Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 1752)

In Tuesday's Kansas City Star , reporter Aaron Barnhart revealed that Current TV, the cable channel launched in 2005 by Al Gore, would be the least missed, only managing to be viewed by 18,000 households in the forth quarter of 2010. Also on the list of “Cable's Least Wanted” were the DIY network, ESPN Classic, Fox Soccer Channel, Logo, and Sleuth. Despite such abysmal ratings for Current, Barnhart argued that the addition of former MSNBC Countdown host Keith Olbermann to the channel would turn things around: “The good news for Current is that it won’t be counting its audience in the high five figures, at least not when Olbermann is on the air.” He later remarked: “Unlike Current, the rest of Cable’s Least Wanted don’t have a ratings savior waiting in the wings.” Barnhart was speculating on which channels could be eliminated from the cable lineup to make room for Al Jazeera English. Making an exception for Current, which is independently owned, he lamented how the least popular channels “have been propped up by their parent companies for years….They have never, to my knowledge, contributed to our understanding of the Middle East….It’s worth asking why they continue to take up bandwidth in tens of millions of homes. It’s certainly worth asking if you’re one of the 7 million Americans who recently had to stream the unrest in Egypt on Al Jazeera English because it wasn’t on your cable system.” Concluding his piece, Barnhart continued to attack big media companies for preventing the Middle Eastern news channel from getting a place on cable: “…most low-rated cable channels are owned by media conglomerates that have included them as part of package deals with your cable or satellite provider. (Current and RFD are exceptions.) That’s why you hear cable companies continuing to insist that channel space is too precious to waste on adding a world news service. They couldn’t drop these losers if they wanted to. What was that thing Olbermann was saying the other day about cable TV content that was free from corporate interference?” — Kyle Drennen is a news analyst at the Media Research Center. You can follow him on Twitter here.

Continue reading …

My closet is full of clothes. I hate throwing stuff away. I have clothes in various sizes in my closet. I have new clothes and old clothes. However unlike Joan Crawford, I do indeed have wire hangers in my closet. But despite despite having a couple of minidresses that are pre Roe v Wade, I agree with Joan Crawford ” No more wire hangers”. Wire hangers are cheap and easy to get. Let’s not have them substitute for access to safe and affordable abortions. If the crazy, but wily, Republican right gets their way, access for perhaps 90% or more of all women, will end with the passage of the trio of these three bill….The Pence bill which cuts off funding for Planned Parenthood’s women’s wellness programs from birth control to pap smears, the Smith bill which codifies Hyde, eliminate abortion coverage in private and employer insurance and the Pitts bill, aka the “Let Women Die” bill which eliminates it in under the new health care act. Both Smith and Pitts have hidden land mines, well, actually, they are hiding in plain sight. It’s why they won’t eliminate the Let Women Die provision. Because that gives them the right to have private parties go to court to get an injunction, from a friendly anti choice judge, to stop federal funds to health care entities that provide abortion. Essentially it gives anti choice zealots an veto over abortion. More on that in my next post. Here’s the MoveOn youtube with our favorite hospital administrator, Lisa Edelstein of the show House. MoveOn deserves our help in stepping up for women. Or as Anthony Weiner said at the HR #358 press conference last week “Anyone who knows a woman.” The new ad calls out the Republican efforts for what they are: an attempt to send women back to the back alley. But far too few people even know about their efforts. So to stop them, we’ve got to get this ad out far and wide, and make sure voters see just what Republicans are trying to do. To get the ad on the air on national television, we need to raise $160,000. Can you chip in $5 today? Just click here to see the ad and donate . Women’s rights leaders have warned that the Republican effort would be a radical, far-reaching rollback of women’s rights. Rep. Carolyn Maloney called it “the deepest attack on a woman’s right to choose in my lifetime.” Expert Jessica Arons said it would “accomplish the unstated end of making abortion as difficult to obtain as possible without actually criminalizing it.” One bill would effectively prevent women from purchasing insurance that includes abortion coverage in the new insurance exchanges even if they’re using their own money. Experts warn this type of restriction could lead to insurance companies dropping abortion coverage entirely. The same bill would also levy a tax on small businesses and individuals who purchase insurance coverage that includes abortion. Another bill would, incredibly, allow hospitals to turn away a woman seeking an abortion, even if she’ll die without it—a major change from current law. Republicans have a real chance of passing these bills—unless we sound the alarm right away. Can you help us get this new ad on the air? Just click here to donate and watch the new ad . Thanks for all you do. –Kat, Michael, Lenore, Tim, and the rest of the team

Continue reading …
George Stephanopoulos Touts Michael Bloomberg’s Anti-Gun Truck; ABC Parks It Outside Studio

Good Morning America's George Stephanopoulos on Wednesday conducted a softball interview with Michael Bloomberg, touting his new gun control campaign and never once calling the New York mayor a liberal. GMA even featured a truck promoting Fixgunchecks.org , highlighting the parked vehicle just outside ABC studios. Ignoring ideological labels, Stephanopoulos introduced, “New York Mayor Mike Bloomberg joins us now. He's co-founder of Mayor's Against Illegal Guns and he's unveiling a new campaign today to toughen gun control.” Stephanopoulos didn't offer much in the way of tough questions. After Bloomberg cited the Tucson shooting, the murders of Martin Luther King and Robert Kennedy, the co-anchor blandly wondered, “So, better background checks?” Highlighting undercover operatives sent to Arizona gun shows, Stephanopoulos did mildly challenge, “You went undercover down to a gun show, I guess last month in Arizona. The AG there just said it was just a PR stunt.”

Continue reading …
Boehner: If Government Jobs are Lost From Spending Cuts ‘So Be It’

Click here to view this media Hey John Boehner… where are the jobs? Oh, I guess they don’t matter if it’s government employees potentially getting hammered from the GOP’s proposed spending cuts. Boehner: If Jobs Are Lost As A Result Of GOP Spending Cuts ‘So Be It’ : If House Republicans succeed in cutting tens of billions of dollars in discretionary spending over the next six months, some of the most immediate victims will be federal employees, many of whose jobs will be slashed as their agencies pare back. At a press conference in the lobby of RNC headquarters Tuesday morning, House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) shrugged this off as collateral damage. “In the last two years, under President Obama, the federal government has added 200,000 new federal jobs,” Boehner said. “If some of those jobs are lost so be it. We’re broke.” Some of those employees will no doubt collect unemployment insurance, so the government’s obligation to them won’t disappear with their jobs. As TPM and John King pointed out, his numbers are wrong too. And you’ve got to love CNN’s favorite phony baloney “centrist” hack John Avlon defending Boehner here. Talking like some tough guy when you’re doing real damage to real people’s lives isn’t going to win him any points in the minds of most of the electorate. It would be nice if his constituency at home finally had a belly full of him. UPDATE: And here’s more from Steve Benen. Apparently Villager Mark Halperin is trying to trivialize this as some sort of minor gaffe by Boehner. As Steve explains, it’s not . And Rachel Maddow opened her show by asking if John Boehner is just not very good at his job considering the way the last month has gone for him, with this remark just being the latest in a series of missteps. Click here to view this media

Continue reading …
Finally! O’Reilly and guests tackle the Shawna Forde case. Of course, they lie and misinform from beginning to end.

Click here to view this media Of all the media entities that have ignored the case of Shawna Forde and her killer Minutemen , the silence at Fox News has been the most egregious and noteworthy — particularly because Bill O’Reilly is fond of criticizing other news organizations for supposedly “ignoring” stories that he has deemed eminently newsworthy (even if, in fact, they haven’t really ignored them at all, or it’s in fact a story of dubious veracity ). So naturally we were pleasantly surprised when O’Reilly began tackling the Forde case last night with his panel of legal “experts” — and, to no one’s great surprise, it was nothing but a pack of lies, disinformation and grotesque distortions, from start to finish. For instance, here’s O’Reilly’s opening, having just discussed yet another case of an “illegal immigrant” having committed a murder, one of O’Reilly’s favorite schticks: O’REILLY: Now — exact opposite on the political spectrum, in Arizona. A woman member of the Minutemen breaks into an illegal alien house ? GUILFOYLE: Right. No, that’s wrong : Both Raul Junior Flores and his 9-year-old daughter, Brisenia (as well as Gina Gonzalez, the girl’s mother) were American citizens , born and raised in Arivaca. And from a factually false opening, it goes rapidly downhill: Both Guilfoyle and Wiehl begin trading in even more factually wrong characterizations of Forde and her relationship to the Minuteman movement. Guilfoyle was perhaps the worst: GUILFOYLE: This woman has some, um, problems otherwise. This wasn’t really about immigration — this was a woman who is a criminal, was working with this group to do drug ripoffs. O’REILLY: She’s a criminal herself. GUILFOYLE: Yes. The organization she belonged to was Minuteman American Defense, otherwise known as MAD. But I did a lot of research on this case, and essentially she was using this organization to say, ‘I’m gonna do rip-offs of drug cartels to fund my group. O’REILLY: Ohhh, so she joined the group to find out where illegal aliens who might be dealing narcotics. Wiehl at least points out that Forde didn’t join MAD — she founded it. But that’s the least of the issues here: What’s more important is that in fact this case had everything to do with immigration, which was the entire fuel motivating Forde’s radicalism: She saw herself as a Minuteman “willing to take it to the next level” — and she was using the drug money to do that. Indeed, as we reported early on, she intended to metastasize MAD with the money so that it became a kind of super-militia whose larger purpose was to take on the federal government, not just over immigration but a whole panoply of related “Patriot” movement issues. This wasn’t about ordinary criminality: It was about right-wing radicalism. As Scott North of the Everett Herald reported back then, she was talking to a lot of people about her plans for the group: Accused ringleader Shawna Forde told her family in recent months that she had begun recruiting members of the Aryan Nations and that she planned to begin robbing drug-cartel leaders, her brother Merrill Metzger said Monday in a telephone interview from Redding, Calif. “She was talking about starting a revolution against the United States government,” he said. In any event, at this point things in the O’Reilly Factor discussion became nothing but a farrago of falsehoods: WIEHL: She was kicked out of two other organizations. O’REILLY: Oh, she got kicked out of the Minutemen? WIEHL: Well, that was the point. She was such a nut that she was kicked out of Minutemen. She started her own organization. O’REILLY: All right, so her scam was, she would enter suspected drug dealers’ homes and steal their drugs. WIEHL: She thought he had $4,000 bucks in drug money, she wanted to go in there and get that money with her two accomplices. O’REILLY: She killed how many people? WIEHL: She killed the man, she killed the 9-year-old child — O’REILLY: She killed a 9-year-old. WIEHL: Yes. The mother of the 9-year-old was on the phone — GUILFOYLE: She was present, she wasn’t the shooter. O’REILLY: Now, does she get the death penalty? Has she been sentenced? GUILFOYLE: She is now eligible for the death penalty. The jury is considering it. Her defense at the time was, ‘It wasn’t me. It was the girlfriend of one of my codefendants.’ O’REILLY: But it doesn’t matter, because she was convicted of the murders. WIEHL: Right. O’REILLY: So she’s gonna go. All right, so then, uh — GUILFOYLE: And she should — and the Minutemen organizations don’t want any association with her. O’REILLY: And we want to emphasize that she was kicked out — WIEHL: She was not part of the Minutemen. GUILFOYLE: One of them, she was kicked out within 40 minutes of attending her first meeting! WIEHL: She lied, she said she was leader, she wasn’t any of those things. O’REILLY: So she covered her own stupid organization as a cover for her own criminal activities. GUILFOYLE: That’s correct. O’REILLY: Then she got what she deserved. Both Wiehl and Guilfoyle are simply lying here: Shawna Forde was a significant figure in the Minuteman movement in Washington state for the better part of two years before she headed to Arizona. She appeared onstage in Everett with Minuteman Project cofounder Jim Gilchrist at a big Minuteman rally in 2007, and appeared on a public-TV town hall as a spokesman for both the Minutemen and the Federation for American Immigration Reform, which later — much later — repudiated her as their spokesman. Click here to view this media And while it’s undeniable that she was bounced from a number of Minutemen gatherings — not for being a nutcase who was too extreme, but for being a mouthy and unpleasant person. She was kicked out of the Washington state chapter of the Minuteman Civil Defense Corps not because they found her too extreme, but because she was caught stealing from the back bedroom of one of the local Minutemen’s home. Just to demonstrate how dishonest they are being here: Where does Guilfoyle get the anecdote that she was kicked out of one group within 40 minutes? Well, from Tim Steller’s superb reportage for the Arizona Daily Star , which included this little nugget about her serial rejections by a number of Minutemen: In August 2008, Forde showed up uninvited at Camp Vigilance, used by the Minuteman Corps of California and the private group Border Patrol Auxiliary as a base for patrols, said member Carl Braun. She was ejected after 40 minutes. Last October, she showed up at a camp near Three Points where the Minutemen Civil Defense Corps had a group, Simcox said. There, too, she was ejected not long after arriving, he said. But let’s go back and read the lede to that story: Shawna Forde was a rogue, many border-security activists say, or an impostor or a criminal. They say the woman now charged in connection with the home invasion and shooting deaths of an Arivaca marijuana-trafficking suspect and his 9-year-old daughter was not really one of them. But interviews with so-called Minutemen and their critics, as well as reviews of recently scrubbed Web sites, suggest Forde was well-placed in the border-security movement and represented a persistent radical wing. “Shawna Forde was very much a known entity in this movement and, to some degree and to different folks, tolerated for quite some time,” said Brian Levin, director of the Center for the Study of Hate and Extremism at California State University-San Bernardino. Here’s Shawna bragging to Scott North in early 2009 about her border-patrolling activities in the Arivaca area: Additionally, she claimed herself that she was “not insignificant to this movement”: Of course, Forde is a well-established liar and braggart with the opposite of credibility. But in this case, it was true — largely because, through thick and thin, she had a loyal and longtime defender in Jim Gilchrist, the cofounder of the Minuteman Project. Indeed, as North reported over a year ago, Gilchrist was running updates on Shawna’s border patrols on his Minuteman Project web site even after the Flores murders — in a report that tried to blame the murders on illegal immigrants. Moreover, he then corresponded with her by e-mails to query about the story that the authorities were after her: Gilchrist stood by Forde when her ex-husband was shot, after her reported rape and after her mysterious shooting, when she was wounded in the arm. When The Herald in February revealed Forde’s history of childhood felonies and teenage prostitution, Gilchrist said what mattered more was her ability to overcome a troubled past. “She is no whiner,” he wrote at the time. “She is a stoic struggler who has chosen to put country, community and a yearning for a civilized society ahead of avarice and self-glorifying ego.” Gilchrist remained in touch with Forde after she left Everett without giving detectives a chance to question her closely about the attempted murder of her ex-husband. On the Minuteman Project Web site, Gilchrist continued to post press releases and Forde’s dispatches detailing her Arizona border exploits. One of the last arrived on May 31, just hours after the Arivaca killings. Forde reported that she and her group had been in “boots on the ground” patrols of the border for eight days and had observed thousands of pounds of dope being smuggled into the country. “A (sic) American family was murdered 2 days ago including a 9 year old girl,” Forde wrote. “Territory issue’s (sic) are now spilling over like fire on the US side and leaving Americans so afraid they will not even allow their names to be printed in any press releases.” In a few days Gilchrist began receiving e-mails from a Minuteman in Tucson who had previously let Forde’s teenage daughter live at his home. The man asked Gilchrist why a SWAT team had shown up at his door looking for Forde. “I called her,” Gilchrist said. “She was as calm as can be.” Forde told him there was no cause for worry. The man, she said, was a disgruntled former member of her group. At the same time, though, she was sending out a list of 17 people around the country she wanted contacted if she was arrested or killed. After her arrest, Gilchrist learned he was 10th on her list. He and Steve Eichler, executive director of the Minuteman Project, almost certainly were among the last people Forde e-mailed before her June 12 arrest. They talked about adding her and her officers to their Web site’s list of national Minutemen leaders. “The border is going to be HOT. Good things to come my brother,” Forde wrote Eichler that morning. She was in police handcuffs later that day. Gilchrist has since scrubbed references to Forde from his Web site. He says she appears to have cloaked her true self behind the Minutemen movement. “We all have to be aware that there are individuals who have motives other than altruistic ones,” he said. “But you don’t know until they present themselves.” I wouldn’t want either of these legal “experts” as my attorney. Not if they claim to have done heavy “research” into a story and then the best they can come up with is a pack of falsehoods. But that’s about the best we can ever expect to get on The O’Reilly Factor.

Continue reading …

Yesterday I rebuked Time's Jay Newton-Small for falsely characterizing a bill before South Dakota's state legislature that would make it legal to use lethal force against a person attempting to kill an unborn child in the commission of a crime. “South Dakota is apparently considering legalizing the murder of doctors who perform abortions,” Newton-Small complained. Later yesterday afternoon, Time magazine staffer Amy Sullivan corrected her colleague about the purpose and scope of the legislation, but feared that extremist violence might be encouraged by the state's relatively restrictive abortion laws: Of course, that's an awfully thin semantic line preventing a pro-life extremist from legally going after one of South Dakota's two abortion providers. Especially given the increasing array of restrictions that surround abortion in the state. South Dakota has a parental notification law. Does that mean if a doctor performs an abortion on a teenager who has not obtained her parent's consent, that abortion is illegal and the doc is fair game? It's unclear. And that's a problem–even if the bill isn't quite as inflammatory as it first appeared.

Continue reading …
Berlusconi ‘not worried’ about trial

Silvio Berlusconi, the Italian prime minister, has made his first appearance since being ordered to stand trial over allegations he paid for sex with an underage girl, nicknamed Ruby the Heart Stealer. Despite coming under mounting pressure over the scandals, the premier told journalists on Wednesday that he was not worried about the prosecution, and vowed to stay in office. Sonia Gallego reports.

Continue reading …

Oopsies. Guess cowards also cut deals for free legal services The Office of Congressional Ethics is investigating Rep. Jean Schmidt ’s receipt of legal assistance from a Turkish-American interest group that has represented her in a host of proceedings in Ohio, one of the Republican’s counsels confirmed Friday. Schmidt attorney Bruce Fein declined to answer questions about how he is paid, saying he is responding to a request from the OCE, the board that reviews potential rules violations and recommends investigations to the House Ethics Committee. “We’ll be making proper responses to an outstanding inquiry,” said Fein, an attorney with the Turkish American Legal Defense Fund and a resident scholar at the Turkish Coalition of America. Fein did not detail the inquiry, and the OCE does not comment publicly on its work or confirm whether it is reviewing specific matters. But Democrat David Krikorian, who has twice sought to challenge Schmidt for the 2nd district seat, has filed multiple complaints to the OCE, alleging that the Ohio lawmaker improperly received free legal services from the TCA and its legal defense fund in violation of House rules. It is not known whether the OCE investigation stems from Krikorian’s complaints. In a statement Monday, Schmidt spokesman Brian Pfaff acknowledged the Ohio lawmaker had not received a bill from TALDF for its work to date but said Schmidt had followed House rules.

Continue reading …
‘Mubarak must return money,’ says Castro – video

Hosni Mubarak is suspected of squirrelling away a fortune running into hundreds of millions abroad. Former Cuban president Fidel Castro has backed Egyptians’ demand that the cash be clawed back to help alleviate poverty in Egypt

Continue reading …
Colbert Takes a Shot at Glenn Beck and His Fearmongering About an Islamic Caliphate in the Middle East

Click here to view this media Stephen Colbert had a bit of fun with Fox’s resident fearmonger-in-chief Glenn Beck on his show this Monday. TPM has more — Colbert Pokes Holes In Beck’s Egypt Conspiracy Theory With A Mummified Penis (VIDEO) : Stephen Colbert struggled last night to pin down a conspiracy theory good enough to explain the uprising in Egypt. Was it a digital revolution or, as Glen Beck has warned, the first stages of a looming Islamic caliphate? Or perhaps most sinister of all, was it caused by the curse of King Tut’s stolen manhood? Colbert rolled a clip from Beck’s program last week in which the Fox News host used Egypt as a launching point to argue that the Middle East and then ultimately the world would be brought under a new communist Islamic world order. Though Beck hedged that he couldn’t say for sure if or when that would all happen, Colbert said that made the theory even more dangerous. “The conspiracies that we know are coming but might never happen are the most dangerous,” Colbert said, “because if they might never happen, how will we know if we stopped it?” Not to be outdone by Beck’s theory, Colbert then introduced one of his own. Linking the uprising to the legendary curse of King Tut, Colbert speculated that it was really a huge cover up initiated by the same dark forces behind the mystery of the “pharoah’s pilfered phallus.” My favorite lines from the clip. And sure Occam’s razor says the simplest answer is usually correct. But fortunately, Glenn Beck isn’t allowed near razors. O’Reilly doesn’t buy Beck’s conspiracy. To him, this situation is understandable, unlike the tides. But, if in fact, if it’s not Code Pink and Islamists and Communists, then who is behind this uprising in Egypt?

Continue reading …