Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 1792)

In the decade since 9/11, the liberal media's patently false insistence that American Muslims were or would soon be the victims of a massive wave of hate crimes at least had the benefit of plausibility. The same can't be said of an effort to suggest that Islam can't get a fair shake in left-wing Hollywood. Yet a recent Associated Press article uncritically detailed an initiative of the Muslim Public Affairs Counsel to bring 'a more representative picture of Muslim-Americans on the screen.' MPAC has a Hollywood Bureau that lobbies network and studio executives to 'increase awareness of the diversity of American Muslims and to be a resource for writers and producers.' The problem, according to the article, is that in the entertainment industry, 'the Muslim-as-terrorist plot line has been an accepted story for years.' The article offers no examples to back up that assertion and with good reason – there's a serious shortage of them. Hollywood has in fact been extremely reluctant to paint anything but a positive portrayal of Muslims since 9/11. In the 2002 film adaptation of Tom Clancy's novel, 'The Sum of All Fears,' the villains from the book were changed from Islamist terrorists to neo-Nazis. Another film, 'The Stoning or Soraya M.' (2009), won multiple awards at international film festivals, but failed to get a single Oscar nomination. Based on a true event, the film exposes the corruption and cruelty of Sharia law as applied in a modern Iranian village. Even comedy stars Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert's October 'sanity' rally featured a performance from Yusuf Islam (formerly Cat Stevens). In 1989, Islam endorsed the fatwah against the life of novelist Salmon Rushdie for blaspheming Islam in his gook, 'The Satanic Verses.' Islam said that burning Rushdie in effigy wasn't as good as 'the real thing,' and that, if he knew where Rushdie was, Islam would betray him. 'The goal [of the Hollywood Bureau] is not to spoon-feed Hollywood Muslim-friendly story lines,' the article assured readers. But given the kid gloves with which TV and movies treat Islam anyway, it's hard to imagine the Hollywood Bureau having any other purpose. The idea that Muslims are maligned in the entertainment media is absurd. That the AP would help MPAC spread it, is sadly predictable.

Continue reading …
White House criticize Egyptian VP

Omar Suleiman, the Egyptian Vice president, has been criticized by the White House for making remarks about Egypt was ‘not ready for democracy’.

Continue reading …
Obama tells FOX to Stop "Spinning the News" as O’Reilly sez The Factor "isn’t Ideological"

Click here to view this media FOX’s pregame interview between Bill and the President was only a small portion of the overall interview and O’Reilly broadcast the rest of it on The Factor Monday night. I didn’t bother to count how many times BillO interrupted him, but Lawrence O’Donnell found he did maybe 42 to 43 interruptions during the SB telecast. Bill gets down to business tonight and asks President Obama what FNC could do better. No, really. O’Reilly: But you’re talking more like a professor. President Obama: No, no, but what I’m saying is that’s an example of just the facts without the spin I think would be good… O’Reilly:I think overall our guys do that but when you get over to the prime time opinion-makers that’s when you… President Obama: But the opinion makers is where you get a lot of where the viewership gravitates. O’Reilly: Absolutely, so you think you’re being treated fairly on FOX News now? President Obama: I would say that the news guys try to do a good job, although let’s face it, I think FOX News has a point of view. There’s nothing wrong with that… O’Reilly: Do you respect it? Absolutely. The Obama administration has heavily criticized FOX News before and so he had another chance to call them out for their propaganda. He chose a much softer approach this time, which is calculated at trying to win over some of their voters, as if that’s possible. Does his team really believe that it is? Because I sure do not. Maybe the Beltway bipartisan fetish that VandeHarris got honest about played a role in his answer. BillO, as usual, got impatient as Obama tried to give a thoughtful answer. He’s not used to a reasoned argument if it’s longer than thirty seconds and he’s not the one doing all the talking. Bill later read some of his emails as is his custom, and one of his viewers complained that Bill was shilling for Obama, painting him as a moderate and giving him free advertising..HAHA. See, Bill inserted that email to justify his non-ideological spin because he knows how to play the game too. Bill responded with his patented answer that “The Factor Is not and never has been, an ideological program.” “I ask the President questions, he responds and you decide. I don’t engineer anything. He asks Dick Morris the questions, Morris smears him and anything progressive for ten minutes and then you decide. He asks the questions, Karl Rove smears him and anything progressive for ten minutes and you decide. He asks Coulter the questions, she smears him and anything progressive … yada yada yada. He then brings on Juan Williams to give a Faux Liberal point of view just for kicks and it pays very well for Juan. I wonder when Bill will ever ask Sarah Palin how she feels about being hated by so many Americans. A) the next time she appears on The Factor. B) 6 months. C) When she announces her candidacy for President in 2012. D) Never I think it’s only fair. After all, Palin has much higher negatives than Obama — which means …? What say you, Bill? National Journal: Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin continues to be a highly polarizing figure, with a whopping 57 percent viewing her unfavorably according to a new poll. The Bloomberg survey , released Monday, also found that the negative feelings about Palin are particularly strong. A third — 33 percent — said they view Palin “very unfavorably.” That’s the same percentage that viewed her favorably cumulatively — respondents who either viewed her “somewhat” or “very” favorably (!). The survey results indicate that Palin faces a significant image problem as she decides to run for president. Just look at how Pres. Obama’s numbers compare. Obama scored a net negative job approval rating — 48 percent said they disapprove of his performance as president while 47 percent approved, which is in line with other polls and shows the Bloomberg survey isn’t a particularly good poll for the president. However, 52 percent view Obama favorably while 44 percent view him unfavorably. More troubling for Palin is that it may be tough for her to change that perception. Only 10 percent are unsure of their opinion of her. And in a NBC/WSJ poll, she fares even worse than Pelosi: Sarah Palin rates a couple of points lower than Nancy Pelosi according to an NBC/WSJ pol l (h/t Political Wire ).Palin’s negative rating has climbed to 50%. That’s the highest negative rating for anyone measured in this poll (and it’s two points lower than Nancy Pelosi’s negative rating from last month). And get this: The only major subgroups that Palin wins in a head-to-head match-up with Obama are Republicans, conservatives, and FOX viewers. That’s it, folks. NBC/WSJ co-pollster Bill McInturff (R) says that this is “a sobering starting point” for Palin if she decides to run for president.

Continue reading …
The WH criticize Egyptian VP

Omar Suleiman, the Egyptian Vice president, has been criticized by the White House for making remarks about Egypt was ‘not ready for democracy’.

Continue reading …
Egypt activist Wael Ghonim tells TV station: ‘I am no hero’ – video

Google executive Wael Ghonim’s emotional interview on the country’s privately owned Dream TV after his release was hailed as a landmark moment in the Egypt revolt. He played a key role in using the internet to spark the uprising against Hosni Mubarak

Continue reading …

So it seems that Israel and the U.S. decided in 2008 that Egypt’s torture chief is the man they’ve selected to replace Mubarak. Yes, I know there’s such a thing as balancing competing interests , but why is our political establishment so very comfortable with dictators and torturers? Am I supposed to be less morally outraged because it’s a Democratic administration moving the chess pieces? Mr Suleiman, who is widely tipped to take over from Hosni Mubarak as president, was named as Israel’s preferred candidate for the job after discussions with American officials in 2008. As a key figure working for Middle East peace, he once suggested that Israeli troops would be “welcome” to invade Egypt to stop weapons being smuggled to Hamas terrorists in neighbouring Gaza. The details, which emerged in secret files obtained by WikiLeaks and passed to The Daily Telegraph , come after Mr Suleiman began talks with opposition groups on the future for Egypt’s government. On Saturday, Mr Suleiman won the backing of Hillary Clinton, the US Secretary of State, to lead the “transition” to democracy after two weeks of demonstrations calling for President Mubarak to resign.David Cameron, the Prime Minister, spoke to Mr Suleiman yesterday and urged him to take “bold and credible steps” to show the world that Egypt is embarking on an “irreversible, urgent and real” transition. Leaked cables from American embassies in Cairo and Tel Aviv disclose the close co-operation between Mr Suleiman and the US and Israeli governments as well as diplomats’ intense interest in likely successors to the ageing President Mubarak, 83. The documents highlight the delicate position which the Egyptian government seeks to maintain in Middle East politics, as a leading Arab nation with a strong relationship with the US and Israel. By 2008, Mr Suleiman, who was head of the foreign intelligence service, had become Israel’s main point of contact in the Egyptian government. Let’s put this into perspective: There are some very serious allegations against Suleiman and they deserve more attention than they’re getting. From Dave Bry at The Awl: “The extraordinary rendition program landed some people in CIA black sites—and others were turned over for torture-by-proxy to other regimes. Egypt figured large as a torture destination of choice, as did Suleiman as Egypt’s torturer-in-chief. At least one person extraordinarily rendered by the CIA to Egypt — Egyptian-born Australian citizen Mamdouh Habib — was reportedly tortured by Suleiman himself. … In October 2001, Habib was seized from a bus by Pakistani security forces. While detained in Pakistan, at the behest of American agents, he was suspended from a hook and electrocuted repeatedly. He was then turned over to the CIA, and in the process of transporting him to Egypt he endured the usual treatment: his clothes were cut off, a suppository was stuffed in his anus, he was put into a diaper—and ‘wrapped up like a spring roll’. In Egypt, as Habib recounts in his memoir, My Story: The Tale of a Terrorist Who Wasn’t , he was repeatedly subjected to electric shocks, immersed in water up to his nostrils and beaten. His fingers were broken and he was hung from metal hooks. At one point, his interrogator slapped him so hard that his blindfold was dislodged, revealing the identity of his tormentor: Suleiman .” — Oh, no. At Al-Jazeera, UC Santa Barbara professor Lisa Hajjar writes an extremely damning of portrait of the spy man overseeing Egypt’s “transition” to democracy. I’d like to be more optimistic about this. But it’s awfully difficult .

Continue reading …
France’s prime minister spent family Christmas break as guest of Mubarak

Admission from François Fillon comes as French ministers’ links with unpopular Middle East regimes come under scrutiny The French prime minister, François Fillon, has admitted that he and his family spent their Christmas holiday as a guest of the Egyptian president, Hosni Mubarak. The admission came as Egypt’s president was grappling with widespread protests and calls for him to stand down, and as French ministers’ personal links with unpopular regimes in the region came under unprecedented scrutiny. Fillon is the second French cabinet minister forced to admit accepting the largesse of autocratic leaders in a fortnight. Foreign minister Michèle Alliot-Marie has faced calls to resign since it was discovered she had taken two flights in a private jet belonging to a Tunisian businessman during the country’s revolution. A statement from Fillon’s office said he flew to Aswan in Egypt with his Welsh-born wife Penelope and their children on 26 December at the invitation of the Egyptian authorities. They used a French plane reserved for government ministersfor reasons of security, and returned to Paris on 2 January. It said: “As it was a private visit his ticket and that of members of his family were billed to him personally at a price determined by the air force according to the rules applying to him and that are applied every time he makes a private visit.” While in Egypt he and his family travelled to visit the temple of Abu Simbel using an official Egyptian plane. “The prime minister was provided accommodation during his stay by the Egyptian authorities. The prime minister, also at the invitation of the Egyptian authorities, borrowed a plane from the Egyptian government fleet to go from Aswan to Abu Simbel where he visited the temple. “He also took a boat trip on the Nile under the same conditions”. Fillon met Mubarak on 30 December in Aswan. The statement, issued by Matignon, the prime minister’s office, said he was providing the information “because he was concerned about transparency”.Fillon had given his support to Alliot-Marie after she faced severe criticism over taking a holiday in Tunisia after the unrest, which led to the overthrow of President Zine al-Abidine Ben Ali, and for using a private jet belonging to the businessman Aziz Milad, who was said to have links with the regime. France Egypt Middle East Kim Willsher guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Wael Ghonim anointed voice of the revolution by Tahrir Square faithful

Google executive behind protest-supporting Facebook page cheered by crowds in Cairo after being released by police Wael Ghonim, the Google executive who helped organise the protests that started Egypt’s uprising, has been hailed as a hero and a symbol of hope amid calls for him to be appointed spokesman for the country’s democracy movement. Ghonim, a marketing manager and web activist who was lionised by demonstrators after he went missing on 27 January, confirmed in an emotional TV interview immediately after he was freed from detention on Monday that he was behind a Facebook page that galvanised protests by angry youth. Ghonim broke down and wept openly live on camera for Dream TV and his remarks were translated and quickly posted on Twitter to become what has been widely described as a rallying-point to keep the protests alive. Ghonim declined to comment on his Twitter page , saying he did not give interviews to foreign media. But by early Tuesday evening, 148,700 people had signed up to a Facebook campaign calling for him to be appointed the official spokesman of several protest groups. “I am not a hero. I only used the keyboard, the real heroes are the ones on the ground, those I can’t name,” Ghonim said in the interview, which ended with him being overcome with emotion as he was shown images of some of those who died in the two-week uprising. “Wael Ghonim is weeping for the martyrs of the Egyptian revolution,” one fan posted on his Facebook wall. Another admirer wrote: “The whole of Egypt is with you. May God protect you.” Meral Ezzeldien wrote: “Very soon our dreams will come true.” Ghonim got a thunderous welcome when he joined a massive demonstration in Tahrir Square on Tuesday, telling the crowd: “We will not abandon our demand and that is the departure of the regime. My condolences to the fathers and mothers who lost sons and daughters who died for their dream.” Ahmad Mustafa, protesting in the square, described how he had been moved by Ghonim. “I felt I could relate to him. He’s the same age as me, he’s pretty much the same background. I felt so connected to him, he portrayed me and the situation I’m in. Some of my friends who have not taken part in the demonstrations since they started are going to come today because of what they saw yesterday. It is has changed something in them. Sometimes you need some kind of spark to get you to go, and that’s good.” Mostafa Hussein, a 30-year-old activist who joined the protests, said: “It was a very emotional interview, and I think it will prove to be a historical one as well.” Others agreed. “He’s the most credible person in Egypt right now; he feels what we are all feeling,” claimed Reem El-Komi, a 25-year-old protester. Her companion, Menna, agreed. “This is my first day at the protests – the moment I saw Ghonim on TV last night I knew I had to get down to Tahrir and stand with the Egyptian people,” she said. Another Twitter message read: “My aunt called me crying after Ghonim’s interview saying ‘I’m going to Tahrir tomorrow! God Bless him! He made us proud!’ Twitter user Desert_Dals wrote: “Left breathless by Wael Ghonim. InshaAllah his sincerity & patriotism, beamed into Egypt’s living rooms, will ignite this revolution #Jan25″. Ghonim’s biography on his own Twitter account describes him as “Constantly Changing, Serious Joker, Internet Addict, Love challenging status quo!”. He confirmed that it was he who had set up the Faceboook page, We are all Khaled Said, named after the young Egyptian businessman whose death at the hands of police in June set off months of protests. The page became one of the main tools for organising the demonstrations that started the revolt in earnest. “I was blindfolded for 12 days, I couldn’t hear anything, I didn’t know what was happening,” he said in the interview, which has become a worldwide hit on the internet. Neither Google nor his family had any clue where he was and feared for his life. In detention he was not informed of events outside and interrogated over what the authorities believed were foreign powers behind the Facebook campaign and protests. When the interviewer told him about some of the 300 people who had died while he was incarcerated, he cried. “We didn’t do anything wrong. We did what our consciences dictated to us”, he said. Egypt Middle East Protest Google Facebook Ian Black guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Egyptians renew appeal for Mubarak to resign now on biggest day of protest

Hundreds of thousands of protesters pack Tahrir Square in Cairo and reject concessions on transfer of power in September Hundreds of thousands of Egyptians have rejected the government’s attempts to control the transition to free elections with the largest demonstration to date in Cairo, and renewed demands for President Mubarak’s immediate resignation. Vice-president Omar Suleiman, the former intelligence chief who is leading negotiations with Egyptian opposition groups, sought to appease the protesters with a televised assurance that Mubarak had endorsed a timetable for a “peaceful and organised transfer of power” in September. Suleiman said that Mubarak has set up a committee to recommend constitutional amendments to remove tight restrictions on who can run for president, and promised there will be no reprisals against the protesters. “The president welcomed the national consensus, confirming that we are putting our feet on the right path to getting out of the current crisis,” Suleiman said. But the consensus among the hundreds of thousands of demonstrators who packed into Cairo’s Tahrir Square on the 15th day of protest – discrediting government claims that support for the uprising is fading – was that Mubarak must go immediately and that the regime cannot be trusted. In Tahrir Square, the concessions were viewed as further evidence of the government’s weakness, and spurred a determination to keep up the protests. The demonstration drew significantly larger numbers of Egyptians who have not attended the protests before – including women, children and government workers – in a sign of the broadening base of support for the uprising. But some of the regime’s opponents said that they feared the scale of the continued defiance could again provoke a violent backlash by the regime. The UN estimates that 300 people have died in state-sponsored violence against the protesters. Among those who appeared in Tahrir Square was the newly-released Google executive and blogger Wael Ghonim , who was detained by state security for 12 days. He made an emotional TV appearance , which had a powerful impact in Egypt and on the web, and helped motivate some people to attend the protests, where he addressed the crowd. “You are the heroes. I am not a hero, you are the heroes,” Ghonim said in the TV interview. Thousands of the protesters began a sit-in on the road outside parliament, which the opposition has been threatening to take over since the beginning of the demonstrations. Opposition activists said Suleiman’s statement fell far short of their demands for Mubarak’s immediate departure, for parliament to be dissolved and for the installation of a broadly representative interim government. A leading member of the Muslim Brotherhood, Essam al-Arian, told the Guardian that his organisation would give Mubarak a week to resign and then reconsider its participation in negotiations with Suleiman, which began on Sunday. Amid concerns among some activists that the regime will drag out talks until the street protests fade, al-Arian denied that the Muslim Brotherhood is being used. “The Viet Cong was negotiating in Paris and fighting in Vietnam,” he said. “We give them [the regime] some time to discuss. They are afraid of facing Mubarak and saying to him: go. They are arranging their affairs because he was a symbol of the regime and he was controlling them. They need some time. We give them this chance. A week.” After that, al-Arian said, the Muslim Brotherhood will reconsider its participation in the negotiations. But al-Arian said that whatever happens, the protesters on the street will win. “I think the revolution cannot be defeated. It can achieve all goals in the end, it can achieve some. But it cannot be defeated,” he said. “It isn’t personal against Mr Mubarak himself, it is against what Mr Mubarak represents.” Asked if his organisation had only belatedly thrown its weight behind the street protests, al-Arian said the Muslim Brotherhood had not pushed itself to the forefront out of concern that it would be used against the demonstrators. “We are keeping a step behind, not in the forefront, because Mr Obama, Mrs Clinton, Mr Cameron, Mr Sarkozy, when they see us at the front they say we are another Khomeini, another Iranian [revolution],” he said. Among those who joined the demonstrations were staff from Cairo University, a former director of the state bank, and off-duty soldiers. A group of women chanted: “Mubarak, you were head of the air force. Fly out of here.” One of the protesters was dressed as a football referee and waved a red card with Mubarak’s name on it. Ayman Abdullah, a 43-year-old teacher, said he regards the square as liberated territory. “This is the first piece of the new Egypt. Mubarak does not rule here anymore. Suleiman does not rule here. We will rule here and will rule all of Egypt,” he said. Also in the crowd was the prominent Egyptian feminist author Nawal El-Saadawi, whose life has been threatened by Islamists, and who predicted that Mubarak will be gone within days. “What’s beautiful about this revolution is that it is a revolution, not what they’re calling a crisis … It’s a real, real revolution,” she said. “We have won. Mubarak is leaving. He is very stubborn and stupid, and blind to the power of the people. But he has lost power because there are millions. It’s not thousands … Nobody can abort the revolution.” The protest organisers have called another mass demonstration for Friday, when they plan to hold a symbolic trial of Mubarak. Mubarak also ordered an investigation into the assault by his supporters on opposition protesters last week that led to an estimated 300 deaths and mass detentions. “The youth of Egypt deserve national appreciation,” Suleiman quoted the president as saying. “They should not be detained, harassed or denied their freedom of expression.” However, there is scepticism among opposition activists given that thousands of them have been detained in recent days. Egypt Protest Middle East Chris McGreal guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
CBS ‘Early Show’ Touts Obama’s ‘Olive Branch’ to Business, Ignores Administration’s Expansion of Regulation

At the top of Tuesday's CBS Early Show, co-host Erica Hill cheered President Obama's supposedly pro-business move of speaking at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce on Monday: “Obama's olive branch. The President reaches out into hostile territory and meets with the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, urging the private sector to start hiring.” Introducing the later report on the speech, co-host Chris Wragge touted the event as Obama's continued “effort to make peace with big business,” despite the Chamber being “a group that he has battled ever since he took office.” Senior White House correspondent Bill Plante noted how “Mr. Obama pledged to work on lowering federal spending, revising the corporate tax code, and eliminating some federal regulations.” What the coverage failed to point out was that 43 major new regulations were imposed by the Obama administration in 2010. Interestingly, a report from congressional correspondent Nancy Cordes on Monday's CBS Evening News did feature criticism from the business community over excessive government regulation: “In nearly 2,000 pages of letters to Congress, U.S. businesses unloaded on everything from anti-pollution rules, to new pilot rest requirements, to workplace noise standards, complaining they all kill jobs.” Plante left those details out of his Early Show report. Cordes also featured sound bites of Republican members of Congress calling for less regulation, again something absent in Plante's coverage. What Plante did manage to include was Obama's attack on businesses for not spending enough of their profits on hiring new employees: “The President's message to business? It's time to put their mountain of extra cash to work.” Following Plante's report, Wragge spoke with business and economics correspondent Rebecca Jarvis and promoted the same criticism: “Now companies, they've done extremely well. They've cut a lot of jobs, as we've seen over the years, but their balance sheets are showing record profits. Wall Street's doing very well. So can a speech like this have any impact on these business leaders to go out and then hire more people?” While Plante and Wragge fretted over businesses not hiring enough, they seemed to forget that in early 2010, CBS News itself fired close to 100 staffers . No word yet on many of those people the network news organization has hired back with its own “mountain of cash” ($15 million per year of which goes to CBS Evening News anchor Katie Couric). Concluding his report, Plante argued that “as the President looks forward to his re-election campaign, dissension aside, he stands to benefit from any perceived move toward business – benefit with independents and Republicans.” Here is a full transcript of Plante's February 8 Early Show report: 7:00AM ET TEASE: ERICA HILL: Obama's olive branch. The President reaches out into hostile territory and meets with the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, urging the private sector to start hiring. But did Wall Street buy his message? We have reaction from big business. 7:02AM ET SEGMENT:

Continue reading …