Guardian photographer Sean Smith looks the tent city set up by protesters in Tahrir Square, Cairo
Continue reading …Jonathan Freedland has former Heat editor Sam Delaney and Guardian columnists Richard Williams and Miranda Sawyer in the studio for the latest Week in review podcast . Our section on great anticlimaxes in world history was consigned to the cutting room floor when Hosni Mubarak finally stood down as Egypt’s president. But before Mubarak’s “will-he-won’t-he” act, it was those nasty British bankers who dominated the news agenda. George Osborne’s much-heralded Project Merlin was meant to be the moment when the government finally backed up its rhetoric with decisive action on banks and the bonus culture. Was it any more than political hocus pocus? Also in the podcast, after Hollywood gave us a glimpse of politics past with Meryl Streep’s turn as Margaret Thatcher , we ask why it’s usually only American politicians that are deemed worthy of the big screen. Finally, we discuss Iain Duncan Smith’s assertion that Hello! magazine and the cult of celebrity is to blame for tarnishing the institution of marriage – and cranking up the cost of the average wedding to £20,000. Have a listen, and post your feedback below. Jonathan Freedland Ben Green Miranda Sawyer Sam Delaney Richard Williams
Continue reading …For years, torture has been described as an endemic problem in Egypt. Indeed international human rights groups say that the Egyptian government’s record on this issue is a huge part of what is motivating Egyptians to continue to participate in the demonstrations that have been sweeping the country for more than two weeks. And with allegations that the Egyptian army has been involved in the detention and torture of anti-government campaigners, we ask if the army is losing its reputation for neutrality and just how deep the culture of torture runs within the state’s security apparatus.
Continue reading …With Hosni Mubarak’s departure, the age of political reason is returning to Egypt and the wider Arab world A joyous night in Cairo. What bliss to be alive, to be an Egyptian and an Arab. In Tahrir Square they’re chanting, “Egypt is free” and “We won!” The removal of Mubarak alone (and getting the bulk of his $40bn loot back for the national treasury), without any other reforms, would itself be experienced in the region and in Egypt as a huge political triumph . It will set new forces into motion. A nation that has witnessed miracles of mass mobilisations and a huge rise in popular political consciousness will not be easy to crush, as Tunisia demonstrates. Arab history, despite appearances, is not static. Soon after the Israeli victory of 1967 that marked the defeat of secular Arab nationalism, one of the great Arab poets, Nizar Qabbani wrote: Arab children, Corn ears of the future, You will break our chains. Kill the opium in our heads, Kill the illusions. Arab children, Don’t read about our suffocated generation, We are a hopeless case, As worthless as a water-melon rind. Don’t read about us, Don’t ape us, Don’t accept us, Don’t accept our ideas, We are a nation of crooks and jugglers. Arab children, Spring rain, Corn ears of the future, You are the generation that will overcome defeat. How happy he would have been to seen his prophecy being fulfilled. The new wave of mass opposition has happened at a time where there are no radical nationalist parties in the Arab world, and this has dictated the tactics: huge assemblies in symbolic spaces posing an immediate challenge to authority – as if to say, we are showing our strength, we don’t want to test it because we neither organised for that nor are we prepared, but if you mow us down remember the world is watching. This dependence on global public opinion is moving, but is also a sign of weakness. Had Obama and the Pentagon ordered the Egyptian army to clear the square – however high the cost – the generals would have obeyed orders, but it would have been an extremely risky operation for them, if not for Obama. It could have split the high command from ordinary soldiers and junior officers, many of whose relatives and families are demonstrating and many of whom know and feel that the masses are on the right side. That would have meant a revolutionary upheaval of a sort that neither Washington nor the Muslim Brotherhood – the party of cold calculation – desired. The show of popular strength was enough to get rid of the current dictator. He’d only go if the US decided to take him away. After much wobbling, they did. They had no other serious option left. The victory, however, belongs to the Egyptian people whose unending courage and sacrifices made all this possible. And so it ended badly for Mubarak and his old henchman. Having unleashed security thugs only a fortnight ago, Vice-President Suleiman’s failure to dislodge the demonstrators from the square was one more nail in the coffin. The rising tide of the Egyptian masses with workers coming out on strike , judges demonstrating on the streets, and the threat of even larger crowds next week, made it impossible for Washington to hang on to Mubarak and his cronies. The man Hillary Clinton had referred to as a loyal friend, indeed “family”, was dumped. The US decided to cut its losses and authorised the military intervention. Omar Suleiman, an old western favourite, was selected as vice-president by Washington, endorsed by the EU, to supervise an “orderly transition” . Suleiman was always viewed by the people as a brutal and corrupt torturer, a man who not only gives orders, but participates in the process. A WikiLeaks document had a former US ambassador praising him for not being “squeamish”. The new vice president had warned the protesting crowds last Tuesday that if they did not demobilise themselves voluntarily, the army was standing by: a coup might be the only option left. It was, but against the dictator they had backed for 30 years. It was the only way to stabilise the country. There could be no return to “normality”. The age of political reason is returning to the Arab world. The people are fed up of being colonised and bullied. Meanwhile, the political temperature is rising in Jordan, Algeria and Yemen. Egypt Hosni Mubarak Middle East Tariq Ali guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …“AOL giving control to Arianna Huffington. How the mighty have fallen!” NewsBusters publisher Brent Bozell quipped on the February 10 edition of FNC's “Hannity.” “Ten years ago, AOL had 30 million members, they were joining forces with the Time-Warner colossus,” the Media Research Center founder noted. Now “they're down to 4 million members and they're at Motel 6 getting into bed with Arianna.” “It's a mess of an organization and they're going to make an even greater mess of it with Arianna. I promise you that,” Bozell told Hannity during the program's “Media Mash” segment. [Video, link to MP3 audio follow page break] [ MP3 audio ] Earlier in the segment, Hannity and Bozell discussed the media questioning former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld about if he feels remorse for not placing more troops inside Iraq earlier on in the conflict. “The same reporters did nothing but bash George Bush over the surge” Bozell reminded Hannity. “It's a fair question, they're just not the ones to be asking it,” the MRC president concluded.
Continue reading …Opposition protest blocks streets around pro-Mubarak symbol of power in bid to stop journalists inside ‘spreading more deception’ Egypt’s anti-government protesters have laid siege to the state television headquarters, surrounding army barricades and blocking access to the building. “These people are presenting an alternative reality; even as the country is swept by revolution, they remain inside telling lies,” said Samir Abbas, a 37-year-old former tour guide who had joined the crowds outside the Maspero building. “Just as the presidential palace is a symbol of regime power, so is Maspero. We will stay peaceful, but we won’t let their deception continue.” For the state media, the blockade is merely the latest chapter in a revolution that has brought out the best and the worst of the pro-government press. The state media has been accused of inciting violence against demonstrators by labelling them as foreign agents and refusing to air pro-reform views, yet in recent days hundreds of journalists working for loyalist newspapers have walked out on strike and state TV channels have been rocked by a series of high-profile resignations. “We see this in every revolution; state media employees see which way the wind is blowing and suddenly get a conscience,” said Lawrence Pintak, founding dean of the Edward R. Murrow College of Communication and an expert on the Arab media. “In Egypt though it’s part of a longer trend. In recent years, media power has been shifting from the old state mouthpieces to regional satellite channels, private Cairo-based TV stations and the nascent privately owned newspapers. That’s led to a tendency for even government-owned media outlets to begin pushing the envelope as well.” In the early days of Egypt’s anti-government uprising, state television channels refused to broadcast images of the ongoing occupation of Cairo’s Tahrir square, instead accusing an unlikely alliance of Israel, Hamas, the US and Iran of fomenting the unrest. When pro-Mubarak baltagiyya (thugs) began attacking demonstrators, killing some and leaving thousands injured, many anti-Mubarak activists held the information ministry and the state media apparatus responsible. With back-to-back coverage of pro-Mubarak protests dominating the state airwaves, it appeared the “Cairo spring” – a degree of media liberalisation that allowed a number of independent Egyptian outlets to flourish over the past five years – was being brought to an end. “The state media has acted as a tool of the security services to strike at the protests,” Gamal Fahmy, a senior member of the Journalists’ Syndicate, told local news outlet Ahram Online. According to Shahira Amin, deputy head of the state-run Nile TV channel and a senior state TV anchor, the moment protests erupted on 25 January Egypt’s government immediately began ramping up editorial control. The atmosphere inside Maspero became more reminiscent of the 1960s, when Nasser’s state media complex was an unabashed government mouthpiece. “Broadcasting as we do in English and French, we always enjoyed a higher degree of freedom than our Arabic-language colleagues and I was able to express myself as I wished,” she told the Guardian. “That day though press releases began arriving from the interior ministry that were questionable, suggesting that the Muslim Brotherhood was behind the protests. I had a talk-show that night, and my boss told me to talk about the ‘foreign elements’ fomenting unrest.” In the absence of live TV images from Tahrir, Amin decided to go down to the square and see for herself what the situation was. “There weren’t any foreign agents, there weren’t any dollars being distributed, there weren’t any of the lies we were being told through the press releases,” she said. “Instead I found a cross-section of Egyptian society, an all-inclusive movement from old to young and rich to poor.” Amin refused to come into work for several days as the protests escalated; in that time her channel broadcast pre-recorded travel programmes about Red Sea holiday towns and made only occasional references to the massive anti-government uprising sweeping the country, normally by focusing on isolated pro-Mubarak supporters. “You can’t have a revolution in your own country and air a story about a beach resort,” she said. “It was ridiculous. Then I saw the Molotov cocktails being thrown at pro-change demonstrators, the violence of the horsemen, the trucks that were running protesters over. For me, that was the breaking point.” Amin tendered her resignation, the first of many inside the state media apparatus who would follow suit as the protests continued. “I realised then that I had to choose which side I was on. And I realised I couldn’t be the mouthpiece of a regime that massacres its own people; that was a line I couldn’t cross.” This week state TV channels have begun to shift the tone of their coverage, offering air time to protesters and in some cases hailing the occupation of Tahrir square as a positive step. On Monday state-run Al-Ahram – the Middle East’s biggest daily newspaper – carried a frontpage editorial praising the “nobility” of the revolution, though it stopped short of calling for the president to step down. “There’s domestic pressure from protesters and outside pressure from Washington to liberalise editorial control, and that’s what we’re now seeing,” claimed Amin. “Nobody inside Maspero is really happy about the government’s response to the protests, they’re just following orders.” Pintak agrees that there is little ideological backing for Mubarak within the ranks of state media employees. “The change in tone and staff resignations do underscore the degree to which the regime is losing support. But it’s also a sign that the majority of Arab journalists, no matter who they work for and what professional compromises they have made, at root support the idea of political and social change. We did a survey a couple of years ago and asked journalists across the region what they saw as the mission of Arab journalism: 75% said political and social change.” Egypt Middle East Protest Jack Shenker guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Follow the latest tweets on protests around the Arab world from our network of journalists, bloggers and experts Garry Blight Matt Wells Alastair Dant
Continue reading …As global food prices soar to a record high, how can we deal with this emerging crisis?
Continue reading …