox News Sunday. Pawlenty, whose failure to sign a state budget in 2005 forced 9,000 state employees to stop pubic services for nine days, told host Chris Wallace that GOP lawmakers “should not raise the debt ceiling” and should “take it one step further” by somehow “sequencing the pain of the bill” to prevent default While Pawlenty heralds his 2005 shutdown as a way to force reduced spending, Wallace pointed out that he only ended the shutdown because he “blinked” by raising taxes, specifically a tax on cigarette packs which Pawlenty preferred to call “a health impact fee.” Admitting to the tax hike, Pawlenty said his tenure was still “transformational” in reforming spending and believes he “should’ve let the shutdown run longer” to secure more of his agenda. An agenda, Wallace notes, that will leave the state’s deficit even further in the hole. Despite the devastating effect Pawlenty’s advice would have, at least 11 Republican lawmakers are signing on to freeze the debt limit and at least seven are prepared to shutdown the government to do so. Still, a slew of others are readily threatening to vote against the debt ceiling unless specific, often regressive cuts are made. Joining Sens. Rand Paul (R-KY) and Graham , Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK) reiterated that stance today on NBC’s Meet The Press. Insisting that the U.S. credit rating is threatened more by debt than by default, Coburn said he will not vote to raise the debt ceiling unless spending cuts are made. Transcript via Lexis Nexis below the fold. WALLACE: Joining us now to discuss his political future is the former Republican governor of Minnesota, likely presidential candidate, and author of a new book, “Courage to Stand.” Tim Pawlenty. And Governor, welcome back to Fox News Sunday. PAWLENTY: Great to be with you, Chris. WALLACE: Back in 2005, you allowed the government of Minnesota to shut down for nine days because of a disagreement with the Democratic legislature about taxes and spending. WALLACE: Should congressional Republicans take the same tough stance when it comes to raising the debt limit and federal spending? PAWLENTY: Well, what I’ve learned, Chris, after eight years of doing in a very liberal place — I love my state, but it’s liberal in terms of spending and government — is you’ve got to draw some lines in the sands. Chris Christie was just talking about it here a minute ago. It doesn’t mean you always have to go do — you know, have ultimate battle, but you’ve got to be willing to stand up to a culture, to a history, to a pattern — in this case, 21 percent spending in my state for 40 years — and say we’re not doing that anymore. And I’m glad we had that showdown in Minnesota. And as to the federal government, they should not raise the debt ceiling. I believe they should pass legislation, allow them to sequence the spending as the revenues come in to make sure they don’t default, and then have the debate about what other spending can be reduced. WALLACE: But you would say to the Republicans up in that building behind me do not raise the debt limit? PAWLENTY: That’s right. And, in fact, to avoid the default, I would take it one step further, send the president a piece of legislation that authorizes the federal government to sequence the pain of its bills so that we don’t default on the debt obligation and then have the debate about how we reduce the other spending. WALLACE: OK. I want to go back to 2005, though, because this is your — your time in the crucible, if you will. Back then, you ended the shutdown by agreeing to a 75-cent per pack cigarette tax. You called it a — a health impact fee. Governor, didn’t you blink? PAWLENTY: Well, if you look at what I’ve done in Minnesota, all this stuff that the country’s talking about, that the Republican — WALLACE: No, but I’m asking you about that specific stuff. PAWLENTY: Well, we had a compromise, and I picked the one that — one thing that was least harmful to economic growth of the options that we had in front of with us a Democrat legislature. You know, I never had a Republican legislature in my state. And so, yes, we had a 75 percent — a 75-cent pack increase on cigarette fees. But you look at my record overall, it was transformational in terms of reducing spending, reducing taxes, performance pay for teachers, not just talking about the other cuts for example and pension reform but actually doing it, the leading example in the country on the reforming public employee pensions and much more. WALLACE: Well, let me — let me pick up on that because the fact is, you — I mean, I’ve looked at your record. You were a budget hawk. As governor, you reduced the annual increase in spending from 21 percent a year to two percent a year. You issued 299 vetoes. But, as you left office this year, your successor as governor of Minnesota faced a $6 billion deficit, which is a third more than you inherited. PAWLENTY: Well, a couple of things. Forty-eight or 49 of the 50 states have an upcoming deficit, so this is not unique to Minnesota. And, number two, that deficit, projected for the upcoming two years, Chris, assumes a 27 percent increase in state spending. That is preposterous. It is irresponsible. It is reckless. And so, I don’t buy the notion, the premise underneath that that spending should or can go up 27 percent. WALLACE: But — but, I mean, is it — what does it say about it, that you were — went all out to try to cut spending, issued the vetoes and the deficit — I mean, you can talk about the projections, but it certainly hasn’t gone down, and may go up. PAWLENTY: Well, what it does say is in Minnesota and many other states, you got to have a budgeting process that doesn’t have spending on autopilot. So that’s why we have the deficit in our state, there’s a bunch of spending that’s on autopilot. That autopilot feature has to be shut off, and the idea that they’re going to have a 27 percent increase in state spending, I would say, is a flawed premise to begin with. And that’s why we called for budgeting reform in our state as well. But I want to leave you with this point, or make this point. All of the things that the country is facing that — that you talk about on this show and many others, on spending, on taxes, on pensions, on school reform, we did in Minnesota. There’s only four governors in the country that got an “A” from the tough grading Cato Institute, and I’m one of them. I’m the only one in the north half of the country, by the way.

Continue reading …
Liasson: Palin admitted political discourse can cause violence

Click here to view this media Fox News contributor Mara Liasson said Sunday that while defending use of gun imagery, Fox News employee Sarah Palin actually admitted that political discourse can cause violence. Following a shooting in Tucson, Arizona that left six dead and Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-AZ) in the hospital, Sarah Palin attacked critics who said that her political advertisement that put gun sights over Giffords’ district had had created a dangerous environment for the congresswoman. Palin defended herself by saying, “Especially within hours of a tragedy unfolding, journalists and pundits should not manufacture a blood libel that serves only to incite the very hatred and violence they purport to condemn. That is reprehensible.” The term “blood libel” was historically used as an excuse to persecute Jews. “Here she is saying, when you talk about blood libel, that is the definition political discourse, a manufactured lie causing violence,” noted Liasson. “In this case she paints herself as the potential victim.” “Here she is agreeing with the left that political discourse can cause violence.” Fox News pundit Brit Hume attempted to disagree but Liasson stood her ground. “Yes, that’s exactly what blood libel is. You make up a lie about someone, you make a false accusation that causes violence against Jews, for instance,” she said. “All I’m saying is that it struck the wrong tone on a whole lot of levels.” Fox News pundit and notorious neoconservative Bill Kristol also thought Palin made a mistake with her video but he employed his own violent metaphor while making his point. “If you want to be a presidential candidate then you should let other people answer your critics and you should deal with things a sort of a presidential level and it wasn’t necessary for her to defend herself,” he said. “Probably one of the things you should do — either when you are governor or running for president — is that you should pick your fights a little more carefully and what is the expression?” “You don’t shoot down. She shouldn’t be fighting with Chris Matthews, Keith Olbermann or Paul Krugman.” “I hope I didn’t incite anyone to shoot down,” he added.

Continue reading …

This is sort of like Christmas , isn’t it? This is the subversive beauty of whistleblowing: Even the mighty can be laid low when they least expect it. Get the popcorn! The offshore bank account details of 2,000 “high net worth individuals” and corporations – detailing massive potential tax evasion – will be handed over to the WikiLeaks organisation in London tomorrow by the most important and boldest whistleblower in Swiss banking history, Rudolf Elmer, two days before he goes on trial in his native Switzerland. British and American individuals and companies are among the offshore clients whose details will be contained on CDs presented to WikiLeaks at the Frontline Club in London. Those involved include, Elmer tells the Observer, “approximately 40 politicians”. Elmer, who after his press conference will return to Switzerland from exile in Mauritius to face trial, is a former chief operating officer in the Cayman Islands and employee of the powerful Julius Baer bank, which accuses him of stealing the information. He is also – at a time when the activities of banks are a matter of public concern – one of a small band of employees and executives seeking to blow the whistle on what they see as unprofessional, immoral and even potentially criminal activity by powerful international financial institutions. Along with the City of London and Wall Street, Switzerland is a fortress of banking and financial services, but famously secretive and expert in the concealment of wealth from all over the world for tax evasion and other extra-legal purposes. Elmer says he is releasing the information “in order to educate society”. The list includes “high net worth individuals”, multinational conglomerates and financial institutions – hedge funds”. They are said to be “using secrecy as a screen to hide behind in order to avoid paying tax”. They come from the US, Britain, Germany, Austria and Asia – “from all over”. Clients include “business people, politicians, people who have made their living in the arts and multinational conglomerates – from both sides of the Atlantic”. Elmer says: “Well-known pillars of society will hold investment portfolios and may include houses, trading companies, artwork, yachts, jewellery, horses, and so on.” “What I am objecting to is not one particular bank, but a system of structures,” he told the Observer. “I have worked for major banks other than Julius Baer, and the one thing on which I am absolutely clear is that the banks know, and the big boys know, that money is being secreted away for tax-evasion purposes, and other things such as money-laundering – although these cases involve tax evasion.” Elmer says: “I agree with privacy in banking for the person in the street, and legitimate activity, but in these instances privacy is being abused so that big people can get big banking organisations to service them. The normal, hard-working taxpayer is being abused also.”

Continue reading …
Diplomats Tour Iranian Nuclear Sites

Iran has invited the world – sans the U.S. – to come and tour several of its nuclear sites. Diplomats from other countries did visit the sites in what Iran says was an effort of goodwill and transparency. Chian, Russia, and the European Union refused the invitation. —JCL The BBC: A group of foreign diplomats is touring some of Iran’s nuclear sites, as Tehran seeks to build support for its controversial nuclear programme. Iran said it was a gesture of goodwill and transparency, but the US was not invited – while China, Russia and the EU refused the invitation. Tehran said its uranium enrichment programme was progressing “strongly”. It was responding to US claims that the programme was being hit by international sanctions. Read more Related Entries January 4, 2011 Gag Me With a Banker January 3, 2011 The Information Technology Roller Coaster

Continue reading …
A Bloody 24 Hours in Afghanistan

17 Afghan civilians have been killed in only a 24-hour span, as homemade bomb devices likely intended for U.S. soldiers and Afghan police detonated against civilians in a day fraught with explosions. —JCL The LA Times: Roadside bombs killed at least 17 Afghan civilians in a 24-hour span, including nine people — a child among them — whose vehicle was torn apart by a powerful blast on Sunday as they were on their way to a wedding in northern Afghanistan. Civilians are dying in record numbers as the war in Afghanistan grinds into its 10th year, and crude but powerful homemade bombs are the greatest hazard facing them. Insurgents plant the devices with the aim of killing Western troops, but more often it is noncombatants who are left dead or maimed. The wedding guests, all members of the same extended family, were killed when their station wagon hit a bomb outside Pul-e-Khumri, the capital of Baghlan province, north of Kabul, provincial authorities said. Baghlan, along with a wide swath of northern territory, has become far more dangerous over the last year as the Taliban insurgency pushes outward from its traditional strongholds in the south and east. Read more Related Entries January 4, 2011 Gag Me With a Banker January 3, 2011 The Information Technology Roller Coaster

Continue reading …
Tom Coburn: The ‘Bond Vigilantes’ Are More Dangerous Than Not Raising Debt Ceiling

Click here to view this media Why do Republicans insist on using this sort of language when trying to scare the crap out of everyone about a problem they created? “Bond vigilantes” Tom Coburn… really? This is nothing but an excuse to starve the beast and get rid of every social program that Republicans have hated for decades now. Rather than raise taxes on the rich, they’ll use this as an excuse to go after Social Security or other programs that help ordinary working people. Chuck Schumer laid out pretty plainly the dangers of not raising the debt ceiling this spring. He also talked about Eric Cantor admitting that it was going to have to be done. So if the Democrats give in to the Republicans on this, I agree with what Dibgy wrote the other day, it’s because they want to and not because they have to. GREGORY: All right, final question here about– what Eric Cantor in the House, a Republican leader, called a “leverage moment” for the Republicans on the debt ceiling. SCHUMER: Yeah. GREGORY: It has to be raised. We have to keep borrowing money, even though we’re so deep in debt. Republicans, Senator Schumer, to exact a promise on a certain amount of spending cuts before they vote to raise that ceiling. Do you think that agreement can be reached? SCHUMER: Well first, I think using the threat of not renewing the debt ceiling is like playing with fire. If we didn’t renew the debt ceiling, our soldiers and veterans wouldn’t be paid, Social Security checks wouldn’t go out, and worst of all, we might permanently threaten confidence– of the credit markets and the dollar, which could create a recession worse than the one we have now, or even a depression. So that is playing with fire. And I was glad to see that both Speaker Boehner and Eric Cantor said they’re not gonna use that as a threat. We have– are gonna have to come together on spending. There is no question about it. And we Democrats agree there oughta be spending cuts. And the appropriation that came up last year– late last year, the McCaskill-Sessions Proposal, bipartisan, to cut spending considerably lower– than was originally proposed in the budget– GREGORY: Right. SCHUMER: –was supported. But you can’t just do it willy nilly across the board. There are some things that changed since 2008 and need to be funded. GREGORY: Senator Coburn, does it have to be a specific amount– in cuts before you vote to raise the ceiling? COBURN: I think for me it does. I’ve had conversations with the President. Look– the debt ceiling, we had warnings last week from the rating agencies that we’re gonna get a downgrade in our bonds. A debt ceiling non-increase– is nothing compared to what’s gonna happen to us if we don’t address the real issues facing our country. The CBS poll out this morning, 77 percent of the people in this country believe we need to cut the spending significantly. Only nine percent– say we need to raise taxes. The fact is, is I believe the President and the– bipartisan majority in both houses know that we can come together before the debt ceiling and– reach an agreement that says, “Here’s where we’re gonna be and– here’s what we must do to send the signal to the international financial community.” If, in fact, we don’t raise the debt ceiling, that won’t be near the catastrophe that, if, in fact, the– the– the bond vigilantes come after the U.S. government bonds in the next two to three years– COBURN: –we will have such bigger pain than not raising the debt limit. GREGORY: I will let– make that the last word. Senators, thank you both very much.

Continue reading …
Southern Sudan Poised to Secede

After a weeklong referendum ended Saturday, early results show that voters in southern Sudan have overwhelmingly decided to secede from their northern neighbors, a move that will split the African country in two. The vote comes five years after the end of a two-decade civil war between the north and south in which hundreds of thousands of people were killed. —JCL The Associated Press: Southern Sudan’s president on Sunday offered a prayer of forgiveness for northern Sudan and the killings that occurred during a two-decade civil war, as the first results from a weeklong independence referendum showed an overwhelming vote for secession. Exhausted poll workers who counted ballots overnight and deep into Sunday morning posted returns at individual stations, and an Associated Press count of a small sample showed a 96 percent vote for secession. Sudan’s south ended its independence vote Saturday, a vote most believe will split the large country in two at the divide between Sudan’s Muslim north and Christian and animist south. The two sides ended a more than two decade civil war in 2005 in a peace deal that provided for last week’s vote. Read more Related Entries January 4, 2011 Gag Me With a Banker January 3, 2011 The Information Technology Roller Coaster

Continue reading …