Click here to view this media As Steve Benen pointed out, Joe Lieberman proved he can get foreign policy and feminism wrong at the same time on Morning Joe today: Gail Collins noted this morning the Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) has “reached a point in his public career when every single thing he does, including talking about his grandparents, is irritating.” That’s true, but some things are clearly more irritating than others. Take this morning , for example. During an appearance on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” today, Senator Joe Lieberman (I-Conn) continued to insist that Saddam Hussein was developing weapons of mass destruction even though none were ever found after the invasion of Iraq. The senator, retiring his seat in 2012, also said that despite the enormous cost to the U.S. in blood, prestige and treasure he does not regret his vote for war and would do it all over again. This was an astounding appearance. Lieberman insisted the “most official and comprehensive report” proved Saddam Hussein was developing WMD, and that the regime was “beginning really tactically to support the terrorist movements that had attacked us on 9/11 and today.” None of this is connected to reality in any substantive way. Every available shred of evidence makes clear that Saddam’s regime had nothing to do with al Qaeda, and for Lieberman to still be suggesting otherwise is disgraceful. For that matter, the notion that even the most confused observer would still believe that Iraq was developing WMD, and that this somehow justifies the invasion, is breathtaking. As part of the same MSNBC segment, Arianna Huffington asked Lieberman to substantiate his claim about Saddam Hussein was working on weapons of mass destruction, a claim even George W. Bush abandoned. The senator replied, “I’m basing it on the so-called Duelfer Report. Charles D-U-E-L-F-E-R conducted the most comprehensive report on behalf of our government.” When Huffington said there’s nothing in the Duelfer Report to bolster Lieberman’s conclusions, the senator replied, “I don’t think you’ve read it, sweetheart.” I find it nothing short of remarkable that a United States senator in 2011 would be so condescending as to call a woman “sweetheart” on national television. In context, Huffington was calling Lieberman out on his transparent falsehoods, which no doubt irritated him, but frankly, I don’t care what the context was. Huffington deserves an apology. Agreed. And as Steve and the Huffington Post pointed out as well, Lieberman doesn’t know what he’s talking about — Joe Lieberman Insists Iraq Was Developing WMDs Despite No Evidence . And good for her for saying this to Lieberman’s face: HUFFINGTON: Well, based on this completely unfounded assumption, I sincerely hope for the sake of the country that you do not become Secretary of Defense. Amen sister.
Continue reading …Is David Gregory trying to raise his profile by becoming more overtly partisan? Gregory struck what at one point seemed to me a hostile tone in his questioning of conservative Sen. Tom Coburn on last week's Meet The Press.
Continue reading …By Barry Lando There’s a certain irony in the fact that as one bloody, corrupt dictator headed off to ignominious exile, thousands of miles away another returned. Related Entries January 19, 2011 JFK’s Eloquence, 50 Years Later January 18, 2011 What It Was Like to Be John F. Kennedy
Continue reading …By David Sirota As “Buy China” policies now economically supercharge the world’s most populous nation, the White House and congressional Republicans have opposed many of the very “Buy America” proposals that might help us keep up—and that obstruction has come at a steep price. Related Entries January 21, 2011 It’s Repeal That’s Ailing January 20, 2011 Obama’s New Chief of Staff Makes $8.3 Million From Wall Street Gig
Continue reading …By Eugene Robinson This whole health care thing isn’t quite working out the way Republicans planned. My guess is that they’ll soon try to change the subject—but I’m afraid they’re already in too deep. Related Entries January 21, 2011 It’s Repeal That’s Ailing January 20, 2011 Obama’s New Chief of Staff Makes $8.3 Million From Wall Street Gig
Continue reading …BLANK By Robert Scheer If you missed our live video chat, in which Robert Scheer discussed with readers his latest column, “Obama Pulls a Clinton,” or you just want to relive the excitement, you can read the full transcript here.
Continue reading …In the guise of a status report on ObamaCare, Katie Couric on Thursday night derided Republican efforts to repeal it just as it’s “starting to kick in.” She pleaded for viewers to give it a chance as she rationalized “the law is vulnerable because of the complex way it tries to fold 30 million uninsured people into the system,” fretting “ damage could be inflicted by choking off funding for programs that support the law, but a greater threat is the legal storm that's brewing.” Her only expert, Dr. Atul Gawande , touted ObamaCare as “a toolbox.” Couric disingenuously described Gawande as merely “a surgeon at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston and an influential voice on health care policy.” In fact, Gawande, who toiled on Gary Hart’s 1984 presidential bid and then for Al Gore’s quest in 1988 before working in Bill Clinton’s 1992 effort, oversaw a team of 75 toiling on the Clinton administration’s health care task force in 1993-94. Last year, he penned a piece for The New Yorker , “ Watching the Health-Care Vote ,” on how he brought his “fourteen-year-old son to see the vote on health reform” since it meant “hope has arrived.” Gawande revealed: “I realized I was — for just this one day — jealous of the politicians swirling in and out of the chambers,” because: [T]hey were going to take a final up or down vote on whether to embrace the principle in our country that if you are in medical need, you should be able to get quality health care without bankrupting yourself. And I was jealous of those who got to step onto the House floor, slide their identification cards into the electronic voting boxes, and, either way the tally went, make history. The bill was not remotely the kind of socialist, government take over of medicine its opponents accused it of being… The CBS Evening News story ended with Gawande’s assurance of ObamaCare’s potential if not ruined by opponents: “I have no question that we will discover ways that can control costs, improve quality of care for people. Whether we're going to take those lessons depends entirely on politics, and that's scary. That's the reality.” (The CBSNews.com online version also failed to identify Gawande’s political work and belief in ObamaCare.) Couric began by deriding the GOP/Tea Party agenda: “A move by House Republicans to repeal the law is going nowhere. Even so, they passed a resolution today directing House committees to get to work on new health reform legislation.” After one reporter expressed despair at how many supposedly can’t afford health care, another CBS reporter benignly explained how HHS is now formulating a huge regulatory regime: “The job of implementing health care reform belongs to HHS, the Department of Health and Human Services, and they have an entire new division now to do that.” Citing a poll, Couric relayed how “just 13 percent say they have seen any benefit, even though,” Couric stressed, “the most vulnerable are now protected.” But, she told viewers in pleading for them to give the law time, “it will take six more years to phase in all 91 of the law's major components.” Couric soon worried “the law is vulnerable because of the complex way it tries to fold 30 million uninsured people into the system while getting a handle on costs. By 2019,” she seriously asserted, “the law is expected to save the economy $143 billion.” Reporter Nancy Cordes described the GOP strategy: “One congressional expert that I spoke to put it this way: He said, ‘They're not going to be able to kill this bill. The best they can do right now is a series of flesh wounds.’” To which, Couric flailed: “That damage could be inflicted by choking off funding for programs that support the law, but a greater threat is the legal storm that's brewing.” “Threat,” not “opportunity.” From the Thursday, January 20 CBS Evening News , transcript provided by the MRC’s Brad Wilmouth: KATIE COURIC: And about the hot issue in Congress this week, 40 percent of Americans say the health care reform law should be repealed. That's down from 45 percent in November. A move by House Republicans to repeal the law is going nowhere. Even so, they passed a resolution today directing House committees to get to work on new health reform legislation. The vote was 253-175, with 14 Democrats joining the majority. In the meantime, the reform plan the President signed into law last year is starting to kick in. Where do things stand? Tonight we put that “In Focus.”
Continue reading …enlarge LBJ – ushering in the Great Society. Click here to view this media Having won a landslide victory in the 1964 Presidential election, Lyndon Johnson was riding the crest of a very popular wave, and despite persistent and ominous signs from Vietnam, The Great Society was ready and poised to take center stage – at least for a while . And so his State of The Union on that January 4, 1965 was a message filled with promise, promises and optimism. President Johnson: “Most Americans enjoy a good life. But far too many are still trapped in poverty and idleness and fear. Let a just nation throw open to them the city of promise: –to the elderly, by providing hospital care under social security and by raising benefit payments to those struggling to maintain the dignity of their later years; –to the poor and the unfortunate, through doubling the war against poverty this year; –to Negro Americans, through enforcement of the civil rights law and elimination of barriers to the right to vote; –to those in other lands that are seeking the promise of America, through an immigration law based on the work a man can do and not where he was born or how he spells his name.” There was Medicare, Medicaid and The War on Poverty. The Civil Rights Bill was signed in June and LBJ’s popularity continued. But as successful as he was with Domestic policy, his Achilles Heel came in the area of Foreign Policy. Vietnam would eventually take over and as domestic programs were being implemented, the draft would suck most of the life out of the country in a very short time. But in January 1965 no one was really thinking about that.
Continue reading …Only Alabama’s newly installed Governor Robert Bentley knows for sure whether he was sincere on Wednesday when he apologized for saying, just last weekend, that non-Christians weren’t his brothers and sisters, but it was evident that he had learned … Related Entries January 11, 2011 The Story of a Lifetime January 6, 2011 Two Injured in Maryland Mail Blasts
Continue reading …