Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 1875)
Brit Hume Doesn’t Think There Will be Any Blowback for Making Changes to Social Security

Click here to view this media To hell with what those polls say, Brit Hume doesn’t think there will be any or only minor blowback for any politician that proposes making cuts to Social Security and hopes the President brings it up in his State of the Union Address. Heaven forbid Hume didn’t have the same hopes for the cuts to military spending that those same polls show the public does favor. WALLACE: I want to pick up on what you just said about the fact that people don’t want their spending cut. There was a very interesting poll in “The New York Times” this week which showed people absolutely, in general, favor cutting spending, just not in areas that directly affect them. People were asked which would they be willing to cut? Twenty-one percent said Medicare. Thirteen percent said Social Security. Fifty- five percent said the military. And when asked about changes to Social Security, 18 percent backed raising the retirement age, eight percent chose cutting benefits in the future, 66 percent said cut benefits for those with higher incomes. HUME: I think, Chris, the problem with some of this polling is that it carries the suggestion that those who are currently receiving benefits, Medicare and Social Security, would see those benefits reduced. In fact, however, nearly all the plans that I’ve heard in advance to try to rein in the spending on those program deals with future retirees and future benefits — (CROSSTALK) WALLACE: But this question in The Times — HUME: I saw that. WALLACE: Let me finish. This question in The Times talked about cutting benefits for future retirees, not for current retirees. HUME: I understand. But nearly everybody voting on it — I mean, that includes the whole pool of potential — was it all adults? I don’t remember whether it was, or whether it was registered voters or whoever. WALLACE: No, it was all adults. HUME: Yes, all adults. Well, a poll of all adults I don’t think are terribly useful. And I will tell you this — you talk to anybody under the age of 50 these days about Social Security and Medicare; particularly Social Security, and whether they’re going to get their benefits, they virtually all expect they won’t see anything. So, are they ready for some reduced benefit? I think they are. And I think if you do that, raise the retirement age, reduce the benefits for those who are not yet receiving them, that will pass. And the political blowback will be very minor indeed. WALLACE: Juan, what do you make of that? I mean, I’m struck that 55 percent said don’t cut Medicare, don’t cut Social Security. They want to cut the military. WILLIAMS: Well, you know, I appreciate Brit’s position. He’s saying, look, there is a way out of the forest here, people can come to some common ground. I think you’re going to hear some of that logic from President Obama on Tuesday. But the fact is that when you put these things on the table and you say to people there are going to be cuts involved, guess what? The seniors say don’t touch it. They don’t believe that you’re not going to cut it. I mean, that’s exactly the fear. HUME: I know, but if you do it, and they still get their benefits, they’ll believe it then. WILLIAMS: And that’s exactly the fear tactic that Republicans played on in talking about death panels and all — (CROSSTALK) WALLACE: Let Mara in here. LIASSON: Yes, there is a problem, that Republicans are now on record saying that not one hair on Medicare’s head should be touched. That was their position in health care. However, if there was real bipartisan leadership, and the deficit commission laid out the path to this, and if President Obama and Senator Coburn and Jim DeMint wanted to get together and try do this, there is a way to do this. WALLACE: All right. We’re going to leave it there for now.

Continue reading …
Without Obama, We Lost So Much More Than an Election

By Bill Boyarsky The selfish negativity expressed by Republicans in the House health care debate last week showed why we should fight hard for President Barack Obama’s re-election in 2012. Related Entries January 24, 2011 Where Liberals Go to Feel Good January 23, 2011 How Obama Can Define Moderation

Continue reading …
Where Liberals Go to Feel Good

By Chris Hedges The Liberal Class’ solution to the bleak political landscape is the conference, where liberals go to feel good about themselves again. Forget about reclaiming and reelecting President Obama—worry about resisting him. Related Entries January 24, 2011 Where Liberals Go to Feel Good January 23, 2011 How Obama Can Define Moderation

Continue reading …
Continue reading …
Shuster:  "There Is A False Equivalency" Between Olbermann And Fox Rhetoric — Beck Has "Inspired" Acts Of Violence

Click here to view this media You can expect Bill O’Reilly to go nuts with the news that Olbermann left MSNBC since the news broke on Friday. On Reliable Sources, David Zurawik, Jane Hall and David Shuster discussed what had happened and of course the narrative that Olbermann is just as bad as the FOX talkers was presented by Zurawik whoeven went as far as calling him Joe McCarthy . OLBERMANN: If Glenn Beck, who obsesses nearly as strangely as this Mr. Loughner did about gold and debt, and who wistfully joked about killing Michael Moore, and Bill O’Reilly, who blithely repeated “Tiller the Killer” until the phrase was burned into the minds of his viewers, if they do not begin their next broadcasts with solemn apologies for ever turning to the death fantasies and the dreams of bloodlust, for ever having provided just the oxygen to those deep in madness to whom violence is an acceptable solution, than those commentators and the others must be repudiated by their viewers and listens, but all politicians, and repudiated by the sponsors and by the networks that employ them. (END VIDEO CLIP) KURTZ: Olbermann had great passion. Television likes that. But he also often made it personal. In fact, you were “The Worst Person in the World” I think on a couple of occasions. ZURAWIK: More than once, yes. That, to me, Howie, is typical of his recklessness and his character assassination. That’s why I said he wanted to be Edward R. Murrow and he was more McCarthy than Murrow because — SHUSTER: Oh, come on, David. SHUSTER: There’s a false equivalency that you and other folks make between Keith Olbermann and Glenn Beck, and it’s not fair. ZURAWIK: David, let him finish. Let’s finish. This isn’t one of your MSNBC shows. KURTZ: I’m going to let you respond in just a moment. Finish your point. ZURAWIK: I think that he will absolutely attack people and try to assassinate their character just the way Joe McCarthy did without facts. And to say that Bill O’Reilly, who has been much more reasonable in the last year than Keith Olbermann ever was on the air, much more responsible, to try to pin that on Bill O’Reilly, link him to that, is outrageous, Howie. SHUSTER: Look, the fact of the matter is, is there are people who have tried to carry out acts of violence who were inspired by Glenn Beck. That is not — KURTZ: Wait a minute. Bill O’Reilly — (CROSSTALK) SHUSTER: The fact of the matter is you’re making a moral equivalency between Glenn Beck and Keith Olbermann, and it’s simply not fair. ZURAWIK: I’m not making — SHUSTER: And the fact of the matter is, when people say that — ZURAWIK: I’m not making a moral equivalency. SHUSTER: — MSNBC is the liberal antidote to Fox News, and that there’s an equal balance there, that’s simply not true. David Shuster beat him back for good reason. Zurawik has been the recipient of Olbermann’s Worst Persons award (See his response here ) previously and you have to ask yourself if this is one reason he applied the McCarthy tag to him. David Neiwert called him out also for his bogus ‘fascism’ argument. I found more stupid stuff he wrote online and wrote this : Click here to view this media David Neiwert posted about David Zurawik’s frothy appearance with Howard Kurtz last weekend as he bashed MSNBC. On ‘Reliable Sources,’ David Zurawik decries heated cable talk by shrieking about MSNBC’s ‘fascism’ Zurawik felt compelled to explain himself in a little more detail online . As you can see from the video, I am harder on MSNBC than Fox, because this NBC sister channel has outrageously decided it doesn’t have to cover news on weekends and holidays — and yet, still calls itself a news channel.I have to admit, it is a great business model: Don’t cover the news. let someone fulfill that expensive task. We’ll just put on ideologues like Keith Olbermann and Rachel Maddow and let them mock our opponents as we opine about the news that others like CNN went to trouble and expense of gathering and verifying. He’s upset because they choose to run some of those Locked Up episodes during the weekend, really? Here’s a little info for Z: MSNBC does cover the news on the weekends, they just don’t do it 24/7. He should probably check their schedule sometime before making the claim that they don’t cover the news on Saturday and Sunday. And WTF does that have to do with how they cover the news in general or if they are biased in their reporting? Which is worse, showing some non-news shows on the weekend, or pushing a political agenda 24 hours a day, seven days a week for as many years as they’ve been on the air? Olbermann is a big loss for the left in the sense that we’re without a strong voice to counter the wingnut intelligensia as we head to the 2012 general election and it will be all hands on deck, but at least the move probably made Tom Brokaw very happy.

Continue reading …
Cantor: We Need to Embrace Paul Ryan’s Roadmap

Click here to view this media (h/t Heather) Aw, isn’t it the sweetest? Eric Cantor insists on standing by his man, Paul Ryan, telling Meet the Press host David Gregory that the Republicans must “embrace” Ryan’s Roadmap for America . DAVID GREGORY: How about– and– and the irony– of Paul Ryan being introduced as the budget chairman– and he’s doing the response to the State of the Union. He is the one who’s proposed draconian– cuts to– REP. ERIC CANTOR: Right. DAVID GREGORY: –Social Security and to Medicare. DAVID GREGORY: And Republicans don’t stand behind him. REP. ERIC CANTOR: That’s not true. I just told you that– we put a chapter in our book about it because the direction in which the road map goes is something we need– we need to embrace. Actually, it *is* true and as Jon Perr writes, Cantor can’t hide his “Ryan eyes” : During the 2010 midterm elections, John Boehner’s ” GOP Pledge to America ” took those two popular programs off the table when it came to his now broken $100 billion budget cut promise . The much-hyped Republican Study Committee plan to slash $2.5 trillion in discretionary spending for Democratic priorities similarly includes what Boehner’s Pledge deemed “common-sense exceptions for seniors.” And throughout the fall campaign , the same Republican Party that tried to kill Medicare in the 1960′s and gut it in the 1990′s falsely accused Democrats wanting to cut benefits to 46 million American elderly. Which is why Paul Ryan’s Roadmap for America makes the Republican leadership queasy. Because while most no doubt agree in principle with Ryan’s ” slash and privatize ” agenda, they are terrified of saying so on the record. In February, House Minority Leader John Boehner distanced himself from Ryan’s Roadmap, saying, “it’s his.” In July , Boehner grumbled, “There are parts of it that are well done,” adding, “Other parts I have some doubts about, in terms of how good the policy is.” And with good reason. With its draconian spending cuts, Medicare rationing, tax cuts for the rich and Social Security privatization, a GOP platform based on Ryan’s Roadmap would about as popular as the Ebola virus. As the Washington Post put it: Many Republican colleagues, who, even as they praise Ryan for his doggedness, privately consider the Roadmap a path to electoral disaster… The discomfort some Republicans feel for Ryan’s proposals goes beyond November. If Republicans were to take control of Congress next year, Ryan will rise to chairman of the Budget Committee. He could use the position to hold colleagues accountable for runaway budget deficits and make it more difficult for fellow Republicans — and Democrats — to stuff bills with expensive projects that add to the problem. Why is it that Republicans love to say that “everything is on the table” but the only thing that actually ever gets mentioned is the two most successful programs for the average American and cutting for those who can least afford it? Let’s be clear: Social Security is NOT an entitlement–it’s a trust. Nor will it ever be insolvent if the income cap is removed. That’s all it would take, but instead we have Republicans preaching austerity measures for senior citizens as if that would solve all our economic woes. Idiots . Every fair-minded analysis makes clear that Ryan’s roadmap is a right-wing fantasy , slashing taxes on the rich while raising taxes for everyone else . The plan calls for privatizing Social Security and gutting Medicare , and fails miserably in its intended goal — cutting the deficit. As Paul Krugman explained , the Ryan plan “is a fraud that makes no useful contribution to the debate over America’s fiscal future.” I really hope that the Republicans keep going along this track. The Republican voter is typically older and let’s see how much support they can count on when they go after Social Security and Medicare. DAVID GREGORY: Let’s talk about Social Security. A couple weeks ago– Majority Leader Reid in the Senate was on the program and I asked him about whether Social Security is in crisis. This is what he said. (VIDEO CLIP NOT TRANSCRIBED) DAVID GREGORY: If you disagree with Leader Reid are you prepared to raise the retirement age, means test, benefits or in– another way seriously tackle the entitlement of Social Security? REP. ERIC CANTOR: David, what we have said is we’ve got a serious fiscal train wreck coming for this country if we don’t deal with these entitlements. And so entitlements are something that we need to begin to work on. Now for me the first entitlement we need to deal with– is the healthcare bill. Is the Obamacare bill. DAVID GREGORY: We’ll get to healthcare. I asked you– REP. ERIC CANTOR: You know– DAVID GREGORY:–about Social Security now. REP. ERIC CANTOR: And– absolutely. And– and– and so we have got to– focus– on what we can do together. Now as you s– as– as that just indicated, the Senate is not willing to do anything under Harry Reid. DAVID GREGORY: What are you willing to do? Means test benefits? Raise the retirement age? REP. ERIC CANTOR: David, we’ve– we have a program that we have seen one of our members, Paul Ryan, the chairman of the budget committee, put together called the Road Map. And he and Kevin McCarthy and I wrote a book together. And in that book we reserved a chapter for discussion– about Social Security, about Medicare, and how we can begin to at least discuss DAVID GREGORY: Well, what are you for? REP. ERIC CANTOR: –to do that. DAVID GREGORY: Leader, I’m asking you what you’re for. REP. ERIC CANTOR: What– what– what I’m telling you we’re for is we’re for an active discussion to see what we can together– DAVID GREGORY: How– REP. ERIC CANTOR: –and do. DAVID GREGORY: –discussion Social Security and what is happening has been discussed for years. REP. ERIC CANTOR: Well– DAVID GREGORY: How about– and– and the irony– of Paul Ryan being introduced as the budget chairman– and he’s doing the response to the State of the Union. He is the one who’s proposed draconian– cuts to– REP. ERIC CANTOR: Right. DAVID GREGORY: –Social Security and to Medicare. DAVID GREGORY: And Republicans don’t stand behind him. REP. ERIC CANTOR: That’s not true. I just told you that– we put a chapter in our book about it because the direction in which the road map goes is something we need– we need to embrace. Now let me tell you this– DAVID GREGORY: Raise the retirement age? Means testing benefits? Those are the specifics. REP. ERIC CANTOR: The fundamental– the starting point in any plan has got to be we need to distinguish between those– at or nearing retirement. Anyone 55 and older in this country has got to know– that their Social Security benefits will not be addressed. Will not be changed. It is for all the younger people, the– those 54 and younger, we’re gonna have to have a serious discussion. Now with Harry Reid talking about the fact that he doesn’t wanna even discuss it, that’s not leadership.

Continue reading …
GOP senator says toning down violent rhetoric means ‘the shooter wins’

Click here to view this media Following the mass shooting in Tucson, Arizona that left six dead and Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (R-AZ) in the hospital, there have been calls for politicians and pundits to back off violent rhetoric. But tea party favorite Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) isn’t about to let the tragedy change his tone. Prior to the shooting, Republicans in the House introduced “The Repealing the Job-Killing Health-Care Law Act.” Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) used the phrase “job-killing” eight times in one briefing on Jan. 4. Most Republicans dialed back that rhetoric in the wake of the shooting. “Whether it’s job-killing, job-destroying, job-crushing, job-ending, job-eliminating, job-preventing, job-limiting, job-hurting, job-excising, job-removing, job-exterminating, or job-doingawaywith – the point is clear,” Cantor later said . In an interview broadcast on ABC Sunday, Lee refused to follow Cantor’s lead. “The shooter wins if we, who’ve been elected, change what we do just because of what he did,” Lee told ABC. And Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) may agree. Speaking to Fox News’ Chris Wallace Sunday about whether Republicans would force a shut down of the government if Democrats didn’t agree to deep spending cuts, McConnell used some violent imagery of his own. “Nobody is going to put a gun to anybody’s head here,” he said.

Continue reading …

Discretion Advised

No Comment

By Ruth Marcus Discretionary spending, the part of the federal budget that is not on autopilot and is subject to annual appropriations, generally constitutes less than 40 percent of federal spending. Take out defense spending and that share drops to well under 20 percent. Related Entries January 21, 2011 Orszag Sees Turbulent Times Ahead January 19, 2011 Suicides Double Among National Guard, Reserves

Continue reading …

Fake news by Andy Borowitz By Andy Borowitz In a memo, House Speaker John Boehner explained, “From now on, we will say that he was born nearish America, and perhaps even as close as Cuba.” Related Entries January 21, 2011 Orszag Sees Turbulent Times Ahead January 19, 2011 Suicides Double Among National Guard, Reserves

Continue reading …

Fake news by Andy Borowitz By Andy Borowitz In a moving White House ceremony today, President Hu Jintao of China presented U.S. President Barack Obama with a counterfeit DVD of the Hollywood blockbuster “Toy Story 3.” Related Entries January 21, 2011 Orszag Sees Turbulent Times Ahead January 19, 2011 Suicides Double Among National Guard, Reserves

Continue reading …